Search

Anti-interleukin 5 (IL-5) and anti-IL-5 receptor α monoclonal antibodies markedly decrease airway and peripheral blood eosinophil numbers and are thus highly effective in reducing asthma exacerbations. Nonetheless, these biologics do not completely resolve exacerbations. There is very little information on the cellular nature of exacerbations during treatment with biologics. Using illustrative clinical case scenarios, we highlight the importance of carefully characterizing asthmatics at the time of exacerbation and recognizing neutrophilic causes of exacerbations to ensure optimal management. While an eosinophilic exacerbation may improve with more corticosteroids or by switching to another anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody, a noneosinophilic exacerbation will likely not. An infective exacerbation needs to be recognized, and the pathogen must be identified and treated with the appropriate antimicrobial agent.

Background Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a non-invasive fungal disease that results from chronic allergic inflammation of the sinonasal mucosa. Failure to respond to mainstay medical therapies and sinus surgery leaves AFRS patients with limited alternatives and a decreased quality of life. Mepolizumab is a known IL-5 antagonist for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. Objective To identify the efficacy of mepolizumab on improving Modified Lund-Kennedy (MLK) endoscopic scores in recalcitrant AFRS patients with asthma. Methods Retrospective chart review of 27 recalcitrant AFRS patients with asthma receiving a monthly mepolizumab injection between January 2017 and July 2019. Patients were evaluated endoscopically at baseline and at each follow-up visit every 6–8 weeks until their third visit. Secondary outcomes included SNOT-22 scores, serum eosinophil counts and the rate of prednisone rescues required in patients receiving mepolizumab compared to a retrospective control arm. Results Total median MLK scores improved significantly for all patients over three follow-up visits (6[4,7], 4[2,6], 5[2,6], 3.5[2.25,5]; p = 0.04). Amongst patients with a baseline polyposis score of 1 or more, combined MLK edema and polyposis sub-scores significantly improved (6[5.25,6], 3.5[2.25,5,75], 4[2.75,5.25], 4[3,4]; p = 0.02) versus patients with no polyposis (4[3,4], 3[1,4], 4[2,4], 3[0,4]; p = 0.90). Total SNOT-22 scores (56 vs 43; p = 0.04) and eosinophil counts (0.40 × 109/L vs 0.00 × 109/L; p Conclusion Mepolizumab injections administered once monthly as an adjunctive treatment for recalcitrant AFRS patients with asthma appear to significantly reduce endoscopic signs of inflammation, patient-reported symptomatology and serum eosinophil levels. Patients with evidence of more severe endoscopic inflammation appear to benefit the most. Adjunctive treatment with mepolizumab does not reduce the need for prednisone rescues.

The interleukin 5 (IL-5) pathway is an important component in the pathophysiology of severe eosinophilic asthma. Mepolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets the IL-5 pathway. Clinical trials showed efficacy of Mepolizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. However, reports on experience with treatment in a real-world cohort are limited.Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Mepolizumab for treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma in a real-world cohort of patients.A clinical prospective observational trial included all patients18 years treated with Mepolizumab between March 2016 to March 2019 at Rabin Medical Center. The composite primary outcome measures evaluated: increase in FEV1 by≥ 200 ml and/or decrease in exacerbation rate of ≥50% and/or cessation of oral corticosteroids (OCS) treatment or ≥50% decrease in dosage. Also evaluated: blood eosinophil count, adverse events and quality of life.Of 61 patients, 50 (82.0%) achieved the primary outcome. The number of patients who suffered from frequent exacerbations decreased from 52 (85.2%) to 8 (13.1%) (Treatment with mepolizumab was well tolerated and significantly lowered the exacerbation rate and OCS dependence in a real-world cohort of severe eosinophilic asthma patients. Response to therapy was within six months and treatment effect was sustained over time.

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake in the fifth paragraph of the "Conclusion" section.

Immunoglobulin (Ig) E-mediated food allergy and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are chronic, allergen-mediated disorders characterized by an aberrant TH2 immune response. The development and investigation of biologics for the treatment of IgE-mediated food allergy and eosinophilic esophagitis have provided further insight into the pathophysiology and management of these disorders. This article provides an overview of biologic therapies that are being investigated or have potential as treatments for IgE-mediated food allergy and eosinophilic esophagitis. Identification of EoE phenotypes that are responsive to biologics and investigation of biologics combined with other therapies may help elucidate a role for biologics in EoE.

Several biologics are currently FDA approved for asthma that target Th2 high patients. Unfortunately, 50% of patients with severe asthma do not fit this phenotype of disease and have fewer effective therapeutic options. In the clinical setting, total IgE, FeNO and peripheral blood eosinophils are important tools in defining Th2 high patients with asthma. However, precise biomarkers to predict better response to one specific Th2 high asthma therapy versus another is lacking. It is important to recognize that none of the current medications targeting the Th2 pathway induces persistent immunomodulation or remission.

Asthma is an important chronic disease affecting a lot of people worldwide. Treatment options for asthma like biological agents are being developed more frequently nowadays. Despite a lot of treatment options, some patients still remain symptomatic. As more and more practitioners choose treatment with biologic agents as a convenient way of therapy, biologic agents and other valuable methods must be discovered in order to cope with a growing number of treatment agents. This manuscript emphasizes on new generation monoclonal human(ized) antibodies in asthmatics and off-label use . The first developed biologic agent is the anti-immunoglobulin E monoclonal antibody called omalizumab. Currently it is an approved treatment option for asthma.

Recent advances in our understanding of the immune-mediated inflammatory pathways in asthma and other allergic diseases have resulted in the development of novel biological compounds for the treatment of these conditions. These compounds offer an advantage over glucocorticosteroid therapy by specifically targeting components of the immunologic cascade, thereby allowing patients to reduce or discontinue their glucocorticosteroid treatment. Another potential advantage of biological compounds is that they may provide additional anti-inflammatory benefits, over and above those provided by glucocorticosteroid therapy, for patients who continue to have evidence of refractory asthma. The anti-IgE monoclonal antibody omalizumab is already being used for the treatment of allergic asthma and a number of other biological therapies are currently in various stages of clinical development. The purpose of this review is to summarize the data from these studies and to provide a rationale for the use of these compounds in asthma and related allergic airway diseases.

Mepolizumab (Bosatria(®), GlaxoSmithKline) is a biologic agent developed to treat asthma. It represents a humanized monoclonal antibody of IgG1 κ type, which targets human IL-5 and thus prevents its interaction with the α-chain of the IL-5 receptor. To date, it has not been approved for use in any eosinophil-related disorder; however, several studies have suggested some therapeutic benefit across a spectrum of eosinophil-related disorders. This article evaluates the currently available preclinical and clinical studies, and the impact of mepolizumab against a variety of eosinophilic disorders.