Search

Your search keyword '"Geelen, Anouk"' showing total 16 results

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Author "Geelen, Anouk" Remove constraint Author: "Geelen, Anouk" Topic diet surveys Remove constraint Topic: diet surveys
16 results on '"Geelen, Anouk"'

Search Results

1. Using enhanced regression calibration to combine dietary intake estimates from 24 h recall and FFQ reduces bias in diet-disease associations.

2. The Maastricht FFQ: Development and validation of a comprehensive food frequency questionnaire for the Maastricht study.

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources

3. Importance of details in food descriptions in estimating population nutrient intake distributions.

4. Validating fatty acid intake as estimated by an FFQ: how does the 24 h recall perform as reference method compared with the duplicate portion?

5. A national FFQ for the Netherlands (the FFQ-NL1.0): development and compatibility with existing Dutch FFQs.

6. A National Dietary Assessment Reference Database (NDARD) for the Dutch Population: Rationale behind the Design.

7. A systematic review of methods to assess intake of sugar-sweetened beverages among healthy European adults and children: a DEDIPAC (DEterminants of DIet and Physical Activity) study.

8. BMI was found to be a consistent determinant related to misreporting of energy, protein and potassium intake using self-report and duplicate portion methods.

9. A systematic review of methods to assess intake of fruits and vegetables among healthy European adults and children: a DEDIPAC (DEterminants of DIet and Physical Activity) study.

10. A national FFQ for the Netherlands (the FFQ-NL 1.0): validation of a comprehensive FFQ for adults.

11. Comparison of duplicate portion and 24 h recall as reference methods for validating a FFQ using urinary markers as the estimate of true intake.

12. The Dutch Healthy Diet index (DHD-index): an instrument to measure adherence to the Dutch Guidelines for a Healthy Diet.

13. Design aspects of 24 h recall assessments may affect the estimates of protein and potassium intake in dietary surveys.

14. Uncertainty in intake due to portion size estimation in 24-hour recalls varies between food groups.

15. Two non-consecutive 24 h recalls using EPIC-Soft software are sufficiently valid for comparing protein and potassium intake between five European centres--results from the European Food Consumption Validation (EFCOVAL) study.

16. Reporting accuracy of population dietary sodium intake using duplicate 24 h dietary recalls and a salt questionnaire.