Search

Objectives: Histamine is a known inducer of cAMP-responsive element binding protein (CREB), which plays a key role in initiation of adipogenesis. Our present goal was to study how histamine deficiency impacts CREB signalling and adipogenesis., Methods: We used a histidine-decarboxylase gene-targeted (HDC KO) mice model lacking endogenous histamine. We measured CREB activity and expression by EMSA, Western blot and real-time RT-PCR, as well as cAMP levels by ELISA in primary embryonic fibroblasts derived from WT and HDC KO mice. The ability of these cells to form adipocytes was also tested in preliminary experiments., Results: We found that in the absence of the histamine, cells show higher constitutive CREB activity and greatly increased intracellular cAMP levels, as well as that in contrast to WT cells, HDC KO fibroblasts are more prone to differentiate into adipocytes., Conclusion: These data suggest a newly recognised inhibitory role for histamine in CREB activity and draws attention to the potential role of histamine in adipocyte differentiation.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of histamine, a product of e.g. mast cells, on short-circuit current (I(sc)) across rat distal colon. Histamine concentration-dependently stimulated an increase in I(sc), which often was preceded by a transient negative current. Neither a release of neurotransmitters nor a release of prostaglandins contributed to the histamine response. The histamine-induced increase in I(sc) was blocked by the histamine H(1) antagonist, pyrilamine, but was resistant against the histamine H(2) antagonist, cimetidine. Conversely, the histamine H(1) agonist, TMPH (2-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)histamine), exclusively evoked an increase in I(sc), whereas the histamine H(2) agonist, amthamine, evoked only a decrease in I(sc) suggesting that stimulation of different types of histamine receptors is responsible for the two phases of the response evoked by native histamine. Histamine induces the opening of glibenclamide-sensitive Cl(-) channels and of charybdotoxin-sensitive K(+) channels in the apical membrane as demonstrated by experiments at basolaterally depolarized epithelia. A further action site is the basolateral membrane, because histamine stimulates a charybdotoxin- and tetrapentylammonium-sensitive K(+) conductance in this membrane as observed in tissues, in which the apical membrane was permeabilized with an ionophore, nystatin. The increase in I(sc) evoked by histamine was blocked after depletion of intracellular Ca(2+) stores with cyclopiazonic acid and after blockade of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP(3)) receptors, suggesting a release of stored Ca(2+). This was confirmed by the observation that the histamine H(1) agonist TMPH induced an increase in the fura-2 ratio signal of epithelial cells within isolated colonic crypts. Consequently, the mediator histamine seems to stimulate both histamine H(1) and H(2) receptors, from which the former seems to be prominently involved in the induction of epithelial chloride secretion.

Histamine H2 receptors were tagged at the N-terminus with the eight amino acid Flag epitope to allow the immunological identification of the receptor peptide with the monoclonal anti-Flag M2 antibody. The introduction of the epitope did not modify the binding of several H2 ligands to the H2 receptor, nor the ability of histamine to stimulate the H2 receptor mediated cAMP production in HEK-293 cells. Western blots revealed a major protein band of 57 +/- 1 kDa, whereas a second band of 31 +/- 1 kDa was probably the result of a proteolytic breakdown of the 57 kDa band. Immunofluorescence measurements of stably transfected HEK-293 cells revealed the presence of anti-Flag-immunoreactivity in the plasma membrane. This immunoreactivity completely disappeared after a one hour treatment with histamine. The receptor internalization was reversible and blocked by the endocytosis inhibitor phenylarsine oxide. Forskolin did not induce H2 receptor internalization, indicating that histamine causes H2 receptor internalization via a cAMP-independent pathway.

We investigated effects of the biogenic diamine histamine on antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) against autologous anti-D-coated red blood cells mediated by human granulocytes, monocytes, and natural killer (NK) cells. Effector cells were separated from peripheral blood by countercurrent centrifugal elutriation. ADCC of monocytes and neutrophilic granulocytes was suppressed by histamine. ADCC of enriched CD3-/56+ NK cells was unchanged by histamine. ADCC of NK cells was effectively inhibited by elutriated monocytes or neutrophils. Histamine completely reversed the inhibition of NK cell-mediated ADCC induced by monocytes and partly reversed the inhibition induced by neutrophils; thereby, histamine augmented ADCC of NK cells in the presence of monocytes or neutrophils. The indirect effect of histamine on ADCC of NK cells and the effect of histamine on ADCC of monocytes/neutrophils were completely antagonized by the specific H2 receptor (H2R) blocker ranitidine. We conclude that activation of H2R suppresses ADCC reactivity of monocytes/neutrophils and, concomitantly, promotes ADCC reactivity of NK cells by abrogating a phagocyte-derived, suppressive signal.

Does gastrin stimulate gastric acid secretion by direct action on oxyntic cells, by releasing histamine, or by being potentiated by histamine? Previous studies in the mouse pointed to gastrin-regulated histamine release. Guinea pig and rat are well known to vary in their sensitivity to histamine. Therefore, the effects of histamine and pentagastrin were compared quantitatively on isolated, lumen-perfused, stomach preparations from these species in the absence and presence of histamine H2-receptor blockade. The loss of potency of histamine in the rat was mirrored by a loss of potency of pentagastrin consistent with the idea that pentagastrin acts by releasing histamine. In the rat, a well-defined pentagastrin curve was obtained in the presence of histamine H2-receptor block as though pentagastrin acts both directly on the oxyntic cell and indirectly by releasing histamine. It was not necessary to invoke a potentiating interaction between histamine and pentagastrin at the oxyntic cell; the two effects appeared simply to add. Potentiation was observed, however, between other combinations of stimuli, for example, between vagal nerve and pentagastrin stimulation. The physiological consequences of these results are discussed.

This study was performed to determine the subtypes of histamine receptors that are involved in the electrophysiological, inotropic and biochemical responses to histamine in isolated rabbit papillary muscles. Histamine increased force of contraction and shortened action potential duration (APD) in a concentration-dependent manner. The former was antagonized by chlorpheniramine, a H1-antagonist, whereas the latter was blocked by cimetidine, a H2-antagonist. However, even when H1-receptors were blocked entirely by chlorpheniramine, histamine still produced a positive inotropic effect, an effect which was antagonized by cimetidine. On the other hand, when H2-receptors were eliminated by cimetidine, histamine caused a H1-receptor mediated APD prolongation. Carbachol attenuated the decrease in APD but not the increase in force of contraction caused by histamine. Cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP levels both were elevated significantly by histamine. The increase in cyclic AMP level induced by histamine was abolished by cimetidine, but not altered by chlorpheniramine, whereas the converse was true for the increase in cyclic GMP level. Additionally, histamine produced a significant stimulation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis as measured by [3H]inositol monophosphate accumulation, although its extent was far less than that produced by carbachol. The phosphoinositide response to histamine was blocked by chlorpheniramine. These data suggest that H1- and H2-receptors coexist in rabbit ventricles. Stimulation of H1- and H2-receptors with histamine independently sets off the biochemical responses linked specifically to the respective subtypes of histamine receptors. On the other hand, the inotropic and electrophysiological responses to histamine are governed predominantly by H1- and H2-receptors, respectively, and this results in an apparent restriction of the expression of the responses mediated by another subtype.

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) is recognized as a major activating signal for human natural killer (NK) cells. The presence of monocytes alters NK cell responsiveness to IL-2. Thus, while IL-2 effectively augments NK cell cytotoxicity (NKCC) in monocyte-depleted NK effector cells, it is relatively ineffective or even suppressive for NK cells in monocyte-containing, NK-cell-enriched mononuclear cell fractions. Here we report that concomitant treatment with IL-2 and the biogenic amine histamine synergistically augmented NKCC against K562 and Daudi target cells of CD3-/CD16+ human NK cells in the presence but not in the absence of monocytes. Addition of peripheral-blood monocytes, recovered by countercurrent centrifugal elutriation, to purified NK cells abrogated IL-2 induced NK cell activation, reconstituted the synergistic, NK-activating effects of histamine and IL-2, and strongly reduced baseline NKCC. The effects of histamine on baseline NKCC and on NK cell responsiveness to IL-2 were related to counteraction of monocyte-mediated NK cell suppression. By contrast, histamine did not affect baseline or IL-2-induced NKCC in mixtures of NK cells and monocytes when the latter cells were recovered after adherence. The effect of histamine on NK cell responsiveness to IL-2 was mediated by H2-type histamine receptors, as judged by mimicry exerted by the specific H2 receptor agonist dimaprit, but not by an H2-receptor-inactive derivative of this compound, N-methyldimaprit, and blocking by the H2 receptor antagonist ranitidine. Experiments in which monocytes and nonadherent NK cells were separately pretreated with ranitidine prior to histamine treatment suggested that NK-regulatory effects of histamine were mediated by H2 receptors on monocytes. Our data suggest that histamine may provide an important signal in the regulation of NK cell responsiveness to IL-2.

The chemical tools that could be used to examine the function of histamine in the brain are considered together with the evidence linking histamine specifically with the hypothalamus. The distribution of histamine and the enzymes responsible for its synthesis and metabolism is consistent with there being both mast cells and histaminergic nerve terminals within the hypothalamus. Iontophoresis, mepyramine binding and histamine-stimulated adenylate cyclase studies suggest that both histamine H1- and H2- receptors are present in the hypothalamus. In addition, intracerebroventricularly injected histamine receptor agonists and antagonists affect many functions associated with the hypothalamus such as cardiovascular control, food intake, body temperature control, and pituitary hormones whose release is mediated via the hypothalamus, such as corticotropin, growth hormone, thyroid stimulating hormone, prolactin, gonadotropins and vasopressin. However, only in the case of thyroliberin release, prolactin release, body fluid control and blood pressure control is there evidence yet that such effects are mediated via histamine receptors actually in the hypothalamus. The effects of enzyme inhibitors suggest endogenous histamine may be involved in the physiological control of thyroid stimulating hormone, growth hormone and blood pressure, and the effects of receptor antagonists support a role for endogenous histamine in prolactin control. Otherwise, there is little evidence for a physiological role for endogenous, as against exogenous, histamine whether it be from histaminergic terminals or mast cells. In addition, few studies have tried to distinguish possible effects on presynaptic receptors, postsynaptic receptors, hypothalamic blood vessels or the hypophyseal portal blood vessels. It is concluded that although there is good evidence now linking histamine and the hypothalamus more specific studies are required, for instance using microinjection or in vitro techniques and the more specific chemical tools now available, to enable a clearer understanding of the physiological role of histamine in the hypothalamus.

The effect of cimetidine on basal and histamine-induced PTH secretion was tested using single cell suspensions obtained from (a) primary parathyroid adenomas, and (b) secondary hyperplastic parathyroid tissue from patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. The histamine-stimulated hormone secretion was dose-dependent. Cimetidine suppressed both basal and histamine-stimulated hormone secretion. Within the therapeutic range the suppressive effect was identical for adenoma and hyperplasia. Both adenomata and secondary hyperplastic glands showed a histamine H2-receptor-related response. The role of histamine in the pathogenesis of hyperparathyroidism is not quite clear so that the possible benefits of cimetidine for medical treatment of primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism will have to be proven by careful clinical trials.

Mitogens and antigens have been the traditional ligands for activating lymphocytes in vitro for the elaboration of lymphokines. Recently, histamine, by interaction with histamine-type 2 receptors on T lymphocytes, has been found to induce the production of one lymphokine, histamine-induced suppressor factor (HSF), that inhibits lymphocyte proliferation and lymphokine production in vitro. Because the biologic effects of HSF appear to be confined to alterations in lymphocyte function, we assessed the ability of soluble products of histamine-stimulated human blood mononuclear cells to affect another lymphocyte function, motility. Utilizing a modified Boyden chamber assay to assess lymphocyte migration, we identified chemoattractant activity for human blood and rat splenic T lymphocytes in histamine-induced mononuclear cell supernatants. No neutrophil or monocyte chemoattractant activity was present. Sephadex G-100 gel filtration of histamine-induced supernatants showed the lymphotactic activity eluted with a 56,000 m.w. This activity was cationic as determined by its elution pattern from a Sephadex QAE anion exchange matrix with a single pl of 9.0 to 9.4 determined by isoelectric focusing in sucrose. Its biologic activity is predominantly chemokinetic in nature, is stable to heating at 56 degrees C for 30 min, but is sensitive to the effects of trypsin and neuraminidase. These physicochemical and functional characteristics establish it as identical to a recently described concanavalin A-induced (Con A) lymphotactic lymphokine (LCF). Mononuclear cells that did not adhere to a histamine affinity matrix were unable to produce LCF when subsequently stimulated with histamine or Con A. Mononuclear cells incubated with histamine and diphenhydramine produced LCF; the addition of cimetidine eliminated LCF production. In fact, supernatants from cells incubated with histamine and cimetidine significantly inhibited lymphocyte migration, a phenomenon explainable by the two regions of lymphocyte migration inhibitory activity that were present in the Sephadex G-100 chromatography of crude histamine-induced supernatants. These data suggest that a subset of lymphocytes defined by the presence of histamine-type 2 receptors is capable of producing LCF while cells that bear histamine-type 1 receptors produce lymphocyte migration inhibitory activity.

Histamine has been shown to increase renal blood flow via H1- and H2-receptors. Furthermore, H2-receptors have been demonstrated to attenuate stimulation-induced release of norepinephrine. The present studies examined whether histamine has a presynaptic effect on sympathetic nerves in the canine renal vascular bed. Renal blood flow was measured in anesthetized dogs, and vasoconstrictor responses to renal nerve stimulation and i.a. injections of norepinephrine were compared before and during i.a. infusions of histamine. Histamine increased renal blood flow and decreased stimulation-induced vasoconstriction to a greater degree than norepinephrine responses. 2-(2-pyridyl)ethylamine, an H1-agonist, did not produce consistent effects. Dimaprit, an H2-agonist, produced responses similar to histamine but to a lesser extent. The H1-antagonist tripelennamine and the H2-antagonist cimetidine each minimally antagonized the effect of histamine on nerve stimulation. When both blocking agents were infused together, maximum antagonism of histamine occurred. Thus, it appears that histamine will produce a neuroinhibitory effect in the canine renal vascular bed and this effect appears to be mediated by both H1- and H2-receptors because both receptor antagonists are necessary to block this effect.

Homologous loss of histamine H2-receptor activity (cAMP generation) was observed after short-term (10-20 min) or chronic treatment (6 days) of cultured HGT-1 cells with histamine (desensitization) or the H2-receptor antagonist SKF 93479. This inactivation process was not observed when HGT-1 cells were exposed to the classical H2-antihistamine cimetidine. The data show: (1) that the compound SKF 93479 has a very prolonged inhibitory action on histamine receptor activity, suggesting an irreversible interaction between the antagonist and the receptor; (2) that cimetidine is a reversible H2-receptor antagonist which can be removed without changing the the efficacy and the potency of histamine on gastric cells; (3) that the H2-receptor antagonists cimetidine and SKF 93479 specifically block histamine H2-receptor activity in HGT-1 cells since cAMP generation induced by other hormones such as vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), glucagon or gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP) was unchanged after treatment; (4) the first evidence for time-dependent (half-life: 20 min) desensitization of gastric H2-receptors.

To detect a potential defect in immunoregulatory function in atopic subjects, we studied histamine-induced suppressor-T-cell activity and histamine Type 1 and Type 2 receptors on T cells. Peripheral-blood mononuclear cells from 16 atopic subjects generated less histamine-induced suppressor activity than did those from 20 nonatopic normal controls (P less than 0.005). The percentage of T lymphocytes bearing histamine Type 2 receptors was lower in the atopic group than in the control group (P less than 0.001), but the percentage of cells with Type 1 receptors was the same in both groups. In the atopic subjects, the functional suppressor-cell abnormality positively correlated with the decreased phenotypic expression of histamine Type 2 receptors. No abnormality in concanavalin A-induced suppressor activity was detected in these subjects. Nonatopic control subjects with systemic mastocytosis had normal functional and phenotypic data, suggesting that chronic activation of atopic T cells in vivo by circulating histamine does not explain the abnormal histamine-induced suppressor response.

Histamine induced a concentration-dependent increase in intracellular cyclic-AMP of the two human melanoma cell lines SK23 and DX3.LT5.1; maximal stimulation was obtained with 17.8 microM histamine which consistently produced greater than 50-fold increases in the cyclic AMP content of both cell lines. The dose-response curve for histamine in each culture was progressively displaced to the right with increasing concentrations of the histamine H2 receptor antagonist cimetidine. Ranitidine, another H2 receptor antagonist also prevented the histamine-induced cyclic AMP elevation, but the H1 receptor antagonists mepyramine and tripelennamine had no significant effect. These findings indicate that human melanoma cells express histamine H2 receptors, stimulation of which activates adenylate cyclase with a subsequent rise in intracellular cyclic AMP. Mast cell:melanoma interactions mediated by histamine in vivo might therefore be expected to modify some aspects of melanoma cell behaviour.

Functional and specific histamine H2 receptors were characterized in human peripheral monocytes and in U-937 cells, before and after retinoic acid--induced differentiation into monocyte/macrophage-like cells. The relative potencies of histamine and the H1, H2 receptor agonists and antagonists studied are remarkably similar in U-937 cells and U-937 monocytes. There is no change in histamine concentration and activity of the enzymes forming and degrading histamine during monocytic-like differentiation. The results raise the possibility that histamine H2 receptors might be involved in pathophysiological regulations (proliferation/differentiation and biological function) of normal and leukemic monocytes.

The stimulatory effect of histamine: H (1.2 to 3-fold increase) on serotonin (5-HT) uptake by human platelets was observed after a 5 min incubation period in the presence of 2.5 X 10(-7) M histamine, followed by subsequent 5 min incubation of the platelets with 10(-7) M [3H] 5-HT. Methyl, ethyl and acetyl substituents in the side chain of H mimicked the stimulatory effect of H. In contrast, H analogs methylated at the position N-1 of the imidazole ring of H, as well as imidazole and histidine inhibited platelet 5-HT uptake. The cAMP-inducing agents forskolin and theophylline have no effect on 5-HT uptake when they are tested alone or in combinations with H. In contrast, the cGMP-inducing agent sodium nitroprusside (10(-7) M-10(-6) M) stimulated and potentiated H-mediated up-regulation of 5-HT uptake. Histamine H2 receptor agonists and antagonists are more potent than drugs acting on H1 receptors (H2 greater than H1). However, the inhibition constants Ki are not consistent with those determined for typical H1, H2, H3 receptors characterized in other tissues. This findings provide further evidence for the existence of multiple forms of H receptors and suggest the involvement of a subpopulation of H2 receptors, highly sensitive to H2 receptor antagonists (H2h), mediating 5-HT uptake in human platelets.

Histamine produced a time-dependent (half-life: 20 min at 37 degrees C), temperature-dependent (no effect at 20 degrees C) and homologous desensitization of histamine H2 receptor activity (H2 R) in HGT-1 cells. Maximal and half-maximal desensitization were respectively observed at 10(-5) and 2 X 10(-7) M histamine. Decline of responsiveness in intact cells was related to a remarkable loss in histamine efficacy (from 15- to 2-fold stimulation in control and treated cells). The affinity of the H2R for histamine (EC50 = 10(-5) M) did not change during desensitization. Paradoxically, histamine treatment is associated with increased [3H] histamine binding capacity in intact HGT-1 cells, and no change in H2 receptor antagonist binding ([3H]-tiodine and [3H]-SKF 93479). Desensitization process was preferentially mimicked by H2 receptor agonists (impromidine greater than histamine greater than AET greater than PEA) and preferentially reversed by simultaneous addition of H2 receptor antagonists (cimetidine greater than DPH). We suggest that the desensitization of H2R activity by histamine presented here may be involved in the pathophysiological regulation and pharmacological control of gastric cell function in man.