Comparison of outcomes between single-port and multi-port robotic radical nephrectomy.

Single-port (SP) robotic surgery is a novel technology, and although there is emerging data, it remains limited in assessing single-port (SP) robot-assisted surgery as an alternative to multi-port (MP) platforms. To compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes between SP and MP robotic technologies for radical nephrectomy (RN). This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who have undergone robot-assisted radical nephrectomy using either the SP or MP technology. Baseline demographics, clinical, tumor-specific characteristics, and perioperative and postoperative outcomes were compared using χ ² , t-test, Fisher exact test, and Mann-Whitney U test. Multivariable analyses were conducted using robust, Poisson, and logistic regressions. A total of 341 patients underwent robotic RN with 47 patients (14%) in the SP group. The two groups exhibited similar baseline characteristics, with no significant differences in age, sex, body mass index, Charlson comorbidities index, and tumor laterality. However, SP group had a smaller average tumor size (5.1 cm vs 6.4 cm, p = 0.009). The SP had longer operative time (178 ± 84 min vs 142 ± 75 min; p = 0.011) but showed no significant difference in the estimated blood loss, blood transfusion rate, length of stay, overall 30-day and major complication rates. Controlling for other variables, SP was significantly associated with a longer operative time and shorter length of stay. SP is associated with longer operative time but offers advantages such as smaller incisions and shorter hospital stays with a comparative safety profile to MP for radical nephrectomy.
Competing Interests: Declarations Conflict of interest Kennedy E Okhawere certifies that all conflicts of interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript (e.g., employment/affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, or patents filed, received, or pending), are the following: Dr. Ronney Abaza is a lecturer for Intuitive Surgical Inc. and VTI Inc. Dr. Michael Stifelman is on the scientific advisory board of Intuitive Surgery and has an educational agreement with Ethicon. Dr. Mutahar Ahmed is a consultant for CONMED and Intuitive Surgical. Dr. Jihad Kaouk is a consultant for Intuitive Surgical. The remaining authors declare that they have no relevant financial interest. Ethical approval Before involving any centers or recruiting participants, the study secured the necessary approvals from the relevant institutional ethics review boards and established data sharing agreements. Consent to participate Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study. Consent to publish Not applicable.
(© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)