Search

Current systemic therapy guidelines for patients with HER2 + breast cancer brain metastases (BCBrM) diverge based on the status of extracranial disease (ECD). An in-depth understanding of the impact of ECD on outcomes in HER2 + BCBrM has never been performed. Our study explores the implications of ECD status on intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and overall survival (OS) after first incidence of HER2 + BCBrM and radiation.A retrospective analysis was performed of 151 patients diagnosed with initial HER2 + BCBrM who received radiation therapy to the central nervous system (CNS) at Duke between 2008 and 2021. The primary endpoint was iPFS defined as the time from first CNS radiation treatment to intracranial progression or death. OS was defined as the time from first CNS radiation or first metastatic disease to death. Systemic staging scans within 30 days of initial BCBrM defined ECD status as progressive, stable/responding or none (isolated brain relapse).In this cohort, 70% of patients had controlled ECD with either isolated brain relapse (27%) or stable/responding ECD (44%). OS from initial metastatic disease to death was markedly worse for patients with isolated intracranial relapse (median = 28.4 m) compared to those with progressive or stable/responding ECD (48.8 m and 71.5 m, respectively, p = 0.0028). OS from first CNS radiation to death was significantly worse for patients with progressive ECD (16.9 m) versus stable/responding (36.6 m) or isolated intracranial relapse (28.4 m, p = 0.007). iPFS did not differ statistically based on ECD status. Receipt of systemic therapy after first BCBrM significantly improved iPFS (HR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.25-0.81, p = 0.008) and OS (HR: 0.43 (95% CI: 0.23-0.81); p = 0.001).OS in patients with HER2 + isolated BCBrM was inferior to those with concurrent progressive or stable/responding ECD. Studies investigating initiation of brain-penetrable HER2-targeted therapies earlier in the disease course of isolated HER2 + intracranial relapse patients are warranted.

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers that predict which patients with early stage NSCLC will develop recurrent disease would be of clinical value. We previously discovered that an autoantibody to a complement regulatory protein, complement factor H (CFH), is associated with early stage, non-recurrent NSCLC, and hypothesized that the anti-CFH antibody inhibits metastasis. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the anti-CFH antibody as a prognostic marker for recurrence in stage I NSCLC. A secondary objective was to determine if changes in antibody serum level one year after resection were associated with recurrence. METHODS: Anti-CFH antibody was measured in the sera of 157 stage I NSCLC patients designated as a prognostic cohort: 61% whose cancers did not recur, and 39% whose cancers recurred following resection. Impact of anti-CFH antibody positivity on time to recurrence was assessed using a competing risk analysis. Anti-CFH antibody levels were measured before resection and one year after resection in an independent temporal cohort of 47 antibody-positive stage I NSCLC patients: 60% whose cancers did not recur and 40% whose cancers recurred following resection. The non-recurrent and recurrent groups were compared with respect to the one-year percent change in antibody level. RESULTS: In the prognostic cohort, the 60-month cumulative incidence of recurrence was 40% and 22% among antibody negative and positive patients, respectively; this difference was significant (Gray’s test, P= 0.0425). In the temporal cohort, the antibody persisted in the serum at one year post-tumor resection. The change in antibody levels over the one year period was not statistically different between the non-recurrent and recurrent groups (Wilcoxon two-sample test, P= 0.4670). CONCLUSIONS: The anti-CFH autoantibody may be a useful prognostic marker signifying non-recurrence in early stage NSCLC patients. However, change in the level of this antibody in antibody-positive patients one year after resection had no association with recurrence.

BACKGROUND COVID-19 radically changed neuro-oncology care. In this retrospective study, we examine the impact of COVID-19 infection on neuro-oncological care and clinical outcomes in two geographically separate populations. METHODS Descriptive statistics compared demographic and clinical history extracted from the medical records of COVID-19 positive patients with primary brain tumors treated between 3/1/2020 and 3/31/2021. All subjects were unvaccinated given our cohort pre-dates the ubiquitous availability of vaccines. Patients were treated at Washington University (WashU) in St. Louis, MO and Duke University in Durham, NC. Each site’s respective institutional review board approved the study, with a data transfer agreement in place. RESULTS We identified 62 total (WashU=13; Duke=49) subjects with positive COVID-19 infection. Patients were predominantly white (85.5%), male (56.5%), with KPS >=70 (82.3%) and never smoked (69.4%). WashU patients tended to be older with grade 4 tumors, but this was not significant. At the time of COVID infection 35.5% of patients were receiving cancer-directed therapy. Notably, 37.1% experienced delayed care due to a COVID-19 diagnosis, most often for scheduled systemic treatment or radiation treatment. A further 37.1% had an ER visit, hospitalization, or ICU stay attributed to COVID-19. Of the 17 patients who died during the study period, 4 deaths were attributed directly to COVID-19 and not to their underlying brain tumor or other cause. Finally, telehealth use differed between sites (84.6% at WashU vs 14.3% at Duke). However, this difference could not be attributed to patient age, performance status, or distance from treating institution. CONCLUSION COVID-19 infection led to treatment delays and death for a subset, but not the majority of neuro-oncology patients. Telehealth use varied between sites and was not associated with commonly held assumptions about patient distance or performance status, suggesting evolving practice norms following telehealth’s introduction. Study limitations include a small sample size

BackgroundThere is a concern that HER2-directed systemic therapies, when administered concurrently with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), may increase the risk of radiation necrosis (RN). This study explores the impact of timing and type of systemic therapies on the development of RN in patients treated with SRS for HER2+ breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBrM).MethodsThis was a single-institution, retrospective study including patients >18 years of age with HER2+ BCBrM who received SRS between 2013 and 2018 and with at least 12-month post-SRS follow-up. Presence of RN was determined via imaging at one-year post-SRS, with confirmation by biopsy in some patients. Demographics, radiotherapy parameters, and timing (“during” defined as four weeks pre- to four weeks post-SRS) and type of systemic therapy (e.g., chemotherapy, HER2-directed) were evaluated.ResultsAmong 46 patients with HER2+ BCBrM who received SRS, 28 (60.9%) developed RN and 18 (39.1%) did not based on imaging criteria. Of the 11 patients who underwent biopsy, 10/10 (100%) who were diagnosed with RN on imaging were confirmed to be RN positive on biopsy and 1/1 (100%) who was not diagnosed with RN was confirmed to be RN negative on biopsy. Age (mean 53.3 vs 50.4 years, respectively), radiotherapy parameters (including total dose, fractionation, CTV and size target volume, all p>0.05), and receipt of any type of systemic therapy during SRS (60.7% vs 55.6%, p=0.97) did not differ between patients who did or did not develop RN. However, there was a trend for patients who developed RN to have received more than one agent of HER2-directed therapy independent of SRS timing compared to those who did not develop RN (75.0% vs 44.4%, p=0.08). Moreover, a significantly higher proportion of those who developed RN received more than one agent of HER2-directed therapy during SRS treatment compared to those who did not develop RN (35.7% vs 5.6%, p=0.047).ConclusionsPatients with HER2 BCBrM who receive multiple HER2-directed therapies during SRS for BCBrM may be at higher risk of RN. Collectively, these data suggest that, in the eight-week window around SRS administration, if HER2-directed therapy is medically necessary, it is preferable that patients receive a single agent.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a subtype of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma that involves the brain, spinal cord, or leptomeninges, without evidence of systemic disease. This rare disease accounts for ~ 3% of all primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Methotrexate-based regimens are the standard of care for this disease with overall survival rates ranging from 14 to 55 months. Relapse after apparent complete remission can occur. We sought to understand the outcomes of patients who relapsed. This is an IRB-approved investigation of patients treated at our institution between 12/31/2004 and 10/12/2016. We retrospectively identified all cases of PCNSL as part of a database registry and evaluated these cases for demographic information, absence or presence of relapse, location of relapse, treatment regimens, and median relapse-free survival. This analysis identified 44 patients with a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of PCNSL. Mean age at diagnosis was 63.1 years (range 20–86, SD = 13.2 years). Of the 44 patients, 28 patients successfully completed an initial treatment regimen without recurrence or toxicity that required a change in therapy. Relapse occurred in 11 patients with the location of relapse being in the CNS only (n = 5), vitreous fluid only (n = 1), outside CNS only (n = 3), or a combination of CNS and outside of the CNS (n = 2). Sites of relapse outside of the CNS included testes (n = 1), lung (n = 1), adrenal gland (n = 1), kidney/adrenal gland (n = 1), and retroperitoneum (n = 1). Median relapse-free survival after successful completion of therapy was 6.7 years (95% CI 1.1, 12.6). After successful initial treatment, PCNSL has a propensity to relapse, and this relapse can occur both inside and outside of the CNS. Vigilant monitoring of off-treatment patients with a history of PCNSL is necessary to guide early diagnosis of relapse and to initiate aggressive treatment.

BACKGROUND D2C7-IT, a novel immunotoxin-based cytotoxic therapy, targets epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and mutant EGFR variant III. In preclinical studies, D2C7-IT kills tumor cells and prolongs survival, but is unable to generate cures in all animals. We hypothesized that immunosuppression in glioblastoma limits D2C7-IT efficacy. Eliminating glioblastoma immunosuppression via CD40 co-stimulation is anticipated to enhance D2C7-IT-induced antitumor responses. In murine glioma models, CED of D2C7-IT+αCD40 generated cures and long-term tumor-specific adaptive immunity. Hence, we are conducting a phase 1 trial of D2C7-IT+2141-V11 (αhuman-CD40) administered via CED in rMG patients. METHODS Eligibility includes adult patients with solitary supratentorial rMG (WHO grade 3/4); ≥ 4 weeks after chemotherapy, bevacizumab, or study drug; adequate organ function; and KPS ≥ 70%. Cohorts of 3 patients are treated with increasing doses of 2141-V11 to determine the maximum tolerated dose when administered sequentially following D2C7-IT (166,075 ng) via CED at 0.5 mL/hr. Five dose levels (DLs) are evaluated (2141-V11 at: #1: 0.70 mg; #2: 2.0 mg; #2**: 3.0 mg #2*: 4.0 mg; #3: 7.0 mg). RESULTS As of May 29, 2022, 13 patients were treated (3 patients on DL1, DL2, and DL2**; 2 patients on DL3 and DL2*). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed; however, lower DLs were added due to higher frequency of adverse events (AEs) expected with D2C7-IT+2141-V11 with DL3 and DL2* (fever, neurologic symptoms). All patients remain alive 0.7-10.6 months after therapy. Grade ≥ 2 AEs due to D2C7-IT+2141-V11 include: headache (grade 3, n = 1; grade 2, n = 4); pyramidal tract disorder (grade 3, n = 1; grade 2, n = 2); paresthesia (grade 3, n = 1); dysphasia (grade 3, n = 1); seizures (grade 2; n = 2); fever (grade 2; n = 2); and one each of grade 2 depressed level of consciousness, fatigue, and concentration impairment. Enrollment is ongoing. CONCLUSIONS Intratumoral administration of D2C7-IT+2141-V11 via CED is safe, encouraging efficacy results are observed.

BACKGROUND Nausea and vomiting remain the most feared cancer treatment-related side effects. Trials establishing antiemetic guidelines exclude malignant glioma (MG) patients. In MG patients receiving radiation with concurrent temozolomide, chemoradiation-induced nausea and vomiting (cRINV) rates are 35 and 26%, respectively, which reduce quality of life, treatment adherence, and potentially cancer control.OBJECTIVES: In a randomized phase II open label trial, we compared patient satisfaction and efficacy of ondansetron monotherapy (short-acting 5HT3-RA; 3h half-life) vs. rolapitant (long-acting NK1-RA; 180h half-life) plus ondansetron in preventing cRINV during 6-weeks of daily temozolomide (75 mg/m2/dX42d) with radiation. METHODS Fifty-three eligible patients receiving chemoradiation were randomized to Arm-A (ondansetron 8mg Days 1-42, rolapitant 180mg on Day 21) or Arm-B (rolapitant on Day 1 plus daily ondansetron). Primary endpoint included the percentage achieving cRINV-complete response (CR; no vomiting or antiemetic rescue) during the first 2-weeks of radiation. Secondary endpoints included cRIN/cRIV rates, preference for rolapitant plus ondansetron, and toxicity. RESULTS Forty-eight initiated protocol treatment. Mean age=53, 58% male, median KPS 90%, 71% low alcohol N/V risk factor, 73% glioblastoma. During the first 2-weeks of radiation, cRINV-CR was 60% for 25 evaluable patients receiving ondansetron monotherapy and 65% for 23 receiving rolapitant/ondansetron (p< 0.71). Patient-reported cRINV-CR was 61% and 74%, respectively (p< 0.41); cRIN rates (44% Arm-A; 53% Arm-B) were more than cRIV rates (28% Arm-A; 11% Arm-B). More patients receiving ondansetron alone vomited the first 2-weeks (22%) than with rolapitant/ondansetron (0%); p< 0.05. Among 32 patients who completed the study, patients preferred ondansetron (63%) over rolapitant/ondansetron (19%); p< 0.0039; 19% had no preference. Adverse events attributable to antiemetic treatment (fatigue/constipation) were all grade 1-2. CONCLUSIONS While patients prefer ondansetron monotherapy, there was no difference in cRINV-CR between the first 2-week treatments and some had less vomiting with rolapitant plus ondansetron. We will present overall N/V results.

Homozygous deletion of methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) is one of the most frequent genetic alterations in glioblastoma (GBM), but its pathologic consequences remain unclear. In this study, we report that loss of MTAP results in profound epigenetic reprogramming characterized by hypomethylation of PROM1/CD133–associated stem cell regulatory pathways. MTAP deficiency promotes glioma stem-like cell (GSC) formation with increased expression of PROM1/CD133 and enhanced tumorigenicity of GBM cells and is associated with poor prognosis in patients with GBM. As a combined consequence of purine production deficiency in MTAP-null GBM and the critical dependence of GSCs on purines, the enriched subset of CD133+ cells in MTAP-null GBM can be effectively depleted by inhibition of de novo purine synthesis. These findings suggest that MTAP loss promotes the pathogenesis of GBM by shaping the epigenetic landscape and stemness of GBM cells while simultaneously providing a unique opportunity for GBM therapeutics. Significance: This study links the frequently mutated metabolic enzyme MTAP to dysregulated epigenetics and cancer cell stemness and establishes MTAP status as a factor for consideration in characterizing GBM and developing therapeutic strategies.

Purpose: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have shown promise against solid tumors, but their efficacy has been limited, due in part, to immunosuppression by CD4+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs). Although lymphodepletion is commonly used to deplete Tregs, these regimens are nonspecific, toxic, and provide only a narrow window before Tregs repopulate hosts. Importantly, CARs have also been shown to inadvertently potentiate Tregs by providing a source of IL2 for Treg consumption. We explored whether disruption of the IL2 axis would confer efficacy against solid tumors without the need for lymphodepletion. Experimental Design: We developed second- (CD28z) and third- (CD28-4-1BBz) generation CARs targeting EGFRvIII. To eliminate secretion of IL2, 2 amino acid substitutions were introduced in the PYAP Lck–binding motif of the CD28 domain (ΔCD28). We evaluated CARs against B16 melanomas expressing EGFRvIII. Results: CD28z CARs failed to engraft in vivo. Although 4-1BB addition improved expansion, CD28-4-1BBz CARs required lymphodepletion to treat solid tumors. CARs deficient in Lck signaling, however, significantly retarded tumor growth without a need for lymphodepletion and this was dependent on inclusion of 4-1BB. To evaluate CAR vulnerability to Tregs, we lymphodepleted mice and transferred CARs alone or with purified Tregs. Cotransfer with Tregs abrogated the efficacy of CD28-4-1BBz CARs, whereas the efficacy of ΔCD28-4-1BBz CARs remained unperturbed. Conclusions: In the absence of lymphodepletion, CARs targeting solid tumors are hindered by Treg immunosuppression and poor persistence. Here, CARs were modified to circumvent Treg suppression and to simultaneously improve in vivo engraftment. Modified CARs treated solid tumors without a need for lymphodepletion.

Clinical trials that have a pharmacokinetic or a pharmacodynamic immunologic mechanism of action–based primary outcome could substantially improve the validity and efficiency of early development of immuno-oncology agents. Here, we outline different trial design options in this area, review examples from the literature and their unique immunologic aspects, and highlight how these trials have been underutilized. We illustrate how new technologies and translationally focused approaches can be successfully used to develop different classes of immunotherapeutic agents.

Glioblastoma (GBM) patients can use tumor-treating fields (TTFs) with adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) to treat their disease. TTFs involve wearing transfixed transducers to the shaved scalp, and the transducers are wired to a battery pack that is either fixed or carried (weighing 2.7 pounds). EF-14 clinical trial did evaluate health-related quality of life with standardized patient-report outcome measures but did not measure exercise behavior. We sought to evaluate the exercise behavior of GBM patients using TTFs. We consented GBM patients who intended to use TTFs with adjuvant TMZ after completion of chemoradiation. After informed consent and before starting TTFs, patients completed a self-administered questionnaire, Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire, to assess exercise behavior/physical function. To calculate our primary outcome of total exercise behavior, the frequency of exercise sessions per week within each intensity category was multiplied by the average reported duration, weighted by an estimate of the MET, summed across all intensities, and expressed as average MET-hr/wk. Prior work has defined that physical function can be compared as < 9 MET-h/wk vs. ≥ 9 MET-h/wk. We evaluated at baseline and up to 24-week exercise behavior in patients with TTFs vs. historical controls not using TTFs. We enrolled 19 total GBM patients, with 14 proceeding to use TTFs. Of the 14 patients on TTFs, seven patients (50%) completed ≥ 9 MET-h/wk of exercise, and this level was maintained 8, 16, and 24 weeks after starting TTFs. Six months after the completion of chemoradiation, mean MET-h/wk was decreased in the TTFs group (n=6) (10.71 sd=7.06) vs. historical controls (n=38) (27.35 sd=46.94). TTFs did not interfere with exercise behavior in our GBM cohort, but when compared to GBM patients not utilizing TTFs, there could be a long-term impact on exercise behavior. More research is needed to evaluate exercise behavior in GBM patients using TTFs.

BACKGROUND PVSRIPO is a live-attenuated recombinant rhino:poliovirus that mediates antitumor efficacy by engaging antitumor immunity. A subset (~20%) of patients with recurrent GBM (rGBM) survive >24 months after therapy. We previously reported that low tumor mutation burden (TMB) is associated with longer survival after PVSRIPO and immune checkpoint blockade therapy in rGBM, and that low TMB associates with higher inflammatory gene expression signatures in rGBM tumors. METHODS Clinical features were tested for association with survival after PVSRIPO therapy. Whole exome sequencing and RNA-sequencing of tumors were used to correlate mutational landscape, tumor mutation burden (TMB), and gene expression signatures of patient tumors with survival. An in vitro assay that measures inflammatory responses of patient PBMCs to PVSRIPO was performed. An independent cohort of paired primary and recurrent GBM tumors was used to assess longitudinal changes in TMB and gene expression signatures after standard of care treatment. RESULTS A short time to recurrence and low TMB associated with longer survival after PVSRIPO therapy; these features were not prognostic for longer survival in immunotherapy naïve rGBM cohorts. Unexpectedly, higher pre-treatment polio neutralizing antibody titers were also associated with longer survival after PVSRIPO therapy in two independent clinical cohorts. PBMCs from patients surviving longer after PVSRIPO therapy mounted higher TNF, but lower IFN-a responses after in vitro challenge with PVSRIPO. In analysis of paired primary vs recurrent GBM tumors, we discovered that patients with low TMB upon recurrence were more likely to experience increased tumor inflammation and suppression of overall TMB. Low TMB in rGBM tumors was also associated with neoantigen depletion. Collectively, these observations imply that patients with low TMB and/or shorter duration of standard of care therapy may have intact immune surveillance, and that pre-treatment immunological status may dictate survival response to polio virotherapy.

ObjectivesStandard 6-week and hypofractionated 3-week courses of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) are both options for older patients with glioblastoma (GBM), but deciding the optimal regimen can be challenging. This analysis explores clinical factors associated with selection of RT course, completion of RT, and outcomes following RT.Materials and MethodsThis IRB-approved retrospective analysis identified patients ≥70 years old with GBM who initiated adjuvant RT at our institution between 2004 and 2016. We identified factors associated with standard or hypofractionated RT using the Cochran-Armitage trend test, estimated time-to-event endpoints using the Kaplan-Meier method, and found predictors of overall survival (OS) using Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsSixty-two patients with a median age of 74 (range 70–90) initiated adjuvant RT, with 43 (69%) receiving standard RT and 19 (31%) receiving hypofractionated RT. Selection of short-course RT was associated with older age (p = 0.04) and poor KPS (p = 0.03). Eight (13%) patients did not complete RT, primarily for hospice care due to worsening symptoms. After a median follow-up of 37 months, median OS was 12.3 months (95% CI 9.0–15.1). Increased age (p < 0.05), poor KPS (p < 0.0001), lack of MGMT methylation (p < 0.05), and lack of RT completion (p < 0.0001) were associated with worse OS on multivariate analysis. In this small cohort, GTV size and receipt of standard or hypofractionated RT were not associated with OS.ConclusionsIn this cohort of older patients with GBM, age and KPS was associated with selection of short-course or standard RT. These regimens had similar OS, though a subset of patients experienced worsening symptoms during RT and discontinued treatment. Further investigation into predictors of RT completion and survival may help guide adjuvant therapies and supportive care for older patients.

INTRODUCTION While primary GBM is largely heterogeneous and devoid of homogeneously expressed neoantigens, mutant IDH1 (R132H) is a uniformly expressed hallmark in >70% of low grade gliomas. As such, IDH1 mutations represent a potentially valuable vaccination target. METHODS Here, we report an update on the immunogenicity results of the mutant IDH1 peptide vaccine alone and in combination with temozolomide (TMZ). In the phase I RESIST clinical trial (NCT02193347), patients with recurrent and resectable IDH1 R132H mutant grade 2 glioma received peptide vaccinations composed of 500 µg of mutant IDH1 peptide and 150 µg of GM-CSF mixed 1:1 with Montanide adjuvant prior to surgical resection. Vaccines 1, 2, and 3 were given 15 (+/-) 3 days apart. 7-12 days after vaccine 3, patients underwent standard of care tumor (SOC) resection. After resection, patients with grade 2 gliomas were given up to 15 doses of peptide vaccine in combination with TMZ regimens while patients with transformed grade 3 gliomas were given up to 15 doses of peptide vaccine in combination with SOC radiation therapy + TMZ regimens. T cell responses against the mutant peptide were measured after vaccine 3 using IFN-γ ELISPOT and intracellular flow cytometry for IL-2, TNFα,and IFNγ. RESULTS 3/20 patients were taken off the study before completion of study related activities. 1/20 patients progressed before completion of all vaccines. Out of 134 total doses of vaccine delivered, only one dose generated a grade 2 or higher injection site reaction according to the CTCAE guidelines. Vaccination with the mutant peptide led to an overall increase in IFN-γ+ spot-forming splenocytes specific to the mutant peptide (p=0.0408). CONCLUSION Administering the mutant IDH1 peptide vaccine in patients with recurrent IDH-mutant gliomas was able to induce anti-IDH1 R132H immune responses in this initial phase I study.

BACKGROUND Low grade gliomas (LGGs) develop in young adults and represent 10-15% of all glial tumors. While LGG patients can have longer survival than higher grade tumors, progression, transformation, and ultimately mortality occurs. Mutations in Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 (IDH1/IDH2) are prevalent in LGG and are responsible for gliomagenesis. The classic IDH1 mutation is located at 132 codon and represented as p.Arg132His, but there are non-canonical IDH1 and IDH2 mutations. We sought to compare clinical characteristics of LGG patients with classic IDH1 p.Arg132His mutation to LGG patients with non-canonical IDH1 and IDH2 mutations. METHODS We queried an IRB-approved registry retrospectively from 12/2004- 9/2019. We included IDH1/IDH2 mutant LGG (WHO grade II) and known IDH1 and IDH2 targeted mutation analysis using standard PCR followed by DNA sequencing to detect point mutations in IDH1/IDH2 genes. We obtained available clinical and histopathological data. We estimated progression-free survival (PFS), time to transformation (TT), and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS We identified 267 LGG patients with median follow-up of 9.1 yrs (95%CI 8.4-9.9 yrs). Classic IDH1 p.Arg132His mutation occurred in 223 (83.9%) patients. IDH2 mutations occurred in 14 (5.2%) patients. Non-canonical IDH1 mutations were in 30 (11.2%) patients and included the following mutations: p.Arg132Cys (13), p.Arg132Gly (10), p.Arg132Ser (4), p.Arg132Leu (1), p.Arg119Gln (1), and p.Arg172Met (1). Initial presentation, OS, and TT did not differ between IDH1/IDH2 groups. PFS differed significantly between groups with improved median PFS in IDH2 mutant LGG (5.4 yrs; 95%CI 3.5-25.2) versus classic IDH1 mutant LGG (4.1 yrs; 95%CI 3.7-4.9 yrs) and non-canonical IDH1 mutant LGG (2.6 yrs; 95%CI 2.1-4.8) (log-rank p=0.019). Notably, non-canonical mutations were more common in astrocytoma (22/30; 73.3%) than other LGG histologies (p=0.018). CONCLUSIONS In this cohort, LGG patients with non-canonical mutations have a shorter time to progression than patients with classic p.Arg132His mutation and IDH2 mutations.

INTRODUCTION We previously reported to SNO, high levels of psychosocial distress in adult patients with primary brain tumors (PBTs), particularly during the first 6 months following diagnosis. The purpose of this follow-up study was to identify patterns of distress among older (≥ 65 years) patients with glioblastoma (GBM) compared to their younger (ages 18-64) counterparts. METHODS In our initial cross-sectional study, we collected the National Comprehensive Cancer Network’s Distress Thermometer (NCCN-DT) and problem list from adult patients with PBTs (WHO grades I-IV) seen at our institution between December 2013 and February 2016. We performed subsequent analyses on a subset of patients with GBM. RESULTS We identified 343 patients with GBM from the original dataset, of which 23.0% (n= 78) were ≥ 65 years old. The proportion of patients ≥ 65 years old with elevated distress (i.e. DT ≥ 4) was greater than the proportion of younger patients reporting elevated distress (47.4% vs 30.6%; p= 0.0068). Elevated distress was significantly greater during the first 6 months post diagnosis for all ages (p= 0.008). In subgroup analyses, a decrease in distress beyond 6 months was seen in younger patients (45.7% vs 27.4%; p= 0.021), but not in older patients. In older patients, a greater number of problems were selected on the NCCN DT and problem list tool: emotional and physical concerns were reported more frequently compared to their younger counterparts. Older patients were more likely to report difficulty with “bathing” and “getting around” (p= 0.009, p< 0.001, respectively). There were no differences in older versus younger GBM patients with regard to housing, transportation, treatment decisions, depression, fatigue, or memory. CONCLUSIONS In contrast to their younger counterparts, older patients with GBM experienced elevated levels of distress and a greater absolute number of specific psychosocial problems, mostly related to emotional and physical concerns.

Despite standard of care for glioblastoma, including gross total resection, high-dose radiation, and dose-limited chemotherapy, this tumor remains one of the most aggressive and therapeutically challenging. The relatively small number of patients with this diagnosis compared with more common solid tumors in clinical trials commits new glioblastoma therapies to testing in small, underpowered, nonrandomized settings. Among approximately 200 registered glioblastoma trials identified between 2005 and 2015, nearly half were single-arm studies with sample sizes not exceeding 50 patients. These constraints have made demonstrating efficacy for novel therapies difficult in glioblastoma and other rare and aggressive cancers. Novel immunotherapies for glioblastoma such as vaccination with dendritic cells (DC) have yielded mixed results in clinical trials. To address limited numbers, we sequentially conducted three separate clinical trials utilizing cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific DC vaccines in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma whereby each follow-up study had nearly doubled in sample size. Follow-up data from the first blinded, randomized phase II clinical trial (NCT00639639) revealed that nearly one third of this cohort is without tumor recurrence at 5 years from diagnosis. A second clinical trial (NCT00639639) resulted in a 36% survival rate at 5 years from diagnosis. Results of the first two-arm trial (NCT00639639) showed increased migration of the DC vaccine to draining lymph nodes, and this increased migration has been recapitulated in our larger confirmatory clinical study (NCT02366728). We have now observed that nearly one third of the glioblastoma study patient population receiving CMV-specific DC vaccines results in exceptional long-term survivors.

T-cell dysfunction contributes to tumor immune escape in patients with cancer and is particularly severe amidst glioblastoma (GBM). Among other defects, T-cell lymphopenia is characteristic, yet often attributed to treatment. We reveal that even treatment-naïve patients and mice with GBM can harbor AIDS-level CD4 counts, as well as contracted, T-cell deficient lymphoid organs. Missing naïve T-cells are instead found sequestered in large numbers in the bone marrow. This phenomenon characterizes not only GBM but a variety of other cancers, although only when tumors are introduced into the intracranial compartment. T-cell sequestration is accompanied by tumor-imposed loss of S1P1 from the T-cell surface and is reversible upon precluding S1P1 internalization. In murine models of GBM, hindering S1P1 internalization and reversing sequestration licenses T-cell-activating therapies that were previously ineffective. Sequestration of T-cells in bone marrow is therefore a tumor-adaptive mode of T-cell dysfunction, whose reversal may constitute a promising immunotherapeutic adjunct.

Background The investigation of exercise training in metastatic breast cancer has received minimal attention. This study determined the feasibility and safety of aerobic training in metastatic breast cancer. Methods Sixty-five women (age, 21-80 years) with metastatic (stage IV) breast cancer (57% were receiving chemotherapy, and >40% had ≥ 2 lines of prior therapy) were allocated to an aerobic training group (n = 33) or a stretching group (n = 32). Aerobic training consisted of 36 supervised treadmill walking sessions delivered thrice weekly between 55% and 80% of peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak ) for 12 consecutive weeks. Stretching was matched to aerobic training with respect to location, frequency, duration, and intervention length. The primary endpoint was aerobic training feasibility, which was a priori defined as the lost to follow-up (LTF) rate ( Results One of the 33 patients (3%) receiving aerobic training was LTF, whereas the mean attendance rate was 63% ± 30%. The rates of permanent discontinuation and dose modification were 27% and 49%, respectively. Intention-to-treat analyses indicated improvements in PROs, which favored the attention control group (P values > .05). Per protocol analyses indicated that 14 of 33 patients (42%) receiving aerobic training had acceptable tolerability (relative dose intensity ≥ 70%), and this led to improvements in VO2peak and functional capacity (P values Conclusions Aerobic training at the dose and schedule tested is safe but not feasible for a significant proportion of patients with metastatic breast cancer. The acceptable feasibility and promising benefit for select patients warrant further evaluation in a dose-finding phase 1/2 study. Cancer 2018;124:2552-60. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Median survival for glioblastoma (GBM) remains Significance: A randomized pilot trial in patients with GBM implicates polyfunctional T-cell responses as a biomarker for effective antitumor immunotherapy. Cancer Res; 78(1); 256–64. ©2017 AACR.

INTRODUCTION Vaccination with dendritic cells (DCs) fares poorly in primary and recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Moreover, GBM vaccine trials are often underpowered due to limited sample size. METHODS To address these limitations, we conducted three sequential clinical trials utilizing Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific DC vaccines in patients with primary GBM. Autologous DCs were generated and electroporated with mRNA encoding for the CMV protein pp65. Serial vaccination was given throughout adjuvant temozolomide cycles, and 111Indium radiolabeling was implemented to assess migration efficiency of DC vaccines. Patients were followed for median overall survival (mOS) and OS. RESULTS Our initial study was the phase II ATTAC study (NCT00639639; total n=12) with 6 patients randomized to vaccine site preconditioning with tetanus-diphtheria (Td) toxoid. This led to an expanded cohort trial (ATTAC-GM; NCT00639639) of 11 patients receiving CMV DC vaccines containing granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Follow-up data from ATTAC and ATTAC-GM revealed 5-year OS rates of 33.3% (mOS 38.3 months; CI95 17.5-undefined) and 36.4% (mOS 37.7 months; CI95 18.2-109.1), respectively. ATTAC additionally revealed a significant increase in DC migration to draining lymph nodes following Td preconditioning (P=0.049). Increased DC migration was associated with OS (Cox proportional hazards model, HR=0.820, P=0.023). Td-mediated increased migration has been recapitulated in our larger confirmatory trial ELEVATE (NCT02366728) of 43 patients randomized to preconditioning (Wilcoxon rank sum, Td n=24, unpulsed DC n=19; 24h, P=0.031 and 48h, P=0.0195). In ELEVATE, median follow-up of 42.2 months revealed significantly longer OS in patients randomized to Td (P=0.026). The 3-year OS for Td-treated patients in ELEVATE was 34% (CI95 19-63%) compared to 6% given unpulsed DCs (CI95 1-42%). CONCLUSION We report reproducibility of our findings across three sequential clinical trials using CMV pp65 DCs. Despite their small numbers, these successive trials demonstrate consistent survival outcomes, thus supporting the efficacy of CMV DC vaccine therapy in GBM.

INTRODUCTION Cancer vaccines involve the administration of tumor-associated antigens into the host to generate anti-tumor T cell responses. Glioblastoma (GBM) is a disease with poor prognosis. GBM has a limited number of immunotherapeutic targets due to low mutational load, and is also highly heterogeneous; targeting a single antigen leads to antigen escape and tumor growth. METHODS VMDK mice were subcutaneously implanted with 750,000 SMA560 cells and on days 1 and 8 post implantation, mice were treated with 15 nmol of the universal helper epitope, P30, conjoined to the MHCI-restricted neoepitopes Odc1MHCI-P30 or Topbp1MHCI-P30. Human CD27 (hCD27) transgenic mice were intracranially implanted with CT2A-Odc1, followed by anti-CD27 and 15 nmol of Odc1MHCI-P30. B16.OVA or B16.F10 tumor cells were intracranially implanted in hCD27 mice and received SIINFEKL-P30 or Trp2-P30 conjoined peptides. Tumor growth, survival, or IFNγ secretion of splenic or tumor-infiltrating cells was assessed. RESULTS Unlike Odc1MHCI mixed with P30, conjoined Odc1MHCI-P30 had equivalent immunogenicity and anti-tumor efficacy to that observed with native long Odc1 peptide. Native long peptide of Topbp1 did not elicit an antitumor response, yet Topbp1MHCI-P30 caused an increase in numbers of IFNγ-secreting splenocytes and a decrease in tumor growth and similar to that seen with Odc1MHCI-P30 . Anti-CD27 treatment significantly increased numbers of IFNγ secreting splenocytes in Odc1MHCI-P30 vaccinated hCD27 mice, and the use of anti-CD27 with Odc1MHCI-P30 achieved long-term survival in 90% of tumor bearing hCD27 mice. Anti-CD27 synergized with SIINFEKL-P30 and Trp2-P30 to significantly improve survival after administration of these peptides. CONCLUSIONS Our work shows that poorly immunogenic neoantigens can be conjoined to P30 and used to generate an anti-tumor response in mouse models of GBM, and anti-tumor responses of conjoined peptides can be enhanced with anti-CD27 treatment. Together, these data demonstrate the efficacy of neoantigen vaccines for the treatment of heterogeneous GBM.

INTRODUCTION There is increasing recognition that palliative care (PC) can benefit patients with advanced cancers. However, early referral to PC is not yet a reality for patients diagnosed with a primary brain tumor. We hypothesize that lack of knowledge and/or misperceptions regarding PC by patients, caregivers, or their providers remain barriers. METHODS This is an IRB-exempt, one-time QR-accessible REDcap questionnaire administered to patients, caregivers, and providers at the Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center between September 2020 and May 2021. We administered 9 questions regarding knowledge and beliefs about PC from the Health Information National Trends Survey 5, Cycle 2: results of this nationally representative U.S. sample are publicly available and used for comparison. RESULTS We had 141 survey respondents: 25 providers, 59 patients, and 57 caregivers. The median patient and caregiver ages were 49 (21-74) and 50 years (24-73), respectively. Caregivers were more likely female (55.2 %) and identified as a spouse or domestic partner (58.2%). Providers, were equally distributed by years of experience. Compared to patients and caregivers, providers reported more baseline knowledge of PC (p< 0.0001, p< 0.0001) and better understood the role of PC in pain/symptom management (p=0.0038, p=0.0087) and social/emotional support (p=0.0044, p=0.0279). Interestingly, most providers (76.0%) disagreed with the statement “the goal of palliative care is to give patients more time at the end of life.” Compared to a general U.S. sample (n=1,162) our patients (n=39) were better informed in only 2 of 9 questions. Whereas, caregivers (n=48) were better informed in 6 of 9 questions. CONCLUSION Neuro-oncology providers were knowledgeable, but a minor gap in understanding the goal of PC was identified. Caregivers were overall more knowledgeable than patients. However, Neuro-oncology patients, had similar knowledge and beliefs compared to a nationally representative sample. PC interventions should prioritize filling knowledge gaps for Neuro-oncology patients.

INTRODUCTION The use of telemedicine increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the impact on patient satisfaction in the Neuro-oncology population is unknown. This quality improvement project compares outpatient satisfaction before and during the COVID-19 pandemic as well as in-person versus telemedicine platforms during the pandemic. METHODS We performed an IRB-exempt retrospective analysis of aggregate de-identified outpatient satisfaction scores among Neuro-oncology patients seen at The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center (PRTBTC) at Duke University. The Clinician & Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CG-CAHPS) is a survey developed and distributed by Press Ganey Associates, and is the most widely used outpatient satisfaction survey in the United States. We compared pre-COVID-19 CG-CAHPS scores from patients who received in-person care at the PRBTC between April 2019 and March 2020 to COVID-19 pandemic CG-CAHPS scores (i.e. those who received either telemedicine or in-person care at the PRTBTC) from April 2020 to March 2021. RESULTS Approximately 1448 surveys were completed for both in-person and telemedicine visits. During the pandemic, 48.6% of surveys represented telemedicine, with monthly variations from 84.6% (April 2020) to 21.4% (March 2021). Patient satisfaction scores pre-COVID-19 were similar to those during the pandemic: overall provider rating from 0-10 (9.28 v 9.36), knowledge of medical history (96.9% v 95.4%), listens carefully (96.6% v 96.9%), shows respect (97.2% v 98.1%), and time spent (93.2% v 95.5%). During the COVID-19 pandemic, in-person and telemedicine demonstrate similar levels of satisfaction: overall provider rating from 0-10 (9.29 v 9.48), knowledge of medical history (94.9% v 96.1%), listens carefully (95.4% v 99.0%), shows respect (97.5% v 99.0%), and time spent (94.7% v 96.7%). CONCLUSION Outpatient satisfaction prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic was similar. Patients reported similar satisfaction between in-person and telemedicine platforms. We support the ongoing use of telemedicine for outpatient Neuro-oncology.

INTRODUCTION Approximately 30% of glioblastomas harbor the tumor specific EGFRvIII mutation. hEGFRvIII-CD3 bi-scFv (Brain Bi-Specific T Cell Engager - BRiTE) is a novel bispecific antibody construct which can redirect a patient’s entire repertoire of T cells (TCR-agnostic) to specifically lyse EGFRvIII-positive tumor cells. Compared to CAR-T therapy, it offers a highly potent yet off-the-shelf approach for glioblastoma. BRiTE is now entering Phase I clinical trials (NCT04903795) and will be trialed as a monotherapy or with autologous T cell infusion. Migration of T cell binding macromolecules across the blood-brain barrier may be facilitated by activated T cells which adhere to the microvascular endothelium and enter the brain parenchyma. Concurrent administration of activated T cells could therefore enhance trafficking of BRiTE and other antibody-based macromolecules into the intracerebral compartment. HYPOTHESIS We hypothesize that treatment of EGFRvIII-positive WHO grade IV malignant glioma with BRiTE alone or with peripheral T-cell infusion is safe and can induce objective tumor shrinkage at tolerable doses. TRIAL DESIGN/OBJECTIVES A maximum of 18 patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent WHO grade IV malignant EGFRvIII+ glioma will be enrolled after undergoing standard of care treatment. The primary objective will be evaluating the safety of BRiTE alone and with autologous T cell infusion. Patients will receive a single BRiTE infusion, followed 14 days later by an infusion of activated autologous T cells and a second bolus BRiTE infusion. Dose escalation and de-escalation will be managed using a Bayesian optimal interval design. Secondary objectives will be to describe clinical benefit as determined by objective response rate per mRANO criteria, and to evaluate BRiTE pharmacokinetics in serum. CONCLUSION We describe a first-in-human trial of bispecific T cell engager therapy for glioblastoma. We also describe our novel approach for enhancing intracranial penetration of BRiTE using autologous T cell infusion.

Prognosis of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) is poor with 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6) ranging from 9 to 48% depending on the treatment regimen and use of anti-angiogenic therapies. We sought to study vorinostat (VOR), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in combination with bevacizumab (BEV) and daily metronomic temozolomide (TMZ) in a Phase I/II trial in recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGGs). This was a Phase I/II open-label, single-arm study in recurrent HGG patients. Phase I primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of VOR with BEV and daily TMZ. Phase II primary endpoint was PFS6. Regimen was BEV 10 mg/kg iv every 2 weeks, TMZ 50 mg/m2 po daily, and VOR 200 or 400 mg po alternating 7 days on then 7 days off throughout a 28-day cycle. Phase I portion enrolled nine subjects with three receiving VOR 200 mg and 6 receiving VOR 400 mg. With no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at 200 mg and one DLT (thrombocytopenia, Grade 3) at 400 mg, the MTD was 400 mg. Phase II portion enrolled 39 GBM subjects, and PFS6 was 53.8% (95% CI 37.2–67.9%). Of note, 14 subjects had received prior BEV and all had received prior 5-day TMZ. Combination therapy with VOR, BEV, and daily TMZ was well tolerated and safe. While PFS6 was not statistically improved beyond historical controls, it is important to note that this was a heavily pretreated GBM population and further consideration is warranted in a less pretreated group.

Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers excellent local control for brain metastases (BM) with low rates of toxicity. Radiation necrosis (RN) may occur after treatment and is challenging to distinguish from local recurrence (LR). We evaluated enlarging brain lesions following SRS that were subsequently biopsied to differentiate RN versus LR. Methods This study reviewed patients receiving SRS for BM between 2008 and 2012 who underwent a biopsy for suspicion of RN versus LR on MRI. Data collection included demographics, radiation parameters, imaging findings, and post-biopsy pathology. Kaplan-Meier methods determined overall survival. Fisher's exact test assessed for association between lesion biopsy result and variables of interest. Results Thirty-four patients with 35 biopsied BM were included. Lesions were biopsied a median of 8.8 months after SRS. Most patients had primary lung cancer (11; 31.4%). Eleven (31.4%) biopsies were positive for LR and 24 (68.6%) showed RN only. Median overall survival was longer for patients with RN (31.0 mo) than for patients with LR (14.5 mo; P = 0.135). Time from SRS to biopsy was significantly different between RN and LR groups; 10 lesions (52.5%) biopsied ≤9 months after SRS showed LR, whereas 1 lesion (6.3%) biopsied >9 months after SRS showed LR (P = 0.004). For 16 (65.7%) lesions, management was changed or directed by the biopsy results. Conclusions Stereotactic biopsy for accessible enlarging lesions after SRS appears diagnostically valuable in patients with few lesions and changes clinical management. RN should be suspected in patients with an enlarging lesion more than 9 months post-SRS.

Purpose: Patients with glioblastoma have less than 15-month median survival despite surgical resection, high-dose radiation, and chemotherapy with temozolomide. We previously demonstrated that targeting cytomegalovirus pp65 using dendritic cells (DC) can extend survival and, in a separate study, that dose-intensified temozolomide (DI-TMZ) and adjuvant granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) potentiate tumor-specific immune responses in patients with glioblastoma. Here, we evaluated pp65-specific cellular responses following DI-TMZ with pp65-DCs and determined the effects on long-term progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Experimental Design: Following standard-of-care, 11 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma received DI-TMZ (100 mg/m2/d × 21 days per cycle) with at least three vaccines of pp65 lysosome–associated membrane glycoprotein mRNA-pulsed DCs admixed with GM-CSF on day 23 ± 1 of each cycle. Thereafter, monthly DI-TMZ cycles and pp65-DCs were continued if patients had not progressed. Results: Following DI-TMZ cycle 1 and three doses of pp65-DCs, pp65 cellular responses significantly increased. After DI-TMZ, both the proportion and proliferation of regulatory T cells (Tregs) increased and remained elevated with serial DI-TMZ cycles. Median PFS and OS were 25.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 11.0–∞] and 41.1 months (95% CI, 21.6–∞), exceeding survival using recursive partitioning analysis and matched historical controls. Four patients remained progression-free at 59 to 64 months from diagnosis. No known prognostic factors [age, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), IDH-1/2 mutation, and MGMT promoter methylation] predicted more favorable outcomes for the patients in this cohort. Conclusions: Despite increased Treg proportions following DI-TMZ, patients receiving pp65-DCs showed long-term PFS and OS, confirming prior studies targeting cytomegalovirus in glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res; 23(8); 1898–909. ©2017 AACR.

OBJECTIVE There is no validated model for delivering palliative care (PC) in the glioblastoma (GBM) population. The primary objectives were to assess the feasibility and determine the acceptability of a time-based model of integrated specialty PC to patients and providers. Secondary objectives were to estimate the impact on healthcare utilization and quality of life (QoL) compared to historical controls. METHODS We consented and referred patients to PC at their initial Neuro-Oncology consultation between 4/2018 and 5/2019. We conducted QoL assessments (NCCN Distress Tool; Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-BR); Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F); Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)) at (1) baseline (2) immediately after chemoradiation, and (3) 6 months following chemoradiation. Ongoing PC follow-up was at the discretion of the PC provider. We administered the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) before and after PC visits. We measured patient and referring provider satisfaction using FAMCARE-16 and a PC departmental survey, respectively. RESULTS We did not meet our goal enrollment of 50 patients. 32 were offered participation, 12 consented and 8 attended at least one PC visit. The mean number of PC visits was 1.6. Mean age was 62 (42–79). 75% had a KPS ≥80. Of those that did not complete the study, 2 died and 5 either withdrew consent or declined further visits. At baseline, 91.7 % had a NCCN distress score ≥4. Patients were overall satisfied with the intervention. CONCLUSION Introduction of specialty PC at the time of GBM diagnosis is challenging. Participants reported their experience as overall positive. Results from referring providers are pending. Due to low-enrollment we did not pursue further statistical comparisons regarding healthcare utilization compared to historical controls.

BACKGROUND Outpatient clinics treating neuro-oncology patients are becoming more multidisciplinary. Utilization of all team members is critical for the holistic care of these complex patients. Specifically, the role of a clinical pharmacist in the ambulatory multidisciplinary clinic remains undefined and will likely evolve as more therapeutic options are developed to treat central nervous system malignancies. We queried the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) membership about the availability of a clinical pharmacist in their ambulatory setting and, if present, the role of that clinical pharmacist. METHODS In an IRB exempt study, we surveyed the SNO community (targeting primarily clinicians) and analyzed responses to queries about clinical pharmacists in the ambulatory neuro-oncology setting. RESULTS Of the 65 SNO members who responded, 52 of these were clinical members. Of these 52 clinical members, the majority were physicians (88.5%, n=46). Of these 46 physicians, most were in academic practices (93.5%, n=43). Over half of the 52 clinical respondents (51.9%, n=27) reported that they saw ≥ 30 primary brain tumor patients a month, thus typifying busy clinical neuro-oncology ambulatory clinics. Despite having busy clinics, only 12 (28.6%) of the 42 providers with access to a clinical pharmacist reported that their clinical pharmacist was solely dedicated to neuro-oncology patients. For the respondents who had access to a clinical pharmacist, only 28 (66.7%) of those pharmacists had direct patient interaction in the clinic. The top three roles of the clinical pharmacist included medication review (81%, n=34), chemotherapy dosing and modifications (73.8%, n=31), and practice guideline development (61.9%, n=26), none of which are associated with direct patient interaction. CONCLUSIONS We found that while our surveyed population of SNO clinical members have demanding outpatient neuro-oncology practices, most do not have the support or expertise of dedicated neuro-oncology clinical pharmacists.

BACKGROUND Low grade gliomas (LGGs) represent 10–15% of glial tumors in adults and while LGG patients have a better prognosis over high-grade gliomas, these cancers ultimately recur and transform to more aggressive tumors. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) is commonly mutated in LGG, and when mutated, it is the oncogenic driver by leading to the production of oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG). We developed a phase 1 study for recurrent resectable IDH1 mutant LGG utilizing a tumor-specific peptide vaccine targeting IDH1 mutant protein that spans the mutated region of IDHR132H (PEPIDH1M vaccine). METHODS We performed a phase 1, single-center, clinical trial in recurrent resectable IDH1 mutant WHO grade II glioma patients. Subjects received three PEPIDH1M vaccine q2wks and then proceeded to surgical resection. If subject’s tumor retained grade II status, then the subject proceeded with 12 cycles of daily TMZ (50 mg/m2 X 28 days) and PEPIDH1M vaccine (12 injections q4wks). If subject’s tumor transformed to grade III, then subject proceeded to radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent TMZ followed by 12 cycles of daily TMZ (50 mg/m2 X 28 days) and PEPIDH1M vaccine (12 injections q4wks). Primary endpoint was safety of PEPIDH1M vaccine in combination with adjuvant TMZ and/or XRT/TMZ and evaluable subjects needed to receive ≥6 PEPIDH1M vaccines. We assessed safety using CTCAE 4.03. RESULTS We enrolled 24 recurrent LGG subjects with mean age of 43.8 yrs (sd=11.4 yrs). Twenty subjects completed ≥6 PEPIDH1M vaccines. Most common related toxicity was grade 1 injection site reaction (N=20) and skin induration (n=17) with no grade 3–4 related toxicities. CONCLUSIONS PEPIDH1M vaccine in combination with surgical resection, daily TMZ and/or RT + TMZ with daily TMZ was safe and well tolerated in recurrent IDH1 mutant LGG. We are currently exploring secondary/correlative endpoints including immunogenicity of PEPIDH1M vaccine and magnetic resonance spectroscopy for 2-HG.

BACKGROUND The live attenuated oral poliovirus vaccine was modified to contain a heterologous internal ribosomal entry site stemming from human rhinovirus type 2, creating PVSRIPO. PVSRIPO recognizes CD155, an oncofetal cell adhesion molecule and tumor antigen widely expressed ectopically in malignancy. We have previously reported that deep sequencing of biopsy material obtained prior to PVSRIPO infusion confirmed that a very low mutational load is associated with longer survival. METHODS Patient tumor material from both phase I and 2 clinical trials was collected pre PVSRIPO. When available, post-treatment tissue from longitudinal samples were also collected. Tissue was subjected to RNA sequencing, histological analysis, and flow cytometry analysis. RNAseq analyses were performed comparing pre- and post- treatment expression profiles and computational predictions of tumor immune composition deciphered changes after PVSRIPO therapy. Histology and flow cytometry quantitated myeloid, CD8/4/regulatory T cell densities, and other immune cell types after treatment and compared to baseline tissue similarly analyzed to detect changes. RESULTS To date, analysis of phase 1 trial data has demonstrated a correlation between low TMB and increased markers of immunological gene expression profiles. This trend was not observed in TCGA samples that were almost exclusively primary GBM suggesting and interplay with prior therapy or evolution with recurrence. CONCLUSION Our findings presented here suggest that response to PVSRIPO therapy, and possibly that of other modalities engaging innate antiviral signatures in situ, may be dependent upon prevailing tumor microenvironment composition/status at the time of treatment.

We sought to identify characteristics of glioblastoma (GBM) patients with short survival (< 10 months) in order to identify prognostic factors useful for guiding treatment management. This is an IRB-approved retrospective analysis of adult newly diagnosed GBM patients from 2008–2016 who survived < 10 months from diagnosis. We extracted demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment details. We calculated survival from surgical diagnosis to date of death. The cohort includes 197 subjects (61% male) with a median age of 68 years (range 19–94). The majority (93%) are non-Hispanic white. The cohort has a median survival of 144 days (95% CI: 130–160). We focused on traditional prognostic indicators, including extent of surgical resection and KPS. A majority had biopsy only (n=92, 46.7%) rather than gross total (n=59, 29.9%) or subtotal (n=46, 23.4%) resection. Moreover, 160 out of 197 patients had a documented KPS with a majority being below 90 (KPS=70–80 (n=96); KPS < 70 (n=31)). Of 179 patients with data on RT course, 18% (n=32) received no RT or opted for hospice after diagnosis, 3% (n=6) received only RT, 54% (n=97) received RT+temozolomide (TMZ), and 24% (n=43) received RT+TMZ+bevacizumab. Of the 147 subjects receiving RT, 79% completed their RT course as prescribed. Most commonly, RT was prescribed as a 6- to 6-1/2-week course (85%), typically 59.4 Gy (45Gy primary, 14.4Gy boost) over 33 fractions or 60 Gy over 30 fractions. In contrast, 15% received a 3-week RT course, typically scheduled as 15 fractions of 2.667 Gy. We concluded that GBM patients with survival < 10 months were more likely to have biopsy only and a KPS < 90, notably associated with poorer prognosis. We continue to explore this dataset for further prognostic factors, particularly inability to complete planned RT course, and are comparing these traits to a larger cohort.

With a bleak prognosis for malignant glioma, maintaining quality of life (QoL) and decreasing distress of the patient are important in the clinical care of the patient. Mindfulness meditation is a mind-body therapy that has been recently investigated in the oncology field as a non-pharmacological strategy to ameliorate cancer symptoms and to improve QoL. This practice has not been studied in the primary brain tumor population. We initiated a pilot study among newly diagnosed brain tumor patients with the hypothesis that mindfulness meditation practice may benefit the patient by decreasing stress and anxiety and provide a means to cope with their new diagnosis. The specific aim of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility of a mindfulness meditation program to this population during standard of care chemoradiation and to determine whether it merits additional research in a subsequent trial. The intervention consists of six weekly one hour telephone-based mindfulness sessions followed by one in- person mindfulness session consisting of: mindfulness and healing, understanding stress, abiding in kindness, working with difficult emotions, finding peace, going forward and living fully. Subjects are provided with downloadable guided meditations. We plan to enroll fifteen newly diagnosed WHO grade III or IV malignant glioma subjects prior to their 6 week chemoradiation course. We will determine the percentage of subjects approached vs enrolled, number of sessions that each subject attends, completion of study questionnaires and satisfaction of the subjects. QoL surveys include: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Brain, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Cognitive Function, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue and the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire – short form. 13 subjects have been approached and 8 signed consent over a two-month period. We will provide final study results at time of presentation.

BACKGROUND: An impermeable blood–brain barrier and drug efflux via ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters such as p-glycoprotein may contribute to underwhelming efficacy of peripherally delivered agents to treat diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG). OBJECTIVE: To explore the pharmacological augmentation of convection-enhanced delivery (CED) infusate for DIPG. METHODS: The efficacy of CED dasatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in a transgenic H3.3K27M mutant murine model was assessed. mRNA expression of ABCB1 (p-glycoprotein) was analyzed in 14 tumor types in 274 children. In Vitro viability studies of dasatinib, the p-glycoprotein inhibitor, tariquidar, and dexamethasone were performed in 2 H3.3K27M mutant cell lines. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to evaluate CED infusate (gadolinium/dasatinib) distribution in animals pretreated with tariquidar and dexamethasone. Histological assessment of apoptosis was performed. RESULTS: Continuous delivery CED dasatinib improved median overall survival (OS) of animals harboring DIPG in comparison to vehicle (39.5 and 28.5 d, respectively; P = .0139). Mean ABCB1 expression was highest in K27M gliomas. In Vitro, the addition of tariquidar and dexamethasone further enhanced the efficacy of dasatinib (P

e14002 Background: It is estimated that 30% of patients with metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer will develop brain metastases. Current standard of care options for HER2+ breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBrM) includes radiation therapy (stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS] or whole brain radiation), brain permeable systemic therapies, and in select cases, neurosurgical resection. A multimodal approach combining these different treatment modalities has improved the overall survival and functional outcomes of patients with BCBrM. Some HER2-directed systemic therapies, however, may increase the risk of radiation necrosis (RN), a longer-term consequence of SRS. This study explores the impact of timing and type of systemic therapies on the development of RN in patients treated with SRS for HER2+ BCBrM. Methods: This was a single-institution, retrospective study including patients ≥18 years of age with HER2+ BCBrM who received SRS between 2013 and 2018 at Duke University with at least 12-month post-SRS follow-up. Presence of RN was determined at one-year post-SRS. Demographics, radiotherapy parameters (total dose, fractions, clinical target volume [CTV], gross tumor volume [GTV], conformity index [CI], volume receiving 12 gray [V12Gy]), and timing (during [within 4 weeks of SRS] vs. not during SRS) and type of systemic therapy (HER2-directed therapy, mitosis inhibitors, DNA synthesis inhibitors, others) were evaluated. Results: Among 46 patients with HER2+ BCBrM who received SRS, 28 (60.9%) developed RN and 18 (39.1%) did not. Age at time of SRS did not differ between those who developed RN and those who did not (mean 53.3 vs 50.4 years, respectively). There was a higher percentage of African Americans in the RN group (28.6% vs 11.1%, p = 0.3). There were no significant differences between the measured radiotherapy parameters—including dose, fraction, CTV, GTV, CI, V12Gy—between the two groups (all p > 0.05). Receipt of any type of systemic therapy during SRS did not differ between patients who did or did not develop RN (60.7% vs 55.6%, p = 0.97). However, patients who developed RN more commonly received more than one line of HER2-directed therapy independent of SRS timing compared to those who did not develop RN (75.0% vs 44.4%, p = 0.08). In fact, a significantly higher proportion of those who developed RN received more than one line of HER2-directed therapy during SRS compared to those did not develop RN (35.7% vs 5.6%, p

1041 Background: BCBMs are very common in metastatic HER2+ breast cancer. CNS-directed local therapy is the gold standard for treatment, followed by systemic HER2-targeted therapies. In patients with HER2+ BCBM and stable extracranial disease (ECD), consensus guidelines recommend continuing current systemic therapy after local therapy. Our goal was to determine the implications of ECD status at time of HER2+ BCBM first CNS involvement on outcomes including intracranial progression-free survival (PFS1) and overall survival (OS). Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on data extracted from 77 patients with HER2+ BCBM who received CNS radiation at Duke between 2006 and 2020 following initial documentation of CNS involvement. Demographics, dates of metastatic and intracranial diagnosis, ECD status at first CNS involvement, systemic therapy, and outcomes were collected. The primary endpoint was PFS1 defined as the time from first CNS radiation to the subsequent documentation of intracranial progression (RANO-BM). OS was defined as time from first CNS radiation and first metastatic disease to date of death or last known alive. ECD status was defined by RECIST1.1 from systemic staging scans within 30 days of first CNS involvement. Results: In this patient cohort of HER2+ BCBMs undergoing CNS radiation at first CNS involvement, >50% of patients had extracranial disease control: no ECD (25%) or stable/responding disease (31%). 52% of patients’ tumors were ER+. Median age was 50 years (range 27 – 75). Most patients (58%) developed first CNS involvement during adjuvant or first/second line metastatic therapy. For first CNS radiation, 49% received SRS and 48% WBRT. All patients with no ECD presented with isolated CNS disease as first metastatic presentation. Median OS in this cohort from initial metastatic disease to death was markedly worse for patients with no ECD (25.3m, 95% CI: 16.8 to 35.3) compared to those with progressive or stable/responding ECD (48.8m, 95% CI: 28.1 to 65; and 52.9 months, 95% CI: 43.7 to 73.3, respectively; p=0.03). Median OS from first CNS involvement to death was not statistically different amongst groups. This analysis did not detect median PFS1 differences based on ECD after first CNS radiation: progressive ECD (6.3m), no ECD (8.7m), or stable/responding ECD (10.6m) (p=0.13), though clinically meaningful differences were observed. Conclusions: Patients with isolated HER2+ BCBM with no ECD at the time of their initial CNS involvement (25% of population) have substantially worse OS compared to patients who present with ECD and develop CNS metastases later in their disease course. This population with isolated CNS disease at metastatic presentation deserves investigation of novel treatment algorithms, including earlier introduction of brain penetrable HER2-targeted agents.

BACKGROUND Recurrent medulloblastoma and malignant glioma are lethal tumors that are virtually incurable. The cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigen pp65 is ubiquitously expressed on medulloblastoma and malignant glioma but not on healthy brain. We evaluated autologous CMV pp65 RNA-pulsed dendritic cell (DC) vaccines in children and young adults in a phase I trial. METHODS Circulating monocytes were harvested using leukapheresis, differentiated into DCs, matured, and pulsed with pp65 RNA using electroporation. DCs were packaged into vaccines (2x107DC/vaccine) and administered intradermally following tetanus-diphtheria toxoid site preconditioning every 2 weeks x3, then monthly. The primary objectives of the study were to establish the feasibility of generating at least 3 vaccines and safety. An exploratory objective was to evaluate the ability of vaccination to create and enhance patient pp65-specific T cell responses. RESULTS Eleven patients were enrolled with medulloblastoma (n=3) or glioblastoma (n=8). Ages ranged from 9–30 years old (mean 15.5y). Ten of 11 patients (91%) generated at least 3 vaccines (mean 6.2). Eight patients received at least 3 vaccines. To date, 4 patients have received all generated vaccines without progression, 4 patients have progressed, and 2 patients are still receiving vaccines. There have not been any severe adverse events probably or definitely related to vaccines. More mature data will be presented at ISPNO. CONCLUSIONS Leukapheresis and monocyte differentiation is a feasible strategy for generating adequate DCs for active immunization in children with malignant brain tumors. CMV pp65 RNA-pulsed DCs are well-tolerated and immunogenic. Efficacy endpoints will be evaluated in a subsequent phase II trial.

INTRODUCTION Malignant glioma (MG) patients often experience chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Olanzapine has recently been added to national anti-emesis guidelines for patients on moderately/highly emetogenic chemotherapy. In this retrospective study, we investigated the use of olanzapine for refractory-CINV (R-CINV) in MG patients. METHODS In this chart review, we queried adult MG patients with KPS ≥ 70 who received olanzapine from January 2019-March 2020. Patients were included if they were prescribed olanzapine for CINV. Data on nausea/vomiting improvement, olanzapine dosing/schedule, number of refractory anti-emetic trials, concomitant corticosteroid use, and demographics were collected. RESULTS We identified 21 MG patients who were prescribed olanzapine, with 9 of those patients receiving olanzapine specifically for CINV. Seven patients had WHO grade IV glioma, and 2 patients had anaplastic astrocytoma (WHO grade III). Five of 9 patients (55.6%) were male, all were Caucasian and median age was 54 years. Patients tried an average of 3 anti-emetics prior to initiating olanzapine for R-CINV. Only one patient was taking concomitant corticosteroids; which is not in concordance with national anti-emesis guidelines. Four of 9 patients (44.4%) achieved control of R-CINV with olanzapine. The olanzapine dose and key biomarkers (IDH-status, MGMT promoter methylation) were similar between those experiencing R-CINV and those without symptoms. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we find that approximately half of patients with R-CINV achieved improved nausea and vomiting control with the addition of olanzapine. The lack of corticosteroid use for anti-emesis in MG continues to make this population challenging to manage. The relatively high success rate in patients that had failed, on average, 3 anti-emetics, suggests that olanzapine may be a potent addition to the anti-emetic toolkit for MG patients. These results inspire further large-scale research to validate this observation and define the optimal role for olanzapine in treating R-CINV in MG patients.

BACKGROUND D2C7 immunotoxin (D2C7-IT) is a dual-specific recombinant immunotoxin comprising an EGFR-wt and mutant-specific (EGFRvIII) monoclonal antibody fragment and a genetically engineered form of the pseudomonas exotoxin. When injected directly into the tumor mass by convection enhanced delivery (CED), in addition to direct tumor cell killing, immunotoxins induce secondary immune responses by the activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells. We completed a phase 1 dose escalation study of D2C7-IT injected by CED into recurrent WHO grade III-IV MG and identified the phase 2 dose (6,920 ng/mL). Three patients remain in partial response more than 58, 38, and 32 months after a single D2C7-IT intratumoral infusion. As optimal induction of anti-tumor immune responses by immunotoxins is impeded by potent MG-mediated immunosuppression, we are assessing the toxicity of the combination of D2C7-IT with atezolizumab in patients with recurrent WHO grade IV MG. METHODS Eligibility includes adult patients with recurrence of a solitary supratentorial WHO grade IV MG; ≥4 weeks after chemotherapy, bevacizumab or study drug; adequate organ function; and KPS >70%. Patient receives an intratumoral infusion of D2C7-IT and initiates two weeks later atezolizumab at 1200mg, followed by atezolizumab every 3 weeks for up to 2 years. Two cohorts of 3 patients are initially accrued to assess the toxicity of the combination. Assuming accrual continues after the initial two cohorts of 3 patients, an additional 12 patients will be accrued to the study. RESULT The first enrolled patient experienced a grade 3 DLT (grade III ALT elevation) after the first infusion of atezolizumab, but showed a more extensive immunotherapeutic effect by imaging than observed with patients on the D2C7-IT monotherapy trial. Enrollment is ongoing. CONCLUSION D2C7-IT monotherapy has shown prolonged survival and disease control in some patients. We are now evaluating the combination of D2C7-IT with checkpoint inhibition.

BACKGROUND Primary brain tumor patients experience high levels of distress due to their diagnosis and treatment leading to changes in their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Even with the standard treatment of 6 weeks of radiation with concurrent temozolomide for malignant gliomas, the prognosis remains poor. We sought to provide a new intervention and coping skill for our patients during chemoradiation to alleviate some of their stress and anxiety. Mindfulness meditation is a mind-body therapy used in many other cancer groups which can alleviate stress and improve fatigue, cognition, and sleep. METHODS 15 newly diagnosed malignant glioma subjects started 1-hour weekly phone mindfulness sessions during the 6 weeks of chemoradiation. They completed an in-person mindfulness session and interview upon return to the clinic with a final follow up survey 2 months later. Patient reported outcomes questionnaires were collected at each time point. RESULTS 0/15 subjects completed their post-chemo/in-person visit, and 9 completed their final follow-up surveys 2 months later. Scores for perceived cognition, fatigue, sleep, anxiety, spiritual-well being and mindfulness improved over these time points. Completed HRQoL patient-reported outcome questionnaires with positive trends noted from the mean (SD) post-chemo/in-person visit change from baseline and the follow-up change from baseline were: FACT-Cog perceived Cognitive Impairments subscale 4.11(13.55), 9.14(16.77); FACT-G total -5.48(16.02), 7.02(13.44); FACT-Br total -3.15(24.76), 13.17(23.37); FACIT-F -5(7.68), 0(7.92); and the FACIT-Sp12 -1.38(7.6), 2.17(4.88). Trail making Part A completion times from baseline to follow up decreased over time in 8/9 subjects and 7/9 subjects in Part B. Per the final follow up survey, 7/9 subjects continued their meditation practices after the training sessions and subjectively noted benefits with their stress and anxiety. Conclusion: Despite this small sample size, this mindfulness meditation intervention did positively impact patient-report outcomes of HRQoL in this patient population, thereby larger randomized studies are warranted.

INTRODUCTION The cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigen, pp65, is ubiquitously expressed in malignant glioma and medulloblastoma but not in healthy brain. The objective of this Phase I trial (NCT03299309) was to assess the safety and feasibility of a novel pp65 peptide vaccine (PEP-CMV) in children and young adults with recurrent medulloblastoma and malignant glioma. METHODS Vaccines contain a synthetic long peptide (SLP) of 26 amino acids encoding multiple potential class I, class II, and antibody epitopes of CMV pp65 across several haplotypes. This SLP is administered as an emulsion in Montanide ISA 51. Patients receive a single course of temozolomide to induce lymphopenia, tetanus/diphtheria toxoid site preconditioning, then vaccines administered intradermally every two weeks for 3 doses, then monthly. RESULTS To date, 17 patients have been enrolled. Diagnoses include medulloblastoma (n=1), glioblastoma (n=9), anaplastic oligodendroglioma (n=2), anaplastic astrocytoma (n=2), and malignant glioma NOS (n=3). Mean number of prior treatment regimens is 4.9 (range 1–12). Mean age is 22yo (range 6–35) and 41% of patients are male. The median KPS is 80. The median number of vaccines given at time of analysis is 3.3 (range 1–12). There have been no ≥ 3 Grade toxicities related to the vaccine. One patient developed nausea, vomiting, palpitations, and tachycardia after vaccination and had elevated inflammatory cytokines consistent with cytokine release syndrome. Median PFS is 2.5 months (95% CI: 0.8, not estimable) and median OS is 6.5 months (95% CI 1.8, not estimable). Interim analysis of immune monitoring bloodwork and perfusion MRI to quantify responses to PEP-CMV has been delayed due to COVID-19. However, adults with GBM who received PEP-CMV (NCT02864368) had significant (p≤0.05) increases in GCSF, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-2, IL-8, MIP1-α, and TNF-α levels. CONCLUSIONS Preliminary results demonstrate that PEP-CMV is feasible and well-tolerated in heavily pretreated, multiply recurrent patients.

TPS2577 Background: Patients diagnosed with malignant high-grade gliomas (WHO grade III-IV) experience significant morbidity and mortality associated with these cancers. While the mainstay of therapy for patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma is surgery followed by concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT), the outcomes remain very poor. BMX-001 (MnTnBuOE-2-PyP5+) is a metalloporphyrin with differential action in response to radiation therapy and chemotherapy-induced oxidative stress. Early preclinical studies demonstrated BMX-001’s ability to act as a radioprotectant to healthy tissue such as a central nervous white matter and as a radiosensitizer to cancer cells, in particular, human glioblastoma xenografts. We evaluated the safety of BMX-001 in combination with concurrent RT and temozolomide (TMZ) in a phase I study of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma patients, and we found that BMX-001 is safe and well-tolerated in this population. The maximum tolerated dose of BMX-001 during concurrent RT and TMZ was determined to be 28 mg delivered subcutaneously (SC) followed by 16 biweekly SC doses at 14 mg (Peters et al., Neuro-Oncology 2018). Methods: For this multi-site, open-label, phase II study (NCT02655601), we will randomize approximately 160 patients 1:1 to concurrent RT and TMZ with BMX-001 versus concurrent RT and TMZ alone. Key eligibility criteria include newly diagnosed histologically confirmed high-grade glioma (WHO III-IV), 18 ≥ years, and Karnofsky performance status ≥ 70%. The primary endpoint is overall survival. Secondary endpoints include cognitive performance as assessed by standardized cognitive testing, bone marrow protection, safety and tolerability, progression-free survival, overall tumor response rate, and plasma pharmacokinetics. Exploratory endpoints are health-related quality of life (as assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Brain, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognition, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue), qualitative hair loss, and white matter integrity (as measured by MRI diffusion tensor/susceptibility imaging). Since November 2018, this phase II study has enrolled 64 of 160 high-grade glioma patients at six sites with future sites planned to be implemented. Clinical trial information: NCT02655601 .

2566 Background: D2C7-IT is a recombinant immunotoxin comprised of a dual-specific antibody fragment targeting EGFRwt and EGFRvIII and a genetically engineered form of the Pseudomonas exotoxin, PE38-KDEL. We report the results of a phase I trial evaluating D2C7-IT delivered intratumorally by CED. Methods: Eligible patients were adults with recurrent supratentorial WHO grade III or IV MG; solitary tumor; ≥4 weeks after chemotherapy, bevacizumab or study drug; adequate organ function; and KPS>70%. Two patients per dose level (DL) were to enroll in the dose escalation portion (dose range: 40ng/mL to 23,354ng/mL). Results: From May 2015 to May 2018, 43 patients enrolled on study. Observed dose limiting toxicities include: grade 4 seizure (n=1) on DL3, grade 3 confusion and pyramidal tract syndrome (n=1) on DL13, and grade 4 cerebral edema (n=1) and grade 3 dysphasia (n=1) on DL17. Grade 3 or higher adverse events possibly related to D2C7-IT include: seizure (grade 4, n=2; grade 3, n=3), cerebral edema (grade 4, n=1), hydrocephalus (grade 3, n=5), headache (grade 3, n=4), hemiparesis (grade 3, n=4), dysphasia (grade 3, n=3), lymphopenia (grade 3, n=4), thromboembolic event (grade 3, n=3); and one each of grade 3 elevated ALT, urinary tract infection, fall, wound complication, generalized muscle weakness, confusion, encephalopathy, and somnolence. As of February 2020, four patients remain alive, with three patients demonstrating persistent radiographic partial response more than 54, 34 and 28 months after a single infusion of D2C7-IT. Conclusions: Dose level 13 (6,920ng/mL) was selected as the optimal phase II dose. Accrual in a dose expansion phase II trial is ongoing, and we are initiating a combination trial of D2C7-IT with checkpoint inhibitior. Clinical trial information: NCT02303678 .

INTRODUCTION: Meningiomas, the most common CNS neoplasm, are often deemed less threatening than their glial counterparts. Unfortunately, these tumors recur and necessitate surgery, radiation, and/or systemic treatment. We explored the psychosocial distress of patients with recurrent meningioma using The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer (NCCN-DT) and Problem List. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with recurrent meningioma seen at the Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center between 12/31/2004–10/10/2018 who completed a NCCN-DT and Problem List. The first or only NCCN-DT assessment after initial recurrence was used for analysis with a score of 4 indicating moderate to severe distress. RESULTS: 45 patients were identified, 56% female, median age was 61 years and 58% had unifocal disease. 60% were Grade 1, 33% Grade II, 4% Grade III, and 2% indeterminate recurrent meningioma. The median NCCN-DT score was 3, and 49% had a NCCN-DT score 4 indicating moderate to severe distress. 64% of females vs 30% of males reported distress scores 4 (p=0.04). 65% of patients with unifocal disease reported 4 scores compared to 26% with multifocal disease (p=0.02). Fatigue (N=24), Worry (N=23), Nervousness (N=22), Depression (N=19) and Memory/Concentration (N=19) were the most commonly reported problems. A higher incidence of worry among females (64%) than males (35%) was the only problem showing a trend towards significance (p=0.08). Between initial recurrence and NCCN assessment, the type and number of treatments patients received included: surgery (median=1, range 0–5), radiation (median=2, range 0–5), systemic treatment (median=2, range 0–12). There was no association between distress and the number of surgeries (p=0.99), radiation treatments (p=0.49) or systemic therapies (p=0.87). CONCLUSIONS: In our study population, nearly half of recurrent meningioma patients reported moderate to severe distress. Therefore, even in this benign tumor population, the NCCN-DT and problem list should be administered at every clinic visit.

BACKGROUND: D2C7-IT is a recombinant immunotoxin comprised of a dual-specific antibody fragment targeting EGFRwt and EGFRvIII and a genetically engineered form of the Pseudomonas exotoxin, PE38-KDEL. We report results of a phase 1 trial evaluating D2C7-IT delivered intratumorally by CED. METHODS: Eligible patients are adults with recurrent supratentorial WHO grade III or IV MG; solitary tumor; ≥4 weeks after chemotherapy, bevacizumab or study drug; adequate organ function; and KPS>70%. Planned enrollment of two patients per dose level (DL). RESULTS: As of 5/29/2018, 43 patients have been treated (2 each per DL, but for DLs 3, 6, 9, and 16). Observed dose limiting toxicities include: grade 4 seizure (n=1) on DL3, grade 3 confusion and pyramidal tract syndrome (n=1) on DL13, and grade 4 cerebral edema and grade 3 dysphasia (n=2) on DL17. Grade 2 or higher adverse events possibly related to D2C7-IT include: seizure (grade 4, n=2, grade 3, n=2, grade 2, n=4), cerebral edema (grade 4, n=1), headache (grade 3, n=4; grade 2, n=18), hemiparesis (grade 3, n=4, grade 2, n=10), dysphasia (grade 3, n=2; grade 2, n=9), confusion (grade 3, n=1; grade 2, n=5), thromboembolic event (grade 3, n=2; grade 2, n=1), fatigue (grade 2, n=6), visual field cut (grade 2, n=3), paresthesia (grade 2, n=2), stroke (grade 2, n=2), and hemineglect (grade 2, n=2); one each of grade 3 elevated ALT, urinary tract infection, fall, generalized muscle weakness, encephalopathy, and somnolence; one each of grade 2 elevated AST, papilledema, gait disturbance, intracranial hemorrhage, and urinary incontinence. Fifteen patients are alive. Two patients have partial response and are alive ≥8.2 months and ≥34 months after infusion. CONCLUSION: DL17 is above the maximal tolerated dose. Encouraging efficacy results were observed. After review of efficacy and safety data, DL13 seems the optimal dose, additional patients will be treated on DL13.

Two of our previous clinical trials targeting Cytomegalovirus (CMV) protein pp65 in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) using pp65-specific dendritic cell (DC) vaccines have yielded long term survival rates greatly exceeding those predicted with standard of care. In the ATTAC trial (IND 12839), patients received sequential DC vaccination throughout monthly cycles of standard temozolomide (STD-TMZ) 200mg/m(2)/d for 5d and were randomized to one of two vaccine site preconditioning regimens. Significantly higher rates of DC migration (p=0.04) and survival (p=0.013) were observed in patients randomized to tetanus preconditioning, with half of the cohort living to nearly five years after diagnosis. In the ATTAC-GM trial, we treated a subsequent cohort with dose-intensified TMZ (DI-TMZ) 100mg/m(2)/d for 21d prior to and throughout vaccination with GM-CSF-containing DC vaccines and observed extraordinarily prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (median 25.3 and 41.1 months, respectively). In this trial, DI-TMZ-induced lymphopenia facilitated homeostatic expansion of pp65 responses after an initial DI-TMZ cycle but later ablated T cell responses when monthly cycles were reintroduced. The benefit of DI-TMZ thus warrants further study in a larger series of patients. Here we describe the initiation of a validation trial, “I-ATTAC: Improved Anti-Tumor Immunotherapy Targeted Against Cytomegalovirus in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed WHO Grade IV Unmethylated Glioma” (IND-16301). This prospective single arm Phase 2 trial of 48 patients will validate our findings that tetanus preconditioning and GM-CSF in conjunction with pp65-DCs extends OS in patients with newly diagnosed, unmethylated GBM. By withholding additional TMZ cycles in this patient population, we hypothesize that CMV immune responses will not be abrogated as previously observed, and that this greater expansion will translate into further prolonged survival (primary objective). A series of secondary objectives will be evaluated for the association between increased DC migration, systemic mediators of tetanus preconditioning, and T cell polyfunctionality with survival.

We performed a phase I study to assess feasibility, safety, and efficacy of ALT+DCV following HDC +ASCR (group A) or NMAC (group B) in pts with r-PNET. METHODS: Eligible pts underwent surgery to confirm diagnosis and obtain tumor for vaccine preparation. Pts with local (group A) or metastatic (group B) recurrence received 4 cycles of cytoreductive chemotherapy prior to either MAC (carboplatin + thiotepa + etoposide) (group A) or NMAC (cyclophosphamide + Fludarabine) (group B). Two dose levels of ALT were evaluated [3 x 10(6) or 3 x 10(7) cells/kg] with 3 intradermal biweekly DCVs (10(7)cells each). Safety evaluation for DLT assessment was 2 weeks past third DCV with monthly vaccines thereafter as available. Correlative studies for immune response included TCR sequencing and measurement of serum cytokines RESULTS: Ten pts (M5; F5) were treated on protocol (group A 1, group B 9). Nine evaluable pts received immunotherapy; DCV [median 3 doses (3-9)] + ALT [3 x10(6)/kg (n=4) or 3 x 10(7)/kg (n=5)]. There were no DLTs observed. At median of 21 months follow-up, 3 pts are alive with (n=2) or without (n=1) disease 33-42 months following treatment. TCR RNA sequencing demonstrates massive clonal expansion of T cells following ALT+DCV and positive correlation with clinical outcomes. Persistence of tumor-reactive (IFN-gamma secreting) T cell clones in the peripheral blood was observed 4 months after treatment in a patient with long-term disease control. CONCLUSIONS: ALT+DCV is feasible, safe, and shows signs of biologic and clinical activity in some pts with r-PNET.

BACKGROUND: Prognosis of recurrent World Health Organization (WHO) grade IV malignant glioma (GBM) in children is dismal with no effective therapy. We have recently performed a dose-finding and toxicity study within adults with GBM, evaluating the recombinant non-pathogenic polio/rhinovirus chimera (PVSRIPO) by intratumoral convection-enhanced delivery (CED). PVSRIPO recognizes the poliovirus receptor CD155, which is widely expressed in neoplastic cells of solid tumors and in major components of tumor stroma. We have commenced a Phase Ib study to evaluate feasibility, safety, and preliminary evidence of efficacy of the optimal adult dose in a pediatric population. METHODS: Patients with a recurrent supratentorial WHO Grade III malignant glioma (anaplastic astrocytoma, anaplastic oligoastrocytoma, anaplastic oligodendroglioma, anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, ependymoma) or WHO Grade IV malignant glioma (glioblastoma, gliosarcoma) based on imaging studies with measurable disease (≥ 1 cm and ≤ 5.5 cm of contrast-enhancing tumor) will be enrolled. A stereotactic biopsy will be performed prior to virus administration. Immediately following the stereotactically-guided tumor biopsy, a catheter will be implanted in the operating room. PVSRIPO will then be delivered intratumorally by CED, using the catheter placed within the enhancing portion of the tumor, at a dose of 5 x 10(7) TCID over 6.5 hours. CONCLUSION: We will confirm the activity of intratumoral PVSRIPO infusion in recurrent WHO grade III or IV malignant glioma in the absence of neurovirulent potential in children.