Automated immunoassay of serum NY-ESO-1 and XAGE1 antibodies for predicting clinical benefit with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: NY-ESO-1 and XAGE1 cancer/testis antigens elicit humoral and cellular immune responses in NSCLC patients. We aimed to predict clinical benefit with ICI monotherapy, using an automated immunoassay of NY-ESO-1/XAGE1 antibodies (Abs).
Methods: This study enrolled 99 NSCLC patients who received nivolumab after chemotherapy, including 21 patients harboring EGFR, ALK, or KRAS alterations. The cutoff value (10 units/mL) of NY-ESO-1 and XAGE1 Ab was determined based on Ab levels in non-malignant controls, and NY-ESO-1/XAGE1 Abs in NSCLC were measured before nivolumab. Differences in PFS and OS between the Ab-positive and Ab-negative groups were retrospectively analyzed using Cox regression analysis after applying inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).
Results: NY-ESO-1/XAGE1 Abs were positive in 28 NSCLC, who responded more highly to nivolumab than the Ab-negatives (response rate 50.0% vs. 15.5 %, p < 0.0007). The IPTW-adjusted positives and negatives for NY-ESO-1/XAGE1 Abs were 24.5 and 70.2, respectively. The Ab-positives showed longer IPTW-adjusted PFS (HR = 0.59, 95 % CI: 0.39-0.90, p = 0.014) and IPTW-adjusted OS (HR = 0.51, 95 % CI: 0.32-0.81, p = 0.004) than the Ab-negatives. Among NSCLC harboring driver genes, the Ab-positives (n = 10) showed longer PFS (HR = 0.34, 95 % CI: 0.13-0.89, p = 0.029) and OS (HR = 0.27, 95 % CI: 0.098-0.75, p = 0.012) than the Ab-negatives (n = 11).
Conclusion: Our immunoassay of NY-ESO-1/XAGE1 Abs is probably useful for predicting the clinical benefit with nivolumab in NSCLC, including those harboring driver genes. These results suggest that our immunoassay may be useful in ICI monotherapy for NSCLC.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Kanako Sakaeda, Yasuhiro Irino, and Masatoshi Yanagida received personal fees for salary as full-time employees and stock ownership from Sysmex corporation. Satoshi Muto had grants or contracts from JSPS KAKENHI; received payment or honoraria for lectures or manuscript writing from MSD, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly Japan, Bristol Myers Squibb, Tahiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical and “Gan to Kagakuryoho”. Takeshi Masuda received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Daiichi-Sankyo, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono Pharmaceutical, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Kirin, Eli Lilly Japan and Chugai Pharmaceutical. Yumiko Sakai and Yusuke Atarashi received personal fees for salary as full-time employees. Noboru Hattori received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb and MSD. Mikio Oka and Koji Kurose received JSPS KAKENHI Grant, Collaborative Research Fund from Sysmex Corporation and Endowment from Pole Star. The other authors have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)