Search

The European Federation of Statisticians in the Pharmaceutical Industry (EFSPI) believes access to clinical trial data should be implemented in a way that supports good research, avoids misuse of such data, lies within the scope of the original informed consent and fully protects patient confidentiality. In principle, EFSPI supports responsible data sharing. EFSPI acknowledges it is in the interest of patients that their data are handled in a strictly confidential manner to avoid misuse under all possible circumstances. It is also in the interest of the altruistic nature of patients participating in trials that such data will be used for further development of science as much as possible applying good statistical principles. This paper summarises EFSPI's position on access to clinical trial data. The position was developed during the European Medicines Agency (EMA) advisory process and before the draft EMA policy on publication and access to clinical trial data was released for consultation; however, the EFSPI's position remains unchanged following the release of the draft policy. Finally, EFSPI supports a need for further guidance to be provided on important technical aspects relating to re-analyses and additional analyses of clinical trial data, for example, multiplicity, meta-analysis, subgroup analyses and publication bias. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aims to investigate the barriers that exist when implementing continuous improvement methodologies, such as Lean Six Sigma (LSS), within the Irish Pharma industry. The main finding of this study is that 45% of participants perceived that a highly regulated environment could be a barrier to continuous improvement implementation, while 97% of respondents utilised Continuous improvement (CI) methods, such as Lean, Six Sigma, and LSS, within their organisations. While the International Conference of Harmonisation integrates CI into its Pharmaceutical Quality Systems (PQS) regulations, the highest motivation for CI implementation amongst the Irish Pharma industry is to improve Productivity and Quality. The main obstacles highlighted for CI implementation in Pharma attributed to stringent regulatory regimes were fear of extra validation activity, a compliance versus quality culture, and a regulatory culture of being "safe". Another relevant finding presented in this paper is that participants CI LSS tools are very strongly integrated into the pharma industries corrective and preventative action system, deviations, and internal audit systems. Limitations of the research are that all the data collected in the survey came from professionals working for multinational Pharmaceutical companies based in Ireland. The authors understand that this is the first research focused on the barriers and status of CI initiatives in the pharmaceutical industry. The results of this study represent an important step towards understanding the enablers and obstacles for the use of continuous improvement methodologies in pharmaceutical manufacturing industries on a global scale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The authors discuss the regulatory practices of the European Union (EU) for the improvement of new medicines. The authors say that EU member states contribute in the regulatory network, and they coordinate in the regulatory procedures of thr European Medicines Agency (EMA). The authors mention the future strategy papers published by the EMA and the Heads of Medicines Agencies (HMA) to strengthen the European regulatory network and its contribution in the medicinal products for patients.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has released a new guideline on the clinical investigation of antidepressants. The guideline aims to improve the efficacy, safety, and personalization of these medications. It provides information on depressive disorders, clinical trial methodology, statistical analysis, and requirements for trials in difficult-to-treat populations. The guideline also discusses the use of psychedelics in depression treatment and highlights the need for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. The ongoing consultation process will address remaining challenges in the field. [Extracted from the article]

The article focuses on the classification of recent developments in regulations related to biomedical technology in Europe. Several innovations by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) led to the formation of the new Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMP) Regulation, which is related to the field of regenerative medicine. Regenerative medicine is used for the treatment of major medical conditions such as heart disease, diabetes, and cancer. Classification of biomedical technology involves commensuration, which draws the attention of distinct cognitive or practical domains.

The International Conference on Harmonisation's electronic Common Technical Document (eCTD) endeavors to significantly change the pharmaceutical submission process. After decades of using paper, the goal is the electronic transfer of drug applications and their review across submission formats, procedures, and regions. However, it is still unclear whether implementing eCTD really brings more advantages than disadvantages and, if so, for what kind of companies. After an expert interview was conducted in 2009, this research study was formed as an international survey officially supported by the European Medicines Agency in 2010. Overall, 963 responses were received, and 397 were used for the subsequent study analysis. Although a three-fourths majority of those with eCTD experience reported disadvantages in implementing eCTD, an overwhelming majority of the same group reported advantages that outweighed the disadvantages, some of them significantly. More than three-quarters of individuals with eCTD experience were able to shorten their total time to approval, and more than 90% of this group was able to demonstrate cost savings relative to paper submissions, regardless of their company kind, size, or number of submissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The product Teysuno™ (S-1) contains tegafur, a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and two modulators of 5-FU metabolism, gimeracil and oteracil. The main clinical study in this application was a randomized controlled study comparing S-1 plus cisplatin with 5-FU plus cisplatin. In this study, median overall survival times of 8.6 months and 7.9 months for S-1 plus cisplatin and 5-FU plus cisplatin, respectively, were observed (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.80 -1.05). The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use of the European Medicines Agency concluded that S-1 in combination with cisplatin (75 mg/m2) was noninferior to 5-FU plus cisplatin (100 mg/m2) in patients with advanced gastric cancer and adopted a positive opinion recommending the marketing authorization for this product for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer when given in combination with cisplatin. The recommended dose of S-1 is 25 mg/m2 (expressed as tegafur content) twice a day, for 21 consecutive days followed by 7 days rest (one treatment cycle), in combination with 75 mg/m2 cisplatin i.v. administered on day 1. This treatment cycle is repeated every 4 weeks. The most common side effects reported in the pivotal study were anemia, neutropenia, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, weight decrease, anorexia, and fatigue. The objective of this paper is to summarize the scientific review of the application leading to approval in the EU. The full scientific assessment report and the summary of product characteristics are available on the European Medicines Agency website (http://www.ema.europa.eu). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Non-inferiority trials test whether a new product is not unacceptably worse than a product already in use. This paper introduces concepts related to non-inferiority, and discusses the regulatory views of both the European Medicines Agency and the United States Food and Drug Administration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract The health benefits of the antimicrobial's use is inherently associated to the risk of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), an ever-increasing multifactorial problem, closely related with injudicious use of antimicrobials, and the lack of new antimicrobial medicines on the market, particularly for veterinary use. Currently, an increasing number of regulatory "One Health" action plans on AMR are running worldwide, already based on monitoring and surveillance systems for resistance and antimicrobials consumption. Such plans are still not mandatory in the European Union member States (EU-MS), but post marketing annual programmes for quality controls of medicines are, to verify and ensure full compliance with the marketing authorizations. The European "risk level" sampling is not based on the conventional risk-ranking process of severity factors vs the probability of occurrence, but instead, on the conviction that in the European Union (EU) all medicines are produced under good manufacturer practices (GMP) and rigorously controlled for quality by the marketing authorization holders (MAH). The present paper links poor-quality antimicrobials and AMR, highlighting examples of regulatory initiatives on this subject outside the EU, particularly those resulting from the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations. It also intends to trigger a discussion on the role of such quality control programmes, particularly for antimicrobials, beyond the control at any stage of the quality parameters of a marketed medicine, to reflect whether or not it might be relevant to other regulatory coordinated actions against AMR. Highlights • Importance of antibiotic premixes, as oral forms, for antimicrobial resistance. • Good practices for medicine manufacturing and distribution should cover medicated feed. • European monitoring programmes of AMR must include quality of VAMs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

On April 19, 2010, the European Commission issued a conditional marketing authorization valid throughout the European Union (EU) for ofatumumab (Arzerra®; Glaxo Group Ltd, Greenford, Middlesex, U.K.). The decision was based on the favorable opinion of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use recommending a conditional marketing authorization for ofatumumab for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in patients refractory to fludarabine and alemtuzumab. A conditional marketing authorization means that additional data to confirm the benefit-risk balance of ofatumumab are awaited. The active substance of Arzerra® is ofatumumab, a monoclonal antibody medicinal product (ATC code L01XC10). The recommended dose is 300 mg of atumumab for the first infusion and 2,000 mg of atumumabfor all subsequent infusions. The infusion schedule is eight consecutive weekly infusions, followed 4-5 weeks later by four consecutive monthly (i.e., every 4 weeks) infusions. Ofatumumab targets CD20, a cell surface marker of B lymphocytes, which is followed by cell lysis via complement- dependent cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. The benefit of ofatumumab is the control of CLL in patients who are refractory to both fludarabine and alemtuzumab, which was indicated by a high response rate. The most common side effects are infections and infusion reactions. The objective of this paper is to summarize the scientific review of the application leading to approval in the EU. The detailed scientific assessment report and product information, including the summary of product characteristics, are available on the EMAwebsite (http://www.ema.europa.eu). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The European Medicines Agency (EMEA) leads in providing regulatory guidelines to this emerging industry. While biosimilars are not yet available in the United States, as the legal and regulatory pathway is being developed there, biosimilars and other such products are marketed in other regions of the world. We reviewed the European assessment reports of biosimilars to gain insights into the current practices pertaining to the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) similarity evaluations because we believe that they might help to shape the future global regulatory landscape. This paper illustrates the molecular complexity of therapeutic proteins, challenges associated with PK and PD evaluations, limitations of similarity assessment using PK and PD endpoints, and design considerations for PK and PD studies. The scope of biotechnology-derived products will be limited to therapeutic protein products, including recombinant human proteins, fusion proteins, and monoclonal antibodies. The challenges to demonstrate similarity are complex and appear to be unique to each therapeutic agent; therefore, the requirements for regulatory approval will most likely continue to be handled at a product-specific level as stipulated in current EMEA guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Considering the high incidence and mortality of breast cancer, a lot of trials evaluating new drugs for the treatment of this disease are currently ongoing. However, few drugs show a statistically and clinically significant improvement in the outcomes leading to the Competent Authority approval. In this review we analyzed the European Medicines Agency breast cancer drug indications issued between January 2015 and June 2021 and we evaluated the clinical trials results leading to the approval and their update. Breast cancer represents the first cause of cancer worldwide and the leading cause of cancer mortality for women. Therefore, new therapies are needed to improve the prognosis of women diagnosed with this disease. In this review, we summarize the new drug indications for the treatment of breast cancer approved by European Medicines Agency between January 2015 and June 2021. In particular, we analyzed the clinical trials results leading to approvals and their update (when available), according to setting (localized and locally advanced or metastatic) and clinical features (hormone receptor positive, HER2 positive, triple negative, BRCA 1/2 mutation). The aim of this paper is to describe the clinical benefit obtained with the new indications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are at the core of the European Commission competitiveness policy. With the entering into force of the latest revision of the European pharmaceutical legislation, new regulatory provisions have been laid down to help these small but dynamic players when dealing with the so-called centralised marketing authorisation procedure and the European Medicines Agency (EMEA). The new incentives address both financial and administrative aspects, such as fee reductions and deferrals for a number of EMEA services, handling of translations, and the establishment of a dedicated SME Office within the Agency. In this paper we explore the newly established regulation and the various provisions to analyse its implications for SMEs in general and generic manufacturers in particular. We also review the underlying assumptions, especially the Community SME definition, and discuss the policy objectives that led to the establishment of this new piece of legislation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) fosters access to innovative medicines through accelerated procedures and flexibility in the authorization requirements for diseases with unmet medical needs, such as many rare diseases as well as oncological diseases. However, the resulting increase of medicines being marketed with conditional authorizations and in exceptional circumstances has lead to higher clinical uncertainty about their efficacy and safety than when the standard authorizations are applied. This uncertainty has significant implications for clinical practice and the negotiation of pricing and reimbursement, particularly as high prices are based on assumptions of high value, supported by regulatory prioritization. The burden of clinical development is often shifted towards public healthcare systems, resulting in increased spending budgets and opportunity costs. Effective management of uncertainty, through appropriate testing and evaluation, and fair reflection of costs and risks in prices, is crucial. However, it is important not to sacrifice essential elements of evidence-based healthcare for the sake of access to new treatments. Balancing sensitive and rational access to new treatments, ensuring their safety, efficacy, and affordability to healthcare systems requires thoughtful decision-making. Ultimately, a responsible approach to timely access to innovative medicines that balances the needs of patients with healthcare systems' concerns is necessary. This approach emphasizes the importance of evidence-based decision-making and fair pricing and reimbursement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Rare diseases negatively impact patients' quality of life, but the estimation of health state utility values (HSUVs) in research studies and cost–utility models for health technology assessment is challenging. Objectives: This study compared the methods for estimating the HSUVs included in manufacturers' submissions of orphan drugs to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) with those of published studies addressing the same rare diseases to understand whether manufacturers fully exploited the existing literature in developing their economic models. Methods: All NICE Technology Appraisal (TA) and Highly Specialized Technologies (HST) guidance documents of non-cancer European Medicines Agency (EMA) orphan medicinal products were reviewed and compared with any published primary studies, retrieved via PubMed until November 2020, and estimating HSUVs for the same conditions addressed in manufacturers' submissions. Results: We identified 22 NICE TA/HST appraisal reports addressing 19 different rare diseases. Sixteen reports presented original HSUVs estimated using EQ-5D or Health Utility Index (n = 12), direct methods (n = 2) or mapping (n = 2), while the other six included values obtained from the literature only. In parallel, we identified 111 published studies: 86.6% used preference-based measures (mainly EQ-5D, 60.7%), 12.5% direct techniques, and 2.7% mapping. The collection of values from non-patient populations (using 'vignettes') was more frequent in manufacturers' submissions than in the literature (22.7% vs. 8.0%). Conclusions: The agreement on methodological choices between manufacturers' submissions and published literature was only partial. More efforts should be made by manufacturers to accurately reflect the academic literature and its methodological recommendations in orphan drugs submissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has revised their estimate of the toxicity of bisphenol A (BPA) and, as a result, have recommended reducing the tolerable daily intake (TDI) by 20 000-fold. This would essentially ban the use of BPA in food packaging such as can liners, plastic food containers, and in consumer products. To come to this conclusion, EFSA used a systematic approach according to a pre-established protocol and included all guideline and nonguideline studies in their analysis. They found that Th-17 immune cells increased with very low exposure to BPA and used this endpoint to revise the TDI to be human health protective. A number of regulatory agencies including the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have written formal disagreements with several elements of EFSA's proposal. The European Commission will now decide whether to accept EFSA's recommendation over the objections of EMA. If the Commission accepts EFSA's recommendation, it will be a landmark action using knowledge acquired through independent scientific studies focused on biomarkers of chronic disease to protect human health. The goal of this Perspective is to clearly articulate the monumental nature of this debate and decision and to explain what is at stake. Our perspective is that the weight of evidence clearly supports EFSA's proposal to reduce the TDI by 20 000-fold. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Consensus of regulatory decisions on the same Marketing Authorization Application (MAA) are critical for stakeholders. In this context, regulatory decision patterns from the Swissmedic (SMC), the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) were analyzed for hemato‐oncology products (OP) and non‐oncology products (NOP). We compared 336 SMC regulatory decisions between 2009 and 2018 on new active substances with the EMA and the FDA for OP (n = 77) and NOP (n = 259) regarding approval rates, consensus, and divergent decisions. For OP MAA, we analyzed the underlying reasons for divergent decisions; for consensus decisions, the similarity and strictness of labeling. For OP, the approval rate for the SMC was 88.4%, the EMA 91.3%, and the FDA 95.7%. For NOP, the SMC had an approval rate of 86.2%, the EMA of 93.8%, and the FDA of 88.8%. The consensus decision rate among agencies was 88.4% for OP and 84.4% for NOP. The main clinical driver for divergent decisions for OP was nonrandomized trial design and low patient numbers. Comparing the approved indication wordings, the highest similarity was between the SMC and the EMA, and lowest for the FDA and the EMA. Investigating label strictness, the FDA numerically had the highest but not‐statistically significant number of strict labels. The approval rate stratified by disease area (OP and NOP) differed among the SMC, the EMA, and the FDA. High concordance in regulatory decisions was observed between agencies for OP as well as NOP. Reasons for divergent decisions regarding OP were mainly due to scientific uncertainties. Comparing strictness of indications, numerical but no statistically significant differences were observed between agencies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Veterinary antibiotics have become a major concern due to potential environmental effects. This study presents an investigation of the exposure and environmental effects of the veterinary medicinal product in powder form, administered in the drinking water of piglets, chickens and turkeys, containing 250 mg/g penicillin G (benzylpenicillin potassium), performed according to the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) guideline and the results obtained by an analytical method based on online solid-phase extraction, ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (SPE-online-UHPLC-MS/MS). The study presents the determination of the environmental risk and through an original, interactive, fast software method, created on the basis of a proprietary calculation algorithm that goes through all the prescriptions and recommendations of the EMEA guide. The results demonstrated that the concentration value for penicillin G determined in surface water by SPE-online-UHPLC-MS/MS is much lower than that predicted by calculation (predictable concentration in surface water, PECsurface water = 37.66 µg/L and the concentration SPE-online-UHPLC-MS/MS = 0.032 µg/L). Both results lead to a sub-unit risk quotient (R) indicating that the treatment carried out with the considered veterinary product does not present any risk to the environment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Niels Kaj Jerne has proposed the "immune network theory" of interactions among anti‐idiotypic antibodies, able to interfere with humoral responses to certain antigens. After the occurrence of the primary generation of antibodies, against an antigenic epitope, idiotypes of these antibodies induce anti‐idiotypic antibodies that modulate the intensity of the first response, and so on. Adverse effects following SARS‐COV‐2 COVID‐19 vaccines are occasionally similar to the symptoms of COVID‐19 infection. Rare events linked to SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines also resemble some rarely reported COVID‐19 complications. Safety data from product information by European Medicines Agency suggest that spectra do overlap for four main vaccines. The proposition is that vaccine events and COVID‐19 complications are related to anti‐idiotypic antibodies whose spatial shape can lead to interactions with ACE2 molecules, in individuals with a prolonged Spike protein synthesis. The vaccines target cells by their affinity to the vaccine vector, or to engulf lipid nanoparticles. Anti‐idiotypic antibodies shaped similarly to the Spike protein possibly interact with ACE2 molecules and cause diverse signs and symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Whereas islet autoantibodies (AAs) are well‐established risk factors for developing type 1 diabetes (T1D), there is a lack of biomarkers endorsed by regulators to enrich clinical trial populations for those at risk of developing T1D. As such, the development of therapies that delay or prevent the onset of T1D remains challenging. To address this drug development need, the Critical Path Institute's T1D Consortium (T1DC) acquired patient‐level data from multiple observational studies and used a model‐based approach to evaluate the utility of islet AAs as enrichment biomarkers in clinical trials. An accelerated failure time model was developed, discussed in our previous publication, which provided the underlying evidence required to receive a qualification opinion for islet AAs as enrichment biomarkers from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in March 2022. To further democratize the use of the model for scientists and clinicians, we developed a Clinical Trial Enrichment Graphical User Interface. The interactive tool allows users to specify trial participant characteristics, including the percentage of participants with a specific AA combination. Users can specify ranges for participant baseline age, sex, blood glucose measurement from the 120‐minute timepoints of an oral glucose tolerance test, and HbA1c. The tool then applies the model to predict the mean probability of a T1D diagnosis for that trial population and renders the results to the user. To ensure adequate data privacy and to make the tool open‐source, a deep learning‐based generative model was used to generate a cohort of synthetic subjects that underpins the tool. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cell and gene therapy (CGT) describes a broad category of medicinal products with potential applications to prevent and treat human disease in multiple therapeutic areas. These therapies leverage the use of modified nucleic acids, altered cells or tissue, or both. The modality, mechanism, route of administration, and therapeutic indication for a CGT product will influence the challenges and opportunities for early clinical development, some of which may be highly specific to the product under consideration. Both the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) encourage early interaction between sponsor and health authority to align on key elements of the CGT development program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cenobamate (CNB), ([(R)-1-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(2H-tetrazol-2-yl)ethyl], is a novel tetrazole alkyl carbamate derivative. In November 2019, the Food and Drug Administration approved Xcopri®, marketed by SK Life Science Inc., (Paramus, NJ, USA) for adult focal seizures. The European Medicines Agency approved Ontozry® by Arvelle Therapeutics Netherlands B.V.(Amsterdam, The Neatherlands) in March 2021. Cenobamate is a medication that could potentially change the perspectives regarding the management and prognosis of refractory epilepsy. In this way, this study aims to review the literature on CNB's pharmacological properties, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety. CNB is a highly effective drug in managing focal onset seizures, with more than twenty percent of individuals with drug-resistant epilepsy achieving seizure freedom. This finding is remarkable in the antiseizure medication literature. The mechanism of action of CNB is still poorly understood, but it is associated with transient and persistent sodium currents and GABAergic neurotransmission. In animal studies, CNB showed sustained efficacy and potency in the 6 Hz test regardless of the stimulus intensity. CNB was revealed to be the most cost-effective drug among different third-generation antiseizure medications. Also, CNB could have neuroprotective effects. However, there are still concerns regarding its potential for abuse and suicidality risk, which future studies should clearly assess, after which protocols should be changed. The major drawback of CNB therapy is the slow and complex titration and maintenance phases preventing the wide use of this new agent in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The evaluation of clinical evidence takes account of health benefit (efficacy and safety) and the degree of certainty in the estimate of benefit. In orphan indications practical and ethical challenges in conducting clinical trials, particularly in paediatric patients, often limit the available evidence, rendering structured evaluation challenging. While acknowledging the paucity of evidence, regulators and reimbursement authorities compare the efficacy and safety of alternative treatments for a given indication, often in the context of the benefits of other treatments for similar or different conditions. This study explores the feasibility of using the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) Evidence Rating Matrix for Comparative Clinical Effectiveness in structured assessment of both the magnitude of clinical benefit (net health benefit, NHB) and the certainty of the effect estimate in a sample of orphan therapies for paediatric indications. Results: Eleven systemic therapies with European Medicines Agency (EMA) orphan medicinal product designation, licensed for 16 paediatric indications between January 2017 and March 2020 were identified using OrphaNet and EMA databases and were selected for evaluation with the ICER Evidence Rating Matrix: burosumab; cannabidiol; cerliponase alfa; chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA); dinutuximab beta; glibenclamide; metreleptin; nusinersen; tisagenlecleucel; velmanase alfa; and vestronidase alfa. EMA European Public Assessment Reports, PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Clinical Key, and conference presentations from January 2016 to April 2021 were searched for evidence on efficacy and safety. Two of the identified therapies were graded as "substantial" NHB: dinutuximab beta (neuroblastoma maintenance) and nusinersen (Type I SMA), and one as "comparable" NHB (CDCA). The NHB grade of the remaining therapies fell between "comparable" and "substantial". No therapies were graded as having negative NHB. The certainty of the estimate ranged from "high" (dinutuximab beta in neuroblastoma maintenance) to "low" (CDCA, metreleptin and vestronidase alfa). The certainty of the other therapies was graded between "low" and "high". The ICER Evidence Rating Matrix overall rating "A" (the highest) was given to two therapies, "B+" to 6 therapies, "C+" to five therapies, and "I" (the lowest) to three therapies. The scores varied between rating authors with mean agreement over all indications of 71.9% for NHB, 56.3% for certainty and 68.8% for the overall rating. Conclusions: Using the ICER Matrix to grade orphan therapies according to their treatment benefit and certainty is feasible. However, the assessment involves subjective judgements based on heterogenous evidence. Tools such as the ICER Matrix might aid decision makers to evaluate treatment benefit and its certainty when comparing therapies across indications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An economical & eco-friendly spectrofluorometric method has been developed for the determination of prucalopride succinate (PRU) in human urine on the basis of the drug's native fluorescence. The type of solvent and the wavelengths of excitation and emission have been carefully selected for optimal experimental conditions. In deionized water, the fluorescence intensity was measured at λ emission 362 nm upon excitation at 310 nm. This bio-validated method was carried out using 30uL urine without any preliminary steps. The calibration curve for prucalopride succinate shows a linear relationship in a concentration range of 0.75–5.5 µg/mL. Accuracy and precision were obtained using 4 quality control samples which are: 0.75 μg/ mL (LLOQ), 2.25 μg/mL (QCL), 2.5 μg/mL (QCM) & 4.125 µg/mL (QCH). The validation of this proposed technique obeys European Medicines Agency (EMA) Guidelines for validating bioanalytical methods and the greenness assessment was evaluated according to the Analytical GAPI approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Four vaccines have been authorized by the European Medicines Agency (EMA): viral vector-based vaccines (AstraZeneca; AZD1222 and Johnson & Johnson; Ad26.COV2. and 2 mRNA-based vaccines (Pfizer/BioNTech; BNT162b2 and Moderna; mRNA-1273). Adverse events (AEs) related to vaccination have been described in the literature. The main aim of the dermatological practice was to avoid the diffusion of COVID-19, allowing the continuity of care for patients. Objective: The aim of this review article is to investigate current literature regarding cutaneous reactions following COVID-19 vaccination, mainly inflammatory dermatological diseases. Materials and methods: Investigated manuscripts included metanalyses, reviews, letters to the editor, real-life studies, case series, and reports. Results: We selected a total of 234 articles involving more than 550 patients. We have divided the results section into various sub-sections to ensure greater understanding for readers. Conclusions: Clinicians should keep in mind the possibility of new onsets or the worsening of several dermatoses following vaccination in order to promptly recognize and treat these AEs. Certainly, vaccination should not be discouraged. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study seeks to investigate the impact of strengthened requirements for clinical evaluation for medical device manufacturers in Europe due to the new Medical Device Regulations. Qualitative interviews were conducted with eight clinical evaluation consultants from eight different European countries who review and approve clinical evaluation reports for manufacturers prior to their submission to notified bodies. The study describes the sources of device clinical evaluation evidence and describes the consultants' recommendations and challenges encountered when reviewing Clinical Evaluation Reports. The findings from the study demonstrate that understanding what constitutes sufficient clinical evidence poses the biggest challenge to the generation of an MDR-compliant Clinical Evaluation Report. Additionally, the study identified a knowledge and skills gap in the generation and assessment of acceptable regulatory and clinical data. Further, there is heterogeneity in the reviews of Clinical Evaluation Reports received by consultants and inadequate guidance to enable compliance by manufacturers. This study found that some manufacturers of certain CE-marked medical devices are planning to remove them from the EU market upon expiration of their certificate, and in the case of new innovative devices, some manufacturers may launch in other non-EU markets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Conditional (European Medicines Agency) or accelerated (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) approval of drugs allows earlier access to promising new treatments that address unmet medical needs. Certain post‐marketing requirements must typically be met in order to obtain full approval, such as conducting a new post‐market clinical trial. We study the applicability of the recently developed harmonic mean χ2‐test to this conditional or accelerated approval framework. The proposed approach can be used both to support the design of the post‐market trial and the analysis of the combined evidence provided by both trials. Other methods considered are the two‐trials rule, Fisher's criterion and Stouffer's method. In contrast to some of the traditional methods, the harmonic mean χ2‐test always requires a post‐market clinical trial. If the p‐value from the pre‐market clinical trial is ≪0.025, a smaller sample size for the post‐market clinical trial is needed than with the two‐trials rule. For illustration, we apply the harmonic mean χ2‐test to a drug which received conditional (and later full) market licensing by the EMA. A simulation study is conducted to study the operating characteristics of the harmonic mean χ2‐test and two‐trials rule in more detail. We finally investigate the applicability of these two methods to compute the power at interim of an ongoing post‐market trial. These results are expected to aid in the design and assessment of the required post‐market studies in terms of the level of evidence required for full approval. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is no coincidence that the reports of two meetings, one organized by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in March 2014, and the other by the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory (MHRA), in collaboration with ABPI (the Association of British Pharmaceutical Industry), in June 2014, have been published in tandem in CPT-PSP. Both reports deal with the same topic, namely, the impact of physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) in clinical drug development and the best practices for such applications. This reflects the transition of PBPK from academic curiosity to industrial norm, manifested by the regulatory agencies encouraging its use and receiving an increasing number of submissions containing PBPK models. The goal of both meetings was to help determine the need and facilitate the development of regulatory guidances on this subject within the conceptual framework of model informed drug development and regulatory decision-making. A further reflection of this intent is the publication by the European Medicines Agency of a Concept Paper on PBPK. One is reminded of a similar train of events surrounding the introduction of population PK/PD and nonlinear mixed effects modeling in the early-late 1990s, again with encouragement and receptivity of regulatory agencies leading to FDA guidance on the topic. Indeed, the intention of PBPK modeling and simulation is to complement other approaches, such as compartmental modeling, or, in some cases, replace them with a more mechanistic approach. PBPK models represent an important class of models that characterize absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion (ADME) processes and their underlying biological and physiological drivers. An increased understanding of these drivers and their unique interactions with drug substance and formulation factors provides critical insights into how drugs will behave in healthy volunteers and patients with disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Medical devices are equipment or products usually designed for medical use. They are controlled by national competent officials, but the European Medicines Agency (EMA) also participates in the evaluation of certain classifications of medical devices under European Union (EU) laws. EU has adopted new medical device regulation 2017/745, it has a transition period of 3 years and will be applied fully from 26 May 2020. During the transition period the manufacturer may place their device on the market in accordance with the latest regulations if they comply or in accordance with EU directives which are currently in force. Medical device regulations will be focusing on clinical evaluation and clinical investigation which ensure the device are safe and effective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The source control of pharmaceuticals involves influencing the everyday consumption volume and compound choice. This paper evaluates how source control contributes to protecting the environmental health and decreasing the investment needs in urban wastewater infrastructure. Different levels of reduction in diclofenac consumption (as recommended by the European Medicines Agency) compensated by equivalent increases in naproxen consumption (a less environmentally harmful compound) are evaluated. The different loads of compounds are fed into a microcontaminant fate and transport model of the Llobregat river basin (Spain) to assess the investment needs in tertiary treatment to reach diclofenac and naproxen concentrations below environmental quality standards. The results show that, despite the implementation of source control measures, tertiary treatment upgrades are still required in every scenario evaluated. Even though source control of pharmaceuticals decreases the investment needs in urban wastewater infrastructure, apparent concentrations reductions (i.e. statistically significant differences relative to the reference situation) are only observed in drastic substitutions of diclofenac by naproxen (a reduction in the total diclofenac consumption by 73% and a corresponding increase in naproxen consumption). The results also show that Spain is on good track with regards to the substitution of diclofenac by naproxen (among the top 5 in Europe), and this paper shows how positive this substitution can be for the environment. ga1 • We assess the substitution of diclofenac by naproxen as a source-control measure. • Source control of pharmaceuticals has a positive effect on freshwater ecosystems. • Investment needs for tertiary treatment are reduced. • Substitution at the UK level would lead to significant savings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since 2005, more than 40 new medicines for the treatment of type 2 diabetes have been introduced on the market. These consist of 15 new active substances establishing three new classes of non‐insulin products, and several new or modified insulin products and combinations. The approval of these products in Europe is regulated via the centralized procedure at the European Medicines Agency. Demonstration of benefit with regard to improved glucose control remains the principal outcome required from confirmatory studies to demonstrate efficacy. For the majority of these new medicines approved since 2005, cardiovascular outcome trials have now been completed, and have invariably supported the cardiovascular safety of these products. In some of these trials additional important benefits have been observed, for instance, a reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events and improvement of renal outcome. The existing regulatory framework and the continuous adaption of regulatory requirements to emerging developments will continue to guide the approval of new products in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To describe whether for the cardiovascular and antithrombotic medicines approved in the period 2006-2016 (a) the pivotal trial was designed with an upper ageexclusion criterion, (b) the age distribution of the participants in the registration trials reflected expected use, (c) post-authorisation studies were planned, and d) the age distribution of participants was clearly presented in the approval documents.Methods: The data provided to EMA in support of centralized marketing authorisations of were analysed.Results: Two out of 19 protocols excluded patients over 80 and 85 years old. In the heart failure, atrial fibrillation and antithrombotic drug registration trials, the proportion of patients aged 65-74 years was 33-50%, and 13-20% over 75 years. For antithrombotic drugs, it was 25-35% for the 65-74 age, and around 15% for the 75+ age. For statins and antihypertensives, it was 20-40% for the 65-74 age and 3-6% for 75+ age. Post-authorisation studies were planned in two cases. An improvement on the transparency of public data is apparent, although information is not always presented clearly and uniformly.Conclusions: There is more publicly available information since 2006, but data on older patients with frailty and multimorbidity are generally scant. To address this, CHMP Geriatric Expert Group has currently published a Reflection paper on physical frailty to support subgroup categorisation of older patients beyond age with the aim of ensuring that clinical trial populations are representative of the users of the medicine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The scope of this paper is to present a gold standard method to evaluate functional activity of antibody (Ab)-based materials during the different phases of their development, after their exposure to forced degradations or even during routine quality control. Ab-based materials play a central role in the development of diagnostic devices, for example, for screening or therapeutic target characterization, in formulation development, and in novel micro(nano)technology approaches to develop immunosensors useful for the analysis of trace substances in pharmaceutical and food industries, clinical and environmental fields. A very important aspect in diagnostic device development is the construction of its biofunctional surfaces. These Ab surfaces require biocompatibility, homogeneity, stability, specificity and functionality. Thus, this work describes the validation and applications of a unique ligand binding assay to directly perform the quantitative measurement of functional Ab binding sites immobilized on the solid surfaces. The method called Antibody Anti-HorseRadish Peroxidase (A2HRP) method, uses a covalently coated anti-HRP antibody (anti-HRP Ab) and does not need for a secondary Ab during the detection step. The A2HRP method was validated and gave reliable results over a wide range of absorbance values. Analyzed validation criteria were fulfilled as requested by the food and drug administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidance for the validation of bioanalytical methods with 1) an accuracy mean value within +15% of the nominal value; 2) the within-assay precision less than 7.1%, and 3) the inter-day variability under 12.1%. With the A2HRP method, it is then possible to quantify from 0.04 × 10 12 to 2.98 × 10 12 functional Ab binding sites immobilized on the solid surfaces. A2HRP method was validated according to FDA and EMA guidance, allowing the creation of a gold standard method to evaluate Ab surfaces for their resistance under laboratory constraints. Stability testing was described through forced degradation studies after exposure of Ab-surfaces to storage, pH and aqueous-organic solvent mixture stresses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have robust collaboration and dialogue around the need for data and the inclusion of pregnant and lactating individuals in clinical trials. Despite this collaboration, the two agencies have their own standards for the format and content of labeling for these populations. To understand these differences, the pregnancy and lactation labeling sections for 31 approved drugs were compared, and trends were assessed for use of language concordance and discordance related to use during pregnancy and lactation between the 2 agencies. Further analysis evaluated the presence of human data included in the labeling. The EMA and the FDA had high discordance between pregnancy and lactation labeling language, in 68% and 71% of labeling, respectively, and only 10% of pregnancy labeling and 16% of lactation labeling include human data. Concordance in labeling language is not the norm but occurs when there is a sizeable body of human data, animal data suggesting a particular safety issue, drug mechanism of action information, or disease‐specific considerations. This study highlights the need for more human data to inform prescribing decisions in these populations. The results also suggest that there is an opportunity for alignment in labeling across regions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prior to deployment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccines in the European Union in 2021, a high vaccine uptake leading to an unprecedented volume of safety data from spontaneous reports and real‐world evidence, was anticipated. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) implemented specific activities to ensure enhanced monitoring of emerging vaccine safety information, including intensive monitoring of reports of adverse events of special interest and the use of observed‐to‐expected analyses. The EMA also commissioned several independent observational studies using a large network of electronic healthcare databases and primary data collection via mobile and web‐based applications. This preparedness was key for two high‐profile safety signals: thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), a new clinical entity associated with adenovirus‐vectored vaccines, and myocarditis/pericarditis with messenger RNA vaccines. With no existing case definition nor background rates, the signal of TTS posed particular challenges. Nevertheless, it was rapidly identified, evaluated, contextualized and the risk minimized thanks to close surveillance and an efficient use of available evidence, clinical expertise and flexible regulatory tools. The two signals illustrated the complementarity between spontaneous and real‐world data, the former enabling rapid risk identification and communication, the latter enabling further characterization. The COVID‐19 pandemic has tremendously enhanced the development of tools and methods to harness the unprecedented volume of safety data generated for the vaccines. Areas for further improvement include the need for better and harmonized data collection across Member States (e.g., stratified vaccine exposure) to support signal evaluation in all population groups, risk contextualization, and safety communication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In accordance with European regulation, medicines containing a new active substance to treat neurodegenerative diseases as well as autoimmune and other immune dysfunctions must be approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) through the centralized procedure before they can be marketed. However, after EMA approval, each country is responsible for national market access, following the assessment performed by health technology assessment (HTA) bodies with regard to the therapeutic value. This study aims to provide a comparative analysis of HTA recommendations issued by three EU countries (France, Germany, and Italy) for new drugs for multiple sclerosis (MS) following EMA approval. In the reference period, we identified 11 medicines authorized in Europe for MS, including relapsing forms of MS (RMS; n = 4), relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS; n = 6), secondary progressive MS (SPMS; n = 1), and the primary progressive form (PPMS; n = 1). We found no agreement on the therapeutic value (in particular, the “added value” compared to the standard of care) of the selected drugs. Most evaluations resulted in the lowest score (“additional benefit not proven/no clinical improvement”), underlining the need for new molecules with better efficacy and safety profiles for MS, especially for some forms and clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) was recently approved by the European Medicines Agency for systemic treatment of moderateto-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Appropriate management of DMF treatment is required to achieve optimal clinical benefits. 7 dermatology experts gathered online for 3 meetings to identify consensus on the use of DMF in patient selection, drug dosage/titration, side effects management, and follow-up, with the aim to provide guidance on the use of DMF for psoriasis in clinical dermatological practice based on literature data and expert opinion. 20 statements were discussed and voted on using a facilitator-mediated modified Delphi methodology. Strong consensus was reached for all statements (agreement level of 100%). DMF treatment is characterized by dosage flexibility, sustained efficacy, high rates of drug survival, and low potential for drug-drug interactions. It can be used in a broad range of patients, including the elderly or those with comorbidities. Side effects (mainly gastrointestinal disorders, flushing, and lymphopenia) are frequently reported but are generally mild and transient and can be minimized by dosage adjustments and a slow titration schedule. Hematologic monitoring throughout the treatment course is required to reduce the risk of lymphopenia. This consensus document provides clinical dermatologists with answers on the optimal use of DMF to treat psoriasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The rapid and large-scale roll-out of new COVID-19 vaccines has led to unprecedented challenges in assessing vaccine safety. In 2021, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) processed about 1.7 million safety reports related to COVID-19 vaccines in the EudraVigilance (EV) database and identified more than 900 potential signals. Beyond the large amount of information to be processed, the evaluation of safety signals has faced several difficulties and limitations, both in the assessment of case reports and in the investigation of databases. The evaluation of a signal of corneal graft rejection (CGR) with Vaxzevria® was no exception to this. In this commentary, we present the challenges encountered in making regulatory decisions in the context of evolving evidence and knowledge. The pandemic crisis emphasised the importance of quick and proactive communication to address the many questions and, above all, to ensure the transparency of safety data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) used in oncology can induce severe and even fatal hepatotoxicity. Several PKIs are registered within a certain class to target a specific kinase. No systematic comparison of the reported hepatotoxicity and clinical guidance for monitoring and management of hepatotoxic events between the various PKI summaries of product characteristics (SmPC) is yet available. A systematic analysis of data on 21 hepatotoxicity parameters obtained from the SmPCs and European public assessment reports (EPARs) of European Medicines Agency‐approved antineoplastic PKIs (n = 55) has been conducted. The median reported incidence (range) of all grades of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevations was 16.9% (2.0%–86.4%) for PKI monotherapy, with 2.1% (0.0%–10.3%) being grade 3/4 and for all grades alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations 17.6% (2.0%–85.5%), with 3.0% (0.0%–25.0%) being grade 3/4. Fatalities due to hepatotoxicity were reported for 22 out of 47 PKIs (monotherapy) and for 5 out of 8 PKIs (combination therapy). A maximum grade of grade 4 and grade 3 hepatotoxicity was reported for 45% (n = 25) and 6% (n = 3), respectively. Liver parameter monitoring recommendations were present in 47 of the 55 SmPCs. Dose reductions were recommended for 18 PKIs. Discontinuation was recommended for patients meeting Hy's law criteria (16 out of 55 SmPCs). Severe hepatotoxic events are reported in approximately 50% of the analyzed SmPCs and EPARs. Differences in the degree of hepatotoxicity are apparent. Although liver parameter monitoring recommendations are present in the vast majority of the analyzed PKI SmPCs, the clinical guidance for hepatotoxicity was not standardized. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Concerns of the persistence and severity of the adverse effects of fluoroquinolones, mainly involving the nervous system, muscles and joints, resulted in the 2018 referral procedure led by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). They advised to stop prescribing fluoroquinolones for infections of mild severity or of a presumed self-limiting course and for prevention of infections, plus to restrict prescriptions in cases of milder infections where other treatment options are available, and restrict in at-risk populations. We aimed to examine whether the impact of EMA regulatory interventions implemented throughout 2018–2019 had an impact on fluoroquinolone prescribing rates. Methods: A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using electronic health care records from six European countries between 2016 and 2021. We analysed monthly incident fluoroquinolone use rates overall and for each fluoroquinolone active substance through flexible modelling via segmented regression to detect time points of trend changes, in monthly percentage change (MPC). Results: The incidence of fluoroquinolone use ranged from 0.7 to 8.0/1000 persons per month over all calendar years. While changes in fluoroquinolone prescriptions were observed over time across countries, these were inconsistent and did not seem to be temporally related to EMA interventions (e.g., Belgium: February/May 2018, MPC − 33.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] − 35.9 to − 30.7; Germany: February/May 2019, MPC − 12.6%, 95% CI − 13.7 to − 11.6]; UK: January/April 2016, MPC − 4.9%, 95% CI − 6.2 to − 3.6). Conclusion: The regulatory action associated with the 2018 referral did not seem to have relevant effects on fluoroquinolone prescribing in primary care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: SB11 (Byooviz™) is a ranibizumab biosimilar that acts as a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A inhibitor. Stability data for unopened SB11 vials at room temperature are limited and no data are available for SB11 withdrawn into syringes (in-use) for intravitreal administration. Methods: SB11 stability was assessed in two different settings: unopened vials stored at 30 ± 2 °C/65 ± 5% relative humidity (RH) for 2 months, and in-use SB11 withdrawn into syringes stored at 5 ± 3 °C for 98 days and then 25 ± 2 °C/60 ± 5% RH for 24 h. The product was stored in the absence of light, and the experimental design followed International Conference on Harmonization and European Medicines Agency requirements for stability evaluation of biological products. Analysis included visual appearance (color, clarity, and presence of visible particles), pH, protein concentration (A280) and purity (size-exclusion high-pressure liquid chromatography, capillary electrophoresis–sodium dodecyl sulfate, imaged capillary isoelectric focusing), biological activity (VEGF binding and neutralization), and safety (sub-visible particulates). Results: Except for charge variants in unopened vials at room temperature after 1 month by US standards, all results met the stability acceptance criteria (US and EU) for both unopened vials and for in-use SB11. There were no major changes in terms of physicochemical stability, biological activity and sub-visible particulates. Conclusion: SB11 was stable for longer periods and at higher temperatures than what is stated in the labels of the reference product (Lucentis) and SB11. The physicochemical properties, biological activity, and sub-visible particulates of SB11 in both tested settings (unopened vials at room temperature and in-use product withdrawn into syringes) were maintained under the described storage periods. This information can help to avoid unnecessary delays in patient treatment without any loss in quality and biological activity, lower the workload of health care providers and reduce costs associated with drug waste. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]