1. Continuing professional education of Iranian healthcare professionals in shared decision-making: lessons learned
- Author
-
Jordie Croteau, Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi, Amir Mohammad Navali, Alireza Sadeghpour, and Charo Rodríguez
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Medical education ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Decision Making ,education ,Patient engagement ,Iran ,Health informatics ,Health administration ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Education, Professional ,Pregnancy ,Cultural diversity ,Decision aids ,Humans ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Shared decision making ,Preventive healthcare ,business.industry ,030503 health policy & services ,Health Policy ,Nursing research ,lcsh:Public aspects of medicine ,lcsh:RA1-1270 ,Continuous professional development ,Middle Aged ,Facilitator ,Implementation ,Female ,Observational study ,Patient Participation ,0305 other medical science ,business ,Decision Making, Shared ,Research Article - Abstract
BackgroundIn this study, we sought to assess healthcare professionals’ acceptance of and satisfaction with a shared decision making (SDM) educational workshop, its impact on their intention to use SDM, and their perceived facilitators and barriers to the implementation of SDM in clinical settings in Iran.MethodsWe conducted an observational quantitative study that involved measurements before, during, and immediately after the educational intervention at stake. We invited healthcare professionals affiliated with Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, East Azerbaijan, Iran, to attend a half-day workshop on SDM in December 2016. Decisions about prenatal screening and knee replacement surgery was used as clinical vignettes. We provided a patient decision aid on prenatal screening that complied with the International Patient Decision Aids Standards and used illustrate videos. Participants completed a sociodemographic questionnaire and a questionnaire to assess their familiarity with SDM, a questionnaire based on theoretical domains framework to assess their intention to implement SDM, a questionnaire about their perceived facilitators and barriers of implementing SDM in their clinical practice, continuous professional development reaction questionnaire, and workshop evaluation. Quantitative data was analyzed descriptively and with multiple linear regression.ResultsAmong the 60 healthcare professionals invited, 41 participated (68%). Twenty-three were female (57%), 18 were specialized in family and emergency medicine, or community and preventive medicine (43%), nine were surgeons (22%), and 14 (35%) were other types of specialists. Participants’ mean age was 37.51 ± 8.64 years with 8.09 ± 7.8 years of clinical experience. Prior to the workshop, their familiarity with SDM was 3.10 ± 2.82 out of 9. After the workshop, their belief that practicing SDM would be beneficial and useful (beliefs about consequences) (beta = 0.67, 95% CI 0.27, 1.06) and beliefs about capability of using SDM (beta = 0.32, 95% CI -0.08, 0.72) had the strongest influence on their intention of practicing SDM. Participants perceived the main facilitator and barrier to perform SDM were training and high patient load, respectively.ConclusionsParticipants thought the workshop was a good way to learn SDM and that they would be able to use what they had learned in their clinical practice. Future studies need to study the level of intention of participants in longer term and evaluate the impact of cultural differences on practicing SDM and its implementation in both western and non-western countries.
- Published
- 2021