1. Prognostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcium in the PROMISE Study (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain)
- Author
-
Budoff, Matthew J, Mayrhofer, Thomas, Ferencik, Maros, Bittner, Daniel, Lee, Kerry L, Lu, Michael T, Coles, Adrian, Jang, James, Krishnam, Mayil, Douglas, Pamela S, and Hoffmann, Udo
- Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ,Clinical Sciences ,Heart Disease - Coronary Heart Disease ,Atherosclerosis ,Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities ,Cardiovascular ,Heart Disease ,Clinical Research ,4.2 Evaluation of markers and technologies ,Detection ,screening and diagnosis ,Aged ,Angina Pectoris ,Angina ,Unstable ,Comparative Effectiveness Research ,Computed Tomography Angiography ,Coronary Angiography ,Coronary Artery Disease ,Diagnosis ,Differential ,Disease Progression ,Dyspnea ,Echocardiography ,Stress ,Electrocardiography ,Exercise Test ,Female ,Hospitalization ,Humans ,Kaplan-Meier Estimate ,Male ,Middle Aged ,Multidetector Computed Tomography ,Myocardial Infarction ,North America ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Prognosis ,Proportional Hazards Models ,Prospective Studies ,Risk Factors ,Time Factors ,Vascular Calcification ,calcium ,coronary artery disease ,diagnostic tests ,routine ,prognosis ,PROMISE Investigators ,diagnostic tests ,routine ,Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology ,Public Health and Health Services ,Cardiovascular System & Hematology ,Cardiovascular medicine and haematology ,Clinical sciences ,Sports science and exercise - Abstract
BackgroundCoronary artery calcium (CAC) is an established predictor of future major adverse atherosclerotic cardiovascular events in asymptomatic individuals. However, limited data exist as to how CAC compares with functional testing (FT) in estimating prognosis in symptomatic patients.MethodsIn the PROMISE trial (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain), patients with stable chest pain (or dyspnea) and intermediate pretest probability for obstructive coronary artery disease were randomized to FT (exercise electrocardiography, nuclear stress, or stress echocardiography) or anatomic testing. We evaluated those who underwent CAC testing as part of the anatomic evaluation (n=4209) and compared that with results of FT (n=4602). We stratified CAC and FT results as normal or mildly, moderately, or severely abnormal (for CAC: 0, 1-99 Agatston score [AS], 100-400 AS, and >400 AS, respectively; for FT: normal, mild=late positive treadmill, moderate=early positive treadmill or single-vessel ischemia, and severe=large ischemic region abnormality). The primary end point was all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or unstable angina hospitalization over a median follow-up of 26.1 months. Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and C statistics to determine predictive and discriminatory values.ResultsOverall, the distribution of normal or mildly, moderately, or severely abnormal test results was significantly different between FT and CAC (FT: normal, n=3588 [78.0%]; mild, n=432 [9.4%]; moderate, n=217 [4.7%]; severe, n=365 [7.9%]; CAC: normal, n=1457 [34.6%]; mild, n=1340 [31.8%]; moderate, n=772 [18.3%]; severe, n=640 [15.2%]; P0), whereas fewer than half of events occurred in patients with mildly, moderately, or severely abnormal FT (n=57 of 132, 43%; P
- Published
- 2017