1. Healthcare-associated infection impact with bioaerosol treatment and COVID-19 mitigation measures
- Author
-
J. Fine, B. Mathew, D. Hess, E. Simpser, Mark H. Ereth, and F. Stamatatos
- Subjects
Microbiology (medical) ,Healthcare associated infections ,Breathing zone ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,Health Care-Associated Infections ,Airborne transmission ,Article ,Bioburden ,Engineering ,Disease Transmission ,Environmental health ,Humans ,Medicine ,Infection control ,Cross Infection ,Infection Control ,SARS-CoV-2 ,business.industry ,COVID-19 ,General Medicine ,Aerosolization ,Infectious Diseases ,Aerosol Transmission ,business ,Delivery of Health Care ,Bioaerosol ,Workflow patterns - Abstract
BACKGROUND: The real-world impact of breathing zone air purification and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mitigation measures on healthcare-associated infections is not well documented. Engineering solutions to treat airborne transmission of disease may yield results in controlled test chambers or single rooms, but have not been reported on hospital-wide applications, and the impact of COVID-19 mitigation measures on healthcare-associated infection rates is unknown. AIM: To determine the impact of hospital-wide bioaerosol treatment and COVID-19 mitigation measures on clinical outcomes. METHODS: The impact of the step-wise addition of air disinfection technology and COVID-19 mitigation measures to standard multi-modal infection control on particle counts, viral and bacterial bioburden, and healthcare-associated infection rates was investigated in a 124-bed hospital (>100,000 patient-days over 30 months). FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION: The addition of air disinfection technology and COVID-19 mitigation measures reduced airborne ultrafine particles, altered hospital bioburden, and reduced healthcare-associated infections from 11.9 to 6.6 (per 1000 patient-days) and from 6.6 to 1.0 (per 1000 patient-days), respectively (P
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF