Search

Background: Elder mistreatment is common and has serious social and medical consequences for victims. Though programs to combat this mistreatment have been developed and implemented for more than three decades, previous systematic literature reviews have found few successful ones. Objective: To conduct a more comprehensive examination of programs to improve elder mistreatment identification, intervention, or prevention, including those that had not undergone evaluation. Design: Systematic review. Setting: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO Elton B. Stephens Co. (EBSCO), AgeLine, CINAHL. Measurements: We abstracted key information about each program and categorized programs into 14 types and 9 subtypes. For programs that reported an impact evaluation, we systematically assessed the study quality. We also systematically examined the potential for programs to be successfully implemented in environments with limited resources available. Results: We found 116 articles describing 115 elder mistreatment programs. Of these articles, 43% focused on improving prevention, 50% focused on identification, and 95% focused on intervention, with 66% having multiple foci. The most common types of program were: educational (53%), multidisciplinary team (MDT) (21%), psychoeducation/therapy/counseling (15%), and legal services/support (8%). Of the programs, 13% integrated an acute‐care hospital, 43% had high potential to work in low‐resource environments, and 57% reported an attempt to evaluate program impact, but only 2% used a high‐quality study design. Conclusion: Many programs to combat elder mistreatment have been developed and implemented, with the majority focusing on education and MDT development. Though more than half reported evaluation of program impact, few used high‐quality study design. Many have the potential to work in low‐resource environments. Acute‐care hospitals were infrequently integrated into programs. See related editorial by Kathleen Wilber in this issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To describe the Texas Elder Abuse and Mistreatment Institute Forensic Assessment Center Network (TEAM‐FACN), a novel statewide elder mistreatment (EM) virtual assessment program using low‐cost videophone technology and innovative web‐based coordination to connect an Adult Protective Services (APS) agency and its clients, rural and urban, to a centralized geriatric and EM expert medical team for virtual in‐home assessments. Design: Descriptive. Setting: Community. Participants: APS clients aged 18 and older. Intervention: Virtual and in‐home assessments. Measurements: Program use and type of services provided. Results: In the first 8 months, 300 APS clients from all regions of the state were referred for assessment. Outcomes realized include a quadrupling in number of client assessments. TEAM‐FACN physicians provided an average of 2 services, which included 216 mental health assessments, with 123 conducted virtually; 42 medical assessments; 45 guardianship filings; 5 employee misconduct registry reviews; and more than 230 interdisciplinary team meetings to discuss case findings, safety plans, and medical and social interventions. Conclusion: TEAM‐FACN provides an innovative and viable way to increase access of urban and rural older and adults who are being mistreated to expert geriatric and EM protective service assessments. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:151–155, 2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute Care for the Elderly (ACE) units have successfully decreased length of stay, hospital costs, and readmission rates. Furthermore, patients return home with increased functional capacity and improved satisfaction with their hospital stay. The ACE unit concept was geared toward patients returning to independent living, but the average hospitalized geriatric patient is increasingly more frail, vulnerable, and dependent. The purpose of this study is 2-fold: (1) to determine if the ACE unit continues to offer the same benefit to the frail, often bedbound elderly, and (2) to determine if such a unit is able to maintain standard hospital quality indicators. A total of 1096 cases discharged from the Memorial-Hermann ACE unit between July 2008 and June 2010 were compared to a sample of 383 patients with similar illness severity who were discharged between July 2007 and June 2008. Metrics measured include: average length of stay (ALOS), case mix index (CMI), case mix adjusted average length of stay (CMI adj ALOS), average direct costs per case, and readmission rate. Patient satisfaction was measured using Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems and Press-Ganey surveys; quality and safety data were provided by Memorial-Hermann's Quality and Safety Department. The ACE unit resulted in a statistically significant decrease in ALOS and CMI adj LOS with a simultaneous increase in Health Care Financing Administration CMI, indicating that the unit was serving a sicker, more frail population. The readmission rate was 11.95%. The decrease in length of stay, readmission rate, and direct cost translates into a decrease in cost per case. Furthermore, the ACE unit successfully met hospital quality indicators. ( Population Health Management 2012;15:236-240) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]