Search

Background: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are malignant diseases arising from hematopoietic stem cells. Their overall incidence is 4 cases per 100 000 persons per year, and they are usually diagnosed when evaluating cytopenia. The median survival time is three years. Myelodysplastic syndromes take a variable course; one-quarter of patients go on to develop acute leukemia., Methods: This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective search of the literature from 2013 to 2022, including relevant guidelines, in the PubMed database. The time period was chosen to reflect developments since the publication of the latest EHA guidelines in 2013., Results: The gold standard of diagnosis is cytomorphology of the blood and bone marrow, supplemented by banding cytogenetics, histomorphology, and somatic mutation analyses. The new classification proposed by the WHO incorporates the molecular and cytogenetic findings. The Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M), which takes somatic mutations into account, is now available as an aid to prognostication. Quality of life evaluation with standardized instruments is helpful in many ways. Low-risk patients are treated supportively with erythrocyte transfusions and iron chelation therapy. Erythropoietin-a can be given to patients whose erythropoietin level is less than 200ng/mL, lenalidomide to those with a 5q deletion, and luspatercept to those with an SF3B1 mutation. High-risk patients should be evaluated as early as possible for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with curative intent. 5-azacytidine improves outcomes in patients for whom stem cell transplantation is not suitable., Conclusion: Once a precise diagnosis has been established, new prognostic instruments such as the IPSS-M enable risk-adapted treatment based on the biological aspects of the patient's disease as well as his or her age and comorbidities.

Despite scientific evidence originating from two patients published to date that CCR5Δ32/Δ32 hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can cure human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), the knowledge of immunological and virological correlates of cure is limited. Here we characterize a case of long-term HIV-1 remission of a 53-year-old male who was carefully monitored for more than 9 years after allogeneic CCR5Δ32/Δ32 HSCT performed for acute myeloid leukemia. Despite sporadic traces of HIV-1 DNA detected by droplet digital PCR and in situ hybridization assays in peripheral T cell subsets and tissue-derived samples, repeated ex vivo quantitative and in vivo outgrowth assays in humanized mice did not reveal replication-competent virus. Low levels of immune activation and waning HIV-1-specific humoral and cellular immune responses indicated a lack of ongoing antigen production. Four years after analytical treatment interruption, the absence of a viral rebound and the lack of immunological correlates of HIV-1 antigen persistence are strong evidence for HIV-1 cure after CCR5Δ32/Δ32 HSCT., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only curative treatment for patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and secondary acute myelogenous leukemia (sAML), but in the absence of prospective trials the impact of pretransplant cytoreduction is controversially discussed. We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of 165 patients with MDS and excess blasts (n = 126, 76%) and sAML (n = 39, 24%) according to a pretransplant strategy. Sixty-seven patients (41%) were directly transplanted (upfront group), whereas 98 patients (59%) had received pretransplant cytoreductive treatment (induction chemotherapy [CTX], n = 64; hypomethylating agents [HMAs], n = 34) resulting in a significantly higher complete remission rate in the CTX group (59% versus HMA 18%, P < .0001). Estimated rates of 5-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) for the entire group were 54% and 39%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates of the upfront, CTX, and HMA groups were 61%, 50%, and 45%, respectively (P = .116), whereas RFS rates were 38%, 41%, and 38% (P = .926). Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) did not differ between treatment groups. In the upfront group no difference regarding OS and RFS was seen with respect to pretransplant blast count (>10% versus <10%). In multivariate analyses type of pretransplant strategy did not have an effect on OS, RFS, CIR, and NRM, whereas cytogenetics (OS, RFS, CIR), reduced-intensity conditioning (OS, RFS, CIR), and an unrelated donor (RFS, CIR) were identified as negative predictors. When compared with the upfront group, 5-year OS was significantly lower in patients with CTX-refractory disease (34% versus 64%, P = .0346) and by clear trend in HMA nonresponders (42% versus 61%, P = .073), whereas RFS did not differ significantly. In further support of the concept, that pretransplant therapy may favor the selection of resistant clones, patients in the upfront group had a higher likelihood to respond to HMAs as salvage therapy for relapse in comparison with pretreated patients (complete remission, 58% versus 10%; P = .0005) and a higher 2-year OS rate after relapse (59% versus 19%, P = .0001). These data suggest that an upfront transplant strategy is at least not inferior to pretransplant cytoreduction and may be augmented by HMAs + donor lymphocyte infusion salvage therapy in case of relapse after allo-HSCT., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) cures a considerable number of patients with myeloid malignancies, but relapse is the most frequent cause of death. We retrospectively studied relapse rate, kinetics, treatment, and outcome after first aHSCT in 446 patients during a 13-year period. Relapse occurred in 167 patients after a median of 4.6 months (116 hematologic (HR), 38 molecular (MR), and 13 extramedullary relapses (XR)). Median survival after relapse was 8.4 months and 2-year overall survival was 25%. Regarding survival after relapse, type (MR/HR/XR) and timepoint of relapse ( 12 months), age ( 50), diagnosis (MDS/AML and sAML), and remission status at transplant (CR and untreated MDS vs. refractory disease) were relevant in univariate analyses, in multivariate analyses timepoint, and type of relapse, age, and diagnosis. One hundred fifty-six patients were treated, most frequently with hypomethylating agents (HMA, n = 109) or intensive chemotherapy (n = 12). Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) was administered to 99 patients. Second aHSCT was performed in three patients as first and in 21 as higher salvage treatment. A complete remission (CR) was achieved in 46 patients (30%). Among CR patients, 65% had received HMA and DLI. Median survival of patients achieving CR was 105 months and 2-year overall survival was 80%. We conclude that with HMA and DLI or second aHSCT, a substantial number of patients, who relapse after aHSCT, can re-achieve remission and long-term survival. Techniques to further improve the detection of minimal residual disease are urgently needed because early treatment of MR results in significantly better survival.

In contrast to the evidence regarding azacitidine (Aza), there is limited knowledge about the combination of decitabine (DAC) and donor lymphocyte infusions as salvage therapy for relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) so far. We retrospectively analyzed data of 36 patients with hematological (n = 35) or molecular relapse (n = 1) of acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n = 29) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS, n = 7) collected from 6 German transplant centers. Patients were treated with a median of 2 cycles DAC (range, 1 to 11). DAC was the first salvage therapy in 16 patients (44%), whereas 20 patients (56%) had previously received 1 to 5 lines of salvage therapy including 16 of them had been treated with Aza. In 22 patients (61%), a median of 2 DLI per patient (range, 1 to 5) was administered in addition to DAC. As a result, overall response rate was 25% including 6 complete remissions (CR, 17%) and 3 partial remissions (PR, 8%). Three patients within the first-line group achieved CR, while also 3 patients receiving DAC as second-line treatment reached CR including 2 patients with previous Aza failure. Median duration of CR was 10 months (range, 2 to 33) and no patient relapsed so far. The 2-year OS rate was 11% (± 6%) without any difference between first-line and pretreated patients. Incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease was 19 and 5%. Taken together, DAC exerts clinical efficacy in patients with AML or MDS relapsing after allo-SCT and is able to induce durable remissions in individual patients suggesting that DAC may be an alternative to Aza or even a second choice after Aza failure.

We studied the impact of comorbidities on survival and evaluated the prognostic utility of comorbidity scores in MDS patients, who received best supportive care and were assessable according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCTCI): 171 patients were identified in the Duesseldorf MDS Registry. The HCTCI captured more comorbidities. Both scoring systems had prognostic relevance, but the HCTCI more clearly distinguished between low-, intermediate- and high-risk patients. Median survival times of the different risk groups according to the HCTCI were 68, 34 and 25 months, respectively. The HCTCI showed prognostic impact in the IPSS intermediate- and high-risk group. On multivariate regression analysis, only the HCTCI remained a prognostic factor independent of IPSS. Considering their prognostic impact, comorbidities of MDS patients should receive appropriate attention in clinical trials as well as day-to-day clinical decision making.

Simple Summary: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is the only potentially curative treatment option for patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies. Depending on the underlying genetic risk profile, up to 50% of patients die of relapse even after aHSCT in first remission. Therefore, further improvement of conditioning regimens is an urgent medical need. Current sequential conditioning regimens combine intensive AML-like induction therapy with total body irradiation or alkylators like treosulfan or melphalan. The first and currently widely accepted prototype of this treatment strategy is the fludarabine/amsacrine/ara-C (FLAMSA) protocol, which has been modified multiple times by changing parts or adding additional cytotoxic drugs to improve clinical results. Knowing that venetoclax, an inhibitor of B-cell lymphoma-2 protein (BCL2), has synergistic effects to chemotherapy without increasing the level of non-hematologic toxicity, several German transplant centers have added venetoclax to the FLAMSA protocol as an individualized treatment approach to improve long term outcome in patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies. Up to 50% of patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies die of relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Current sequential conditioning regimens like the FLAMSA protocol combine intensive induction therapy with TBI or alkylators. Venetoclax has synergistic effects to chemotherapy. In a retrospective survey among German transplant centers, we identified 61 patients with myeloid malignancies that had received FLAMSA-based sequential conditioning with venetoclax between 2018 and 2022 as an individualized treatment approach. Sixty patients (98%) had active disease at transplant and 74% had genetic high-risk features. Patients received allografts from matched unrelated, matched related, or mismatched donors. Tumor lysis syndrome occurred in two patients but no significant non-hematologic toxicity related to venetoclax was observed. On day +30, 55 patients (90%) were in complete remission. Acute GvHD II°–IV° occurred in 17 (28%) and moderate/severe chronic GvHD in 7 patients (12%). Event-free survival and overall survival were 64% and 80% at 1 year as well as 57% and 75% at 2 years, respectively. The off-label combination of sequential FLAMSA-RIC with venetoclax appears to be safe and highly effective. To further validate these insights and enhance the idea of smart conditioning, a controlled prospective clinical trial was initiated in July 2023. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights • WT1 mRNA expression level is applicable as MRD marker in most patients with AML and MDS. • WT1 mRNA expression level is measurable by a standardized assay providing a validated cutoff level. • WT1 mRNA expression level is measurable in peripheral blood and therefore coherent with high patient comfort. • WT1 mRNA expression level predicts relapse after allo-HSCT with a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 97%. • In 62% of cases, overexpression of WT1 led to earlier BM biopsy and diagnosis of relapse. Abstract Overexpression of the Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) gene is informative in many patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and is measurable in peripheral blood (PB). Despite these advantages, WT1 has not broadly been established as a marker for minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) due to limited patient numbers, differing sample sources, and nonstandardized in-house methods. To estimate the value of WT1 as an MRD marker, we serially quantified PB WT1 expression using a standardized European LeukemiaNet-certified assay in 59 patients with AML and MDS after allo-HSCT. We compared its performance with routine methods such as chimerism, XY-fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), disease-specific cytogenetic, and molecular analyses, which were accessible in 100%, 34%, 68%, and 37%, respectively. Twenty-four patients (41%) relapsed within a median of 126 days after allo-HSCT, and 20 of them showed at least 1 elevated WT1 value above the validated cutoff. The other 35 patients (59%) remained in complete remission, and only 1 patient had a transient increase in WT1 expression. This reflects a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 97% for WT1 and appears to be favorable compared with the sensitivities and specificities observed for chimerism (33% and 91%), XY-FISH (67% and 73%), cytogenetic (33% and 77%), and molecular (78% and 85%) analyses. Further supporting its predictive impact, elevated WT1 expression prompted an earlier BM biopsy and consecutively the diagnosis of relapse in 62% of patients. The results of this real-life experience imply that PB WT1 expression is measurable by a standardized assay and predicts imminent relapse after allo-HSCT with high sensitivity and specificity in most patients with AML and MDS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]