Search

Within the context of limited financial and physical resources in South Africa, academic neonatologists have established strict criteria for ventilation of neonates with hyaline membrane disease (HMD). In the private sector neonatal care is less structured. Following the introduction of the artificial surfactant (Survanta) in November 1991 it was considered important to monitor its use in the public and private sectors. In collaboration with the marketing company a data sheet containing demographic information and clinical details was drawn up to be completed in each case where Survanta was administered to babies with HMD. Data from 155 babies treated at 10 hospitals were included in the final analysis (70 babies from 4 State-funded academic hospitals and 85 from 6 privately funded hospitals). Within the group of private hospitals there were some which treated large numbers of babies weighing > 2,000 g, while in a few others there was a relative excess of babies weighing < 1,000 g. There was a higher incidence of patent ductus arteriosus and intraventricular haemorrhage, and a higher mortality rate at the academic hospitals. Poor outcome at these institutions may largely have been due to poor antenatal care.

The cost of surfactant replacement therapy (SRT) will restrict its use under conditions of limited health resources. Before the local advent of SRT, infants ventilated for hyaline membrane disease (HMD) had an overall survival rate of 87% and an incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia of 6.4%. This, together with the cost of SRT, prompted a study to identify those infants who would benefit the most from SRT. Twenty-two infants assessed as having severe HMD were randomised to receive SRT at 3 - 4 hours (9) or at 6 - 8 hours (13) after birth. Two infants (15%) in the latter group did not require SRT. The outcome of these two groups was the same. Of 56 infants assessed as having moderate HMD, only 24 (43%) qualified for SRT from 6 hours of age. The outcome of the SRT and non-SRT infants was comparable. The group of infants with moderate HMD had a significantly better outcome than those with severe HMD. A limited period of observation to assess the severity of illness did not compromise outcome in this group of 78 infants with moderate to severe HMD.

Objective: To assess the impact of surfactant replacement therapy (SRT) on the outcome of hyaline membrane disease (HMD) and to assess the cost implications of a policy of selective administration of artificial surfactant., Design: The short-term outcome of 103 newborns ventilated for HMD (61 selected for SRT according to initial and/or ongoing oxygen requirements) was compared with that of a historical control group of 173 infants ventilated for HMD before the introduction of SRT., Main Outcome Measures: Mortality and morbidity of HMD including death, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, pneumothorax, pulmonary haemorrhage, patent ductus arteriosus and intraventricular haemorrhage., Results: There were significant demographic differences between the treatment and control groups (black patients 74% v. 28%, P < 0.0001; unbooked mothers 72% v. 15%, P < 0.0001) as well as evidence of more severe lung disease in the treatment group (pressor support 44% v. 27%, P < 0.005; and paralysis during ventilation 38% v. 25%, P < 0.005). Pneumothorax was reduced in the SRT group (7% v. 17%, P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of BPD or mortality. The use of SRT added to the total cost of treating a patient ventilated for HMD., Conclusion: The selective use of SRT had the effect of converting severe disease into moderate disease rather than achieving maximal benefit in all cases of HMD through routine use of the product. A policy of restricting use may result in cost savings where resources are limited.

Current recommendations for surfactant replacement therapy (SRT) in the treatment of hyaline membrane disease (HMD) are to administer the drug as soon as possible after starting ventilation in order to prevent ventilator lung damage. We present a review of 18 infants (gestational age 32.4 +/- 1.9 weeks and birth weight 1,795 +/- 427 g) who received the initial dose of SRT after they were 12 hours old. Fourteen infants were assessed as having HMD and 4 as having congenital pneumonia. Overall there was a significant and sustained improvement in oxygenation as measured by arterial/alveolar oxygen ratios. The outcome of these infants was good, with a duration of ventilation of 7.9 +/- 4.3 days and a duration of hospitalisation of 26.2 +/- 12.6 days. No infant developed bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Of particular interest is that 3 infants weighing > 2,400 g with congenital pneumonia responded to a single delayed dose of SRT. Late SRT is effective and there may be a place for SRT in the treatment of conditions other than HMD.