Search

Background and Objectives: Cervical cancer (CC) represents a significant health concern worldwide, particularly for younger women. Cold knife (CK) conization and carbon dioxide (CO2) laser conization are two techniques commonly used to remove pre-invasive lesions, offering a potential curative intent in cases of incidental diagnosis of CC. This study aimed to assess the clinical implications and pathological outcomes of CK vs. CO2 laser conization for pre-invasive lesions. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed women who underwent CO2 or CK conization for high-grade preinvasive lesions (CIN2/3, CIS and AIS) between 2010 and 2022. Patient demographics, surgical details and pathological outcomes were collected. Pregnancy outcomes, including composite adverse obstetric rates, and oncological follow-up data, were also obtained. Results: In all, 1270 women were included; of them, 1225 (96.5%) underwent CO2, and 45 (3.5%) underwent CK conization. Overall, the rate of positive endocervical or deep margins was lower with CO2 laser compared to CK (4.3% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.015). Incidental CC was diagnosed in 56 (4.4%) patients, with 35 (62.5%) squamous and 21 (46.6%) adenocarcinomas. In a multivariate regression model, the relative risk for positive endocervical or deep margins is significantly greater in cases of incidental diagnosis of CC (p < 0.01). In cases of incidental diagnosis of CC, we found that the probabilities of having either positive endocervical or deep margins after CO2 laser or CK conization are similar, with a higher risk in case of adenocarcinoma lesion. Among women with CC, 42 (75%) opted for radical treatment, while 14 (25%) underwent a follow-up. Only one woman (7.1%) in the follow-up group, who had undergone CK conization, experienced a composite adverse obstetric outcome. No recurrences were observed after a median follow-up of 53 months. Conclusions: CO2 laser conization achieved a lower positive margin rate overall. CK and CO2 conization appear to be equivalent oncological options for incidental CC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Cervical cancer (CC) represents a significant health concern worldwide, particularly for younger women. Cold knife (CK) conization and carbon dioxide (CO2) laser conization are two techniques commonly used to remove pre-invasive lesions, offering a potential curative intent in cases of incidental diagnosis of CC. This study aimed to assess the clinical implications and pathological outcomes of CK vs. CO2 laser conization for pre-invasive lesions. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed women who underwent CO2 or CK conization for high-grade preinvasive lesions (CIN2/3, CIS and AIS) between 2010 and 2022. Patient demographics, surgical details and pathological outcomes were collected. Pregnancy outcomes, including composite adverse obstetric rates, and oncological follow-up data, were also obtained. Results: In all, 1270 women were included; of them, 1225 (96.5%) underwent CO2, and 45 (3.5%) underwent CK conization. Overall, the rate of positive endocervical or deep margins was lower with CO2 laser compared to CK (4.3% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.015). Incidental CC was diagnosed in 56 (4.4%) patients, with 35 (62.5%) squamous and 21 (46.6%) adenocarcinomas. In a multivariate regression model, the relative risk for positive endocervical or deep margins is significantly greater in cases of incidental diagnosis of CC (p < 0.01). In cases of incidental diagnosis of CC, we found that the probabilities of having either positive endocervical or deep margins after CO2 laser or CK conization are similar, with a higher risk in case of adenocarcinoma lesion. Among women with CC, 42 (75%) opted for radical treatment, while 14 (25%) underwent a follow-up. Only one woman (7.1%) in the follow-up group, who had undergone CK conization, experienced a composite adverse obstetric outcome. No recurrences were observed after a median follow-up of 53 months. Conclusions: CO2 laser conization achieved a lower positive margin rate overall. CK and CO2 conization appear to be equivalent oncological options for incidental CC.

Copyright of Meandros Medical & Dental Journal is the property of Galenos Yayinevi Tic. LTD. STI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Aim: To evaluate the factors that influence the surgical margin state in patients undergoing cold knife conization at the University Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics in Skopje, Republic of Macedonia Materials and methods: We have retrospectively analyzed the medical records of all patients that underwent a cold knife conization at our Clinic in 2015. We cross-referenced the surgical margin state with the histopathological diagnosis (LSIL, HSIL or micro-invasive/invasive cancer), menopausal status of the patients, number of pregnancies, surgeon experience, operating time and cone depth. The data was analyzed with the Chi square test, Fisher’s exact test for categorical data and Student’s T test for continuous data and univariate and multivariate logistical regressions were performed. Results: A total of 246 medical records have neen analyzed, out of which 29 (11.79%) patients had LSIL, 194 (78.86%) had HSIL and 23 (9.34%) patients suffered micro-invasive/invasive cervical cancer. The surgical margins were positive in 78 (31.7%) of the patients. The average age of the patients was 41.13 and 35 (14.23%) of the patients were menopausal. The multivariate logistic regression identified preoperative forceps biopsy of micro-invasive SCC, HSIL or higher cone specimen histology and shorter cone depth as independent predictors of surgical margin involvement in patients undergoing cold knife conization. Conclusion: In the current study, we have found no association between the inherent characteristics of the patient and the surgeon and the surgical margin state after a CKC. The most important predictors for positive margins were the severity of the lesion and the cone depth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To identify predictive factors for residual disease in hysterectomy specimens after a loop electrical excision procedure (LEEP) or cold knife conization in early-stage cervical cancer.Study Design: A retrospective review was undertaken of the clinical records and pathology reports of 108 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with early invasive cervical cancer stage IA1 to IB1 by cold knife conization or LEEP, and underwent subsequent hysterectomy or radical hysterectomy at the Gynae-oncology Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital between 2000 and 2012. Residual disease was defined as the presence of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2-3 or invasive carcinoma in hysterectomy specimens. Clinicopathological factors associated with residual disease were analyzed. Risk factors for the prediction of residual disease were identified by univariate and multivariate analysis.Results: Residual disease was found in 32 (29.7%) patients. Stage, tumour size, depth of invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, ectocervical margin, endocervical margin, and combined ectocervical and endocervical margin were significantly associated with residual disease in hysterectomy specimens on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, depth of invasion (odds ratio 2.1, p=0.033) and combined margin status (odds ratio 10.8, p≤0.001) were independent risk factors for residual disease. In a subgroup analysis using depth of invasion ≤5mm and a negative combined margin, none (0%) of the 52 patients who met the criteria had residual disease.Conclusions: Conization (combined ectocervical and endocervical) margin and tumour depth of invasion are independent predictors of residual disease in hysterectomy specimens. A negative conization margin and depth of invasion ≤5mm are associated with low risk of residual disease in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To study the outcome of biopsy-diagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 in patients treated by loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) or cold knife cone biopsy (CKC). Material and Methods: Patients (n = 131) were analyzed for histological results on LEEP/CKC specimen. Demographic and risk factors, referral cytology, high risk human papilloma virus (HR HPV) test and follow-up colposcopic clinic visits were studied. Results: Excisional specimens from LEEP/CKC demonstrated no CIN in 20 (15%), CIN 1 in 17 (13%), CIN 2 in 57 (44%) and CIN 3 in 37 (28%). No invasive cancers were identified. The referral Pap smear was high grade or possible high grade in 52 (40%), low grade in 59 (45%) and inconclusive in 20 (15%). Fourteen patients (11%) had positive excisional margins, eight of the 14 were tested for HR HPV infection before LEEP, and all were positive. Post-treatment HPV testing was performed at the 12-month visit in 6 of the 14 patients who had positive excision margins, and all 6 tested were negative. Two women (1.5%) with clear margins had recurrence of CIN 2, both tested positive for HR HPV after treatment. Conclusion: Our data showed that a significant number of women (28%) with biopsy-diagnosed CIN 2 had CIN 1 or no dysplasia on subsequent excisional biopsy. The recurrence risk of high grade dysplasia in CIN 2 is low (1.5%). However, due to the high number of patients (72%) with high grade dysplasia at treatment biopsy, caution needs to be exercised when a conservative approach is adopted in the management of CIN 2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Collegium Antropologicum is the property of Croatian Anthropological Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Aim: To determine whether cold knife conization (CKC) or loop electrosurgical excisional procedure (LEEP) is the better option for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) under specific circumstances. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent CKC or LEEP for the treatment of CIN. The proportion of non-negative surgical margins between the two treatment groups was calculated based on their age, parity, previous mode of delivery, and grade of CIN. The Student's t-test and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to find the better option for the treatment of CIN under the specific circumstances. Results: A total of 118 patients were enrolled in the study. Between the two treatment groups, there was no significant difference in the overall proportion of non-negative surgical margins ( P > 0.05). The grade of CIN, the previous mode of delivery, and parity did not affect the surgical margin status. The CKC treatment group had a significantly lower incidence of non-negative surgical margins than the LEEP treatment group (14.3% vs. 52.6%, respectively; P < 0.05) in the patients >45 years of age. Based on multivariate analyses, LEEP was identified as a significant risk factor for non-negative surgical margins in the patients >45 years of age. Of the 11 patients with non-negative surgical margins who underwent a secondary procedure within 6 months of the initial CKC or LEEP, five patients (45.5%) had residual CIN II and III. Conclusions: In patients >45 years of age, CKC is the preferred treatment for CIN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of cold knife conization with electrocauterization and the feasibility of conservative management in patients with stage IA1 carcinoma of the cervix according to margin status after conization.Methods: Medical and histopathological records of 108 patients with stage IA1 cervical carcinoma were reviewed retrospectively. Patients underwent cold knife conization with electrocauterization or conization followed by hysterectomy. Disease recurrence was defined as a histologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or higher grade lesion.Results: Forty patients underwent conization followed by hysterectomy; of 27 women with positive margins, 14 (35%) had a residual lesion. Sixty-eight patients underwent conization without further surgical intervention. Forty patients had a negative resection margin without recurrence, while 28 had a positive resection margin: positive exocervical (n=11), positive endocervical (n=17). Among these, there were 7 cases of recurrence: positive exocervical (n=1); positive endocervical (n=6).Conclusion: Cold knife conization with electrocauterization appears to be a safe treatment option for patients with stage IA1 cervical carcinoma if careful follow-up is guaranteed for patients with CIN 3 exocervical resection margins. However, patients with CIN 3 endocervical resection margins should be managed surgically with repeat conization or hysterectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]