Review of Programs to Combat Elder Mistreatment: Focus on Hospitals and Level of Resources Needed.

Background: Elder mistreatment is common and has serious social and medical consequences for victims. Though programs to combat this mistreatment have been developed and implemented for more than three decades, previous systematic literature reviews have found few successful ones. Objective: To conduct a more comprehensive examination of programs to improve elder mistreatment identification, intervention, or prevention, including those that had not undergone evaluation. Design: Systematic review. Setting: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO Elton B. Stephens Co. (EBSCO), AgeLine, CINAHL. Measurements: We abstracted key information about each program and categorized programs into 14 types and 9 subtypes. For programs that reported an impact evaluation, we systematically assessed the study quality. We also systematically examined the potential for programs to be successfully implemented in environments with limited resources available. Results: We found 116 articles describing 115 elder mistreatment programs. Of these articles, 43% focused on improving prevention, 50% focused on identification, and 95% focused on intervention, with 66% having multiple foci. The most common types of program were: educational (53%), multidisciplinary team (MDT) (21%), psychoeducation/therapy/counseling (15%), and legal services/support (8%). Of the programs, 13% integrated an acute‐care hospital, 43% had high potential to work in low‐resource environments, and 57% reported an attempt to evaluate program impact, but only 2% used a high‐quality study design. Conclusion: Many programs to combat elder mistreatment have been developed and implemented, with the majority focusing on education and MDT development. Though more than half reported evaluation of program impact, few used high‐quality study design. Many have the potential to work in low‐resource environments. Acute‐care hospitals were infrequently integrated into programs. See related editorial by Kathleen Wilber in this issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]