1. Comparison between ultra‐homogenisation and ultrasound for extraction of phenolic compounds from teff ( Eragrostis tef (Zucc . ))
- Author
-
Evandro Bona, Suzana Lucy Nixdorf, Makoto Matsushita, Franciele Leila Giopato Viell, Sandra Terezinha Marques Gomes, and Tiago Bervelieri Madeira
- Subjects
chemistry.chemical_classification ,Chromatography ,010401 analytical chemistry ,Extraction (chemistry) ,Flavonoid ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,040401 food science ,01 natural sciences ,High-performance liquid chromatography ,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering ,0104 chemical sciences ,Solvent ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Rutin ,0404 agricultural biotechnology ,chemistry ,Polyphenol ,Myricetin ,Quercetin ,Food Science - Abstract
This study investigated the effect of the solvent composition on the extraction of phenolic compounds from teff grains and compared the efficiency between the techniques homogeniser‐assisted extraction (HAE) and ultrasound‐assisted extraction (UAE). The solvents used were water, ethanol and methanol, and the response analysed was the total phenolic content (TPC). The quantitative profile of polyphenols extracted was also determined by ultra‐performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC‐TQD). According to the optimisation, the maximum response was estimated at solvent ratios of 51:40:9 and 49:26:25 (water/ethanol/methanol, v/v/v) for HAE and UAE, respectively. Under optimal conditions, the extraction technique did not significantly influence the TPC extracted, but the TFC (total flavonoid content) and the antioxidant capacity were significantly higher when UAE was used. The phenolic acids p‐coumaric and protocatechuic and the flavonoids quercetin, rutin and myricetin were the main polyphenols extracted. Both techniques studied were efficient in extracting polyphenols from whole teff grains.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF