1. Refining Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation Definition by Echocardiography with a New Outcomes-Based 'Massive' Grade
- Author
-
Lynn Weinert, Victor Mor-Avi, Kalie Kebed, Megan Yamat, Karima Addetia, Roberto M. Lang, Michael P. Henry, and Stephanie A. Besser
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Percutaneous ,Heart Ventricles ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Severity of Illness Index ,Article ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,Basal (phylogenetics) ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,Humans ,Medicine ,Cutoff ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Survival analysis ,Tricuspid valve ,Vena contracta ,Ventricular Remodeling ,business.industry ,Medical record ,Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Echocardiography ,Cohort ,Cardiology ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current echocardiographic guidelines recommend that tricuspid regurgitation (TR) severity be graded into three categories, following assessment of specific parameters. Findings from recent trials have shown that the severity of TR frequently far exceeds the current definition of severe. We postulated that a grading approach that emphasizes outcomes could be useful to identify patients with severe TR at increased risk of mortality. METHODS: We identified 284 patients with echocardiograms demonstrating severe functional TR, defined as vena contracta (VC) ≥0.7 cm. Demographics and mortality data were obtained from the medical records. Patients were divided into Study (n=122 patients with 3D images) and Validation (n=162) cohorts. VC was measured in both the right ventricular (RV) inflow and apical-4 chamber views and averaged. For the Study cohort, tricuspid annular (TA), RV end-diastolic (basal, mid, long axis) dimensions, tricuspid leaflet tenting height and area, RV free-wall longitudinal strain (Epsilon Imaging), and RV volumes (TomTec) were measured from 2D and 3D datasets, respectively. A K-partition algorithm was used in the Study cohort to derive a mortality-related cutoff VC value, above which TR was termed “massive”. The ability of this VC cutoff to identify patients at greater mortality risk was then tested in the Validation cohort using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: In the Study cohort, VC>0.92 cm (”massive” TR) was optimally associated with worse survival. TA and RV size were larger in the Massive group (p
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF