Search

Background: In adults with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), higher stool concentrations of toxins A and B are associated with severe baseline disease, CDI-attributable severe outcomes, and recurrence. We evaluated whether toxin concentration predicts these presentations in children with CDI., Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of inpatients aged 2-17 years with CDI who received treatment. Patients were followed for 40 days after diagnosis for severe outcomes (intensive care unit admission, colectomy, or death, categorized as CDI primarily attributable, CDI contributed, or CDI not contributing) and recurrence. Baseline stool toxin A and B concentrations were measured using ultrasensitive single-molecule array assay, and 12 plasma cytokines were measured when blood was available., Results: We enrolled 187 pediatric patients (median age, 9.6 years). Patients with severe baseline disease by IDSA-SHEA criteria (n = 34) had nonsignificantly higher median stool toxin A+B concentration than those without severe disease (n = 122; 3,217.2 vs 473.3 pg/mL; P = .08). Median toxin A+B concentration was nonsignificantly higher in children with a primarily attributed severe outcome (n = 4) versus no severe outcome (n = 148; 19,472.6 vs 429.1 pg/mL; P = .301). Recurrence occurred in 17 (9.4%) of 180 patients. Baseline toxin A+B concentration was significantly higher in patients with versus without recurrence: 4,398.8 versus 280.8 pg/mL ( P = .024). Plasma granulocyte colony-stimulating factor concentration was significantly higher in CDI patients versus non-CDI diarrhea controls: 165.5 versus 28.5 pg/mL ( P < .001)., Conclusions: Higher baseline stool toxin concentrations are present in children with CDI recurrence. Toxin quantification should be included in CDI treatment trials to evaluate its use in severity assessment and outcome prediction.

With the approval and development of narrow-spectrum antibiotics for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), the primary endpoint for treatment success of CDI antibiotic treatment trials has shifted from treatment response at end of therapy to sustained response 30 days after completed therapy. The current definition of a successful response to treatment (three or fewer unformed bowel movements [UBMs] per day for 1-2 days) has not been validated, does not reflect CDI management, and could impair assessments for successful treatment at 30 days. We propose new definitions to optimise trial design to assess sustained response. Primarily, we suggest that the initial response at the end of treatment be defined as (1) three or fewer UBMs per day, (2) a reduction in UBMs of more than 50% per day, (3) a decrease in stool volume of more than 75% for those with ostomy, or (4) attainment of bowel movements of Bristol Stool Form Scale types 1-4, on average, by day 2 after completion of primary CDI therapy (ie, assessed on day 11 and day 12 of a 10-day treatment course) and following an investigator determination that CDI treatment can be ceased., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AMS is supported by career development awards from the US Veteran Affairs and Institute for Translational Medicine, serves on an advisory board for Recursion Pharmaceuticals, and has accepted honoraria from the American Society of Healthcare Pharmacists and the Academy for Continued Healthcare Learning. CDA has been supported by an investigator-initiated grant from Merck; serves on advisory boards for Cidara Therapeutics, Merck, and AiCuris; and has accepted honoraria from the American Society of Healthcare Pharmacists and the Academy for Continued Healthcare Learning. OAC has grants from Amplyx, Basilea, German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Cidara, German Center for Infection Research, Commission's Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (101037867), F2G, Gilead, Matinas, MedPace, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Octapharma, Pfizer, and Scynexis, has accepted consulting fees from AbbVie, Amplyx, Biocon, Biosys, Cidara, Da Volterra, Gilead, IQVIA, Janssen, Matinas, MedPace, Menarini, Molecular Partners, Mycoses Study Group Education & Research Consortium, Noxxon, Octapharma, Pardes, Pfizer, Pharmaceutical Security Institute, Scynexis, and Seres Therapeutics; has accepted speakernhonoraria from Abbot, AbbVie, Al-Jazeera Pharmaceuticals, Astellas, Gilead, Grupo Biotoscana/United Medical/Knight, Hikma, MedScape, MedUpdate, Merck/MSD, Mylan, Noscendo, Pfizer, and Shionogi; has served as an expert witness for Cidara; has participated on advisory boards for Actelion, Allecra, Cidara, Entasis, IQVIA, Janssen, MedPace, Paratek, PSI, Pulmocide, Shionogi, and the Prime Meridian Group; has filed for a patent with the German Patent and Trade Mark Office (Geschlossene Inkubationssysteme mit verbessertem Atemwegszugang für Untersuchungsvorrichtungen, DE 10 2021 113 007.7); has stock in CoRe Consulting; and has non-financial interests in the European Confederation of Medical Mycology, International Society for Human and Animal Mycology, Mycoses Study Group Education & Research Consortium, and Wiley Publishing. KWG is funded by investigator-initiated awards from Summit Therapeutics, Acurx, Paratek, and Seres Therapeutics. DNG has grants from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and US Veteran Affairs, a licensing agreement with Destiny Pharma, and has accepted consulting fees from Destiny Pharma. SJ is funded by grants from Paratek and Destiny Pharma, has accepted consulting fees from Bio-K+, Acurx, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, and Summit Therapeutics, and serves on the data safety monitoring board for Pfizer. SAK is funded by the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation, the Mooney Family Initiative for Translational and Clinical Studies in Rare Diseases Translational Research Program, Cures Within Reach, and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; has accepted consulting fees from Guidepoint; has accepted honoraria from the Louisiana Academy of Nutrition & Diabetics and Boston IBD; has accepted travel support from the Crohn's and Colitis and Helmsley Foundations; serves on the Peggy Lillis Foundation advisory board; and holds Eli Lilly stock. CPK has grant funding from Milky Way Life Sciences, Pfizer, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Merck, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals; has accepted consulting fees from Artugen, Facile Therapeutics, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Finch Therapeutics, Pfizer, Milky Way Life Sciences, RVAC Medicines, Seres Therapeutics, and Summit Therapeutics; has a patent with Quanterix; serves on the advisory board for Finch Therapeutics; is secretary for the Foundation for Celiac Disease Outcome Measures; and has stock in First Light and Cour Pharmaceuticals. CRK has grant funding from the NIH; has accepted consulting fees from Sebela Pharmaceuticals; and has accepted speakers honoraria from the American College of Gastroenterology. LKK has research funding from Merck. TL has accepted funding from Summit, Crestone, MGB Biopharma, Actelion, Cubist/Merck, Seres Therapeutics, and Vedanta Biosciences; and has accepted consulting fees from MGB Biopharma and Seres Therapeutics. MJGTV has received grants from MSD, Heel, Biontech, and Roche; has accepted consulting fees from MaaT, Tillots, MSD/Merck, FAV00B, Dr Regenold, Roche, and EUMEDICA; and has accepted honoraria from Merck/MSD, 3M, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Astellas, Uniklinik Karlsruhe, Uniklinik Köln, Akademia für Infektionsmedizin, Klinikum Essen, Pfizer, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Uniklinik Frankfurt, Landesärztekammer Hessen, Janssen, Institut Merieux, Forum für medizinische Fortildung, Universitätsklinikum Freburg, Berliner Dialy Seminar, Zertifikatskurs PTA im Krankenhaus, Falk Foundation, St Johannes Hospital, DiaLog Service, CED Service, Ärtzekammer Niedersachsen, St Josef Hospital, Limbach Grupe SE, SUMIT OZFORD, EUMDEICA Kit Kongress, Tillots Pharma, Helios Lkiniken, Lahn-Dill-Kliniken, and Gilead. MHW has research support from Almirall, Da Volterra, EnteroBiotix, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Merck, MicroPharm, Nabriva, Paratek, Pfizer, Seres Therapeutics, Summit Therapeutics, The European Tissue Symposium, Tillotts, IMI2 (EU Horizon 2020), and EFPIA partners; has accepted consulting fees from AiCuris, Bayer, Crestone, Da Volterra, Deinove, Destiny Pharma, EnteroBiotix, The European Tissue Symposium, Ferring, GSK, Menarini, Merck, Nestlé, Paion, Paratek, Pfizer, Phico Therapeutics, Qpex Biopharma, Seres, Surface Skins, Summit, Tillotts, and Vaxxilon/Idorsia; and has accepted speakers honoraria from Merck, Pfizer, Seres, and Tillotts. ERD is funded by grants from Synthetic Biologics and Ferring Pharmaceuticals and has accepted consulting fees from Pfizer, Merck, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Abbott, GSK, Seres Therapeutics, and Summit Therapeutics. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Intestinal bile acids play an essential role in the Clostridioides difficile lifecycle having been shown in vitro to modulate various aspects of pathogenesis, including spore germination, vegetative growth, and more recently the action of the primary virulence determinant, TcdB. Here, we investigated whether physiological levels of the total pool of intestinal bile acids in mice and humans protect against TcdB action. Small molecules extracted from the lumenal contents of the small intestine, cecum, colon, and feces were found to inhibit TcdB in accordance with the differential amounts of total bile acids in each compartment. Extracts from antibiotic-treated and germ-free mice, despite harboring dramatically altered bile acid profiles, unexpectedly also prevented TcdB-induced cell rounding to similar extents. We show that protection, however, is surmountable and can be overcome at higher doses of TcdB-typical to those seen during severe C. difficile infection-suggesting that the protective properties of intestinal bile acids are operant primarily under low to moderate toxin levels. Taken together, these findings demonstrate a role for intestinal bile acids in attenuating virulence, provide insights into asymptomatic carriage of toxigenic C. difficile , and inform strategies to manipulate bile acid levels for therapeutic benefit.

Objectives: We sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in pediatric immunocompromised (IC) patients., Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study of pediatric participants who underwent FMT between March 2013 and April 2020 with 12-week follow-up. Pediatric patients were included if they met the definition of IC and were treated with FMT for an indication of recurrent CDI. We excluded patients over 18 years of age, those with incomplete records, insufficient follow-up, or not meeting study definition of IC. We also excluded those treated for Clostridioides difficile recurrence without meeting the study definition and those with inflammatory bowel disease without another immunocompromising condition., Results: Of 59 pediatric patients identified at 9 centers, there were 42 who met inclusion and no exclusion criteria. Included patients had a median age of 6.7 years. Etiology of IC included: solid organ transplantation (18, 43%), malignancy (12, 28%), primary immunodeficiency (10, 24%), or other chronic conditions (2, 5%). Success rate was 79% after first FMT and 86% after 1 or more FMT. There were no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics or procedural components when patients with a failed FMT were compared to those with a successful FMT. There were 15 total serious adverse events (SAEs) in 13 out of 42 (31%) patients that occurred during the follow-up period; 4 (9.5%) of which were likely treatment-related. There were no deaths or infections with multidrug resistant organisms during follow-up and all patients with a SAE fully recovered., Conclusions: The success rate of FMT for recurrent CDI in this pediatric IC cohort is high and mirrors data for IC adults and immunocompetent children. FMT-related SAEs do occur (9.5%) and highlight the need for careful consideration of risk and benefit., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 by European Society for European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.)

Background: A recent study from Taiwan suggested that Clostridium innocuum may be an unrecognized cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) and clinically indistinguishable from Clostridioides difficile infection. Our objective was to compare C. innocuum prevalence and strain between those with AAD and asymptomatic controls., Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we collected stool from 200 individuals with AAD and 100 asymptomatic controls. We evaluated the association between AAD and C. innocuum in stool using anaerobic culture and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). To identify strain-specific associations with AAD, we performed whole-genome sequencing of C. innocuum isolates using Illumina MiSeq and constructed comparative genomics analyses., Results: C. innocuum was isolated from stool of 126/300 (42%) subjects and more frequently from asymptomatic controls than AAD subjects (50/100 [50%] vs 76/200 [38%], respectively; P = .047). C. innocuum isolation frequency was not associated with AAD in either the adult or pediatric subgroups. C. innocuum and C. difficile were frequently co-prevalent in individuals with and without diarrhea. There were no phylogenetic differences or accessory genome associations between C. innocuum isolates from AAD subjects and asymptomatic controls., Conclusions: C. innocuum was frequently isolated and at a greater frequency in asymptomatic controls than those with AAD. We did not identify strain lineages or accessory genomic elements associated with AAD. These data highlight that differentiating C. innocuum-associated diarrhea from asymptomatic colonization, and differentiating diarrhea caused by C. difficile from C. innocuum, are clinical microbiology challenges that require additional investigation to identify host-specific factors and/or biomarkers that distinguish these conditions., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. L. K. K. has received research grants from Merck, unrelated to this study. M. P. A. reports lecture honoraria and development of educational content with DKBMed and participation on a Data Safety and Monitoring Board for AbbVie Pharmaceuticals. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: To compare the incidence, epidemiology, testing patterns, treatment, and outcomes of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) among hospitalized pediatric patients from 2013 to 2019., Study Design: The Pediatric Health Information System database was queried for patient admissions (age 0-17 years) with International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th edition, codes for diagnoses of CDI with a billing code for a CDI-related antibiotic treatment., Results: We identified 17 142 pediatric patients, representing 23 052 admissions, with CDI. The adjusted annual CDI incidence decreased over the study period from 7.09 cases per 10 000 patient-days (95% CI, 6.15-8.18) in 2013 to 4.89 cases per 10 000 patient-days (95% CI, 4.03-5.93) in 2019 (P < .001). C difficile-specific testing also decreased during the study period (P < .001). Chronic gastrointestinal conditions (36%) and malignancy (32%) were the most common comorbidities in CDI encounters. Oral metronidazole use decreased during the study period (P < .01) and oral vancomycin use increased (P < .001)., Conclusions: Our study demonstrates a decrease in CDI incidence in hospitalized pediatric patients, a notable change from prior studies, although this may have been influenced by altered testing patterns. We found a high incidence of CDI in patients with cancer and gastrointestinal conditions: groups that warrant targeted evaluation of CDI prevention and treatment., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In a prospective cohort study, stools from children <3 years with and without diarrhea who were Clostridioides difficile nucleic acid amplification test-positive underwent ultrasensitive and quantitative toxin measurement. Among 37 cases and 46 controls, toxin concentration distributions overlapped substantially. Toxin concentration alone does not distinguish C. difficile infection from colonization in young children., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: Previously considered solely an opportunistic pathogen, Clostridium innocuum (CI) was recently reported in Taiwan to be an emerging cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and clinically indistinguishable from Clostridioides difficile (CD) infection. We previously identified CI culture supernatant being cross-reactive with commercial CD toxin enzyme immunoassays. We aimed to identify and characterize the cross-reacting protein and determine whether it functioned as a human toxin., Methods: We performed western blots using CI culture supernatants and CD anti-toxin antibodies and identified interacting bands. We identified protein(s) using tandem mass spectrometry and evaluated them by cytotoxicity assays., Results: CI, but not CD, was isolated from stool of 12 children and adults with diarrhea. Culture supernatant from 6/12 CI isolates, and an ATCC reference strain, tested positive for CD toxins (total 7/13 isolates) by commercial EIA. Using two of these isolates, we identified two ∼40 kDa hypothetical proteins, CI&#95;01447 and CI&#95;01448, and confirmed cross-reactivity with CD anti-toxin antibodies by enzyme immunoassay and Western blot. Whole-genome sequencing confirmed all 13 isolates contained both genes, which were highly conserved. We observed no cytopathic or cytotoxic effects to HeLa cells when treated with these proteins. We identified amino acid sequence similarity to the NlpC/P60 family of proteins., Conclusions: Our findings do not suggest CI proteins CI&#95;01448 and CI&#95;01447, which cross-react with antibodies against CD toxins A and B, are toxic to HeLa cells. Further studies are needed to determine the function of these cross-reacting proteins and the potential virulence factors that could be responsible for CI diarrheal disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Clostridioides difficile has become the most common healthcare-associated pathogen in the United States, leading the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to classify C. difficile as an "urgent" public health threat that requires "urgent and aggressive action." This call to action has led to new discoveries that have advanced our understanding of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) immunology and clinical development of immunologic-based therapies for CDI prevention. However, CDI immunology research has been limited in pediatric populations, and several unanswered questions remain regarding the function of host immune response in pediatric CDI pathogenesis and the potential role of immunologic-based therapies in children. This review summarizes the innate and adaptive immune responses previously characterized in animals and humans and provides a current update on clinical development of immunologic-based therapies for CDI prevention in adults and children. These data inform the future research needs for children., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose of Review: The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classified Clostridioides difficile as an 'urgent' public health threat that requires 'urgent and aggressive action'. This call to action has led to new discoveries that have advanced C. difficile infection (CDI) epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment, albeit predominantly in adults. In 2017, the Infectious Diseases Society of America and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America published clinical practice guidelines for both adults and children. At that time, recommendations in children were generally limited to relatively low-quality evidence., Recent Findings: Since publication of this guidance, there have been many advancements in the understanding of CDI in children. These include better understanding of healthcare settings as uncommon sources of C. difficile acquisition in children; risk factors for recurrent and community-associated CDI; performance of diagnostic tests in children and strategies for optimizing their use; and a more rigorous evidence base for CDI treatment in children, including the first-ever randomized controlled trial of CDI treatment in children and the largest study of fecal microbiota transplantation in children., Summary: This review highlights the most recent salient advancements in paediatric CDI knowledge and practice that supplement published clinical guidance provided prior to these advancements., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

A quasi-experimental study performed in a pediatric hematology-oncology unit demonstrated that whole-room ultraviolet-C disinfection was associated with a significant reduction in hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile infection (P< .01, trend and level), but not healthcare-associated viral respiratory infections (P= .06 for trend, P= .36 for level) or central line-associated bloodstream infections (P> 0.75, trend and level)., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile colonization is common among infants. Serological sequelae of infant C. difficile colonization are poorly understood., Methods: In this prospective cohort study of healthy infants, stools serially collected between ages 1-2 and 9-12 months were tested for non-toxigenic and toxigenic C. difficile (TCD). Cultured isolates underwent whole-genome sequencing. Serum collected at 9-12 months underwent measurement of IgA, IgG, and IgM against TCD toxins A and B and neutralizing antibody (NAb) titers against toxin B. For comparison, antitoxin IgG and NAb were measured in cord blood from 50 mothers unrelated to study infants., Results: Among 32 infants, 16 (50%) were colonized with TCD; 12 were first colonized >1 month before serology measurements. A variety of sequence types were identified, and there was evidence of putative in-home (enrolled siblings) and outpatient clinic transmission. Infants first colonized with TCD >1 month prior had significantly greater serum antitoxin IgA and IgG against toxins A (P = .02 for both) and B (P = .009 and .008, respectively) compared with non-TCD-colonized infants, and greater IgG compared with unrelated cord blood (P = .005). Five of 12 (42%) colonized infants had detectable NAb titers compared with zero non-TCD-colonized infants (P = .02). Breastfeeding was not associated with differences in serological measurements., Conclusions: TCD colonization is associated with a humoral immune response against toxins A and B, with evidence of toxin B neutralization in vitro. The extent and duration of protection against CDI later in life afforded by natural C. difficile immunization events require further investigation., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is a highly sensitive method for identifying genetic relatedness and transmission of Clostridioides difficile strains. Previous studies suggest that as few as 3 core genome single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) discriminate between genetically distinct isolates. Because a single C. difficile colony is selected from culture for WGS, significant within-host genetic diversity could preclude identification of transmission events. To evaluate the likelihood of missed transmission events using WGS of single colonies from culture, we examined within-host genetic diversity among C. difficile isolates collected from children. We performed WGS using an Illumina MiSeq instrument on 8  C. difficile colonies randomly selected from each culture performed on stool collected from 10 children (8 children diagnosed with C. difficile infection and 2 children with asymptomatic carriage); 77/80 (96%) isolate sequences were successfully assembled. Among 8/10 (80%) children, all isolates were the same sequence type (ST). The other 2 children each had mixed infection with two STs, although one ST predominated. Among 9/10 (90%) children, isotypic isolates differed by ≤2 SNVs; an isotypic isolate in the remaining child differed by 3 to SNVs relative to the other isolates from that child. Overall, among the 77 isolates collected from 10 stool cultures, 74/77 (96%) were clonal (i.e., same ST and ≤2 core genome SNVs) to other isolates in stool culture. In summary, we identified rare C. difficile within-host genetic diversity in children, suggesting that WGS of a single colony from stool is likely to appropriately characterize isolate clonality and putative transmission events in the majority of cases., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.)

Restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) and PCR ribotyping are two typing systems that have been frequently utilized for molecular epidemiologic characterization of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile. To correlate typing data obtained from each method, we performed both REA and PCR ribotyping on a large and diverse set of historical and contemporary C. difficile infection clinical isolates. Eighty isolates were selected from each reference laboratory in the United States (Microbiology Reference Laboratory, Hines VA Medical Center) and United Kingdom (Clostridium difficile Network for England and Northern Ireland laboratory, University of Leeds). The 160 isolates were assigned to 82 unique ribotypes and 51 unique REA groups (116 unique REA types). In general, concordance between typing methods was good. Dendrogram analysis of PCR ribotype band patterns demonstrated close genetic relationships among strain types with discordant REA and ribotype assignments. While REA typing was more discriminatory, several REA types in this study were further discriminated by PCR ribotyping, indicating that discriminatory value of these typing methods may be strain dependent. These data will assist with molecular epidemiologic surveillance of strains identified by these two commonly used C. difficile typing systems., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Fidaxomicin is an approved therapy for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) in adults. The safety of fidaxomicin in children has not been reported., Methods: In this study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01591863), pediatric patients with CDAD received twice-daily oral fidaxomicin at a dose of 16 mg/kg per day (up to 200 mg) for 10 days in an open-label study. Plasma and fecal samples were collected for pharmacokinetic assessments. The primary outcome measure was safety, which was assessed by adverse-event (AE), laboratory, and physical examination/vital-sign monitoring. Efficacy was determined through early and sustained clinical response rates (clinical response without recurrence of CDAD)., Results: The study enrolled 40 patients (11 months to 17 years of age), many with underlying comorbidity, including neoplasm (23.7%), gastrointestinal disorder (78.9%), and history of CDAD (60.5%). Plasma fidaxomicin and OP-1118 (the major fidaxomicin metabolite) 3- to 5-hour postdose concentrations were 0.6 to 87.4 and 2.4 to 882.0 ng/mL, respectively, and no age-related trends were seen. Fecal fidaxomicin concentrations within 24 hours of the last dose averaged 3228 µg/g, and higher concentrations and greater variability in the youngest age group were found. AEs were reported in 73.7% of the patients; most of them were mild (44.7%) to moderate (21.1%) and were considered treatment-related in 15.8% of the patients. Overall, the early clinical response rate was 92.1%. The rate of sustained clinical response (clinical response without recurrence through 28 days after treatment) was 65.8% overall., Conclusions: Fidaxomicin was well tolerated in children with CDAD and has a pharmacokinetic profile in children similar to that in adults. The clinical response rate was high.

Background: Although pediatric Clostridium difficile infections (CDIs) are increasing, C. difficile transmission patterns among children are poorly understood., Methods: We performed whole genome sequencing (WGS) on C. difficile isolates collected from children diagnosed with CDI between December 2012 and December 2013 at a single academic medical center. Genome sequences of isolates from CDIs diagnosed ≥8 weeks after study initiation were compared to all study isolate genome sequences. Among patients with isogenic isolates (≤2-3 core genome single nucleotide variants [SNVs] identified by pairwise SNV analyses), common inpatient and/or outpatient healthcare exposures were investigated., Results: Among 131 CDIs in 107 children, WGS identified 104 genetically distinct isolates. Of 84 incident CDIs occurring ≥8 weeks after study initiation, only 10 (11.9%) were caused by a strain isogenic to another cohort CDI isolate (putative transmission events). Proportions of each CDI class putatively associated with transmission were hospital-onset healthcare facility-associated (HCFA), 2/16 (12.5%); community-onset HCFA, 1/17 (5.9%); indeterminate, 1/11 (9.1%); community-associated (CA), 5/40 (12.5%); and recurrent, 1/21 (4.8%). Transmission events among CA and HCFA CDIs were similarly infrequent (5/40 [12.5%] vs 3/33 [9.1%]; P = .64). Shared healthcare facility exposures were only identified among 7/10 putative transmission events. Potential community transmission (same postal code) was not identified., Conclusions: WGS identified a highly diverse group of C. difficile isolates among children with CDI, including those with HCFA CDI. Clostridium difficile transmission among symptomatic children was very uncommon. Among putatively transmitted cases, investigation of shared healthcare exposures often did not identify a potential transmission source.

Background: Clostridium difficile strain DH/NAP11/106, a relatively antibiotic-susceptible strain, is now the most common cause of C. difficile infection (CDI) among adults in the USA., Objectives: To identify mechanisms underlying the evolution and transmission of an MDR DH/NAP11/106 clone., Methods: WGS (Illumina MiSeq), restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) and antibiotic susceptibility testing were performed on 134 C. difficile isolates collected from paediatric patients with CDI over a 2 year period., Results: Thirty-one of 134 (23%) isolates were REA group DH. Pairwise single-nucleotide variant (SNV) analyses identified a DH clone causing seven instances of CDI in two patients. During the 337 days between the first and second CDI, Patient 1 (P1) received 313 days of antibiotic therapy. Clindamycin and rifaximin resistance, and reduced vancomycin susceptibility (MIC 0.5-2 mg/L), were newly identified in the relapsed isolate. This MDR clone was transmitted to Patient 2 (P2) while P1 and P2 received care in adjacent private rooms. P1 and P2 each developed two additional CDI relapses. Comparative genomics analyses demonstrated SNVs in multiple antibiotic resistance genes, including rpoB (rifaximin resistance), gyrB and a gene encoding PBP; gyrB and PBP mutations did not consistently confer a resistance phenotype. The clone also acquired a 46 000 bp genomic element, likely a conjugative plasmid, which contained ermB (clindamycin resistance). The element shared 99% identity with the genomic sequence of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, an enteric commensal., Conclusions: These data highlight the emergence of MDR in C. difficile strain DH/NAP11/106 through multiple independent mechanisms probably as a consequence of profound antibiotic pressure.

Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 106 (also identified as restriction endonuclease analysis [REA] group DH) recently emerged as the most common strain causing C. difficile infection (CDI) among US adults. We previously identified this strain predominating our pediatric cohort. Pediatric clinical CDI isolates previously characterized by REA underwent antibiotic resistance testing and whole genome sequencing. Of 134 isolates collected from children, 31 (23%) were REA group DH. We performed a comparative genomics analysis to identify DH-associated accessory genes. We identified five DH-associated genes that are associated with virulence in other bacterial species but not previously known to contribute to CDI. These genes are associated with intestinal mucosal adhesion (collagen-binding surface protein), sporulation (sporulation integral membrane protein YtvI), and protection from oxidative stress and foreign DNA (DNA phosphorothioation-dependent restriction proteins, sulfurtransferase, and DNA sulfur modification proteins). The association of these genes was validated in a cohort of 623 publicly available C. difficile sequences, 10 (1.6%) of which were monophyletic to REA group DH through in silico multilocus sequence typing and core genome phylogenetic analysis. Further investigation is required to determine the contribution of these genes to the emergence and virulence of this epidemic strain., (Copyright © 2018 Institut Pasteur. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background.: Although Clostridium difficile infections (CDIs) are increasingly diagnosed in children, many children diagnosed with CDI lack classic risk factors. Frequent use of highly sensitive tcdB polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in low-risk patients leads to CDI misdiagnosis and unnecessary CDI antibiotic use in children with C difficile carriage., Methods.: For this quasi-experimental study, we developed and implemented an educational intervention (EI) to inform healthcare providers (HCPs) about tcdB PCR test limitations. We provided HCP didactic education and built an electronic notification into the tcdB PCR test order that describes scenarios in which carriage is more likely than CDI. Segmented regression analysis assessed changes in level (ie, overall rates) and trend of C difficile testing rate ([TR] number of tests performed per 1000 patient encounters) and test positivity rate ([PR] number of positive tests per 1000 patient encounters) between the pre- (August 2009-August 2013) and postintervention (February 2014-July 2015) periods., Results.: Hospital-wide, absolute TR reduction was 0.71 (P[level] = .0067; P[trend] = .0042) and absolute PR reduction was 0.14 (P[level] = .22; P[trend] = .018). In the outpatient setting, absolute TR reduction was 0.30 (P[level] = .0015; P[trend] < .001) and absolute PR reduction was 0.09 (P[level] = .0069; P[trend] = .046). The incidence density of healthcare facility-associated CDI did not significantly change after the EI. The EI was associated with avoidance of 574 tests and 113 positive tests (and subsequent antibiotic courses) during the postintervention period, which saved approximately $250 000 in patient charges related to CDI testing and treatment., Conclusions.: Healthcare provider education can cost-effectively reduce the frequency of C difficile testing and CDI misdiagnosis by improving test utilization among low-risk children., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The rising incidence of Clostridium difficile infections (CDIs) in adults is partly related to the global spread of fluoroquinolone-resistant strains, namely, BI/NAP1/027. Although CDIs are also increasingly diagnosed in children, BI/NAP1/027 is relatively uncommon in children. Little is known about the antibiotic susceptibility of pediatric CDI isolates. C. difficile was cultured from tcdB-positive stools collected from children diagnosed with CDI between December 2012 and December 2013 at an academic children's hospital. CDI isolates were grouped by restriction endonuclease analysis (REA). MICs were measured by agar dilution method for 7 antibiotics. Susceptibility breakpoints were based on guidelines from CLSI and/or the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). MICs and REA groupings of C. difficile isolates from 74 adult patients (29 isolates underwent REA) from a temporally and geographically similar adult cohort were compared to those of pediatric isolates. Among 122 pediatric and 74 adult isolates, respectively, the rates of resistance were as follows: metronidazole, 0% and 0%; vancomycin, 0% and 8% (P = 0.003); rifaximin, 1.6% and 6.7% (P = 0.11); clindamycin, 18.9% and 25.3% (P = 0.29); and moxifloxacin, 2.5% and 36% (P = <0.0001). Only 1 of 122 (0.8%) BI/NAP1/027 isolates was identified among the children, compared to 9 of 29 (31%) isolates identified among the adults (P = <0.0001). The 3 moxifloxacin-resistant pediatric isolates were of REA groups BI and CF and a nonspecific group. The 2 rifaximin-resistant pediatric isolates were of REA groups DH and Y. The 21 clindamycin-resistant pediatric isolates were distributed among 9 REA groups (groups A, CF, DH, G, L, M, and Y and 2 unique nonspecific REA groups). These data suggest that a diverse array of relatively antibiotic-susceptible C. difficile strains predominate in a cohort of children with CDI compared to adults., (Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.)

This Review summarizes the latest advances in the treatment and prevention of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), which is now the most common health-care-associated infection in the USA. As traditional, standard CDI antibiotic therapies (metronidazole and vancomycin) are limited by their broad spectrum and further perturbation of the intestinal microbiota, which result in unacceptably high recurrence rates, novel therapeutic strategies for CDI are needed. Emerging CDI therapies are focused on limiting further perturbation of the intestinal microbiota and/or restoring the microbiota to its pre-morbid state, reducing colonization of the intestinal tract by toxigenic strains of C. difficile and bolstering the host immune response against C. difficile toxins. Fidaxomicin is associated with reduced CDI recurrences, and other emerging narrow-spectrum CDI antibiotic therapies might eventually demonstrate a similar benefit. Prevention of intestinal colonization of toxigenic strains of C. difficile can be achieved through restoration of the intestinal microbiota with faecal microbiota transplantation, as well as by colonizing the gut with nontoxigenic C. difficile strains. Finally, emerging immunological therapies, including monoclonal antibodies and vaccines against C. difficile toxins, might protect against CDI and subsequent CDI recurrences. The available clinical data for these emerging therapies, and their relative advantages and disadvantages, are described.

Background: Most children with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) experience community onset of CDI symptoms., Methods: We retrospectively compared hospital-onset healthcare facility-associated CDI cases to community-associated (CA) CDI cases diagnosed by Cepheid Xpert tcdB polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at an academic children's hospital over a 1-year period. Saved stools from CDI cases additionally underwent anaerobic stool culture and multiplex gastrointestinal pathogen PCR testing., Results: Compared with 25 hospital-onset healthcare facility-associated CDI cases, the 74 CA-CDI cases were more frequently <2 years old (18% vs. 0%, P = 0.034) and less frequently had antibiotic exposure in the past 30 days (26% vs. 88%, P < 0.0001), proton pump inhibitor exposure (16% vs. 36%, P = 0.036) or a gastrostomy tube (11% vs. 32%, P = 0.013). Among children diagnosed with CA-CDI, 19 (26%) had no identified CDI risk factors (immunocompromised; gastrostomy tube; recent antibiotic, proton pump inhibitor or inpatient/outpatient healthcare exposures). Clinical testing for viral pathogens was uncommon among children thought to have CA-CDI. Multiplex PCR testing of saved stool samples failed to identify C. difficile among 23% of cases diagnosed with CA-CDI by the Cepheid Xpert tcdB PCR assay. CDI antibiotic therapy was provided to nearly all patients testing positive by tcdB PCR irrespective of CDI risk factors., Conclusions: Many children diagnosed with CA-CDI by PCR lack CDI risk factors and have discordant results when additional CDI testing methods are performed, suggesting overdiagnosis of CDI in children with community-onset diarrhea. More selective CDI testing of low-risk pediatric patients is needed to more accurately diagnose CDI and limit unnecessary CDI antibiotic treatment in children.

Clostridium difficile strain BI/NAP1/027 is associated with increased C. difficile infection (CDI) rates and severity, and the efficacy of some CDI therapies may be strain dependent. Although cultured C. difficile isolates can be reliably subtyped by various methods, the long turnaround times, high cost, and limited availability of strain typing preclude their routine use. Nucleic acid amplification tests identify BI/NAP1/027 rapidly from stool, but the emergence of closely related strains compromises test specificity. Although detection of epidemiologically significant pathogens is generally useful for infection control programs, specific data supporting use of rapid detection of BI/NAP1/027 as an infection control tool are still awaited., (Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.)

Objective: To identify risk factors for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (RCDI) in children., Study Design: A nested case-control study was performed to identify RCDI risk factors using a pediatric cohort of inpatients and outpatients diagnosed with Clostridium difficile infection by tcdB polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at an academic children's hospital between December 9, 2012, and June 30, 2014. Strict inclusion criteria were adopted to limit selection bias related to inappropriate inclusion of patients with probable C difficile colonization., Results: Thirty children with RCDI were compared with 94 children with non-RCDI. Statistically significant associations were identified between RCDI and malignancy (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.0-7.4, P = .044), tracheostomy tube dependence (OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.1-24.7, P = .037), and tcdB PCR cycle threshold (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.97, P = .01) using multivariable logistic regression modeling. The receiver operator characteristic curve for PCR cycle threshold as a predictor of RCDI demonstrated area under the curve = 0.67. The highest predictive rate (75%) for RCDI was demonstrated at cycle threshold cutpoint ≤ 20. The difference between sensitivity (64%) and specificity (68%) was minimized at cycle threshold cutpoint ≤ 23. Compared with controls with non-RCDI, children excluded because of probable C difficile colonization had a similar cycle threshold value (27.5 vs 27.2, P = .77)., Conclusions: Malignancy and tracheostomy tube dependence were identified as RCDI risk factors. Although RCDI was associated with positivity at a lower tcdB PCR cycle threshold, the clinical utility of cycle threshold as a tool to predict recurrence was limited. Better methods to predict RCDI are needed to prioritize pediatric populations to target for RCDI prevention efforts., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The molecular epidemiology of pediatric Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is poorly understood. We aimed to identify the restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) groups causing CDI and to determine risk factors and outcomes associated with CDI caused by epidemic strains in children., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Patients: Inpatients and outpatients >1 year old receiving care between December 2012 and December 2013., Setting: An academic children's hospital in Chicago, Illinois., Methods: C. difficile PCR-positive stools were cultured, and C. difficile isolates were typed by REA. REA of isolates from patients with multiple CDIs was performed to differentiate relapse (infection with same strain) from reinfection (different strains) irrespective of time between CDIs., Results: A total of 189 CDIs occurred among 145 patients. REA groups were widely distributed. The BI/NAP1/027 strain caused CDI in only 1 patient. DH/NAP11/106, the predominant epidemic strain identified, was associated with the use of third- or fourth-generation cephalosporins (risk ratio [RR], 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-9.9; P=.04). CDI relapse commonly occurred up to 20 weeks later. Compared with CDI caused by non-DH/NAP11/106 strains, CDI caused by DH/NAP11/106 was more likely to result in multiple CDI relapses (40% vs 8%; P=.05) among children with multiple CDIs., Conclusions: REA identified the exceedingly low prevalence of BI/NAP1/027 and the high prevalence of DH/NAP11/106, a common epidemic strain in the United Kingdom that is less often reported in the United States. CDI relapse commonly occurred up to 20 weeks from the previous CDI. Defining recurrent CDI as that occurring only within 8 weeks of the original infection may lead to misclassification of some recurrent CDIs as new CDIs in children.

To assess national variability in methods of identifying and preventing Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in pediatric populations, an anonymous survey was sent to hospital epidemiologists at US children's hospitals. Data from 30 hospitals indicate substantial variability in surveillance, testing, and infection control strategies, which may limit reliable interfacility comparison of CDI rates. In addition, only 60% of respondents perform surveillance for community-associated CDI., (Copyright © 2013 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)