Search

Background: The STICH trial showed superiority of coronary artery bypass plus medical treatment (CABG) over medical treatment alone (MED) in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%. In previous publications, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) prior to CABG was associated with worse prognosis., Objectives: The main purpose of this study was to analyse if prior PCI influenced outcomes in STICH., Methods and Results: Patients in the STICH trial (n = 1212), followed for a median time of 9.8 years, were included in the present analyses. In the total population, 156 had a prior PCI (74 and 82, respectively, in the MED and CABG groups). In those with vs. without prior PCI, the adjusted hazard-ratios (aHRs) were 0.92 (95% CI = 0.74-1.15) for all-cause mortality, 0.85 (95% CI = 0.64-1.11) for CV mortality, and 1.43 (95% CI = 1.15-1.77) for CV hospitalization. In the group randomized to CABG without prior PCI, the aHRs were 0.82 (95% CI = 0.70-0.95) for all-cause mortality, 0.75 (95% CI = 0.62-0.90) for CV mortality and 0.67 (95% CI = 0.56-0.80) for CV hospitalization. In the group randomized to CABG with prior PCI, the aHRs were 0.76 (95% CI = 0.50-1.15) for all-cause mortality, 0.81 (95% CI = 0.49-1.36) for CV mortality and 0.61 (95% CI = 0.41-0.90) for CV hospitalization. There was no evidence of interaction between randomized treatment and prior PCI for any endpoint (all adjusted p > 0.05)., Conclusion: In the STICH trial, prior PCI did not affect the outcomes of patients whether they were treated medically or surgically, and the superiority of CABG over MED remained unchanged regardless of prior PCI., Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov; Identifier: NCT00023595., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Prompt revascularization is often required in acute coronary syndromes (ACS), whereas stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) may allow for more measured procedural planning. Whether the acuity of presentation preferentially affects outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) is unknown. We investigated whether the acuity of presentation discriminated patients who derived a differential benefit from PCI versus CABG in the randomized Evaluation of XIENCE versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization (EXCEL) trial., Methods: We used multivariable Cox models to assess the interaction between the acuity of presentation, type of revascularization and outcomes in patients with low or intermediate SYNTAX scores enrolled in EXCEL., Results: At baseline, 1151 patients (60.7%) presented with SIHD and 746 patients (39.3%) presented with an ACS. The acuity of presentation was not associated with the primary endpoint of all-cause death, MI, or stroke at 3 years (multivariable adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.94; 95% CI 0.70-1.26, P = .64). The primary endpoint rate was similar in patients assigned to PCI versus CABG whether they presented with SIHD (adjusted HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.73-1.48]) or with ACS (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.54-1.26) (P interaction  = .34)., Conclusions: The acuity of presentation did not predict outcomes in patients with LMCAD undergoing revascularization, nor did it discriminate patients who derive greater event-free survival from PCI versus CABG., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Factors influencing the management of patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) are poorly described. We sought to analyze the clinical and angiographic variables influencing the decision-making process of patients with CTO. Consecutive patients with at least 1 coronary artery CTO were included and categorized as managed either by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), or medical therapy (MT). Patients with previous CABG were excluded. The CTO SYNTAX score (CTO-SS) was defined as the ratio between the score attributed to the CTO lesion in the SYNTAX score calculation and the total SYNTAX score. Independent predictors of management strategies were sought. A total of 510 patients were included (CTO incidence: 20%): 9% were treated with PCI, 34% with CABG, and 57% with MT. SYNTAX score was lowest in PCI (14.8 [11.0 to 18.5]) and highest in CABG (31.5 [25.0 to 38.8], p <0.0001). PCI was attempted more often in patients with higher CTO-SS (i.e., those with higher contribution to the overall SYNTAX score from the CTO lesion; 88% had a CTO-SS >0.5). Conversely, CABG was preferred in subjects with lower CTO-SS (61% had a CTO-SS ≤0.5, p <0.0001). Age, ejection fraction, SYNTAX score, and age of the CTO were independent predictors of revascularization. At mid-term follow-up, unsuccessful revascularization or MT was independently associated with death (hazard ratio 7.2, p = 0.0005). In conclusion, CTOs are frequently documented in clinical practice. However, less than a half is revascularized. Management strategies are influenced by angiographic variables such as the SYNTAX score and the newly proposed CTO-SS., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Short-term use of clopidogrel plus aspirin among patients with acute coronary syndrome reduces ischemic events, but concerns about coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery-related bleeding limit its early use., Methods: Using data from 4,794 consecutive CABG procedures in the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease (January 1999 to December 2003), we developed multivariable models for associations with CABG-related bleeding defined as reoperation for bleeding, red cell transfusion, and a composite of reoperation/transfusion/hematocrit drop>or=15%. We examined clopidogrel use

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the recommended mode of revascularization in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction (iLVSD) and multivessel disease. However, contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes have improved with the integration of novel technologies and refinement of revascularization strategies, and PCI is often used in clinical practice in this population. There is a lack of evidence from randomized trials comparing contemporary state-of-the-art PCI versus CABG for the treatment of iLVSD and multivessel disease. This was the impetus for the STICH3C trial (Canadian CABG or PCI in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy), described here. METHODS: The STICH3C trial is a prospective, unblinded, international, multicenter trial with an expected sample size of 754 participants from -45 centers. Patients with multivessel/left main coronary artery disease and iLVSD with left ventricular ejection fraction =40% considered by the local Heart Team appropriate for and amenable to revascularization by both modes of revascularization will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to state-of-the-art PCI or CABG. RESULTS: The primary end point is the composite of death from any cause, stroke, spontaneous myocardial infarction, urgent repeat revascularization, or heart failure readmission, summarized as a time-to-event outcome. The key hierarchical end point is time to death and frequency of hospitalizations for heart failure. The key safety outcome is a composite of major adverse events. Disease-specific quality-of-life and health economics measures will be compared between groups. Participants will be followed for a median of 5 years, with a minimum follow-up of 4 years. CONCLUSIONS: STICH3C will directly inform patients, clinicians, and international practice guidelines about the efficacy and safety of CABG versus PCI in patients with iLVSD. The results will provide novel and broad evidence, including clinical events, health status, and economic assessments, to guide care for patients with iLVSD and severe coronary artery disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Open in new tab Download slide Open in new tab Download slide OBJECTIVES The optimal revascularization strategy for patients with ischaemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (iLVSD) remains controversial. We aimed to compare percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and medical therapy (MT) in a network meta-analysis. METHODS All randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing any combination of PCI, CABG and MT in patients with iLVSD were analysed in a frequentist network meta-analysis (generic inverse variance method). Primary outcome was mortality at longest available follow-up. Secondary outcomes were cardiac death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) and repeat revascularization (RR). RESULTS Twenty-three studies were included (n  = 23 633; 4 randomized controlled trials). Compared to CABG, PCI was associated with higher mortality [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13–1.53], cardiac death (IRR 1.65, 95% CI 1.18–2.33), MI (IRR 2.18, 95% CI 1.70–2.80) and RR (IRR 3.75, 95% CI 2.89–4.85). Compared to CABG, MT was associated with higher mortality (IRR 1.52, 95% CI 1.26–1.84), cardiac death (IRR 3.83, 95% CI 2.12–6.91), MI (IRR 3.22, 95% CI 1.52–6.79) and RR (IRR 3.37, 95% CI 1.67–6.79). Compared to MT, PCI was associated with lower cardiac death (IRR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24–0.78). CABG ranked as the best revascularization strategy for mortality, cardiac death, MI and RR; MT ranked as the strategy associated with the lowest incidence of stroke. Left ventricular ejection fraction, year of study, use of drug-eluting stents did not affect relative treatment effects. CONCLUSIONS CABG appears to be the best therapy for iLVSD, although mainly based on observational data. Definitive randomized controlled trials comparing CABG and PCI in iLVSD are required. PROSPERO registration ID 132414. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]