Search

Background: The (13) C-urea breath test ((13) C-UBT) is a safe, noninvasive and reliable method for diagnosing H. pylori infection in adults. However, the test has shown variable accuracy in the pediatric population, especially in young children. We aimed to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the performance of the (13) C-UBT diagnostic test for H. pylori infection in children., Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the PubMed, Embase and Liliacs databases including studies from January 1998 to May 2009. Selection criteria included studies with at least 30 children and reporting the comparison of (13) C-UBT against a gold standard for H. pylori diagnosis. Thirty-one articles and 135 studies were included for analysis. Children were stratified in subgroups of <6 and ≥6 years of age, and we considered variables such as type of meal, cutoff value, tracer dose, and delta time for the analysis., Discussion: The (13) C-UBT performance meta-analyses showed 1, good accuracy in all ages combined (sensitivity 95.9%, specificity 95.7%, LR+ 17.4, LR- 0.06, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) 424.9), 2, high accuracy in children >6 years (sensitivity 96.6%, specificity 97.7%, LR+ 42.6, LR- 0.04, DOR 1042.7), 3, greater variability in accuracy estimates and on average a few percentage points lower, particularly specificity, in children ≤6 years (sensitivity 95%, specificity 93.5%, LR+ 11.7, LR- 0.12, DOR 224.8). Therefore, the meta-analysis shows that the (13) C-UBT test is less accurate for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection in young children, but adjusting cutoff value, pretest meal, and urea dose, this accuracy can be improved., (© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Objective: Helicobacter pylori antigen or DNA in stool are meant to detect the bacteria; however, in children the colonization of the gastric mucosa by H pylori is usually weak and fecal excretion of antigen or DNA varies considerably, challenging the utility of these tests in this age group. The aim of the present study was to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the performance of stool H pylori DNA and antigen tests for the diagnosis of infection in children., Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the accuracy of stool tests for diagnosis of H pylori infection in children. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and LILACS databases. Selection criteria included participation of at least 30 children and the use of a criterion standard for H pylori diagnosis. In a comprehensive search, we identified 48 studies., Results: Regarding antigen-detection tests, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) monoclonal antibodies showed the best performance, with sensitivity and specificity of 97%, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 29.9, and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.03. ELISA polyclonal antibodies had sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 93%, LR+ of 16.2, LR- of 0.09, and high heterogeneity (P < 0.0001). One-step monoclonal antibody tests demonstrated sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 93%, LR+ of 10.6, and LR- of 0.11. For DNA detection, polymerase chain reaction-based test showed sensitivity of 80.8%, specificity of 98%, LR+ of 17.1, and LR- of 0.18., Conclusions: Detection of H pylori antigen in stools with ELISA monoclonal antibodies is a noninvasive efficient test for diagnosis of infection in children. One-step tests showed low accuracy and more studies are needed to obtain a useful office-based screening test. The available molecular tests are still unreliable.

Background: Numerous serologic tests are available for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection in children. Common designs of antibody-based detection tests are ELISA and Western Blot (WB). For developing countries with limited laboratory resources and access, ELISA would be the preferred method because of its simplicity, lower cost and speed. Although in adults ELISA has proven to be highly accurate in diagnosing H. pylori infection; in children, it has shown variable accuracy., Methods/findings: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the accuracy of antibody-based detection tests for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection in children. Selection criteria included participation of at least 30 children and the use of a gold standard for H. pylori diagnosis. In a comprehensive search we identified 68 studies. Subgroup analyses were carried out by technique, immunoglobulin class, and source of test (commercial and in-house). The results demonstrated: 1) WB tests showed high overall performance, sensitivity 91.3% (95% CI, 88.9-93.3), specificity 89% (95% CI, 85.7-91.9), LR+ 8.2 (95% CI, 5.1-13.3), LR- 0.06 (95% CI, 0.02-0.16), DOR 158.8 (95% CI, 57.8-435.8); 2) ELISA-IgG assays showed low sensitivity 79.2% (95% CI, 77.3-81.0) and high specificity (92.4%, 95% CI, 91.6-93.3); 3) ELISA commercial tests varied widely in performance (test for heterogeneity p<0.0001); and 4) In-house ELISA with whole-cell antigen tests showed the highest overall performance: sensitivity 94% (95% CI, 90.2-96.7), specificity 96.4% (95% CI, 94.2-97.9), LR+ 19.9 (95% CI, 7.9-49.8), LR- 0.08 (95% CI, 0.04-0.15) DOR 292.8 (95% CI, 101.8-841.7)., Conclusions/significance: WB test and in-house ELISA with whole-cell antigen tests are the most reliable tests for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection in children. Antigens obtained from local strains of the community could partially explain the good overall accuracy of the in-house ELISA. Because of its cost and technical demands, in-house ELISA might be more suitable for use in developing countries.