Search

Objectives: To assess whether pooled sample testing with nucleic acid amplification tests was a potential alternative to three single-site sample testing to screen for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in asymptomatic men who have sex with men., Methods: We prospectively compared pooled sample testing with single-site sample testing in asymptomatic MSM. Self-obtained paired rectal samples, one gargle sample and one first-void urine sample were collected from participants to generate two sets of samples: one for pooled sample testing and the other for single-site testing. We used modified pooled sampling, which is defined as the use of gargle samples, instead of swabs, for the pooled sample to test for pharyngeal infection., Results: This study included 513 MSM. The positive rates of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae were 20.3% and 11.7%, respectively, for single-site sample testing. Compared with the sensitivity of single-site testing as the gold standard, the sensitivities of pooled sample testing for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae were 94.2% (95% CI 88.0% to 97.3%) and 98.3% (95% CI 90.9% to 99.9%), respectively. The concordance rate and kappa coefficient were 98.3% (95% CI 96.7% to 99.2%) and 0.945 (95% CI 0.859 to 1.000), respectively, for C. trachomatis and 98.8% (95% CI 90.1% to 100%) and 0.943 (95% CI 0.857 to 1.000), respectively, for N. gonorrhoeae ., Conclusions: The modified pooled sampling had a comparably high consistency with single-site sample testing. The results strongly suggest that the gargle sample is suitable as a part of pooled sample for STI screening of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae ., Competing Interests: Competing interests: SO has received research grants/materials from Gilead Sciences, MSD KK, CSL Behring and ViiV Healthcare, Co., and has received honorarium for lectures from MSD KK, Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare and Janssen Pharmaceutical, KK., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Rectal Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) infections have been neglected and epidemiological data are unavailable in Japan. Thus, we evaluated the prevalence and incidence of rectal CT/NG in a cohort of HIV-negative men who have sex with men (MSM), which was established at the National Center for Global Health and Medicine (NCGM), in Tokyo, Japan, in January 2017., Methods: HIV-negative MSM aged ≥16 years old were included. The prevalence of rectal CT/NG among HIV-negative MSM was compared with that among an existing HIV-positive MSM cohort at NCGM. The HIV-negative MSM cohort was examined for rectal and pharyngeal CT/NG every 3 months. Urethral CT/NG was evaluated at the physician's discretion. The incidences of CT/NG were evaluated in December 2018., Results: Of 502 MSM initially included in this study, 13 men were diagnosed with HIV infection at enrollment and were subsequently excluded from the analysis. We evaluated 561 HIV-positive MSM for rectal CT/NG. The mean ages of the two cohorts were 33.6 and 46.2 years old, respectively (p<0.001). The prevalences of rectal CT were 16.4% and 15.9% (p = 0.707) and the prevalences of rectal NG were 4.1% and 2.3% (p = 0.101), for the HIV-negative and HIV-positive MSM cohorts, respectively. Of 489 HIV-negative MSM, 328 were followed at least twice, with 261.1 person-years during the study period. The incidences of rectal CT/NG were 17.2 and 3.8/100 person-years and the incidences of pharyngeal CT/NG were 2.0 and 11.0/100 person-years for the two cohorts, respectively. Approximately 37.9% of incident cases were attributed to recurrent infection., Conclusions: The prevalence and incidence of rectal CT/NG were high among MSM in Tokyo, Japan, suggesting that urgent countermeasures for early diagnosis and treatment are necessary., Competing Interests: I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests. S.O. has received research grants/materials from Japan Tobacco/Trii Pharmaceutical, MSD K.K., and CSL Behring, and has received honoraria from Torii Pharmaceutical, Co., MSD K. K., Gilead Sciences., and ViiV Healthcare. H.G. has received honoraria from MSD K.K., Abbott Japan, Co., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Torii Pharmaceutical, Co., Roche Diagnostics K.K., and ViiV Healthcare. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Background Evidence on efficacy of high-dose ceftriaxone monotherapy for extragenital Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) infection is lacking. Methods A cohort of men who have sex with men (MSM) were tested for NG/ Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) every 3 months, in a single-center observational study in Tokyo, Japan. MSM aged > 19 years diagnosed with extragenital NG infection between 2017 and 2020 were included. A single dose of 1 g ceftriaxone monotherapy was provided, while dual therapy with a single oral dose of 1 g azithromycin or 100 mg doxycycline administered orally twice daily for 7 days were given, for those coinfected with CT, according to infected sites. Efficacy of these treatments was calculated by the number of NG-negative subjects at test-of-cure divided by the number of subjects treated. Fisher exact tests were used to compare the efficacy between the 2 groups. Results Of 320 cases diagnosed with extragenital NG, 208 were treated with monotherapy and 112 were treated with dual therapy. The efficacy against total, pharyngeal, and rectal infections was 98.1% (204/208, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 95.2–99.3%), 97.8% (135/138, 95% CI: 93.8–99.4%), and 98.6% (69/70, 95% CI: 92.3–99.9%), respectively, in the monotherapy group, whereas the corresponding efficacy in the dual therapy was 95.5% (107/112, 95% CI: 90.0–98.1%), 96.1% (49/51, 95% CI: 86.8–99.3%), and 95.1% (58/61, 95% CI: 86.5–98.7%), respectively. No significant difference in the corresponding efficacy was observed between the two groups (P  = .29, P  = .61, P  = .34, respectively). Conclusions High-dose ceftriaxone monotherapy is as effective as dual therapy for extragenital NG among MSM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To assess whether pooled sample testing with nucleic acid amplification tests was a potential alternative to three single-site sample testing to screen for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in asymptomatic men who have sex with men.Methods: We prospectively compared pooled sample testing with single-site sample testing in asymptomatic MSM. Self-obtained paired rectal samples, one gargle sample and one first-void urine sample were collected from participants to generate two sets of samples: one for pooled sample testing and the other for single-site testing. We used modified pooled sampling, which is defined as the use of gargle samples, instead of swabs, for the pooled sample to test for pharyngeal infection.Results: This study included 513 MSM. The positive rates of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae were 20.3% and 11.7%, respectively, for single-site sample testing. Compared with the sensitivity of single-site testing as the gold standard, the sensitivities of pooled sample testing for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae were 94.2% (95% CI 88.0% to 97.3%) and 98.3% (95% CI 90.9% to 99.9%), respectively. The concordance rate and kappa coefficient were 98.3% (95% CI 96.7% to 99.2%) and 0.945 (95% CI 0.859 to 1.000), respectively, for C. trachomatis and 98.8% (95% CI 90.1% to 100%) and 0.943 (95% CI 0.857 to 1.000), respectively, for N. gonorrhoeae.Conclusions: The modified pooled sampling had a comparably high consistency with single-site sample testing. The results strongly suggest that the gargle sample is suitable as a part of pooled sample for STI screening of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 7 days and azithromycin 1 g single dose for the treatment of rectal Chlamydia trachomatis infection among MSM in a real clinical setting.Methods: A prospective study was performed to compare the effectiveness of doxycycline and azithromycin for the treatment of rectal C. trachomatis among MSM in Tokyo, Japan. Subjects diagnosed with rectal C. trachomatis infection were treated and test-of-cure examination (TOC) was performed at least 3 weeks after the treatment. Treatment of rectal C. trachomatis infection was decided prospectively in a time-dependent manner; in the period between January 2017 and October 2018, azithromycin was administered to all subjects, whereas from October 2018 through March 2020, doxycycline was administered to all subjects. Effectiveness of these treatments was calculated by the number of rectal C. trachomatis-negative subjects at TOC divided by the number of subjects treated.Results: Two hundred and ninety-six MSM with rectal C. trachomatis infection were treated with azithromycin (80 patients) and doxycycline (216 patients) in a time-dependent manner. Of the 296 MSM, 274 (92.6%) were treated successfully [67 (83.7%, 95% CI = 79.6%-87.9%) in the azithromycin group versus 207 (95.8%, 95% CI = 94.5%-97.2%) in the doxycycline group, P < 0.001]. To evaluate factors associated with treatment failure, we performed logistic regression analysis. In univariate and multivariate analysis, only doxycycline treatment was inversely associated with treatment failure (OR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.084-0.976, P = 0.046).Conclusions: The treatment with doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 7 days was superior to that with azithromycin 1 g single dose for rectal C. trachomatis among MSM in a real-world setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]