Search

Background: The optimal subsequent treatment strategy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and consolidative durvalumab therapy remains unknown. We aimed to determine the optimal subsequent treatment strategy for this clinical population., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 523 consecutive patients with LA-NSCLC treated with CRT and analyzed the treatment outcomes of subsequent therapy after progression following CRT and consolidative durvalumab therapy. Patients who received tyrosine kinase inhibitors as subsequent therapy were excluded., Results: Out of 122 patients who received subsequent chemotherapy, 55% underwent platinum-based, 25% non-platinum-based, and 20% immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-containing therapies. In the platinum-based group, patients with a durvalumab-progression-free survival (Dur-PFS) ≥ 1 year had a significantly longer median subsequent therapy-PFS (SubTx-PFS) than those with Dur-PFS < 1 year (13.2 months vs. 4.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.97; P = .04). Furthermore, among patients receiving non-platinum-based chemotherapy, the median SubTx-PFS was longer in the combined with angiogenesis inhibitor group than in the without group, although the difference was not statistically significant. No significant difference of SubTx-PFS was observed between the reason for durvalumab discontinuation and the outcomes of ICI-containing therapy., Conclusion: In clinical practice, platinum-based chemotherapy rechallenge is frequently employed following progression subsequent to CRT and consolidative durvalumab therapy for LA-NSCLC. Optimal treatment strategies may consider Dur-PFS and angiogenesis inhibitor feasibility. Further research is warranted to identify clinical biomarkers that can help identify patients who would benefit from ICI rechallenge., Competing Interests: Disclosure Hayato Kawachi reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Taiho Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. Motohiro Tamiya reported receiving personal fees from Amgen, Asahi Kasei Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, and Taiho Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. Yuko Oya reported receiving personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis Pharma KK, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited outside the submitted work. Go Saito reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo Company, MSD, Novartis Pharma KK, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, and Taiho Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. Yoshihiko Taniguchi reports receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD, and Ono Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. Hirotaka Matsumoto reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Kirin, MSD, Nippon Kayaku Co. Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited outside the submitted work. Yuki Sato reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis Pharma KK, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Nippon Kayaku, Kyowa Kirin, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited outside the submitted work. Taiichiro Otsuki reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai Co. Ltd., MSD, Nippon Kayaku Co. Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, and Tsumura & Co. outside the submitted work. Hidekazu Suzuki reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited outside the submitted work. Yasushi Fukuda reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck Biopharma, MSD, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Taiho Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. Satoshi Tanaka declares that he has no competing financial interests or personal relationships that would affect the research reported in this paper. Yoko Tsukita reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, MSD, and Taiho Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. Junji Uchida declares that he has no competing financial interests or personal relationships that would affect the research reported in this paper. Yoshihiko Sakata reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Eli Lilly, Kyowa KIRIN, MSD, Novartis Pharma KK, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited outside the submitted work. Yuki Nakatani declares that he has no competing financial interests or personal relationships that would affect the research reported in this paper. Ryota Shibaki reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD, and Taiho Pharmaceutical outside of the submitted work. Daisuke Arai reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Merck Biopharma Co. Ltd., MSD, Nippon Kayaku Co. Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited outside the submitted work. Asuka Okada reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Kyowa KIRIN, MSD, and Nippon Kayaku Co. Ltd. outside the submitted work. Satoshi Hara declares that he has no competing financial interests or personal relationships that would affect the research reported in this paper. Koichi Takayama reported receiving research grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical and Ono Pharmaceutical and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, MSD, and Merck outside the purview of the submitted work. Kazumi Nishino reported receiving grants from Ono, TAIHO, MSD, AbbVie, DAIICHI SANKYO, Amgen, Eisai, Sanofi, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Merck, Takeda, Chugai, and Merus; and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Nippon Boehringer Ingerheim, Nippon Kayaku, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: It is unclear how the duration and tapering pattern of corticosteroid therapy for pneumonitis changed after the introduction of durvalumab consolidation therapy., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of patients diagnosed with nonsmall cell lung cancer who received chemoradiotherapy between January 2014 and December 2020., Results: Data for 135 patients treated before durvalumab approval and 100 patients treated with durvalumab after its approval were analyzed. In both groups, more than 70% were male, with a median age of 66 y. Approximately 85% were smokers, and the most common tumor histology was adenocarcinoma. Most patients were treated with doses of 60 and 66 Gy (n = 127 [94%] vs. n = 95 [95%]). Among the patients treated with durvalumab, 57%, 38%, and 5% had grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 pneumonitis; none had grade 4 or 5 pneumonitis. Patients treated with durvalumab exhibited a longer duration of corticosteroid therapy for pneumonitis (17 wk; range: 2-88 wk) than patients not treated with durvalumab (7 wk; range: 0.4-21 wk; P < 0.001). Pneumonitis relapse was more frequent in patients treated with durvalumab (n = 8; 23%) than in patients not treated with durvalumab (n = 2; 7%). Among the 8 patients treated with durvalumab, 2 had recurrent pneumonitis, 1 could not terminate corticosteroids., Conclusions: Our data show that durvalumab prolongs the duration of corticosteroid therapy and increases the complexity of corticosteroid tapering patterns. This study can help manage pneumonitis caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors and other drugs used after chemoradiotherapy in routine practice and clinical trials., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr. Horinouchi has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, Eli Lilly, Ono, BMS, Chugai, Roche, Amgen, Abbvie and grants from MSD, Abbvie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Ono, Daiichi-Sankyo, Janssen, Chugai, Roche. Dr.Shinno has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, BMS, Chugai, Ono, Eli Lilly and grants from Ono, Janssen, Japan Clinical Research Operations, Taiho, Bayer Gilead. Dr.Okuma has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingerheim, Chugai, Ely-Lilly, Esai, Takeda, MSD and grants from AstraZeneca, MSD. Dr.Yoshida has received personal fees from Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, AstraZeneca, MSD, Chugai, BMS, Ono, Takeda, Pfizer, Lilly, Merck and grants from Novartis, Abbvie, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, AstraZeneca, MSD, Chugai, Astellas, Medpace, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Ono, Merck. Dr.Goto has received personal fees from Eli Lilly, Chugai, Taiho, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, MSD, Novartis. Merck, Thermo Fischer and grants from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ono, Novartis, Kyorin, DaiichiSankyo, Novartis. Dr.Yamamoto has received personal fees from Ono, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cmic, Merck, Healiosand and grants from Astellas, Chugai, Eisai, Taiho, BMS, Pfizer, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Abbvie, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Kyowa Kirin, Takeda, Ono, Janssen Pharma, MSD, Merck, GSK, Sumitomo Pharma, Chiome Bioscience, Otsuka, Carna Biosciences, Genmab, Shionogi, TORAY, KAKEN, AstraZeneca, Cmic, Inventis Bio, Rakuten Medical. Dr.Kusumoto has received personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneka and grants from Canon Medical Systems. Dr.Ohe has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Eli Lilly, ONO, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Pfizer, MSD, Taiho, Nippon Kayaku, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Eisai Daiichi-Sankyo and grants from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Lilly, ONO, BMS, Kyorin, Dainippon- Sumitomo, Pfizer, Taiho, Novartis, Takeda, Kissei, Daiichi-Sankyo, Janssen, LOXO. The remaining Authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The treatment of lung cancer has made dramatic progress in the past decade, but due to the high cost of drugs, the total pharmaceutical cost has been rising explosively. There are currently no data available in Japan on which regimens are used, to what extent they are used, and what their total cost is., Methods: Sixty Japanese centers belonging to the Lung Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group were surveyed for information about the first-line treatment for advanced lung cancer in practice from July 2021 to June 2022. Three types of cancer were included: driver gene mutation-negative NSCLC, EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, and extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC)., Results: Recent treatment costs for ICIs or ICI plus chemotherapy were about 20-55 times higher than those for conventional chemotherapy. Of the 3738 patients with driver gene aberration-negative NSCLC, 2573 (68.8%) received treatments with monthly cost of 500 000 Japanese yen (JPY) or more; 2555 (68.4%) received ICI therapy. Of the 1486 patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, 1290 (86.8%) received treatments with a monthly cost of 500 000 JPY or more; 1207 (81.2%) received osimertinib. ICI treatments with a monthly cost of 500 000 JPY or more were administered to 607 (56.3%) of 1079 patients with ES-SCLC. Elderly NSCLC patients received slightly more high-cost treatment than younger patients., Conclusion: Recent treatments cost many times more than conventional chemotherapy. This study revealed that high-cost treatments were widely used in advanced lung cancer and some of high-cost treatments were used despite the lack of clear evidence. Physicians should pay attention to the cost of treatments they use., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background/aim: Pneumonitis during durvalumab consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a major cause of treatment discontinuation. Although previous studies have revealed an association between antinuclear antibody (ANA) positivity and the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there are no reports on durvalumab consolidation therapy. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of durvalumab after CRT in ANA-positive patients., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with unresectable NSCLC treated with durvalumab after CRT between August 2018 and July 2022 at our institution. We evaluated the association among ANA positivity, treatment-related adverse events (AEs), and survival outcomes., Results: Overall, 80 patients were enrolled, 39 of whom were ANA-positive. Although there were no significant differences in the incidence of each AE of any grade, ANA-positive patients tended to have a higher frequency of pneumonitis of grade 3 to 5 than ANA-negative patients (12.8% vs. 2.4%, p=0.104). ANA-positive patients had a significantly shorter median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than ANA-negative patients [14.9 months vs. not reached (NR), p=0.005; NR vs. NR, p=0.013]. Multivariate analysis revealed that ANA positivity was an independent predictor of shorter PFS (HR=2.23; 95% CI=1.16-4.29; p=0.016) and OS (HR=2.28; 95% CI=1.01-5.12; p=0.046)., Conclusion: ANA-positive patients receiving durvalumab after CRT tended to have a higher frequency of severe pneumonitis and significantly worse PFS and OS compared with ANA-negative patients., (Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Lorlatinib, a third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, causes distinct adverse events (AEs), including hyperlipidemia and central nervous system (CNS) disorders. Although dose modifications are recommended to manage these AEs, whether dose modifications can achieve optimal blood lorlatinib concentrations and reduce the incidence of lorlatinib-induced AEs remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the association between lorlatinib exposure and AEs in each patient., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer treated with lorlatinib between November 2018 and July 2022. Serum lorlatinib concentrations were assessed using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. All AEs were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0., Results: The median age of the 55 eligible patients was 59 years (range: 23-79 years). All patients were administered lorlatinib after first line ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitor failure. Grade ≥ 3 AEs occurred in 25 patients (25/55, 45 %), including hyperlipidemia in 17 (17/55, 31 %), CNS disorders in 7 (7/55, 13 %), and edema in 6 (6/55, 11 %). Dose modification was required in 23 patients (23/55, 42 %). Among the 36 patients with available data on serum lorlatinib levels at day 28 (±14) and no drug dose modifications, lorlatinib serum concentrations were significantly higher in patients with grade ≥ 3 AEs than in those without AEs (median: 462 ng/mL vs. 177 ng/mL, p < 0.01). In eight patients with data on serial lorlatinib serum concentrations following dose modifications, lorlatinib serum concentrations were effectively reduced, facilitating the ongoing administration of lorlatinib. Additionally, no significant difference was observed in the landmark analysis of progression-free survival between patients with dose modification within the first 16 weeks and those without (median: 24.8 months vs. 10.1 months, p = 0.46)., Conclusion: Dose modification of lorlatinib was associated with successful management of AEs and decreased serum concentration of lorlatinib., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This exploratory integrated analysis of the randomized Phase III IMpower130 and IMpower132 trials evaluated the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were aged ≥75 years or had renal dysfunction., Materials and Methods: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage IV non-squamous NSCLC received atezolizumab-containing therapy or platinum-doublet chemotherapy in IMpower130 and IMpower132. This integrated analysis assessed efficacy (including overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS], and objective response rates) and safety in the integrated population and in patients ≥75 years old. Subgroup analyses by baseline creatinine clearance (<45, 45 to <60, and ≥60 mL/min) were conducted for each study population., Results: This integrated analysis included 1224 patients: 737 in the atezolizumab-containing group and 487 in the chemotherapy group. At data cutoff, the hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.54-0.71) in the integrated population and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.40-0.88) in the ≥75-years subgroup. The HR for OS was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.68-0.95) in the integrated population and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.39-1.07) in the ≥75-years subgroup. PFS and OS benefits with the atezolizumab combination vs chemotherapy were maintained across subgroups with varying renal function in IMpower130, and PFS benefits were maintained across subgroups in IMpower132., Conclusions: The results of this post hoc integrated analysis of IMpower130 and IMpower132 show that the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy is maintained in patients ≥75 years old and in patients with renal dysfunction., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Makoto Nishio declares honoraria from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Nippon Kayaku, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Takeda. Satoshi Watanabe declares grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Nippon Kayaku and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Kyowa Kirin, Merck, Novartis, Nippon Kayaku, Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical. Hibiki Udagawa declares grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Takeda. Naoko Aragane declares grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Eli Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Taiho Pharmaceutical; and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Guardant Health, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Taiho Pharmaceutical. Yuki Nakagawa and Yuki Kobayashi declare employment by and stock ownership in Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd. Haruhiro Saito declares grants from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, and Ono Pharmaceutical; and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Pfizer. All authors declare support from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd for third-party editorial assistance from professional medical writers., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) aberrations are observed in various cancers. In non-small cell lung cancer, genetic alterations activating HER2, mostly exon 20 insertion mutations, occur in approximately 2-4% of cases. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), a HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate has been approved as the first HER2-targeted drug for HER2-mutant lung cancer. However, some cases are not responsive to T-DXd and the primary resistant mechanism remains unclear. In this study, we assessed sensitivity to T-DXd in JFCR-007, a patient-derived HER2-mutant lung cancer cell line. Although JFCR-007 was sensitive to HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors, it showed resistance to T-DXd in attachment or spheroid conditions. Accordingly, we established a three-dimensional (3D) layered co-culture model of JFCR-007, where it exhibited a lumen-like structure and became sensitive to T-DXd. In addition, an in-house inhibitor library screening revealed that G007-LK, a tankyrase inhibitor, was effective when combined with T-DXd. G007-LK increased the cytotoxicity of topoisomerase-I inhibitor, DXd, a payload of T-DXd and SN-38. This combined effect was also observed in H2170, an HER2-amplified lung cancer cell line. These results suggest that the proposed 3D co-culture system may help in evaluating the efficacy of T-DXd and may recapitulate the tumor microenvironment., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Ryohei Katayama reports financial support was provided by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. Ryohei Katayama reports financial support was provided by Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development. Ryohei Katayama reports financial support was provided by the Nakatomi Foundation. Ryohei Katayama reports financial support was provided by Nippon Foundation. Ryohei Katayama reports financial support was provided by Takeda Science Foundation. Ryohei Katayama reports financial support was provided by Kobayashi Foundation for Cancer Research. Ken Uchibori reports financial support was provided by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. Akari Shiraishi reports financial support was provided by Japan Science and Technology Agency. Ryohei Katayama reports a relationship with Chugai Pharmaceutical Co Ltd that includes: funding grants. Ryohei Katayama reports a relationship with Toppan Inc that includes: funding grants. Yuki Takahashi reports a relationship with Toppan Inc that includes: employment. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We previously reported that combined therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) osimertinib and AXL inhibitor ONO-7475 is effective in preventing the survival of drug-tolerant cells in high-AXL-expressing EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. Nevertheless, certain residual cells are anticipated to eventually develop acquired resistance to this combination therapy. In this study, we attempted to establish a multidrug combination therapy from the first-line setting to overcome resistance to this combination therapy in high-AXL-expressing EGFR-mutated NSCLC. siRNA screening assay showed that fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) knockdown induced pronounced inhibition of cell viability in the presence of the osimertinib-ONO-7475 combination, which activates FGFR1 by upregulating FGF2 via the c-Myc pathway. Cell-based assays showed that triple therapy with osimertinib, ONO-7475, and the FGFR inhibitor BGJ398 significantly increased apoptosis by increasing expression of proapoptotic factor Bim and reduced cell viability compared with that observed for the osimertinib-ONO-7475 therapy. Xenograft models showed that triple therapy considerably suppressed tumor regrowth. A novel therapeutic strategy of additional initial FGFR1 inhibition may be highly effective in suppressing the emergence of osimertinib- and ONO-7475-resistant cells., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: T. Yamada received commercial research grants from Ono Pharmaceutical, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., AstraZeneca, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and speaking honoraria from Eli Lilly and Chugai-Roche. H. Kawachi received personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, and MSD outside the purview of the submitted work. A. Osoegawa received consultant honoraria from AstraZeneca and speaking honoraria from AstraZeneca, MSD Japan, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Ono Pharmaceutical. T. Sakai received research grants from Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Oncolys BioPharma and a patent fee from JT Pharmaceutical. T. Yasuhiro and R. Kozaki are paid employees of Ono Pharmaceutical. S. Yano received research grants from Chugai-Roche and Boehringer-Ingelheim and speaking honoraria from Amgen, Chugai-Roche, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, and Pfizer. K. Takayama received research grants from Chugai-Roche and Ono Pharmaceutical and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai-Roche, MSD-Merck, Eli Lilly, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Daiichi-Sankyo. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: The outcomes of lung cancer treatment have improved over time. However, in contrast to other treatments, the clinical outcomes of salvage surgery are seldom reported because the follow-up periods after salvage surgery are short., Patients and Methods: We conducted a comprehensive study involving consecutive patients who underwent salvage surgery at two different institutions. Our analysis encompassed the exploration of clinicopathological features, perioperative variables, and surgical outcomes. Additionally, we employed propensity score matching to compare the long-term survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent salvage surgery with those who received induction chemoradiotherapy prior to surgery., Results: Twenty-five patients underwent salvage procedures, while 113 patients received induction chemotherapy followed by surgery during the same study period. When assessing the overall survival (OS) from the registration date to the initial treatment date, the five-year OS rates were 73.8% in the induction group and 70.5% in the salvage surgery group (p=0.674). No significant differences were identified between the two groups in a cohort of 48 patients with NSCLC who were matched using propensity scores., Conclusion: In patients who underwent salvage surgery, reasonable long-term survival was achieved with outcomes comparable to those of induction chemotherapy followed by surgical resection., (Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Importance: The association between obesity and response to cancer treatment and survival remains unclear, with conflicting findings from various studies. The optimal choice between conventional chemotherapy and immunotherapy for first-line treatment remains uncertain in patients with obesity who potentially have an inadequate therapeutic response to immunotherapy., Objective: To investigate whether body mass index (BMI) modifies the association of immunotherapy or conventional therapy with overall survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC)., Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study, using administrative claims data obtained from advanced treatment centers in Japan, was conducted between December 1, 2015, and January 31, 2023. Participants included individuals aged 18 years or older with aNSCLC who received immunotherapy, using immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment or conventional chemotherapy., Exposure: Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy as first-line chemotherapy was compared with conventional chemotherapy, identified through patient medical records., Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was overall survival. Survival analysis covered a 3-year follow-up period after the first-line chemotherapy., Results: A total of 31 257 patients with aNSCLC were identified. Of these, 12 816 patients received ICI therapy (mean [SD] age, 70.2 [9.1] years; 10 287 [80.3%] men) and 18 441 patients received conventional chemotherapy (mean [SD] age, 70.2 [8.9] years; 14 139 [76.7%] men). Among patients with BMI less than 28, ICI therapy was associated with a significantly lower hazard of mortality (eg, BMI 24: hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.87) compared with those who underwent conventional chemotherapy. However, no such association was observed among patients with BMI 28 or greater (eg, BMI 28: HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81-1.00)., Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this retrospective cohort study suggest that BMI modifies the association of ICI therapy compared with conventional chemotherapy with overall survival in patients with aNSCLC. A lack of association between ICI therapy and improved survival in patients with aNSCLC and overweight or obesity compared with conventional chemotherapy was observed. This suggests that ICI therapy may not be the optimal first-line therapy for patients with overweight or obesity and the use of conventional chemotherapy should also be considered in such patients.

Osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), is routinely prescribed as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer, regardless of the presence of the T790M resistance mutation. This study reports a rare case of Factor V inhibitor detection during osimertinib therapy in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma. These findings underscore the importance of vigilant monitoring for coagulation abnormalities during EGFR-TKI therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Several studies explored the association between thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) and the therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapy. However, the effect of TTF-1 on the therapeutic efficacy of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor/chemoimmunotherapy in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (non-Sq NSCLC) with a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score of 50% or more who are highly susceptible to immunotherapy remains unresolved. Therefore, we evaluated whether TTF-1 has a clinical impact on this population., Methods: Patients with non-Sq NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression who received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy between May 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Treatment efficacy was compared after adjusting for baseline differences using propensity score matching., Results: Among the 446 patients with NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression, 266 patients with non-Sq NSCLC were analyzed. No significant differences in therapeutic efficacy were observed between the TTF-1-positive and -negative groups in the overall and propensity score-matched populations. Of chemoimmunotherapy, pemetrexed containing regimen significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared to chemoimmunotherapy without pemetrexed, regardless of TTF-1 expression (TTF1 positive; HR: 0.46 (95% Confidence interval: 0.26-0.81), p<0.01, TTF-1 negative; HR: 0.29 (95% Confidence interval: 0.09-0.93), p=0.02)., Discussion: TTF-1 expression did not affect the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy in patients with non-Sq NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression. In this population, pemetrexed-containing chemoimmunotherapy demonstrated superior anti-tumor efficacy, irrespective of TTF-1 expression., Competing Interests: NN received personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., AstraZeneca KK., Eli Lilly Japan KK, and MSD KK outside the purview of the submitted work. HK received personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., AstraZeneca KK, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan KK, and MSD KK outside the purview of the submitted work. TY received research grants from Ono Pharmaceutical, Janssen, AstraZeneca, and Takeda Pharmaceutical and has received speaking honoraria from Eli Lilly and Chugai Pharmaceutical outside the purview of the submitted work. MT received research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Chugai Pharmaceutical and Janssen, and personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Asahi Kasei Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Bayer, Amgen, Kyowa-Kirin, and Nippon Kayaku, outside the purview of the submitted work. AO has received personal fees from Chugai-Roshe, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Japan, Nippon Kayaku, and Bristol Myers Squibb outside the purview of the submitted work. TK received personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and MSD KK outside the purview of the submitted work. KCT received research grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical and Ono Pharmaceutical and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD-Merck, Eli Lilly, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Daiichi-Sankyo outside the purview of the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Nishioka, Kawachi, Yamada, Tamiya, Negi, Goto, Nakao, Shiotsu, Tanimura, Takeda, Okada, Harada, Date, Chihara, Hasegawa, Tamiya, Masui, Sai, Ishida, Katayama, Morimoto, Iwasaku, Tokuda, Kijima and Takayama.)

Background/aim: Nivolumab and ipilimumab combination therapy has been extensively explored for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through the pivotal phase III trials CheckMate 227 and CheckMate 9LA. However, the relationship between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and the effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab-based therapy in a real-world clinical setting remains uncertain., Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 28 patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC who underwent treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, with or without platinum-doublet chemotherapy, from February 2021 to January 2023. The primary objective was to elucidate the clinical association between irAEs and treatment efficacy associated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab-based therapy., Results: Among the 28 patients, 22 (78.6%) experienced irAEs. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer for patients with irAEs than for those without (p=0.0158), as was overall survival (OS) (p=0.000394). The severity of irAEs had no significant influence on PFS or OS. The objective response rate tended to be higher in patients with irAEs than in those without (50.0% versus 0.0%, respectively; p=0.0549). Multivariate analysis indicated that irAE occurrence was an independent factor for improved PFS (hazard ratio=0.2084, p=0.01383) and OS (hazard ratio=0.0857, p=0.001588). Interstitial lung disease was inferior to other irAE profiles for both PFS and OS., Conclusion: Patients with advanced NSCLC experiencing irAEs demonstrated superior clinical outcomes when treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab-based therapy compared with those without irAEs. However, immune-related interstitial lung disease may be less linked with PFS and OS than other irAE profiles., (Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Runt-related transcription factor (RUNX) proteins are considered to play various roles in cancer. Here, we evaluated the anticancer activity of Chb-M' , a compound that specifically and covalently binds to the consensus sequence for RUNX family proteins, in p53 -mutated non-small cell lung cancer cells. Chb-M' killed the cancer cells by inducing apoptosis. The compound showed an anticancer effect comparable to that of the clinically used drugs alectinib and ceritinib in vivo. Notably, Chb-M' extended the cancer-free survival of mice after ending treatment more effectively than did the other two drugs. The results presented here suggest that Chb-M' is an attractive candidate as an anticancer drug applicable to the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer and various other types of cancers.

Background: A history of pre-administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors has been reported to be associated with good outcomes of ramucirumab (RAM) plus docetaxel (DOC) combination therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, existing knowledge on the clinical significance of RAM and DOC following combined chemoimmunotherapy is limited. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of RAM plus DOC therapy after combined chemoimmunotherapy and attempted to identify the predictors of its outcomes., Patients and Methods: This multicenter, prospective study investigated the efficacy and safety of RAM plus DOC after combined chemoimmunotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and incidence of adverse events. An exploratory analysis measured serum cytokine levels at the start of treatment., Results: Overall, 44 patients were enrolled from 10 Japanese institutions between April 2020 and June 2022. The median PFS and OS were 6.3 and 22.6 months, respectively. Furthermore, the ORR and DCR were 36.4% and 72.7%, respectively. The high vascular endothelial growth factor D (VEGF-D) group had a significantly shorter PFS and OS. A combination of high VEGF-A and low VEGF-D levels was associated with a longer PFS., Conclusion: Our results showed that RAM plus DOC after combined chemoimmunotherapy might be an effective and relatively feasible second-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC in a real-world setting., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Combination therapy with docetaxel (DTX) and ramucirumab (RAM) has been used as a second-line treatment for advanced or recurrent lung cancer. However, there is insufficient evidence regarding the safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in older patients., Objective: This multicenter retrospective study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of second-line treatment regimens in older patients with advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 145 patients aged ≥ 70 years with advanced or recurrent NSCLC treated with second-line chemotherapy after platinum-based therapy between April 1, 2016, and March 31, 2021. Patients were subdivided into the DTX + RAM (n = 38) and single-agent (n = 107) groups., Results: The median time to treatment failure was 6.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6-9.6) in the DTX + RAM group and 2.3 months (95% CI 1.7-3.0) in the single-agent group (p < 0.01). The median overall survival was 15.9 months (95% CI 12.3-Not Achieved) in the DTX + RAM group and 9.4 months (95% CI 6.9-15.1) in the single-agent group (p = 0.01). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events frequency was not significantly different between the two groups, except for edema. Patients in the DTX + RAM group who did not discontinue treatment owing to adverse events exhibited the most favorable prognosis., Conclusions: These findings suggest that the DTX + RAM combination is an effective second-line therapy for older patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC, offering favorable efficacy without treatment discontinuation owing to adverse events., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Introduction: Programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression is a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death receptor-1/PD-L1 antibodies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although several assays have been approved for evaluating PD-L1 expression status, inter-assay discordance has been observed between some assays. The clinical significance of these discrepancies is still unclear., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed treatment-naïve NSCLC patients whose PD-L1 expression was evaluated using both 22C3 and SP142 assays. Among those, efficacy analysis was performed for patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 50 % (22C3), who had received first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy. Additionally, transcriptome analysis was conducted in the available tumors with TPS ≥ 50 % to investigate the distinct immune profiles that accompany inter-assay discordance., Results: In total, 611 patients were eligible. Among 198 patients with TPS ≥ 50 %, 91 (46 %) had tumor cell score ≤ 1 (SP142, i.e., inter-assay discrepancy). In the 52 patients who received first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy, treatment efficacy was significantly lower in patients with the discrepancy than that in those without (objective response rate: 18 % vs. 83 %, p < 0.001; median progression-free survival [months]: 3.2 vs. 8.3, p < 0.001). Transcriptome analysis revealed significantly more CD274 splice variants with aberrant 3'-terminal sequences in tumors with the inter-assay discrepancy than in those without., Conclusion: The inter-assay discrepancy in the PD-L1 status of tumor cells between the 22C3 and SP142 assays, reflecting an imbalance in the CD274 splice variants, could be a biomarker for primary resistance against pembrolizumab monotherapy in high PD-L1-expressing NSCLCs., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lung resection is the standard of care for patients with clinical stage I/II non-small cell lung cancer. This surgery reduces both the duration and quality of patients' daily ambulatory activities 1 month after surgery. However, little is known about physical activity after lung resection in patients with lung cancer. To evaluate the recovery process of physical activity with pulmonary rehabilitation in patients after lung resection and examine whether physical activity is affected by age., Methods: In this prospective, observational study, we measured and analysed participants' postoperative physical activity using a uniaxial accelerometer daily from postoperative day 1 to 30., Findings: We analysed 99 patients who underwent thoracic surgery. The number of walking steps significantly increased until day 4 and then reached a plateau thereafter. The duration of exercise at <3 metabolic equivalents significantly increased until day 3, and no significant difference was observed thereafter. Exercise at >3 metabolic equivalents significantly increased until day 4 and reached a plateau thereafter. A significant correlation was observed between age and number of steps after day 4. Compared with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, thoracotomy significantly decreased the number of steps from day 3 to 4., Interpretation: We found that the level of physical activity varied by index in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent lung resection. Age and surgical procedure affect different periods with the increase in post-operative walking steps., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Shinichi Arizono reports grants from Hoshi Iryo-Sanki Co. Ltd. and NPO Central Japan Lung Study Group outside the submitted work. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests. Shinichi Arizono reports a relationship with Hoshi Iryo-Sanki Co. Ltd. and NPO Central Japan Lung Study Group that includes: funding grants., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Driver oncogenes are investigated upfront at diagnosis using multi-CDx systems with next-generation sequencing techniques or multiplex reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assays. Additionally, from 2019, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) assays have been available in Japan for patients with advanced solid tumors who had completed or were expected to complete standard chemotherapy. These assays are expected to comprehensively detect the driver oncogenes, especially for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there are no reports of nationwide research on the detection of driver oncogenes in patients with advanced NSCLC who undergo CGP assays, especially in those with undetected driver oncogenes at diagnosis. In this study, we investigated the proportion of driver oncogenes detected in patients with advanced NSCLC with undetectable driver oncogenes at initial diagnosis and in all patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent CGP assays. We retrospectively analyzed data from 986 patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent CGP assays between August 2019 and March 2022, using the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database. The proportion of driver oncogenes newly detected in patients with NSCLC who tested negative for driver oncogenes at diagnosis and in all patients with NSCLC were investigated. Driver oncogenes were detected in 451 patients (45.7%). EGFR was the most common (16.5%), followed by KRAS (14.5%). Among the 330 patients with undetected EGFR, ALK, ROS1, and BRAF V600E mutations at diagnosis, 81 patients (24.5%) had newly identified driver oncogenes. CGP assays could be useful to identify driver oncogenes in patients with advanced NSCLC, including those initially undetected, facilitating personalized treatment., (© 2024 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Purpose: The gut microbiota is hypothesized as a prognostic biomarker for cancer immunotherapy. Antibiotic-induced dysbiosis negatively affects the clinical outcomes of immunotherapy. However, the effect of dysbiosis on the efficacy and safety of Chemoimmunotherapy (chemo-IOs), the frontline standard of care, in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unknown. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of chemo-IOs in patients exposed to antibiotics before treatment with those of patients who were not exposed., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced NSCLC treated with first-line chemo-IOs between 2018 and 2020 at the National Cancer Center Hospital. The patients were divided into two groups: those exposed to antibiotics within 30 days before induction therapy (ABx group) and those did not antibiotics (Non-ABx group). Propensity score matching was used to control for potential confounding factors. Clinical outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were compared., Results: Of 201 eligible patients, 21 were in the ABx group, and 42 were in the non-ABx group after propensity score matching. No differences in PFS or OS emerged between the two groups (ABx group vs. Non-ABx group) (PFS:7.0 months vs. 6.4 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-1.63, OS:20.4 months vs. 20.1 months, HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.44-1.71). The frequency of irAEs before propensity score matching was similar across any-grade irAEs (39.4% vs. 42.9%) or grade 3 or higher irAEs (9.1% vs. 11.3%)., Conclusion: Antibiotic-induced dysbiosis may not affect the efficacy of chemo-IOs in patients with advanced NSCLC., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Recently, novel Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) inhibitors have been clinically developed to treat KRAS G12C-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, achieving complete tumor remission is challenging. Therefore, the optimal combined therapeutic intervention with KRAS G12C inhibitors has a potentially crucial role in the clinical outcomes of patients. We investigated the underlying molecular mechanisms of adaptive resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitors in KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC cells to devise a strategy preventing drug-tolerant cell emergence. We demonstrate that AXL signaling led to the adaptive resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitors in KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC, activation of which is induced by GAS6 production via YAP. AXL inhibition reduced the viability of AXL-overexpressing KRAS G12C-mutated lung cancer cells by enhancing KRAS G12C inhibition-induced apoptosis. In xenograft models of AXL-overexpressing KRAS G12C-mutated lung cancer treated with KRAS G12C inhibitors, initial combination therapy with AXL inhibitor markedly delayed tumor regrowth compared with KRAS G12C inhibitor alone or with the combination after acquired resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitor. These results indicated pivotal roles for the YAP-GAS6-AXL axis and its inhibition in the intrinsic resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitor., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest T. Yamada received commercial research grants from Pfizer, Ono Pharmaceutical, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., AstraZeneca, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and has received speaking honoraria from Eli Lilly. H. Kawachi received personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., AstraZeneca KK, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan KK, and MSD KK, outside the purview of the submitted work. N. Furuya received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Taiho, and Novartis. S. Watanabe received grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Nippon Kayaku. Personal fees from Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis Pharma, AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharma, Bristol-Myers, Ono Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, and Taiho Pharmaceutical. S. Yano received research grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical and Boehringer-Ingelheim and has received speaking honoraria from Amgen, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, and Pfizer. T. Sakai received research grants from Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical and Oncolys BioPharma, and a patent fee from JT Pharmaceutical. K. Takayama reports receiving research grants from Chugai-Roche Co., and Ono Pharmaceutical Co., and personal fees from AstraZeneca Co., Chugai-Roche Co., MSD-Merck Co., Eli Lilly Co., Boehringer-Ingelheim Co., and Daiichi-Sankyo Co.No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab is one of the first-line treatments for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the safety and efficacy in patients on hemodialysis (HD) is unclear. We herein report a patient with NSCLC on HD in whom nivolumab and ipilimumab were initiated. We observed general deterioration and enlarged lesions, followed by a long-term response. The patient developed secondary hypoadrenocorticism, an immune-related adverse event that was easily controlled. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab can be used safely for patients with NSCLC on HD. Long-term effectiveness can be observed after initial progression, so we should carefully assess the response.

Introduction: Adjuvant immunotherapy (IO) following concurrent chemotherapy and photon radiation therapy confers an overall survival (OS) benefit for patients with inoperable locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (LA-NSCLC); however, outcomes of adjuvant IO after concurrent chemotherapy with proton beam therapy (CPBT) are unknown. We investigated OS and toxicity after CPBT with adjuvant IO versus CPBT alone for inoperable LA-NSCLC., Materials and Methods: We analyzed 354 patients with LA-NSCLC who were prospectively treated with CPBT with or without adjuvant IO from 2009 to 2021. Optimal variable ratio propensity score matching (PSM) matched CPBT with CPBT + IO patients. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank tests. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression evaluated the effect of IO on disease outcomes., Results: Median age was 70 years; 71 (20%) received CPBT + IO and 283 (80%) received CPBT only. After PSM, 71 CPBT patients were matched with 71 CPBT + IO patients. Three-year survival rates for CPBT + IO vs CPBT were: OS 67% vs 30% (P < 0.001) and PFS 59% vs 35% (P = 0.017). Three-year LRFS (P = 0.137) and DMFS (P = 0.086) did not differ. Receipt of adjuvant IO was a strong predictor of OS (HR 0.40, P = 0.001) and PFS (HR 0.56, P = 0.030), but not LRFS (HR 0.61, P = 0.121) or DMFS (HR 0.61, P = 0.136). There was an increased incidence of grade ≥3 esophagitis in the CPBT-only group (6% CPBT + IO vs 17% CPBT, P = 0.037)., Conclusion: This study, one of the first to investigate CPBT followed by IO for inoperable LA-NSCLC, showed that IO conferred survival benefits with no increased rates of toxicity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by durvalumab consolidation for up to 12 months is the standard of care for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, exactly when to initiate durvalumab therapy after chemoradiation completion remains unknown. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of durvalumab, administered immediately after CCRT completion, for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC., Patients and Methods: This study was a prospective, single-arm, open-label phase II clinical trial. Patients without disease progression after definitive CCRT (two cycles of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy with 60 Gy/30 Fr radiotherapy) received durvalumab (every 2 weeks for up to 12 months) from the next day (up to 5 days) after the final radiation dose. The primary endpoint was the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) from registration before the start of CCRT., Results: From January 2020 to August 2020, 47 of 50 enrolled patients were evaluable for treatment efficacy and safety. The 1-year PFS from registration was 75.0% [60% confidence interval (CI), 69.0-80.0 and 95% CI, 59.4-85.3]. The objective response rate throughout the study treatment and median PFS from registration were 78.7% and 14.2 months (95% CI, 13.4 to not reached), respectively. Grade 3/4 pneumonitis and febrile neutropenia were each 4.3%., Conclusions: Our study met the primary endpoint. The incidence of pneumonitis was similar to that of a Japanese subset in the PACIFIC study. Our data support the efficacy and safety of durvalumab administered immediately after the completion of CCRT for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Importance: The combination of an antibody to programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or to its ligand (PD-L1) with chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Bevacizumab is expected to enhance the efficacy not only of chemotherapy but also of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies through blockade of vascular endothelial growth factor-mediated immunosuppression, but further data are needed to support this., Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab administered with platinum combination therapy and atezolizumab in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC., Design, Setting, and Participants: An open-label phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 37 hospitals in Japan. Patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC without genetic driver alterations or those with genetic driver alterations who had received treatment with at least 1 approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor were enrolled between January 20, 2019, and August 12, 2020., Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either atezolizumab plus carboplatin with pemetrexed (APP) or atezolizumab, carboplatin plus pemetrexed, and bevacizumab (APPB). After 4 cycles of induction therapy, maintenance therapy with atezolizumab plus pemetrexed or with atezolizumab, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab was administered until evidence of disease progression, development of unacceptable toxic effects, or the elapse of 2 years from the initiation of protocol treatment., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population., Results: A total of 412 patients were enrolled (273 men [66%]; median age, 67.0 [range, 24-89] years) and randomly assigned, with 205 in the APPB group and 206 in the APP group of the ITT population after exclusion of 1 patient for good clinical practice violation. The median BICR-assessed PFS was 9.6 months with APPB vs 7.7 months with APP (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.07; 1-sided stratified log-rank test; P = .92). According to prespecified subgroup analysis of BICR-assessed PFS, an improved PFS with APPB vs APP was apparent specifically in driver oncogene-positive patients (median, 9.7 vs 5.8 months; stratified HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.98). Toxic effects related to bevacizumab were increased in the APPB group., Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this trial did not show superiority of APPB over APP for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC; however, this regimen showed a similar tolerability and improved survival relative to APP in patients with driver oncogenes., Trial Registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCT2080224500.

Alectinib is the first-line therapy for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Although some guidelines have recommended using other anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors after alectinib failure, evidence for such regimens in patients who fail to respond to alectinib is limited. This study involved using administrative claims data from acute care hospitals in Japan. We extracted the data of 634 patients diagnosed with lung cancer between September 1, 2014, and January 31, 2023, who received alectinib treatment before treatment with another anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor. We assessed distributions of patients according to their treatment sequencing and prognosis among three periods defined based on the initial marketing dates of lorlatinib and brigatinib. The type of anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors after alectinib failure changed over time. In the most recent period, lorlatinib (58%) and brigatinib (40%) became predominant. Two-year overall survival improved over time (47%-84%), accompanied by an increased 2-year proportion of patients who continuously used anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors after alectinib failure (13%-44%). The times to treatment discontinuation of the regimen between patients treated with lorlatinib and brigatinib were similar, with a hazard ratio of 1.02 (95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.64) in the period after marketing brigatinib. This study provides insights into the evolving treatment landscape for patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer who experience failed alectinib treatment and highlights the need for further studies and data accumulation to determine the optimal treatment strategy., (© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Introduction: The proportion of older patients diagnosed with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been increasing. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy (MONO) and combination therapy of ICI and chemotherapy (COMBO) are standard treatments for patients with NSCLC and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion scores (TPS) ≥ 50%. However, evidence from the clinical trials specifically for older patients is limited. Thus, it is unclear which older patients benefit more from COMBO than MONO., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 199 older NSCLC patients of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-1 and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% who were treated with MONO or COMBO. We analyzed the association between treatment outcomes and baseline patient characteristics in each group, using propensity score matching., Results: Of the 199 patients, 131 received MONO, and 68 received COMBO. The median overall survival (OS; MONO: 25.2 vs. COMBO: 42.2 months, P = 0.116) and median progression-free survival (PFS; 10.9 vs. 11.8 months, P = 0.231) did not significantly differ between MONO and COMBO group. In the MONO group, OS was significantly shorter in patients without smoking history compared to those with smoking history [HR for smoking history against non-smoking history: 0.36 (95% CI: 0.16-0.78), P = 0.010]. In the COMBO group, OS was significantly shorter in patients with PS 1 than those with PS 0 [HR for PS 0 against PS 1: 3.84 (95% CI: 1.44-10.20), P = 0.007] and for patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SQ) compared to non-squamous cell carcinoma (non-SQ) [HR for SQ against non-SQ: 0.17 (95% CI: 0.06-0.44), P < 0.001]. For patients with ECOG PS 0 (OS: 26.1 months vs. not reached, P = 0.0031, PFS: 6.5 vs. 21.7 months, P = 0.0436) or non-SQ (OS: 23.8 months vs. not reached, P = 0.0038, PFS: 10.9 vs. 17.3 months, P = 0.0383), PFS and OS were significantly longer in the COMBO group., Conclusions: ECOG PS and histological type should be considered when choosing MONO or COMBO treatment in older patients with NSCLC and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%., Competing Interests: HK received personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., AstraZeneca KK, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan KK, and MSD KK outside the purview of the submitted work. TY received research grants from Ono Pharmaceutical, Janssen, AstraZeneca, and Takeda Pharmaceutical, and has received speaking honoraria from Eli Lilly outside the purview of the submitted work. MT received research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., and Janssen and personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Asahi Kasei Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Bayer, Amgen, Kyowa-Kirin, and Nippon Kayaku outside the purview of the submitted work. AO received personal fees from Chugai-Roshe, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly Japan, Nippon Kayaku, and Bristol-Myers Squibb outside the purview of the submitted work. TK received personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and MSD KK outside the purview of the submitted work. KT received research grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and Ono Pharmaceutical and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., MSD-Merck, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Daiichi-Sankyo outside the purview of the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be constructed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Takei, Kawachi, Yamada, Tamiya, Negi, Goto, Nakao, Shiotsu, Tanimura, Takeda, Okada, Harada, Date, Chihara, Hasegawa, Tamiya, Katayama, Nishioka, Morimoto, Iwasaku, Tokuda, Kijima and Takayama.)

Background: In small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) could be a promising biomarker for immunotherapy, but objectively evaluating TIME remains challenging. Hence, we aimed to develop a predictive biomarker of immunotherapy efficacy through a machine learning analysis of the TIME., Methods: We conducted a biomarker analysis in a prospective study of patients with extensive-stage SCLC who received chemoimmunotherapy as the first-line treatment. We trained a model to predict 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) using pathological images (H&E, programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and double immunohistochemical assay (cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8) and forkhead box P3 (FoxP3)) and patient information. The primary outcome was the mean area under the curve (AUC) of machine learning models in predicting the 1-year PFS., Results: We analyzed 100,544 patches of pathological images from 78 patients. The mean AUC values of patient information, pathological image, and combined models were 0.789 (range 0.571-0.982), 0.782 (range 0.750-0.911), and 0.868 (range 0.786-0.929), respectively. The PFS was longer in the high efficacy group than in the low efficacy group in all three models (patient information model, HR 0.468, 95% CI 0.287 to 0.762; pathological image model, HR 0.334, 95% CI 0.117 to 0.628; combined model, HR 0.353, 95% CI 0.195 to 0.637). The machine learning analysis of the TIME had better accuracy than the human count evaluations (AUC of human count, CD8-positive lymphocyte: 0.681, FoxP3-positive lymphocytes: 0.626, PD-L1 score: 0.567)., Conclusions: The spatial analysis of the TIME using machine learning predicted the immunotherapy efficacy in patients with SCLC, thus supporting its role as an immunotherapy biomarker., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships, which may be considered potential competing interests. DF has received personal fees from AstraZeneca KK, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan; Ono Pharmaceutical; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Taiho Pharmaceutical; Chugai Pharmaceutical; MSD KK; Eli Lilly Japan KK; Kyowa Kirin; and Novartis Pharma KK, outside of the submitted work. YKitamura is the chief executive officer of N Lab Co., Ltd and its stockholder. JF is an advisor of N Lab Co., Ltd. YS has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Novartis, Pizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Nippon Kayaku, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Takeda, and Kyowa Kirin, outside of the submitted work. TK has received personal fees and scholarship donations from Chugai Pharmaceutical, outside of the submitted work. HM has received personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical, outside of the submitted work. TY has received personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical, outside of the submitted work. SM has received personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Boehringer-Ingelheim Japan, and Takeda Pharmaceutical, outside of the submitted work. AH has received personal fees from Chugai outside of this study, outside of the submitted work. YT has received personal fees from Chugai outside of this study, outside of the submitted work. HT has received personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim Japan, and Pfizer Japan, outside of the submitted work. NY has received research funds from Chugai Pharmaceutical, outside of the submitted work., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: Accurate and comprehensive segmentation of cardiac substructures is crucial for minimizing the risk of radiation-induced heart disease in lung cancer radiotherapy. We sought to develop and validate deep learning-based auto-segmentation models for cardiac substructures., Materials and Methods: Nineteen cardiac substructures (whole heart, 4 heart chambers, 6 great vessels, 4 valves, and 4 coronary arteries) in 100 patients treated for non-small cell lung cancer were manually delineated by two radiation oncologists. The valves and coronary arteries were delineated as planning risk volumes. An nnU-Net auto-segmentation model was trained, validated, and tested on this dataset with a split ratio of 75:5:20. The auto-segmented contours were evaluated by comparing them with manually drawn contours in terms of Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and dose metrics extracted from clinical plans. An independent dataset of 42 patients was used for subjective evaluation of the auto-segmentation model by 4 physicians., Results: The average DSCs were 0.95 (+/- 0.01) for the whole heart, 0.91 (+/- 0.02) for 4 chambers, 0.86 (+/- 0.09) for 6 great vessels, 0.81 (+/- 0.09) for 4 valves, and 0.60 (+/- 0.14) for 4 coronary arteries. The average absolute errors in mean/max doses to all substructures were 1.04 (+/- 1.99) Gy and 2.20 (+/- 4.37) Gy. The subjective evaluation revealed that 94% of the auto-segmented contours were clinically acceptable., Conclusion: We demonstrated the effectiveness of our nnU-Net model for delineating cardiac substructures, including coronary arteries. Our results indicate that this model has promise for studies regarding radiation dose to cardiac substructures., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a revolutionary paradigm in the treatment of thoracic malignancies and chemoimmunotherapy is a current standard care in this field. Chemotherapeutic agents are known to induce not only direct cytotoxic effects on tumor cells but also immune modulating effects, such as stimulating immunogenic cell death (ICD). Currently, either pemetrexed (PEM) or taxane plus platinum are combined with ICIs for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, it is still unknown whether these agents are immunologically optimal partners for ICIs., Methods: To determine the immunologically optimal chemotherapeutic agent, we first evaluated the ability of several chemotherapeutic agents, including platinum, PEM, taxane, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) to induce ICD using several thoracic tumor cell lines in vitro. ICD was evaluated by the cell surface expression of calreticulin (CRT) and adenosine-triphosphate (ATP) secretion. We further performed an antitumor vaccination assay in vivo., Results: 5-FU induced cell surface expression of CRT and ATP secretion most efficiently among the several chemotherapeutic agents. This effect was enhanced when it was combined with platinum. In the antitumor vaccination assay in vivo, we found that vaccination with dying-AB1-HA (a murine malignant mesothelioma cell line) cells treated with 5-FU, but neither PEM nor PTX, reduced the tumor growth of living-AB1-HA cells inoculated 1 week after vaccination by recruiting CD3 + CD8 + T cells into the tumor microenvironment., Conclusion: Our findings indicate that fluoropyrimidine can be an immunologically optimal partner of ICIs through the induction of ICD for thoracic malignancies., (© 2023 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) driver mutations are crucial for treatment decisions for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to assess the differences in EGFR mutation detection between two companion diagnostic (CDx) tests-the Oncomine Dx Target Test (ODxTT) and the AmoyDx Pan Lung Cancer PCR Panel-and their impact on treatment applicability. To this end, we used an in-house targeted sequencing dataset of 282 samples from 127 EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients to simulate the concordance between the EGFR variants targeted by the ODxTT and AmoyDx panel, the oncogenicity of the variants, and their therapeutic potential. Of the 216 EGFR mutations identified by the in-house panel, 51% were detectable by both CDx tests, 3% were specific to ODxTT, and 46% were not targeted by either test. Most non-targeted mutations did not have oncogenicity and were located outside exons 18-21. Notably, 95% of the mutations detectable by both tests had potential oncogenicity. Furthermore, among the 96 patients harboring actionable EGFR mutations, 97% had mutations detectable by both CDx tests and 1% by ODxTT, while 2% had mutations not covered by either test. These findings suggest that while both CDx tests are effective in detecting almost all actionable EGFR mutations, ODxTT provides slightly broader coverage. These results emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate CDx tests to inform treatment decisions for EGFR-positive NSCLC patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

A Japanese woman in her 60s developed a kidney injury 9 weeks after treatment with pemetrexed, carboplatin, and pembrolizumab for stage IV lung adenocarcinoma. A renal biopsy showed chronic tubulointerstitial damage with minimal focal interstitial inflammation, consistent with pemetrexed-induced nephropathy; thus, pemetrexed was withdrawn. However, the kidney injury continued to worsen. A repeated biopsy showed severe acute tubulointerstitial nephritis, suggestive of a pembrolizumab-induced immune-related adverse event (irAE). The worsening after pemetrexed discontinuation suggested that the irAE had already begun, as the first biopsy showed focal inflammation. This case suggests thatcombining immune checkpoints and chemotherapy requires considering concurrent drug-induced nephrotoxicity.

Background: NY-ESO-1 and XAGE1 cancer/testis antigens elicit humoral and cellular immune responses in NSCLC patients. We aimed to predict clinical benefit with ICI monotherapy, using an automated immunoassay of NY-ESO-1/XAGE1 antibodies (Abs)., Methods: This study enrolled 99 NSCLC patients who received nivolumab after chemotherapy, including 21 patients harboring EGFR, ALK, or KRAS alterations. The cutoff value (10 units/mL) of NY-ESO-1 and XAGE1 Ab was determined based on Ab levels in non-malignant controls, and NY-ESO-1/XAGE1 Abs in NSCLC were measured before nivolumab. Differences in PFS and OS between the Ab-positive and Ab-negative groups were retrospectively analyzed using Cox regression analysis after applying inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)., Results: NY-ESO-1/XAGE1 Abs were positive in 28 NSCLC, who responded more highly to nivolumab than the Ab-negatives (response rate 50.0% vs. 15.5 %, p < 0.0007). The IPTW-adjusted positives and negatives for NY-ESO-1/XAGE1 Abs were 24.5 and 70.2, respectively. The Ab-positives showed longer IPTW-adjusted PFS (HR = 0.59, 95 % CI: 0.39-0.90, p = 0.014) and IPTW-adjusted OS (HR = 0.51, 95 % CI: 0.32-0.81, p = 0.004) than the Ab-negatives. Among NSCLC harboring driver genes, the Ab-positives (n = 10) showed longer PFS (HR = 0.34, 95 % CI: 0.13-0.89, p = 0.029) and OS (HR = 0.27, 95 % CI: 0.098-0.75, p = 0.012) than the Ab-negatives (n = 11)., Conclusion: Our immunoassay of NY-ESO-1/XAGE1 Abs is probably useful for predicting the clinical benefit with nivolumab in NSCLC, including those harboring driver genes. These results suggest that our immunoassay may be useful in ICI monotherapy for NSCLC., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Kanako Sakaeda, Yasuhiro Irino, and Masatoshi Yanagida received personal fees for salary as full-time employees and stock ownership from Sysmex corporation. Satoshi Muto had grants or contracts from JSPS KAKENHI; received payment or honoraria for lectures or manuscript writing from MSD, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly Japan, Bristol Myers Squibb, Tahiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical and “Gan to Kagakuryoho”. Takeshi Masuda received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Daiichi-Sankyo, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono Pharmaceutical, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Kirin, Eli Lilly Japan and Chugai Pharmaceutical. Yumiko Sakai and Yusuke Atarashi received personal fees for salary as full-time employees. Noboru Hattori received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb and MSD. Mikio Oka and Koji Kurose received JSPS KAKENHI Grant, Collaborative Research Fund from Sysmex Corporation and Endowment from Pole Star. The other authors have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, clinical trials often exclude those with a history of autoimmune diseases (ADs) because of concerns regarding immune-related adverse events. Therefore, the efficacy of ICIs in advanced NSCLC patients with ADs should be evaluated. This study used administrative claims data from advanced treatment centers in Japan and identified patients with advanced NSCLC who began chemotherapy between December 2016 and January 2023. The patients were divided into four groups based on the presence of ADs and types of chemotherapy received. The association between ICI therapy and overall survival in the subgroups with or without ADs, and the association between the presence of AD and overall survival in patients who received ICI therapy and conventional chemotherapy, were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard regression, including therapy and presence of ADs and their interaction as covariates. These results were obtained using the inverse probability of treatment weighting. ICI therapy had a hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for death in the subgroup of AD and non-AD patients of 0.88 (0.84-0.92) and 0.83 (0.71-0.97), respectively (p = 0.459 for interaction). For some specific ADs, including type 1 diabetes mellitus, the association between ICI therapy and decreased mortality was not observed. In conclusion, our study showed comparable associations between ICI therapy and reduced mortality in AD and non-AD subgroups of patients with advanced NSCLC. However, therapy strategies tailored to each AD type and thorough discussions regarding the risk-benefit profile are crucial.

Glyoxalase I (GLO I), a major enzyme involved in the detoxification of the anaerobic glycolytic byproduct methylglyoxal, is highly expressed in various tumors, and is regarded as a promising target for cancer therapy. We recently reported that piceatannol potently inhibits human GLO I and induces the death of GLO I-dependent cancer cells. Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) is also a potential therapeutic target for cancer treatment, so we evaluated the combined anticancer efficacy of piceatannol plus low-dose shikonin, a potent and specific plant-derived PKM2 inhibitor, in two GLO I-dependent cancer cell lines, HL-60 human myeloid leukemia cells and NCI-H522 human non-small-cell lung cancer cells. Combined treatment with piceatannol and low-dose shikonin for 48 h synergistically reduced cell viability, enhanced apoptosis rate, and increased extracellular methylglyoxal accumulation compared to single-agent treatment, but did not alter PKM1, PKM2, or GLO I protein expression. Taken together, these results indicate that concomitant use of low-dose shikonin potentiates piceatannol-induced apoptosis of GLO I-dependent cancer cells by augmenting methylglyoxal accumulation., (© 2023 The Authors. Genes to Cells published by Molecular Biology Society of Japan and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Introduction: Pembrolizumab (Pemb) therapy in conjunction with carboplatin and paclitaxel (PTX)/nab-PTX has been efficacious in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the response predictors of this combination therapy (Pemb-combination) remain undetermined. We aimed to evaluate whether Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), body mass index (BMI), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) are potential factors in prognosticating the response to Pemb-combination therapy in advanced NSCLC patients., Methods: We retrospectively recruited 144 NSCLC patients receiving first-line treatment with Pemb-combination therapy from 13 institutions between December 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020. GPS, NLR, BMI, PLR, and PNI were assessed for their efficacy as prognostic indicators. Cox proportional hazard models and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to compare the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the patients., Results: The treatment exhibited a response rate of 63.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 55.0-70.6%). Following Pemb-combination administration, the median PFS and OS were 7.3 (95% CI: 5.3-9.4) and 16.5 (95% CI: 13.9-22.1) months, respectively. Contrary to PNI, NLR, GPS, BMI, and PLR did not display substantially different PFS in univariate analysis. However, multivariate analysis did not identify PNI as an independent prognostic factor for PFS. Furthermore, univariate analysis revealed that GPS, BMI, and PLR exhibited similar values for OS but not NLR and PNI. Patients with PNI ≥45 were predicted to have better OS than those with PNI &lt;45 (OS: 23.4 and 13.9 months, respectively, p = 0.0028). Multivariate analysis did not establish NLR as an independent prognostic factor for OS., Conclusion: The PNI evidently predicted OS in NSCLC patients treated with Pemb-combination as first-line therapy, thereby validating its efficiency as a prognostic indicator of NSCLC., (© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Purpose: Latent lymph node metastasis is a clinical concern in the surgical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The present study identified a simple tool, including the volume-doubling time (VDT), for evaluating the risk of nodal metastasis., Methods: We reviewed, retrospectively, 560 patients who underwent radical resection for cN0M0 NSCLC. The whole tumor VDT and solid component VDT (SVDT) for differentiating the histological type and adenocarcinoma subtype were analyzed and a nomogram was constructed using variables selected through a stepwise selection method. The model was assessed through a calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA)., Results: Lymph node metastases were detected in 89 patients (15.9%). The SVDT tended to be longer in patients with adenocarcinoma (294.5 days, p < 0.0001) than in those with other histological types of NSCLC, but was shorter when the solid/micropapillary component was predominant (127.0 days, p < 0.0001). The selected variables (tumor location, solid component diameter, consolidation tumor ratio, SVDT, and carcinoembryonic antigen) demonstrated significant differences and were used for the nomogram. The calibration curve indicated consistency, and the DCA showed validity across most threshold ranges from 0 to 68%., Conclusions: The established nomogram is a useful tool for the preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis, and the SVDT was the most influential factor in the nomogram., (© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.)

Although tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy shows marked clinical efficacy in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) and ROS proto-oncogene 1-positive (ROS1+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), most of these patients eventually relapse with acquired resistance. Therefore, genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screening was performed using an ALK+ NSCLC cell line established from pleural effusion without ALK-TKI treatment. After 9 days of ALK-TKI therapy, sequencing analysis was performed, which identified several tumor suppressor genes, such as NF2 or MED12, and multiple candidate genes. Among them, this study focused on ERRFI1, which is known as MIG6 and negatively regulates EGFR signaling. Interestingly, MIG6 loss induced resistance to ALK-TKIs by treatment with quite a low dose of EGF, which is equivalent to plasma concentration, through the upregulation of MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways. Combination therapy with ALK-TKIs and anti-EGFR antibodies could overcome the acquired resistance in both in vivo and in vitro models. In addition, this verified that MIG6 loss induces resistance to ROS1-TKIs in ROS1+ cell lines. This study found a potentially novel factor that plays a role in ALK and ROS1-TKI resistance by activating the EGFR pathway with low-dose ligands.

Aims: Long-term administration of pemetrexed (PEM) in patients with lung cancer can cause renal damage, leading to treatment discontinuation. Previous reports have suggested that specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the folylpolyglutamate synthase (FPGS) gene affect therapeutic efficacy; however, whether the FPGS SNPs affect renal function is unclear. Identifying SNPs related to renal damage during PEM administration may help predict the decrease in renal function caused by PEM., Methods: We retrospectively examined age, sex, body weight, total administered PEM, combined platinum, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine (SCr) levels before and after PEM administration in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and searched for the alleles of FPGS SNPs (rs1544105 and rs10106) using DNA extracted from whole blood samples of patients., Results: Renal function decreased after PEM administration in 26 cases overall. The SCr and eGFR indices showed decreased renal function irrespective of concomitant cisplatin use. Based on promoter activity and miRNA binding predictions, rs1544105-C and rs10106-T were hypothesized to increase FPGS expression. Single SNP analyses showed no significant differences in renal function between groups with and without each SNP. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the most significant factors for decreased renal function were sex on SCr and the number of SNPs on eGFR. In subgroup analyses, the patients with rs10106-T showed a decline in renal function in the older group., Conclusions: The number of FPGS SNPs may contribute to PEM-induced renal impairment. Detecting FPGS SNPs may help predict PEM-induced renal damage., (© 2023 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Objectives: Osimertinib is the primary treatment for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer. However, evidence of the outcomes of osimertinib treatment in patients over 75 years of age in the real-world setting is limited., Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the data of 538 patients (203 elderly and 335 non-elderly) with EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer in whom osimertinib was initiated as first-line treatment between August 2018 and December 2019. Patients over 75 years of age were classified as elderly. The data cut-off date was February 28, 2022., Results: The progression-free survival (PFS) did not significantly differ between the elderly and non-elderly groups [elderly group: median PFS, 16.9 months (95 % confidence interval (CI), 14.3-20.2); non-elderly group: median PFS, 22.1 months (95 % CI: 19.5-26.3); hazard ratio (HR) for the elderly against the non-elderly: 1.21 (95 % CI: 0.98-1.50), p = 0.079]. However, the time to treatment failure (TTF) was significantly shorter in the elderly than in the non-elderly [elderly group: median TTF, 14.0 months (95 % CI: 0.98-1.50); non-elderly group: median TTF, 21.8 months (95 % CI: 18.2-24.6); HR for the elderly against the non-elderly: 1.46 (95 % CI: 1.20-1.77), p < 0.001]. Furthermore, the rate of treatment discontinuation because of adverse events was 28.6 % in the elderly and 14.9 % in the non-elderly (p < 0.001). Among patients who discontinued treatment, the conversion rate to second-line treatment was 39.6 % in the elderly and 72.8 % in the non-elderly. In addition, the median overall survival was 30 months (95 % CI: 25.8-37.7) in the elderly and not reached (NR) (95 % CI: NR-NR) in the non-elderly (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: In a real-world clinical setting, elderly patients receiving osimertinib as first-line treatment should be aware of the frequent inability to transition to second-line treatment due to adverse events., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr. Yoshihiko Sakata reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Kyowa KIRIN, MSD, Novartis Pharma KK, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited outside the submitted work. Dr. Saito reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo Company, MSD, Novartis Pharma KK, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, and Taiho Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. Dr. Shinya Sakata reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited outside the submitted work. Dr. Oya reported receiving personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis Pharma KK, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited outside the submitted work. Dr. Tamiya reported receiving personal fees from Amgen, Asahi Kasei Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, and Taiho Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. Dr. Suzuki reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited outside the submitted work. Dr. Shibaki declares that he has no competing financial interests or personal relationships that would affect the research reported in this paper. Dr. Okada reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Kyowa KIRIN, MSD, and Nippon Kayaku Co. Ltd. outside the submitted work. Dr. Yokoyama reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Merck Biopharma Co. Ltd., MSD, Nippon Kayaku Co. Ltd., Novartis Pharma KK, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited outside the submitted work. Dr. Matsumoto reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD, Nippon Kayaku Co. Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited outside the submitted work. Dr. Otsuki reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai Co. Ltd., MSD, Nippon Kayaku Co. Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical, and Tsumura & Co. outside the submitted work. Dr. Sato reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis Pharma KK, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Nippon Kayaku, Kyowa Kirin, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited outside the submitted work. Dr. Uchida reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Kyowa KIRIN, MSD, Novartis Pharma KK, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited outside the submitted work. Dr. Tsukita reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, MSD, and Taiho Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. Dr. Inaba reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited outside the submitted work. Dr.Ikeda declares that he has no competing financial interests or personal relationships that would affect the research reported in this paper. Dr. Arai reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Merck Biopharma Co. Ltd., MSD, Nippon Kayaku Co. Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited outside the submitted work. Dr. Maruyama reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, and Taiho Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. Dr. Hara declares that he has no competing financial interests or personal relationships that would affect the research reported in this paper. Dr. Tsumura declares that he has no competing financial interests or personal relationships that would affect the research reported in this paper. Dr. Morinaga declares that he has no competing financial interests or personal relationships that would affect the research reported in this paper. Dr. Sakagami reported receiving personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Novartis Pharma KK, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, and Sanofi outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Biomarker testing for driver mutations is essential for selecting appropriate non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment but is insufficient., Objective: To investigate the status of biomarker testing and drug therapy for NSCLC in Japan for identifying problems in treatment., Design, Setting, and Participants: The REVEAL cohort study included retrospective data collection and prospective follow-up from 29 institutions across Japan. Of 1500 patients diagnosed with advanced or recurrent NSCLC between January 1 and March 18, 2021, 1479 were eligible. Cases recognized at the wrong clinical stage (n = 12), diagnosed outside the study period (n = 6), not treated according to eligibility criteria before recurrence (n = 2), and with deficient consent acquisition procedure (n = 1) were excluded., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the biomarker testing status. Treatment-related factors were examined., Results: Among the 1479 patients included in the analysis, the median age was 72 (range, 30-95) years; 1013 (68.5%) were men; 1161 (78.5%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1; 1097 (74.2%) were current or past smokers; and 947 (64.0%) had adenocarcinoma. Biomarker status was confirmed in 1273 patients (86.1%). Multigene testing was performed in 705 cases (47.7%); single-gene testing, in 847 (57.3%); and both, in 279 (18.9%). Biomarker testing was performed for EGFR in 1245 cases (84.2%); ALK, in 1165 (78.8%); ROS1, in 1077 (72.8%); BRAF, in 803 (54.3%); and MET, in 805 (54.4%). Positivity rates among 898 adenocarcinoma cases included 305 (34.0%) for EGFR, 29 (3.2%) for ALK, 19 (2.1%) for ROS1, 11 (1.2%) for BRAF, and 14 (1.6%) for MET. Positivity rates among 375 nonadenocarcinoma cases were 14 (3.7%) for EGFR, 6 (1.6%) for ALK, 1 (0.3%) for ROS1, 3 (0.8%) for BRAF, and 8 (2.1%) for MET. Poor physical status, squamous cell carcinoma, and other comorbidities were associated with hampered multigene testing. Targeted therapy was received as first-line treatment by 263 of 278 cases (94.6%) positive for EGFR, 25 of 32 (78.1%) positive for ALK, 15 of 24 (62.5%) positive for ROS1, 9 of 12 (75.0%) positive for BRAF, and 12 of 19 (63.2%) positive for MET. Median overall survival of patients with positive findings for driver gene alteration and who received targeted therapy was 24.3 (95% CI, not reported) months; with positive findings for driver gene alteration and who did not receive targeted therapy, 15.2 (95% CI, 7.7 to not reported) months; and with negative findings for driver gene alteration, 11.0 (95% CI, 10.0-12.5) months. Multigene testing for nonadenocarcinomas and adenocarcinomas accounted for 705 (47.7%) of all NSCLC cases., Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that multigene testing has not been sufficiently implemented in Japan and should be considered prospectively, even in nonadenocarcinomas, to avoid missing rare driver gene alterations.

Small amounts of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation (micro-T790M), which is detected using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) but not conventional PCR, in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples have been investigated as a predictive factor for the efficacy of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, the predictive value of micro-T790M remains controversial, possibly owing to the failure to examine artificial T790M in FFPE specimens. Therefore, we examined the predictive value of micro-T790M in first-generation (1G), second-generation (2G), and third-generation (3G) EGFR-TKI efficacy using a new method to exclude FFPE-derived artificial mutations in our retrospective cohort. The primary objective was time to treatment failure (TTF) of 1G, 2G, and 3G EGFR-TKIs according to micro-T790M status. In total, 315 patients with EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer treated with 1G, 2G, and 3G EGFR-TKIs were included in this study. The proportion of patients positive for micro-T790M in the 1G, 2G, and 3G EGFR-TKI groups was 48.2%, 47.1%, and 47.6%, respectively. In the micro-T790M-positive group, the TTF was significantly longer in the 2G and 3G EGFR-TKI groups than in the 1G TKI group. No differences in the micro-T790M-negative group were observed. Micro-T790M status detected using ddPCR, eliminating false positives, may be a valuable predictor of EGFR-TKI efficacy., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Recent studies have shown that D-allose, a rare sugar, elicits antitumor effects on different types of solid cancers, such as hepatocellular carcinoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. In this study, we examined the effects of D-allose on the proliferation of human glioblastoma (GBM) cell lines (i.e., U251MG and U87MG) in vitro and in vivo and the underlying mechanisms. D-allose treatment inhibited the proliferation of U251MG and U87MG cells in a dose-dependent manner (3-50 mM). However, D-allose treatment did not affect cell cycles or apoptosis in these cells but significantly decreased the cell division frequency in both GBM cell lines. In a subcutaneous U87MG cell xenograft model, intraperitoneal injection of D-allose (100 mg/kg/day) significantly reduced the tumor volume in 28 days. These data indicate that D-allose-induced reduction in cell proliferation is associated with a subsequent decrease in the number of cell divisions, independent of cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Thus, D-allose could be an attractive additive to therapeutic strategies for GBM., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy and ICI plus chemotherapy are approved first-line treatments for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) expressing high levels of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). However, appropriate treatment for patients showing high PD-L1 expression and poor performance status (PS) is not well defined., Objective: The aim of this study was to identify a treatment option that is better for these patients in a real-world setting., Patients and Methods: A total of 425 patients with NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression were included retrospectively. All patients received either pembrolizumab monotherapy or ICI plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment. Patients were subdivided into good (PS score 0 or 1; n = 354) and poor PS groups (PS score 2 or 3; n = 71). Early progressive disease (PD) was defined as PD within 3 months of ICI-based therapy initiation., Results: The good PS group had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than the poor PS group upon ICI-based therapy administration. In the poor PS group, no significant difference was observed in PFS and OS between pembrolizumab monotherapy and ICI plus chemotherapy. In the good PS group, pembrolizumab monotherapy, PD-L1 50-89%, and liver metastasis were associated with early PD, as determined using multivariate logistic regression analyses. However, in the poor PS group, the multivariate logistic regression analyses did not show an association between pembrolizumab monotherapy and early PD., Conclusions: In patients with NSCLC exhibiting poor PS and high PD-L1 expression, ICI plus chemotherapy did not confer PFS or OS benefit compared with pembrolizumab monotherapy., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress has a close relation with cancer progression. Blocking the adaptive pathway of ER stress could be an anticancer strategy. Here, we identified an ER stress-related gene, Transducin beta-like 2 (TBL2), an ER-localized type I transmembrane protein, on increased chromosome 7q as a candidate driver gene of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD)., Methods: The association between TBL2 mRNA expression and prognostic outcomes and clinicopathological factors was analyzed using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets of LUAD and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). Localization of TBL2 in tumor tissues was observed by immunohistochemical staining. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was conducted using TCGA dataset. In vitro cell proliferation assays were performed using TBL2 knockdown LUAD cells, LUSC cells, and LUAD cells overexpressing TBL2. Apoptosis and ATF4 expression (ER stress marker) were evaluated by western blotting., Results: TBL2 was overexpressed in LUAD and LUSC cells. Multivariate analysis indicated high TBL2 mRNA expression was an independent poor prognostic factor of LUAD. GSEA revealed high TBL2 expression was positively correlated to the ER stress response in LUAD. TBL2 knockdown attenuated LUAD cell proliferation under ER stress. TBL2 inhibited apoptosis in LUAD cells under ER stress. TBL2 knockdown reduced ATF4 expression under ER stress., Conclusions: TBL2 may be a novel driver gene that facilitates cell proliferation, possibly by upregulating ATF4 expression followed by adaptation to ER stress, and it is a poor prognostic biomarker of LUAD., (© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Importance: Administration of durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment of unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, 20% to 30% of patients do not receive durvalumab because of adverse events (AEs) during concurrent chemoradiotherapy. In addition, radiotherapy and immunotherapy have a synergistic effect., Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of durvalumab immunotherapy plus concurrent radiotherapy followed by maintenance with durvalumab therapy for treatment of locally advanced NSCLC without chemotherapy., Design, Setting, and Participants: The multicenter, single-arm DOLPHIN (Phase II Study of Durvalumab [MEDI4736] Plus Concurrent Radiation Therapy in Advanced Localized NSCLC Patients) nonrandomized controlled trial was performed by 12 institutions in Japan from September 13, 2019, to May 31, 2022. Participants in the primary registration phase included 74 patients with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive, unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC. The current analyses were conducted from June 1, 2022, to October 31, 2022., Interventions: Patients received radiotherapy (60 Gy) in combination with concurrent and maintenance durvalumab immunotherapy, 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, for up to 1 year., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point of the rate of 12-month progression-free survival (PFS), as assessed by an independent central review, was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and evaluated with 90% CIs calculated using the Greenwood formula. The key secondary end points were PFS, objective response rate, treatment completion rate, and AEs., Results: Data from 35 patients (median [range] age, 72 [44-83] years; 31 [88.6%] men) were included in the full analysis set of the evaluable population. The 12-month PFS rate was 72.1% (90% CI, 59.1%-85.1%), and the median PFS was 25.6 months (95% CI, 13.1 months to not estimable) at a median follow-up of 22.8 months (range, 4.3-31.8 months). Scheduled radiation therapy was completed in 97.1% of patients. The confirmed objective response rate was 90.9% (95% CI, 75.7%-98.1%), and the treatment completion rate was 57.6% (95% CI, 39.2%-74.5%). Among 34 patients evaluated in the safety analysis set, AEs of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 18 patients (52.9%), and of grade 5 in 2 patients (5.9%). Pneumonitis or radiation pneumonitis of any grade occurred in 23 patients (67.6%), and of grades 3 or 4 in 4 patients (11.8%)., Conclusions and Relevance: Findings from this phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial indicate that durvalumab immunotherapy combined with curative radiotherapy for patients with PD-L1-positive, unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC is a promising treatment with tolerable AEs and is appropriate as a study treatment for phase 3 clinical trials., Trial Registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials ID: jRCT2080224763.

Introduction: The PACIFIC regimen of consolidation therapy with the programmed cell death-ligand 1 inhibitor durvalumab after definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy has become a standard of care for individuals with unresectable stage III NSCLC. Nevertheless, approximately half of the treated patients experience disease progression within 1 year, with the mechanisms of treatment resistance being poorly understood. We here performed a nationwide prospective biomarker study to explore the resistance mechanisms (WJOG11518L:SUBMARINE)., Methods: A total of 135 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who received the PACIFIC regimen were included for comprehensive profiling of the tumor microenvironment by immunohistochemistry, transcriptome analysis, and genomic sequencing of pretreatment tumor tissue and flow cytometric analysis of circulating immune cells. Progression-free survival was compared on the basis of these biomarkers., Results: The importance of preexisting effective adaptive immunity in tumors was revealed for treatment benefit regardless of genomic features. We also identified CD73 expression by cancer cells as a mechanism of resistance to the PACIFIC regimen. Multivariable analysis of immunohistochemistry data with key clinical factors as covariables indicated that low CD8 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density and the high CD73 + cancer cells were independently associated with poor durvalumab outcome (hazard ratios = 4.05 [95% confidence interval: 1.17-14.04] for CD8 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; 4.79 [95% confidence interval: 1.12-20.58] for CD73). In addition, whole-exome sequencing of paired tumor samples suggested that cancer cells eventually escaped immune pressure as a result of neoantigen plasticity., Conclusions: Our study emphasizes the importance of functional adaptive immunity in stage III NSCLC and implicates CD73 as a promising treatment target, thus providing insight forming a basis for development of a new treatment approach in NSCLC., (Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Risk factors for predicting pneumonitis during durvalumab consolidation after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) are still lacking. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) play a crucial role in intercellular communication and are potential diagnostic tools for various diseases., Methods: We retrospectively collected predurvalumab treatment serum samples from patients treated with durvalumab for LA-NSCLC, isolated EVs using anti-CD9 and anti-CD63 antibodies, and performed proteomic analyses. We examined EV proteins that could predict the development of symptomatic pneumonitis (SP) during durvalumab treatment. Potential EV-protein biomarkers were validated in an independent cohort., Results: In the discovery cohort, 73 patients were included, 49 with asymptomatic pneumonitis (AP) and 24 with SP. Of the 5797 proteins detected in circulating EVs, 33 were significantly elevated (fold change [FC] > 1.5, p < 0.05) in the SP group, indicating enrichment of the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathway. Patients with high levels of EV-RELA, an NF-κB subunit, had a higher incidence of SP than those with low levels of EV-RELA (53.8% vs. 13.4%, p = 0.0017). In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, EV-RELA demonstrated a higher area under the curve (AUC) than lung V20 (0.76 vs. 0.62) and was identified as an independent risk factor in the multivariate logistic regression analysis (p = 0.008, odds ratio 7.72). Moreover, high EV-RELA was also a predictor of SP in the validation cohort comprising 43 patients (AUC of 0.80)., Conclusions: Circulating EV-RELA may be a predictive marker for symptomatic pneumonitis in patients with LA-NSCLC treated with durvalumab., (© 2023 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: In CheckMate 227 Part 1 (NCT02477826), first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated long-term durable overall survival (OS) benefit versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), regardless of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. We report results in Japanese patients with ≥ 5-year follow-up., Methods: Adults with stage IV/recurrent NSCLC without EGFR/ALK aberrations were randomized 1:1:1 to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab alone, or chemotherapy (patients with tumor PD-L1 ≥ 1%), or nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy (patients with tumor PD-L1 < 1%). Five-year efficacy and safety were assessed in Japanese patients., Results: At 62.1 months' minimum follow-up, 143 Japanese patients with PD-L1 ≥ 1% or < 1% were randomized to nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n = 66) or chemotherapy (n = 77). Five-year OS rates were 46% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus 34% with chemotherapy (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 36% versus 19% (PD-L1 < 1%). Median duration of response was 59.1 versus 7.1 months (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 17.3 versus 3.0 months (PD-L1 < 1%). Among 5-year survivors treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (PD-L1 ≥ 1% and < 1%; n = 27), 59% (95% CI, 39%-75%) were off treatment for ≥ 3 years without receiving subsequent therapy. No new safety signals were observed., Conclusions: At 5-year follow-up, nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to show long-term durable clinical benefit versus chemotherapy, regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression. Consistent with findings for the global population, these data support the use of nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line treatment in Japanese patients with metastatic NSCLC., (© 2023. The Author(s).)