Search

Background: Standard portal vein resection (PVR) has been proposed to improve oncological outcomes in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC), however it potentially introduces an increased risk of morbidity. The policy in Amsterdam UMC(AMC) is to resect the portal vein bifurcation selectively when involved, while in Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, standard PVR is performed with right trisectionectomy. The objective of this study was to analyze postoperative outcomes and survival after standard or selective PVR for PHC., Methods: A retrospective study was performed including PHC-patients undergoing right-sided resection in Amsterdam (2000-2018) and Berlin (2005-2015). Primary outcomes were 90-day mortality, severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo≥3), and overall survival (OS). A propensity score comparison (1:1 ratio) was performed corrected for age/sex/ASA/jaundice/tumor diameter/N-stage/Bismuth-Corlette type-IV., Results: A total of 251 patients who underwent right-sided resection for PHC were evaluated: 87 in the selective (Amsterdam) and 164 in the standard PVR-group (Berlin). Major differences in baseline characteristics were observed, with higher ASA and AJCC-stage in the standard PVR-group (Berlin). Severe morbidity and 90-day mortality were comparable before matching (selective/Amsterdam:68% and 19%, standard/Berlin:61% and 17%,p = 0.284 and p = 0.746, respectively). After propensity score matching, both short term outcomes and OS were comparable (selective/Amsterdam (n = 45) 33 months (95%CI:20-45), standard/Berlin (n = 45) 31 months (95%CI:24-38,p = 0.747))., Conclusion: In this combined cohort, standard PVR was not associated with increased severe morbidity or mortality. After propensity score matching, survival was comparable after selective (Amsterdam) and standard PVR (Berlin)., (Copyright © 2021 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In this retrospective cohort study, the potential of gemcitabine (gem)/cisplatin (cis) chemotherapy as future preoperative therapy for patients with unresectable locally advanced or borderline resectable intrahepatic, perihilar, and mid-cholangiocarcinoma was investigated., Methods: All patients with intrahepatic, perihilar, and mid-cholangiocarcinoma presented at Amsterdam UMC between January 2016 and October 2019 were included. The radiologic response after 3 and/or 6 cycles of gem/cis chemotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced or borderline resectable disease was derived from the original radiologic reports and subsequently re-evaluated for surgical exploration by consensus reading of 2 HPB surgeons and 1 radiologist., Results: Overall, 65 of 364 patients had a locally advanced or borderline resectable disease. Twenty-eight patients were treated with palliative chemotherapy, including 25 (89.3%) patients who received more than 3 cycles. Twenty-two patients (88.0%) and 13 patients (46.4%) showed RECIST stable disease or partial response after 3 and 6 cycles of chemotherapy, respectively. Three patients experienced grade 3 adverse events. Consensus reading concluded that exploration could have been reconsidered in 7 of 28 patients (25.0%)., Conclusion: Gem/cis may be a safe and feasible preoperative treatment in initially unresectable locally advanced or borderline resectable cholangiocarcinoma. In addition, the findings of this study support to always rediscuss patients with stable or responsive disease in multidisciplinary team meetings to reconsider resection. Besides, prospective studies are needed to investigate this effect further and, based on these preliminary data, seem feasible in this setting., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Liver transplantation (LT) has been performed in a select group of patients presenting with unresectable or primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)-associated perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) in the Mayo Clinic with a reported 5-year overall survival (OS) of 53% on intention-to-treat analysis. The objective of this study was to estimate eligibility for LT in a cohort of pCCA patients in two tertiary referral centers., Methods: Patients diagnosed with pCCA between 2002 and 2014 were included from two tertiary referral centers in the Netherlands. The selection criteria used by the Mayo Clinic were retrospectively applied to determine the proportion of patients that would have been eligible for LT., Results: A total of 732 consecutive patients with pCCA were identified, of whom 24 (4%) had PSC-associated pCCA. Overall, 154 patients had resectable disease on imaging and 335 patients were ineligible for LT because of lymph node or distant metastases. An age limit of 70 years led to the exclusion of 50 patients who would otherwise be eligible for LT. After applying the Mayo Clinic criteria, only 34 patients (5%) were potentially eligible for LT. Median survival from diagnosis for these 34 patients was 13 months (95% CI 3-23)., Conclusion: Only 5% of all patients presenting with pCCA were potentially eligible for LT under the Mayo criteria. Without transplantation, a median OS of about 1 year was observed.

Background: According to international guidelines, induction therapy may be considered in selected patients with initially unresectable locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma. The criteria for (un)resectability in cholangiocarcinoma varies between studies and no consensus-based agreement is available about these criteria. By performing a systematic literature review, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of systemic induction therapy in initially unresectable locally advanced perihilar (pCCA) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) and summarize resectability criteria used across studies., Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane library to identify studies on systemic induction therapy in locally advanced pCCA and/or iCCA. The primary outcome was resection rate (RR) after induction therapy and secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR)., Results: Ten studies with a total of 1167 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Among these patients, 334 (28.6%) were treated with systemic induction therapy. Across the studies, different types of chemotherapy regimens were administered (e.g., gemcitabine (based) chemotherapy and 5-FU (based) chemotherapy). Only six studies provided sufficient data and were used to analyze pooled (radical) resection rates. After induction therapy, 94 patients (39.2%) underwent a resection, of which R0 resections (22.9%). Pooled data on OS showed, better OS for chemotherapy plus resection versus chemotherapy only (pooled HR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.19-0.50; P value < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Adequately selected patients with locally advanced pCCA or iCCA may benefit from induction therapy followed by surgical resection. Prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Outcomes for the four anatomical subtypes of biliary tract carcinoma (BTC) - intrahepatic, perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma (ICC, PHCC, DCC) and gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) - are often combined. However, large cohorts comparing short- and long-term outcomes for the anatomical subtypes of BTC are lacking., Methods: All patients who underwent resection for pathology proven ICC, PHCC, DCC or GBC (2000-2016) from a single Western high-volume center were retrospectively selected. Clinicopathological characteristics, short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the four anatomical subtypes., Results: Overall, 361 patients with resected BTC were included (33 ICC, 135 PHCC, 148 DCC, 45 GBC). Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher complications were 48%, 51%, 36% and 8% (p < 0.001) and 90-day mortality was 9%, 15%, 3%, 4% (p < 0.001), for ICC, PHCC, DCC, GBC. Median overall survival was 37, 42, 29 and 41 months (p = 0.722), for ICC, PHCC, DCC, GBC. Five-year survival ranged between 29% and 37%. Anatomical subtype was not an independent predictor for overall survival., Conclusion: In this large single-center cohort of resected BTC, major morbidity and 90-day mortality varied between the four anatomical subtypes of BTC, mainly due to differences in surgical approach However, a significant difference in overall survival was not detected., (Copyright © 2019 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)