Back to Search
Start Over
STICH3C: Rationale and Study Protocol.
- Source :
- Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions; Aug2023, Vol. 16 Issue 8, p487-497, 11p
- Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the recommended mode of revascularization in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction (iLVSD) and multivessel disease. However, contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes have improved with the integration of novel technologies and refinement of revascularization strategies, and PCI is often used in clinical practice in this population. There is a lack of evidence from randomized trials comparing contemporary state-of-the-art PCI versus CABG for the treatment of iLVSD and multivessel disease. This was the impetus for the STICH3C trial (Canadian CABG or PCI in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy), described here. METHODS: The STICH3C trial is a prospective, unblinded, international, multicenter trial with an expected sample size of 754 participants from -45 centers. Patients with multivessel/left main coronary artery disease and iLVSD with left ventricular ejection fraction =40% considered by the local Heart Team appropriate for and amenable to revascularization by both modes of revascularization will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to state-of-the-art PCI or CABG. RESULTS: The primary end point is the composite of death from any cause, stroke, spontaneous myocardial infarction, urgent repeat revascularization, or heart failure readmission, summarized as a time-to-event outcome. The key hierarchical end point is time to death and frequency of hospitalizations for heart failure. The key safety outcome is a composite of major adverse events. Disease-specific quality-of-life and health economics measures will be compared between groups. Participants will be followed for a median of 5 years, with a minimum follow-up of 4 years. CONCLUSIONS: STICH3C will directly inform patients, clinicians, and international practice guidelines about the efficacy and safety of CABG versus PCI in patients with iLVSD. The results will provide novel and broad evidence, including clinical events, health status, and economic assessments, to guide care for patients with iLVSD and severe coronary artery disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 19417640
- Volume :
- 16
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- Supplemental Index
- Journal :
- Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 171302432
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012527