Search

Preclinical Research & Development The addition of polyunsaturated fatty acids to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can increase their antinociceptive activity and produce a gastroprotective effect. The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of the interaction between docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and diclofenac on inflammation (fixed ratios 1:1, 1:3, and 3:1), nociception (fixed ratio 1:3), and gastric injury in rats. DHA, diclofenac, or combinations of DHA and diclofenac produced anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive effects in rat. The administration of diclofenac produced significant gastric damage, but this effect was not observed with either DHA or the DHA-diclofenac combinations. Effective dose (ED 30 ) values were estimated for each individual drug and analyzed isobolographically. The anti-inflammatory experimental ED 30 values were 6.97 mg/kg (1:1 fixed ratio), 1.1 mg/kg (1:3 fixed ratio), and 11.34 mg/kg (3:1 fixed ratio). These values were significantly lower (p < .05) than the theoretical ED 30 values: 67.94 mg/kg (1:1), 35.37 mg/kg (1:3), and 100.51 mg/kg (3:1). The antinociceptive experimental value was 1.25 mg/kg (1:3 fixed ratio). This value was lower (p < .05) than the theoretical ED 30 , which was predicted to be 15.92 mg/kg. These data indicate that the DHA-diclofenac combinations interact at the systemic level, produce minor gastric damage, and potentially have therapeutic advantages for the clinical treatment of inflammatory pain., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Preclinical Research & Development The combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with herbal products having analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects may increase their beneficial effects and limit their side effects. In this study, the effects of an interaction between α-bisabolol and the NSAID, diclofenac on nociception (formalin test), inflammation (paw inflammation produced by carrageenan) and gastric injury in rat was assessed. Diclofenac, α-bisabolol, or diclofenac-α-bisabolol combinations produced antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects in rat (p < .05). The systemic administration of diclofenac, but not α-bisabolol, produced gastric damage while the diclofenac-α-bisabolol combinations produced limited gastric damage. Effective dose (ED 40 ) values were determined for each individual drug and analyzed isobolographically. The theoretical ED 40 values for the antinociceptive (98.89 mg/kg) and the anti-inflammatory (41.2 mg/kg) effects differed from the experimental ED 40 values (antinociception: 38.7 mg/kg and anti-inflammation: 13.4 mg/kg). We concluded that the interactions between diclofenac and α-bisabolol are synergistic. These data suggest that the diclofenac-α-bisabolol combinations can interact to produce minor gastric damage, thereby offering a safer therapeutic alternative for the clinical management of inflammation and/or inflammatory pain., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Preclinical Research The coadministration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with medicinal plant extracts may increase anti-inflammatory activity, thus permitting the use of lower NSAID doses and limiting the side effects. The aim of this study was to explore the interactions between an ethanolic extract of M. chamomilla extract (MCE) with two NSAIDs, diclofenac and indomethacin on carrageenan-induced paw inflammation and gastric injury in rats. Diclofenac, indomethacin and MCE, or combinations with MCE produced an anti-inflammatory effect. Effective dose (ED) values were estimated for the individual drugs, and isobolograms were constructed. The final experimental ED values were 483.7 mg/kg for diclofenac + MCE combination, and 212.6 mg/kg for indomethacin + MCE. These values were lower (p < 0.05) than the theoretical ED values (1186.9 mg/kg for diclofenac + MCE combination, and 1183.8 mg/kg for indomethacin + MCE). These data suggest that the interactions between NSAIDs and MCE that mediate the anti-inflammatory effects at the systemic level are synergistic and may have therapeutic advantages for the clinical treatment of inflammatory processes. Drug Dev Res 78 : 360-367, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Experiments using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) alone have produced limited antinociceptive effects in animal models. For this reason, the number of studies involving the administration of NSAIDs along with an adjuvant drug harboring different mechanisms of action has increased enormously. Here, combinations of diclofenac and pyrilamine were used to determine their influence on nociception (formalin test), inflammation (paw inflammation produced by carrageenan), and gastric damage in rodents. Diclofenac, pyrilamine, or combinations of diclofenac and pyrilamine produced antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects in the rat. The systemic administration of diclofenac alone and in combination with pyrilamine produced significant gastric damage. Effective dose (ED) values were determined for each individual drug, and isobolograms were prepared. The theoretical ED values for the antinociceptive (systemic, 35.4 mg/kg; local, 343.4 μg/paw) and the anti-inflammatory (37.9 mg/kg) effects differed significantly from the experimental ED values (systemic antinociception, 18.1 mg/kg; local antinociception, 183.3 μg/paw; anti-inflammation, 10.6 mg/kg). Therefore, it was concluded that the interactions between diclofenac and pyrilamine are synergistic. The data suggest that the diclofenac-pyrilamine combinations can interact at the systemic and local peripheral levels, thereby offering a therapeutic alternative for the clinical management of inflammatory pain.

Chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L., Asteraceae) is a medicinal plant widely used as remedy for pain and gastric disorders. The association of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with medicinal plant extracts may increase its antinociceptive activity, permit the use of lower doses and limit side effects. The aim was to isolate and identify the main chemical constituents of Matricaria chamomilla ethanolic extract (MCE) as well as to explore their activity as cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors in silico; besides, to examine the interaction between MCE and diclofenac on nociception in the formalin test by isobolographic analysis, and to determine the level of gastric injury in rats. Three terpenoids, α-bisabolol, bisabolol oxide A, and guaiazulene, were isolated and identified by (1)H NMR. Docking simulation predicted COX inhibitory activity for those terpenoids. Diclofenac, MCE, or their combinations produced an antinociceptive effect. The sole administration of diclofenac and the highest combined dose diclofenac-MCE produced significant a gastric damage, but that effect was not seen with MCE alone. An isobologram was constructed and the derived theoretical ED35 for the antinociceptive effect was significantly different from the experimental ED35; hence, the interaction between diclofenac and MCE that mediates the antinociceptive effect is synergist. The MCE contains three major terpenoids with plausible COX inhibitory activity in silico, but α-bisabolol showed the highest affinity. Data suggest that the diclofenac-MCE combination can interact at the systemic level in a synergic manner and may have therapeutic advantages for the clinical treatment of inflammatory pain., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The association of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with certain plant extracts can increase antinociceptive activity, permitting the use of lower doses and thus limiting side effects. Therefore, the aim objective of the current study was to examine the effects of curcumin on the nociception and pharmacokinetics of diclofenac in rats. Antinociception was assessed using the formalin test. Diluted formalin was injected subcutaneously into the dorsal surface of the right hind paw. Nociceptive behavior was quantified as the number of flinches of the injected paw during 60 min after injection, and a reduction in formalin-induced flinching was interpreted as an antinociceptive response. Rats were treated with oral diclofenac (1-31 mg/kg), curcumin (3.1-100 mg/kg) or the diclofenac-curcumin combination (2.4-38.4 mg/kg). To determine the possibility of a pharmacokinetic interaction, the oral bioavailability of diclofenac (10 mg/kg) was studied in presence and the absence of curcumin (31 mg/kg). Diclofenac, curcumin, or diclofenac-curcumin combination produced an antinociceptive effect on the formalin test. ED30 values were estimated for the individual drugs, and an isobologram was constructed. The derived theoretical ED30 for the antinociceptive effect (19.2 mg/kg) was significantly different from the observed experimental ED30 value (9.8 mg/kg); hence, the interaction between diclofenac and curcumin that mediates the antinociceptive effect was synergistic. Notwithstanding, the interaction does not appear to involve pharmacokinetic mechanisms, as oral curcumin failed to produce any significant alteration in oral diclofenac bioavailability. Data suggest that the diclofenac-curcumin combination can interact at the systemic level and may have therapeutic advantages for the clinical treatment of inflammatory pain., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is evidence that biguanides and sulfonylureas block diclofenac-induced antinociception (DIA) in rat models. However, little is known about the interaction between these hypoglycemics with respect to DIA., Objective: To determine whether metformin-sulfonylurea combinations affect DIA during the formalin test., Methods: Rats received the appropriate vehicle or diclofenac before 1% formaldehyde was injected into the paw. Rats were also pretreated with vehicle, glibenclamide, glipizide, metformin or glibenclamide⁄metformin and glipizide⁄metformin combinations before the diclofenac and formaldehyde injections, and the effect on antinociception was assessed. Isobolograms of the combinations were constructed to test for a synergistic interaction., Results: Systemic injection of diclofenac resulted in antinociception during the second phase of the test. Systemic pretreatment with the combinations of glibenclamide (0.56 mg⁄kg to 10 mg⁄kg)⁄metformin (10 mg⁄kg to 180 mg⁄kg) and glipizide (0.56 mg⁄kg to10 mg⁄kg)⁄metformin (10 mg⁄kg to 180 mg⁄kg) blocked DIA. The derived theoretical effective doses for 50% of subjects (ED50) for the glibenclamide⁄metformin and glipizide⁄metformin combinations were 32.52 mg⁄kg and 32.42 mg⁄kg, respectively, and were significantly higher than the actual observed experimental ED50 values (7.57 mg⁄kg and 8.43 mg⁄kg, respectively)., Conclusion: Pretreatment with glibenclamide, glipizide or metformin blocked DIA in a dose-dependent manner, and combining either sulfonylurea with metformin produced even greater effects. The observed ED50s for the combinations were approximately fourfold lower than the calculated additive effects. These data indicate that sulfonylureas interact to produce antagonism of DIA. Combination therapy is a common second-line treatment for patients with diabetes and metabolic syndrome, a group that experiences pain from multiple sources. The results suggest that at least some anti-inflammatory agents may not be effective in this group.

The model-based approach was undertaken to characterize the interaction between the peripheral and central antinociceptive effects exerted by lumiracoxib. The effects of intraplantar and intrathecal administrations and of fixed ratio combinations of lumiracoxib simultaneously administered by these two routes were evaluated using the formalin test in rats. Pain-related behavior data, quantified as the number of flinches of the injected paw, were analyzed using a population approach with NONMEM 7. The pain response during the first phase of the formalin test, which was insensitive to lumiracoxib, was modeled using a monoexponential decay. The second phase, which was sensitive to lumiracoxib, was described incorporating synthesis and degradation processes of pain mediators that were recruited locally after tissue injury. Upregulation at the local level and in the central nervous system (CNS) was set to be proportional to the predicted levels of pain mediators in the local (injured) compartment. Results suggest a greater role of upregulated COX-2(Local) in generating the pain response compared to COX-2(CNS). Drug effects were described as inhibition of upregulated COX-2. The model adequately described the time course of nociception after formalin injection in the absence or presence of lumiracoxib administered locally and/or spinally. Data suggest that the overall response is the additive outcome of drug effects at the peripheral and central compartments, with predominance of peripheral mechanisms. Application of modeling opens new perspectives for understanding the overall mechanism of action of analgesic drugs.

Aims: Recent evidence has shown that systemic administration of sulfonylureas and biguanides block the diclofenac-induced antinociception, but not the effect produced by indomethacin. However, there are no reports about the peripheral interaction between analgesics and the biguanides metformin and phenformin. Therefore, this work was undertaken to determine whether glibenclamide and glipizide and the biguanides metformin and phenformin have any effect on the peripheral antinociception induced by diclofenac and indomethacin., Main Methods: Diclofenac and indomethacin were administered locally in the formalin-injured rat paw, and the antinociceptive effect was evaluated using the 1% formalin test. To determine whether peripheral antinociception induced by diclofenac or indomethacin was mediated by either the ATP-sensitive K(+) channels or biguanides-induced mechanisms, the effect of pretreatment with the appropriates vehicles or glibenclamide, glipizide, metformin and phenformin on the antinociceptive effect induced by local peripheral diclofenac and indomethacin was assessed., Key Findings: Local peripheral injections of diclofenac (50-200 μg/paw) and indomethacin (200-800 μg/paw) produced a dose-dependent antinociception during the second phase of the test. Local pretreatment with glibenclamide, glipizide, metformin and phenformin blocked the diclofenac-induced antinociception. On the other hand, the pretreatment with glibenclamide and glipizide did not prevent the local antinociception produced by indomethacin. Nonetheless, metformin and phenformin reversed the local antinociception induced by indomethacin., Significance: Data suggest that diclofenac could activate the K(+) channels and biguanides-dependent mechanisms to produce its peripheral antinociceptive effects in the formalin test. Likewise, a biguanides-dependent mechanism could be activated by indomethacin consecutively to generate its peripheral antinociceptive effect., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

There is evidence that administration of sulfonylureas, such as glibenclamide and tolbutamide, blocks diclofenac-induced antinociception, suggesting that diclofenac activates ATP-sensitive K(+) channels. However, there is no evidence for the interaction between diclofenac and other hypoglycemic drugs, such as the biguanides metformin or phenformin. Therefore, this work was undertaken to determine whether two sulfonylureas, glibenclamide and glipizide, as well as two biguanides, metformin and phenformin, have any effect on the systemic antinociception that is induced by diclofenac and indomethacin using the rat formalin test as an animal model. Systemic injections of diclofenac (10 to 30mg/kg) and indomethacin (10 to 30mg/kg) produced dose-dependent antinociception during the second phase of the test. Systemic pretreatment with glibenclamide (3 and 10mg/kg), glipizide (3 and 10mg/kg), metformin (100 and 180mg/kg) or phenformin (100 and 180mg/kg) blocked diclofenac-induced systemic antinociception in the second phase of the test (P<0.05). In contrast, pretreatment with glibenclamide, glipizide, metformin or phenformin did not block indomethacin-induced systemic antinociception (P>0.05). These data suggest that diclofenac, but not indomethacin, activated K(+) channels and metformin and phenformin-dependent mechanisms, which resulted in systemic antinociceptive effects in the rat formalin test., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: This study establishes a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model to describe the time course and in vivo mechanisms of action of the antinociceptive effects of lumiracoxib, evaluated by the thermal hyperalgesia test in rats., Experimental Approach: Female Wistar fasted rats were injected s.c. with saline or carrageenan in the right hind paw, followed by either 0, 1, 3, 10 or 30 mg*kg(-1) of oral lumiracoxib at the time of carrageenan injection (experiment I), or 0, 10 or 30 mg*kg(-1) oral lumiracoxib at 4 h after carrageenan injection (experiment II). Antihyperalgesic responses were measured as latency time (LT) to a thermal stimulus. PK/PD modelling of the antinociceptive response was performed using the population approach with NONMEM VI., Results: A two-compartment model described the plasma disposition. A first-order model, including lag time and decreased relative bioavailability as a function of the dose, described the absorption process. The response model was: LT=LT(0)/(1 +MED). LT(0) is the baseline response, and MED represents the level of inflammatory mediators. The time course of MED was assumed to be equivalent to the predicted profile of COX-2 activity and was modelled according to an indirect response model with a time variant synthesis rate. Drug effects were described as a reversible inhibition of the COX-2 activity. The in vivo estimate of the dissociation equilibrium constant of the COX-2-lumiracoxib complex was 0.24 microg*mL(-1)., Conclusions: The model developed appropriately described the time course of pharmacological responses to lumiracoxib, in terms of its mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics.

Tissue degeneration, infection, inflammation, cancer, trauma, surgery and limb fractures all produce pain. Each of these physiological abnormalities requires a therapeutic approach different from the last. In acute pain, caused by fracture, several classes of analgesics have been utilized. These basic remedies for analgesia, however, are still confined to a small number of medications, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), local anesthetics and opioids. In addition, most of these drugs have side effects, limiting their use in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of three NSAIDs to relief acute pain caused by ankle fracture. Sixty subjects with ankle fracture were randomized to receive ketorolac, diclofenac, or etoricoxib, every 12 hours in a prospective, double-blind study. Forty-nine patients completed the study. The subjects' assessments of ankle pain on the visual analog scale and a Likert scale showed a significant reduction from baseline over 24 hr, regardless the treatment group. All treatments showed a similar profile in pain reduction. Etoricoxib, diclofenac and ketorolac twice daily are a rapid and effective treatment for acute pain. All the regimens were well tolerated in this study.

Heliopsis longipes is an herbaceous plant found in Mexico, used traditionally for its analgesic and anesthetic activities. Plant extracts in combined use with synthetic drugs may represent a therapeutic advantage for the clinical treatment of pain, allowing the use of lower doses, and limiting side-effects. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to determine the possible pharmacological interaction between Heliopsis longipes ethanolic extract (HLEE) and diclofenac in the Hargreaves model of thermal hyperalgesia in the mouse. HLEE, diclofenac or fixed-dose ratio HLEE-diclofenac combinations were administered systemically to mice and the antihyperalgesic effect was evaluated using the thermal hyperalgesia test. All treatments produced a dose-dependent antihyperalgesic effect. ED(30) values were estimated for all the treatments and an isobologram was constructed. The derived theoretical ED(30) value for the HLEE-diclofenac combination was 54.4+/-9.4 mg/kg body wt, significantly higher than the actually observed experimental ED(30) value, 8.6+/-4.0 mg/kg body wt. This result corresponds to synergistic interaction between HLEE and diclofenac in the Hargreaves model of thermal hyperalgesia. Data suggest that low doses of the HLEE-diclofenac combination can interact synergistically at the systemic level and that this association may therefore represent a therapeutic advantage for the clinical treatment of inflammatory pain.

A novel topical ophthalmic formulation of the preferential COX-2 inhibitor meloxicam has recently been developed. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this novel 0.03% meloxicam solution with regard to a reference 0.1% diclofenac formulation in a prospective, parallel, randomized, multicenter, double-blind study. Two groups of patients submitted to phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation were formed. Patients in one group were treated with meloxicam and those in the other group with diclofenac. Dosing was 1 drop t.i.d. for 30 days, beginning the first day after surgery, for both treatments. Inflammation was assessed by the presence of cells in the anterior chamber, anterior chamber flare, ciliary flush, photophobia and pain. Both treatments significantly reduced these indicators. Topical meloxicam and diclofenac produced a similar degree of burning sensation and conjunctival hyperemia. There was no significant difference between treatments in any of the measured parameters. It is concluded that the novel meloxicam solution is effective and safe. Meloxicam, however, did not offer any significant benefit over the diclofenac formulation in patients submitted to cataract surgery.

Purpose: There is evidence that the sulfonylurea antidiabetic agent glibenclamide reduces the analgesic action of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids and neuromodulators in animal models. Therefore, in view of the vast clinical uses and interactions of NSAIDs with commonly used therapeutic agents, the interaction of the NSAID diclofenac and glibenclamide was investigated about pharmacokinetic profile and antinociceptive effect in rats., Methods: Antinociception was assessed using the formalin test. Fifty microliters of diluted formalin was injected s.c. into the dorsal surface of the right hind paw. Nociceptive behavior was quantified as the number of flinches of the injected paw during 60 min after injection. Rats were treated with oral administration of vehicle or increasing doses of diclofenac (3-18 mg/kg) before formalin injection. To determine the pharmacodynamic interaction between diclofenac and glibenclamide, the effect of oral administration of glibenclamide (1-30 mg/kg) on the antinociceptive effect induced by diclofenac (18 mg/kg, p.o.) was assessed. To evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction between diclofenac and glibenclamide, the effect of glibenclamide (10 mg/kg, p.o.) on the pharmacokinetic of diclofenac (18 mg/kg, p.o.) was studied in the rat. Blood samples were taken over 8 h and analyzed using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method to generate the pharmacokinetic profile of diclofenac. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using noncompartmental analysis., Results: Systemic administration of diclofenac produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect in the formalin test. Systemic treatment with glibenclamide prevented diclofenac-induced antinociception. In pharmacokinetic interaction study, no significant (P>0.05) change in diclofenac concentration-time profiles in the presence of glibenclamide was detected., Conclusion: The experimental findings suggest that systemic glibenclamide is able to block the diclofenac-induced antinociception in the rat formalin test. Besides, this antagonism was not produced by diminution in the bioavailability of diclofenac. Likewise, the validated assay had sufficient accuracy and precision for pharmacokinetic determination of diclofenac in the rat.

It has been proposed that the antinociception of systemic diclofenac is the outcome of peripheral and central actions. Hence, our purpose was to examine if systemic diclofenac is able to achieve effective concentrations at local and spinal sites and to characterize the interaction between its local and spinal actions. Pain was produced in the rat using the formalin test. Oral diclofenac (1-10 mg/kg) reduced formalin-induced pain. The antinociceptive effect of oral diclofenac (10 mg/kg) was abolished by local or spinal administration of either L-NAME (1-100 microg and 1-50 microg) or glibenclamide (12.5-100 microg and 25-75 microg). These results suggest that oral diclofenac achieves effective concentrations producing an antinociceptive effect involving participation of the NO-potassium channel pathway at both, the local and spinal levels. In an additional experimental series, diclofenac was administered either locally (25-200 microg) or spinally (12.5-100 microg), yielding an antinociceptive effect by both routes. Then, diclofenac was given simultaneously by these two routes in a fixed-ratio, and antinociception was assayed. Isobolographic analysis revealed an additive interaction between the local and spinal effects of diclofenac. Hence, our results provide evidence that the overall antinociceptive effect induced by systemic diclofenac is the outcome of central and peripheral mechanisms.

It has been shown that the association of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with opioid analgesic agents can increase their antinociceptive activity, allowing the use of lower doses and thus limiting side effects. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine the possible pharmacological interaction between lumiracoxib and codeine or nalbuphine at the local peripheral level in the rat using the 1% formalin test and isobolographic analysis. Lumiracoxib, codeine, nalbuphine or fixed-dose ratios lumiracoxib-codeine or lumiracoxib-nalbuphine combinations were administrated locally in the formalin-injured paw and the antinociceptive effect was evaluated using the 1% formalin test. All treatments produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect. ED(40) values were estimated for the individual drugs and an isobologram was constructed. The derived theoretical ED(40)'s for the lumiracoxib-codeine and lumiracoxib-nalbuphine combinations were 423.4+/-31.3 microg/paw and 310.9+/-24.2 microg/paw, respectively, being significantly higher than the actually observed experimental ED(40) values, 233.2+/-30.9 microg/paw and 132.7+/-11.6 microg/paw, respectively. These results correspond to a synergistic interaction between lumiracoxib and opioids at the local peripheral level, potency being about two times higher with regard to that expected from the addition of the effects of the individual drugs. Data suggest that low doses of the lumiracoxib-opioids combination can interact synergistically at the peripheral level and therefore this drug association may represent a therapeutic advantage for the clinical treatment of inflammatory pain.

The aim of this pilot study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), diclofenac (2-(2,6-dichloranilino) phenylacetic acid), for treatment of acute pain originated by lower-limb fracture and surgery, with that of diclofenac plus B vitamins. This clinical trial was single-center, prospective randomized and double-blinded. After giving informed consent, patients with lower-limb closed fractures rated their pain on a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). Patients were then randomized to receive 75 mg diclofenac or 75 mg diclofenac plus B vitamins (thiamine, pyridoxine and cyanocobalamin) twice daily (all intramuscularly). Patient evaluations of pain intensity were recorded throughout two periods: twenty-four hours pre-surgically and twenty-four hours postsurgical. Twenty-four hours after the first drug administration, patients underwent elective lower-limb surgery. Standardized general anesthetic techniques were used for all patients. Fourteen patients completed the study. The subjects' assessments of limb pain on the visual analog scale showed a significant reduction from baseline values regardless of the treatment group when surveyed at 12, 24, 36 and 48 hr post operation. All treatments showed a similar profile in pain reduction. There were reports of pain in the administration site, but in general, all the regimens were well tolerated.

Purpose: There are evidences that glibenclamide, a sulfonylurea antidiabetic agent, reduces the analgesic action of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids and neuromodulators in animal models. The purpose of this work was to examine in the rat if such interaction involves pharmacokinetic mechanisms or is solely limited to the pharmacodynamic level., Methods: All studies were carried out in female Wistar rats. Analgesia was assessed using the formalin test. Fifty microliters of diluted formalin was injected subcutaneously into the dorsal surface of the right hind paw. Nociceptive behavior was quantified as the number of flinches of the injected paw during 60 min after injection and a reduction in formalin-induced flinching was interpreted as an analgesic response. Rats were treated with oral diclofenac (3-18 mg/kg) in presence and the absence of oral glibenclamide (1-30 mg/kg). To evaluate the possibility of a pharmacokinetic interaction, the oral bioavailability of diclofenac (18 mg/kg) was studied in presence and the absence of glibenclamide (10 mg/kg)., Results: Oral administration of diclofenac produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect in the formalin test. Coadministration of glibenclamide significantly reduced diclofenac-induced antinociception. Notwithstanding, the interaction does no appear to involve pharmacokinetic mechanisms, as oral glibenclamide failed to produce any significant alteration in oral diclofenac bioavailability., Conclusion: Concomitant systemic administration of glibenclamide and diclofenac results in a reduction of the analgesic effect of the NSAID in the formalin test in the rat. This interaction, however, appears due solely to a pharmacodynamic mechanisms as diclofenac pharmacokinetics are not altered.

It has been shown that the association of diclofenac with other analgesic agents can increase its antinociceptive activity, allowing the use of lower doses and thus limiting side effects. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine the possible pharmacological interaction between diclofenac and gabapentin at the peripheral level in the rat using the 5% formalin test and isobolographic analysis. Diclofenac, gabapentin or a fixed-dose ratio diclofenac-gabapentin combination were administrated locally in the formalin-injured paw and the antinociceptive effect was evaluated using the 5% formalin test. All treatments produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect. ED30 values were estimated for the individual drugs and an isobologram was constructed. The derived theoretical ED30 for the diclofenac-gabapentin combination was 597.5+/-87.5 microg/paw, being significantly higher than the actually observed experimental value, 170.9+/-26.07 microg/paw. These results correspond to a synergistic interaction between diclofenac and gabapentin at the peripheral level, potency being about three times higher with regard to that expected from the addition of the effects of the individual drugs. Data suggest that low doses of the diclofenac-gabapentin combination can interact synergistically at the peripheral level and therefore this drug association may represent a therapeutic advantage for the clinical treatment of inflammatory pain.

Evidence suggests that the ATP-sensitive K+ channels are important in the peripheral antinociceptive effect of diclofenac. Combinations of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with other different drugs are currently used in clinical practice to increase the analgesic efficacy and to reduce adverse events. We evaluated the effect of the combination of diclofenac and the activator of K+ channels pinacidil in the formalin test. Female Wistar rats (180-200 g) were injected in the dorsal surface of the right hind paw with 50 microl of formalin (1%). Nociception was quantified as the number of flinches of the injected paw during the next 60 mins, while reduction of flinches was considered antinociception. Ipsilateral, but not contralateral, pretreatment with diclofenac (25-200 microg/paw) or pinacidil (5-50 microg/paw) significantly reduced, in a dose-dependent manner the formalin-induced flinching behavior during the second phase of the test. To determine if pinacidil was able to increase the effect of diclofenac, noneffective increasing doses of pinacidil were coadministered with an ineffective dose of diclofenac (25 microg). The local co-administration of pinacidil and diclofenac produced a significant reduction in the number of flinches during phase 2, but not during phase 1 of the test compared to the effect of either drug alone. In conclusion, the combination of individually ineffective doses of diclofenac and pinacidil produce an antinociceptive effect in the formalin test. In addition, pinacidil increased the action of diclofenac, probably through the activation of K+ channels.

This study was designed to evaluate the extent of the antinociceptive interaction between codeine and diclofenac at the local, spinal and systemic level. The effects of individual and fixed-ratio combinations of locally, spinally or orally given codeine and diclofenac were assayed using the formalin test in rats. Isobolographic analysis was employed to characterize the synergism produced by the combinations. Codeine, diclofenac and fixed-ratio codeine-diclofenac combinations produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect when administered locally, spinally or systemically. ED(30) values were estimated for the individual drugs and isobolograms were constructed. Theoretical ED(30) values for the combination estimated from the isobolograms were 422.2+/-50.5 microg/paw, 138.5+/-9.2 microg/rat, and 9.3+/-1.1 mg/kg for the local, spinal and oral routes, respectively. These values were significantly higher than the actually observed ED(30) values which were 211.1+/-13.6 microg/paw, 45.9+/-3.9 microg/rat, and 2.5+/-0.2 mg/kg, indicating a synergistic interaction. Systemic administration resulted in the highest increase in potency, being about fourfold, while spinal and local administration increased potency in two- and threefold, respectively. The fact that the highest synergism was observed after systemic administration suggests that the interaction is occurring at several anatomical sites. The results support the clinical use of this combination in pain management.

The aim of this study was to examine if the peripheral antinociceptive effects of diclofenac and indomethacin involve the sequential participation of NO and cGMP synthesis followed by potassium channel opening. The peripheral antinociceptive effects of diclofenac, indomethacin, pinacidil (a potassium channel opener) and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP, which increases cGMP content in a NO-independent manner) were assayed using the formalin test in the rat. All compounds produced significant local antinociception. Diclofenac effect was reverted by N(G)-L-nitro-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, an inhibitor of NO synthesis), by 1 H-(1,2,4)-oxadiazolo (4,2-a) quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ, an inhibitor soluble guanylyl cyclase), and by the potassium channel blockers glibenclamide, tolbutamide, charybdotoxin and apamin. Pinacidil effect was blocked by glibenclamide, tolbutamide, charybdotoxin and apamin, strongly suggesting that potassium channel opening results in antinociception. ANP effect was inhibited by the potassium channel blockers, but not by L-NAME, suggesting that potassium channel opening is a consequence of an increased cGMP content. Indomethacin was effective, but at doses higher than those of diclofenac, and could not be blocked by L-NAME nor by potassium channel blockers. The present results suggest that the L-arginine-NO-cGMP-potassium channel pathway is involved in the peripheral antinociceptive effect of diclofenac, but not of indomethacin, and thus provide evidence for differences in mechanisms of action among nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

The involvement of K(+) channels in the antinociceptive action of diclofenac was assessed in the formalin test. Local administration of diclofenac produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect due to a local action because drug administration in the contralateral paw was ineffective. Pretreatment of the injured paw with glibenclamide and tolbutamide (ATP-sensitive K(+) channel inhibitors), charybdotoxin and apamin (large- and small-conductance Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channel blockers, respectively), 4-aminopyridine or tetraethylammonium (voltage-dependent K(+) channel inhibitors) prevented diclofenac-induced antinociception. Given alone, K(+) channel inhibitors did not modify formalin-induced nociceptive behavior. Pinacidil (an ATP-sensitive K(+) channel opener) also produced antinociception which was blocked by glibenclamide. The peripheral antinociceptive effect of morphine (positive control) was blocked by glibenclamide and 4-aminopyridine but not by charybdotoxin or apamin. The results suggest that the peripheral antinociceptive effect of diclofenac may result from the activation of several types of K(+) channels, which may cause hyperpolarization of peripheral terminals of primary afferents.

The peripheral antinociceptive effect of the selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib in the formalin-induced inflammatory pain was compared with that of resveratrol (COX-1 inhibitor) and diclofenac (non-selective COX inhibitor). Rats received local pretreatment with saline, celecoxib, diclofenac or resveratrol followed by 50 microl of either 1% or 5% formalin. Peripheral administration of celecoxib did not produce antinociception at either formalin concentration. In contrast, diclofenac and resveratrol produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect in the second phase of both 1% and 5% formalin test. The peripheral antinociception produced by diclofenac or resveratrol was due to a local action, as drug administration in the contralateral paw was ineffective. Results indicate that the selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib does not produce peripheral antinociception in formalin-induced inflammatory pain. In contrast, selective COX-1 and non-selective COX inhibitors (resveratrol and diclofenac, respectively) are effective drugs in this model of pain.