Search

Study Objectives: To assess the consequences of nitrate withdrawal in angina-free and hemodynamically stable coronary patients., Design: Prospective, open, intervention study., Setting: Cardiology outpatient clinic of a university-affiliated municipal hospital., Patients: Angina-free patients who were hemodynamically stable for at least 3 months before study onset were enrolled. They were all regularly receiving nitrates for symptom control. Those with significant reasons to avoid stopping nitrates, such as heart failure (ejection fraction <35%) or high BP (> 160 mm Hg systolic and/or > 100 mm Hg diastolic), and noncompliant patients were excluded., Interventions: After providing informed consent and undergoing an exercise test (whenever possible), the participants were randomized to abruptly discontinue (study group) or continue (control group) nitrate treatment. Follow-up continued for at least 3 months after study entry., Measurements and Results: Eighty patients were randomized to the study group and 40 patients to the control group (mean age [+/- 1 SD], 65.5 +/- 11 years and 66.1 +/- 10.9 years, respectively; p = not significant). The first month, eight study patients (10%) had a recurrence of anginal symptoms, compared with one control subject (2.5%) [p = not significant]. All eight patients responded promptly and favorably to the resumption of nitrate administration., Conclusions: Nitrate administration can be safely discontinued in angina-free and hemodynamically stable coronary patients who receive this medication on a regular basis. If relapse of anginal symptoms occurs, it will be within 1 month following nitrate withdrawal, and will resolve satisfactorily with reinstatement of treatment.

Background: The natural polyamine Agmatine (Ag) plays a significant role in protection of nerve cell ischemic injury. A previous report indicated that Ag given intraperitoneally to rats enhanced the recovery of the heart from ischemic injury. Based on this initial observation, a larger investigation was undertaken to explore a dose-response effect and possible mechanisms underlying the protective effects.Methods: Using the modified Langendorff model, 36 isolated hearts were divided into five groups: group 1, hearts receiving 100 microM/L Ag pre-ischemia (n=7); group 2, hearts receiving 100 microM/L Ag pre- and post-ischemia, (n=7); group 3, hearts receiving 250 microM/L Ag pre-ischemia (n=7); group 4, hearts receiving 250 microM/L Ag pre- and postischemia (n=7); and group 5, hearts receiving Krebs-Hensleit solution served as control (n=8). The study design included 20 minutes of perfusion, 30 minutes of global ischemia, and 30 minutes of reperfusion.Results: After ischemia, group 2 developed higher left ventricular pressure P(max) (P<0.01), improved first-derivative of the rise (dP/dt max; P<0.02), and fall (dP/dt min; P<0.04) in left ventricular pressure, and the area calculated under the left-ventricle developed pressure curve (pressure-time integral; P<0.015), but coronary flow was not significantly increased (P=0.06) compared to the control group. Group 1 had improved diastolic recovery: dP/dt min (P<0.05) and coronary flow (P<0.03), compared with the control group. Group 3 had improved P(max) (P<0.01), dP/dt min (P<0.01), and coronary flow (P<0.02); group 4 had no improvement in all hemodynamic parameters.Conclusion: Low doses of Ag given pre- and post-ischemia, and high doses given only pre-ischemia have favorable, protective effects on the hemodynamic recovery of isolated rat heart undergoing global ischemia and reperfusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a study on the effects of agmatine on ischemic and nonischemic isolated rat hearts. It is observed that agmatine caused a significant increase in coronary flow rate throughout the reperfusion period. The study has concluded that agmatine injection given before induced ischemia improves hemodynamic recovery by mechanisms that may be attributed to its vasodilatory properties.

Twenty patients with DDD pacemakers had their infracranial cerebral circulation assessed in different pacing modes, using transcranial Doppler. The studies were performed at the vertebral artery in a sitting position. Although DDD pacing was prefered to VVl pacing in 18 of the 20 patients, the figures did not reach statistical significance. There was no statistical difference in maximal blood flow velocity between DDD pacing at 60 and 80 beats/min. Varying the AV interval from 150-250 msec also demonstrated no clear difference in maxima] peak Doppler velocity, in the group as a whole, though there was a greater individual preference for 150 msec. Transcranial Doppler assessment of the hemodynamics of the cerebral circulation is of limited value as an indicator of mode or rate preference in the pacemaker population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]