51. Estimation of coalescence probabilities and population divergence times from SNP data
- Author
-
Christoph Theunert, Kristy Mualim, and Montgomery Slatkin
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,0301 basic medicine ,Demographic history ,Population ,Biology ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,Genome ,Article ,Evolutionary genetics ,Divergence ,03 medical and health sciences ,Genetics ,Animals ,Humans ,Coalescence (chemistry) ,education ,Denisovan ,Genetics (clinical) ,Alleles ,Neanderthals ,Probability ,Estimation ,Population Density ,education.field_of_study ,Evolutionary Biology ,Human Genome ,Rare variants ,biology.organism_classification ,030104 developmental biology ,Evolutionary biology ,Tree (set theory) - Abstract
We present a method called the G(A|B) method for estimating coalescence probabilities within population lineages from genome sequences when one individual is sampled from each population. Population divergence times can be estimated from these coalescence probabilities if additional assumptions about the history of population sizes are made. Our method is based on a method presented by Rasmussen et al. (2014) to test whether an archaic genome is from a population directly ancestral to a present-day population. The G(A|B) method does not require distinguishing ancestral from derived alleles or assumptions about demographic history before population divergence. We discuss the relationship of our method to two similar methods, one introduced by Green et al. (2010) and called the F(A|B) method and the other introduced by Schlebusch et al. (2017) and called the TT method. When our method is applied to individuals from three or more populations, it provides a test of whether the population history is treelike because coalescence probabilities are additive on a tree. We illustrate the use of our method by applying it to three high-coverage archaic genomes, two Neanderthals (Vindija and Altai) and a Denisovan.
- Published
- 2021