Search

Introduction Everyday walking often involves walking with divided attention (i.e., dual-tasking). Exercise interventions for older adults should mimic these simultaneous physical and cognitive demands. This proof-of-concept study had a two-fold purpose: 1) identify acute cognitive and gait benefits of a single session of virtual reality treadmill training (VRTT), relative to conventional treadmill training (CTT), and 2) identify differences between those who reduced dual-task costs (i.e., responders) on gait or cognition and those who did not, after the session. Methods Sixty older adults were randomized to complete a single 30-minute session of VRTT (n = 30, 71.2±6.5 years, 22 females) or CTT (n = 30, 72.0±7.7 years, 21 females). Pre- and post-exercise session, participants performed single-task walking, single-task cognitive, and dual-task walking trials while gait and cognition were recorded. Gait variables were gait speed and gait speed variability. Cognition variables were response reaction time, response accuracy, and cognitive throughput. Dual-task effects (DTE) on gait and cognition variables were also calculated. Results Post-exercise, there were no group differences (all p>0.05). During single- and dual-task trials, both groups walked faster (single-task: F(1, 58) = 9.560, p = 0.003; dual-task: F(1, 58) = 19.228, pF(1, 58) = 5.054, p = 0.028; dual-task: F(1, 58) = 8.543, p = 0.005), and reduced cognitive throughput (single-task: F(1, 58) = 6.425, p = 0.014; dual-task: F(1, 58) = 28.152, pF(1, 58) = 8.066, p = 0.006), response accuracy (F(1, 58) = 4.123, p = 0.047), and cognitive throughput (F(1, 58) = 6.807, p = 0.012). Gait responders and non-responders did not differ (all p>0.05), but cognitive responders completed fewer years of education (t(58) = 2.114, p = 0.039) and better information processing speed (t(58) = -2.265, p = 0.027) than cognitive non-responders. Conclusions The results indicate that both VRTT and CTT may acutely improve gait and cognition. Therefore, older adults will likely benefit from participating in either type of exercise. The study also provides evidence that baseline cognition can impact training effects on DTE on cognition.

Breast cancer risk is influenced by rare coding variants in susceptibility genes, such as BRCA1, and many common, mostly non-coding variants. However, much of the genetic contribution to breast cancer risk remains unknown. Here we report the results of a genome-wide association study of breast cancer in 122,977 cases and 105,974 controls of European ancestry and 14,068 cases and 13,104 controls of East Asian ancestry. We identified 65 new loci that are associated with overall breast cancer risk at P

There has been interest in the literature in the possible existence of a gene that predisposes to both breast cancer (BC) and colorectal cancer (CRC). We describe the detailed characterisation of one kindred, MON1080, with 10 cases of BC or CRC invasive cancer among 26 first-, second- or third-degree relatives. Linkage analysis suggested that a mutation was present in BRCA2. DNA sequencing from III: 22 (diagnosed with lobular BC) identified a BRCA2 exon 3 542G>T (L105X) mutation. Her sister (III: 25) had BC and endometrial cancer and carries the same mutation. Following immunohistochemical and microsatellite instability studies, mutation analysis by protein truncation test, cDNA sequencing and quantitative real-time PCR revealed a deletion of MSH2 exon 8 in III: 25, confirming her as a double heterozygote for truncating mutations in both BRCA2 and MSH2. The exon 8 deletion was identified as a 14.9 kb deletion occurring between two Alu sequences. The breakpoint lies within a sequence of 45 bp that is identical in both Alu sequences. In this large BC/CRC kindred, MON1080, disease-causing truncating mutations are present in both MSH2 and BRCA2. There appeared to be no increased susceptibility to the development of colorectal tumours in BRCA2 mutation carriers or to the development of breast tumours in MSH2 mutation carriers. Additionally, two double heterozygotes did not appear to have a different phenotype than would be expected from the presence of a mutation in each gene alone.

The MSH2*1906G--C mutation was recently shown to be a rare yet highly penetrant mutation leading to colorectal cancer. The mutation was only found among Ashkenazi Jewish individuals and lies on an extended haplotype that is common in that population. This study determined that the mutation probably arose between 11 and 22 generations ago, during the time when the Ashkenazim were living in eastern Europe.

Founder mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 have been reported in many different populations. We studied 105 Coloured and 16 Black Xhosa women residing in the Western Cape of South Africa diagnosed with breast cancer. We screened these patients using our standard panel of six previously reported SA Afrikaner and Ashkenazi Jewish BRCA1/2 mutations and identified only two Afrikaner mutations. Further screening by the protein truncation test (BRCA1 exon 11, and BRCA2 exons 10 and 11) revealed an additional four deleterious mutations (BRCA1 c.1504_ 1508del,p.Leu502AlafsX2, BRCA2 c.2826_2829del,p.Ile943LysfsX16, c.6447_6448dup,p.Lys2150IlefsX19 and c.5771_5774del,p.Ile1924Argfs X38). The latter, also known in Breast Cancer Information Core nomenclature as 5999del4, was identified in 4 of 105 (3.8%) Coloureds and 4 of 16 (25%) Xhosa women, which makes it a frequent founder mutation in the Western Cape Province. Although this mutation was previously reported to occur in the Netherlands, haplotype analysis indicated two distinct origins for the Dutch and South African mutations, excluding the possibility of a common Dutch ancestor and suggesting gene flow from the indigenous tribes such as the Xhosa to the Coloured population instead. Further studies to determine the carrier rate of this variant in the Xhosa and other SA populations are warranted.

Three BRCA1/2 mutations ( 185delAG and 5382insC in BRCA1 , and 617delT in BRCA2 ) are present in about 2.5% of the Ashkenazi Jewish population,1–4 and in 10–12% of Ashkenazi Jewish women with breast cancer.5 Mutations that become common in a population are often explained by the presence of a “founder effect”. This effect tends to exist when a population is established by a small group of ancestors. The members of the group are called founders and become isolated from the original population from which they are derived on account of geographical, cultural, or linguistic barriers. If this isolation persists, genetic drift can cause disease producing alleles present in the founders to become more frequent in subsequent generations. The San Luis Valley (SLV) is a large, isolated valley situated on the border between New Mexico and Colorado. The first settlers were Spaniards of the de Onate expedition in 1598, but today it has an admixed population descended from Native Americans, West Africans, and Europeans.6 A previous study in Colorado of breast cancer patients with SLV ancestry revealed the presence of a hereditary breast cancer mutation, BRCA1 : 185delAG .7 Many of these individuals came from areas of Spanish settlement in what is now northern New Mexico, an area known to have had a number of Spanish settlers with Jewish heritage. This population remained fairly coherent until the mid-1900s, which would have allowed the fixation of certain mutations in the population through the founder effect.8 The 185delAG mutation (c.68_69del2) is a founder mutation in the Ashkenazi Jewish population and is the most common BRCA1 mutation in this population, with a frequency of 1%.2,3 Markers flanking this mutation have conserved alleles among Ashkenazi carriers, allowing for the construction of a distinct, linked haplotype.4 In this …

Multiple primary cancers are characteristic of hereditary cancer syndromes. A familial association between breast and thyroid cancer has been suggested, but a genetic basis for this association has not yet been established. To determine the extent to which double primary cancers of the breast and thyroid are due to common hereditary factors, we conducted a registry- and hospital-based study in Ontario and Quebec. We obtained family histories of 74 women diagnosed with both cancer of the breast and thyroid before 70 years of age. Cancer histories were obtained for the 533 first- degree relatives of these women. The observed cancer rate in the relatives was compared with the expected number, based on age- standardized Canadian cancer incidence rates, and relative risks were estimated. A total of 87 cancers were observed in the relatives, compared to 93.7 expected cancers, giving a relative risk of 0.9 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7-1.1). The risk for breast cancer was 1.1 (95% CI: 0.6-1.7) and the risk for thyroid cancer was 0.7 (95% CI: 0-3.8). Blood samples were collected on 53 patients for mutational analysis of the BRCA1, BRCA2, and PTEN genes. One woman was found to be a carrier of a BRCA1 mutation (exon 11 3227delT). Our findings do not support the hypothesis that a significant proportion of double primary cancers of the breast and thyroid are due to hereditary factors.

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is caused by mutations in the mismatch-repair genes. We report here the identification and characterization of a founder mutation in MSH2 in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. We identified a nucleotide substitution, MSH2*1906G→C, which results in a substitution of proline for alanine at codon 636 in the MSH2 protein. This allele was identified in 15 unrelated Ashkenazi Jewish families with HNPCC, most of which meet the Amsterdam criteria. Genotype analysis of 18 polymorphic loci within and flanking MSH2 suggested a single origin for the mutation. All colorectal cancers tested showed microsatellite instability and absence of MSH2 protein, by immunohistochemical analysis. In an analysis of a population-based incident series of 686 Ashkenazi Jews from Israel who have colorectal cancer, we identified 3 (0.44%) mutation carriers. Persons with a family history of colorectal or endometrial cancer were more likely to carry the mutation than were those without such a family history (P=.042), and those with colorectal cancer who carried the mutation were, on average, younger than affected individuals who did not carry it (P=.033). The mutation was not detected in either 566 unaffected Ashkenazi Jews from Israel or 1,022 control individuals from New York. In hospital-based series, the 1906C allele was identified in 5/463 Ashkenazi Jews with colorectal cancer, in 2/197 with endometrial cancer, and in 0/83 with ovarian cancer. When families identified by family history and in case series are included, 25 apparently unrelated Ashkenazi Jewish families have been found to harbor this mutation. Although this pathogenic mutation is not frequent in the Ashkenazi Jewish population (accounting for 2%–3% of colorectal cancer in those whose age at diagnosis is

At least 25% of Ashkenazi Jewish families with two or more cases of premenopausal breast cancers are attributable to one of three founder mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. As these three founder mutations are common in the Ashkenazi Jewish population ( approximately 2.5%) and can easily be tested for in a multiplex assay, establishing ethnicity can expedite genetic testing. It is not always possible, however, to conclusively establish ethnicity before offering testing. We report here the occurrence of a founder Ashkenazi Jewish BRCA1 mutation, 185delAG (also known as 187delAG), in a non-Jewish Chilean family with no reported Jewish ancestry. The linked haplotype present in this family was identical to that identified in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. This case report not only illustrates the problem of the definition of ethnicity but also points to the possibility of further studies of the frequency of founder Ashkenazi Jewish mutations in populations not generally considered to be of Ashkenazi Jewish origin.

The frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women with breast cancer varies according to the age at diagnosis, family history of cancer, and ethnicity/country of origin. We set out to estimate the frequency of seven previously described founder mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in all eligible French Canadian women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer at one Montreal hospital over a 20-month period. One hundred and ninety-two patients were eligible and 127 (66.2%) provided blood for genetic testing. We identified 4 women who carried a founder mutation (3.1%, 95% confidence interval 0.9-7.9%) in this population. Interestingly, all the mutations were in BRCA2. The mean age at diagnosis for mutation carriers was 51.2 years (range 49.1-53.5). Two of these 4 cases were lobular invasive carcinomas and 2 were ductal carcinomas, histological grade 1 or 2. Despite a small tumor size (or =20 mm), axillary nodal involvement was present in 3 women. Estrogen receptors were strongly expressed in all cases. Two of the 4 cases reported a strong family history of breast cancer, but a family history of site-specific breast cancer was a relatively poor indicator of the presence of BRCA2 mutations. The absence of BRCA1 mutations may be a result of chance, but may also reflect different geographical origins of the most common BRCA1 mutations within the French Canadian population.