Search

Ectopic acromegaly is a rare condition caused by extrapituitary central or peripheral neuroendocrine tumours (NET) that hypersecrete GH or, more commonly, GHRH. It affects less than 1% of acromegaly patients and a misdiagnosis of classic acromegaly can lead to an inappropriate pituitary surgery. Four types of ectopic acromegaly have been described: 1) Central ectopic GH-secretion: Careful cross-sectional imaging is required to exclude ectopic pituitary adenomas. 2) Peripheral GH secretion: Extremely rare. 3) Central ectopic GHRH secretion: Sellar gangliocytomas immunohistochemically positive for GHRH are found after pituitary surgery. 4) Peripheral GHRH secretion: The most common type of ectopic acromegaly is due to peripheral GHRH-secreting NETs. Tumours are large and usually located in the lungs or pancreas. Pituitary hyperplasia resulting from chronic GHRH stimulation is difficult to detect or can be misinterpreted as pituitary adenoma in the MRI. Measurement of serum GHRH levels is a specific and useful diagnostic tool. Surgery of GHRH-secreting NETs is often curative., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) must be confirmed before starting treatment in adults with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS). Most studies use the growth-hormone-releasing hormone plus arginine (GHRH-arginine) test. No data are available on the glucagon stimulation test (GST) in PWS. We compared the utility of fixed-dose (1 mg) GST versus GHRH-arginine test in diagnosing GHD., Methods: Adults and late adolescents with PWS underwent both tests on separate days. In the GHRH-arginine test, GHD was defined according to body mass index. In the GST, two cutoffs were analyzed: peak GH concentration < 3 ng/mL and < 1 ng/mL. For analyses, patients were divided into two groups according to body weight (≤ 90 kg and > 90 kg)., Results: We analyzed 34 patients: 22 weighing ≤ 90 kg and 12 weighing > 90 kg. In patients weighing ≤ 90 kg, the two tests were concordant in 16 (72.72%) patients (k = 0.476, p = 0.009 with GST cutoff < 3 ng/mL, and k = 0.450, p = 0.035 with GST cutoff < 1 ng/mL). In patients weighing > 90 kg, the two tests were not concordant with GST cutoff < 3 ng/mL, but were concordant in 11 (91.6%) patients (k = 0.833, p = 0.003) with GST cutoff < 1 ng/mL. GH peaks on the two tests correlated (r = 0.725, p = 0.008)., Conclusion: Fixed-dose (1 mg) GST using a peak GH cutoff of < 3 ng/mL or < 1 ng/mL promises to be useful for screening for GHD in adults and late adolescents with PWS. However, in those weighing > 90 kg, the < 1 ng/mL cutoff seems better. Larger studies are necessary to establish definitive glucagon doses and cutoffs, especially in extremely obese patients.

Depression affects a large proportion of patients with epilepsy, and is likely due in part to biological mechanism. Hormonal dysregulation due to the disruptive effects of seizures and interictal epileptiform discharges on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis likely contributes to high rates of depression in epilepsy. This paper reviews the largely unexplored role of neuroendocrine factors in epilepsy-related depression, focusing on Growth Hormone (GH). While GH deficiency is traditionally considered a childhood disorder manifested by impaired skeletal growth, GH deficiency in adulthood is now recognized as a serious disorder characterized by impairments in multiple domains including mood and quality of life. Could high rates of depression in patients with epilepsy relate to subtle GH deficiency? Because GH replacement therapy has been shown to improve mood and quality of life in patients with GH deficiency, this emerging area may hold promise for patients suffering from epilepsy-related depression., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Growth Hormone (GH) deficiency is frequent in HIV-infected patients treated with antiretroviral therapy. We treated GH3 cells with antiretrovirals (nevirapine, ritonavir or abacavir sulfate; 100 pM-1 mM range), after transfection with human growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) receptor cDNA. Cells viability, intracellular cAMP, phosphorylation of CREB and calcium increase, GH production and secretion were evaluated both in basal condition and after GHRH, using MTT, bioluminescence resonance energy transfer, western blotting and ELISA. Antiretroviral treatment did not affect GHRH 50% effective dose (EC 50 ) calculated for 30-min intracellular cAMP increase (Mann-Whitney's U test; p ≥ 0.05; n = 4) nor 15-min CREB phosphorylation. The kinetics of GHRH-mediated, rapid intracellular calcium increase was perturbed by pre-incubation with drugs, while GHRH failed to induce the ion increase in ritonavir pre-treated cells (ANOVA; p < 0.05; n = 3). Antiretrovirals did not impact 24-h intracellular and extracellular GH levels (ANOVA; p ≥ 0.05; n = 3). We demonstrated the association between antiretrovirals and intracellular calcium increase, without consequences on somatotrope cells viability and GH synthesis. Overall, these results suggest that antiretrovirals may not directly impact on GH axis in HIV-infected patients., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Changes in sleep-EEG after endocrine stimulation tests in patients with schizophrenia include reduced sleep efficiency, prolonged sleep latency and increased awaking after sleep onset Findings on sleep associated growth hormone (GH) secretion were ambiguous. The aim of this study was to elucidate the sleep-endocrine activity especially in the GH system of patients with schizophrenia after repeated administration of GHRH. The effect of repetitive injections of 4 × 50 μg GHRH between 22.00 and 01.00 h on sleep endocrine parameters was investigated in 9 patients diagnosed for schizophrenia. Patients did not receive any medication for one week. Concentrations of ACTH, cortisol, prolactin and GH were determined. Patients spent three consecutive nights in the sleep laboratory. Blood was taken every 20min. Results were compared with matched healthy controls. A non-significant prolonged sleep onset latency and increased time awake was found in patients compared to controls. Sleep stage 2 was significantly reduced in patients. No significant difference in ACTH and cortisol was detected, whereas the GH secretion in patients following GHRH stimulation was significantly elevated compared to controls. Our results in drug free patients confirm already known changes in sleep-EEG in these patients. The GH response to GHRH-stimulation indicates a different regulatory sensitivity of the system between daytime and night-time., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Twenty years ago, we described kindred of 105 individuals with isolated GH deficiency (IGHD) in Itabaianinha County, in northeast Brazil, carrying a homozygous mutation in the GH-releasing hormone receptor gene. These subjects exhibit markedly reduced GH responsiveness to stimulatory tests, and anterior pituitary hypoplasia. Serum concentrations of IGF-I, IGF binding protein type 3 and the acid-labile subunit are markedly reduced, with a lesser reduction of IGF-II. The most striking physical findings of these IGHD individuals are the proportionate short stature, doll facies, high-pitched voice and visceral obesity with reduced fat-free mass. There is neither microphallus, nor neonatal hypoglycemia. Puberty is delayed, menopause anticipated, but fertility is preserved in both genders. The reduction in bone sizes is not even, with mean standard deviation scores for height of -7.2, total maxillary length of -6.5, total facial height of -4.3 and cephalic perimeter of -2.7. In addition, the non-osseous growth is not uniform, preserving some organs, like pancreas, liver, kidney, brain and eyes, and compromising others such as thyroid, heart, uterus and spleen. These subjects present higher prevalence of dizziness, mild high-tones sensorineural hearing loss, reduction of vascular retinal branching points, increase of optic disk, genu valgum and increased systolic blood pressure. Biochemically, they have high low density lipoprotein cholesterol and C-reactive protein levels, but maintain increased insulin sensitivity, and do not show premature atherosclerosis. Finally, they have normal immune function, and normal longevity. This review details the findings and summarizes 20 years of clinical research carried out in this unique population., (© 2017 European Society of Endocrinology.)

Growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH) is produced by the hypothalamus and stimulates GH synthesis and release in the anterior pituitary gland. In addition to its endocrine role, GHRH exerts a wide range of extrapituitary effects which include stimulation of cell proliferation, survival and differentiation, and inhibition of apoptosis. Accordingly, expression of GHRH, as well as the receptor GHRH-R and its splice variants, has been demonstrated in different peripheral tissues and cell types. Among the direct peripheral activities, GHRH regulates pancreatic islet and β-cell survival and function and endometrial cell proliferation, promotes cardioprotection and wound healing, influences the immune and reproductive systems, reduces inflammation, indirectly increases lifespan and adiposity and acts on skeletal muscle cells to inhibit cell death and atrophy. Therefore, it is becoming increasingly clear that GHRH exerts important extrapituitary functions, suggesting potential therapeutic use of the peptide and its analogs in a wide range of medical settings.

The objective of this analysis was to characterize the time course of selected pharmacodynamic (PD) markers of tesamorelin: growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) concentrations in HIV-infected patients and healthy volunteers. A total of 41 subjects in Phase I trials receiving subcutaneous daily doses of 1 or 2 mg of tesamorelin during 14 consecutive days were included in this analysis. A previous pharmacokinetic (PK) model of tesamorelin was used as the input function for the PD model of GH. Tesamorelin was hypothesized to stimulate the secretion of GH in an "episodic" manner, i.e., for a finite duration of time. The resulting PK/PD model of GH was used to describe the time course of IGF-1. The effect of age, body weight, body mass index, sex, race, and health status on the model parameters was evaluated. The model was qualified using predictive checks and non-parametric bootstrap. Within the range of the values evaluated no covariates were significantly associated with GH or IGF-1 model parameters. Model evaluation procedures indicated accurate prediction of the selected pharmacodynamic markers. The time course of GH and IGF-1 concentrations following multiple doses of tesamorelin were well predicted by the sequential PK/PD model developed using Phase I data.

Increased visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is associated with reductions in endogenous GH secretion, possibly as a result of hyperinsulinemia, increased circulating free fatty acid, increased somatostatin tone, and reduced ghrelin. Reduced GH may, in turn, further exacerbate visceral fat accumulation because of decreased hormone-sensitive lipolysis in this depot. Data from multiple populations demonstrate that both reduced GH and increased VAT appear to contribute independently to dyslipidemia, increased systemic inflammation, and increased cardiovascular risk. The reductions in GH in states of visceral adiposity are characterized by reduced basal and pulsatile GH secretion with intact pulse frequency. Treatment with GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) provides a means to reverse these abnormalities, increasing endogenous basal and pulsatile GH secretion without altering pulse frequency. This review describes data from HIV-infected individuals and individuals with general obesity showing that treatment with GHRH significantly reduces visceral fat, ameliorates dyslipidemia, and reduces markers of cardiovascular risk. Further research is needed regarding the long-term efficacy and safety of this treatment modality., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The quantitative and qualitative aspects of the pituitary response in children and adults with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) are compared in order to verify the possible age-dependent and genotype-related differences in terms of GH secretion., Design: 29 young subjects (21 males and 8 females) and 65 adults (24 males and 41 females) with PWS were studied. All subjects underwent a standard GH Releasing Hormone (GHRH 1-29, 1 μg/kg as i.v. bolus at 0 minutes)+arginine (0.5 g/kg) test. Peak GH values, standard GH area under the curve (AUC), AUC of the instantaneous secretion rate (ISR), and secretion response analysis (i.e. half-secretion time) were evaluated. A regression analysis was performed to investigate which are the patient characteristics that affect the amplitude and shape of the GH secretion response., Results: Peak GH values and AUCGH were significantly higher in PWS children than in PWS adults, these differences being also significant both in PWS DEL15 (only peak GH value) and PWS UPD15. Moreover, PWS children showed significantly lower half secretion time than PWS adults, this delayed response being present both in PWS DEL15 and PWS UPD15. Significant negative correlations between AUCGH and BMISDS were observed in the two groups (adults and children), as well as in adults and children DEL15, but not in adults and children PWS UPD15. A regression analysis performed on the whole dataset showed that for PWS DEL15 the statistically significant variable explaining GH responsiveness was BMISDS (p<0.0001), while for UPD15 no statistically significant covariate was found. Conversely, when the delay of the secretion response was considered, the regression model yielding the best performances was the one with only age as a regressor (p<0.001)., Conclusions: The quantitative and qualitative analyses of GH responsiveness to GHRH+arginine highlight relevant differences between PWS children and PWS adults and genotype-related traits. The negative influence of BMISDS on GH secretion reinforces the need for an early start of life-long weight management in PWS subjects., (© 2013.)

Objective: Estrogen stimulates pulsatile secretion of GH, via mechanisms that are largely unknown. An untested hypothesis is that estradiol (E₂) drives GH secretion by amplifying interactions among GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), somatostatin (SS), and GH-releasing peptide (GHRP)., Design: The design comprised double-blind randomized prospective administration of transdermal E₂ vs placebo to healthy postmenopausal women (n=24) followed by pulsatile GHRH or SS infusions for 13 h overnight with or without continuous GHRP2 stimulation., Methods: End points were mean concentrations, deconvolved secretion, and approximate entropy (ApEn; a regularity measure) of GH., Results: By generalized ANOVA models, it was observed that E₂ vs placebo supplementation: i) augmented mean (13-h) GH concentrations (P=0.023), GHRH-induced pulsatile GH secretion over the first 3 h (P=0.0085) and pulsatile GH secretion over the next 10 h (P=0.054); ii) increased GHRP-modulated (P=0.022) and SS-modulated (P<0.001) GH ApEn; and iii) did not amplify GHRH/GHRP synergy during pulsatile GH secretion. By linear regression, E₂ concentrations were found to be positively correlated with GH secretion during GHRP2 infusion (P=0.022), whereas BMI was found to be negatively correlated with GH secretion during GHRH (P=0.006) and combined GHRH/GHRP (P=0.015) stimulation. E₂ and BMI jointly determined triple (combined l-arginine, GHRH, and GHRP2) stimulation of GH secretion after saline (R²=0.44 and P=0.003) and pulsatile GHRH (R²=0.39 and P=0.013) infusions., Conclusion: In summary, in postmenopausal women, E₂ supplementation augments the amount (mass) and alters the pattern (regularity) of GH secretion via interactions among GHRH, SS, GHRP, and BMI. These outcomes introduce a more complex model of E₂ supplementation in coordinating GH secretion in aging women.

Objective: The assessment of GH deficiency in adult patients with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) has been previously assessed through the evaluation of quantitative parameters, such as the peak value of GH response to exogenous stimuli. A comprehensive description of the pattern of secretory response obtainable by deconvolution analysis is still lacking. The aim of our study was to characterize the time evolution of responses of PWS subjects compared with obese controls., Design and Subjects: GH responsiveness was measured following the combined administration of GHRH+arginine to 65 PWS adults (24 males, 41 females) aged 18-41·2 years, and 17 age-, gender- and body mass index-matched obese controls. PWS subjects were analysed considering the stratification on different genotypes., Measurements: GH response to GHRH+arginine was analysed in terms of peak values, standard area under the curves (AUCs), AUCs due to the stimulus, AUCs of the Instantaneous Secretion Rate signal and Secretion Response Analysis., Results: In terms of both peak values and AUC, GH responses were statistically different between PWS UPD15 and PWS DEL15 subjects as well as between PWS UPD15 and obese controls. PWS subjects showed a lower and a more delayed GH response compared with obese controls. Moreover, PWS UPD15 subjects had the most delayed GH response., Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that impaired GH secretion in PWS subjects compared with obese controls regards not only amplitude parameters such as peak value and AUC, but also the shape of the secretory response, which is more delayed, especially for UPD15 subjects., (© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: Insulin tolerance test (ITT) is the test of reference for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency (GHD), although GHRH in combination with arginine (ARG) or GH secretagogues are considered equally reliable tests. Testing with GH secretagogue alone is, anyway, a potent stimulus exploring the integrity of hypothalamic pathways controlling somatotropic function. We therefore aimed to determine the diagnostic reliability of testing with ghrelin, the natural GH secretagogue., Methods: We studied the GH response (every 15 MIN from 15 TO +120 MIN) to acylated ghrelin (1G/KG I.V. AT 0MIN) IN 78 patients with a history of pituitary disease (49 male, 29 female; age (MEANS.D.): 52.1±18.7 years; BMI: 26.7±5.3 kg/m(2)). The lack of GH response to GHRH+ARG and/or ITT was considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of GHD. The best GH cut-off to ghrelin test, defined as the one with the best sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP), was identified using the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis., Results: The best GH cut-off to ghrelin test was 7.3 μg/l in lean subjects (SE 88.2%, SP 90.9%), 2.9 μg/l in overweight subjects (SE 92.6%, SP 100%) and 0.6 μg/l in obese subjects (SE 50%, SP 100%). The diagnostic accuracy was 89.3, 94.1 and 62.5% respectively., Conclusions: Our data show that testing with acylated ghrelin represents a reliable diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of adult GHD, in lean and overweight subjects, if appropriate cut-off limits are assumed. Obesity strongly reduces GH response to ghrelin, GH weight-related cut-off limit and diagnostic reliability of the test.

Context: Obesity is associated with reduced GH secretion and increased cardiovascular disease risk., Objective: We performed this study to determine the effects of augmenting endogenous GH secretion on body composition and cardiovascular disease risk indices in obese subjects with reduced GH secretion., Design, Patients and Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed involving 60 abdominally obese subjects with reduced GH secretion. Subjects received tesamorelin, a GHRH(1-44) analog, 2 mg once daily, or placebo for 12 months. Abdominal visceral adipose tissue (VAT) was assessed by abdominal computed tomography scan, and carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) was assessed by ultrasound. Treatment effect was determined by longitudinal linear mixed-effects modeling., Results: VAT [-16 ± 9 vs.19 ± 9 cm(2), tesamorelin vs. placebo; treatment effect (95% confidence interval): -35 (-58, -12) cm(2); P = 0.003], cIMT (-0.03 ± 0.01 vs. 0.01 ± 0.01 mm; -0.04 (-0.07, -0.01) mm; P = 0.02), log C-reactive protein (-0.17 ± 0.04 vs. -0.03 ± 0.05 mg/liter; -0.15 (-0.30, -0.01) mg/liter, P = 0.04), and triglycerides (-26 ± 16 vs. 12 ± 8 mg/dl; -37 (-67, -7) mg/dl; P = 0.02) improved significantly in the tesamorelin group vs. placebo. No significant effects on abdominal sc adipose tissue (-6 ± 6 vs. 3 ± 11 cm(2); -10 (-32, +13) cm(2); P = 0.40) were seen. IGF-I increased (86 ± 21 vs. -6 ± 8 μg/liter; 92 (+52, +132) μg/liter; P < 0.0001). No changes in fasting, 2-h glucose, or glycated hemoglobin were seen. There were no serious adverse events or differences in adverse events between the groups., Conclusion: Among obese subjects with relative reductions in GH, tesamorelin selectively reduces VAT without significant effects on sc adipose tissue and improves triglycerides, C-reactive protein, and cIMT, without aggravating glucose.

Context: Ghrelin is a potent endogenous stimulator of GH secretion. However, clinical factors that regulate ghrelin dose-responsiveness are incompletely defined., Objective: The aim of the study was to test the multipathway hypothesis that testosterone (T) and estradiol, GHRH, and somatostatin (SS) jointly modulate ghrelin's action., Design/participants/setting: Healthy older men (n = 21) participated in a double-blind, prospectively randomized, placebo (Pl)-controlled study in a Clinical Translational Research Center., Interventions: To create a range of sex-steroid milieus, men received leuprolide + Pl (n = 10) or leuprolide + T addback (n = 11). Sixteen to 21 d later, subjects received three separate randomly ordered overnight constant i.v. infusions of saline, GHRH, and SS. Interactions between the peptide clamp and ghrelin were tested by superimposed injections of four randomly ordered bolus i.v. doses of ghrelin (0.03, 0.135, 0.60, and 2.7 μg/kg). GH was measured every 10 min, and GH responses were assessed by nonlinear dose-response analysis. Linear associations were assessed by stepwise regression., Outcome Measures/results: The descending numerical order of ghrelin efficacy (maximal GH secretory-burst mass; micrograms/liter) was 107 (GHRH + Pl), 104 (GHRH + T), 73 (saline + T), 73 (SS + T), 60 (saline + Pl), and 52 (SS + Pl) [means], wherein SS + T exceeded SS + Pl. GHRH and IGF binding protein-1 augmented, whereas IGF-I attenuated ghrelin potency. Age and IGF-I decreased ghrelin/GHRH synergy. Ghrelin sensitivity was independent of interventions., Conclusions: These studies introduce composite regulatory effects of sex hormones, GHRH, SS, IGF binding protein-1, and IGF-I on ghrelin dose-responsiveness, suggesting multipathway modulation of GH-secretagogue action.

Context: GH negatively regulates its own secretion. How gender, sex steroids, and secretagogues modulate GH autofeedback is not known., Hypothesis/objective: Supplementation with sex steroids and/or a peptidyl secretagogue will enhance the escape of GH from autoinhibition, thus framing a mechanism for amplifying pulsatile GH secretion., Subjects and Setting: Ten healthy postmenopausal women and 10 comparably aged men participated at the Clinical-Translational Science Unit., Design/interventions: Randomly ordered, double-blind, prospective crossover treatment with placebo vs. testosterone (men) or placebo vs. estradiol (women). Autofeedback was imposed by an iv pulse of GH. Recovery of feedback inhibition was quantified during constant infusion of saline, GHRH, or GH-releasing peptide-2 (three peptide categories)., Outcomes/results: During negative feedback, total (integrated) GH recovery depended upon gender (P = 0.017), sex hormone (P < 0.001), and peptide category (P < 0.001). Mechanistic analysis revealed that feedback-suppressed nadir GH concentrations were determined by sex-steroid treatment (P = 0.018) but not by gender (P = 0.444). Peak GH escape was controlled by both treatment (P = 0.004) and gender (P = 0.003). Nadir GH and peak GH during feedback were enhanced by GHRH or GHRP-2 (P < 0.001 for both). Gender × peptide (P = 0.012 for nadir GH), treatment × peptide (P < 0.001 total and peak GH), and gender × treatment (P = 0.017 nadir GH) regulated GH recovery interactively., Conclusion: Gender, sex-steroid supplementation, and secretagogue type confer distinct feedback-rescuing effects, introducing a new level of complexity in the control of pulsatile GH regulation.

Metabolic complications are common in treated HIV patients. Their etiology is multifactorial and the development of increased abdominal fat contributes to cardiovascular risk and impaired quality of life. Treated patients with fat mass distribution changes have relative growth hormone deficiency. Both pharmacologic and physiologic doses of growth hormone reduce the increased visceral adipose tissue and improve the associated abnormal lipid profiles in short-term studies. However, impaired glucose homeostasis changes and significant musculoskeletal toxicity occurs. A novel growth hormone-releasing factor analogue, tesamorelin, provides a physiologic means of restoring a normal growth hormone secretion profile and reduces increased visceral adipose tissue, improving both abnormal lipid profiles and patients' quality of life. Glucose homeostasis is generally well maintained. Cessation of treatment with either growth hormone or tesamorelin results in a prompt return of truncal obesity. Management strategies for the long-term maintenance of the reduced visceral adipose tissue have not yet been clarified and long-term effects on decreasing cardiovascular risks and improving clinical outcomes are uncertain., (Copyright 2011 Prous Science, S.A.U. or its licensors. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The ternary complex is composed of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-3 and acid labile subunit (ALS). Growth hormone (GH) promotes IGFBP-3 proteolysis to release free IGF-I, ALS, and IGFBP-3 fragments. Our aim was to determine whether elevated GH levels during GH stimulation testing would trigger IGFBP-3 proteolysis., Design: This prospective study of 10 short prepubertal children (height standard deviation score -2.37 +/- 0.31) used arginine and GH releasing hormone stimulation to study dynamic changes in the ternary complex moieties. IGFBP-3 was measured in two assays: a radioimmunoassay (RIA) that detects both cleaved and intact IGFBP-3; and an immunochemiluminescence assay (ICMA) that detects only intact IGFBP-3., Results: IGFBP-3 measured by RIA increased by 19% (p < 0.05), while IGFBP-3 measured by ICMA did not significantly increase (6.1%)., Conclusion: The significant increase in IGFBP-3 measured by RIA, but not ICMA, provides evidence of IGFBP-3 proteolysis during acute GH stimulation.

In type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), growth hormone (GH) responses to provocative stimuli are normal or exaggerated, whereas the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis has been less studied. Ghrelin is a GH secretagogue that also increases adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol levels, similarly to GH-releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6). Ghrelin's effects in patients with T1DM have not been evaluated. We therefore studied GH, ACTH, and cortisol responses to ghrelin and GHRP-6 in 9 patients with T1DM and 9 control subjects. The GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced GH release was also evaluated. Mean fasting GH levels (micrograms per liter) were higher in T1DM (3.5 ± 1.2) than in controls (0.6 ± 0.3). In both groups, ghrelin-induced GH release was higher than that after GHRP-6 and GHRH. When analyzing Δ area under the curve (ΔAUC) GH values after ghrelin, GHRP-6, and GHRH, no significant differences were observed in T1DM compared with controls. There was a trend (P = .055) to higher mean basal cortisol values (micrograms per deciliter) in T1DM (11.7 ± 1.5) compared with controls (8.2 ± 0.8). No significant differences were seen in ΔAUC cortisol values in both groups after ghrelin and GHRP-6. Mean fasting ACTH values were similar in T1DM and controls. No differences were seen in ΔAUC ACTH levels in both groups after ghrelin and GHRP-6. In summary, patients with T1DM have normal GH responsiveness to ghrelin, GHRP-6, and GHRH. The ACTH and cortisol release after ghrelin and GHRP-6 is also similar to controls. Our results suggest that chronic hyperglycemia of T1DM does not interfere with GH-, ACTH-, and cortisol-releasing mechanisms stimulated by these peptides., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

An autosomal dominant form of isolated GH deficiency (IGHD II) can result from heterozygous splice site mutations that weaken recognition of exon 3 leading to aberrant splicing of GH-1 transcripts and production of a dominant-negative 17.5-kDa GH isoform. Previous studies suggested that the extent of missplicing varies with different mutations and the level of GH expression and/or secretion. To study this, wt-hGH and/or different hGH-splice site mutants (GH-IVS+2, GH-IVS+6, GH-ISE+28) were transfected in rat pituitary cells expressing human GHRH receptor (GC-GHRHR). Upon GHRH stimulation, GC-GHRHR cells coexpressing wt-hGH and each of the mutants displayed reduced hGH secretion and intracellular GH content when compared with cells expressing only wt-hGH, confirming the dominant-negative effect of 17.5-kDa isoform on the secretion of 22-kDa GH. Furthermore, increased amount of 17.5-kDa isoform produced after GHRH stimulation in cells expressing GH-splice site mutants reduced production of endogenous rat GH, which was not observed after GHRH-induced increase in wt-hGH. In conclusion, our results support the hypothesis that after GHRH stimulation, the severity of IGHD II depends on the position of splice site mutation leading to the production of increasing amounts of 17.5-kDa protein, which reduces the storage and secretion of wt-GH in the most severely affected cases. Due to the absence of GH and IGF-I-negative feedback in IGHD II, a chronic up-regulation of GHRH would lead to an increased stimulatory drive to somatotrophs to produce more 17.5-kDa GH from the severest mutant alleles, thereby accelerating autodestruction of somatotrophs in a vicious cycle.

Background: GH excess predisposes to insulin resistance (IR). Obese patients have blunted responses to GH stimulation and decreased spontaneous secretion. GH secretion has not been studied in the context of IR.ŗŗ, Objective: To determine whether varying degrees of IR effects GH dynamics in obese children., Patients/design: Patients (all > 10 y) were categorized according to gender and HOMA-IR to have either mild or severe IR. Twenty patients (10 female) with mild IR completed the study, as did 18 (9 female) in the severe group. Each patient underwent a GH stimulation test with GHRH. GH peak and area under the curve (AUC) were compared between the groups., Results: Severe IR females had higher peak GH (mean +/- SD, 9.5 +/- 4.4 vs. 5.8 +/- 3.7 ng/dl, p = 0.04) and trended toward higher GH AUC (356 +/- 207 vs. 221 +/- 128, p = 0.06) than mild IR females. There were no differences in GH response in males,, Conclusions: There may be a positive relationship between severity of IR and peak GH in obese girls.

Niemczyk et al. treated predialysis chronic kidney disease patients with a new growth hormone-releasing hormone agonist, AKL-0707, and noted important changes in body composition characterized by an increase in fat-free mass, a modest rise in bone mineral content, and a reduction in fat mass. These changes were accompanied by a reduction in both serum urea nitrogen and normalized protein nitrogen appearance rate, while dietary protein intake was unchanged. Importantly, there were no serious adverse events.

Chronic kidney disease is frequently associated with protein-energy wasting related to chronic inflammation and a resistance to anabolic hormones such as insulin and growth hormone (GH). In this study, we determined whether a new GH-releasing hormone super-agonist (AKL-0707) improved the anabolism and nutritional status of nondialyzed patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease randomized to twice daily injections of the super-agonist or placebo. After 28 days, this treatment significantly increased 24-h GH secretion by almost 400%, without altering the frequency or rhythmicity of secretory bursts or fractional pulsatile GH release, and doubled the serum insulin-like growth factor-1 level. There was a significant change in the Subjective Global Assessment from 'mildly to moderately malnourished' to 'well-nourished' in 6 of 9 patients receiving AKL-0707 but in none of 10 placebo-treated patients. By dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, both the mean fat-free mass and the body mineral content increased, but fat mass decreased, all significantly. In the AKL-0707-treated group, both serum urea and normalized protein equivalent of nitrogen appearance significantly decreased with no change in dietary protein intake, indicating a protein anabolic effect of treatment. Thus, our study shows that stimulation of endogenous GH secretion by AKL-0707 overcomes uremic catabolism of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease.

Growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) is one of the hypothalamus hormones. For its potential applications in agriculture and medicine, GHRH analog with higher activity and longer half-life has been looked for. By using the fusion expression with unique acid labile linker Asp-Pro and biochemical purification, the three novel GHRH peptides, Pro-Pro-hGHRH(1-44)-Gly-Gly-Cys, Pro-hGHRH(1-44)-Gly-Gly-Cys, and (1)Pro-GHRH(2-44)-Gly-Gly-Cys, were obtained. The peptide molecular weight with 5,455, 5,373 or 5,210 Da measured by EIS-MS is coincident with the actual values. The peptides at 0.1-10 microg/ml increased rat pituitary GH releases in a dose-dependent manner and at 5 microg/ml increased human pituitary GH releases. The activity comparisons showed that at 10 microg/ml there were significant between (1)Pro-hGHRH(2-44)-Gly-Gly-Cys and Pro-Pro-hGHRH(1-44)-Gly-Gly-Cys or Pro-hGHRH(1-44)-Gly-Gly-Cys, (1)Pro-hGHRH(2-44) (P<0.05). The (1)Pro-hGHRH(2-44)-Gly-Gly-Cys showed the highest GH release from rat pituitary. The activity results showed that the N-terminal Pro modulations and the C-terminal Gly-Gly-Cys extension regulate GH release from pituitary. The results showed that the three peptides had good GH release, function-selectivity and species specificity.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between GHRH-induced GH secretion in obese premenopausal women and cardiovascular risk markers or insulin resistance. Premenopausal obese women, aged 35-52 years, were studied. GH secretion, IGF-I, serum cardiovascular risk markers, insulin, leptin, mid-waist and hip circumference, total body fat, and truncal fat were measured. Subjects were classified as meeting the criteria for GH deficiency (GHD) when peak GH after stimulation with GHRH was

Context: GH-releasing peptide (GHRP), GHRH, and somatostatin are physiological regulators of pulsatile GH secretion., Hypothesis: Age, independently of abdominal visceral fat (AVF) and basal (nonpulsatile) GH secretion, damps pulsatile GH secretion driven by physiological (rather than pharmacological) amounts of GHRP and GHRH in an experimentally controlled estradiol (E(2)) milieu., Design and Setting: A prospectively randomized, double-blind parallel-cohort study was conducted at an academic medical center., Participants: Community-dwelling healthy premenopausal (PRE, age 24 +/- 0.8 yr, n = 20) and postmenopausal (POST, age 63 +/- 1.8 yr, n = 22) women participated in the study., Interventions: Gonadal-axis down-regulation with leuprolide was followed by randomized addback of placebo or transdermal E(2) and separate-day iv bolus injections of a half-maximally stimulatory dose of GHRP-2 or GHRH (each 0.33 mug/kg)., Analysis: Three-way analysis of covariance included main factors age, E(2) status, and secretagogue type and covariates AVF and basal GH secretion., Results: Submaximally stimulated pulsatile GH secretion was positively determined by PRE vs. POST age (P < 0.001), E(2) repletion vs. depletion (P = 0.001) and GHRP-2 vs. GHRH stimulation (P < 0.001), after adjustment for AVF and basal secretion. E(2) vs. placebo elevated fasting mean GH concentrations in both PRE and POST women (P = 0.006) but increased basal (nonpulsatile) GH secretion in PRE only (P = 0.002). PRE vs. POST age prolonged GHRH-driven GH secretory bursts by 36% (P = 0.006)., Conclusion: PRE vs. POST age, E(2) availability, and physiological peptide drive are triple determinants of pulsatile GH secretion independently of abdominal visceral fat and nonpulsatile GH secretion in healthy women.

Objective: In Cushing's disease (CD), GH responsiveness to several stimuli, including ghrelin, GHRP-6, and GHRH, is blunted. Recovery of GH secretion after remission of hypercortisolism after transsphenoidal surgery, radiotherapy, or adrenalectomy is controversial. There are no studies evaluating the effect of primary clinical treatment with ketoconazole on GH secretion in CD. The aim of this study is to compare ghrelin-, GHRP-6-, and GHRH-induced GH release before and after ketoconazole in CD., Design: GH responses to ghrelin, GHRP-6, and GHRH of eight untreated patients with CD (mean age: 33.8+/-3.1 years; body mass index: 28.5+/-0.8 kg/m(2)) were evaluated before and after 3 and 6 months of ketoconazole treatment, and compared with 11 controls (32.1+/-2.5; 25.0+/-0.8). Methods Serum GH was measured by an immunofluorometric assay and urinary free cortisol (UFC) by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry., Results: After ketoconazole use, mean UFC decreased significantly (before: 222.4+/-35.0 microg/24 h; third month: 61.6+/-10.1; sixth month: 39.1+/-10.9). Ghrelin-induced GH secretion increased significantly after 6 months (peak before: 6.8+/-2.3 microg/l; sixth month: 16.0+/-3.6), but remained lower than that of controls (54.1+/-11.2). GH release after GHRP-6 increased, although not significantly, while GH responsiveness to GHRH was unchanged., Conclusions: Ghrelin-induced GH release increases significantly after 6 months of ketoconazole treatment in CD. This could suggest that a decrease in cortisol levels during this time period can partially restore glucocorticoid-induced GH suppression in CD. GH-releasing mechanisms stimulated by ghrelin/GHS could be more sensitive, as no changes in GHRH-induced GH release were observed.

Context: Visceral adiposity is a strong determinant of GH secretion, and low endogenous GH secretion is associated with increased insulin resistance, a key component of the metabolic syndrome. Increased fat accumulation in skeletal muscle and liver may play an etiological role in the development of insulin resistance and other complications of the metabolic syndrome. Little is known about the role of decreased endogenous GH secretion in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance in obesity., Objective: To investigate the relationship between intramyocellular lipids (IMCL), intrahepatic lipids, and peak-stimulated GH in premenopausal women with obesity., Design and Setting: We conducted a cross-sectional study at a clinical translational research center., Patients: Patients included 21 premenopausal women with obesity (mean body mass index, 34.0 +/- 4.5 kg/m(2)) and 17 normal-weight controls (mean body mass index, 21.9 +/- 2.0 kg/m(2)) of comparable mean age., Main Outcomes Measures: IMCL and intrahepatic lipids were measured with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS). Body composition was measured with magnetic resonance imaging. Peak GH was measured after stimulation with GHRH-arginine., Results: Obese subjects had higher IMCL, intrahepatic lipids, abdominal and thigh fat, and thigh muscle mass compared with normal-weight controls. There were strong inverse associations between peak GH and both IMCL and intrahepatic lipids independent of age and visceral adiposity. There were positive associations between IMCL and intrahepatic lipids with measures of insulin resistance and serum triglycerides., Conclusion: In premenopausal women with obesity, peak GH is inversely associated with IMCL and intrahepatic lipids independent of age and visceral adiposity. This suggests that low GH may contribute to insulin resistance in obesity through effects on muscle and intrahepatic lipids.

Background: Somatostatin (SS), GHRH, GH-releasing peptide (GHRP), and the sex-steroid milieu regulate GH secretion., Objective: To test whether GHRH and GHRP remain effective secretagogs in the face of short-term hypogonadism., Design: Prospective, randomized double-blind., Methods: Healthy young men (n=24) received a GnRH agonist twice 3 weeks apart followed by placebo (n=13, Pl) or testosterone (n=11, testosterone) addback., Subjects: were then given consecutive i.v. infusions of l-arginine (to restrain SS outflow) and a maximally effective dose of GHRH or GHRP-2 (to test corresponding secretagog pathways)., Results: GH secretion stimulated by l-arginine/GHRH and by l-arginine/GHRP-2 was unaffected by combined testosterone/estradiol (E(2)) depletion. The low testosterone/E(2) milieu decreased basal (nonpulsatile) GH secretion (P=0.038), without altering fasting pulsatile GH secretion or IGF1 or IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-3 concentrations. IGFBP-1 (P<0.0001) and abdominal visceral fat (AVF, P=0.017) correlated negatively with fasting basal GH secretion. By contrast, IGF1 (P=0.0012) and IGFBP-3 (P=0.015) correlated positively with fasting pulsatile GH secretion. AVF (P=0.0024) was a negative determinant, and IGF1 a positive determinant (P=0.018), of GHRH-driven GH pulses. Responses to GHRP-2 were unrelated to any of these factors., Conclusion: l-arginine/GHRP-2 appears to be an especially robust stimulus of GH secretion, since efficacy is unmodified by profound short-term hypogonadism, a range of AVF estimates, and a spectrum of IGF1, IGFBP-1, and IGFBP-3 concentrations. Whether robustness also applies to chronic hypogonadism is not known.

Background: Sex steroids influence GH secretion in complex ways., Hypothesis: Analyses in a low sex-steroid milieu will help unveil the effects of age and other nonsteroidal regulators on GH secretion., Context: The study was conducted in a tertiary medical center., Subjects: The study group included 13 healthy young men and 12 healthy older men., Methods: We used GnRH agonist-induced down-regulation of testosterone and estradiol secretion, followed by consecutive infusion of l-arginine and GHRH or GHRP-2, to test secretagogue efficacies., Outcomes: We measured basal and pulsatile GH secretion., Results: During experimental testosterone/estradiol deprivation, older (57 +/- 1.7 yr) men maintained: 1) 6.8-fold less pulsatile GH secretion (P < 0.001); and 2) 2-fold lower maximal GH responses to GHRH (P = 0.0065) and GHRP-2 (P = 0.022) than young (23 +/- 1.1 yr old) individuals. Stepwise forward-selection regression analyses identified: 1) abdominal visceral fat as a dominant negative predictor of both GHRH (R(2) = 0.49; P = 0.001) and GHRP-2 (R(2) = 0.38; P = 0.005) efficacies; and 2) fasting IGF-I concentration as a major positive correlate of GHRH (R(2) = 0.52; P < 0.001) and GHRP-2 (R(2) = 0.31; P = 0.018) efficacies. Unstimulated pulsatile GH secretion was jointly correlated with IGF-I and IGFBP-3 (P = 0.039)., Conclusion: Measures of body composition (abdominal visceral fat) and pulsatile GH action (IGF-I) explain up to one half of interindividual variability in the efficacies of GHRH and GHRP-2 in sex steroid-depleted men. Accordingly, normative ranges for maximal single peptide-stimulated GH secretion in short-term hypogonadal states should incorporate the influence of these determinants as well as age.

Background: GH pulses are putatively initiated by hypothalamic GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), amplified by GH-releasing peptide (GHRP), and inhibited by somatostatin (SS)., Objective: To ascertain how secretagogues control the waveform (time evolution of release rates) as well as the mass of secretory bursts., Design: We quantified the shape of GH secretory bursts evoked by continuous combined i.v. infusion of maximally effective doses of GHRH and GHRP-2, and by bolus injection of each peptide after delivering L-arginine to restrain hypothalamic SS release in 12 healthy young men., Methods: A mathematically verified and experimentally validated variable-waveform deconvolution model was applied to intensively sampled GH time series., Results: The secretory-burst mode (time from burst onset to maximal secretion) was 19+/-0.69 min during saline infusion, and fell to a) 10.4+/-3.0 min during constant dual stimulation with GHRH/GHRP-2 (P<0.01), b) 14.6+/-1.8 min after l-arginine/GHRH (P<0.025), and c) 15.0+/-1.0 min after l-arginine/GHRH (P<0.01). Secretagogues augmented the mass of GH secreted in pulses by 44-, 42-, and 16-fold respectively, over saline (2.2+/-0.81 microg/l per h; P<0.001 for each). Pulse number and variability were unaffected. Applying the same methodology to ten other young men with acute leuprolide-induced hypogonadism yielded comparable waveform and mass estimates., Conclusion: The present analyses in men demonstrate that peptidyl secretagogues modulate not only the magnitude but also the time course of the GH-release process in vivo independently of the short-term sex-steroid milieu.

There is growing concern about the use of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) by individuals taking part in competitive sports. Although rhGH is banned by the international organizations, the detection of GH doping is difficult. We postulated that rhGH will suppress endogenous GH production, which can be assessed by the measurement of mRNA for GH and growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH). In order to prove this concept, we undertook a pilot study to examine whether circulating nucleic acids are useful in the detection of endogenous GH production. Blood samples were collected into PAXgene tubes from 37 healthy controls and 12 acromegalic patients. RNA was extracted from the samples, cDNA was obtained, and the quantities of mRNA for GH and GHRH were measured using real-time PCR. In acromegalic patients, median mRNA concentration for GHRH (corrected for beta-actin mRNA) was 30.7 times lower than in controls (median delta C(T)) value of -0.128 versus 3.927, P < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between serum IGF-1 SD score and mRNA for GHRH (r= 0.407). In acromegalic patients, mRNA for GH was significantly higher than in controls (median values of -4.694 versus -0.044, P < 0.05). As GH production is known to decline with age, we also examined mRNA for GH and GHRH according to age subgroups. Both markers were significantly lower in the older age group (>50 years) compared to the younger age group (<34 years). These results show that mRNA for GH and GHRH can be detected in the peripheral circulation and raises the possibility of using these markers in the detection of exogenously administered GH.

This article describes the long time consequences of the isolated and lifetime growth hormone (GH) deficiency using a single model of GH releasing hormone resistance (GHRH) due to a homozygous mutation in the GHRH receptor gene, in a hundred of subjects. These consequences include severe short stature with final height between -9.6 and -5.2 standard deviations below of the mean, with proportional reductions of the bone dimensions; reduction of the anterior pituitary corrected to cranial volume and the thyroid, the uterus, the spleen and left ventricular mass volume, all corrected to body surface, in contrast of pancreas and liver size, bigger than in controls, when equally corrected. Body composition features included marked reduction in the amount of fat free mass (kg) and increase of fat mass percentage, with predominant abdominal deposit. In the metabolic aspects, we find increase in the total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol; reduction of the insulin and the insulin resistance assessed by Homeostasis model assessment; increase of ultra sensitive C reactive protein and systolic body pressure in adults, although without evidences of premature atherosclerosis. Other findings include smaller bone resistance, although above of the threshold of fractures, delayed puberty, normal fertility, small parity, anticipated climacteric and normal quality of life.

Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin modulate growth hormone (GH) secretion. A third mechanism was discovered in the last decade, involving the action of growth hormone secretagogues (GHS). Ghrelin, the endogenous ligand of the GHS-receptor, is an acylated peptide mainly produced by the stomach, but also synthesized in the hypothalamus. This compound increases both GH release and food intake. Endogenous ghrelin might amplify the basic pattern of GH secretion, optimizing somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH, activating multiple interdependent intracellular pathways. However, its main site of action is the hypothalamus. In the current paper it is reviewed the available data on the discovery of this peptide, the mechanisms of action and possible physiological roles of the GHS and ghrelin on GH secretion, and finally, the possible therapeutic applications of these compounds.

Context: Sex steroid hormones potentiate whereas increased body mass index (BMI) represses GH secretion. Whether sex steroids modify the negative effect of BMI on secretagogue-induced GH secretion in men is not known. The issue is important in designing GH-stimulation regimens that are relatively insensitive to both gonadal status and adiposity., Objective: Our objective was to compare the relationships between BMI and peptide-stimulated GH secretion in men with normal and reduced testosterone and estradiol availability., Setting: The study was performed at an academic medical center., Subjects: Healthy young men were included in the study., Interventions: Randomized separate-day iv infusion of saline and/or maximally effective doses of L-arginine/GHRH, L-arginine/GH-releasing peptide (GHRP)-2, and GHRH/GHRP-2 in eugonadal (n=12) and experimentally hypogonadal (n=10) men was performed., Outcomes: Regression of paired secretagogue-induced GH responses on BMI was determined., Results: In eugonadal men, peak GH concentrations correlated negatively with BMI. In particular, BMI accounted for only 38% of the response variability after L-arginine/GHRH (P=0.0165), but 62% after GHRH/GHRP-2 (P=0.0012) and 65% after L-arginine/GHRP-2 (P=0.00075). In contrast, in hypogonadal men, GH responses were uncorrelated with BMI. The negative effects of BMI on peak GH responses in eugonadal and hypogonadal states differed most markedly after stimulation with GHRH/GHRP-2 (P=0.0019). This contrast was corroborated using integrated GH responses (P=0.0007)., Conclusions: Short-term experimental gonadal sex hormone depletion attenuates dual secretagogue-stimulated GH secretion in lean young men. The inhibitory effect of relative adiposity on GH secretion appears to predominate over that of acute sex steroid withdrawal.

Animal models of liver cirrhosis (LC) display a reduced hypothalamic somatostatinergic tone. To test whether a similar mechanism could explain the enhanced Growth Hormone (GH) secretory response to GH-Releasing Hormone (GHRH), which is seen in human LC, we studied the effect of the cholinesterase inhibitor pyridostigmine (PD), which is able to reduce the release of hypothalamic somatostatin (SS), on the GHRH-stimulated GH secretion. We considered that if PD were unable to increase GH secretion, this would constitute evidence of an already inhibited endogenous somatostatinergic tone. If proved, this in turn could explain the enhanced GH response to GHRH seen in LC. Ten LC patients and nine controls were given GHRH (100 microg, intravenously), or PD (120 mg, orally) plus GHRH. After GHRH alone, the GH peak was four times higher in LC than in controls (40.85+/-15.7 ng/ml in LC and 9.35+/-2.5 ng/ml in controls). In LC, PD administration markedly increased the GH response to GHRH (GH peak: 98.0+/-19.7 ng/ml; +240% vs. GHRH alone). The ability of PD to increase the GH response in patients with LC suggests that in this condition the enhanced GH response to GHRH is not due to a completely inhibited endogenous somatostatinergic tone. SS appears instead to maintain its modulator role on GH secretion in human LC, in contrast with what observed in animal models.

Background: Diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in childhood is usually based on growth hormone (GH) response to at least two provocative stimuli. The aim of this study was to determine whether sequential administration of arginine (Arg) plus GH releasing hormone (GHRH) could be a useful tool in evaluating GHD in children., Methods: Thirty patients with short stature (mean age 9.0 years) with decreased growth rate were tested for GHD with Arg and the insulin tolerance test (ITT). Patients with confirmed GHD (peak GH <8 ng/ml) were subsequently tested with Arg + GHRH., Results: Maximum GH stimulation for Arg and ITT was 6.3 (1.0-7.8) and 6.7 (0.5-7.7) ng/ml, respectively. Peak GH for the Arg + GHRH test was 36.3 (4.3-84.5) ng/ml and significantly different from the other provocative tests. Peak GH values for the three tests were not significantly correlated between tests or with clinical parameters. There were no significant differences in Arg + GHRH results between children with or without abnormal hypothalamic-pituitary MRI scans., Conclusion: Arg + GHRH gave higher GH levels than insulin or Arg alone. Because of the different causes of childhood GHD (hypothalamic and/or pituitary dysfunction), the Arg + GHRH test is unsuitable .for evaluating GHD and deciding whether GH replacement therapy is indicated.

Objective: To define the appropriate diagnostic cut-off limits for the GH response to GHRH+arginine (ARG) test and IGF-I levels, using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, in late adolescents and young adults., Design and Methods: We studied 152 patients with childhood-onset organic hypothalamic-pituitary disease (85 males, age (mean+/-s.e.m.): 19.2+/-0.2 years) and 201 normal adolescents as controls (96 males, age: 20.7+/-0.2 years). Patients were divided into three subgroups on the basis of the number of the other pituitary hormone deficits, excluding GH deficiency (GHD): subgroup A consisted of 35 panhypopituitary patients (17 males, age: 21.2+/-0.4 years), subgroup B consisted of 18 patients with only one or with no more than two pituitary hormone deficits (7 males, age: 20.2+/-0.9 years); and subgroup C consisted of 99 patients without any known hormonal pituitary deficits (60 males, age: 18.2+/-0.2 years). Both patients and controls were lean (body mass index, BMI<25 kg/m(2)). Patients in subgroup A were assumed to be GHD, whereas in patients belonging to subgroups B and C the presence of GHD had to be verified., Results: For the GHRH+ARG test, the best pair of highest sensitivity (Se; 100%) and specificity (Sp; 97%) was found choosing a peak GH of 19.0 microg/l. For IGF-I levels, the best pair of highest Se (96.6%) and Sp (74.6%) was found using a cut-off point of 160 microg/l (SDS: -1.3). Assuming 19.0 microg/l to be the cut-off point established for GHRH+ARG test, 72.2% of patients in subgroup B and 39.4% in subgroup C were defined as GHD. In patients belonging to group B and C and with a peak GH response <19 microg/l to the test, IGF-I levels were lower than 160 microg/l (or less than 1.3 SDS) in 68.7 and 41.6% of patients respectively predicting severe GHD in 85.7% of panhypopituitary patients (subgroup A)., Conclusions: In late adolescent and early adulthood patients, a GH cut-off limit using the GHRH+ARG test lower than 19.0 microg/l is able to discriminate patients with a suspicion of GHD and does not vary from infancy to early adulthood.

Context: Pseudohypoparathyroidism (PHP) types Ia and Ib, are caused by mutations in GNAS exons 1-13 and GNAS methylation defects, respectively. PHP-Ia patients show Albright hereditary osteodystrophy (AHO) and resistance toward PTH and additional hormones, whereas PHP-Ib patients do not have AHO and hormone resistance is limited to PTH and, as reported in one paper, TSH. No study addressed the question of GH deficiency in PHP-Ib patients., Objectives: The objective of the study was to screen patients with clinically diagnosed PHP-Ib for genetic defects and investigate the presence of resistance to TSH and GHRH., Patients/methods: We investigated GNAS differential methylation and STX16 microdeletions in genomic DNA from 10 patients with clinical diagnosis of sporadic PHP-Ib, i.e. PTH resistance without AHO. Resistance to GHRH was assessed by GH response to GHRH plus arginine. Thyroid function and ultrasonography were also evaluated., Results: Molecular analysis showed GNAS cluster imprinting defects in all PHP-Ib patients and the first de novo STX16 deletion in one apparently sporadic patient. Subclinical or clinical hypothyroidism due to resistance to TSH was present in nine of 10 patients, whereas a preserved GH response to a GHRH plus arginine test was present in all patients, with one exception., Conclusions: We report the first molecular analysis of Italian patients with PHP-Ib. Clinical investigation shows that, like PHP-Ia patients, PHP-Ib patients are resistant to TSH, whereas they maintain a normal responsiveness to GHRH, at variance with PHP-Ia patients. These data provide new information on this rare disease and emphasize the clinical heterogeneity of genetic defects within GNAS.

Unlabelled: As hypopituitarism is frequent in patients who have suffered a traumatic brain injury (TBI) a hormonal check-up is necessary. However, the prevalence of TBI is so large that the number of potential candidates to be tested is difficult to manage, in particular for GH deficiency diagnosis that requires cumbersome and expensive dynamic tests. GHRH plus GH-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP-6) is a safe and effective test capable of segregating normal subjects from GH deficient patients. As the GHRH+GHRP-6 test induces GH peaks consistently in the first 30 min, the working hypothesis assessed in this study was whether a single determination of GH 30 min after stimulus could provide the same biochemical classification as the whole secretory curve. A total of 83 subjects who suffered TBI at least one year before the study were administered GHRH 1 mug/kg iv plus GHRP-6 1 mug/kg iv at 0 min, and blood samples were obtained at regular intervals. GH was determined in all samples. An excellent correlation was observed between GH values at 30 min and GH peaks (r=0.972, p<0.0001). When comparing the 30-min GH values against the peaks, the biochemical classification changed only in 5 out of 83 subjects from normal GH secretion to uncertain., Conclusions: The GHRH+GHRP-6 test is convenient, safe and in patients with TBI can be reduced to a single fixed GH determination 30 min after stimulus without losing diagnostic power.

Ectopic acromegaly represents less than 1% of the reported cases of acromegaly. Although clinical improvement is common after treatment with somatostatin (SMS) analogs, the biochemical response and tumor size of the growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH)-producing tumor and its metastases are less predictable. Subject A 36-year-old male was referred because of a 3-year history of acromegaly related symptoms. He had undergone lung surgery in 1987 for a "benign" carcinoid tumor. Endocrine evaluation confirmed acromegaly Plasma IGF-1: 984 ng/ml (63-380), GH: 49.8 ng/ml (<5). MRI showed a large mass in the left cerebellopontine angle and diffuse pituitary hyperplasia. Pulmonary, liver and bone metastases were shown by chest and abdominal CT scans. Ectopic GHRH secretion was suspected. Methods Measurement of circulating GHRH levels by fluorescence immunoassay levels and immunohistochemical study of the primary lung tumor and metastatic tissue with anti-GHRH and anti-somatostatin receptor type 2 (sst2A) antibodies. Results Basal plasma GHRH: 4654 pg/ml (<100). Pathological study of liver and bone biopsy material and lung tissue removed 19 years earlier was consistent with an atypical carcinoid producing GHRH and exhibiting sst2A receptor expression. Treatment with octreotide LAR 20-40 mg q. month resulted in normalization of plasma IGF-1 levels. Circulating GHRH levels decreased dramatically. The size of the left prepontine cistern mass, with SMS receptors shown by a radiolabeled pentetreotide scan, decreased by 80% after 18 months of therapy. Total regression of pituitary enlargement was also observed. No changes were observed in lung and liver metastases. After 24 months of therapy the patient is asymptomatic and living a full and active life.

In thyrotoxicosis GH response to several stimuli is impaired, but there is no data on ghrelin-induced GH release in these patients. Ghrelin is a potent GH secretagogue and it also increases glucose levels in men. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of ghrelin (1 microg/kg), GHRP-6 (1 mug/kg) and GHRH (100 microg), i.v., on GH levels in 10 hyperthyroid patients and in 8 controls. Glucose levels were also measured during ghrelin and GHRP-6 administration. In control subjects and hyperthyroid patients peak GH (microg/l; mean +/- SE) values after ghrelin injection (controls: 66.7 +/- 13.6; hyper: 19.3 +/- 2.4) were significantly higher than those obtained after GHRP-6 (controls: 26.7 +/- 5.1; hyper: 12.6 +/- 1.3) and GHRH (controls: 13.5 +/- 4.3; hyper: 5.3 +/- 1.3). There was a significant decrease in GH responsiveness to ghrelin, GHRP-6 and GHRH in the hyperthyroid group compared to controls. In control subjects and hyperthyroid patients basal glucose (mmol/l) values were 4.5 +/- 0.1 and 4.7 +/- 0.2, respectively. There was a significant increase in glucose levels 30 min after ghrelin injection (controls: 4.9 +/- 0.1; hyper: 5.2 +/- 0.2), which remained elevated up to 120 min. When the two groups were compared no differences in glucose values were observed. GHRP-6 administration was not able to increase glucose levels in both groups. Our data shows that GH release after ghrelin, GHRP-6 and GHRH administration is decreased in thyrotoxicosis. This suggests that thyroid hormone excess interferes with GH-releasing pathways activated by these peptides. Our results also suggest that ghrelin's ability to increase glucose levels is not altered in thyrotoxicosis.

Growth hormone secretion is classically modulated by two hypothalamic hormones, growth hormone-releasing hormone and somatostatin. A third pathway was proposed in the last decade, which involves the growth hormone secretagogues. Ghrelin is a novel acylated peptide which is produced mainly by the stomach. It is also synthesized in the hypothalamus and is present in several other tissues. This endogenous growth hormone secretagogue was discovered by reverse pharmacology when a group of synthetic growth hormone-releasing compounds was initially produced, leading to the isolation of an orphan receptor and, finally, to its endogenous ligand. Ghrelin binds to an active receptor to increase growth hormone release and food intake. It is still not known how hypothalamic and circulating ghrelin is involved in the control of growth hormone release. Endogenous ghrelin might act to amplify the basic pattern of growth hormone secretion, optimizing somatotroph responsiveness to growth hormone-releasing hormone. It may activate multiple interdependent intracellular pathways at the somatotroph, involving protein kinase C, protein kinase A and extracellular calcium systems. However, since ghrelin has a greater ability to release growth hormone in vivo, its main site of action is the hypothalamus. In the current review we summarize the available data on the: a) discovery of this peptide, b) mechanisms of action of growth hormone secretagogues and ghrelin and possible physiological role on growth hormone modulation, and c) regulation of growth hormone release in man after intravenous administration of these peptides.

Context: Some indirect evidence suggests hypothalamic control of GH secretion in acromegaly., Objective: The objective of the study is to examine whether GH secretion in acromegaly is dependent on endogenous GHRH., Patients and Study Design: We studied eight patients with untreated acromegaly due to a GH-producing pituitary tumor. All patients received an iv infusion of normal saline for 24 h and GHRH-antagonist (GHRH-ant) at 50 microg/kg x h for 7 d. GH was measured every 10 min for 24 h during the normal saline infusion and on the last day of the GHRH-ant infusion. A group of nine different patients with untreated acromegaly served as the control group and underwent blood sampling for GH every 10 min for two 24-h periods to assess the day-to-day variability of GH secretion., Setting: The study was set in a university referral center., Main Outcome Measure: Twenty-four-hour mean GH was the main outcome measured., Results: In six of eight subjects treated with GHRH-ant, 24-h mean GH decreased by 5.8-30.0% during iv GHRH-ant and, in three subjects, the change in the 24-h mean GH was greater than the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the spontaneous day-to-day variability of the mean GH in patients with acromegaly. Based on the binomial distribution, the probability of this magnitude of change to occur in three of eight subjects by chance alone is 0.0008., Conclusion: In some patients with acromegaly due to a pituitary adenoma, GH secretion is under partial control by endogenous GHRH.

Context: Therapeutic use of GHRH to enhance GH secretion is limited by its short duration of action., Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetic profile, pharmacodynamic effects, and safety of CJC-1295, a long-acting GHRH analog., Design: The study design was two randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, ascending dose trials with durations of 28 and 49 d., Setting: The study was performed at two investigational sites., Participants: Healthy subjects, ages 21-61 yr, were studied., Interventions: CJC-1295 or placebo was administered sc in one of four ascending single doses in the first study and in two or three weekly or biweekly doses in the second study., Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures were peak concentrations and area under the curve of GH and IGF-I; standard pharmacokinetic parameters were used for CJC-1295., Results: After a single injection of CJC-1295, there were dose-dependent increases in mean plasma GH concentrations by 2- to 10-fold for 6 d or more and in mean plasma IGF-I concentrations by 1.5- to 3-fold for 9-11 d. The estimated half-life of CJC-1295 was 5.8-8.1 d. After multiple CJC-1295 doses, mean IGF-I levels remained above baseline for up to 28 d. No serious adverse reactions were reported., Conclusions: Subcutaneous administration of CJC-1295 resulted in sustained, dose-dependent increases in GH and IGF-I levels in healthy adults and was safe and relatively well tolerated, particularly at doses of 30 or 60 microg/kg. There was evidence of a cumulative effect after multiple doses. These data support the potential utility of CJC-1295 as a therapeutic agent.

Objective: The clinical use of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) is limited by its short half-life. Polyethylene glycol-conjugated GHRH (PEG-GHRH) was developed to provide increased stability compared with the currently available GHRH(1-29). This study aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacodynamics of PEG-GHRH., Design: PEG-GHRH was administered by subcutaneous injection to young healthy men (n = 12) and elderly men and women (aged > 60 years; n = 20)., Results: In both groups, administration of PEG-GHRH generated a clear increase in circulating GH compared with placebo. Following single-dose (0.25, 0.5, 2 or 4 mg) administration to young subjects, the effect persisted for 12 h, but a sustained increase was observed on repeated administration to the elderly. Serum insulin-like growth factor-I also increased in response to PEG-GHRH treatment. Injection-site reactions were more frequent with PEG-GHRH compared with placebo, but these were mild and transient; other adverse events were similar to those observed after placebo. Some impairment of glucose tolerance was observed in the elderly following repeated administration of PEG-GHRH. Antibodies to GHRH were not observed., Conclusions: PEG-GHRH offers the possibility of less frequent dosing compared with GHRH. This possibility deserves further clinical testing.

GHRH is a potentially appealing strategy to simultaneously improve fat distribution and increase bone turnover in HIV-infected patients. We investigated the effects of GHRH (1 mg sc twice a day over 12 wk) in 31 HIV-infected men with abdominal fat accumulation (age 46 +/- 1 yr, body mass index 26.2 +/- 0.6 kg/m2) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. We previously reported significant effects of GHRH on IGF-I and truncal fat. In this study, we assessed whether GHRH increased markers of bone turnover. At baseline, 32% of our subjects (n = 10) demonstrated a bone density Z score less than -1.0 sd and greater than or equal to -2.5 sd, and 3% (n = 1) demonstrated a Z score of less than -2.5 sd. IGF-I correlated with N-terminal telopeptide (NTx) (r = 0.49, P = 0.005) and tended to correlate with C-terminal telopeptide (CTx) (r = 0.35, P = 0.06) at baseline. Of the bone resorption markers, CTx increased significantly (0.16 +/- 0.07 vs. -0.03 +/- 0.03 ng/ml, GHRH vs. placebo, P = 0.02), and NTx tended to increase in response to GHRH (2.8 +/- 1.4 vs. -0.5 +/- 1.0 nm bone collagen equivalent, GHRH vs. placebo, P = 0.07). Of the bone formation markers, N-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen increased (14.6 +/- 9 vs. -6.8 +/- 3.1 microg/liter, GHRH vs. placebo, P = 0.03) and osteocalcin tended to increase (8.4 +/- 3.0 vs. 2.0 +/- 1.6 ng/ml, GHRH vs. placebo, P = 0.06) in response to GHRH. The calciotropic hormones, calcium and phosphorus, did not change significantly. The change in IGF-I correlated with the change in NTx (r = 0.45, P = 0.02), CTx (r = 0.38, P = 0.05), and osteocalcin (r = 0.55, P = 0.002). GHRH improves fat distribution and bone metabolism in men with HIV-related fat accumulation. Long-term studies are needed to determine whether the stimulatory effects of GHRH on bone turnover will translate into increased bone density in this population.

Postulated mechanisms underlying the relative hyposomato-tropism of aging include reduced hypothalamic drive by GHRH. To test this notion, we administered 1 mg (n = 11) vs. 4 mg (n = 11) recombinant human GHRH-1,44-amide s.c. twice daily for 3 months in a double-blind, parallel-cohort design to 22 healthy men (ages, 53-68 yr). After 3 months, GHRH elevated: overnight GH concentrations from 0.71 +/- 0.19 to 1.74 +/- 0.39 microg/liter (P < 0.001; 1 mg) and from 0.80 +/- 0.15 to 5.12 +/- 0.40 microg/liter (P < 0.001; 4 mg) and IGF-I concentrations from 117 +/- 14 to 234 +/- 20 microg/liter (P = 0.007; 1 mg) and from 147 +/- 13 to 286 +/- 22 microg/liter (P < 0.001; 4 mg). Only the higher GHRH dose also increased total body water (tritium space; P = 0.024) and fat-free mass (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; P = 0.021), and reduced total abdominal adiposity (computed axial tomography scan; P = 0.042). Both supplementation schedules shortened the time required to walk 30 m and ascend four flights of stairs (P < 0.025 each). Lower extremity strength, aerobic capacity, and bone mineral density did not change. Local injection site reactions were common. We conclude that sc administration of a large dose of GHRH (4 mg) twice daily for 3 months elevates GH and IGF-I concentrations, increases total body water and fat-free mass, reduces total abdominal adiposity, and enhances certain performance measures in healthy aging men but causes local skin reactions.

The diagnosis and treatment of growth hormone deficiency (GHD), as well as the possibility of counteracting somatopause and age-related changes in body composition, structural functions, and metabolism, prompted interest in potential clinical uses of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and GH secretagogues (GHS). GHD often reflects hypothalamic GHRH deficiency and it has been clearly demonstrated that the age-related decline in the function of the GH/IGF-I axis reflects a reduction in hypothalamic function as evidenced by the preservation of the releasable pool of pituitary GH in aged subjects. The effectiveness of recombinant human GH (rhGH) is well established, but it is also recognized that GH replacement does not mimic physiological GH secretion which theoretically would be restored by GHRH and/or GHS. At present, it has been clearly demonstrated that GHRH and/or GHS represent reliable tools for the diagnosis of GHD. On the other hand, neither GHRH nor GHS has been shown to provide effective alternatives to rhGH for the treatment of GHD. Although GHRH and/or GHS represent the most logical approaches for the restoration of the GH/IGF-I axis to a youthful level of activity and for counteracting the somatopause, this hypothesis has never been proven definitively. Conceptually, GHRH replacement would be the most physiological approach and its safety is guaranteed, provided an appropriate dose is used, in order to avoid hyperactivity of the GH/IGF-I axis. However, a long-acting preparation is needed. On the other hand, GHS, e.g., ghrelin analogues, could be considered as a function of their selectivity of action. However, ghrelin has a wide spectrum of endocrine and non-endocrine actions at both central and peripheral levels. Thus, non-selective GHS, although available in orally active forms, could elicit unforeseen side effects. Previous studies with GHRH and/or GHS in aging patients provided encouraging results. However, it still remains to be definitively demonstrated that aged subjects would benefit from chronic treatment with these molecules.