Search

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is an important and serious postoperative complication after heart transplantation. We sought to characterize in‐hospital VTE after heart transplantation and its association with clinical outcomes. Method: Adult (≧18 years) patients undergoing heart transplantation from 2015 to 2019 at our center were retrospectively reviewed. Post‐transplant VTE was defined as newly diagnosed venous system thrombus by imaging studies. Results: There were 254 patients. The cohort's median age was 55 years. A total of 61 patients were diagnosed with VTE, including one with right atrial thrombus, 54 with upper extremity DVT in which one patient subsequently developed PE, four with lower extremity DVT, and two with upper and lower extremity DVT. The cumulative incidence of VTE was 42% at 60‐days of post heart transplant. Patients with VTE had longer hospital stay (P <.001), higher in‐hospital mortality (P =.010), and worse 5‐year survival (P =.009). On the multivariable Cox analysis, history of DVT/PE and intubation for more than 3 days were associated with an increased risk of in hospital VTE. Conclusion: The incidence of VTE in heart transplant recipients is high. Post‐transplant surveillance, and appropriate preventive measures and treatment strategies after diagnosis are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: When left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy no longer is able to achieve patients' desired quality of life, withdrawal of LVAD therapy (WLVAD) may be requested. Objectives: To evaluate factors associated with WLVAD, including the time taken before WLVAD. Setting/Subjects: Sixty-two patients who newly underwent initial LVAD therapy during January 1, 2010 and October 30, 2018 and subsequently underwent WLVAD by December 31, 2018 were divided into those who participated in the decision of WLVAD (defined as PT+, n = 14), and those who could not participate in the decision because of the medical reasons (defined as PT−, n = 48). Measurements: Time to WLVAD in PT+ and PT− was defined as WD_PT+ (days between patients' request and WLVAD) and WD_PT− (days between when patients became unable to express themselves and WLVAD), respectively. Circumstances around WLVAD, including location of death and use of palliative care (PC), were reviewed. Results: Mean age at WLVAD was 65.4 ± 10.1 years and 52 (83.9%) were men. Median days on LVAD support was 166.5 days (interquartile range = 838). The majority of WLVAD occurred in the intensive care unit (ICU) (83.6%) but less frequent in PT+ than in PT− (64.3% vs. 89.4%, p = 0.041). The median number of PC visits in the last month was higher in PT+ than in PT− (4.5 vs. 0.5, p = 0.005). The median WD_PT+ was 5.5 days and was significantly shorter in the ICU (1 day vs. 46 days, p = 0.013). The median WD_PT− was 5.5 days and tended to be shorter in the ICU (4 days vs. 13 days, p = 0.072). A multivariate analysis showed that male gender and ICU setting were both negatively associated with WD_PT− (p = 0.025 for men, p = 0.005 for ICU setting). Conclusions: The majority of WLVAD occurred in the ICU and required PC involvement. Time to WLVAD was shorter in the ICU. Requests for WLVAD directly made by patients, especially in a non-ICU setting, seemed to have posed more difficulty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Little is known about palliative care consultation (PCC) for patients with cardiogenic shock requiring short-term mechanical circulatory support (STMCS). Objective: To describe the utilization of PCC in this population. Design: Retrospective cohort study in a university medical center intensive care unit (ICU). Setting/Participants: In total, 195 patients aged >18 years with cardiogenic shock requiring STMCS were included. The cohort was divided into three categories: no PCC, early PCC (within seven days of STMCS), and late PCC (eight or more days after STMCS). Follow-up occurred during the index hospitalization. Results: Mean age was 59.3 ± 13.9 years; 67.9% were men. Mean follow-up period was 33.8 ± 37.7 days. Overall inpatient mortality was 52.3%. Ninety-four patients (48.2%) received PCC; 49 (25.1%) and 45 (23.1%) received early and late PCCs, respectively. STMCS duration, ICU stay after STMCS, and hospital stay after STMCS were significantly shorter in the no PCC group than the early PCC group (4 vs. 12 days, p < 0.001; 11 vs. 19 days, p = 0.004; and 16 vs. 19 days, p = 0.031; respectively). ICU stay after STMCS and hospital stay after STMCS were significantly shorter in the early PCC group than the late PCC group (19 vs. 38 days, p < 0.001; 19 vs. 49 days, p < 0.001; respectively). However, time from initial PCC to discharge was not significantly different between early and late PCC groups (18 vs. 31 days, p = 0.13). Conclusions: PCC was utilized in almost half of patients with cardiogenic shock requiring STMCS. PCC tends to occur toward the end of life regardless of the duration of STMCS. The optimal PCC timing remained unclear. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES Previous studies have shown the usefulness of the subcostal exchange of the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device for device malfunction. However, long-term data are still limited. METHODS Between March 2004 and July 2017, 41 of 568 (7.2%) patients who had received a HeartMate II implant at our institution had a device exchange via a subcostal incision. We summarized early and late outcomes. RESULTS Forty-one patients had a total of 48 subcostal pump exchanges. Indications for device exchange included device thrombosis (n  = 31, 76%), driveline infection (n  = 2, 5%) and driveline injury (n  = 8, 19%). All of the procedures were successful, and there were no in-hospital deaths. A Kaplan–Meier survival curve showed 30-day and 1-year survival rates after subcostal exchange of 100% and 94.6%, respectively. However, 10 (25%) patients had left ventricular assist device-related infections following subcostal exchange that included 7 pump pocket infections and 3 driveline infections. Freedom from left ventricular assist device-related infection at 1 year after subcostal exchange was 79.3%. Thirteen (32%) patients had device malfunction due to pump thrombosis that required a 2nd device exchange. Seven patients had recurrent thrombosis. Three (7%) patients had a stroke. Freedom from device thrombosis and from a stroke event at 1 year was 74.4%. CONCLUSIONS Subcostal pump exchange can be safely performed. However, there is a substantial risk of infection and recurrent thrombosis. Careful follow-up for late complications is mandatory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The difference of end-of-life care for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients, between destination therapy (DT) and bridge to transplant (BTT), and the effect of palliative care in this population remain unknown. Objective: The primary outcomes of this retrospective cohort study were the place of death, do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order, palliative care consultation in the last month, and hospice enrollment. Secondary outcomes were time on the LVAD, life-sustaining treatment in the last week of life, LVAD deactivation, and clinical trajectory. Setting/Subjects: Eighty-nine patients who newly underwent LVAD therapy between 2010 and 2016 and died before May 2017 were divided into DT (59) and BTT (30). Results: At death, BTT patients (61.1 ± 8.9 years) were significantly younger (p = 0.046) than DT patients (65.8 ± 12.9 years). Median (25th–75th percentile) time on LVAD was significantly shorter (p = 0.042) in BTT (152 days, 41.3–375.8) than in DT (358 days, 64–892), but the Kaplan–Meier curves were not significantly different (p = 0.055). The place of death (p = 0.092), DNR order (DT; 70.2%, BTT; 76.7%, p = 0.52), palliative care consultation in the last month (DT; 57.1% and BTT; 41.6%, p = 0.22), and hospice enrollment (DT; 8.5%, BTT; 10.0%, p = 1.0), as well as any of secondary outcomes, were not significantly different between groups. After January 2014, palliative care consultation in the last month increased significantly from 14.2% to 78.9% (p < 0.001), and death in intensive care unit decreased significantly (from 79.4% to 52.8%, p = 0.024) with less frequent mechanical ventilation (from 71.4% to 50.0%, p = 0.047) and renal replacement therapy (42.9% to 19.2%, p = 0.017). Conclusions: The clinical course of deceased LVAD patients, circumstances, and treatments at the end of life did not differ significantly between the BTT and DT groups. Palliative care consult seemed associated with less resource utilization. Palliative care team should get involved in the care of LVAD patients, not only for DT but also for BTT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Galectin-3 is a marker of myocardial inflammation and fibrosis shown to correlate with morbidity and mortality in heart failure (HF). We examined the utility of galectin-3 as a marker of the severity of HF, the response of galectin-3 levels to ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation or heart transplantation (HTx), and its use as a prognostic indicator.Methods: Plasma galectin-3 was measured using a commercially available ELISA assay in patients with stable HF (n = 55), severe HF (n = 63), at 3 (n = 17) and 6 (n = 14) months post-LVAD and at LVAD explantation (n = 23), patients following HTx (n = 85) and healthy controls (n = 30).Results: Galectin-3 levels increase with the severity of HF (severe HF: 28.2 ± 14, stable HF: 19.7 ± 13, p = 0.001; controls: 13.2 ± 9 ng/ml, p = 0.02 versus stable HF). Following LVAD implantation, galectin-3 levels are initially lower (3 months: 23.7 ± 9, 6 months: 21.7 ± 9 versus 29.2 ± 14 ng/ml implantation; p = NS) but are higher at explantation (40.4 ± 19 ng/ml; p = 0.005 versus pre-LVAD). Galectin-3 levels >30 ng/ml are associated with lower survival post-LVAD placement (76.5 % versus 95.0 % at 2 years, p = 0.009). After HTx, galectin-3 levels are lower (17.8 ± 7.1 ng/ml post-HTx versus 28.2 ± 14 pre-HTx; p < 0.0001). Patients with coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) post-HTx showed higher galectin-3 levels (20.5 ± 8.8 ng/ml versus 16.8 ± 6.3, p = 0.1) and the degree of CAV correlated with levels of galectin-3 (r (2) = 0.17, p < 0.0001).Conclusions: Galectin-3 is associated with the severity of HF, exhibits dynamic changes during mechanical unloading and predicts survival post-LVAD. Further, galectin-3 is associated with the development on CAV post-HTx. Galectin-3 might serve as a novel biomarker in patients with HF, during LVAD support and following HTx. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Right heart failure (RHF) is an unresolved issue during continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. Little is known about the incidence and clinical significance of late RHF during LVAD support. Methods Between May 2004 and December 2013, 336 patients underwent continuous-flow LVAD implantation. Of these, 293 patients (87%) discharged with isolated LVAD support were included in this study. Late RHF was defined as HF requiring re-admission and medical or surgical intervention after initial surgery. Results Late RHF occurred in 33 patients (11%) at a median of 99 days after discharge (range 19 to 1,357 days). Freedom from late RHF rates were 87%, 84% and 79% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. RHF recurred in 15 patients. Three patients required right ventricular assist device insertion. Univariable Cox proportional hazards regression model showed diabetes mellitus (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.06, p = 0.04), body mass index >29 (HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.24 to 4.94, p = 0.01) and blood urea nitrogen level >41 mg/dl (HR 2.19; 95% CI 1.10 to 4.36; p = 0.025) as significant predictors for late RHF. Estimated on-device survival rates at 2 years were 73% in the RHF group and 82% in the non-RHF group ( p = 0.20). However, overall survival at 2 years was significantly worse in patients who developed late RHF (60% vs 85%, p = 0.016). This reduction was mostly attributed to worse overall outcomes in the bridge-to-transplant (BTT) population. Conclusions Late RHF is common after continuous-flow LVAD implantation, but does not affect survival during LVAD support. However, it is associated with worse overall outcomes in the BTT population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective This study assessed the early and late outcomes after cardiac transplantation in patients receiving long-term continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) support. Methods Between April 2004 and September 2013, 192 patients underwent HeartMate II (Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA) CF-LVAD placement as a bridge to transplant at our center. Of these, 122 (63%) successfully bridged patients were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified into 2 groups according to their waiting time with CF-LVAD support of <1 year or ≥1 year. Results The study cohort was a mean age of 54 ± 13 years, 79% were male, and 35% had an ischemic etiology. The mean duration of CF-LVAD support before transplantation was 296 days (range, 27–1,413 days). The overall 30-day mortality was 4.1%. Overall post-transplant survival was 88%, 84%, 78% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The 32 patients (26%) with ≥1 year of CF-LVAD support (mean, 635 days) were more likely to have blood type O, a larger body size, and to have been readmitted due to recurrent heart failure and device failure requiring exchange than those with <1 year of CF-LVAD support. Patients who required prolonged support time also had worse in-hospital mortality (16% vs 6.7%, p = 0.12) and significantly lower survival at 3 years after transplantation (68% vs 88%, p = 0.049). Conclusions The overall short-term and long-term cardiac transplant outcomes of patients supported with CF-LVAD are satisfactory. However, patients who require prolonged CF-LVAD support may have diminished post-transplant survival due to adverse events occurring during device support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Thrombus formation inside of the pump is a major cause for device malfunction following the left ventricular assist device ( LVAD) implantation. We recently established a novel ramp test protocol facilitating continuous bedside echo monitoring to optimize LVAD function and diagnosing device malfunctions. We describe a case of 29-year-old woman undergoing HeartMate II LVAD implantation, in whom serial ramp studies were used to diagnose intra-device thrombus after device implantation. The 1st ramp study at postoperative day ( POD) 26 revealed adequate reduction in ventricular size according to the increase in LVAD speed (left ventricular end-diastolic diameter [ LVEDD] at minimum and maximum speeds, 68 and 37 mm, respectively). The patient was discharged home and received routine anticoagulation maintenance therapy. However, a 2nd ramp test was performed on POD 56 due to increased lactase dehydrogenase and brain natriuretic peptide levels and showed marked increase in left ventricle (LV) chamber size without adequate response to the LVAD speed changes ( LVEDD at minimum and maximum speeds, 88 and 76 mm, respectively). Given the suspicion for partial pump thrombosis, the patient was immediately hospitalized and received intravenous heparin infusion. After the optimization of the intensive anticoagulation therapy, the patient underwent a 3rd ramp study, which showed a remarkable improvement of the adequate response to LVAD speed changes. The patients eventually underwent cardiac transplant successfully, and the partial clot was found inside of the pump. This case demonstrates the usefulness of serial ramp studies in patients who are suspected to have device thrombosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the results of a study which examines the effect of hemodynamic correction using ventricular assist device (VAD) placement on patients with advanced heart failure (HF). The results showed that serum adiponectin reduced while insulin resistance improved in patients after VAD implantation. The expression of adiponectin in adipose tissue also reduced after VAD placement. Macrophage infiltration in adipose tissue became normal after VAD placement.

Aims Giant cell myocarditis (GCM) carries a poor prognosis and many patients require end-stage therapies. This study sought to determine the outcome of patients bridged with ventricular assist devices (VAD) to orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). Methods and results A retrospective data collection of all patients with GCM was performed. Diagnosis was determined by endomyocardial or explanted heart biopsy. Eight patients were found, but two of those patients went directly to OHT and were excluded. The remaining six patients received VADs, and these patients, aged 44 ± 18 years, were included. Five of the six patients were bridged with biventricular support and one patient was supported by left ventricular assist device (LVAD) alone. Two patients died on device support. Four patients were bridged to OHT 77 ± 42 days after device implantation. All four patients bridged with a VAD are alive, with a mean follow-up of 5.7 ± 4.1 years. Two patients were found to have recurrent GCM in the transplanted heart and were treated successfully with immunosuppression. Three patients had high grade (2R) rejection at 66 ± 52 days post-OHT. Cardiac function was preserved in all patients, and only one patient had cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Conclusion Patients with end-stage GCM can be successfully bridged with VADs to OHT with very good post-OHT survival. The proper immunosuppressive regimen for this group needs further investigation given the frequency of rejection and GCM recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

OBJECTIVE We report our initial experience with our newly developed percutaneous right-ventricular assist device (VAD) with CentriMag (perc CM-RVAD). METHODS A flexible outflow cannula placed from the right internal jugular vein to the pulmonary artery and an inflow cannula placed from the femoral vein to the right atrium constituted the perc CM-RVAD. When needed, biventricular support was provided with left VAD (LVAD), either with a percutaneous LVAD placed through axillary or femoral artery access or with a fully implantable LVAD. RESULTS Between January 2009 and June 2010, all of the attempted patients successfully received perc CM-RVAD (n = 8). Mean blood pressure, heart rate, and central venous pressure showed a trend toward improvement after the perc CM-RVAD, with less inotrope/vasopressor requirement. Mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) increased significantly from 64 ± 20 Torr to 78 ± 6 Torr (P < 0.01). The percutaneous VADs were explanted after myocardial recovery in seven patients; however, in three of these, perc CM-RVAD was used as a temporary bridge to other devices. One patient was bridged to a surgical biventricular assist device (BiVAD) and transferred back to the referring hospital on support. One death occurred due to multiple-organ failure 8 days after explantation of the RVAD with recovery. CONCLUSIONS Perc CM-RVAD was feasible and provided hemodynamic improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: We reviewed the use of pediatric mechanical circulatory support before and after transplantation to examinine current results and future strategies. Methods: All patients listed for transplantation from January 2000 to December 2010 who required either extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or ventricular assist device (VAD) support before (“intention to transplant”) or after transplantation were included. Indications for mechanical assistance, age, weight, duration of support, complications while on support, causes of death, and overall actuarial survival were recorded. Results: Thirty-seven patients were received VADs; 32 (86.5%) survived to transplantation. Postoperative hemorrhagic or thrombotic complications affected all of those under 15 kg. One patient in the survivor cohort demonstrated focal neurologic findings. Three (8.1%) had panel reactive antibody levels of 10% or more while on device support; all received transplants. ECMO as an intention to bridge to transplantation was used in 28 patients; 7 died, 7 were weaned, and 14 were bridged to transplantation. Nineteen patients required ECMO after transplantation; 3 additional patients had percutaneous VAD support for late rejection. There was a significant (P = .02) difference in survival after listing for transplantation among those supported with ECMO, with VAD, and those not supported with a device. No difference in posttransplant survival was demonstrated between those patients supported with either ECMO or VAD before transplant compared with all others not bridged to transplantation. Conclusions: Both VAD and ECMO support are highly effective means of bridging patients to transplantation and supporting patients after transplanatation. Ideally, the availability of smaller devices for children will have a favorable impact on the morbidity related to anticoagulation in the smallest patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Risk assessment prior to long-term ventricular assist device (VAD) placement has been shown to be crucial for successful outcomes and efficient resource utilization. Short-term VADs are often used as salvage therapy in acute heart failure when the clinical scenario precludes such thorough preoperative assessment. Our goal was to devise a risk stratification system that may be used shortly after stabilization of hemodynamics with a short-term VAD to predict the likelihood of survival. Methods: A retrospective study was performed of all patients undergoing Abiomed (Abiomed Cardiovascular Inc., Danvers, MA) or CentriMag (Levitronix LLC, Waltham, MA) placement at our institution or transferred to our institution with the device in place. From January 2001 until August 2009, 93 patients were identified. Preoperative and early postoperative variables were analyzed for their correlation with in-hospital mortality. Results: Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified factors that were associated with death. A three-point scoring system, utilizing a diagnosis of postcardiotomy shock or graft failure, female sex, and postoperative day 3 total bilirubin greater than 5.2 mg/dL was devised. A score of 2 or greater was associated with an 86% mortality rate, whereas a score of 0 was associated with a 13% mortality rate. Conclusions: A simple scoring system based on readily available data may predict mortality after short-term VAD placement. Such a scoring system may be of prognostic value for physicians and patient families early in the support period and may help guide decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article compares the impact of using continuous-flow (C) and pulsatile-flow (P) left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) for myocardial unloading and remodeling. The 61 post LVAD implantation patients observed showed the group who used the P device registered lower postoperative LV ejection fraction and mitral E/E' compared to those who used continuous-flow LVAD. The authors conclude that pulsatile mechanical unloading of the myocardium should be considered during device selection.

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare posttransplantation morbidity and mortality in orthotopic heart transplant recipients bridged to transplant with (1) continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD), (2) pulsatile-flow LVAD, or (3) inotropic therapy only with no LVAD. Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing provided deidentified patient-level data. All status 1 orthotopic heart transplant recipients (n = 7,744) 18 or more years of age and transplanted between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2008, were included. Follow-up was available through June 18, 2009. Recipients were stratified into three groups: inotropes (n = 5,448, 70.4%), continuous-flow LVAD (CONT [n = 564, 7.3%]), and pulsatile-flow LVAD (PULS [n = 1,732, 22.4%]). The primary outcome measure was risk-adjusted posttransplant graft survival (PTGS) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included risk-adjusted PTGS at 90 days to 1 year and 1 to 5 years. Results: Unadjusted PTGS was similar in all groups (p = 0.920). When compared with recipients bridged with inotropes, PTGS for patients bridged with an LVAD (CONT or PULS) did not differ in any follow-up period analyzed (<90 days, 90 days to 1 year, and 1 to 5 years). The PTGS in the CONT group (p = 0.021), but not in the PULS group (p = 0.244), improved significantly between the first half of the study period (2001 to 2004) and the second half (2005 to 2008). Conclusions: Compared with recipients bridged with inotropes, neither unadjusted nor adjusted PTGS differed for either the CONT group or the PULS group. Outcomes among the CONT group improved significantly from the first to the second half of the study period. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Use of ventricular assist devices (VADs) in patients with prosthetic valves may carry an increased risk of thromboembolism; however, clinical information is lacking. The aim of this study was to report our experience of the use of VADs in patients with prosthetic mitral valves. A retrospective analysis of 747 VAD patients from January 1995 to May 2010 was performed. Thirteen patients with a prosthetic mitral valve (average age 56 ± 10 years of age, nine mechanical valve, four biological valve) were identified. Indications for VAD implantation were as a bridge to transplant in 11 patients and destination therapy in two patients. At the time of VAD implant, no intervention to the prosthetic mitral valve was performed. Eight patients received a HeartMate I (Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, CA, USA), three patients received a HeartMate II (Thoratec Corporation), and two patients received a Thoratec VAD (Thoratec Corporation). Among nine mechanical valve patients, six patients were anticoagulated with warfarin, and one patient with heparin, while two patients did not receive anticoagulation due to bleeding. Ten patients were successfully transplanted at an average of 123 days post-VAD implant, one died after 48 days from multiorgan failure, and two remained on VAD support. No clinical thromboembolic events were observed. No intracardiac thrombus was detected by echocardiogram or on the pathology of the explanted hearts. Five patients had experienced a bleeding event (postoperative mediastinal bleeds, gastrointestinal bleedings, retroperitoneal hematoma, and subconjuctival bleeding). In patients with mitral valve prostheses who require VAD support, leaving the prosthesis intact does not increase the incidence of adverse events. (J Card Surg 2011;26:334-337) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Placement of a ventricular assist device (VAD) may lead to reduced or absent opening of the aortic valve and thus increase risk of thrombus formation in the aortic root as well as on the valve itself. The outcome of additional procedures to the aortic valve at the time of VAD placement is unclear. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 712 VAD patients from 1995 to 2009 was performed. Results: Twenty-eight patients were identified who underwent aortic valve procedures in addition to VAD placement. Indication for VAD placement was bridge to transplant in 23 patients, destination therapy in 4, and postcardiotomy shock in 1. Aortic valve procedures were performed for preexisting mechanical aortic prosthesis in 8 (7 closure and 1 aortic valve replacement with biological prosthesis), and for moderate or severe aortic insufficiency in 20 patients (10 repair, 9 closure, and 1 aortic valve replacement with biological prosthesis). At the last follow-up, 16 patients had undergone heart transplant, 6 remained on VAD support, and 5 had died. While on VAD support, no adverse events related to the aortic valve procedures occurred. The 30-day operative mortality was 0.4%. No clinical thromboembolic events were observed. In 2 patients, there was evidence of thrombus formation in the explanted heart. Four patients had bleeding complications. Of the 9 patients who received aortic valve repair, 2 had recurrent aortic insufficiency on echocardiograms during an average follow-up of 118 days. Conclusions: Additional procedures to the aortic valve at the time of VAD placement are feasible. Overall outcomes are comparable to those seen in patients without the need for aortic valve manipulation at the time of VAD placement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Palliative care consultation before left ventricular assist device (LVAD) surgery (PreVAD) has been recommended, but its impact on goal-concordant care is unknown.Objectives: To describe the association between patients' unique unacceptable condition articulated during PreVAD with the actual care provided at the end of life.Methods: Among 308 patients who had PreVAD between 2014 and 2019, 72 patients died before December 31, 2019. Based on the answers to the question, "Is there any condition you would find unacceptable?" patients were divided into ARTICULATE (those who could articulate their unacceptable condition clearly, n = 58) and non-ARTICULATE (those who could not, n = 14). Circumstances at death and end-of-life care were compared between groups.Results: Mean age at death was 63.2 years (SD ±13.1), 56 patients (77.8%) were males, and median duration of LVAD was 167.5 days (interquartile range 682). ARTICULATE patients died less frequently in the intensive care unit than non-ARTICULATE patients (33 patients, 57.9% vs. 13 patients, 92.9%; P = 0.014) and had ethics consultation less frequently (four patients, 6.9% vs. five patients, 35.7%; P = 0.011). Frequency of LVAD withdrawal was similar in both groups. Among ARTICULATE cohort, the unacceptable condition articulated in PreVAD did not seem to influence decisions at the end of life.Conclusion: Patients who articulated their unacceptable condition clearly before LVAD surgery had less frequent ethics consultations and received less intensive care at the end of life, but it did not seem to affect the decision of LVAD withdrawal. It may be more important to engage in discussions around their unacceptable conditions, rather than the specific condition articulated. The question of an unacceptable condition should be part of any routine palliative care consultation before LVAD surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ventricular septal defect (VSD) is a life-threatening complication of myocardial infarction (MI). Mortality is highest if VSD repair occurs within seven days following MI. We report a case of post-MI VSD stabilized with peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) followed by patch repair and implantation of a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reduced arterial pulsatility in continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVAD) patients has been implicated in clinical complications. Consequently, recent improvements in clinical outcomes have been attributed to the "artificial pulse" technology inherent to the HeartMate3 (HM3) LVAD. However, the effect of the "artificial pulse" on arterial flow, transmission of pulsatility into the microcirculation and its association with LVAD pump parameters is not known. The local flow oscillation (pulsatility index, PI) of common carotid arteries (CCAs), middle cerebral arteries (MCAs) and central retinal arteries (CRAs-representing the microcirculation) were quantified by 2D-aligned, angle-corrected Doppler ultrasound in 148 participants: healthy controls, n = 32; heart failure (HF), n = 43; HeartMate II (HMII), n = 32; HM3, n = 41. In HM3 patients, 2D-Doppler PI in beats with "artificial pulse" and beats with "continuous-flow" was similar to that of HMII patients across the macro- and microcirculation. Additionally, peak systolic velocity did not differ between HM3 and HMII patients. Transmission of PI into the microcirculation was higher in both HM3 (during the beats with "artificial pulse") and in HMII patients compared with HF patients. LVAD pump speed was inversely associated with microvascular PI in HMII and HM3 (HMII, r2 = 0.51, p < 0.0001; HM3 "continuous-flow," r2 = 0.32, p = 0.0009; HM3 "artificial pulse," r2 = 0.23, p = 0.007), while LVAD pump PI was only associated with microcirculatory PI in HMII patients. The "artificial pulse" of the HM3 is detectable in the macro- and microcirculation but without creating a significant alteration in PI compared with HMII patients. Increased transmission of pulsatility and the association between pump speed and PI in the microcirculation indicate that the future clinical care of HM3 patients may involve individualized pump settings according to the microcirculatory PI in specific end-organs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

HeartMate II (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, CA) continuous-flow ventricular assist devices may be exchanged through a subcostal approach, where the device body can be accessed easily and safely. The existing bend relief needs to be reattached to the new device body at the end of the operation, and this reattachment often results in a malalignment between the outflow graft, the bend relief, and the device body. This causes unexpected detachment and subsequent graft kinking. We present a new, simple technique to reinforce the bend relief connection. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices commonly lead to aortic regurgitation, which results in decreased pump efficiency and worsening heart failure. We hypothesized that non-physiological wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index alter the abundance of structural proteins in aortic valves of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients. Doppler images of aortic valves of patients undergoing heart transplants were obtained. Eight patients had been supported with LVADs, whereas 10 were not. Aortic valve tissue was collected and protein levels were analyzed using mass spectrometry. Echocardiographic images were analyzed and wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index were calculated. The relationship between normalized levels of individual proteins and in vivo echocardiographic measurements was evaluated. Of the 57 proteins of interest, there was a strong negative correlation between levels of 15 proteins and the wall shear stress (R < -0.500, p ≤ 0.05), and a moderate negative correlation between 16 proteins and wall shear stress (R −0.500 to −0.300, p ≤ 0.05). Gene ontology analysis demonstrated clusters of proteins involved in cellular structure. Proteins negatively correlated with WSS included those with cytoskeletal, actin/myosin, cell-cell junction and extracellular functions. In aortic valve tissue, 31 proteins were identified involved in cellular structure and extracellular junctions with a negative correlation between their levels and wall shear stress. These findings suggest an association between the forces acting on the aortic valve (AV) and leaflet protein abundance, and may form a mechanical basis for the increased risk of aortic leaflet degeneration in LVAD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The 2018 U.S. heart allocation system offers an accelerated pathway for heart transplantation to the most urgent patients.Objectives: This study sought to determine whether the new allocation system resulted in lower likelihood of candidate recovery.Methods: Adult patients waitlisted for heart transplantation with temporary mechanical circulatory support at the time of initial listing between 2010 and 2020 in the United Network for Organ Sharing registry were included. Competing events of heart transplantation, waitlist death or delisting for deteriorating condition, and delisting for improved condition (candidate recovery) were analyzed in the new vs old heart allocation system.Results: A total of 688 patients were waitlisted with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or a surgical nondischargeable biventricular assist device (status 1 or old 1A). Overall, 2,237 patients were waitlisted with an intra-aortic balloon pump, a percutaneous left ventricular assist device (LVAD), or a surgical nondischargeable LVAD (status 2 or old 1A). Patients waitlisted with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or a nondischargeable biventricular assist device had significantly shorter median waitlist times (5 vs 31 days), higher incidence for cardiac transplantation (81.5% vs 43.0%), and lower incidence of candidate recovery (1.5% vs 7.9%) in the new vs old heart allocation system (all P < 0.05). Patients waitlisted with an intra-aortic balloon pump or percutaneous or a nondischargeable LVAD also had significantly shorter median waitlist times (8 vs 35 days), higher incidence of transplantation (88.9% vs 64.9%), and lower incidence of candidate recovery (0.2% vs 1.6%) in the new vs old heart allocation system (all P < 0.05).Conclusions: Current practice of the new allocation system may not offer select temporary mechanical circulatory support patients the opportunity and adequate time to recover to the point of waitlist removal. Further research will determine which patients would benefit from urgent transplantation vs recovery strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly used as long-term therapy for end-stage heart failure patients. We compared the prevalence of aortic insufficiency (AI) after HeartMate II (HMII) vs HeartMate XVE (HMI) support and assessed the role of aortic root diameter and aortic valve opening in the development of AI. Method: Pre-operative and post-operative echocardiograms of 93 HMI and 73 HMII patients who received implants at our center between January 2004 and September 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. After excluding patients with prior or concurrent surgical manipulation of the aortic valve, with baseline AI, or without baseline echoes, 67 HMI and 63 HMII patients were studied. AI was deemed significant if mild to moderate or greater. Pathology reports were reviewed for 77 patients who underwent heart transplant. Results: AI developed in 4 of 67 HMI (6.0%) and in 9 of 63 HMII patients (14.3%). The median times to AI development were 48 days for HMI patients and 90 days for HMII patients. For patients who remained on device support at 6 and 12 months, freedom from AI was 94.5% and 88.9% in HMI patients and 83.6% and 75.2% in HMII patients (log rank p = 0.194). Aortic root diameters, as determined by echocardiography for the patients with AI, trended to be larger at baseline (3.43 ± 0.43 vs 3.15 ± 0.40; p = 0.067) and follow-up (3.58 ± 0.54 vs 3.29 ± 0.50; p = 0.130) compared with those who did not have AI. Aortic root circumferences were assessed directly by a pathologist in those patients who underwent transplant and were significantly larger in HMII patients who had developed AI compared with those patients who did not (8.44 ± 0.89 vs 7.36 ± 1.02 cm; p = 0.034). Lastly, AI was more common in patients whose aortic valve did not open (11 of 26 vs 1 of 14; p = 0.03). Conclusion: Aortic insufficiency occurs frequently in patients who receive continuous-flow support with a HMII LVAD, and may be associated with aortic root diameter enlargement and aortic valve opening. These findings warrant a more thorough preoperative patient evaluation and additional studies to investigate the factors, that may be associated with AI development. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

While rates of stroke have declined with the HeartMate3 (HM3) continuous- flow (CF) left ventricular assist device (LVAD), the impact of non-pulsatile flow and artificial pulse physiology on cerebrovascular function is not known. We hypothesized that improved hemodynamics and artificial pulse physiology of HM3 patients would augment cerebrovascular metabolic reactivity (CVR) compared with HeartMate II (HMII) CF-LVAD and heart failure (HF) patients. Mean, peak systolic and diastolic flow velocities (MFV, PSV, MinFV, respectively) and cerebral pulsatility index were determined in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) before and after a 30 sec breath-hold challenge in 90 participants: 24 healthy controls; 30 HF, 15 HMII, and 21 HM3 patients. In HM3 patients, breath-holding increased MFV (Δ8 ± 10 cm/sec, p <.0001 vs baseline) to levels similar to HF patients (Δ9 ± 8 cm/sec, p >.05), higher than HMII patients (Δ2 ± 8 cm/sec, p <.01) but lower than healthy controls (Δ13 ± 7 cm/sec, p <.05). CF-LVAD altered the proportion of systolic and diastolic flow responses as reflected by a differential cerebral pulsatility index (p =.03). Baseline MFV was not related to CVR (r2 = 0.0008, p =.81). However, CF-LVAD pump speed was strongly inversely associated with CVR in HM II (r2 = 0.51, p =.003) but not HM3 patients (r2 = 0.01, p =.65). Compared with HMII, HM3 patients have a significantly improved CVR. However, CVR remains lower in HM3 and HF patients than in healthy controls, therefore suggesting that changes in cerebral hemodynamics are not reversed by CF-LVAD therapy. Further research on the mechanisms and the long-term impact of altered cerebral hemodynamics in this unique patient population are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Functional mitral regurgitation (MR) (FMR) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are common in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. However, the impact of FMR and AF on clinical outcomes is uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and prognostic significance of FMR and AF in patients with LVADs. We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent LVAD implantation at our center between January 2010 and December 2017. We defined significant FMR as the ratio of MR color jet area to left atrial area of >20% and persistent or permanent AF (PeAF) as persistent or permanent AF at LVAD implantation. A total of 380 patients were included in this analysis. Patients were divided into 6 groups: patients with no PeAF and no significant FMR (Group 1), patients with no PeAF but with significant FMR (Group 2), patients with PeAF but no significant FMR (Group 3), patients with PeAF and significant FMR (Group 4), patients with concomitant mitral valve surgery (MVS) at LVAD implantation and without PeAF (Group 5), and patients with concomitant MVS and with PeAF (Group 6). A total of 56 patients (15%) died within 2 years. Kaplan–Meier curve analysis demonstrated a 2-year survival of 81% in Group 1, 89% in Group 2, 87% in Group 3, 47% in Group 4, 87% in Group 5, and 79 % in Group 6 (log-rank test, p < 0.001). The multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model showed that classification in Group 4 was an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio, 4.31; 95% CI: 2.19–8.46; p < 0.001). The coexistence of significant FMR and PeAF may represent a poor prognostic marker in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gut microbial imbalance may contribute to endotoxemia, inflammation, and oxidative stress in heart failure (HF). Changes occurring in the intestinal microbiota and inflammatory/oxidative milieu during HF progression and following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or heart transplantation (HT) are unknown. We aimed to investigate variation in gut microbiota and circulating biomarkers of endotoxemia, inflammation, and oxidative stress in patients with HF (New York Heart Association, Class I–IV), LVAD, and HT. We enrolled 452 patients. Biomarkers of endotoxemia (lipopolysaccharide and soluble [sCD14]), inflammation (C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and endothelin-1 adiponectin), and oxidative stress (isoprostane) were measured in 644 blood samples. A total of 304 stool samples were analyzed using 16S rRNA sequencing. Gut microbial community measures of alpha diversity were progressively lower across worsening HF class and were similarly reduced in patients with LVAD and HT (p < 0.05). Inflammation and oxidative stress were elevated in patients with Class IV HF vs all other groups (all p < 0.05). Lipopolysaccharide was elevated in patients with Class IV HF (vs Class I–III) as well as in patients with LVAD and HT (p < 0.05). sCD14 was elevated in patients with Class IV HF and LVAD (vs Class I–III, p < 0.05) but not in patients with HT. Reduced gut microbial diversity and increased endotoxemia, inflammation, and oxidative stress are present in patients with Class IV HF. Inflammation and oxidative stress are lower among patients with LVAD and HT relative to patients with Class IV HF, whereas reduced gut diversity and endotoxemia persist in LVAD and HT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In heart transplantation (HT), although blood type O organs can go to any blood type, non-O organs may not be allocated to adult O recipients. Therefore, O candidates wait longer than non-O candidates and frequently require bridging with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). The effects of this discrepancy are rarely investigated in a large registry. The purpose of this study was to assess the association between candidates' blood type and their outcomes after HT listing. This is a retrospective cohort study using the United Network for Organ Sharing Registry, including 34,352 candidates listed for a single-organ, primary HT from January 2000 through December 2015. Main outcome measures were waitlist mortality and post-HT mortality, using blood type A as reference. We conducted inverse-probability weighting to adjust for baseline profiles. Among 34,352 candidates (median age 55, interquartile range 46–62; female 24.8%; blood type A: 13,258, AB: 1,572, B: 4,599, O:14,923), 22,714 candidates (A: 71.5%, AB: 82.1%, B: 73.0%, O: 57.5%; p < 0.001) underwent HT during the study period. Among recipients, bridging LVAD rate was highest in O recipients (A: 23.0%, AB: 15.3%, B: 23.4%, O: 32.1%; p < 0.001). After inverse-probability weighting, O patients demonstrated a significantly higher hazard of death after listing (adjusted hazard ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07–1.16) and after HT (adjusted hazard ratio 1.07, 95% CI 1.01–1.13) as compared with A. There is a survival discrepancy among blood types. Our findings should facilitate more prospective studies to revisit current policies regarding equity in allocation, where possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) in predicting outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and explore possible mechanisms of post-operative hemodynamic instability. Retrospective review was performed in 418 consecutive patients with LVAD implantation. VIS was calculated as dopamine + dobutamine + 10 × milrinone + 100 × epinephrine + 100 × norepinephrine (all μg/kg/min) + 10000 × vasopressin (U/kg/min) after initial stabilization in the operating room and upon arrival at the intensive care unit. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were a composite of in-hospital mortality, delayed right ventricular assist device (RVAD) implantation, and continuous renal replacement therapy. The pre-operative biomarkers of inflammation, oxidative stress, endotoxemia and gut-derived metabolite trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) were measured in a subset of 61 patients. Median VIS was 20.0 (interquartile range 13.3–27.9). VIS was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–1.09, p < 0.001) and composite outcome (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.06, p = 0.008). In-hospital mortality increased for each VIS quartile (0% vs 3.9% vs 7.6% vs 12.3%, p = 0.002). VIS was superior to other established LVAD risk models as a predictor of in-hospital mortality (area under the curve 0.73, 95% CI 0.64–0.82). The optimal cut-off point for VIS as a predictor of in-hospital mortality was 20. Pre-operative hemoglobin level was the only independent predictor of VIS ≥ 20 (p = 0.003). Patients with a high VIS were more likely to have elevated TMAO pre-operatively (53.6% vs 25.8%, p = 0.03). A high post-operative VIS is associated with adverse in-hospital outcomes and is a better predictor of in-hospital mortality compared with existing LVAD risk models. Whether early hemodynamic stabilization using RVAD may benefit patients with a high VIS remains to be investigated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Bridge to transplantation (BTT) with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is a mainstay of therapy for heart failure in patients awaiting heart transplantation (HT). Criteria for HT listing do not differ between patients medically managed and those mechanically bridged to HT. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the impact of BTT with LVAD on posttransplantation survival, to describe differences in causes of 1-year mortality in medically and mechanically bridged patients, and to evaluate differences in risk factors for 1-year mortality between those with and those without LVAD at the time of HT.Methods: Using the United Network of Organ Sharing database, we identified 5486 adult, single-organ HT recipients transplanted between 2008 and 2015. Patients were propensity matched for likelihood of LVAD at the time of HT. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to assess the impact of BTT on 1- and 5-year mortality. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the odds ratio of 1-year mortality for patients BTT with LVAD compared with those with medical management across clinically significant variables at various thresholds.Results: Early mortality was higher in mechanically bridged patients: 9.5% versus 7.2% mortality at 1 year (P<0.001). BTT patients incurred an increased risk of 1-year mortality with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 40 to 60 mL·min-1·1.73 m-2 (odds ratio, 1.69; P=0.003) and <40 mL·min-1·1.73 m-2 (odds ratio, 2.16; P=0.005). A similar trend was seen in patients with a body mass index of 25 to 30 kg/m2 (odds ratio, 1.88; P=0.024) and >30 kg/m2 (odds ratio, 2.11; P<0.001). When patients were stratified by BTT status and the presence of risk factors, including age >60 years, estimated glomerular filtration rate <40 mL·min-1·1.73 m-2, and body mass index >30 kg/m2, there were significant differences in 1-year mortality between medium- and high-risk medically and mechanically bridged patients, with 1-year mortality in high-risk BTT patients at 17.6% compared with 10.4% in high-risk medically managed patients.Conclusions: Bridge to HT with LVAD, although necessary because of organ scarcity and capable of improving wait list survival, confers a significantly higher risk of early posttransplantation mortality. Patients bridged with mechanical support may require more careful consideration for transplant eligibility after LVAD placement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND Elevated blood pressure (BP) has been linked to adverse events during left ventricular assist device support. In this study we investigated the association between outpatient BP and stroke or suspected pump thrombosis among HeartMate II (HMII) recipients. METHODS We retrospectively studied 220 HMII patients. Serial outpatient BP measurements were averaged. Patients were categorized by: (1) mean arterial pressure (MAP), high (>90 mm Hg) vs intermediate (80 mm Hg ≤ MAP ≤ 90 mm Hg) vs low (<80 mm Hg); (2) systolic BP (SBP), high (≥101 mm Hg, median) vs low; and (3) pulse pressure (PP), high (≥22 mm Hg, median) vs low. To assess visit-to-visit BP variability, patients were divided in quartiles of standard deviation of MAP and SBP. The primary end-point was the composite of stroke or suspected pump thrombosis. RESULTS Unlabelled box See Related Editorial, page XXX The risk for the primary end-point was increased in the high MAP group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49 to 5.05, vs intermediate MAP; and 6.73, 1.9 to 23.9, vs low MAP). MAP had higher predictive value for the primary end-point compared with SBP (p = 0.05). Patients with high SBP had a higher rate of stroke (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.09 to 7.17, vs low SBP). The combination of high SBP and low PP was associated with the highest risk for stroke. The lowest quartile of visit-to-visit MAP variability was associated with the highest risk for the primary end-point. CONCLUSIONS Elevated outpatient BP is associated with increased risk for stroke or suspected pump thrombosis in HMII recipients. Reduced PP and low visit-to-visit BP variability may confer additional risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND Aortic root thrombosis (ART) is a recently recognized complication of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) therapy. However, little is known about the prevalence or clinical significance of this complication. The aim of our study was to systematically evaluate the incidence and significance of ART on CF-LVAD support. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent HeartMate II or HeartWare HVAD CF-LVAD implantation from April 2004 through June 2016 at the Columbia University Medical Center. Echocardiography studies were systematically reviewed to identify patients who developed ART. Study outcomes included post-ART survival on CF-LVAD support, stroke, pump thrombosis, and clinically significant myocardial infarction (MI). RESULTS The study cohort consisted of 436 CF-LVAD patients with 21 patients (4.8%) diagnosed with confirmed ART at a median time of 22 days (interquartile range [IQR] 3 to 56 days) after CF-LVAD implantation. Involvement of the non-coronary cusp was the most common location of the ART (n = 15, 71.4%) and concomitant RV failure occurred in 14 patients (66.7%). Actuarial survival at 1 and 2 years after diagnosis of ART was 73.8% and 44.3%, respectively. ART was associated with a high rate of complications, including stroke (28.6%, 0.337 episode per patient-year [EPPY]) and clinically significant MI (28.6%, 0.337 EPPY). CONCLUSIONS ART is not uncommon after CF-LVAD implantation and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in CF-LVAD patients. Given the early occurrence and high incidence of stroke and MI in patients who develop ART, surveillance and treatment strategies should be implemented to address this potentially devastating complication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a frequent cause of re-admission in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) and is associated with multiple endoscopic procedures and high resource utilization. Our aim was to determine the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of endoscopy and to develop a more cost-effective approach for the management of GIB in CF-LVAD recipients. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 428 patients implanted with a CF-LVAD between 2009 and 2016 at the Columbia University Medical Center and identified those hospitalized for GIB. Patients were categorized into upper GIB (UGIB), lower GIB (LGIB) and occult GIB (OGIB), based on clinical presentation. Results Eighty-seven CF-LVAD patients underwent a total of 164 GIBs, resulting in 239 endoscopies. Index presentation was consistent with UGIB in 30 (34.5%), LGIB in 19 (21.8%) and OGIB in 38 (43.7%) patients. On the first GIB, 147 endoscopies localized a bleeding source in 49 (30%), resulting in 24 (16.3%) endoscopic interventions. Of 45 lesions identified, arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) were the most common (22, 48.9%). A gastric or small bowel source (HR 2.8, p = 0.003) and an endoscopic intervention (HR 1.9, p = 0.04) predicted recurrent GIB. The proposed algorithm may reduce the number of endoscopic procedures by 45% and costs by 35%. Conclusions Occult GIB is the most common presentation in CF-LVAD patients and carries the lowest diagnostic and therapeutic yield of endoscopy. Performing an intervention was among the strongest predictors of recurrent GIB. Our proposed algorithm may decrease the number of low-yield procedures and improve resource utilization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is one of the most common causes of early death after orthotopic heart transplantation. Mechanical circulatory support devices are required for severe forms of PGD. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and temporary ventricular assist device (VAD) support have both been reported to be useful for severe PGD. Methods Between January 2007 and December 2015, 597 patients received a heart transplant at our center. Of those, severe PGD developed in 44 patients (7.4%), and they received a continuous-flow external VAD ( n = 17) or VA-ECMO ( n = 27) support within 24 hours after transplant. We compared early and late outcomes between groups. Results Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Implantation of the temporary VAD required longer cardiopulmonary bypass time compared with VA-ECMO (323 ± 86 minutes vs 216 ± 65 minutes, p < 0.0001). Patients who received a VAD were more likely to have longer support time (14 ± 17 days vs 5.2 ± 3.9 days, p = 0.011), a higher incidence of major bleeding requiring chest reexploration (77% vs 30%, p = 0.0047), and a higher incidence of renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy (53% vs 11%, p = 0.0045) after surgery. Overall hospital mortality was 27%. In-hospital mortality for VAD and VA-ECMO patients were 41% and 19%, respectively ( p = 0.16). Ten patients (59%) were weaned from VAD support, and 24 (89%) were weaned from VA-ECMO support after adequate graft function recovery ( p = 0.03). The 3-year post-transplant survival was 41% in the VAD group and 66% in the VA-ECMO group ( p = 0.13). Conclusions For severe PGD, support with VA-ECMO appears to result in better clinical outcomes compared with VAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) provide a significant mortality benefit for appropriately selected patients with advanced heart failure. ICDs are associated with a mortality benefit when used in patients with a pulsatile left ventricular assist device (LVAD). It is unclear whether patients with a continuous-flow LVAD (CF-LVAD) derive the same benefit. We sought to determine if the presence of an ICD provided a mortality benefit during CF-LVAD support as a bridge to transplantation. Methods Patients were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry who underwent LVAD implantation as bridge to transplantation between May 2004 and April 2014, with follow-up through June 2014. Primary outcome was freedom from death while on CF-LVAD support with adjustment for complications requiring UNOS listing status upgrade. Secondary end-points included freedom from delisting while on CF-LVAD support and incidence of transplantation. Results The study cohort comprised 2,990 patients, and propensity score matching identified 1,012 patients with similar propensity scores. There was no difference in survival during device support between patients with and without an ICD (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66–2.17; p = 0.55). Adjusting for device complications requiring a UNOS listing status upgrade had minimal influence (HR = 1.11; 95% CI, 0.60–2.05; p = 0.74). There was no increased risk of delisting owing to being too sick for patients with an ICD (HR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.63–1.86; p = 0.78). Likewise, the probability of transplantation was similar (HR = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.87–1.27; p = 0.62). Conclusions Among patients bridged to transplantation with a CF-LVAD, the presence of an ICD did not reduce mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is the standard measure for detection of hemolysis and thus surveillance for device thrombosis in patients on continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) support. Significant hemolysis has been defined as LDH ≥600 IU/L. However, LDH testing requires phlebotomy, precluding frequent home monitoring. Simple dipstick urinalysis (UA) for urine hemoglobin (U-Hb) overcomes this limitation. This study correlated U-Hb and LDH levels and evaluated the performance of UA for detection of significant hemolysis in patients with CF-LVADs. Methods U-Hb and LDH were measured concurrently 956 times in 221 patients with CF-LVADs. Statistics were computed to determine accuracy of UA in detecting LDH ≥600 IU/L, with a positive result being any detected U-Hb. All analyses were performed with and without excluding for 1) conditions associated with tissue damage, which are known to increase LDH, and 2) suspected or confirmed urinary tract infections or hematuria, which are known to cause hemoglobinuria for reasons other than hemolysis. Results Mean LDH for absent/mild/severe U-Hb was 360 IU/L/467 IU/L IU/L/777 IU/L without exclusions, 354 IU/L/444 IU/L IU/L/651 IU/L after excluding non-hemolytic LDH elevations, 370 IU/L/513 IU/L IU/L/1,357 IU/L after excluding urinary tract infections and hematuria, and 367 IU/L/470 IU/L IU/L/1,217 IU/L when both exclusions applied (all p < 0.001). Absent U-Hb had a negative predictive value for LDH ≥600 IU/L of >90% for all analyses. Conclusions Serum LDH is significantly associated with U-Hb levels. Absence of U-Hb appears to efficiently exclude significant hemolysis in patients with CF-LVADs. Because it can be performed by patients at home, hemoglobinuria monitoring may enable more intense surveillance and earlier diagnosis of device thrombosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Left ventricular assist devices are increasingly being used in patients with advanced heart failure as both destination therapy and bridge to transplant. We aimed to identify histomorphometric, structural and inflammatory changes after pulsatile- and continuous-flow left ventricular assist device placement. Methods Clinical and echocardiographic data were collected from medical records. Aortic wall diameter, cellularity and inflammation were assessed by immunohistochemistry on aortic tissue collected at left ventricular assist device placement and at explantation during heart transplantation. Expression of adhesion molecules was quantified by Western blot. Results Decellularization of the aortic tunica media was observed in patients receiving continuous-flow support. Both device types showed an increased inflammatory response after left ventricular assist device placement with variable T-cell and macrophage accumulations and increased expression of vascular E-selectin, ICAM and VCAM in the aortic wall. Conclusions Left ventricular assist device implantation is associated with distinct vascular derangements with development of vascular inflammation. These changes are pronounced in patients on continuous-flow left ventricular assist and associated with aortic media decellularization. The present findings help to explain the progressive aortic root dilation and vascular dysfunction in patients after continuous-flow device placement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Stroke is one of the leading complications during continuous flow-left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) support. Risk factors have been well described, although less is known regarding treatment and outcomes. We present a large single-center experience on stroke outcome and transplant eligibility by stroke sub-type and severity in CF-LVAD patients. Methods Between January 1, 2008, and April 1, 2015, 301 patients underwent CF-LVAD (266 HeartMate II [HM I], Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, CA; 35 HeartWare [HVAD], HeartWare International Inc, Framingham, MA). Stroke was defined as a focal neurologic deficit with abnormal neuroimaging. Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) definition excluded sub-dural hematoma and hemorrhagic conversion of an ischemic stroke (IS). Treatment in IS included intra-arterial embolectomy when appropriate; treatment in ICH included reversal of coagulopathy. Stroke severity was measured using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Outcomes were in-hospital mortality and transplant status. Results Stroke occurred in 40 patients: 8 ICH (4 HM II, 4 HVAD) and 32 IS (26 HM II, 6 HVAD). Among 8 ICH patients, there were 4 deaths (50%), with NIHSS of 18.8 ± 13.7 vs 1.8 ± 1.7 in survivors ( p = 0.049). Among 32 IS patients, 12 had hemorrhagic conversion and 5 were treated with intra-arterial embolectomy. There were 9 deaths (28%), with NIHSS of 16.2 ± 10.8 vs 7.0 ± 7.6 in survivors ( p = 0.011). Among the 32 IS patients, 12 underwent transplant, and 1 is awaiting transplant. No ICH patients received a transplant. Conclusions In-hospital mortality after stroke is significantly affected by the initial neurologic impairment. Patients with IS appear to benefit the most from in-hospital treatment and often make sufficient recovery to be able to progress to transplant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background This study evaluated current trends in incidence and outcomes of left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-related thromboembolic (LVAD-TE) and LVAD malfunction (LVAD-M) complications among heart transplant (HT) candidates supported with continuous-flow LVADs. LVAD-TE and LVAD-M are potentially catastrophic complications that may require status upgrade on the HT waiting list. An increased incidence of device thrombosis has been recently observed; however, whether similar trends of LVAD-TE and LVAD-M are observed on the HT waiting list and their effect on outcomes is unknown. Methods We analyzed 3,821 HT candidates on continuous-flow LVADs who were registered on the United States waiting list from 2008 to 2014. We evaluated the incidence of LVAD-TE and LVAD-M as well as survival before and after HT. Results LVAD-TE occurred in 249 patients (6.5%) and LVAD-M in 210 patients (5.5%). The incidence of LVAD-TE was highest in regions 1, 2, and 9, whereas LVAD-M was highest in regions 9, 1, and 7. The incidence of LVAD-TE and LVAD-M increased after 2011 from 0.04 to 0.10 and from 0.03 to 0.08 events per patient-year ( p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Survival on the waiting list at 2 years was lower in candidates with LVAD-TE (45% vs 72%, p < 0.0001) and LVAD-M (56% vs 71%, p = 0.003) compared with candidates without complications. Post-HT survival was similar between patients with and without LVAD-TE and LVAD-M ( p > 0.43 for both outcomes). In patients with LVAD-TE, mortality risk was highest among candidates managed conservatively (hazard ratio, 8.07; p < 0.0001), whereas patients who underwent HT only (hazard ratio, 0.10; p < 0.0001) had the lowest mortality risk and similar to that of patients without LVAD-TE ( p = 0.34). Conclusions The incidence of LVAD-TE and LVAD-M on the United States waiting list has increased since 2011, with significant regional variation. LVAD-TE and LVAD-M have a detrimental effect on waiting list survival and transplant candidacy. In candidates who develop an LVAD-TE, a conservative approach, without LVAD exchange or HT, carries the highest risk of death. These results should be considered in the ongoing efforts to optimize the allocation of donor hearts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Drive-line infection (DLI) is a common complication of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support, leading to significant morbidity that jeopardizes the benefits of these devices. It has been reported that DLI incidence is related to drive-line dressing strategies. The aim of this study was to determine whether implementation of a standardized drive-line care kit would reduce the incidence of DLIs. Methods DLI data were collected prospectively on all LVAD patients implanted between 2009 and 2013 at Columbia University Medical Center. Drive-line care was altered on June 1, 2011, from a dry sterile dressing without a standard anchoring device to a standardized kit, which included silver gauze dressing and a standard anchoring device. The silver dressing was used until the wound incorporated, with a minimum of 1 month. Results During the study period, 107 patients were implanted with LVADs before implementation of a standardized kit (Group A) and 159 thereafter (Group B). Median follow-up time (censoring at June 2011) for Group A was 8.73 (IQR 3.51 to 17.47) months and 11.65 (IQR 6.66 to 35.20) months for Group B ( p = 0.17). DLI event rate improved from 0.18 to 0.07 event per patient-year, corresponding to a relative risk reduction of 62.5%. In addition, the 1-year freedom from infection was significantly increased in Group B (92.46%) compared with Group A (81.94%) (log rank = 0.036). Conclusion The use of a standardized kit, including silver dressing and a standard anchoring device, leads to decrease in DLI with an absolute risk reduction of 11%. Routine use of these dressing techniques is warranted based on our findings, and may lead to reduction of complications related to infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are common in patients with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD). The causes and clinical significance of early post-operative VAs have not previously been characterized in these patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence, precipitants, and clinical impact of early VAs in patients supported by CF-LVADs. Methods Patients with a long-term CF-LVAD receiving care between January 1, 2012, and March 1, 2014, were enrolled and followed prospectively. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) were interrogated at baseline and throughout the follow-up period. VA was defined as ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation lasting >30 seconds or effectively terminated by appropriate ICD tachytherapy or external defibrillation. The primary end-point was the occurrence of early VAs (within 30 days of surgery). Secondary end-points were right ventricular (RV) failure and need for VA ablation. Results There were 162 patients enrolled, and 38 (23.5%) experienced at least 1 early VA. Predictors of early VA were a history of pre-operative VAs, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, and older age. Several conditions frequently encountered in the early post-operative period were identified as possible precipitants for VA episodes. Early VAs were associated with post-operative RV failure, particularly when patients received shocks instead of anti-tachycardia pacing. Conclusions Early VAs are common and are associated with RV failure. ICD shocks, but not anti-tachycardia pacing, for early VAs are associated with acute worsening of RV failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) are increasingly used to support patients with advanced heart failure (HF). Device thrombosis is a serious complication of CF-LVADs, but its precise prevalence and etiology remains uncertain. Methods: Root-cause analysis was performed in all cases with device thrombosis confirmed upon explant among patients implanted with a HeartMate II (HM II) from January 1, 2009 to November 15, 2012. Cannula position and bend relief integrity were assessed and charts were reviewed with particular attention to anti-coagulation and infection profiles. Results: Nineteen of 177 patients (11%) were found to have device thrombosis of various etiologies after a mean of 351 ± 311 days, representing 0.12 event/patient-year. Of the 5 mechanically induced thromboses, proximate etiology was severely abnormal inflow cannula position in 3 patients and bend relief disconnect with deformed outflow graft in 2 patients. One patient had a hypercoagulable disorder with prior arterial embolism. In the remaining 13 patients (age 61 ± 14 years, 77% male, 69% Caucasian), “non-mechanical” device thrombosis occurred after 357 ± 383 days; INR at the time of diagnosis was 1.81 (1.62 to 2.07); and mean device speed was 8,855 ± 359 rpm. Five of 13 patients (38%) had an infection during the month leading up to device thrombosis. Of note, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was already elevated at the time of discharge in patients who would later develop non-mechanical device thrombosis (423 [354 to 766] vs 352 [272 to 373] U/liter, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Device thrombosis is a multifactorial phenomenon, and differentiation of mechanical and non-mechanical causes is an essential step for individual diagnosis and treatment plans. Larger studies excluding patients with obvious mechanical etiology are needed to investigate biologic and/or management-related risk factors for device thrombosis. Our findings suggest that LDH may be an early risk marker. Due to the difficulty in treating late-stage device thrombosis, we suggest early use of simple tests to rule out both causes of thrombosis, such as X-rays and closer LDH monitoring (bi-weekly). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A percentage of patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) require device exchange. Although this is an important clinical entity, there are only a handful of relevant studies on this topic in the literature. Methods: From 2004 to 2012, 30 device exchanges (HeartMate II to HeartMate II) were performed. Since June 2011, we have employed the subcostal approach for device exchange if indicated. Sixteen patients underwent device exchange through a subcostal approach (S group), whereas 14 patients had devices exchanged through a full sternotomy (F group). Pre- and post-operative data were retrospectively reviewed. Results: There was no difference in baseline patient characteristics between the two groups. Overall, mean duration between primary surgery and device exchange was 425 ± 407 days. Surgical indications included device thrombus/hemolysis (N = 19), device malfunction (N = 9) and infection (N = 2). Cardiopulmonary bypass time was significantly shorter in the S group (S: 40 ± 23 minutes, F: 105 ± 84 minutes; p < 0.05), and post-operative bleeding within 24 hours after surgery was less in the S group (S: 362 ± 367 ml, F: 1,286 ± 971 ml; p < 0.05). Length of ICU stay was significantly shorter in the S group (S: 4.6 ± 1.8 days, F: 8.2 ± 4.9 days; p < 0.05). There was no difference in post-operative complications, except for prolonged intubation (F: N = 6 [43%], S: N = 1 [6.3%]; p < 0.05). There were 3 deaths in the F group and 0 in the S group, with no statistical difference (p = 0.09). Also, there was no significant difference in other outcomes, including transplantation, device explantation and ongoing LVAD support. Conclusions: A subcostal approach may be preferred for HeartMate II device exchange if indicated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hypoalbuminemia has been recognized as a prognostic indicator in patients with heart failure. We aimed to investigate the association of hypoalbuminemia with postoperative mortality in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We studied 272 consecutive patients undergoing LVAD implantation from 2000 to 2010 at our institution. Preoperative clinical characteristics and laboratory variables associated with mortality were analyzed. Postoperative survival of patients with preoperative hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dl, n = 125) and those with normal albumin concentration (≥3.5 g/dl, n = 147) was compared. Survival after LVAD surgery was better in patients with normal albumin levels compared with those with hypoalbuminemia before surgery (3 and 12 months: 93.2% vs 82.4% and 88.4% vs 75.2%, respectively, p <0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative albumin was independently associated with mortality after LVAD implantation (hazard ratio 0.521, 95% confidence interval 0.290 to 0.934; p = 0.029.) Furthermore, the impact of normalization of albumin levels during LVAD support on postoperative survival was analyzed in both groups. Subgroup analysis of patients with preoperative hypoalbuminemia and postoperative normalization of albumin levels (n = 81) showed improved survival compared with those who remained hypoalbuminemia (n = 44) or those who had decreasing albumin levels during LVAD support (n = 40; 3-month survival: 92.6% vs 63.6% and 65.0%; p <0.01). In conclusion, preoperative hypoalbuminemia is associated with poor prognosis after LVAD surgery. Postoperative normalization of albumin level is associated with improved survival. Attention to albumin levels by correcting nutrition, inflammation, and hepatic function could be an effective way to improve prognosis in patients evaluated for LVAD implantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: On April 4, 2012, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a Class 1R recall of the HeartMate II (Thoratec Corporation, Pleasanton, CA) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) due to spontaneous detachment of the bend relief from its intended position in patients implanted with the most recent version of the HM II. This study examined the incidence and timing of outflow graft bend relief disconnection in patients implanted with the HM II LVAD. Methods: All patients supported with the modified version of the HM II LVAD were asked to report for dedicated abdominal X-ray imaging to assess the position of the bend relief. Also performed was a retrospective review of X-ray images of all patients who had previously been supported with this version but had since received a transplant, undergone LVAD explant, or died. Results: Between March 9, 2011, and April 9, 2012, 59 patients underwent primary implant with the modified version HM II. Follow up X-ray images were available for 56 patients (95%). The bend relief was found fully disconnected in 6 of 56 (11%) and partially disconnected in 13 (23%). Two of 6 patients (33%) with full bend relief disconnection and 1 of 13 of the initially partially disconnected patients (7.7%) required urgent surgical intervention due to symptoms of hemolysis and/or heart failure. Conclusions: Bend relief disconnection is common and may be observed immediately after implant but may also develop over time. Full bend relief disconnect may present with hemolysis and/or heart failure symptoms and often requires surgical revision. Surveillance abdominal X-ray imaging should be performed routinely on all patients who were implanted with the modified version HM II. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background--Heart failure is associated with impaired myocardial metabolism with a shift from fatty acids to glucose use for ATP generation. We hypothesized that cardiac accumulation of toxic lipid intermediates inhibits insulin signaling in advanced heart failure and that mechanical unloading of the failing myocardium corrects impaired cardiac metabolism. Methods and Results--We analyzed the myocardium and serum of 61 patients with heart failure (body mass index, 26.5±5.1 kg/m2; age, 51±12 years) obtained during left ventricular assist device implantation and at explantation (mean duration, 185 ±156 days) and from 9 control subjects. Systemic insulin resistance in heart failure was accompanied by decreased myocardial triglyceride and overall fatty acid content but increased toxic lipid intermediates, diacylglycerol, and ceramide. Increased membrane localization of protein kinase C isoforms, inhibitors of insulin signaling, and decreased activity of insulin signaling molecules Akt and Foxo were detectable in heart failure compared with control subjects. Left ventricular assist device implantation improved whole-body insulin resistance (homeostatic model of analysis-insulin resistance, 4.5±0.6-3.2±0.5; P<0.05) and decreased myocardial levels of diacylglycerol and ceramide, whereas triglyceride and fatty acid content remained unchanged. Improved activation of the insulin/phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/Akt signaling cascade after left ventricular assist device implantation was confirmed by increased phosphorylation of Akt and Foxo, which was accompanied by decreased membrane localization of protein kinase C isoforms after left ventricular assist device implantation. Conclusions--Mechanical unloading after left ventricular assist device implantation corrects systemic and local metabolic derangements in advanced heart failure, leading to reduced myocardial levels of toxic lipid intermediates and improved cardiac insulin signaling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients in cardiogenic shock require immediate circulatory support. Outcomes of patients who underwent short-term ventricular assist device (STVAD) implantation in a community hospital (CH) as a bridge to a long-term VAD (LTVAD) were compared with those who received both implants at the same tertiary hospital (TH). Methods: Data were retrospectively reviewed for patients with a STVAD who were bridged to a LTVAD in a TH from 1997 to 2010. We studied outcomes and survival censored for cardiac transplantation. Results: Thirty-seven patients (73% male) were identified. Mean age was 52 ± 16 years, 30% were diabetic, and 65% had intra-aortic balloon pump support. Reasons for STVAD implantation were an acute myocardial infarction, 38%; post-cardiotomy, 38%, decompensated chronic heart failure, 19%; and others, 5%. A STVAD was implanted in a CH in 20 patients (54%), and they had fewer cardiovascular risk factors than those whose STVAD was implanted at the TH. All patients at the CH were at Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support 1 compared with 71% at the TH (p = 0.014). Patients from the CH tended to die sooner after LTVAD implant, although long-term survival was similar. At the 1-year follow-up, 65% from the CH were alive or had received a transplant vs 60% from the TH. Conclusion: Patients with cardiogenic shock in whom a STVAD was implanted in a CH and then were bridged to a LTVAD in a TH had similar long-term survival as those bridged to LTVAD at the TH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Liver dysfunction increases post-surgical morbidity and mortality. The Model of End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) estimates liver function but can be inaccurate in patients receiving oral anti-coagulation. We evaluated the effect of liver dysfunction on outcomes after ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation and the dynamic changes in liver dysfunction that occur during VAD support. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 255 patients (147 with pulsatile devices and 108 with continuous-flow devices) who received a long-term VAD between 2000 and 2010. Liver dysfunction was estimated by MELD and MELD-eXcluding INR (MELD-XI), with patients grouped by a score of ≥ 17 or < 17. Primary outcomes were on-VAD, after transplant, and overall survival. Results: MELD and MELD-XI correlated highly (R ≥ 0.901, p < 0.0001) in patients not on oral anti-coagulation. Patients with MELD or MELD-XI < 17 had improved on-VAD and overall survival (p < 0.05) with a higher predictive power for MELD-XI. During VAD support, cholestasis initially worsened but eventually improved. Patients with pre-VAD liver dysfunction who survived to transplant had lower post-transplant survival (p = 0.0193). However, if MELD-XI normalized during VAD support, post-transplant survival improved and was similar to that of patients with low MELD-XI scores. Conclusions: MELD-XI is a viable alternative for assessing liver dysfunction in heart failure patients on oral anti-coagulation. Liver dysfunction is associated with worse survival. However, if MELD-XI improves during VAD support, post-transplant survival is similar to those without prior liver dysfunction, suggesting an important prognostic role. We also found evidence of a transient cholestatic state after LVAD implantation that deserves further examination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]