Search

The literature shows evidence of the mechanical investigation of numerous polymeric dental biomaterials using a static approach. A more representative mechanical analysis of such materials must take into account the dynamic masticatory load of the oral cavity. The aim of this work is to study the dynamic mechanical proprieties and provide an in vitro characterization of 11 3D-printed new dental biomaterials to understand their clinical applications under physiological conditions. The analysis included Dynamical Mechanical Analysis (DMA) and an MTT cytotoxicity assay. The mechanical results at low frequencies (1–11 Hz) show high uncertainty, less fragility, and less strength. The biological results show a significant reduction in cell viability (p < 0.01) at both the 3 and 24 h timepoints, with a degree of recovery observed at 24 h. To assess the clinical potential of dental biomaterials, it is necessary to determine whether there are good dynamic mechanical properties and reduced adverse biological effects on oral cells. This may allow for the facile fabrication via 3D printing of prosthetic devices that can support masticatory loads over long periods of time. Further investigations of the presented polymeric materials are needed, exploring biological assessments for longer than 24 h.

The literature shows evidence of the mechanical investigation of numerous polymeric dental biomaterials using a static approach. A more representative mechanical analysis of such materials must take into account the dynamic masticatory load of the oral cavity. The aim of this work is to study the dynamic mechanical proprieties and provide an in vitro characterization of 11 3D-printed new dental biomaterials to understand their clinical applications under physiological conditions. The analysis included Dynamical Mechanical Analysis (DMA) and an MTT cytotoxicity assay. The mechanical results at low frequencies (1–11 Hz) show high uncertainty, less fragility, and less strength. The biological results show a significant reduction in cell viability (p < 0.01) at both the 3 and 24 h timepoints, with a degree of recovery observed at 24 h. To assess the clinical potential of dental biomaterials, it is necessary to determine whether there are good dynamic mechanical properties and reduced adverse biological effects on oral cells. This may allow for the facile fabrication via 3D printing of prosthetic devices that can support masticatory loads over long periods of time. Further investigations of the presented polymeric materials are needed, exploring biological assessments for longer than 24 h. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]