Search

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents have transformed the treatment landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To expand our understanding of the molecular features underlying response to checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC, we describe here the first joint analysis of the Stand Up To Cancer-Mark Foundation cohort, a resource of whole exome and/or RNA sequencing from 393 patients with NSCLC treated with anti-PD-(L)1 therapy, along with matched clinical response annotation. We identify a number of associations between molecular features and outcome, including (1) favorable (for example, ATM altered) and unfavorable (for example, TERT amplified) genomic subgroups, (2) a prominent association between expression of inducible components of the immunoproteasome and response and (3) a dedifferentiated tumor-intrinsic subtype with enhanced response to checkpoint blockade. Taken together, results from this cohort demonstrate the complexity of biological determinants underlying immunotherapy outcomes and reinforce the discovery potential of integrative analysis within large, well-curated, cancer-specific cohorts.

Recent advances in cancer characterization have consistently revealed marked heterogeneity, impeding the completion of integrated molecular and clinical maps for each malignancy. Here, we focus on chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), a B cell neoplasm with variable natural history which is conventionally categorized into two subtypes distinguished by extent of somatic mutations in the heavy chain variable region of immunoglobulin genes (IGHV). To build the ‘CLL map,’ we integrated genomic, transcriptomic, and epigenomic data from 1148 patients. We identified 202 candidate genetic drivers of CLL (109 novel) and refined the characterization of IGHV subtypes, which revealed distinct genomic landscapes and leukemogenic trajectories. Discovery of new gene expression subtypes further subcategorized this neoplasm and proved to be independent prognostic factors. Clinical outcomes were associated with a combination of genetic, epigenetic, and gene expression features, further advancing our prognostic paradigm. Overall, this work reveals fresh insights into CLL oncogenesis and prognostication.

How the genomic features of a patient’s cancer relate to individual disease kinetics remains poorly understood. Here we used the indolent growth dynamics of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) to analyse the growth rates and corresponding genomic patterns of leukaemia cells from 107 patients with CLL, spanning decades-long disease courses. We found that CLL commonly demonstrates not only exponential expansion but also logistic growth, which is sigmoidal and reaches a certain steady-state level. Each growth pattern was associated with marked differences in genetic composition, the pace of disease progression and the extent of clonal evolution. In a subset of patients, whose serial samples underwent next-generation sequencing, we found that dynamic changes in the disease course of CLL were shaped by the genetic events that were already present in the early slow-growing stages. Finally, by analysing the growth rates of subclones compared with their parental clones, we quantified the growth advantage conferred by putative CLL drivers in vivo. Analysis of growth dynamics in a dataset from 107 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) reveals both exponential and logistic patterns of growth, which are associated with differences in genetic attributes and clinical outcomes.

Clonal hematopoiesis results from somatic mutations in cancer driver genes in hematopoietic stem cells. We sought to identify novel drivers of clonal expansion using an unbiased analysis of sequencing data from 84,683 persons and identified common mutations in the 5-methylcytosine reader, ZBTB33, as well as in YLPM1, SRCAP, and ZNF318. We also identified these mutations at low frequency in myelodysplastic syndrome patients. Zbtb33 edited mouse hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells exhibited a competitive advantage in vivo and increased genome-wide intron retention. ZBTB33 mutations potentially link DNA methylation and RNA splicing, the two most commonly mutated pathways in clonal hematopoiesis and MDS.

Structural variants (SVs), including small insertion and deletion variants (indels), are challenging to detect through standard alignment-based variant calling methods. Sequence assembly offers a powerful approach to identifying SVs, but is difficult to apply at scale genome-wide for SV detection due to its computational complexity and the difficulty of extracting SVs from assembly contigs. We describe SvABA, an efficient and accurate method for detecting SVs from short-read sequencing data using genome-wide local assembly with low memory and computing requirements. We evaluated SvABA's performance on the NA12878 human genome and in simulated and real cancer genomes. SvABA demonstrates superior sensitivity and specificity across a large spectrum of SVs and substantially improves detection performance for variants in the 20–300 bp range, compared with existing methods. SvABA also identifies complex somatic rearrangements with chains of short (

MC3 Working Group: Rehan Akbani21, Pavana Anur22, Matthew H. Bailey1,2,3, Alex Buchanan9, Kami Chiotti9, Kyle Covington12,23, Allison Creason9, Li Ding1,2,3,20, Kyle Ellrott9, Yu Fan21, Steven Foltz1,2, Gad Getz8,14,15,16, Walker Hale12, David Haussler24,25, Julian M. Hess8,26, Carolyn M. Hutter27, Cyriac Kandoth28, Katayoon Kasaian29,30, Melpomeni Kasapi27, Dave Larson1 , Ignaty Leshchiner8, John Letaw31, Singer Ma32, Michael D. McLellan1,3,20, Yifei Men32, Gordon B. Mills33,34, Beifang Niu35, Myron Peto22, Amie Radenbaugh24, Sheila M. Reynolds36, Gordon Saksena8, Heidi Sofia27, Chip Stewart8, Adam J. Struck31, Joshua M. Stuart24,37, Wenyi Wang21, John N. Weinstein38, David A. Wheeler12,13, Christopher K. Wong24,39, Liu Xi12 & Kai Ye40,41 21Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. 22Molecular and Medical Genetics, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. 23Castle Biosciences Inc, Friendswood, TX 77546, USA. 24UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. 25Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. 26Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Cancer Research, Charlestown, MA 02114, USA. 27National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA. 28Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. 29Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON M5G 0A3, Canada. 30Canada’s Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4S6, Canada. 31Computational Biology Program, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. 32DNAnexus Inc, Mountain View, CA 94040, USA. 33Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. 34Precision Oncology, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. 35Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. 36Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. 37Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. 38Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology and Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. 39Biomolecular Engineering Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. 40School of Elect, PCAWG novel somatic mutation calling methods working group: Matthew H. Bailey1,2,3, Beifang Niu35, Matthias Bieg42,43, Paul C. Boutros6,44,45,46, Ivo Buchhalter43,47,48, Adam P. Butler49, Ken Chen50, Zechen Chong51, Li Ding1,2,3,20, Oliver Drechsel52,53, Lewis Jonathan Dursi6,7, Roland Eils47,48,54,55, Kyle Ellrott9, Shadrielle M. G. Espiritu6, Yu Fan21, Robert S. Fulton1,3,20, Shengjie Gao56, Josep L. l. Gelpi57,58, Mark B. Gerstein5,18,19, Gad Getz8,14,15,16, Santiago Gonzalez59,60, Ivo G. Gut52,61, Faraz Hach62,63, Michael C. Heinold47,48, Julian M. Hess8,26, Jonathan Hinton49, Taobo Hu64, Vincent Huang6, Yi Huang65,66, Barbara Hutter43,67,68, David R. Jones49, Jongsun Jung69, Natalie Jäger47, Hyung-Lae Kim70, Kortine Kleinheinz47,48, Sushant Kumar5,19, Yogesh Kumar64, Christopher M. Lalansingh6, Ignaty Leshchiner8, Ivica Letunic71, Dimitri Livitz8, Eric Z. Ma64, Yosef E. Maruvka8,26,72, R. Jay Mashl1,2, Michael D. McLellan1,3,20, Andrew Menzies49, Ana Milovanovic57, Morten Muhlig Nielsen73, Stephan Ossowski52,53,74, Nagarajan Paramasivam43,47, Jakob Skou Pedersen73,75, Marc D. Perry76,77, Montserrat Puiggròs57, Keiran M. Raine49, Esther Rheinbay8,14,72, Romina Royo57, S. Cenk Sahinalp62,78,79, Gordon Saksena8, Iman Sarrafi62,78, Matthias Schlesner47,80, Jared T. Simpson6,17, Lucy Stebbings49, Chip Stewart8, Miranda D. Stobbe52,61, Jon W. Teague49, Grace Tiao8, David Torrents57,81, Jeremiah A. Wala8,14,82, Jiayin Wang1,40,66, Wenyi Wang21, Sebastian M. Waszak60, Joachim Weischenfeldt60,83,84, Michael C. Wendl1,10,11, Johannes Werner47,85, Zhenggang Wu64, Hong Xue64, Sergei Yakneen60, Takafumi N. Yamaguchi6, Kai Ye40,41, Venkata D. Yellapantula20,86, Christina K. Yung76 & Junjun Zhang76, PCAWG Consortium: Lauri A. Aaltonen87, Federico Abascal49, Adam Abeshouse88, Hiroyuki Aburatani89, David J. Adams49, Nishant Agrawal90, Keun Soo Ahn91, Sung-Min Ahn92, Hiroshi Aikata93, Rehan Akbani21, Kadir C. Akdemir50, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie88, Sultan T. Al-Sedairy94, Fatima Al-Shahrour95, Malik Alawi96,97, Monique Albert98, Kenneth Aldape99,100, Ludmil B. Alexandrov49,101,102, Adrian Ally30, Kathryn Alsop103, Eva G. Alvarez104,105,106, Fernanda Amary107, Samirkumar B. Amin108,109,110, Brice Aminou76, Ole Ammerpohl111,112, Matthew J. Anderson113, Yeng Ang114, Davide Antonello115, Pavana Anur22, Samuel Aparicio116, Elizabeth L. Appelbaum1,117, Yasuhito Arai118, Axel Aretz119, Koji Arihiro93, Shun-ichi Ariizumi120, Joshua Armenia121, Laurent Arnould122, Sylvia Asa123,124, Yassen Assenov125, Gurnit Atwal6,126,127, Sietse Aukema112,128, J. Todd Auman129, Miriam R. Aure130, Philip Awadalla6,126, Marta Aymerich131, Gary D. Bader126, Adrian Baez-Ortega132, Matthew H. Bailey1,2,3, Peter J. Bailey133, Miruna Balasundaram30, Saianand Balu134, Pratiti Bandopadhayay8,135,136, Rosamonde E. Banks137, Stefano Barbi138, Andrew P. Barbour139,140, Jonathan Barenboim6, Jill Barnholtz-Sloan141,142, Hugh Barr143, Elisabet Barrera59, John Bartlett98,144, Javier Bartolome57, Claudio Bassi115, Oliver F. Bathe145,146, Daniel Baumhoer147, Prashant Bavi148, Stephen B. Baylin149,150, Wojciech Bazant59, Duncan Beardsmore151, Timothy A. Beck152,153, Sam Behjati49, Andreas Behren154, Beifang Niu35, Cindy Bell155, Sergi Beltran52,61, Christopher Benz156, Andrew Berchuck157, Anke K. Bergmann158, Erik N. Bergstrom101,102, Benjamin P. Berman159,160,161, Daniel M. Berney162, Stephan H. Bernhart163,164,165, Rameen Beroukhim8,14,82, Mario Berrios166, Samantha Bersani167, Johanna Bertl73,168, Miguel Betancourt169, Vinayak Bhandari6,44, Shriram G. Bhosle49, Andrew V. Biankin133,170,171,172, Matthias Bieg42,43, Darell Bigner173, Hans Binder163,164, Ewan Birney59, Michael Birrer72, Nidhan K. Biswas174, Bodil Bjerkehagen147,175, Tom Bodenheimer134, Lori Boice176, Giada Bonizzato177, Johann S. De Bono178, Arnoud Boot179,180, Moiz S. Bootwalla166, Ake Borg181, Arndt Borkhardt182, Keith A. Boroevich183,184, Ivan Borozan6, Christoph Borst185, Marcus Bosenberg186, Mattia Bosio52,53,57, Jacqueline Boultwood187, Guillaume Bourque188,189, Paul C. Boutros6,44,45,46, G. Steven Bova190, David T. Bowen49,191, Reanne Bowlby30, David D. L. Bowtell103, Sandrine Boyault192, Rich Boyce59, Jeffrey Boyd193, Alvis Brazma59, Paul Brennan194, Daniel S. Brewer195,196, Arie B. Brinkman197, Robert G. Bristow44,198,199,200,201, Russell R. Broaddus99, Jane E. Brock202, Malcolm Brock203, Annegien Broeks204, Angela N. Brooks8,24,37,82, Denise Brooks30, Benedikt Brors67,205,206, Søren Brunak207,208, Timothy J. C. Bruxner113,209, Alicia L. Bruzos104,105,106, Alex Buchanan9, Ivo Buchhalter43,47,48, Christiane Buchholz210, Susan Bullman8,82, Hazel Burke211, Birgit Burkhardt212, Kathleen H. Burns213,214, John Busanovich8,215, Carlos D. Bustamante216,217, Adam P. Butler49, Atul J. Butte218, Niall J. Byrne76, Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale130,219, Samantha J. Caesar-Johnson220, Andy Cafferkey59, Declan Cahill221, Claudia Calabrese59,60, Carlos Caldas222,223, Fabien Calvo224, Niedzica Camacho178, Peter J. Campbell49,225, Elias Campo226,227, Cinzia Cantù177, Shaolong Cao21, Thomas E. Carey228, Joana Carlevaro-Fita229,230,231, Rebecca Carlsen30, Ivana Cataldo167,177, Mario Cazzola232, Jonathan Cebon154, Robert Cerfolio233, Dianne E. Chadwick234, Dimple Chakravarty235, Don Chalmers236, Calvin Wing Yiu Chan47,237, Kin Chan238, Michelle Chan-Seng-Yue148, Vishal S. Chandan239, David K. Chang133,170, Stephen J. Chanock240, Lorraine A. Chantrill170,241, Aurélien Chateigner76,242, Nilanjan Chatterjee149,243, Kazuaki Chayama93, Hsiao-Wei Chen114,121, Jieming Chen218, Ken Chen50, Yiwen Chen21, Zhaohong Chen244, Andrew D. Cherniack8,82, Jeremy Chien245, Yoke-Eng Chiew246,247, Suet-Feung Chin222,223, Juok Cho8, Sunghoon Cho248, Jung Kyoon Choi249, Wan Choi250, Christine Chomienne251, Zechen Chong51, Su Pin Choo252, Angela Chou170,246, Angelika N. Christ113, Elizabeth L. Christie103, Eric Chuah30, Carrie Cibulskis8, Kristian Cibulskis8, Sara Cingarlini253, Peter Clapham49, Alexander Claviez254, Sean Cleary148,255, Nicole Cloonan256, Marek Cmero257,258,259, Colin C. Collins62, Ashton A. Connor255,260, Susanna L. Cooke133, Colin S. Cooper178,196,261, Leslie Cope149, Vincenzo Corbo138,177, Matthew G. Cordes1,262, Stephen M. Cordner263, Isidro Cortés-Ciriano264,265,266, Kyle Covington12,23, Prue A. Cowin267, Brian Craft24, David Craft8,268, Chad J. Creighton269, Yupeng Cun270, Erin Curley271, Ioana Cutcutache179,180, Karolina Czajka272, Bogdan Czerniak99,273, Rebecca A. Dagg274, Ludmila Danilova149, Maria Vittoria Davi275, Natalie R. Davidson276,277,278,279,280, Helen Davies49,281,282, Ian J. Davis283, Brandi N. Davis-Dusenbery284, Kevin J. Dawson49, Francisco M. De La Vega216,217,285, Ricardo De Paoli-Iseppi211, Timothy Defreitas8, Angelo P. Dei Tos286, Olivier Delaneau287,288,289, John A. Demchok220, Jonas Demeulemeester290,291, German M. Demidov52,53,74, Deniz Demircioğlu292,293, Nening M. Dennis221, Robert E. Denroche148, Stefan C. Dentro49,290,294, Nikita Desai76, Vikram Deshpande72, Amit G. Deshwar295, Christine Desmedt296,297, Jordi Deu-Pons298,299, Noreen Dhalla30, Neesha C. Dhani300, Priyanka Dhingra301,302, Rajiv Dhir303, Anthony DiBiase304, Klev Diamanti305, Li Ding1,2,3,20, Shuai Ding306, Huy Q. Dinh159, Luc Dirix307, HarshaVardhan Doddapaneni12, Nilgun Donmez62,78, Michelle T. Dow244, Ronny Drapkin308, Oliver Drechsel52,53, Ruben M. Drews223, Serge Serge49, Tim Dudderidge150,221, Ana Dueso-Barroso57, Andrew J. Dunford8, Michael Dunn309, Lewis Jonathan Dursi6,7, Fraser R. Duthie133,310, Ken Dutton-Regester311, Jenna Eagles272, Douglas F. Easton312,313, Stuart Edmonds314, Paul A. Edwards223,315, Sandra E. Edwards178, Rosalind A. Eeles178,221, Anna Ehinger316, Juergen Eils54,55, Roland Eils47,48,54,55, Adel El-Naggar99,273, Matthew Eldridge223, Kyle Ellrott9, Serap Erkek60, Georgia Escaramis53,317,318, Shadrielle M. G. Espiritu6, Xavier Estivill53,319, Dariush Etemadmoghadam103, Jorunn E. Eyfjord320, Bishoy M. Faltas280, Daiming Fan321, Yu Fan21, William C. Faquin72, Claudiu Farcas244, Matteo Fassan322, Aquila Fatima323, Francesco Favero324, Nodirjon Fayzullaev76, Ina Felau220, Sian Fereday103, Martin L. Ferguson325, Vincent Ferretti76,326, Lars Feuerbach205, Matthew A. Field327, J. Lynn Fink57,113, Gaetano Finocchiaro328, Cyril Fisher221, Matthew W. Fittall290, Anna Fitzgerald329, Rebecca C. Fitzgerald282, Adrienne M. Flanagan330, Neil E. Fleshner331, Paul Flicek59, John A. Foekens332, Kwun M. Fong333, Nuno A. Fonseca59,334, Christopher S. Foster335,336, Natalie S. Fox6, Michael Fraser6, Scott Frazer8, Milana Frenkel-Morgenstern337, William Friedman338, Joan Frigola298, Catrina C. Fronick1,262, Akihiro Fujimoto184, Masashi Fujita184, Masashi Fukayama339, Lucinda A. Fulton1 , Robert S. Fulton1,3,20, Mayuko Furuta184, P. Andrew Futreal340, Anja Füllgrabe59, Stacey B. Gabriel8, Steven Gallinger148,255,260, Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini341, Jianjiong Gao121, Shengjie Gao56, Levi Garraway82, Øystein Garred342, Erik Garrison49, Dale W. Garsed103, Nils Gehlenborg8,343, Josep L. l. Gelpi57,58, Joshy George110, Daniela S. Gerhard344, Clarissa Gerhauser345, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald346,347, Mark B. Gerstein5,18,19, Moritz Gerstung59,60, Gad Getz8,14,15,16, Mohammed Ghori49, Ronald Ghossein348, Nasra H. Giama349, Richard A. Gibbs12, Anthony J. Gill170,350, Pelvender Gill351, Dilip D. Giri348, Dominik Glodzik49, Vincent J. Gnanapragasam352,353, Maria Elisabeth Goebler354, Mary J. Goldman24, Carmen Gomez355, Santiago Gonzalez59,60, Abel Gonzalez-Perez298,299,356, Dmitry A. Gordenin357, James Gossage358, Kunihito Gotoh359, Ramaswamy Govindan3, Dorthe Grabau360, Janet S. Graham133,361, Robert C. Grant148,260, Anthony R. Green315, Eric Green27, Liliana Greger59, Nicola Grehan282, Sonia Grimaldi177, Sean M. Grimmond362, Robert L. Grossman363, Adam Grundhoff97,364, Gunes Gundem88, Qianyun Guo75, Manaswi Gupta8, Shailja Gupta365, Ivo G. Gut52,61, Marta Gut52,61, Jonathan Göke292,366, Gavin Ha8, Andrea Haake111, David Haan37, Siegfried Haas185, Kerstin Haase290, James E. Haber367, Nina Habermann60, Faraz Hach62,63, Syed Haider6, Natsuko Hama118, Freddie C. Hamdy351, Anne Hamilton267, Mark P. Hamilton368, Leng Han369, George B. Hanna370, Martin Hansmann371, Nicholas J. Haradhvala8,72, Olivier Harismendy102,372, Ivon Harliwong113, Arif O. Harmanci5,373, Eoghan Harrington374, Takanori Hasegawa375, David Haussler24,25, Steve Hawkins223, Shinya Hayami376, Shuto Hayashi375, D. Neil Hayes134,377,378, Stephen J. Hayes379,380, Nicholas K. Hayward211,311, Steven Hazell221, Yao He381, Allison P. Heath382, Simon C. Heath52,61, David Hedley300, Apurva M. Hegde38, David I. Heiman8, Michael C. Heinold47,48, Zachary Heins88, Lawrence E. Heisler152, Eva Hellstrom-Lindberg383, Mohamed Helmy384, Seong Gu Heo385, Austin J. Hepperla134, José María Heredia-Genestar386, Carl Herrmann47,48,387, Peter Hersey211, Julian M. Hess8,26, Holmfridur Hilmarsdottir320, Jonathan Hinton49, Satoshi Hirano388, Nobuyoshi Hiraoka389, Katherine A. Hoadley134,390, Asger Hobolth75,168, Ermin Hodzic78, Jessica I. Hoell182, Steve Hoffmann163,164,165,391, Oliver Hofmann392, Andrea Holbrook166, Aliaksei Z. Holik53, Michael A. Hollingsworth393, Oliver Holmes209,311, Robert A. Holt30, Chen Hong205,237, Eun Pyo Hong385, Jongwhi H. Hong394, Gerrit K. Hooijer395, Henrik Hornshøj73, Fumie Hosoda118, Yong Hou56,396, Volker Hovestadt397, William Howat352, Alan P. Hoyle134, Ralph H. Hruban149, Jianhong Hu12, Taobo Hu64, Xing Hua240, Kuan-lin Huang1,398, Mei Huang176, Mi Ni Huang179,180, Vincent Huang6, Yi Huang65,66, Wolfgang Huber60, Thomas J. Hudson272,399, Michael Hummel400, Jillian A. Hung246,247, David Huntsman401, Ted R. Hupp402, Jason Huse88, Matthew R. Huska403, Barbara Hutter43,67,68, Carolyn M. Hutter27, Daniel Hübschmann48,54,404,405,406, Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue348, Charles David Imbusch205, Marcin Imielinski407,408, Seiya Imoto375, William B. Isaacs409, Keren Isaev6,44, Shumpei Ishikawa410, Murat Iskar397, S. M. Ashiqul Islam244, Michael Ittmann411,412,413, Sinisa Ivkovic284, Jose M. G. Izarzugaza414, Jocelyne Jacquemier415, Valerie Jakrot211, Nigel B. Jamieson133,172,416, Gun Ho Jang148, Se Jin Jang417, Joy C. Jayaseelan12, Reyka Jayasinghe1 , Stuart R. Jefferys134, Karine Jegalian418, Jennifer L. Jennings419, Seung-Hyup Jeon250, Lara Jerman60,420, Yuan Ji421,422, Wei Jiao6, Peter A. Johansson311, Amber L. Johns170, Jeremy Johns272, Rory Johnson230,423, Todd A. Johnson183, Clemency Jolly290, Yann Joly424, Jon G. Jonasson320, Corbin D. Jones425, David R. Jones49, David T. W. Jones426,427, Nic Jones428, Steven J. M. Jones30, Jos Jonkers204, Young Seok Ju49,249, Hartmut Juhl429, Jongsun Jung69, Malene Juul73, Randi Istrup Juul73, Sissel Juul374, Natalie Jäger47, Rolf Kabbe47, Andre Kahles276,277,278,279,430, Abdullah Kahraman431,432,433, Vera B. Kaiser434, Hojabr Kakavand211, Sangeetha Kalimuthu148, Christof von Kalle405, Koo Jeong Kang91, Katalin Karaszi351, Beth Karlan435, Rosa Karlić436, Dennis Karsch437, Katayoon Kasaian29,30, Karin S. Kassahn113,438, Hitoshi Katai439, Mamoru Kato440, Hiroto Katoh410, Yoshiiku Kawakami93, Jonathan D. Kay117, Stephen H. Kazakoff209,311, Marat D. Kazanov441,442,443, Maria Keays59, Electron Kebebew444,445, Richard F. Kefford446, Manolis Kellis8,447, James G. Kench170,350,448, Catherine J. Kennedy246,247, Jules N. A. Kerssemakers47, David Khoo273, Vincent Khoo221, Narong Khuntikeo115,449, Ekta Khurana301,302,450,451, Helena Kilpinen117, Hark Kyun Kim452, Hyung-Lae Kim70, Hyung-Yong Kim415, Hyunghwan Kim250, Jaegil Kim8, Jihoon Kim453, Jong K. Kim454, Youngwook Kim455,456, Tari A. King457,458,459, Wolfram Klapper128, Kortine Kleinheinz47,48, Leszek J. Klimczak460, Stian Knappskog49,461, Michael Kneba437, Bartha M. Knoppers424, Youngil Koh462,463, Jan Komorowski305,464, Daisuke Komura410, Mitsuhiro Komura375, Gu Kong415, Marcel Kool426,465, Jan O. Korbel59,60, Viktoriya Korchina12, Andrey Korshunov465, Michael Koscher465, Roelof Koster466, Zsofia Kote-Jarai178, Antonios Koures244, Milena Kovacevic284, Barbara Kremeyer49, Helene Kretzmer164,165, Markus Kreuz467, Savitri Krishnamurthy99,468, Dieter Kube469, Kiran Kumar8, Pardeep Kumar221, Sushant Kumar5,19, Yogesh Kumar64, Ritika Kundra114,121, Kirsten Kübler8,14,72, Ralf Küppers470, Jesper Lagergren383,471, Phillip H. Lai166, Peter W. Laird472, Sunil R. Lakhani473, Christopher M. Lalansingh6, Emilie Lalonde6, Fabien C. Lamaze6, Adam Lambert351, Eric Lander8, Pablo Landgraf474,475, Luca Landoni115, Anita Langerød130, Andrés Lanzós230,231,423, Denis Larsimont476, Erik Larsson477, Mark Lathrop189, Loretta M. S. Lau478, Chris Lawerenz55, Rita T. Lawlor177, Michael S. Lawrence8,72,183, Alexander J. Lazar99,108, Xuan Le479, Darlene Lee30, Donghoon Lee5, Eunjung Alice Lee480, Hee Jin Lee417, Jake June-Koo Lee264,266, Jeong-Yeon Lee481, Juhee Lee482, Ming Ta Michael Lee340, Henry Lee-Six49, Kjong-Van Lehmann276,277,278,279,430, Hans Lehrach483, Dido Lenze400, Conrad R. Leonard209,311, Daniel A. Leongamornlert49,178, Ignaty Leshchiner8, Louis Letourneau484, Ivica Letunic71, Douglas A. Levine88,485, Lora Lewis12, Tim Ley486, Chang Li56,396, Constance H. Li6,44, Haiyan Irene Li30, Jun Li21, Lin Li56, Shantao Li5, Siliang Li56,396, Xiaobo Li56,396, Xiaotong Li5, Xinyue Li56, Yilong Li49, Han Liang21, Sheng-Ben Liang234, Peter Lichter68,397, Pei Lin8, Ziao Lin8,487, W. M. Linehan488, Ole Christian Lingjærde489, Dongbing Liu56,396, Eric Minwei Liu88,301,302, Fei-Fei Liu201,490, Fenglin Liu381,491, Jia Liu492, Xingmin Liu56,396, Julie Livingstone6, Dimitri Livitz8, Naomi Livni221, Lucas Lochovsky5,19,110, Markus Loeffler467, Georgina V. Long211, Armando Lopez-Guillermo493, Shaoke Lou5,19, David N. Louis72, Laurence B. Lovat117, Yiling Lu38, Yong-Jie Lu162,494, Youyong Lu495,496,497, Claudio Luchini167, Ilinca Lungu144,148, Xuemei Luo152, Hayley J. Luxton117, Andy G. Lynch223,315,498, Lisa Lype36, Cristina López111,112, Carlos López-Otín499, Eric Z. Ma64, Yussanne Ma30, Gaetan MacGrogan500, Shona MacRae501, Geoff Macintyre223, Tobias Madsen73, Kazuhiro Maejima184, Andrea Mafficini177, Dennis T. Maglinte166,502, Arindam Maitra174, Partha P. Majumder174, Luca Malcovati232, Salem Malikic62,78, Giuseppe Malleo115, Graham J. Mann211,246,503, Luisa Mantovani-Löffler504, Kathleen Marchal505,506, Giovanni Marchegiani115, Elaine R. Mardis1,193,507, Adam A. Margolin31, Maximillian G. Marin37, Florian Markowetz223,315, Julia Markowski403, Jeffrey Marks508, Tomas Marques-Bonet61,81,386,509, Marco A. Marra30, Luke Marsden351, John W. M. Martens332, Sancha Martin49,510, Jose I. Martin-Subero81,511, Iñigo Martincorena49, Alexander Martinez-Fundichely301,302,451 Yosef E. Maruvka8,26,72, R. Jay Mashl1,2, Charlie E. Massie223, Thomas J. Matthew37, Lucy Matthews178, Erik Mayer221,512, Simon Mayes513, Michael Mayo30, Faridah Mbabaali272, Karen McCune514, Ultan McDermott49, Patrick D. McGillivray19, Michael D. McLellan1,3,20, John D. McPherson148,272,515, John R. McPherson179,180, Treasa A. McPherson260, Samuel R. Meier8, Alice Meng516, Shaowu Meng134, Andrew Menzies49, Neil D. Merrett115,517, Sue Merson178, Matthew Meyerson8,14,82, William U. Meyerson4,5, Piotr A. Mieczkowski518, George L. Mihaiescu76, Sanja Mijalkovic284, Ana Mijalkovic Mijalkovic-Lazic284, Tom Mikkelsen519, Michele Milella253, Linda Mileshkin103, Christopher A. Miller1 , David K. Miller113,170, Jessica K. Miller272, Gordon B. Mills33,34, Ana Milovanovic57, Sarah Minner520, Marco Miotto115, Gisela Mir Arnau267, Lisa Mirabello240, Chris Mitchell103, Thomas J. Mitchell49,315,352, Satoru Miyano375, Naoki Miyoshi375, Shinichi Mizuno521, Fruzsina Molnár-Gábor522, Malcolm J. Moore300, Richard A. Moore30, Sandro Morganella49, Quaid D. Morris127,490, Carl Morrison523,524, Lisle E. Mose134, Catherine D. Moser349, Ferran Muiños298,299, Loris Mularoni298,299, Andrew J. Mungall30, Karen Mungall30, Elizabeth A. Musgrove133, Ville Mustonen525,526,527, David Mutch528, Francesc Muyas52,53,74, Donna M. Muzny12, Alfonso Muñoz59, Jerome Myers529, Ola Myklebost461, Peter Möller530, Genta Nagae89, Adnan M. Nagrial170, Hardeep K. Nahal-Bose76, Hitoshi Nakagama531, Hidewaki Nakagawa184, Hiromi Nakamura118, Toru Nakamura388, Kaoru Nakano184, Tannistha Nandi532, Jyoti Nangalia49, Mia Nastic284, Arcadi Navarro61,81,386, Fabio C. P. Navarro19, David E. Neal223,352, Gerd Nettekoven533, Felicity Newell209,311, Steven J. Newhouse59, Yulia Newton37, Alvin Wei Tian Ng534, Anthony Ng535, Jonathan Nicholson49, David Nicol221, Yongzhan Nie321,536, G. Petur Nielsen72, Morten Muhlig Nielsen73, Serena Nik-Zainal49,281,282,537, Michael S. Noble8, Katia Nones209,311, Paul A. Northcott538, Faiyaz Notta148,539, Brian D. O’Connor76,540, Peter O’Donnell541, Maria O’Donovan282, Sarah O’Meara49, Brian Patrick O’Neill542, J. Robert O’Neill543, David Ocana59, Angelica Ochoa88, Layla Oesper544, Christopher Ogden221, Hideki Ohdan93, Kazuhiro Ohi375, Lucila Ohno-Machado244, Karin A. Oien523,545, Akinyemi I. Ojesina546,547,548, Hidenori Ojima549, Takuji Okusaka550, Larsson Omberg551, Choon Kiat Ong552, Stephan Ossowski52,53,74, German Ott553, B. F. Francis Ouellette76,554, Christine P’ng6, Marta Paczkowska6, Salvatore Paiella115, Chawalit Pairojkul523, Marina Pajic170, Qiang Pan-Hammarström56,555, Elli Papaemmanuil49, Irene Papatheodorou59, Nagarajan Paramasivam43,47, Ji Wan Park385, Joong-Won Park556, Keunchil Park557,558, Kiejung Park559, Peter J. Park264,266, Joel S. Parker518, Simon L. Parsons124, Harvey Pass560, Danielle Pasternack272, Alessandro Pastore276, Ann-Marie Patch209,311, Iris Pauporté251, Antonio Pea115, John V. Pearson209,311, Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu8,14,82, Jakob Skou Pedersen73,75, Paolo Pederzoli115, Martin Peifer270, Nathan A. Pennell561, Charles M. Perou129,518, Marc D. Perry76,77, Gloria M. Petersen562, Myron Peto22, Nicholas Petrelli563, Robert Petryszak59, Stefan M. Pfister426,465,564, Mark Phillips424, Oriol Pich298,299, Hilda A. Pickett478, Todd D. Pihl565, Nischalan Pillay566, Sarah Pinder567, Mark Pinese170, Andreia V. Pinho568, Esa Pitkänen60, Xavier Pivot569, Elena Piñeiro-Yáñez95, Laura Planko533, Christoph Plass345, Paz Polak8,14,15, Tirso Pons570, Irinel Popescu571, Olga Potapova572, Aparna Prasad52, Shaun R. Preston573, Manuel Prinz47, Antonia L. Pritchard311, Stephenie D. Prokopec6, Elena Provenzano574, Xose S. Puente499, Sonia Puig176, Montserrat Puiggròs57, Sergio Pulido-Tamayo505,506, Gulietta M. Pupo246, Colin A. Purdie575, Michael C. Quinn209,311, Raquel Rabionet52,53,576, Janet S. Rader577, Bernhard Radlwimmer397, Petar Radovic284, Benjamin Raeder60, Keiran M. Raine49, Manasa Ramakrishna49, Kamna Ramakrishnan49, Suresh Ramalingam578, Benjamin J. Raphael579, W. Kimryn Rathmell580, Tobias Rausch60, Guido Reifenberger475, Jüri Reimand6,44, Jorge Reis-Filho348, Victor Reuter348, Iker Reyes-Salazar298, Matthew A. Reyna579, Sheila M. Reynolds36, Esther Rheinbay8,14,72, Yasser Riazalhosseini189, Andrea L. Richardson323, Julia Richter111,128, Matthew Ringel581, Markus Ringnér181, Yasushi Rino582, Karsten Rippe405, Jeffrey Roach583, Lewis R. Roberts349, Nicola D. Roberts49, Steven A. Roberts584, A. Gordon Robertson30, Alan J. Robertson113, Javier Bartolomé Rodriguez57, Bernardo Rodriguez-Martin104,105,106, F. Germán Rodríguez-González83,332, Michael H. A. Roehrl44,123,148,234,585,586, Marius Rohde587, Hirofumi Rokutan440, Gilles Romieu588, Ilse Rooman170, Tom Roques262, Daniel Rosebrock8, Mara Rosenberg8,72, Philip C. Rosenstiel589, Andreas Rosenwald590, Edward W. Rowe221,591, Romina Royo57, Steven G. Rozen179,180,592, Yulia Rubanova17,127, Mark A. Rubin423,593,594,595,596, Carlota Rubio-Perez298,299,597, Vasilisa A. Rudneva60, Borislav C. Rusev177, Andrea Ruzzenente598, Gunnar Rätsch276,277,278,279,280,430, Radhakrishnan Sabarinathan298,299,599, Veronica Y. Sabelnykova6, Sara Sadeghi30, S. Cenk Sahinalp62,78,79, Natalie Saini357, Mihoko Saito-Adachi440, Gordon Saksena8, Adriana Salcedo6, Roberto Salgado600, Leonidas Salichos5,19, Richard Sallari8, Charles Saller601, Roberto Salvia115, Michelle Sam272, Jaswinder S. Samra115,602, Francisco Sanchez-Vega114,121, Chris Sander276,603,604, Grant Sanders134, Rajiv Sarin605, Iman Sarrafi62,78, Aya Sasaki-Oku184, Torill Sauer489, Guido Sauter520, Robyn P. M. Saw211, Maria Scardoni167, Christopher J. Scarlett170,606, Aldo Scarpa177, Ghislaine Scelo194, Dirk Schadendorf68,607, Jacqueline E. Schein30, Markus B. Schilhabel589, Matthias Schlesner47,80, Thorsten Schlomm84,608, Heather K. Schmidt1 , Sarah-Jane Schramm246, Stefan Schreiber609, Nikolaus Schultz121, Steven E. Schumacher8,323, Roland F. Schwarz59,403,405,610, Richard A. Scolyer211,448,602, David Scott428, Ralph Scully611, Raja Seethala612, Ayellet V. Segre8,613, Iris Selander260, Colin A. Semple434, Yasin Senbabaoglu276, Subhajit Sengupta614, Elisabetta Sereni115, Stefano Serra585, Dennis C. Sgroi72, Mark Shackleton103, Nimish C. Shah352, Sagedeh Shahabi234, Catherine A. Shang329, Ping Shang211, Ofer Shapira8,323, Troy Shelton271, Ciyue Shen603,604, Hui Shen615, Rebecca Shepherd49, Ruian Shi490, Yan Shi134, Yu-Jia Shiah6, Tatsuhiro Shibata118,616, Juliann Shih8,82, Eigo Shimizu375, Kiyo Shimizu617, Seung Jun Shin618, Yuichi Shiraishi375, Tal Shmaya285, Ilya Shmulevich36, Solomon I. Shorser6, Charles Short59, Raunak Shrestha62, Suyash S. Shringarpure217, Craig Shriver619, Shimin Shuai6,126, Nikos Sidiropoulos83, Reiner Siebert112,620, Anieta M. Sieuwerts332, Lina Sieverling205,237, Sabina Signoretti202,621, Katarzyna O. Sikora177, Michele Simbolo138, Ronald Simon520, Janae V. Simons134, Jared T. Simpson6,17, Peter T. Simpson473, Samuel Singer115,458, Nasa Sinnott-Armstrong8,217, Payal Sipahimalani30, Tara J. Skelly390, Marcel Smid332, Jaclyn Smith622, Karen Smith-McCune514, Nicholas D. Socci276, Heidi J. Sofia27, Matthew G. Soloway134, Lei Song240, Anil K. Sood623,624,625, Sharmila Sothi626, Christos Sotiriou244, Cameron M. Soulette37, Paul N. Span627, Paul T. Spellman22, Nicola Sperandio177, Andrew J. Spillane211, Oliver Spiro8, Jonathan Spring628, Johan Staaf181, Peter F. Stadler163,164,165, Peter Staib629, Stefan G. Stark277,279,618,630, Lucy Stebbings49, Ólafur Andri Stefánsson631, Oliver Stegle59,60,632, Lincoln D. Stein6,126, Alasdair Stenhouse633, Chip Stewart8, Stephan Stilgenbauer634, Miranda D. Stobbe52,61, Michael R. Stratton49, Jonathan R. Stretch211, Adam J. Struck31, Joshua M. Stuart24,37, Henk G. Stunnenberg396,635, Hong Su56,396, Xiaoping Su99, Ren X. Sun6, Stephanie Sungalee60, Hana Susak52,53, Akihiro Suzuki89,636, Fred Sweep637, Monika Szczepanowski128, Holger Sültmann67,638, Takashi Yugawa617, Angela Tam30, David Tamborero298,299, Benita Kiat Tee Tan639, Donghui Tan518, Patrick Tan180,532,592,640, Hiroko Tanaka375, Hirokazu Taniguchi616, Tomas J. Tanskanen641, Maxime Tarabichi49,290, Roy Tarnuzzer220, Patrick Tarpey642, Morgan L. Taschuk152, Kenji Tatsuno89, Simon Tavaré223,643, Darrin F. Taylor113, Amaro Taylor-Weiner8, Jon W. Teague49, Bin Tean Teh180,592,640,644,645, Varsha Tembe246, Javier Temes104,105, Kevin Thai76, Sarah P. Thayer393, Nina Thiessen30, Gilles Thomas646, Sarah Thomas221, Alan Thompson221, Alastair M. Thompson633, John F. Thompson211, R. Houston Thompson647, Heather Thorne103, Leigh B. Thorne176, Adrian Thorogood424, Grace Tiao8, Nebojsa Tijanic284, Lee E. Timms272, Roberto Tirabosco648, Marta Tojo106, Stefania Tommasi649, Christopher W. Toon170, Umut H. Toprak48,650, David Torrents57,81, Giampaolo Tortora651,652, Jörg Tost653, Yasushi Totoki118, David Townend654, Nadia Traficante103, Isabelle Treilleux655,656, Jean-Rémi Trotta61, Lorenz H. P. Trümper469, Ming Tsao124,539, Tatsuhiko Tsunoda183,657,658,659, Jose M. C. Tubio104,105,106, Olga Tucker660, Richard Turkington661, Daniel J. Turner513, Andrew Tutt323, Masaki Ueno376, Naoto T. Ueno662, Christopher Umbricht151,213,663, Husen M. Umer305,664, Timothy J. Underwood665, Lara Urban59,60, Tomoko Urushidate616, Tetsuo Ushiku339, Liis Uusküla-Reimand666,667, Alfonso Valencia57,81, David J. Van Den Berg166, Steven Van Laere307, Peter Van Loo290,291, Erwin G. Van Meir668, Gert G. Van den Eynden307, Theodorus Van der Kwast123, Naveen Vasudev137, Miguel Vazquez57,669, Ravikiran Vedururu267, Umadevi Veluvolu518, Shankar Vembu490,670, Lieven P. C. Verbeke506,671, Peter Vermeulen307, Clare Verrill351,672, Alain Viari177, David Vicente57, Caterina Vicentini177, K. Vijay Raghavan365, Juris Viksna673, Ricardo E. Vilain674, Izar Villasante57, Anne Vincent-Salomon635, Tapio Visakorpi190, Douglas Voet8, Paresh Vyas311,351, Ignacio Vázquez-García49,86,675,676, Nick M. Waddell209, Nicola Waddell209,311, Claes Wadelius677, Lina Wadi6, Rabea Wagener111,112, Jeremiah A. Wala8,14,82, Jian Wang56, Jiayin Wang1,40,66, Linghua Wang12, Qi Wang465, Wenyi Wang21, Yumeng Wang21, Zhining Wang220, Paul M. Waring523, Hans-Jörg Warnatz483, Jonathan Warrell5,19, Anne Y. Warren352,678, Sebastian M. Waszak60, David C. Wedge49,294,679, Dieter Weichenhan345, Paul Weinberger680, John N. Weinstein38, Joachim Weischenfeldt60,83,84, Daniel J. Weisenberger166, Ian Welch681, Michael C. Wendl1,10,11, Johannes Werner47,85, Justin P. Whalley61,682, David A. Wheeler12,13, Hayley C. Whitaker117, Dennis Wigle683, Matthew D. Wilkerson518, Ashley Williams244, James S. Wilmott211, Gavin W. Wilson6,148, Julie M. Wilson148, Richard K. Wilson1,684, Boris Winterhoff685, Jeffrey A. Wintersinger17,127,384, Maciej Wiznerowicz686,687, Stephan Wolf688, Bernice H. Wong689, Tina Wong1,30, Winghing Wong690, Youngchoon Woo250, Scott Wood209,311, Bradly G. Wouters44, Adam J. Wright6, Derek W. Wright133,691, Mark H. Wright217, Chin-Lee Wu72, Dai-Ying Wu285, Guanming Wu692, Jianmin Wu170, Kui Wu56,396, Yang Wu179,180, Zhenggang Wu64, Liu Xi12, Tian Xia693, Qian Xiang76, Xiao Xiao66, Rui Xing497, Heng Xiong56,396, Qinying Xu209,311, Yanxun Xu694, Hong Xue64, Shinichi Yachida118,695, Sergei Yakneen60, Rui Yamaguchi375, Takafumi N. Yamaguchi6, Masakazu Yamamoto120, Shogo Yamamoto89, Hiroki Yamaue376, Fan Yang490, Huanming Yang56, Jean Y. Yang696, Liming Yang220, Lixing Yang697, Shanlin Yang306, Tsun-Po Yang270, Yang Yang369, Xiaotong Yao408,698, Marie-Laure Yaspo483, Lucy Yates49, Christina Yau156, Chen Ye56,396, Kai Ye40,41, Venkata D. Yellapantula20,86, Christopher J. Yoon249, Sung-Soo Yoon463, Fouad Yousif6, Jun Yu699, Kaixian Yu700, Willie Yu701, Yingyan Yu702, Ke Yuan223,510,703, Yuan Yuan21, Denis Yuen6, Takashi Yugawa617, Christina K. Yung76, Olga Zaikova704, Jorge Zamora49,104,105,106, Marc Zapatka397, Jean C. Zenklusen220, Thorsten Zenz67, Nikolajs Zeps705,706, Cheng-Zhong Zhang8,707, Fan Zhang381, Hailei Zhang8, Hongwei Zhang494, Hongxin Zhang121, Jiashan Zhang220, Jing Zhang5, Junjun Zhang76, Xiuqing Zhang56, Xuanping Zhang66,369, Yan Zhang5,708,709, Zemin Zhang381,710, Zhongming Zhao711, Liangtao Zheng381, Xiuqing Zheng381, Wanding Zhou615, Yong Zhou56, Bin Zhu240, Hongtu Zhu700,712, Jingchun Zhu24, Shida Zhu56,396, Lihua Zou713, Xueqing Zou49, Anna deFazio246,247,714, Nicholas van As221, Carolien H. M. van Deurzen715, Marc J. van de Vijver523, L. van’t Veer716 & Christian von Mering433,717, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) curated consensus somatic mutation calls using whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS), respectively. Here, as part of the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium, which aggregated whole genome sequencing data from 2,658 cancers across 38 tumour types, we compare WES and WGS side-by-side from 746 TCGA samples, finding that ~80% of mutations overlap in covered exonic regions. We estimate that low variant allele fraction (VAF < 15%) and clonal heterogeneity contribute up to 68% of private WGS mutations and 71% of private WES mutations. We observe that ~30% of private WGS mutations trace to mutations identified by a single variant caller in WES consensus efforts. WGS captures both ~50% more variation in exonic regions and un-observed mutations in loci with variable GC-content. Together, our analysis highlights technological divergences between two reproducible somatic variant detection efforts.

Somatic mosaicism in normal tissues Somatic cells can accumulate mutations over the course of an individual's lifetime. This generates cells that differ genetically at specific loci within the genome. To explore how this genetic diversity in individuals contributes to disease, Yizhak et al. developed a method to detect mutations from RNA sequencing data (see the Perspective by Tomasetti). Applying this method to Cancer Genome Atlas samples and normal samples from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project generated a tissue-specific study of mutation accumulation. Somatic mutations were detected in nearly all individuals and across many normal human tissues in genomic regions called cancer hotspots and in genes that play a role in cancer. Interestingly, the skin, lung, and esophagus exhibited the most mutations, suggesting that the environment generates many human mutations. Science , this issue p. eaaw0726 ; see also p. 938

Primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs) and primary testicular lymphomas (PTLs) are extranodal large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs) with inferior responses to current empiric treatment regimens. To identify targetable genetic features of PCNSL and PTL, we characterized their recurrent somatic mutations, chromosomal rearrangements, copy number alterations (CNAs), and associated driver genes, and compared these comprehensive genetic signatures to those of diffuse LBCL and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBL). These studies identify unique combinations of genetic alterations in discrete LBCL subtypes and subtype-selective bases for targeted therapy. PCNSLs and PTLs frequently exhibit genomic instability, and near-uniform, often biallelic, CDKN2A loss with rare TP53 mutations. PCNSLs and PTLs also use multiple genetic mechanisms to target key genes and pathways and exhibit near-uniform oncogenic Toll-like receptor signaling as a result of MYD88 mutation and/or NFKBIZ amplification, frequent concurrent B-cell receptor pathway activation, and deregulation of BCL6. Of great interest, PCNSLs and PTLs also have frequent 9p24.1/PD-L1/PD-L2 CNAs and additional translocations of these loci, structural bases of immune evasion that are shared with PMBL.

Cancer genome studies have significantly advanced our knowledge of somatic mutations. However, how these mutations accumulate in normal cells and whether they promote pre-cancerous lesions remains poorly understood. Here we perform a comprehensive analysis of normal tissues by utilizing RNA sequencing data from ∼6,700 samples across 29 normal tissues collected as part of the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. We identify somatic mutations using a newly developed pipeline, RNA-MuTect, for calling somatic mutations directly from RNA-seq samples and their matched-normal DNA. When applied to the GTEx dataset, we detect multiple variants across different tissues and find that mutation burden is associated with both the age of the individual and tissue proliferation rate. We also detect hotspot cancer mutations that share tissue specificity with their matched cancer type. This study is the first to analyze a large number of samples across multiple normal tissues, identifying clones with genomic aberrations observed in cancer.

Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) of childhood with a poor prognosis. Mutations in NF1, NRAS, KRAS, PTPN11 and CBL occur in 85% of patients, yet there are currently no risk stratification algorithms capable of predicting which patients will be refractory to conventional treatment and therefore be candidates for experimental therapies. In addition, there have been few other molecular pathways identified aside from the Ras/MAPK pathway to serve as the basis for such novel therapeutic strategies. We therefore sought to genomically characterize serial samples from patients at diagnosis through relapse and transformation to acute myeloid leukemia in order to expand our knowledge of the mutational spectrum in JMML. We identified recurrent mutations in genes involved in signal transduction, gene splicing, the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) and transcription. Importantly, the number of somatic alterations present at diagnosis appears to be the major determinant of outcome.

The goal of the 1000 Genomes Consortium is to characterize human genome structural variation (SV), including forms of copy number variations such as deletions, duplications, and insertions. Mobile element insertions, particularly Alu elements, are major contributors to genomic SV among humans. During the pilot phase of the project we experimentally validated 645 (611 intergenic and 34 exon targeted) polymorphic "young" Alu insertion events, absent from the human reference genome. Here, we report high resolution sequencing of 343 (322 unique) recent Alu insertion events, along with their respective target site duplications, precise genomic breakpoint coordinates, subfamily assignment, percent divergence, and estimated A-rich tail lengths. All the sequenced Alu loci were derived from the AluY lineage with no evidence of retrotransposition activity involving older Alu families (e.g., AluJ and AluS). AluYa5 is currently the most active Alu subfamily in the human lineage, followed by AluYb8, and many others including three newly identified subfamilies we have termed AluYb7a3, AluYb8b1, and AluYa4a1. This report provides the structural details of 322 unique Alu variants from individual human genomes collectively adding about 100 kb of genomic variation. Many Alu subfamilies are currently active in human populations, including a surprising level of AluY retrotransposition. Human Alu subfamilies exhibit continuous evolution with potential drivers sprouting new Alu lineages.

Cancer cells can acquire profound alterations to the structure of their genomes, including rearrangements that fuse distant DNA breakpoints. We analyze the distribution of somatic rearrangements across the cancer genome, using whole-genome sequencing data from 2,693 tumor-normal pairs. We observe substantial variation in the density of rearrangement breakpoints, with enrichment in open chromatin and sites with high densities of repetitive elements. After accounting for these patterns, we identify significantly recurrent breakpoints (SRBs) at 52 loci, including novel SRBs near BRD4 and AKR1C3. Taking into account both loci fused by a rearrangement, we observe different signatures resembling either single breaks followed by strand invasion or two separate breaks that become joined. Accounting for these signatures, we identify 90 pairs of loci that are significantly recurrently juxtaposed (SRJs). SRJs are primarily tumor-type specific and tend to involve genes with tissue-specific expression. SRJs were frequently associated with disruption of topology-associated domains, juxtaposition of enhancer elements, and increased expression of neighboring genes. Lastly, we find that the power to detect SRJs decreases for short rearrangements, and that reliable detection of all driver SRJs will require whole-genome sequencing data from an order of magnitude more cancer samples than currently available.

Genomic analysis of tumours has led to the identification of hundreds of cancer genes on the basis of the presence of mutations in protein-coding regions. By contrast, much less is known about cancer-causing mutations in non-coding regions. Here we perform deep sequencing in 360 primary breast cancers and develop computational methods to identify significantly mutated promoters. Clear signals are found in the promoters of three genes. FOXA1, a known driver of hormone-receptor positive breast cancer, harbours a mutational hotspot in its promoter leading to overexpression through increased E2F binding. RMRP and NEAT1, two non-coding RNA genes, carry mutations that affect protein binding to their promoters and alter expression levels. Our study shows that promoter regions harbour recurrent mutations in cancer with functional consequences and that the mutations occur at similar frequencies as in coding regions. Power analyses indicate that more such regions remain to be discovered through deep sequencing of adequately sized cohorts of patients.

Structural variants (SVs), including small insertion and deletion variants (indels), are challenging to detect through standard alignment-based variant calling methods. Sequence assembly offers a powerful approach to identifying SVs, but is difficult to apply at-scale genome-wide for SV detection due to its computational complexity and the difficulty of extracting SVs from assembly contigs. We describe SvABA, an efficient and accurate method for detecting SVs from short-read sequencing data using genome-wide local assembly with low memory and computing requirements. We evaluated SvABA’s performance on the NA12878 human genome and in simulated and real cancer genomes. SvABA demonstrates superior sensitivity and specificity across a large spectrum of SVs, and substantially improved detection performance for variants in the 20-300 bp range, compared with existing methods. SvABA also identifies complex somatic rearrangements with chains of short (< 1,000 bp) templated-sequence insertions copied from distant genomic regions. We applied SvABA to 344 cancer genomes from 11 cancer types, and found that templated-sequence insertions occur in ~4% of all somatic rearrangements. Finally, we demonstrate that SvABA can identify sites of viral integration and cancer driver alterations containing medium-sized SVs.

Retrotransposons constitute a major source of genetic variation, and somatic retrotransposon insertions have been reported in cancer. Here, we applied TranspoSeq, a computational framework that identifies retrotransposon insertions from sequencing data, to whole genomes from 200 tumor/normal pairs across 11 tumor types as part of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Pan-Cancer Project. In addition to novel germline polymorphisms, we find 810 somatic retrotransposon insertions primarily in lung squamous, head and neck, colorectal, and endometrial carcinomas. Many somatic retrotransposon insertions occur in known cancer genes. We find that high somatic retrotransposition rates in tumors are associated with high rates of genomic rearrangement and somatic mutation. Finally, we developed TranspoSeq-Exome to interrogate an additional 767 tumor samples with hybrid-capture exome data and discovered 35 novel somatic retrotransposon insertions into exonic regions, including an insertion into an exon of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene. The results of this large-scale, comprehensive analysis of retrotransposon movement across tumor types suggest that somatic retrotransposon insertions may represent an important class of structural variation in cancer., National Cancer Institute (U.S.) (grant U24CA143867), National Cancer Institute (U.S.) (grant U24CA126546)

Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is a highly lethal, smoking-associated cancer with few known targetable genetic alterations. Using genome sequencing, we characterized the somatic evolution of a genetically engineered mouse model (GEMM) of SCLC initiated by loss of Trp53 and Rb1. We identified alterations in DNA copy number and complex genomic rearrangements and demonstrated a low somatic point mutation frequency in the absence of tobacco mutagens. Alterations targeting the tumor suppressor Pten occurred in the majority of murine SCLC studied, and engineered Pten deletion accelerated murine SCLC and abrogated loss of Chr19 in Trp53; Rb1; Pten compound mutant tumors. Finally, we found evidence for polyclonal and sequential metastatic spread of murine SCLC by comparative sequencing of families of related primary tumors and metastases. We propose a temporal model of SCLC tumorigenesis with implications for human SCLC therapeutics and the nature of cancer-genome evolution in GEMMs, National Cancer Institute (U.S.) (K08CA160658)

Craniopharyngiomas are epithelial tumors that typically arise in the suprasellar region of the brain. Patients experience substantial clinical sequelae from both extension of the tumors and therapeutic interventions that damage the optic chiasm, the pituitary stalk and the hypothalamic area. Using whole-exome sequencing, we identified mutations in CTNNB1 (β-catenin) in nearly all adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas examined (11/12, 92%) and recurrent mutations in BRAF (resulting in p.Val600Glu) in all papillary craniopharyngiomas (3/3, 100%). Targeted genotyping revealed BRAF p.Val600Glu in 95% of papillary craniopharyngiomas (36 of 39 tumors) and mutation of CTNNB1 in 96% of adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas (51 of 53 tumors). The CTNNB1 and BRAF mutations were clonal in each tumor subtype, and we detected no other recurrent mutations or genomic aberrations in either subtype. Adamantinomatous and papillary craniopharyngiomas harbor mutations that are mutually exclusive and clonal. These findings have important implications for the diagnosis and treatment of these neoplasms.

Cervical cancer is responsible for 10-15% of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. The aetiological role of infection with high-risk human papilloma viruses (HPVs) in cervical carcinomas is well established. Previous studies have also implicated somatic mutations in PIK3CA, PTEN, TP53, STK11 and KRAS as well as several copy-number alterations in the pathogenesis of cervical carcinomas. Here we report whole-exome sequencing analysis of 115 cervical carcinoma-normal paired samples, transcriptome sequencing of 79 cases and whole-genome sequencing of 14 tumour-normal pairs. Previously unknown somatic mutations in 79 primary squamous cell carcinomas include recurrent E322K substitutions in the MAPK1 gene (8%), inactivating mutations in the HLA-B gene (9%), and mutations in EP300 (16%), FBXW7 (15%), NFE2L2 (4%), TP53 (5%) and ERBB2 (6%). We also observe somatic ELF3 (13%) and CBFB (8%) mutations in 24 adenocarcinomas. Squamous cell carcinomas have higher frequencies of somatic nucleotide substitutions occurring at cytosines preceded by thymines (Tp*C sites) than adenocarcinomas. Gene expression levels at HPV integration sites were statistically significantly higher in tumours with HPV integration compared with expression of the same genes in tumours without viral integration at the same site. These data demonstrate several recurrent genomic alterations in cervical carcinomas that suggest new strategies to combat this disease.

Major international projects are underway that are aimed at creating a comprehensive catalogue of all the genes responsible for the initiation and progression of cancer. These studies involve the sequencing of matched tumour-normal samples followed by mathematical analysis to identify those genes in which mutations occur more frequently than expected by random chance. Here we describe a fundamental problem with cancer genome studies: as the sample size increases, the list of putatively significant genes produced by current analytical methods burgeons into the hundreds. The list includes many implausible genes (such as those encoding olfactory receptors and the muscle protein titin), suggesting extensive false-positive findings that overshadow true driver events. We show that this problem stems largely from mutational heterogeneity and provide a novel analytical methodology, MutSigCV, for resolving the problem. We apply MutSigCV to exome sequences from 3,083 tumour-normal pairs and discover extraordinary variation in mutation frequency and spectrum within cancer types, which sheds light on mutational processes and disease aetiology, and in mutation frequency across the genome, which is strongly correlated with DNA replication timing and also with transcriptional activity. By incorporating mutational heterogeneity into the analyses, MutSigCV is able to eliminate most of the apparent artefactual findings and enable the identification of genes truly associated with cancer.

The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has risen 600% over the last 30 years. With a 5-year survival rate of ~15%, the identification of new therapeutic targets for EAC is greatly important. We analyze the mutation spectra from whole-exome sequencing of 149 EAC tumor-normal pairs, 15 of which have also been subjected to whole-genome sequencing. We identify a mutational signature defined by a high prevalence of A>C transversions at AA dinucleotides. Statistical analysis of exome data identified 26 significantly mutated genes. Of these genes, five (TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4, ARID1A and PIK3CA) have previously been implicated in EAC. The new significantly mutated genes include chromatin-modifying factors and candidate contributors SPG20, TLR4, ELMO1 and DOCK2. Functional analyses of EAC-derived mutations in ELMO1 identifies increased cellular invasion. Therefore, we suggest the potential activation of the RAC1 pathway as a contributor to EAC tumorigenesis., National Human Genome Research Institute (U.S.) (Large Scale Sequencing Program Grant U54 HG003067)

Neuroblastoma is a malignancy of the developing sympathetic nervous system that often presents with widespread metastatic disease, resulting in survival rates of less than 50%. To determine the spectrum of somatic mutation in high-risk neuroblastoma, we studied 240 affected individuals (cases) using a combination of whole-exome, genome and transcriptome sequencing as part of the Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET) initiative. Here we report a low median exonic mutation frequency of 0.60 per Mb (0.48 nonsilent) and notably few recurrently mutated genes in these tumors. Genes with significant somatic mutation frequencies included ALK (9.2% of cases), PTPN11 (2.9%), ATRX (2.5%, and an additional 7.1% had focal deletions), MYCN (1.7%, causing a recurrent p.Pro44Leu alteration) and NRAS (0.83%). Rare, potentially pathogenic germline variants were significantly enriched in ALK, CHEK2, PINK1 and BARD1. The relative paucity of recurrent somatic mutations in neuroblastoma challenges current therapeutic strategies that rely on frequently altered oncogenic drivers., National Human Genome Research Institute (U.S.) (Grant U54HG003067), National Cancer Institute (U.S.) (Contract HHSN261200800001E)

Resistance to the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib has been attributed solely to mutations in BTK and related pathway molecules. Using whole-exome and deep-targeted sequencing, we dissect evolution of ibrutinib resistance in serial samples from five chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients. In two patients, we detect BTK-C481S mutation or multiple PLCG2 mutations. The other three patients exhibit an expansion of clones harbouring del(8p) with additional driver mutations (EP300, MLL2 and EIF2A), with one patient developing trans-differentiation into CD19-negative histiocytic sarcoma. Using droplet-microfluidic technology and growth kinetic analyses, we demonstrate the presence of ibrutinib-resistant subclones and estimate subclone size before treatment initiation. Haploinsufficiency of TRAIL-R, a consequence of del(8p), results in TRAIL insensitivity, which may contribute to ibrutinib resistance. These findings demonstrate that the ibrutinib therapy favours selection and expansion of rare subclones already present before ibrutinib treatment, and provide insight into the heterogeneity of genetic changes associated with ibrutinib resistance., University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (Support Grant CA016672), National Science Foundation (U.S.) (DMR-1310266), Harvard University. Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (DMR-1420570), National Natural Science Foundation (China) (81372496)

Whole-genome sequencing using massively parallel sequencing technologies enables accurate detection of somatic rearrangements in cancer. Pinpointing large numbers of rearrangement breakpoints to base-pair resolution allows analysis of rearrangement microhomology and genomic location for every sample. Here we analyze 95 tumor genome sequences from breast, head and neck, colorectal, and prostate carcinomas, and from melanoma, multiple myeloma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. We discover three genomic factors that are significantly correlated with the distribution of rearrangements: replication time, transcription rate, and GC content. The correlation is complex, and different patterns are observed between tumor types, within tumor types, and even between different types of rearrangements. Mutations in the APC gene correlate with and, hence, potentially contribute to DNA breakage in late-replicating, low %GC, untranscribed regions of the genome. We show that somatic rearrangements display less microhomology than germline rearrangements, and that breakpoint loci are correlated with local hypermutability with a particular enrichment for transversions.

Barrett's esophagus is thought to progress to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) through a stepwise progression with loss of CDKN2A followed by TP53 inactivation and aneuploidy. Here we present whole-exome sequencing from 25 pairs of EAC and Barrett's esophagus and from 5 patients whose Barrett's esophagus and tumor were extensively sampled. Our analysis showed that oncogene amplification typically occurred as a late event and that TP53 mutations often occurred early in Barrett's esophagus progression, including in non-dysplastic epithelium. Reanalysis of additional EAC exome data showed that the majority (62.5%) of EACs emerged following genome doubling and that tumors with genomic doubling had different patterns of genomic alterations, with more frequent oncogenic amplification and less frequent inactivation of tumor suppressors, including CDKN2A. These data suggest that many EACs emerge not through the gradual accumulation of tumor-suppressor alterations but rather through a more direct path whereby a TP53-mutant cell undergoes genome doubling, followed by the acquisition of oncogenic amplifications., National Human Genome Research Institute (U.S.) Large-Scale Sequencing Program (Grant U54 HG0003067)

Lymphoma is the most common hematological malignancy in developed countries. Outcome is strongly determined by molecular subtype, reflecting a need for new and improved treatment options. Dogs spontaneously develop lymphoma, and the predisposition of certain breeds indicates genetic risk factors. Using the dog breed structure, we selected three lymphoma predisposed breeds developing primarily T-cell (boxer), primarily B-cell (cocker spaniel), and with equal distribution of B- and T-cell lymphoma (golden retriever), respectively. We investigated the somatic mutations in B- and T-cell lymphomas from these breeds by exome sequencing of tumor and normal pairs. Strong similarities were evident between B-cell lymphomas from golden retrievers and cocker spaniels, with recurrent mutations in TRAF3-MAP3K14 (28% of all cases), FBXW7 (25%), and POT1 (17%). The FBXW7 mutations recurrently occur in a specific codon; the corresponding codon is recurrently mutated in human cancer. In contrast, T-cell lymphomas from the predisposed breeds, boxers and golden retrievers, show little overlap in their mutation pattern, sharing only one of their 15 most recurrently mutated genes. Boxers, which develop aggressive T-cell lymphomas, are typically mutated in the PTEN-mTOR pathway. T-cell lymphomas in golden retrievers are often less aggressive, and their tumors typically showed mutations in genes involved in cellular metabolism. We identify genes with known involvement in human lymphoma and leukemia, genes implicated in other human cancers, as well as novel genes that could allow new therapeutic options.

Cancer genome studies have significantly contributed to the discovery of somatic mutations and processes that drive cancer. However, how these mutations accumulate in normal cells and contribute to early cancer development remains poorly understood. Recent studies have addressed this question by studying normal blood and a small number of skin samples, discovering both driver mutations as well as mutational processes observed in cancer. Here we extend these studies by analyzing RNA from ~7,000 samples across 30 normal tissues from ~600 individuals compared to their germline DNA, collected as part of the GTEx project. To accomplish this goal we first developed a new pipeline termed RNA-MuTect for calling somatic mutations directly from RNA-seq samples and their matched-normal DNA. RNA-MuTect includes multiple filtering steps designed specifically for analyzing RNA-seq. We first validated RNA-MuTect by analyzing TCGA samples where both DNA and RNA data are available. Comparing the set of mutations detected by RNA-MuTect to those identified in the DNA, we show that whenever there is sufficient coverage to detect the mutations in RNA, we have a high sensitivity. Most importantly, RNA-MuTect has a very low false-positive rate with specificity >90%. We further demonstrate that we can discover most of the known driver genes in this cohort using the mutations detected based on the RNA data. Moreover, using the RNA data, we can detect the same mutational processes as identified in the DNA, including UV, aging, smoking and others. To study clonal expansion in normal tissues and investigate whether known cancer-related genes and processes can be identified, we applied RNA-MuTect to the GTEx dataset. As expected, multiple variants were detected across tissues, with skin, lung and esophagus having the highest number of somatic mutations. Overall, different cancer-related events were detected. Specifically: (1) we found 15 hotspot mutations in 6 different genes including TP53, KRAS and PIK3CA; (2) Mutated genes in 8 different tissues were found to be enriched with Cancer Gene Census genes; (3) Known cancer genes were found to be under positive selection in different tissues; (4) Known cancer-related mutational signatures were captured in normal tissues; (5) Cases of allelic imbalance were detected in various tissues. This study is the first to analyze a large number of samples across many tissues to explore the fundamental question of cancer initiation. Many cancer-related processes and events are discovered across different tissues, laying the foundation for studying the earliest stages of cancer development. Note: This abstract was not presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Keren Yizhak, Jaegil Kim, Francois Aguet, Julian Hess, Hailei Zhang, Eila Arich-Landkof, Noam Shoresh, Ayelet Segre, Chip Stewart, Dainel Rosebrock, Dimitri Livitz, Nicholas Haradhvala, Paz Polak, Tim Sullivan, Xiao Li, Kristin Ardlie, Gad Getz. Identifying cancer-related processes in normal tissues via RNA-seq [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-231. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-LB-231

Pediatric Ewing sarcoma is characterized by the expression of chimeric fusions of EWS and ETS family transcription factors, representing a paradigm for studying cancers driven by transcription factor rearrangements. In this study, we describe the somatic landscape of pediatric Ewing sarcoma. These tumors are among the most genetically normal cancers characterized to date, with only EWS–ETS rearrangements identified in the majority of tumors. STAG2 loss, however, is present in more than 15% of Ewing sarcoma tumors; occurs by point mutation, rearrangement, and likely nongenetic mechanisms; and is associated with disease dissemination. Perhaps the most striking finding is the paucity of mutations in immediately targetable signal transduction pathways, highlighting the need for new therapeutic approaches to target EWS–ETS fusions in this disease. Significance: We performed next-generation sequencing of Ewing sarcoma, a pediatric cancer involving bone, characterized by expression of EWS–ETS fusions. We found remarkably few mutations. However, we discovered that loss of STAG2 expression occurs in 15% of tumors and is associated with metastatic disease, suggesting a potential genetic vulnerability in Ewing sarcoma. Cancer Discov; 4(11); 1326–41. ©2014 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1243

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network has profiled and analyzed large numbers of human tumors to discover molecular aberrations at the DNA, RNA, protein and epigenetic levels. The resulting rich data provide a major opportunity to develop an integrated picture of commonalities, differences and emergent themes across tumor lineages. The Pan-Cancer initiative compares the first 12 tumor types profiled by TCGA. Analysis of the molecular aberrations and their functional roles across tumor types will teach us how to extend therapies effective in one cancer type to others with a similar genomic profile., National Cancer Institute (U.S.), National Human Genome Research Institute (U.S.)

Cancer is principally considered a genetic disease, and numerous mutations are thought essential to drive its growth. However, the existence of genomically stable cancers and the emergence of mutations in genes that encode chromatin remodelers raise the possibility that perturbation of chromatin structure and epigenetic regulation are capable of driving cancer formation. Here we sequenced the exomes of 35 rhabdoid tumors, highly aggressive cancers of early childhood characterized by biallelic loss of SMARCB1, a subunit of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. We identified an extremely low rate of mutation, with loss of SMARCB1 being essentially the sole recurrent event. Indeed, in 2 of the cancers there were no other identified mutations. Our results demonstrate that high mutation rates are dispensable for the genesis of cancers driven by mutation of a chromatin remodeling complex. Consequently, cancer can be a remarkably genetically simple disease.

Background The evolution of gene expression is a challenging problem in evolutionary biology, for which accurate, well-calibrated measurements and methods are crucial. Results We quantified gene expression with whole-transcriptome sequencing in four diploid, prototrophic strains of Saccharomyces species grown under the same condition to investigate the evolution of gene expression. We found that variation in expression is gene-dependent with large variations in each gene's expression between replicates of the same species. This confounds the identification of genes differentially expressed across species. To address this, we developed a statistical approach to establish significance bounds for inter-species differential expression in RNA-Seq data based on the variance measured across biological replicates. This metric estimates the combined effects of technical and environmental variance, as well as Poisson sampling noise by isolating each component. Despite a paucity of large expression changes, we found a strong correlation between the variance of gene expression change and species divergence (R2 = 0.90). Conclusion We provide an improved methodology for measuring gene expression changes in evolutionary diverged species using RNA Seq, where experimental artifacts can mimic evolutionary effects. GEO Accession Number: GSE32679

Summary Genomic structural variants (SVs) are abundant in humans, differing from other variation classes in extent, origin, and functional impact. Despite progress in SV characterization, the nucleotide resolution architecture of most SVs remains unknown. We constructed a map of unbalanced SVs (i.e., copy number variants) based on whole genome DNA sequencing data from 185 human genomes, integrating evidence from complementary SV discovery approaches with extensive experimental validations. Our map encompassed 22,025 deletions and 6,000 additional SVs, including insertions and tandem duplications. Most SVs (53%) were mapped to nucleotide resolution, which facilitated analyzing their origin and functional impact. We examined numerous whole and partial gene deletions with a genotyping approach and observed a depletion of gene disruptions amongst high frequency deletions. Furthermore, we observed differences in the size spectra of SVs originating from distinct formation mechanisms, and constructed a map constructed a map of SV hotspots formed by common mechanisms. Our analytical framework and SV map serves as a resource for sequencing-based association studies.

As a consequence of the accumulation of insertion events over evolutionary time, mobile elements now comprise nearly half of the human genome. The Alu, L1, and SVA mobile element families are still duplicating, generating variation between individual genomes. Mobile element insertions (MEI) have been identified as causes for genetic diseases, including hemophilia, neurofibromatosis, and various cancers. Here we present a comprehensive map of 7,380 MEI polymorphisms from the 1000 Genomes Project whole-genome sequencing data of 185 samples in three major populations detected with two detection methods. This catalog enables us to systematically study mutation rates, population segregation, genomic distribution, and functional properties of MEI polymorphisms and to compare MEI to SNP variation from the same individuals. Population allele frequencies of MEI and SNPs are described, broadly, by the same neutral ancestral processes despite vastly different mutation mechanisms and rates, except in coding regions where MEI are virtually absent, presumably due to strong negative selection. A direct comparison of MEI and SNP diversity levels suggests a differential mobile element insertion rate among populations., Author Summary We embarked on this study to explore the 1000 Genomes Project (1000GP) pilot dataset as a substrate for Mobile Element Insertion (MEI) discovery and analysis. MEI is already well known as a significant component of genetic variation in the human population. However the full extent and effects of MEI can only be assessed by accurate detection in large whole-genome sequencing efforts such as the 1000GP. In this study we identified 7,380 distinct genomic locations of variant MEI and carried out rigorous validation experiments that confirmed the high accuracy of the detected events. We were able to measure the frequency of each variant in three continental population groups and found that inherited MEI variants propagate through populations in much the same way as single nucleotide polymorphisms, except that MEI are more strongly suppressed in protein coding parts of the genome. We also found evidence that the MEI mutation rate has not been constant over human population history, rather that different populations appear to have different characteristic MEI mutation rates.

Nat. Genet. 47, 1326–1333 (2015); published online 12 October 2015; corrected after print 7 December 2015 In the version of this article initially published, two patients were stated on page 5 to have been excluded owing to insufficient follow-up data. These patients were included in the final analysis, but two additional patients were excluded owing to the presence of Noonan syndrome.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a genetically heterogeneous disease characterized by multiple low-frequency alterations including somatic mutations, copy number alterations (CNAs) and chromosomal rearrangements. We sought to identify previously unrecognized low-frequency genetic events, integrate recurrent alterations into comprehensive signatures and associate these signatures with clinical parameters. For these reasons, our multi-institutional international group assembled a cohort of 304 primary DLBCLs from newly diagnosed patients, 87% of whom were uniformly treated with state-of-the-art therapy (rituximab-containing CHOP regimen) and had long term followup. Tumors were subjected to whole exome sequencing with an extended bait set that included custom probes designed to capture recurrent chromosomal rearrangements. In this cohort, 47% of samples had available transcriptional profiling and assignment to associated disease subtypes. Analytical pipelines developed at the Broad Institute were used to detect mutations (MuTect), CNAs (Recapseq+Allelic Capseq) and chromosomal rearrangements (dRanger+Breakpointer) and assess clonality (Absolute). To analyze formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumors without paired normals we developed a method which utilized 8334 unrelated normal samples to stringently filter recurrent germline events and artifacts. Significant mutational drivers were identified using the MutSig2CV algorithm and recurrent CNAs were assessed with GISTIC2.0. In addition, we utilized a recently developed algorithm, CLUMPS2, to prioritize somatic mutations which cluster in 3-dimensional protein structure. With this approach, we identified > 90 recurrently mutated genes, 34 focal amplifications and 41 focal deletions, 20 arm-level events and > 200 chromosomal rearrangements in the DLBCL series. Of note, 33% of the mutational drivers were also perturbed by chromosomal rearrangements or CNAs, underscoring the importance of a comprehensive genetic analysis. In the large DLBCL series, we identified several previously unrecognized but potentially targetable alterations including mutations in NOTCH2 (8%) and TET2 (5%). The majority of identified chromosomal rearrangements involved translocations of potent regulatory regions to intact gene coding sequences. The most frequently rearrangements involved Ig regulatory elements which were translocated to BCL2, MYC, BCL6 and several additional genes with known roles in germinal center B-cell biology. After identifying recurrent somatic mutations, CNAs and chromosomal rearrangements, we performed hierarchical clustering and identified subsets of DLBCLs with comprehensive signatures comprised of specific alterations. A large subset of tumors shared recurrent alterations previously associated with follicular lymphoma including mutations of chromatin modifiers such as CREBBP, MLL2, and EZH2 in association with alterations of TNFRSF14 and GNA13 and translocations of BCL2. This cluster was enriched in GCB-type DLBCLs and contained a subset with select genetic alterations associated with an unfavorable outcome. An additional cohort of tumors was characterized by alterations perturbing B-cell differentiation including recurrent BCL6 translocations or alterations of PRDM1. A subset of these DLBCLs had alterations of NOTCH2 and additional pathway components or mutations of MYD88 in association with TNFAIP3, CD70 and EBF1, a master regulator of B-cell differentiation. An additional group of DLBCLs exhibited frequent MYD88 mutations in association with alterations of CD79B, PIM1, TBL1XR1 and ETV6 and BCL2 copy gain; these tumors were highly enriched for ABC-type DLBCLs. This coordinate signature and additional alterations of p53 pathway components were associated with outcome. We explored bases for the identified genetic alterations in DLBCL by performing an in silico mutational signature analysis. The most frequent mutational signatures were those of spontaneous deamination (aging) and AID with rare cases of microsatellite instability. We also assessed the clonality of identified genetic features to define cancer cell fraction and establish the timing of specific genetic events. The comprehensive genetic signatures of clinically annotated DLBCLs provide new insights regarding approaches to targeted therapy. Disclosures Link: Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rodig:Perkin Elmer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding. Pfreundschuh:Boehringer Ingelheim, Celegene, Roche, Spectrum: Other: Advisory board; Roche: Honoraria; Amgen, Roche, Spectrum: Research Funding. Shipp:Gilead: Consultancy; Sanofi: Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Unbiased high-throughput massively parallel sequencing methods have transformed the process of discovery of novel putative driver gene mutations in cancer. In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), these methods have yielded several unexpected findings, including the driver genes SF3B1, NOTCH1 and POT1. Recent analysis, utilizing down-sampling of existing datasets, has shown that the discovery process of putative drivers is far from complete across cancer. In CLL, while driver gene mutations affecting >10% of patients were efficiently discovered with previously published CLL cohorts of up to 160 samples subjected to whole exome sequencing (WES), this sample size has only 0.78 power to detect drivers affecting 5% of patients, and only 0.12 power for drivers affecting 2% of patients. These calculations emphasize the need to apply unbiased WES to larger patient cohorts. To this end, we performed a combined analysis of CLL WES data joining together our previously published cohort of 159 CLLs with data from 103 CLLs collected by the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC). The raw sequencing reads from these 262 primary tumor samples (102 CLL with unmutated IGHV, 147 with mutated IGHV, 13 with unknown IGHV status) were processed together and aligned to the hg19 reference genome. Somatic single nucleotide variations (sSNVs) and indels were detected using MuTect. Subsequently, inference of recurrently mutated genes was performed using the MutSig algorithm. This method combined several characteristics such as the overall mutation rate per sample, the gene specific background mutation rate, non-synonymous/synonymous ratio and mutation clustering to detect genes that are affected by mutations more than expected by chance. This analysis identified 40 recurrently mutated genes in this cohort. This included 22 of 25 previously identified recurrently mutated genes in CLL. In addition, 18 novel candidate CLL drivers were identified, mostly affecting 1-2% of patients. The novel candidates included two histone proteins HIST1H1D and HIST1H1C, in addition to the previously identified HIST1H1E. Another was IKZF3, affected by a recurrent sSNV resulting in a p.L162R change in its DNA binding domain, in close proximity to a region recently identified as critical for lenalidomide resistance in multiple myeloma (MM). An additional recurrently mutated gene was nuclear RNA export factor 1 (NXF1), which along with previously known recurrently mutated genes (SF3B1, XPO1, DDX3X), highlights the importance of RNA processing to CLL biology. Finally, this search for putative CLL driver genes also identified ASXL1 and TRAF3, already characterized as drivers in acute myeloid leukemia and MM, respectively. Of the 59 of 262 samples for which RNA-seq data were available, 76% of the identified driver mutations were detected and thereby validated. Validation using RNAseq detection of driver mutations and targeted sequencing within the entire cohort are ongoing. The larger size of our cohort enabled the separate application of the somatic mutation discovery process to samples with mutated or unmutated IGHV. Among the 147 samples with mutated IGHV, only 5 driver genes (TP53, SF3B1, MYD88, CHD2, RANBP2) retained significance. In contrast, analysis of the 102 IGHV unmutated samples revealed a distinct and more diverse pattern of recurrently mutated genes (lacking MYD88 and CHD2, and including NOTCH1, RPS15, POT1, NRAS, EGR2, BRAF, MED12, XPO1, BCOR, IKZF3, MAP2K1, FBXW7 and KRAS). This extended cohort also allowed for better resolution of the clinical impact of those genetic variants with greater than 4% prevalence in the cohort. For example, samples with POT1 mutations were found to be associated with shorter time from sample to therapy compared with those with wild-type POT1 (P= 0.02). Our study demonstrates that with larger cohort size, we can effectively detect putative driver genes with lower prevalence, but which may nonetheless have important biological and clinical impact. Moreover, our interrogation shows that subset analysis can reveal distinct driver patterns in different disease subsets. In particular, the marked clinical difference between CLLs with mutated and unmutated IGHV may reflect the higher likelihood of the latter group to harbor a broader spectrum of driver mutations with a more complex pattern of co-occurrence. Disclosures Brown: Sanofi, Onyx, Vertex, Novartis, Boehringer, GSK, Roche/Genentech, Emergent, Morphosys, Celgene, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, Gilead: Consultancy.

The sequencing of aggressive pediatric solid tumors is revealing remarkably stable genomes. In the cases of malignant rhabdoid and retinoblastoma, there is a paucity of recurrently mutated genes, and oncogenesis appears to be driven, at least in part, by epigenetic deregulation. It has been suggested that pediatric tumors characterized by oncogenic fusions will exhibit relatively few additional somatic driver aberrancies. Ewing sarcoma, the second most common pediatric bone tumor, is characterized by rearrangements of the EWS gene and ETS-family transcription factor genes, most commonly FLI and ERG. In experimental models, Ewing sarcoma demonstrates dependency on the expression of the resulting chimeric fusion products. As such, Ewing sarcoma represents a paradigm for studying the genomic landscape of fusion-driven cancers. To this end, we performed whole-exome sequencing of 96 Ewing sarcoma tumors and 11 Ewing sarcoma cell lines, as well as whole-genome sequencing, transcriptome sequencing, and copy-number analysis of a subset of these samples. We found that Ewing sarcoma is one of the most genetically normal cancers sequenced to date, but that treatment, which generally employs genotoxic chemotherapy and radiation, is associated with an increase in mutation rate and single nucleotide substitutions associated with DNA damage. There was a marked absence of recurrent mutations in immediately druggable targets, such as tyrosine kinases, calling into question the feasibility of utilizing tumor sequencing to nominate targeted therapies for patients with Ewing sarcoma. Rather, these results highlight the importance of directly targeting the EWS/ETS fusion events or identifying synthetic lethal dependencies. To this end, we clarified a number of outstanding questions regarding the EWS/ETS fusions. We found that reciprocal ETS/EWS fusions are not expressed in Ewing sarcoma and therefore unlikely to play a role in Ewing pathogenesis as is seen with reciprocal fusions of PML-RARα in acute promyelocytic leukemia. We also found that wild-type FLI and wild-type ERG are not expressed in Ewing sarcoma tumors. However, there appears to be a role for ETS gene deregulation in this disease beyond the expression of EWS/ETS fusion proteins because we found recurrent somatic events in ERF and ETS1. We also identified a small number of other recurrently mutated genes that likely collaborate with EWS/ETS fusions in a minority of cases and confirmed that loss of STAG2 occurs in approximately 15% of Ewing sarcoma tumors. Thus, massively parallel sequencing of a large collection of Ewing sarcoma tumors supports the notion that fusion-driven pediatric malignancies bear quiet genomes, underscores the importance of identifying new treatment approaches targeting EWS/ETS fusions, and also identifies new genetic abnormalities that warrant further biological validation. Citation Format: Brian Crompton, Chip Stewart, Amaro Taylor-Weiner, Gabriela Alexa, Kyle Kurek, Monica Calicchio, Adam Kiezun, Scott Carter, Sachet Shukla, Swapnil Mehta, Aaron Thorner, Carmen de Torres, Cinzia Lavarino, Mariona Sunol, Aaron McKenna, Andrey Sivachenko, Kristian Cibulskis, Michael Lawrence, Lauren Ambrogio, Daniel Auclair, Ivan Rosshandler, Angela Schwarz-Cruz y Celis, Miguel Rivera, Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, Mark Fleming, Todd Golub, Gad Getz, Jaume Mora, Kimberly Stegmaier. The genomic landscape of pediatric Ewing sarcoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 999. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-999

The availability of large numbers of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor DNA samples, together with accurate and specific clinical annotations, can be a great resource for in-depth analysis of correlations of somatic and germline DNA alterations with clinical outcome. However, the effects of this tissue preservation technique on next-generation DNA sequencing technologies and downstream analyses are still being investigated. Furthermore, usually the archives of such FFPE samples do not include matched normal tissue, which complicates the process of identifying somatic alterations. We are in the process of analyzing lung adenocarcinoma, colorectal and prostate patient datasets, which contain both an FFPE and a fresh-frozen tumor together with a matched blood normal sample. The availability of both a frozen and an FFPE tumor sample enables us to compare the detected somatic point mutations and indels, taking into account the fact that these pairs are produced from different aliquots of DNA. This analysis includes calculating the power to detect variants in the FFPE sample given that they have been observed in the fresh frozen tumor, as well as the validation rate of clonal SNVs between the two samples. We are also developing a method for classification of SNVs as germline or somatic without a paired normal sample by taking advantage of the fact that most tumor samples contain a substantial fraction of normal cells. Because stromal contamination has a different effect on the allelic fraction of somatic vs. germline SNVs, we can apply algorithms to estimate tumor purity and absolute somatic copy numbers in order to distinguish the two types of events. We present preliminary results from these analyses. Citation Format: Petar Stojanov, Scott L. Carter, Ivan Imaz Rosshandler, Andrey Sivachenko, Alberto Salido Guadarrama, Karla Vazquez, Sandra Romero Cordoba, Kristian Cibulskis, Carrie Sougnez, Douglas Voet, Gordon Saksena, Lee Lichtenstein, Lihua Zou, Scott Frazer, Chip Stewart, Rameen Beroukhim, Matthew Meyerson, Michael S. Lawrence, Gad Getz. Analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5135. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-5135

Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is a highly lethal tumor for which few targetable genetic alterations have been identified. SCLC is tightly associated with an extended history of tobacco use, and recent DNA sequencing studies have revealed highly mutated SCLC cancer genomes. Interestingly, two studies analyzing the human SCLC genome report distinct sets of putative driver mutations, highlighting the challenge of identifying functional events in highly mutated cancers. In the absence of environmental mutagens, a previously established genetically engineered mouse model of SCLC initiated by combined loss of Trp53 and Rb1 recapitulates the salient clinical features of human SCLC including tumor histologic progression and frequent distant metastases. This model has been shown to acquire DNA copy number alterations shared with human SCLC, suggesting that cross-species cancer genomics may identify a subset of driver events in human cancers. In order to characterize the spectrum of acquired events in murine SCLC and identify evolutionarily conserved drivers of SCLC progression, we define the somatic genome and transcriptome of a large panel of murine SCLC at single nucleotide resolution using exome, genome and RNA sequencing. We uncover complex subclonality in primary murine SCLC tumors and detect evidence for clonal selection during metastatic spread. As expected in the absence of environmental mutagens, we demonstrate a low somatic mutation frequency in murine SCLC. Using integrative genomic analyses we uncover alterations in chromatin remodeling enzymes and identify Pten as a critical tumor suppressor in this model. Engineered Pten deletion in murine SCLC dramatically accelerates tumorigenesis and fundamentally alters the genomic evolution of these tumors. This work represents the first large-scale comprehensive genomic characterization of a genetically engineered mouse cancer model at single nucleotide resolution, has implications for the nature of tumor evolution in mouse cancer models and identifies a potential therapeutic target in a subset of human SCLC. Citation Format: David G. McFadden, Thales Papagiannakopoulos, Kristian Cibulskis, Chip Stewart, Scott Carter, Amaro Taylor-Weiner, Arjun Bhutkar, Carrie Sougnez, Alison Dooley, Erica Shefler, Eric Lander, Stacey Gabriel, Gad Getz, Tyler Jacks. Comprehensive genomic analysis of murine small cell lung carcinoma uncovers recurrent Pten alterations that drive tumor progression and alter tumor genome evolution. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1084. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-1084

As researchers begin probing deep coverage sequencing data for increasingly rare mutations and subclonal events, the fidelity of next generation sequencing (NGS) laboratory methods will become increasingly critical. Although error rates for sequencing and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are well documented, the effects that DNA extraction and other library preparation steps could have on downstream sequence integrity have not been thoroughly evaluated. Here, we describe the discovery of novel C > A/G > T transversion artifacts found at low allelic fractions in targeted capture data. Characteristics such as sequencer read orientation and presence in both tumor and normal samples strongly indicated a non-biological mechanism. We identified the source as oxidation of DNA during acoustic shearing in samples containing reactive contaminants from the extraction process. We show generation of 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) lesions during DNA shearing, present analysis tools to detect oxidation in sequencing data and suggest methods to reduce DNA oxidation through the introduction of antioxidants. Further, informatics methods are presented to confidently filter these artifacts from sequencing data sets. Though only seen in a low percentage of reads in affected samples, such artifacts could have profoundly deleterious effects on the ability to confidently call rare mutations, and eliminating other possible sources of artifacts should become a priority for the research community., National Human Genome Research Institute (U.S.) (HG03067-05)

Background DNA capture technologies combined with high-throughput sequencing now enable cost-effective, deep-coverage, targeted sequencing of complete exomes. This is well suited for SNP discovery and genotyping. However there has been little attention devoted to Copy Number Variation (CNV) detection from exome capture datasets despite the potentially high impact of CNVs in exonic regions on protein function. Results As members of the 1000 Genomes Project analysis effort, we investigated 697 samples in which 931 genes were targeted and sampled with 454 or Illumina paired-end sequencing. We developed a rigorous Bayesian method to detect CNVs in the genes, based on read depth within target regions. Despite substantial variability in read coverage across samples and targeted exons, we were able to identify 107 heterozygous deletions in the dataset. The experimentally determined false discovery rate (FDR) of the cleanest dataset from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is 12.5%. We were able to substantially improve the FDR in a subset of gene deletion candidates that were adjacent to another gene deletion call (17 calls). The estimated sensitivity of our call-set was 45%. Conclusions This study demonstrates that exonic sequencing datasets, collected both in population based and medical sequencing projects, will be a useful substrate for detecting genic CNV events, particularly deletions. Based on the number of events we found and the sensitivity of the methods in the present dataset, we estimate on average 16 genic heterozygous deletions per individual genome. Our power analysis informs ongoing and future projects about sequencing depth and uniformity of read coverage required for efficient detection.

Retrotransposons comprise over 40% of the human genome and represent an important class of genetic variation. Though most elements are stationary ancient relics, it has recently been shown that some 100 elements remain highly active, copying and pasting themselves throughout the genome with each generation. Retrotransposon insertions can disrupt gene function, modulate gene expression, and lead to genomic rearrangement. These events have previously been implicated in cancer, including an account of insertional mutagenesis in APC as an early event in colon cancer progression. Due to the inherent difficulty in localizing repeat elements, however, an extensive investigation of retrotransposons’ role in cancer has not yet been performed. We developed RetroSeq, a computational framework to identify novel insertions of retrotransposons from paired-end sequencing data. In simulated data, RetroSeq identifies retrotransposon insertions with 99% sensitivity and 99% specificity. We ran RetroSeq on whole-genome sequencing data from a panel of tumors (including 9 colorectal, 20 non-small cell lung, 24 prostate and 22 breast tumors) and matched normal samples to determine the extent of somatic retrotransposon activity. We find a broad range of novel retrotransposon insertion events specific to each tumor, with some insertions falling in exonic as well as intronic and intergenic regions. These events were validated experimentally and integrated with expression and methylation data to provide a global view of retrotransposon activity in these samples. In sum, using RetroSeq we are able to localize novel retrotransposon insertions in paired-end sequencing data and provide evidence for the reactivation of retrotransposons in cancer. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5060. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-5060

Background Rare coding variants constitute an important class of human genetic variation, but are underrepresented in current databases that are based on small population samples. Recent studies show that variants altering amino acid sequence and protein function are enriched at low variant allele frequency, 2 to 5%, but because of insufficient sample size it is not clear if the same trend holds for rare variants below 1% allele frequency. Results The 1000 Genomes Exon Pilot Project has collected deep-coverage exon-capture data in roughly 1,000 human genes, for nearly 700 samples. Although medical whole-exome projects are currently afoot, this is still the deepest reported sampling of a large number of human genes with next-generation technologies. According to the goals of the 1000 Genomes Project, we created effective informatics pipelines to process and analyze the data, and discovered 12,758 exonic SNPs, 70% of them novel, and 74% below 1% allele frequency in the seven population samples we examined. Our analysis confirms that coding variants below 1% allele frequency show increased population-specificity and are enriched for functional variants. Conclusions This study represents a large step toward detecting and interpreting low frequency coding variation, clearly lays out technical steps for effective analysis of DNA capture data, and articulates functional and population properties of this important class of genetic variation.