Back to Search Start Over

Cold Knife Versus Carbon Dioxide for the Treatment of Preinvasive Cervical Lesion.

Authors :
Ferrari, Federico
Bonetti, Emma
Oliveri, Giulia
Giannini, Andrea
Gozzini, Elisa
Conforti, Jacopo
Ferrari, Filippo Alberto
Salinaro, Federica
Tisi, Giancarlo
Ciravolo, Giuseppe
Favilli, Alessandro
Odicino, Franco
Source :
Medicina (1010660X); Jul2024, Vol. 60 Issue 7, p1056, 10p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Cervical cancer (CC) represents a significant health concern worldwide, particularly for younger women. Cold knife (CK) conization and carbon dioxide (CO<subscript>2</subscript>) laser conization are two techniques commonly used to remove pre-invasive lesions, offering a potential curative intent in cases of incidental diagnosis of CC. This study aimed to assess the clinical implications and pathological outcomes of CK vs. CO<subscript>2</subscript> laser conization for pre-invasive lesions. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed women who underwent CO<subscript>2</subscript> or CK conization for high-grade preinvasive lesions (CIN2/3, CIS and AIS) between 2010 and 2022. Patient demographics, surgical details and pathological outcomes were collected. Pregnancy outcomes, including composite adverse obstetric rates, and oncological follow-up data, were also obtained. Results: In all, 1270 women were included; of them, 1225 (96.5%) underwent CO<subscript>2</subscript>, and 45 (3.5%) underwent CK conization. Overall, the rate of positive endocervical or deep margins was lower with CO<subscript>2</subscript> laser compared to CK (4.3% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.015). Incidental CC was diagnosed in 56 (4.4%) patients, with 35 (62.5%) squamous and 21 (46.6%) adenocarcinomas. In a multivariate regression model, the relative risk for positive endocervical or deep margins is significantly greater in cases of incidental diagnosis of CC (p < 0.01). In cases of incidental diagnosis of CC, we found that the probabilities of having either positive endocervical or deep margins after CO<subscript>2</subscript> laser or CK conization are similar, with a higher risk in case of adenocarcinoma lesion. Among women with CC, 42 (75%) opted for radical treatment, while 14 (25%) underwent a follow-up. Only one woman (7.1%) in the follow-up group, who had undergone CK conization, experienced a composite adverse obstetric outcome. No recurrences were observed after a median follow-up of 53 months. Conclusions: CO<subscript>2</subscript> laser conization achieved a lower positive margin rate overall. CK and CO<subscript>2</subscript> conization appear to be equivalent oncological options for incidental CC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1010660X
Volume :
60
Issue :
7
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Medicina (1010660X)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178697246
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60071056