Search

Transmission of drug-resistant viruses has been shown to be associated with lower virus replication capacity and higher CD4+ cell counts in recent human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seroconvertors. The impact of drug resistance mutations on CD4 cell counts in chronically HIV-infected patients has not been examined. A total of 825 patients whose plasma specimens were submitted to a reference laboratory for genotypic testing from 1999 to 2002 were analyzed. There was no significant difference in the median CD4+ cell count when comparing 63 drug-naive and 762 treatment-experienced patients [399 (IQR, 141-525) vs. 319 (IQR, 174-521); P = 0.8]. In contrast, the median viral load was significantly higher in drug-naive than in pre-treated patients [4.6 (IQR, 4.1-5.25) vs. 4.1 (IQR, 3.4-4.7) logs; P < 0.0001]. Overall, drug resistance mutations appeared in 81% of patients, with a median number of 9 (IQR, 5-14). The rate of drug resistance genotypes was 9.5% for drug-naive patients and 86.7% for pre-treated individuals. In the univariate analysis, a lower viral load (P < 0.0001), the presence of drug-resistant viruses (P = 0.038), and specific mutations in the reverse transcriptase (RT) gene [presence of M184V (P = 0.016) or K70R (P < 0.0001), and lack of L74V (P < 0.003)] were all associated with higher CD4+ counts. However, in the multivariate analyses, only a lower viral load and the presence of K70R were significantly associated with higher CD4+ cell counts. In summary, drug-resistant viruses are associated with lower viral loads, but after adjusting for plasma viremia, subjects carrying drug-resistant viruses do not show significantly higher CD4 cell counts. Thus, keeping on treatment HIV-infected individuals failing virologically and harboring drug-resistant viruses may ameliorate their immunological deterioration until new drugs became available., (Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

We examined the influence of both efavirenz plasma concentrations and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase (NNRTI) resistance mutations on the antiviral activity of efavirenz in patients experiencing early virological failure under nevirapine-containing regimens. Up to 41% of patients reach less than 50 copies/ml at 48 weeks. No association was found between the presence of NNRTI resistance mutations and virological outcome. Nevertheless, patients responding virologically and carrying NNRTI-resistant viruses had higher efavirenz levels than those who did not respond.

Background: The transmission of drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is a matter of major concern, because it could compromise the response to antiretroviral therapy., Material and Methods: From 1997 through 2003, genotypic drug resistance profiles in 89 patients with recent HIV-1 seroconversion were compared in a case-control study with HIV-1 genotypes obtained from 520 subjects identified at Hospital Carlos III in Madrid, Spain, as "potential transmitters" of drug-resistant virus. This group consisted of HIV-infected patients experiencing virologic failure of antiretroviral therapy., Results: Drug resistance mutations were recognized in 15 (16.8%) of 89 patients with recent HIV-1 seroconversion (the seroconverter group), providing resistance to nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in 14.6%, nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) in 3.4%, and protease inhibitors (PIs) in 3.4%. Among individuals who were potential transmitters of HIV-1 (the potential transmitter group), drug resistance mutations were found in 80%, providing resistance to NRTIs in 73.7%, NNRTIs in 36.4%, and PIs in 38.7%. The estimated ratio of individuals with recent HIV-1 seroconversion to potential transmitters for drug-resistance genotypes was 0.23 for resistance to NRTIs, 0.09 for resistance to NNRTIs, and 0.09 for resistance to PIs. For specific resistance mutations, the ratio of individuals with recent HIV-1 seroconversion to potential transmitters was 0.18 for 41L, 0.20 for 215Y/F (including revertants), 0.06 for 184V, 0.04 for 103N, and 0.14 for 181C when considering drug resistance mutations in the reverse transcriptase (RT) gene; the ratio was 0.12 for 46L, 0.06 for 82A/T/S, and 0.08 for 90L, when examining PI resistance mutations., Conclusion: Strains of HIV with some drug resistance genotypes (41L, 215Y/F, and 181C in the RT gene and 46L in the protease gene) may be more efficiently transmitted than strains with other drug resistance mutations (184V and 103N in the RT gene and 82A/S/T and 90M in the protease gene).

Drug resistance testing provides useful information for managing HIV-infected patients. Phenotyping could add complementary information to genotyping and occasionally be more useful, although is less available to clinicians. Large paired geno-pheno databases have allowed the prediction of phenotypes from genotypes. However, the accuracy of these virtual phenotypes (vPT) in a clinical setting has not been well assessed yet. We analyzed the concordance between vPT and interpreted genotype (GT) in 105 samples belonging to treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients. A high concordance was seen when examining both non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) and protease inhibitors (PI) (r = 0.95 either), while it was lower for nucleoside analogs (r = 0.79). The drugs with lower concordance were abacavir (71.1%), tenofovir (71.5%) and didanosine (71.9%). In 20% of specimens (21/105), the vPT did not provide results for all approved drugs. These were mainly samples with a high number of drug resistance mutations or rare genotypes, which seem to be underepresented in the VircoNET database. Overall, there is good correlation between vPT/GT, especially for PI and NNRTI. The inclusion of additional sequences in the VircoNET database, mainly those derived from heavily treatment-experienced patients and/or from patients failing the most recently approved drugs might improve its performance.

Background: Atazanavir (ATV) is the latest approved HIV protease inhibitor (PI). Even though it is very convenient (only two capsules once a day), concerns have risen about its potency., Method: The clinical performance of ATV 400 mg once a day was examined in all PI-experienced patients who were included in the ATV expanded access program conducted in a single institution. The predictive value of baseline drug resistance HIV genotypes, ATV plasma trough levels, and the genotypic inhibitory quotient (GIQ) on the virological response at week 24 was assessed., Results: Data from 92 patients were analyzed. ATV was prescribed as part of a rescue intervention (45%), a simplification strategy (11%), or an attempt to ameliorate hyperlipidemias (23%) or other toxicities (16%). Tenofovir (TDF) was concomitantly used with ATV in 78% of patients. None received ritonavir boosting. In patients with detectable viremia at baseline (65%), the median HIV RNA drop was 0.7 logs. The median ATV Cmin was 0.12 microg/mL (IQR, 0.05-0.22 microg/mL), which is clearly above the IC90 (90% inhibitory concentration) for ATV in wild-type viruses. The virological response did not correlate significantly with ATV Cmin. The median number of protease resistance mutations was lower in patients showing virological response than in nonresponders (1 vs. 5; p=.07). A higher HIV RNA drop was associated with a higher GIQ (p=.02; beta=-5.4; 95% CI, -10 to -1). Only 4 patients (4%) discontinued treatment due to ATV-related toxicities (hyperbilirubinemia in 1). Bilirubin levels were associated with ATV plasma concentrations (p=.05; beta=3.2; 95% CI, -0.1 to 6.5). The rate of hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia declined significantly with respect to baseline., Conclusion: ATV is relatively safe and provides significant virological response in PI-experienced patients, mainly among those with a low number of protease resistance mutations. The GIQ predicts accurately the virological response in patients receiving ATV. Hyperbilirubinemia is associated with higher ATV plasma levels.

The predictive value of virological response to lopinavir (LPV)/ritonavir (r) was assessed in 126 HIV-infected patients who failed antiretroviral therapy and had begun a rescue intervention based on LPV/r. At 3 months, subjects with < or =6 protease (PRO) resistance mutations showed a higher rate of virological response (HIV-RNA drop > 1 log or to <50 copies/ml) than patients with >6 PRO resistance mutations (77% versus 48%; p = 0.01). On the other hand, virological responders had greater mean LPV plasma trough levels than nonresponders (6.4 versus 3.9 microg/ml; p = 0.02). A positive correlation was found between LPV trough concentration and viral load reductions at 3 months under LPV/r (r = 0.23; p = 0.017). Overall, virological response was seen in 80.8% of patients with LPV trough levels >4.8 microg/ml while in only 52.5% of patients with lower LPV trough concentrations (p = 0.002). In the multivariate analysis, both < or =6 PRO resistance mutations and LPV trough levels >4.8 microg/ml were independent predictors of virological response to salvage therapy with LPV/r. A genotypic inhibitory quotient (GIQ) was estimated for each patient based on the ratio between LPV trough levels and the number of PRO resistance mutations. A positive strong correlation was found between GIQ and viral load reductions (r = 0.42; p = 0.002). Virological response was seen in 78% of patients with a GIQ >0.7 but only in 41.6% of those with lower GIQ (p = 0.004). When LPV trough levels >4.8 microg/ml, PRO resistance mutations < or =6, and GIQ >0.7 were all included in a stepwise multivariate analysis, GIQ remained as the main independent predictor of response to LPV/r.

Background: Multiple resistance to nucleoside analogs mediated by the Q151M complex and/or codon 67-69 inserts/deletions represents a growing problem among HIV-infected persons, most of whom have been exposed to sequential therapies for long periods of time., Patients and Method: All plasma samples collected from HIV-infected patients failing antiretroviral therapy and referred for HIV genotyping to our institution during the last 3 years were examined. Genetic analysis of the reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease (PR) genes was performed using an automatic sequencer., Results: Multinucleoside-resistance (MNR) genotypes were recognized in 22 (2.9%) of 761 participants. Twelve of them carried the Q151M complex and 9 harbored different codon 67-69 inserts. One participant carried a deletion at codon 67 of the RT gene. All patients with MNR viruses had been exposed to nucleoside analogs for a median of 54 months (range, 19-96). The mean plasma HIV RNA at the time MNR was first identified was 4.62 log and the mean CD4 count was 227 cells/microL. All patients with MNR viruses except two began salvage therapies based on protease inhibitors (PIs). Overall, 54.5% (12/22) of participants showed a significant virologic response (defined as >1 log reduction in plasma HIV RNA). Seven of them reached <50 copies/mL and remained with undetectable viremia for a median of 17 months (range, 8-50). No differences were found when patients with Q151M and codon 67-69 rearrangements were compared. The only predictor of response was the inclusion of ritonavir-boosted PI in the salvage regimen. In all patients with virologic failure, MNR genotypes have persisted over time., Conclusion: The prevalence of viruses with MNR genotypes is currently low (approximately 3%) among HIV-infected patients failing antiretroviral therapy. The expected poor prognosis of patients harboring MNR viruses may often be overcome using rescue interventions based on potent ritonavir-boosted PI combinations.

Virological failure under protease inhibitor (PI)-based antiretroviral regimens is often not explained by the selection of resistance mutations. The role of low indinavir (IDV) plasma levels in treatment failure was assessed in 46 subjects experiencing early virological failure to a first-line IDV-containing triple combination. Overall, 69% of patients showed subtherapeutic IDV plasma levels (it was not detected at all in 75% of them). Subjects with detectable but suboptimal IDV levels developed more IDV resistance mutations. Thus, drug monitoring may be useful to assess treatment adherence and risk of drug resistance in early virological failures. This information may be crucial for choosing the most appropriate rescue intervention.

Background: Resistance to antiretroviral (ARV) drugs represents a major obstacle to the success of HIV therapy. The aim of the study was to examine the prevalence of genotypic resistance to ARV drugs in a large group of HIV-infected individuals incarcerated in penal facilities., Material/methods: We analyzed the reverse transcriptase and protease genes on plasma samples collected from 309 HIV-infected prison inmates in Madrid. In order to compare the prevalence of resistance at different periods and detect any trend over time, half of the samples from ARV-naive and half from pre-treated subjects were randomly collected in 1999 and in 2001., Results: Overall, 63.7% of specimens harbored plasma HIV-RNA above 1000 copies/ml. Genotypic data were obtained in 94.4% of them. Primary resistance mutations among 127 drug-naive subjects were recognized in 13% in 1999 vs. 15% in 2001. In contrast, drug resistance was found in 35% and 59% of 182 pre-treated subjects in 1999 and 2001., Conclusions: Drug resistance has increased over the last two years among inmates on ARV drugs and currently affects 59% of those failing treatment. A nearly 3-fold increase has been noticed for NNRTI resistance. In comparison with HIV-positive subjects outside jail on ARV drugs, prisoners are more likely to experience virological failure, but show a lower rate of drug resistance; this affects particularly drugs with a low genetic barrier (i.e. NNRTI and 3TC).

The knowledge of which drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) genotypes are the most prevalent in a community may be helpful for designing the best salvage regimens. A total of 540 individuals on antiretroviral therapy attending 18 different outclinics in Spain were examined in a cross-sectional study conducted during June 2000. The overall rate of virologic failure (>50 HIV RNA copies/ml) was 54%. Among the subjects showing treatment failure, 79% harbored resistant HIV genotypes, 77% showed resistance to nucleoside analogues, 53% showed resistance to protease inhibitors, and 42% showed resistance to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Overall, 78.5% of individuals harbored HIV strains which showed resistance to two or more drug classes. Moreover, nucleotide substitutions causing broad cross-resistance among compounds within each drug family were quite common. These findings suggest that drug resistance mutations are very prevalent among subjects who have experienced several treatment failures. Therefore, facilitating the arrival of compounds belonging to new drug classes should be considered a priority.

HIV resistance to antiretroviral agents involves the selection of mutations within the reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease (PRO) genes, that result in structural changes causing in most instances a loss of affinity of RT and PRO inhibitors for their respective targets. Then, the inhibitory competition caused by these molecules in respect to the physiologic substrates of the RT and PRO enzymes is lost. For nucleoside analogs, a second mechanism of resistance involves the removal of the chain terminators (pyrophosphorolisis) and is caused by the classical AZT-resistance mutations. Complex interactions between drug resistance mutations make difficult how to interpret and predict the benefit of antiretroviral agents in the clinical arena. However, for most antiretroviral agents, resistance is not a dichotomic situation but rather a relatively continuous phenomenon, in which some partial activity of compounds is found even in the face of drug resistance mutations. Based in this fact, resistance to PRO inhibitors may be overcome when plasma levels of PRO inhibitors are boosted using low doses of ritonavir.

Genotypic resistance to antiretroviral drugs was examined in 684 individuals attending 18 outpatient clinics distributed across Spain in June 2000. Compared with similar surveys conducted before 1998, the prevalence of resistance to nucleosides has declined significantly among naive chronic HIV carriers. In contrast, resistance among pre-treated patients has increased; resistance to all three drug families having been recognized in nearly a quarter of patients.