Search

Background and Aims: Evidence on the link between sleep patterns and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in the community essentially relies on studies that investigated one single sleep pattern at one point in time. This study examined the joint effect of five sleep patterns at two time points with incident CVD events., Methods: By combining the data from two prospective studies, the Paris Prospective Study III (Paris, France) and the CoLaus|PsyCoLaus study (Lausanne, Switzerland), a healthy sleep score (HSS, range 0-5) combining five sleep patterns (early chronotype, sleep duration of 7-8 h/day, never/rarely insomnia, no sleep apnoea, and no excessive daytime sleepiness) was calculated at baseline and follow-up., Results: The study sample included 11 347 CVD-free participants aged 53-64 years (44.6% women). During a median follow-up of 8.9 years [interquartile range (IQR): 8.0-10.0], 499 first CVD events occurred (339 coronary heart disease (CHD) and 175 stroke). In multivariate Cox analysis, the risk of CVD decreased by 18% [hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.89] per one-point increment in the HSS. After a median follow-up of 6.0 years (IQR: 4.0-8.0) after the second follow-up, 262 first CVD events occurred including 194 CHD and 72 stroke. After adjusting for baseline HSS and covariates, the risk of CVD decreased by 16% (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.97) per unit higher in the follow-up HSS over 2-5 years., Conclusions: Higher HSS and HSS improvement over time are associated with a lower risk of CHD and stroke in the community., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Studies examining the role of factor V Leiden among patients at higher risk of atherothrombotic events, such as those with established coronary heart disease (CHD), are lacking. Given that coagulation is involved in the thrombus formation stage on atherosclerotic plaque rupture, we hypothesized that factor V Leiden may be a stronger risk factor for atherothrombotic events in patients with established CHD., Methods: We performed an individual-level meta-analysis including 25 prospective studies (18 cohorts, 3 case-cohorts, 4 randomized trials) from the GENIUS-CHD (Genetics of Subsequent Coronary Heart Disease) consortium involving patients with established CHD at baseline. Participating studies genotyped factor V Leiden status and shared risk estimates for the outcomes of interest using a centrally developed statistical code with harmonized definitions across studies. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to obtain age- and sex-adjusted estimates. The obtained estimates were pooled using fixed-effect meta-analysis. The primary outcome was composite of myocardial infarction and CHD death. Secondary outcomes included any stroke, ischemic stroke, coronary revascularization, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality., Results: The studies included 69 681 individuals of whom 3190 (4.6%) were either heterozygous or homozygous (n=47) carriers of factor V Leiden. Median follow-up per study ranged from 1.0 to 10.6 years. A total of 20 studies with 61 147 participants and 6849 events contributed to analyses of the primary outcome. Factor V Leiden was not associated with the combined outcome of myocardial infarction and CHD death (hazard ratio, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.92-1.16]; I 2 =28%; P -heterogeneity=0.12). Subgroup analysis according to baseline characteristics or strata of traditional cardiovascular risk factors did not show relevant differences. Similarly, risk estimates for the secondary outcomes including stroke, coronary revascularization, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality were also close to identity., Conclusions: Factor V Leiden was not associated with increased risk of subsequent atherothrombotic events and mortality in high-risk participants with established and treated CHD. Routine assessment of factor V Leiden status is unlikely to improve atherothrombotic events risk stratification in this population.

Background: The Genetics of Subsequent Coronary Heart Disease (GENIUS-CHD) consortium was established to facilitate discovery and validation of genetic variants and biomarkers for risk of subsequent CHD events, in individuals with established CHD., Methods: The consortium currently includes 57 studies from 18 countries, recruiting 185 614 participants with either acute coronary syndrome, stable CHD, or a mixture of both at baseline. All studies collected biological samples and followed-up study participants prospectively for subsequent events., Results: Enrollment into the individual studies took place between 1985 to present day with a duration of follow-up ranging from 9 months to 15 years. Within each study, participants with CHD are predominantly of self-reported European descent (38%-100%), mostly male (44%-91%) with mean ages at recruitment ranging from 40 to 75 years. Initial feasibility analyses, using a federated analysis approach, yielded expected associations between age (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.14-1.16) per 5-year increase, male sex (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.13-1.21) and smoking (hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.35-1.51) with risk of subsequent CHD death or myocardial infarction and differing associations with other individual and composite cardiovascular endpoints., Conclusions: GENIUS-CHD is a global collaboration seeking to elucidate genetic and nongenetic determinants of subsequent event risk in individuals with established CHD, to improve residual risk prediction and identify novel drug targets for secondary prevention. Initial analyses demonstrate the feasibility and reliability of a federated analysis approach. The consortium now plans to initiate and test novel hypotheses as well as supporting replication and validation analyses for other investigators.

Objectives: To determine whether dietary pattern assessed by a simple self-administered food frequency questionnaire is associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in high-risk patients with stable coronary artery disease., Background: A Mediterranean dietary pattern has been associated with lower cardiovascular (CV) mortality. It is less certain whether foods common in western diets are associated with CV risk., Methods: At baseline, 15 482 (97.8%) patients (mean age 67 ± 9 years) with stable coronary heart disease from 39 countries who participated in the Stabilisation of atherosclerotic plaque by initiation of darapladib therapy (STABILITY) trial completed a life style questionnaire which included questions on common foods. A Mediterranean diet score (MDS) was calculated for increasing consumption of whole grains, fruits, vegetables, legumes, fish, and alcohol, and for less meat, and a 'Western diet score' (WDS) for increasing consumption of refined grains, sweets and deserts, sugared drinks, and deep fried foods. A multi-variable Cox proportional hazards models assessed associations between MDS or WDS and MACE, defined as CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke., Results: After a median follow-up of 3.7 years MACE occurred in 7.3% of 2885 subjects with an MDS ≥15, 10.5% of 4018 subjects with an MDS of 13-14, and 10.8% of 8579 subjects with an MDS ≤12. A one unit increase in MDS >12 was associated with lower MACE after adjusting for all covariates (+1 category HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91, 0.98, P = 0.002). There was no association between WDS (adjusted model +1 category HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97, 1.01) and MACE., Conclusion: Greater consumption of healthy foods may be more important for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease than avoidance of less healthy foods typical of Western diets., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Elevated lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 activity promotes the development of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques, and elevated plasma levels of this enzyme are associated with an increased risk of coronary events. Darapladib is a selective oral inhibitor of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2., Methods: In a double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 15,828 patients with stable coronary heart disease to receive either once-daily darapladib (at a dose of 160 mg) or placebo. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Secondary end points included the components of the primary end point as well as major coronary events (death from coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, or urgent coronary revascularization for myocardial ischemia) and total coronary events (death from coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, or any coronary revascularization)., Results: During a median follow-up period of 3.7 years, the primary end point occurred in 769 of 7924 patients (9.7%) in the darapladib group and 819 of 7904 patients (10.4%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio in the darapladib group, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.03; P=0.20). There were also no significant between-group differences in the rates of the individual components of the primary end point or in all-cause mortality. Darapladib, as compared with placebo, reduced the rate of major coronary events (9.3% vs. 10.3%; hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.00; P=0.045) and total coronary events (14.6% vs. 16.1%; hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.98; P=0.02)., Conclusions: In patients with stable coronary heart disease, darapladib did not significantly reduce the risk of the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; STABILITY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00799903.).

The national observational study of diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization (ONACI) is a prospective multicenter registry of the French Society of Cardiology including all interventional cardiology procedures performed from 2004. We aimed to evaluate "real-world" management of patients with coronary artery disease in France from this registry. The present study was focused on data collected from 2004 to 2008. Patient demographics and co-morbidities, invasive parameters, treatment options, and procedural techniques were prospectively collected. Patients were recruited from 99 hospitals (55% of patients were hospitalized in private clinics and 45% in public institutions). During a 5-year period, a total of 298,105 patients underwent coronary angiography and 176,166 patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Diagnosis was acute coronary syndrome in 22%, stable angina or silent ischemia in 23%, and atypical chest pain in 9% of cases. Normal coronary arteries or nonsignificant coronary narrowing were found in 26% of patients. Radial access was increasingly used over the years regardless of the indication. The average number of percutaneous coronary interventions per procedure was 1.5 ± 0.7 (range, 1.3 ± 0.7 to 1.5 ± 0.7) and that of stents per procedure was 1.5 ± 0.8 (range, 1.5 ± 0.8 to 1.6 ± 0.8). Drug-eluting stents were used in 45% (range, 34% to 62%), increasing from 2004 to 2006, and then decreasing after the 2006 controversy. In conclusion, ONACI is one of the largest catheterization registries during this period, providing a detailed and comprehensive global description of the spectrum and management of patients with suspected coronary artery disease undergoing cardiac catheterization., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We assessed the independent effects of beta blockers, calcium antagonists, lipid-lowering drugs, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), anti-platelet drugs, vitamin K antagonists, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery by-pass grafting (CABG) on mortality and on the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, stroke or heart failure in patients with stable angina pectoris. We estimated the effects of the interventions used at baseline by multivariate Cox regression and during follow-up by G-estimation in 7,665 patients followed for a mean of 5 years in the ACTION trial. Adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) comparing all cause mortality among users during follow-up to non-users were 1.01 (0.91, 1.09) for beta blockade, 0.82 (0.75, 0.89) for ACEIs or ARBs, 0.93 (0.87, 0.98) for calcium antagonists, 0.54 (0.49, 0.62) for lipid-lowering drugs, 0.49 (0.42, 0.53) for anti-platelet drugs, 0.74 (0.69, 0.78) for PCI, and 0.91 (0.82, 0.98) for CABG. Effects on the composite endpoint were less marked. This observational study confirms that ACEIs or ARBs, lipid-lowering and anti-platelet drugs as used in the everyday management of stable angina have independent secondary preventive effects. Calcium antagonists, PCI and CABG also appear to improve outcome.

Our aim in this study was to examine the relationship between regular exercise and major cardiovascular events in hypertensive elderly with established coronary heart disease (CHD) in the primary care setting. The PREHACOR study recruited 3193 hypertensive patients, aged 74 +/- 6 years, 67% male, with CHD. Regular exercise assessed by questionnaire was defined as recreational activity >20 min/day, >3 times/week. Endpoints at 6 months were new cardiovascular events (NCEs: myocardial infarction and hospitalization for stroke, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, or coronary revascularization). New cardiovascular events occurred in 376 patients (11.8%), with 17 deaths (0.5%). New cardiovascular events patients were older, with higher body mass index, and were more likely to have diabetes, arrhythmia, history of congestive heart failure, and noncardiac organ damage than non-NCE patients. Blood pressure was significantly and similarly reduced in both groups. Multivariate logistic regression associated NCEs positively and independently with a history of congestive heart failure (odds ratio [OR] 2.50; confidence interval [CI] = 1.9-3.23), noncardiac target organ damage (OR 1.51; CI = 1.20-1.90), and beta-blocker use (OR 1.28; CI = 1.02-1.59), and inversely and independently with combination low-dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor + diuretic therapy (OR 0.66; CI = 0.45-0.95) and regular exercise (OR 0.70; CI = 0.54-0.90). Regular exercise is significantly associated with fewer major cardiovascular events in hypertensive elderly subjects with established CHD.

Objectives: We sought to assess the frequency and causes of stent thrombosis in diabetic and nondiabetic patients after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents., Background: Safety concerns about late stent thrombosis have been raised, particularly when drug-eluting stents are used in less highly selected patients than in randomized trials., Methods: The EVASTENT study is a matched multicenter cohort registry of 1,731 patients undergoing revascularization exclusively with sirolimus stents; for each diabetic patient included (stratified as single- or multiple-vessel disease), a nondiabetic patient was subsequently included. Patients were treated with aspirin + clopidogrel for at least 3 months and were followed for 465 (range 0 to 1,062) days (1-year follow-up in 98.5%). The primary end point was a composite of stent thrombosis (according to Academic Research Consortium definitions), cardiovascular death, and nonfatal myocardial infarction (major adverse cardiac events [MACE])., Results: During follow-up, MACE occurred in 78 patients (4.5%), cardiac death in 35 (2.1%), and stent thrombosis in 45 (2.6%): 30 definite, 23 subacute, and 22 late, including 9 at >6 months. In univariate analysis, the 1-year stent thrombosis rate was 1.8 times higher in diabetic than in nondiabetic patients (3.2% vs. 1.7%; log rank p = 0.03), with diabetic patients with multiple-vessel disease experiencing the highest rate and nondiabetic single-vessel disease patients the lowest (4.3% vs. 0.8%; p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, in addition to the interruption of antithrombotic treatment, independent stent thrombosis predictors were previous stroke, renal failure, lower ejection fraction, calcified lesion, length stented, and insulin-requiring diabetes., Conclusions: The risk of sirolimus stent thrombosis is higher for multiple-vessel disease diabetic patients.

The combination of a beta-blocker, a platelet inhibitor, a statin and an ACE inhibitor (B.A.S.I.C. regimen) provides major therapeutic benefits in the management of coronary patients. In patients receiving the quadruple combination, the overall mortality risk is 75% lower than for patients receiving none of these four therapies. According to the data from the PREVENIR III study, the combination of a statin and a platelet inhibitor reduces the risk of recurrent coronary events by 71%, the risk of recurrent vascular events by 65% and the risk of death from all causes taken together by 68%, when compared with the absence of these two medications. In the French USIC 2000 survey, prescription of the triple combination of platelet inhibitor, statin and beta-blocker is also associated with a 50% reduction in overall mortality. However, although the B.A.S.I.C. strategy is of major therapeutic value, it markedly increases the number of tablets to be taken every day. Treatment compliance, which is a predictive factor for overall mortality in diabetic coronary patients, diminishes markedly as the number of medications to be taken every day increases. The availability of fixed combinations, e.g. statin-acetylsalicylic acid, thus makes it possible to reduce the number of tablets to be taken at any one time, thus potentially increasing treatment compliance and the efficacy of the treatment administered.

Aims: Our study aimed to examine the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in Europe and the Mediterranean basin, and to compare adherence to guidelines with that reported in the first Euro Heart Survey on ACS (EHS-ACS-I), 4 years earlier., Methods and Results: In a prospective survey conducted in 2004 (EHS-ACS-II), data describing the characteristics, treatment, and outcome of 6385 patients diagnosed with ACS in 190 medical centres in 32 countries were collected. ACS with ST-elevation was the initial diagnosis in 47% of patients, no ST-elevation in 48%, and undetermined electrocardiographic pattern in 5% of patients. Comparison of data collected in 2000 and 2004 showed similar baseline characteristics, but greater use of recommended medications and coronary interventions in EHS-ACS-II. Among patients with ST-elevation, the use of primary reperfusion increased slightly (from 56 to 64%), with a significant shift from fibrinolytic therapy to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). The use of PPCI rose from 37 to 59% among those undergoing primary reperfusion therapy. Analysis of data in 34 centres that participated in both surveys showed even greater improvement with respect to the use of recommended medical therapy, interventions, and outcome., Conclusion: Data from EHS-ACS-II suggest an increase in adherence to guidelines for treatment of ACS in comparison with EHS-ACS-I.

Introduction: The reasons why statins are under-utilized in elderly patients remain poorly understood. The aim of this study was to identify the reasons given by cardiologist for the non-prescription of statins in elderly CHD patients., Methods: Two cross-sectional pharmaco-epidemiological surveys were carried out among French cardiologists. The sample consisted of 1148 coronary patients aged 35 to 69 years and 1489 patients aged > or =70 years. Patients' risk factors, medical history, treatments, lipid values and the physicians' various motives for the non-prescription of statins were recorded., Results: Patients not treated with statins reached 37% in the age-group > or =70 years and 14% in the age-group 35-69 years. The main reason given for statin non-prescription was the lack of a medical indication (2.5% of the age-group 35-69 years and 14% of the age-group > or =70 years). Among patients > or =70 years, the lack of indication was more often cited in the following conditions: 1) in very old patients (36% of lack of indication in the age-group >85 years vs. 10% in 70-75 years), 2) when lipid values were not available (20% when data were not available vs. 9%) and 3) when the patient had no prior history of myocardial infarction (MI) (20% when no history of MI vs. 7%). These factors were not associated with lack of indication among patients <70 years. History of intolerance or side effect was given for 1.3% and 14% of patients for each of the groups (35-69 and > or =70) and poor overall patient adherence was cited in 1% and 2%, respectively., Conclusion: The primary reason for the under-prescription of statins in elderly coronary patients is the perceived lack of indication, which stresses the need of extensive guidelines for prescription in elderly patients. Several factors associated with this perception seem to be specific to the elderly.

Aim: To describe the treatment of ambulatory patients with coronary artery disease, using information from the French farmers' insurance fund (Mutualité Sociale Agricole, MSA) database., Population and Methods: Analysis of cardiovascular medications bought and reimbursed during the second quarter of 2004 for 16,694 patients affiliated with the MSA who were first diagnosed with coronary artery disease in 1998, 2001 or 2003., Results: On average, 71% of patients received antiplatelet agents, 56% beta-blockers, 59% statins, and 36% ACE inhibitors. Only 32% received the combination of antiplatelet agents, statins, and beta-blockers, and only 14% all four classes. Practice guidelines were followed more closely in patients diagnosed most recently. Patients receiving all four classes of secondary prevention medication more often has a history of myocardial infarction or were younger. Average doses were consistent with recommendations for beta-blockers, but appeared too low for ACE inhibitors and statins (except for atorvastatin)., Perspectives: Medical management of patients with chronic coronary artery disease in France, while still suboptimal, is improving. Our findings, which are concordant with previous registry data, emphasize the underuse of recognized secondary prevention medications in very elderly patients and the importance of the initial prescription at diagnosis.

Background: Results of randomized trials of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and preserved left ventricular function are conflicting. We undertook this study to determine whether long-term prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors decreases major cardiovascular events and mortality in patients who have CAD and no evidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction., Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and IPA databases, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (1990-2004), and reports from scientific meetings (2003-2004), and we reviewed secondary sources. Search terms included angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, coronary artery disease, randomi(s)zed controlled trials, clinical trials, and myocardial infarction. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials in patients who had CAD and no heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction, with follow-up omicronf 2 years or longer. Of 1146 publications screened, 7 met our selection criteria and included a total of 33 960 patients followed up for a mean of 4.4 years., Results: Five trials included only patients with documented CAD. One trial included patients with documented CAD (80%) or patients who had diabetes mellitus and 1 or more additional risk factors, and another trial included patients who had CAD, a history of transient ischemic attack, or intermittent claudication. Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors decreased overall mortality (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.93), cardiovascular mortality (odds ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.90), myocardial infarction (odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.89), and stroke (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.88). Other end points, including resuscitation after cardiac arrest, myocardial revascularization, and hospitalization because of heart failure, were also reduced., Conclusion: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors reduce total mortality and major cardiovascular end points in patients who have CAD and no left ventricular systolic dysfunction or heart failure.

Introduction: Although platelet antiaggregants, beta-blockers and statins have proved their efficacy as secondary prevention in all types of patients with arterial and thrombotic disease, these therapeutic categories remain under-used in the elderly. The reasons for this under-prescription are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to determine the reasons for not prescribing the principal secondary prevention therapies in elderly coronary patients., Methods: Two transversal pharmaco-epidemiological surveys were carried out in a representative sample of French cardiologists. They included 1489 coronary patients aged 35 to 69 years and 1148 patients aged over 70 years, respectively. Risk factors, medical history, current treatments and reasons for non-prescription of the principal therapies were collected., Results: In subjects aged 70 years or over, antiaggregants were not prescribed in 24% of patients, versus 7.5% of younger patients. Statins were not prescribed in 37% of those over 70 years, versus 14% of younger patients. Beta-blockers were not prescribed in 42% of elderly patients versus 23% of younger patients. ACE inhibitors were not prescribed in 57.6% of elderly subjects and 48.2% of younger subjects. Combinations of three or four secondary prevention treatments were half as frequently prescribed in patients over the age of 70. According to the physicians, the main reason for non-prescription in elderly patients was a lack of indication, which concerned 8% of the entire sample with respect to antiaggregants, 9% for beta-blockers and 14% for statins. These very high percentages were not found in younger subjects (1%, 3% and 2.5%, respectively)., Conclusion: Our results confirm under-use of the principal secondary prevention therapies in elderly subjects, mainly because of a lack of indication, according to the physicians. In these patients, indications for secondary prevention appear to be tributary to numerous factors, such as age, the type of medical history, the availability of lipid parameters or compliance. In response to questions by practitioners, specific recommendations would be useful concerning secondary prevention in elderly coronary patients.

Background: Several classes of medications improve survival in patients with coronary artery disease. Whether these medications, as used in the real world, have additive efficacy remains speculative., Objectives: To assess whether patients discharged on combined secondary prevention medications after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have improved 1-year survival, compared with the action of any single class of medications., Design and Setting: Nationwide registry of consecutive patients admitted to intensive care units for AMI in November 2000 in France. Multivariate Cox regression analysis, including a propensity score for the prescription of combined therapy, was used., Results: Of the 2119 patients discharged alive, 1095 (52%) were prescribed a combination of antiplatelet agents, beta-blockers, and statins (triple therapy), of whom 567 (27%) also received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (quadruple therapy) and 528 (25%) did not. One-year survival was 97% in patients receiving triple combination therapy versus 88% in those who received either none, 1, or 2 of these medications (P < .0001). After multivariate adjustment including the propensity score, the hazard ratio for 1-year mortality in patients with triple combination therapy was 0.52 (95% CI 0.33-0.81). In patients with ejection fraction < or = 35%, beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were independent predictors of survival, and combination therapy had no additional prognostic value., Conclusions: Compared with the prescription of any single class of secondary prevention medications, combination therapy offers additional protection in patients with AMI.

There are two types of acute coronary syndromes : those with or without ST-segment elevation. The former require urgent therapeutic measures to reopen the culprit artery (intravenous thrombolysis or primary percutaneous coronary intervention). For the latter, risk stratification is essential and is based upon clinical and biochemical markers. Among them, recent and repeated anginal attacks, ST-segment modifications on admission electrocardiogram, and increased markers of myonecrosis (particularly increased troponin levels) are strong predictors of untoward outcome. According to the risk profile, the initial management is based upon an invasive strategy with powerful antithrombotic medications and urgent angiography, or upon a non-invasive strategy using stress testing, preferably coupled with myocardial imaging techniques. In all instances, secondary prevention measures are determinant to try and stop the progression of the atherosclerotic disease.

Background and Aim: The problem of a possible gender bias in coronary heart disease management is still controversial. We studied gender differences in secondary preventive drug prescriptions and in referral to cardiac rehabilitation after acute coronary events in France., Methods: An observational survey was carried out in 1998-1999 in 150 French intensive cardiac care units. A sample of 2626 consecutive patients admitted for myocardial infarction or unstable angina and alive at discharge was included. Data were retrospectively collected from medical records after discharge., Results: The sample was composed of 1921 men and 705 women. At discharge, antiplatelet agents were prescribed in 93.4% of men and 91.5% of women (p=0.09), beta-blockers in 73.4% and 63.7% (p<0.0001), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in 39.9% and 44.3% (p<0.05), and statins in 47.0% and 40.7% (p<0.01). The percentage of subjects referred to a cardiac rehabilitation program at discharge was 26.2% in men and 15.5% in women (p<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, taking into account confounding factors, gender did not appear as an independent determinant of drug prescriptions. Conversely, being a woman was independently associated with a lower probability to be referred to a cardiac rehabilitation program at discharge (adjusted female-to-male odds ratio: 0.44 (95% confidence interval: [0.31-0.64], p<0.0001)., Conclusions: In this study, gender was not an independent determinant of secondary preventive drug prescriptions after acute coronary events. Conversely, we found a gender bias in referral to cardiac rehabilitation programs at discharge.

Background: In the general population, pulse pressure (PP) is a correlate of cardiovascular outcomes. Few data are available regarding the links between PP and documented coronary artery disease (CAD)., Methods: From July 2000 to January 2002, a total of 1337 patients referred for a first diagnostic coronary angiogram at 75 participating centers were prospectively included. Of these individuals, 280 patients receiving no hypertensive therapy constituted the study population. Pulse pressure was recorded in the aortic root before angiography, and baseline characteristics, medical history, treatment used, and data from coronary angiography were recorded., Results: In the whole population, aortic PP strongly correlated with the presence and extent of CAD in univariate analyses. However, the correlation disappeared in multivariate analysis, and a strong interaction with gender was found. In women (n = 82), aortic PP was not an independent predictor of CAD. However, in men (n = 198) an independent correlation between aortic PP and CAD was found, together with age and hypercholesterolemia. In addition, PP was strongly correlated with the extent of CAD (no disease, 51 +/- 16 mm Hg; one or two stenoses, 54 +/- 18 mm Hg; and more than two stenoses: 64 +/- 20 mm Hg)., Conclusions: In this multicenter study, aortic PP was significantly correlated with the presence and extent of CAD in patients without antihypertensive therapy. This correlation, however, was independent of other risk factors for CAD in men but not in women.

Purpose: Cardiac rehabilitation after acute coronary syndrome is an important but underused therapeutic intervention. The aim of the French nationwide PREVENIR survey was to improve knowledge on the management of cardiovascular risk factors, especially during cardiac rehabilitation after acute coronary syndrome. The purpose of this study was to specify the characteristics of patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation., Methods: The survey was performed in 77 of 501 (15.4%) public or private French coronary care units. All French regions were involved. All the patients admitted to the hospital during January 1998 who survived an acute coronary syndrome were included in the survey. Data on rehabilitation practice were collected from patient medical records, either during an outpatient consultation or from the patient and the general practitioner during the 6-month follow-up period., Results: Of the 1394 patients included in the study (779 with myocardial infarction and 615 with unstable angina), only 310 (22%) underwent cardiac rehabilitation. Significant differences in patient characteristics were found between the cardiac rehabilitation and non-cardiac rehabilitation groups, respectively, in terms of gender (82% male vs 68%; P <.001), age younger than 65 years (56% vs 39%; P <.001), type of acute coronary syndrome (75% myocardial infarction vs 50%; P <.001), left ventricular ejection fraction less than 35% (6% vs 13%; P <.0004), and prevalence of percutaneous intervention (54% vs 46%; P <.02). Two risk factors were more common in the rehabilitated group: dyslipidemia (52% vs 44%; P <.02) and current smoking (51% vs 37%; P <.0001). In the multivariate analysis, female gender (odds ratio [OR], 0.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.87) and older age (>75 years vs. <65 years; OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.3-0.7) predicted decreased cardiac rehabilitation prescription. Conversely, previous history of dyslipidemia (OR,1.4; 95% CI, 1.04-1.8), post-myocardial infarction (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 2.13-3.89), and a percutaneous intervention (OR,1.9; 95% CI, 1.3-2.7) predicted increased cardiac rehabilitation prescription. Severe left ventricular impairment (< or =35% vs >50%) was not an independent factor for cardiac rehabilitation prescription. At 6-month follow-up assessment, rehabilitation patients had a lower rate of hypertension (18% vs 27%), elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (54% vs 62%), and continued smoking (34% vs 50%)., Conclusions: The results of the PREVENIR survey underscore the low level of cardiac rehabilitation prescription in France, and the relative exclusion of women and elderly people. Among the risk factors, dyslipidemia and current smoking are more frequent among rehabilitated patients. These findings may help to modify the strategy for using cardiac rehabilitation after acute coronary syndrome, although it is an effective intervention for secondary prevention.

Objective: To determine if the correlation between magnitude of creatine kinase-myocardial band release after coronary artery bypass surgery and 6-month mortality is comparable to that of patients admitted with an acute coronary syndrome., Methods: The GUARDIAN trial tested the efficacy of cariporide, an Na+/H+ exchange inhibitor, on reduction of myocardial ischemia or death in high-risk patients. We compared 6-month survival in a cohort of 2332 GUARDIAN patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass surgery at entry with 4233 acute coronary syndrome patients stratified by level of creatine kinase-myocardial band release. Cumulative 6-month survival by creatine kinase-myocardial band categories was performed using life table analysis, adjusting for variables known to impact prognosis using Cox regression., Results: The 6-month mortality rates for coronary artery bypass surgery patients with peak creatine kinase-myocardial band ratios of <1, > or =1 and <5, > or =5 and <10, and > or =10 upper limits of normal (ULN) were 5.8, 2.8, 5.9, and 12.0%, respectively (P <.0001). The 6-month mortality rates for acute coronary syndrome patients with peak creatine kinase-myocardial band ratios of <1, > or =1 and <5, > or =5 and <10, and > or =10 ULN were 6.3, 9.8, 10.0, and 12.3%, respectively (P <.0001). Patients with coronary artery bypass surgery or acute coronary syndrome had similar adjusted 6-month survival estimates at normal creatine kinase-myocardial band levels and when the creatine kinase-myocardial band level was > or =10 ULN. Patients with coronary artery bypass surgery had significantly better survival at intermediate enzyme levels (> or =1 and <10 ULN; P <.001)., Conclusions: Modest elevations of creatine kinase-myocardial band release (> or =1 and <10 ULN) after coronary artery bypass surgery are not associated with adverse 6-month survival, in contrast to that seen in acute coronary syndrome patients. Routine creatine kinase-myocardial band sampling should be considered in all higher-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery procedures to identify the sizable cohort of patients with creatine kinase-myocardial band release > or =10 ULN; these patients may benefit from postoperative angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and beta-blocker therapy. Newer cardioprotective agents that reduce the number of patients with marked creatine kinase-myocardial band release are currently being tested in large randomized controlled clinical trials.

The clinical classification of acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation has long been a topic of debate. Braunwald's classification, however, is now widely adopted and permits to recognize the most severe forms of acute coronary syndromes. Risk stratification is essential and is based upon clinical and biological markers. Among them, recent and repeated anginal attacks, ST-segment modifications on admission electrocardiogram, and increased markers of myonecrosis (particularly increased troponine levels) are strong predictors of untoward outcome. These variables can be used to construct risk scores, among which the Timi risk score is the most widely used.

Aims The present study aims to describe real-life outcomes in stable patients after-myocardial infarction (MI) similar to those in the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial (PEGASUS), which found long-term benefits of ticagrelor in patients with a history of MI. Methods One-year event-free post-MI patients were identified in the French claims database representative 1/97 sample (2005-2010) and followed for up to 3 years. A PEGASUS-like (PL) population included patients with age ≥ 65 years, or age ≥ 50 and diabetes, renal dysfunction or prior MI, without stroke, end-stage renal failure or oral anticoagulation. Outcomes were: a composite of all-cause death or hospital admission for MI or stroke; individual events; major bleeding. Results There were 1585 post-MI patients totalling 3926 person-years including 865 PL patients (2114 PY); 68% were male; mean age was 66 (standard deviation 15) in post-MI, 74 (10) in PL. Outcomes per 100 person-years [95% confidence interval] were, respectively, in post-MI and PL 6.3 [5.6-7.1] and 7.8 [6.7-8.9] for the composite outcome; 5.1 [4.4-5.8] and 6.5 [5.5-7.6] for death; 1.0 [0.7-1.3] and 1.0 [0.6-1.4] for MI; 0.6 [0.4-0.9] and 0.9 [0.5-1.2] for stroke; 1.3 [0.9-1.6] and 1.4 [0.9-1.9] for major bleeding. Event rates were stable over the 3 study years. Placebo patients in the PEGASUS-TIMI54 Study were younger, more often male and had lower event rates, especially for all-cause death and major bleeding. Conclusions Patients selected using the criteria described in PEGASUS were older with more comorbidities, resulting in higher all-cause death and bleeding rates, but similar MI recurrence rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background--Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is the preferred reperfusion method for ST-segment--elevation myocardial infarction, it remains difficult to implement in many areas, and fibrinolytic therapy is still widely used. Methods and Results--We assessed 5-year mortality in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction from the French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) 2005 according to use and type of reperfusion therapy. Of 1492 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction with a first call ≤12 hours from onset, 447 (30%) received fibrinolysis (66% prehospital; 97% with subsequent angiography, 84% with subsequent PCI), 583 (39%) had pPCI, and 462 (31%) received no reperfusion. Crude 5-year survival was 88% for the fibrinolytic-based strategy, 83% for pPCI, and 59% for no reperfusion. Adjusted hazard ratios for 5-year death were 0.73 (95% confidence interval, 0.50-1.06) for fibrinolysis versus pPCI, 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.88) for prehospital fibrinolysis versus pPCI, and 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.91) for fibrinolysis versus pPCI beyond 90 minutes of call in patients having called ≤180 minutes from onset. In propensity score-matched populations, however, survival rates were not significantly different for fibrinolysis and pPCI, both in the whole population (88% lysis, 85% pPCI) and in the population seen early (87% fibrinolysis, 85% pPCI beyond 90 minutes from call). Conclusions--In a real-world setting, on a nationwide scale, a pharmaco-invasive strategy constitutes a valid alternative to pPCI, with 5-year survival at least equivalent to that of the reference reperfusion method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We evaluated lipoprotein‐associated phospholipase A2 (Lp‐PLA 2) activity in patients with stable coronary heart disease before and during treatment with darapladib, a selective Lp‐PLA 2 inhibitor, in relation to outcomes and the effects of darapladib in the STABILITY trial. Methods and Results: Plasma Lp‐PLA 2 activity was determined at baseline (n=14 500); at 1 month (n=13 709); serially (n=100) at 3, 6, and 18 months; and at the end of treatment. Adjusted Cox regression models evaluated associations between Lp‐PLA 2 activity levels and outcomes. At baseline, the median Lp‐PLA 2 level was 172.4 μmol/min per liter (interquartile range 143.1–204.2 μmol/min per liter). Comparing the highest and lowest Lp‐PLA 2 quartile groups, the hazard ratios were 1.50 (95% CI 1.23–1.82) for the primary composite end point (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke), 1.95 (95% CI 1.29–2.93) for hospitalization for heart failure, 1.42 (1.07–1.89) for cardiovascular death, and 1.37 (1.03–1.81) for myocardial infarction after adjustment for baseline characteristics, standard laboratory variables, and other prognostic biomarkers. Treatment with darapladib led to a ≈65% persistent reduction in median Lp‐PLA 2 activity. There were no associations between on‐treatment Lp‐PLA 2 activity or changes of Lp‐PLA 2 activity and outcomes, and there were no significant interactions between baseline and on‐treatment Lp‐PLA 2 activity or changes in Lp‐PLA 2 activity levels and the effects of darapladib on outcomes. Conclusions: Although high Lp‐PLA 2 activity was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events, pharmacological lowering of Lp‐PLA 2 activity by ≈65% did not significantly reduce cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary heart disease, regardless of the baseline level or the magnitude of change of Lp‐PLA 2 activity. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00799903.

Copyright of Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Microalbuminuria (MAU) is a highly predictive, sensitive, inexpensive and easily repeatable marker of cardiovascular risk and all-cause mortality in hypertensive patients. The international, observational, practice-based study i-SEARCH (Survey for Evaluating Microalbuminuria Routinely by Cardiologists in patients with Hypertension) was designed to assess the frequency with which MAU occurred in a large outpatient population who were currently treated or newly diagnosed with hypertension and were under professional care. The primary aim of the study was to define the prevalence of MAU in hypertensive outpatients attending a cardiologist or internist (i-SEARCH A) and to compare hypertensive outpatients with or without coronary artery disease (i- SEARCH B). A secondary objective was to establish a correlation between MAU and known cardiovascular risk factors. A total of 21 050 patients from 26 countries were included in the primary analysis. Overall, this study demonstrated a very high worldwide prevalence (58.4%) of MAU in high-risk cardiovascular patients, but with a considerable variation across countries. MAU was more prevalent in patients with coronary artery disease than in those without. It was also significantly related to the presence of specific predictors, including male gender, abnormally high waist circumference, increased blood pressure levels (systolic =120 mmHg, diastolic =100 mmHg), creatinine clearance =50 mL/min, or clinical conditions such as diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, history of cerebral pathology, and peripheral arterial disease. Since the presence of MAU reflects longterm detrimental effects on the cardiovascular system, these results indicate the high, and in many cases hidden, burden of cardiovascular diseases among the hypertensive patients seen by cardiologists. This article discusses the main results of the study and the potential implications of ongoing analyses included in the core clinical study programme. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Because most of myocardial perfusion takes place during diastole, reducing the heart rate is likely to have anti-ischaemic effects. The present paper reviews the role of heart rate in relation to coronary artery disease outcome, as well as ways to reduce heart rate in the clinical setting. Nonpharmacological intervention, and particularly exercise training, has a definite effect on both heart rate reduction and the prevention of myocardial ischaemia. The protective role of β-blockers after acute myocardial infarction is amply documented; their anti-ischaemic efficacy appears to be attributable to their effect on heart rate, but also to their role in cardiac inotropism. Recently, the If (funny) current inhibitor ivabradine, which has a potent heart rate reduction effect without any haemodynamic effect has demonstrated anti-ischaemic efficacy in a randomised trial versus placebo, as well as in trials where it showed an effect similar to that of the conventional anti-ischaemic agents amlodipine and atenolol. In addition, such an agent, which does not influence myocardial contractility, might be particularly valuable in the setting of myocardial stunning or acute left ventricular failure at the acute stage of myocardial infarction. However, only future studies will determine whether isolated heart rate reduction will have the same protective efficacy as that of β-blocking agents in secondary prevention after myocardial infarction. Keywords: heart rate, myocardial ischaemia, β-blockers, If current, ivabradine Résumé La perfusion myocardique a lieu principalement pendant la période diastolique. Dans cette revue, les liens entre fréquence cardiaque et maladie coronaire sont rappelés et les traitements utilisables pour abaisser la fréquence cardiaque en clinique humaine sont passés en revue. Parmi ceux-ci, certains sont de nature non médicamenteuse, comme l’entraînement à l’effort, et ont démontré un effet à la fois sur le ralentissement de la fréquence cardiaque, tant au repos qu’à l’effort, et sur l’ischémie myocardique. Parmi les traitements médicamenteux anti-ischémiques, les β-bloquants représentent le chef de file incontesté. Outre leur impact sur la fréquence cardiaque, ils ont une action de prévention secondaire établie dans le post-infarctus. Leur action anti-ischémique est cependant vraisemblablement à la fois la résultante de la bradycardie qu’ils induisent, mais aussi de la baisse de contractilité. Les résultats récemment obtenus avec l’ivabradine, inhibiteur sélectif des canaux If (dits de pacemaker), sont à cet égard particulièrement intéressants car ils démontrent qu’un médicament agissant uniquement en réduisant la fréquence cardiaque et n’ayant aucun effet hémodynamique a une action anti-ischémique vérifiée contre placebo chez le coronarien stable, et comparable à l’effet anti-ischémique de l’amlodipine ou de l’aténolol. Par ailleurs, un tel médicament pourrait avoir un intérêt tout particulier dans les situations aiguës telles que la sidération myocardique ou les décompensations ventriculaires gauches aiguës au stade aigu de l’infarctus. Il faudra cependant attendre avant de savoir si la simple réduction de fréquence cardiaque permet d’obtenir la même efficacité de prévention secondaire que les β-bloquants. Mots clés : fréquence cardiaque, ischémie myocardique, β-bloquants, courant If, ivabradine [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract. In patients unable to perform a maximal exercise test, dipyridamole single-photon emission tomography (SPET) has a higher capacity than exercise SPET to detect coronary artery disease (CAD). However, in patients with myocardial ischaemia who are able to perform a maximal exercise test, it is not known whether these two tests may be equally used to assess the areas of myocardial ischaemia. This study was aimed at comparing the results provided by dipyridamole and exercise SPET in CAD patients with documented exercise myocardial ischaemia. Forty CAD patients who had undergone exercise thallium-201 SPET and who had myocardial ischaemia documented by an unequivocally positive exercise test underwent an additional [sup 20l]Tl SPET study after dipyridamole infusion and low-level (40 W) exercise. The extent of defects was compared between the two tests and predictors of discrepant results were sought among data from exercise testing and coronary angiography. The extent of SPET defects was equivalent between the two tests in only 11 patients (28%), larger defects being observed with exercise in 18 [average difference: 12% +/- 5% of left ventricle (LV)] and with dipyridamole in 11 (average difference: 15% +/- 11% of LV). The best independent predictors of discrepancies between the two tests were: (1) increase in heart rate at exercise SPET, with defects being smaller at exercise than after dipyridamole in none of the patients with an... [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract. beta-Methyl-substituted free fatty acids (FFAs) have been developed for myocardial single-photon emission tomography (SPET) imaging, but little is known about their kinetics in ischaemic conditions. The aim of this study was to determine the changes in the myocardial kinetics of a beta-methyl-branched FFA, [[sup 123]I] 16-iodo-3-methyl-hexadecanoic acid (MIHA), under ischaemic conditions. The kinetics of MIHA were analysed: (a) using a blood-perfused isolated heart model subjected to moderate ischaemia (50% flow reduction) and (b) in patients who had an exercise thallium-201 SPET defect corresponding to either necrotic (n = 13) or chronically ischaemic and viable (n = 15) myocardium, and who underwent two consecutive SPET studies after MIHA injection. In animals, the myocardial early retention fraction of MIHA, but not its clearance rate, was dependent on coronary flow, the early retention fraction being higher in ischaemic than in normoxic conditions (0.24 +/- 0.10 vs 0.14 +/- 0.04, P = 0.004). In the patient SPET studies, the uptake of MIHA calculated in ischaemic and viable areas (G1: 74% +/- 9% of maximal left ventricular value) was different from that calculated in necrotic (G2: 59% +/- 7%, P<0.001) or normal (G3:... [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This review was conducted to emphasize the complex interplay between atrial fibrillation (AF) and myocardial infraction (MI). In type 1 (T1) MI, AF is frequent and associated with excess mortality. Moreover, AF after hospital discharge for T1MI is not rare, suggesting the need to improve AF screening and to develop therapeutic strategies for AF recurrence. Additionally, AF is a common trigger for type 2 MI (T2MI), and recent data have shown that tachyarrhythmia or bradyarrhythmia could be a causal factor in, respectively, 13–47% or 2–7% of T2MI. In addition, AF is involved in T2MI pathogenesis as a result of severe anemia related to anticoagulants. AF is also an underestimated and frequent cause of coronary artery embolism (CE), as a situation at risk of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries. AF-causing CE is difficult to diagnose and requires specific management. Moreover, patients with both AF and chronic coronary syndromes represent a therapeutic challenge because the treatment of AF include anticoagulation, depending on the embolic risk, and ischemic heart disease management paradoxically includes antiplatelet therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An abstract of the article "C-reactive protein for risk assessment in coronary artery disease," by Nicolas Danchin is presented.

Assesses the evolution of the in-hospital results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in multivessel coronary artery disease in 1990-1991 versus 1994-1995. Occurrence of in-hospital cardiac complications and deaths; Baseline clinical and angiographic variables in the two cohorts of patients; Evidence of improvement from PTCA treatment.

Background and Aim: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) carries an increased risk of coronary artery disease. Little is known on its prevalence and long-term prognostic significance in patients having sustained an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The aim of this study was to assess 5-year outvcome of FH in patients with AMI included in the FAST-MI 2005 and 2010 registries. Methods: FAST-MI is a nationwide French registry programme including consecutive patients with AMI ≤ 48 hours of onset during a one-month period in most French institutions every 5 years since 2005; 5-year follow-up is available in >95% of patients for the 2005 and 2010 cohorts. An algorithm derived from the Dutch lipid clinic criteria was used to define probable or definite FH (FH+). Results: From 7839 patients included, 5415 had a lipid profile assessed at admission, among whom FH could be estimated from the algorithm in 5292, and 5147 survived the initial hospital phase. The prevalence of FH was 2.8% (n=146), 2.5% in 2005 and 3.0% in 2010. FH+ patients were younger (53 ± 12 vs 65 ± 14 years, P<0.001), with a lower GRACE score (119 vs 142, P<0.001), and more family history of premature coronary artery disease (68.5% vs 25%, P<0.001). LDL at admission was 220 ± 70 vs 116 ± 39 mg/dl, P<0.001). FH+ patients received more statins at discharge than FH- patients (99% vs 90%, P<0.001). Five-year survival in patients surviving the initial hospital phase, was 87% in FH+ and 82% in FH- patients (P=0.11), and MACE-free survival was 81.5% and 79% respectively (P=0.57). After adjustment using a Cox proportional hazard model, however, 5-year mortality was significantly higher in FH+ patients (fully adjusted model: HR 1.82; 95%CI: 1.15-2.89, P=0.01), MACE-free survival was lower (HR 1.97, 1.34-2.88, P=0.001). Propensity score-matched cohorts showed a lower survival and MACE-free survival in HCF patients (87% vs 94%, P=0.005, and 82% vs 90%, P=0.002) (Figure). Conclusion: FH was found in 2.8% of patients admitted for AMI; after adjustment on baseline parameters and discharge medications including statin dose at discharge, the risk of 5-year death and death or MACE was twice as high in FH compared with non-FH patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In a large, new, observational study, β-blocker treatment did not improve clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), including those with previous myocardial infarction, and was associated with more events in individuals with risk factors only. The role of β-blockers for secondary prevention in these patients should be reconsidered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abnormalities of myocardial energy metabolism appear as a common background of the two major cardiac disorders: ischemic heart disease (IHD) and heart failure (HF). Myocardial ischemia has been recently conceived as a multifaceted syndrome that can be precipitated by a number of mechanisms including metabolic abnormalities. HF is a progressive disorder characterised by a complex interaction of haemodynamic, neurohormonal and metabolic disturbances. HF may further promote metabolic changes, generating a vicious cycle. Thus, targeting cardiac metabolism in IHD patients may prevent the deterioration of left ventricular function, stopping the progression to HF. For these reasons, several studies have explored the potential benefits of trimetazidine (TMZ), an inhibitor of free fatty acids oxidation that shifts cardiac and muscle metabolism to glucose utilization. Because of its mechanism of action, TMZ has been found to provide a cardioprotective effect in patients with angina, diabetes mellitus, and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, and those undergoing revascularization procedures, without relevant side effects. In addition, the lack of interference with heart rate, arterial pressure, and most of frequent comorbidities, makes TMZ an attractive option for patients and clinicians as well. The impact of TMZ on long term mortality and morbidity in ischemic syndromes and in heart failure need to be conclusively confirmed in properly designed RCT. • Trimetazidine has a long-lasting record of efficacy and tolerability in angina pectoris. • Trimetazidine markedly reduces cardiac cell damage associated with PCI and CABG. • Trimetazidine has been shown to be effective in post-ischemic and idiopathic LV dysfunction. • Given its metabolic action, Trimetazidine, is uniquely effective in diabetic patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background There is a shortage of information on regional variations in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management and prognosis at a global level. We aimed to compare patient profiles, in-hospital management and post-discharge mortality across several world regions. Methods In total, 11,559 patients with STEMI were enrolled in two prospective studies of acute coronary syndrome survivors: EPICOR (4943 patients from 555 hospitals in 20 countries in Europe and Latin America recruited between September 2010 and March 2011) and EPICOR Asia (6616 patients from 218 hospitals in eight Asian countries recruited between June 2011 and May 2012). Comparisons were performed by eight pre-defined regions: Northern Europe (NE), Southern Europe (SE), Eastern Europe (EE), Latin America (LA), China (CN), India (IN), Southeast Asia (SA), and South Korea/Hong Kong/Singapore (KS). Results Reperfusion therapy rates ranged between 53.9% (IN) and 81.2% (SE), primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 24.8% (IN) and 65.6% (NE) and fibrinolysis between 8.1% (CN) and 34.2% (SA). Median time to primary PCI (h) ranged from 3.9 (NE) to 20.9 (IN) and to fibrinolysis from 2.4 (SE) to 6.3 (IN). Two-year mortality ranged between 2.5% in NE and 7.4% in LA. Regional variations in mortality persisted after adjustment for reperfusion therapy and known prognostic factors. Conclusions Among patients with STEMI, there is a wide regional variation in clinical profiles, hospital care and mortality. Substantial room for improvement remains at a global level for increasing reperfusion rates, reducing delays and post-discharge mortality in patients with STEMI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Anemia is a predictor of adverse outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. We studied the relationship of hemoglobin, or its change over time, and outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease.Methods: The ProspeCtive observational LongitudinAl RegIstry oF patients with stable coronary arterY disease is a prospective, cohort study of outpatients with stable coronary artery disease (32,901 in 45 countries 2009-2010): 21,829 with baseline hemoglobin levels. They were divided into hemoglobin quintiles and anemia status (anemic or normal at baseline/follow-up: normal/normal; anemic/normal; normal/anemic; anemic/anemic. All-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and major bleeding at 4-year follow-up were assessed.Results: Low baseline hemoglobin was an independent predictor of all-cause, cardiovascular, and noncardiovascular mortality, the composite of cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction or stroke and major bleeds (all P <.001; unadjusted models). Anemia at follow-up was independently associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55-2.33 for anemic/anemic; 1.87; 1.54-2.28 for normal/anemic; both P <.001), noncardiovascular mortality (P <.001), and cardiovascular mortality (P = .001). Patients whose baseline anemia normalized (anemic/normal) were not at increased risk of death (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.77-1.35), although the risk of major bleeding was greater (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.23-3.44; P = .013) than in those with normal hemoglobin throughout. Sensitivity analyses excluding patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease at baseline yielded qualitatively similar results.Conclusions: In this large population with stable coronary artery disease, low hemoglobin was an independent predictor of mortality, cardiovascular events, and major bleeds. Persisting or new-onset anemia is a powerful predictor of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Results from randomized trials evaluating thrombus aspiration (TA) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are conflicting. We assessed 1-year survival in STEMI patients participating in the French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation and non-STElevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) 2010 according to the use of TA during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). FAST-MI 2010 is a nationwide French registry that included 4,169 patients with acute myocardial infarction at the end of 2010 in 213 centers. Of those, 2,087 patients had STEMI, of whom 1,538 had primary PCI, with TA used in 671 (44%). Patients with TA were younger (61 ± 13.5 vs 63 ± 14 years), with a similar risk score of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (140 ± 31 vs 143 ± 34) and a shorter median time from symptom onset (245 vs 285 minutes); location of acute myocardial infarction, history of myocardial infarction, PCI, or coronary artery bypass surgery did not differ significantly. Thirty-day mortality was 2.1% versus 2.1% (adjusted p = 0.18), and the rate of 1-year survival was 95.5% versus 94.8%. Using fully adjusted Cox multivariate analysis, hazard ratio for 1-year death was 1.13 (95% confidence interval 0.66 to 1.94). After propensity score matching (480 patients per group), 1-year survival was also similar with both strategies. In a real-world setting of patients admitted with STEMI, the use of TA during primary PCI was not associated with improved 1-year survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: Early use of high-dose statins in acute coronary artery disease is controversial. Our aim was to use the French registry of Acute ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) to analyse patterns of statin prescription during the acute phase of myocardial infarction, and to identify factors associated with prescription strategies. Methods: We analysed statin prescription in 2509 patients with an acute myocardial infarction enrolled at 223 hospitals in France who were enrolled in the FAST-MI study and survived to hospital discharge. Patients were subdivided into four groups: never prescribed statins (n =304); only prescribed statins at hospital discharge (n =293); prescribed statins in the first 48h of hospitalization and at discharge (n =1318); prescribed statins before hospitalization, in the first 48h of hospitalization and at discharge (n =594). Results: Multivariable analysis showed that the presence of notable coronary lesions was significantly associated with all three statin prescription categories (P <0.001). History of hypercholesterolaemia (P <0.001) and prescription of evidence-based therapies for myocardial infarction in the first 48h of hospitalization (P ≤0.05) were significantly associated with statin prescription in the first 48h and at discharge, and with continuation of statin prescription if patients were receiving statins before hospitalization. High doses of statins were prescribed rarely; only 20.2% of patients prescribed statins in the first 48h of hospitalization and at discharge received atorvastatin 80mg/day. Conclusions: Use of statins by French cardiologists in the management of acute myocardial infarction is high, though still suboptimal. Outcomes may be improved by encouraging adherence to current guidelines, promoting the findings of clinical trials illustrating the benefits of intensive statin therapy, and reassessing professional practices in this setting. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

We evaluated the association of statin initiation within 48 hours of admission for an acute myocardial infarction with a 1-year prognosis on a nationwide scale. Patients who received a statin within 48 hours of admission but not before hospitalization had an improved prognosis (hazard ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 0.86, p &#60;0.007) after adjustment for covariates and propensity score. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]