Search

Background HER2 alteration (mutation and/or amplification) is associated with poor survival in NSCLC and can mediate resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Methods We retrospectively analyzed de-identified molecular information from 12,946 NSCLC samples that underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) with Caris Life Sciences. The objectives were to determine the prevalence and type of HER2 alterations with and without EGFR as a co-mutation. Insurance claims were utilized to obtain outcomes data. Results Three hundred and twenty-one patients (2.5%) had HER2 alteration: mutation in 197 patients and amplification in 134. Median age was 65 years and 62% were female. A total of 84% were adenocarcinoma. HER2 exon 20 insertion was most common (69%). A total of 1551 (12%) patients had EGFR mutations. Among samples with EGFR mutations, 24 (1.5%) had concurrent HER2 alteration (8 with HER2 mutation and 16 with amplification). Among 8 patients who had both EGFR and HER2 mutations, 3 had EGFR exon 19 deletions and exon 8 HER2 mutation (S310F). One-third of the patients (7/21) with HER2 extracellular domain (ECD) mutation had co-occurring EGFR mutations. All 7 were S310. Patients with concurrent EGFR mutation and HER2 amplification had longer median time on treatment with EGFR TKI(s) than those with EGFR mutation without HER2 amplification (HR 2.284, P =.004). Conclusion A minority of NSCLC samples with EGFR mutations had HER2 alterations. In patients with both mutations, exon 21 mutations for EGFR and exon 8 mutations for HER2 were common. It will be critical to continue to accumulate valuable clinical data for further real-world outcomes analysis.

International audience; Cholangiocarcinoma is a deadly cancer comprising very heterogenous subtypes with a limited therapeutic arsenal in all comers. However, recent significant advances were made with immunotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma, with the addition of durvalumab to cisplatin–gemcitabine chemotherapy showing a survival benefit. In the second line setting, only FOLFOX (5FU/folinic acid-oxaliplatin) is validated by a phase 3 trial, yet with a very modest benefit on survival; new options using 5FU with nanoliposomal-irinotecan may emerge in the next few years. The advent of molecular profiling in advanced cholangiocarcinoma in the last decade revealed frequent targetable alterations such as IDH1 mutations, FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, HER2 amplification, BRAF V600E mutation and others. This strategy opened the way to personalised medicine for patients which are still fit after first-line treatment and the use of targeted inhibitors in first line constitutes a huge challenge with many ongoing trials to improve patients’ care. This review exposes the recent clinical trial findings in non-molecularly selected advanced cholangiocarcinoma, offers a focus on how systematic molecular screening should be structured to allow patients to access to personalised medicine, and details which are the therapeutic options accessible in case of actionable alteration.

Breast cancer that is characterized by amplification or over expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) accounts for 15% to 20% of all forms of the disease. Although HER2 amplification has been associated with aggressive disease behavior and poor prognosis, the development and availability of a number of HER2-targeted agents has led to improved outcomes for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, with data suggesting that overall survival has substantially improved in the past 2 decades. An increasing proportion of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer is diagnosed as de novo stage IV disease. Patients with de novo metastases are traditionally classified in the general category of metastatic breast cancer and not analyzed as a distinct subgroup, though response to therapy and disease outcomes may differ from that of disease that recurred after early stage disease. Among patients with HER2+ de novo metastatic breast cancer, those who achieve a complete response have a prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival. Moreover, the fact that some patients achieve a prolonged durable response has raised interest and renewed discussion about whether cure is feasible in the complex context of metastatic breast cancer. In this review, available data associated with the possibility of cure in the population of patients with HER2+ de novo metastatic breast cancer are presented and discussed in detail.

Amplicon-based next generation sequencing (NGS) approaches have been preferentially adopted by the clinical laboratories on the basis of a short turnaround time (TAT) and small DNA input needs. However, little work has been done to assess the amplicon-based NGS methods for copy number variation (CNV) detection in comparison with current standard methods like immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The correlation between NGS based CNV detection and the later standard methods has remained unexplored. We developed an amplicon-based panel to detect human epidermal receptor growth factor (HER2) amplification in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue samples from 280 breast cancer and 50 gastric cancer patients. Assessment by IHC and FISH was conducted in parallel, and descriptive statistics were used to assess the concordance. The copy number detected by NGS was correlated with either the average HER2 copy number (signals/cell) (r = 0.844; p

Intratumour heterogeneity fuels carcinogenesis and allows circumventing specific targeted therapies. HER2 gene amplification is associated with poor outcome in invasive breast cancer. Heterogeneous HER2 amplification has been described in 5–41% of breast cancers. Here, we investigated the genetic differences between HER2‐positive and HER2‐negative admixed breast cancer components. We performed an in‐depth analysis to explore the potential heterogeneity in the somatic mutational landscape of each individual tumour component. Formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded breast cancer tissue of ten patients with at least one HER2‐negative and at least one HER2‐positive component was microdissected. Targeted next‐generation sequencing was performed using a customized 53‐gene panel. Somatic mutations and copy number variations were analysed. Overall, the tumours showed a heterogeneous distribution of 12 deletions, 9 insertions, 32 missense variants and 7 nonsense variants in 26 different genes, which are (likely) pathogenic. Three splice site alterations were identified. One patient had an EGFR copy number gain restricted to a HER2‐negative in situ component, resulting in EGFR protein overexpression. Two patients had FGFR1 copy number gains in at least one tumour component. Two patients had an 8q24 gain in at least one tumour component, resulting in a copy number increase in MYC and PVT1. One patient had a CCND1 copy number gain restricted to a HER2‐negative tumour component. No common alternative drivers were identified in the HER2‐negative tumour components. This series of 10 breast cancers with heterogeneous HER2 gene amplification illustrates that HER2 positivity is not an unconditional prerequisite for the maintenance of tumour growth. Many other molecular aberrations are likely to act as alternative or collaborative drivers. This study demonstrates that breast carcinogenesis is a dynamically evolving process characterized by a versatile somatic mutational profile, of which some genetic aberrations will be crucial for cancer progression, and others will be mere ‘passenger’ molecular anomalies., This in‐depth analysis of 10 breast cancers with heterogeneous HER2 gene amplification illustrates that HER2 positivity is not an unconditional prerequisite for the maintenance of tumour growth. This study demonstrates that breast carcinogenesis is a dynamically evolving process characterized by a versatile somatic mutational profile: some genetic aberrations will be crucial for cancer progression, and others will be mere ‘passenger’ molecular anomalies.

Overexpression of HER2 in breast cancer is an important prognostic and predictive biomarker, assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH). More than 20% of tumours are graded equivocal on IHC and is send for reflex testing via ISH. In situ hybridization (ISH) is an expensive assay and is not available widely in resource limiting areas. Therefore, we propose that genes found significantly co-expressed with HER2 in breast cancer can be used as surrogate markers for HER2 in breast cancer which can detect HER2 positivity on IHC itself. This hypothesis is based on analysis of publicly available datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The genes found most significantly correlated with HER2 expression were PGAP3 (r = 0.85), GRB7 (r = 0.82), STARD3 (r = 0.78), CDK12 (r= 0.68), PSMD3 (r =0.67) and GSDMB (r = 0.63). We hypothesize that these identified surrogate markers for HER2 amplification which can be detected on IHC can detect HER2 amplification status in HER2 equivocal tumors based on IHC staining alone and will reduce the number of HER2 2+ (equivocal) category tumours.

Purpose of review This review aims to introduce the resistance mechanisms to osimertinib, discuss the therapeutic strategies, and make clinical updates in overcoming resistance to osimertinib. Recent findings Osimertinib has shown favorable efficacy on second-line and first-line treatments in EGFR-mutant advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the presence of primary and acquired resistance to osimertinib restricts its clinical benefits. The primary resistance mainly consists of BIM deletion polymorphism and EGFR exon 20 insertions. Meanwhile, the heterogeneous mechanisms of acquired resistance include EGFR-dependent (on-target) and EGFR-independent (off-target) mechanisms. EGFR C797S mutation, MET amplification, HER2 amplification, and small cell lung cancer transformation were identified as frequent resistance mechanisms. Recently, more novel mechanisms, including rare EGFR point mutations and oncogenic fusions, were reported. With the results of completed and on-going clinical trials, the emerging therapeutic strategies of postosimertinib progression are summarized. Summary The resistance mechanisms to osimertinib are heterogeneous and gradually perfected. The combination of osimertinib with bypass targeted therapy and other therapeutic approaches emerge as promising strategies.

Protein tyrosine kinases of the human epidermal growth factor receptor family, including EGFR and HER2, have emerged as important therapeutic targets in non-small-cell lung, breast and gastroesophageal cancers, and are of relevance for the treatment of various other malignancies (particularly colorectal cancer). Classic activating EGFR exon 19 deletions and exon 21 mutations, and HER2 amplification and/or overexpression, are predictive of response to matched molecularly targeted therapies, translating into favourable objective response rates and survival outcomes. By comparison, cancers with insertion mutations in exon 20 of either EGFR or HER2 are considerably less sensitive to the currently available tyrosine kinase inhibitors and antibodies targeting these receptors. These exon 20 insertions are structurally distinct from other EGFR and HER2 mutations, providing an explanation for this lack of sensitivity. In this Review, we first discuss the prevalence and pan-cancer distribution of EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertions, their biology and detection, and associated responses to current molecularly targeted therapies and immunotherapies. We then focus on novel approaches that are being developed to more effectively target tumours driven by these non-classic EGFR and HER2 alterations. EGFR exon 19 deletions and exon 21 mutations, and HER2 amplification and/or overexpression, are predictive of response to matched molecularly targeted therapies that have greatly improved patient outcomes. However, insertion mutations in exon 20 of either EGFR or HER2 generally do not confer sensitivity to these therapies. In this Review, the authors discuss the prevalence of EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertions across cancers, their biology and detection, and associated responses to current molecularly targeted therapies and immunotherapies. In addition, they focus on new therapeutic strategies that are being developed to target tumours driven by these non-classic EGFR and HER2 alterations.

Background Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification occurs in approximately 13–23% of all GC cases and patients with HER2 overexpression exhibit a poor prognosis. Lapatinib, a dual EGFR/HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is an effective agent to treat HER2-amplified breast cancer but it failed in gastric cancer (GC) clinical trials. However, the molecular mechanism of lapatinib resistance in HER2-amplified GC is not well studied. Methods We employed an unbiased, genome-scale screening with pooled CRISPR library on HER2-amplified GC cell lines to identify genes that are associated with resistance to lapatinib. To validate the candidate genes, we applied in vitro and in vivo pharmacological tests to confirm the function of the target genes. Results We found that loss of function of CSK or PTEN conferred lapatinib resistance in HER2-amplified GC cell lines NCI-N87 and OE19, respectively. Moreover, PI3K and MAPK signaling was significantly increased in CSK or PTEN null cells. Furthermore, in vitro and in vivo pharmacological study has shown that lapatinib resistance by the loss of function of CSK or PTEN, could be overcome by lapatinib combined with the PI3K inhibitor copanlisib and MEK inhibitor trametinib. Conclusions Our study suggests that loss-of-function mutations of CSK and PTEN cause lapatinib resistance by re-activating MAPK and PI3K pathways, and further proved these two pathways are druggable targets. Inhibiting the two pathways synergistically are effective to overcome lapatinib resistance in HER2-amplified GC. This study provides insights for understanding the resistant mechanism of HER2 targeted therapy and novel strategies that may ultimately overcome resistance or limited efficacy of lapatinib treatment for subset of HER2 amplified GC.

Simple Summary Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are likely to play a role in the biological behavior of HER2+ ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). To prevent invasiveness, the potential of targeted immune-modulating treatment of HER2+ DCIS has been explored. We identified a 29-gene expression profile that was associated with the density of TILs. These genes included CCND3, DUSP10 and RAP1GAP, which may guide towards more rationalized choices with respect to immune-mediated therapy in HER2+ DCIS, such as targeted vaccine therapy. Abstract The identification of transcriptomic alterations of HER2+ ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) that are associated with the density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) could contribute to optimizing choices regarding the potential benefit of immune therapy. We compared the gene expression profile of TIL-poor HER2+ DCIS to that of TIL-rich HER2+ DCIS. Tumor cells from 11 TIL-rich and 12 TIL-poor DCIS cases were micro-dissected for RNA isolation. The Ion AmpliSeq Transcriptome Human Gene Expression Kit was used for RNA sequencing. After normalization, a Mann–Whitney rank sum test was used to analyze differentially expressed genes between TIL-poor and TIL-rich HER2+ DCIS. Whole tissue sections were immunostained for validation of protein expression. We identified a 29-gene expression profile that differentiated TIL-rich from TIL-poor HER2+ DCIS. These genes included CCND3, DUSP10 and RAP1GAP, which were previously described in breast cancer and cancer immunity and were more highly expressed in TIL-rich DCIS. Using immunohistochemistry, we found lower protein expression in TIL-rich DCIS. This suggests regulation of protein expression at the posttranslational level. We identified a gene expression profile of HER2+ DCIS cells that was associated with the density of TILs. This classifier may guide towards more rationalized choices regarding immune-mediated therapy in HER2+ DCIS, such as targeted vaccine therapy.

Purpose HER2 amplification has been implicated in resistance to therapy with anti–epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies (anti-EGFRabs) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The purpose of the study was to validate the predictive impact of HER2 amplification in mCRC. Patients and Methods We analyzed patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC across two distinct cohorts. In cohort 1 (n = 98), HER2 amplification was tested in tumor tissue using dual in situ hybridization ( HER2 amplification: HER2/CEP17 ratio, 2.0 or greater). Cohort 2 (n = 70) included 16 patients with HER2 amplification and 54 HER2 nonamplified controls identified by next-generation sequencing ( HER2 amplification: four or more copies) who had received prior anti-EGFRabs. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) on treatment with anti-EGFRab therapy, which was estimated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results Median PFS in cohort 1 on anti-EGFRab–based therapy was significantly shorter in patients with HER2 amplification compared with HER2 nonamplified patients (2.8 v 8.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 7.05; 95% CI, 3.4 to 14.9; P < .001). These findings were validated in cohort 2 (median PFS for HER2 amplified v nonamplified: 2.8 v 9.3 months, respectively; HR, 10.66; 95% CI, 4.5 to 25.1; P < .001). The median PFS on therapy without anti-EGFRabs was similar among HER2-amplified and nonamplified patients in both cohort 1 (9.7 v 11.1 months, respectively; HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.4; P = .97) and cohort 2 (9.6 v 11.3 months, respectively; HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.5 to 3.1; P = .66). In multivariable analyses, HER2 amplification emerged as a single independent predictor of poor PFS on anti-EGFRab therapy in both cohort 1 (HR, 6.48; 95% CI, 3.1 to 13.6; P < .001) and cohort 2 (HR, 10.1; 95% CI, 4.3 to 23.9; P < .001). Conclusion HER2 amplification in RAS/RAF wild-type mCRC seems to be a predictive biomarker for lack of efficacy of anti-EGFRab therapy. Screening patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC for HER2 amplification should be considered before anti-EGFRab treatment to guide therapy and to identify patients for early referral to clinical trials.

Numerous inherent and acquired genetic alterations have been demonstrated with resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Although the common oncogenic driver mutations identified include KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PI3K, recent studies report a vital role played by human epithelial growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) amplification in acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. HER2 amplification has been associated with poor prognosis in many malignancies including breast and gastric cancer and is also a negative predictor of anti-EGFR therapy. Given the relevance of HER2 amplification in conferring an anti-EGFR resistance, this paper reviews the prevalence of HER2 amplification in mCRC while exploring the prognostic and predictive values of this biomarker. Further, we also discuss the results of the studies that explored the utilization of anti-HER2-targeted therapies in mCRC. HER2-directed therapies have the ability to change the treatment algorithm in clinically relevant small subset of patients with HER2-amplified mCRC.

Progression of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) to muscle-invasive disease (MIBC) significantly worsens life expectancy. Its risk can be assessed by clinicopathological factors according to international guidelines. However, additional molecular markers are needed to refine and improve the prediction. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to predict the progression of NMIBCs to MIBC by assessing p53 expression, polysomy of chromosome 17 (Chr17) and HER2 status in the tissue specimens of the tumors of 90 NMIBC patients. Median follow-up was 77 months (range 2–158). Patients with Chr17 polysomy or HER2 gene amplification had a higher rate of disease progression (hazard ratio: 7.44; p < 0.001 and 4.04; p = 0.033, respectively; univariate Cox regression). Multivariable Cox regression models demonstrated that the addition of either Chr17 polysomy or HER2 gene amplification status to the European Association of Urology (EAU) progression risk score increases the c-index (from 0.741/EAU/ to 0.793 and 0.755, respectively), indicating that Chr17 polysomy/HER2 amplification status information improves the accuracy of the EAU risk table in predicting disease progression. HER2/Chr17 in situ hybridization can be used to select non-progressive cases not requiring strict follow-up, by reclassifying non-HER2-amplified, non-polysomic NMIBCs from the high- and very high-risk groups of EAU to the intermediate-risk group.

BackgroundNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with HER2 mutations and amplification may benefit from HER2-targeted therapy, including afatinib. However, the data regarding the clinical activity of afatinib in Chinese patients with NSCLC harboring HER2 alterations are limited.Patients and methodsWe retrospectively included metastatic NSCLC patients harboring HER2 alterations who treated with afatinib. The clinical outcomes included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The genomic profiling data after progression on afatinib were analyzed.ResultsWe included 54 patients harboring HER2 mutations and 12 patients harboring HER2 amplification. The ORR was 24% (95% CI, 16–36%), the median PFS was 3.3 months (95% CI, 2.2–4.4), and the median OS was 13.9 months (95% CI, 11.4–16.5). Patients with HER2 exon 20 mutations had numerically worse ORR (17% vs 42%), shorter PFS (2.6 vs 5.8 months, HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2–5.5; P = 0.015) and OS (12.9 vs 33.3 months, HR, 4.4; 95% CI, 1.3–14.8; P = 0.009) than patients with other mutations. For HER2-amplified patients, the ORR was 33% (95% CI, 14–61%), the median PFS was 3.3 months (95% CI, 2.6–4.0), and the median OS was 13.4 months (95% CI, 0–27.6). The most frequently mutated genes in afatinib-resistant patients were TP53 (44%) and EGFR (33%). Three afatinib-resistant patients harbored secondary HER2 alterations.ConclusionsOur results suggest that afatinib has a promising anti-tumor activity in patients with NSCLC harboring HER2 alterations. To our knowledge, this is the largest retrospective study about the clinical activity of afatinib in NSCLC patients with HER2 alterations.

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring HER2 alterations is now considered a distinct molecular subtype. The activation of HER2 in NSCLC occurs via three mechanisms, i.e. gene mutation (1%-4% of cases), gene amplification (2%-5%) and protein overexpression (2%-30%), with different prognostic and predictive outcomes. So far, non-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown a minor benefit in HER2-mutant NSCLC patients with objective response rates (ORRs) ranging from 0% to 19%. Trastuzumab-based chemotherapy was not found to be superior to chemotherapy alone [median progression-free survival (PFS) 6.1 versus 7 months, respectively] and dual HER2 antibody blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab had limited efficacy (ORR 13%-21%). In contrast, novel more selective HER2 TKIs such as poziotinib and pyrotinib have shown a promising activity in HER2-mutant pre-treated NSCLC patients, with response rates up to 38% and 44%, respectively. The most encouraging data come from phase II studies that evaluated the antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) ado-trastuzumab–emtansine and trastuzumab–deruxtecan in patients with HER2-mutant NSCLC, with response rates of 50% and 62%, respectively. These agents are bringing hope to the management of HER2-altered NSCLC. Moreover, a paradigm shift from monotherapies towards combinations of agents with distinct mechanisms of action, such as ADCs with irreversible TKIs or immune checkpoint inhibitors, is already taking place and will change the therapeutic landscape of HER2-driven NSCLC. This paper provides a practical, concise and updated review on the therapeutic strategies in NSCLC with HER2 molecular alterations., Highlights • Activation of Her2 in NSCLC occurs via gene mutation, amplification or protein overexpression. • Selective Her2 TKIs like poziotinib and pyrotinib induced responses in up to 44% of pre-treated Her2-mutant NSCLC patients. • ADCs trastuzumab–emtansine and trastuzumab–deruxtecan showed impressive response rates in 62% of Her2-mutant NSCLC patients. • Ongoing studies evaluating combination strategies may help improve the therapeutic landscape in Her2-dependent NSCLC.

Clinical Practice Points • HER2 amplification is an acquired resistance mechanism in ALK-rearranged non–small cell lung cancer. • FISH analysis revealed a minor subclone of HER2-amplified cells before becoming the dominant resistance mechanism. • Combination of HER2 and ALK therapies may be an effective treatment approach for ALK-rearranged NSCLC with acquired HER2 amplification.

Clinical epigenetics 13(1), 184 (2021). doi:10.1186/s13148-021-01176-5, Published by BioMed Central, [S.l.]

Dual HER2-targeted therapy has been associated with clinical responses and prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival in RAS-wild type HER2-amplified colorectal cancer (CRC). However, no clinical benefits have been reported in patients with CRC with HER2 mutations. Activated HER2 mutations have been largely deemed resistant to trastuzumab and to dual HER2 targeting. This report describes a patient with metastatic CRC with concurrent HER2 amplification and a HER2 S310F mutation, which is an active mutation located in the extracellular dimerization domain of HER2. Treatment with trastuzumab + lapatinib resulted in an excellent response that lasted for 10 months. Upon disease progression, treatment with the antibody–drug conjugate trastuzumab–deruxtecan resulted in a short-lived response. This is the first case report of successful HER2 targeting in metastatic CRC with concurrent HER2 amplification and a HER2 S310F mutation.

Over the past years, colorectal cancer (CRC) was subtyped according to its molecular and genetic characteristics, allowing the development of therapeutic strategies, based on predictive biomarkers. Biomarkers such as microsatellite instability (MSI), RAS and BRAF mutations, HER2 amplification or NTRK fusions represent major tools for personalized therapeutic strategies. Moreover, the routine implementation of molecular predictive tests provides new perspectives and challenges for the therapeutic management of CRC patients, such as liquid biopsies and the reintroduction of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. In this review, we summarize the current landscape of targeted therapies for metastatic CRC patients, with a focus on new developments for EGFR blockade and emerging biomarkers (MSI, HER2, NTRK).

Purpose Poziotinib, a pan-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has shown potent activity againstwild type of epidermal growth factorreceptor(EGFR) family kinases including EGFR, HER2, and HER4 and EGFR-mutant cells in vitro. Two phase I studies were conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, safety, and antitumor activity against advanced solid tumors. Materials and methods Standard 3+3 dose escalation scheme using two different dosing schedules were studied: once daily, 14-day on, and 7-day off (intermittent schedule); and once daily continuous dosing with food effect. Additional patients were enrolled in an expansion cohort. Results A total of 75 patients were enrolled in the two studies. The most common drug-related treatment-emergent adverse eventswere diarrhea,rash, stomatitis, pruritus, and anorexia. Doselimiting toxicities were grade 3 diarrhea in the intermittent schedule and grade 3 anorexia and diarrhea in the continuous dosing schedule. The MTDs were determined as 24 mg/day in the intermittent dosing schedule and 18 mg/day in the continuous dosing schedule. Eight (16%) and 24 (47%) of 51 evaluable patients in the intermittent schedule achieved partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD), respectively. Four (21%) and six (32%) of 19 evaluable patients in continuous dosing schedule achieved PR and SD, respectively. Patients with PR (n=7) or SD ≥ 12 weeks (n=7) had HER2 amplification (n=7; breast cancer, 5; and stomach cancer, 2) and EGFR amplification (n=1, squamous cell lung cancer). Conclusion Poziotinib was safe and well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors. It showed an encouraging activity against EGFR-mutant and HER2-amplified cancers.

Purpose While HER2 testing is well established in directing appropriate treatment for breast cancer, a small percentage of cases show equivocal results by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Alternative probes may be used in equivocal cases. We present a single community-based institution’s experience in further evaluating these cases. Patients and methods Between 2014 and 2016, 4255 samples were submitted for HER2 amplification testing by alternative probes, TP53, RAI1, and RARA. Of the patients tested by FISH, 505/3908 (12.9%) also had IHC data. Results Most (73.9%) FISH equivocal cases remained equivocal after IHC testing. However, 50.5% of equivocal cases were classified as HER2 amplified by alternative probes. Most cases were positive by more than one probe: 78% of positive cases by RAI1 and 73.9% by TP53. There was a significant difference between IHC and FISH alternative testing (p

Estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) is the most common BC subtype, defined by expression of the ER and absence of HER2 amplification. Endocrine treatment (ET), aiming at therapeutic blockade of ER signaling, represents the therapeutic mainstay for patients with both early and advanced disease. Despite its wide therapeutic efficacy, ET fails for a proportion of ER+, HER2- BC patients with early disease who develop endocrine resistance, resulting in disease recurrence. Endocrine resistance occurs almost invariably in patients with metastatic disease. Recently, increasing understanding of the molecular mediators of endocrine resistance has been achieved. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms mediating endocrine resistance, on molecularly targeted agents to overcome or delay it, and potential predictive biomarkers for accurate patient stratification.

The main obstacle for designing effective treatment approaches in breast cancer is the extensive and the characteristic heterogeneity of this tumor. The vast majority of critical genomic changes occurs during breast cancer progression, creating a significant variability within primary tumors as well as between the primary breast cancer and their metastases, a hypothesis have already demonstrated in retrospective studies (1). A clear example of this is the HER2-positive breast cancer. In these tumors, we can find all of the transcriptional subtypes of breast cancer, even the basal like or luminal A subtypes. Although the HER2-enriched is the most representative transcriptional subtype in the HER2-positive breast cancer, we can find it too in breast cancers with HER2-negative status. This intrinsic subtype shows a high expression of the HER2 and is associated with proliferation-related genes clusters, among other features. Therefore, two hypotheses can be suggested. First, the HER2 amplification can be a well-defined driver event present in all of the intrinsic subtypes, and not a subtype marker isolated. Secondly, HER2-enriched subtype can have a distinctive transcriptional landscape independent of HER2 amplification. In this review, we present an extensive revision about the last highlights and advances in clinical and genomic settings of the HER2-positive breast cancer and the HER2-enriched subtype, in an attempt to improving the knowledge of the underlying biology of both entities and to explaining the intrinsic heterogeneity of HER2-positive breast cancers.

Cetuximab (CTX) has been used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with wild-type (wt) RAS and BRAF genes. Meanwhile HER2 amplification reportedly denoted CTX-resistant mCRC tumors. We investigated whether monitoring of HER2 amplification in circulating DNA allowed early detection of mCRC progression and CTX resistance. We analyzed HER2 amplification in circulating DNA at 8-week intervals using ddPCR from 36 patients with RASwt/BRAFwt mCRC, who progressed after CTX treatments between July 2015 and January 2018. Of the 36 patients, 5 (13.9%) exhibited dynamic fluctuations of HER2 amplification in plasma in the course of CTX treatment, of whom 2 were positive for HER2 amplification in matched tumor specimens at baseline (per FISH). All 5 primary sites were left side: 3 rectums and 2 descending colon. HER2 ratio fluctuations in circulating DNA not only reflected changes in tumor volume, but their obvious increases presaged CT-documented progress by an average lead time of 2 months. Interestingly, progression-free survival did not significantly differ between these 5 patients and those without HER2 amplification (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.40–2.77, P = 0.909). Plasma HER2 amplification detected by ddPCR changed over time and predicted resistance to CTX, by an average lead time of 2 months. Further study is needed to validate our findings.

Purpose Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) alterations are found in approximately 1%-3% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). We evaluated the clinical features and outcomes of NSCLC harboring HER2 alteration detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS) in Korea. Materials and methods A total of 1,108 patients who were diagnosed with NSCLC between December 2015 and December 2017 were screened and analyzed by NGS. Medical records were reviewed retrospectively to analyze the clinical characteristics and outcomes from various treatments. Results HER2 alterations were identified in 36 NSCLC patients. Of the patients, 22 (61.1%) had an exon 20 in-frame insertion mutation, 15 (41.7%) had HER2 amplification, and one had both. The median patient age was 58 years, 55.6% were male, and 50.0% were never-smokers. Adenocarcinoma was predominant (88.9%). The most common metastatic site was bone (58.3%), and 66.7% of patients were stage IV at initial diagnosis. Six patients (16.7%) had a coexistent sensitizing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, and two patients (5.6%) had anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement. With a median 14 months of follow-up, the median progression-free survival of first-line treatment was 6 months (95% confidence interval, 4.172 to 7.828), and median overall survival was not reached. The proportions of adenocarcinoma, never-smokers, and metastasis to the liver were higher in the exon 20 in-frame insertion mutation group, whereas coexistence of EGFR mutation was more frequently found in the HER2 amplification group. Conclusion HER2-altered NSCLC showed distinct clinical features. Moreover, different characteristics were identified between the HER2 in-frame insertion mutation group and the HER2 amplification group.

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring MET exon 14 skipping can benefit from crizotinib treatment. Currently, the main resistance mechanisms to crizotinib are MET D1228N and Y1230C mutations. We reported a case of a Chinese NSCLC patient with MET exon 14 skipping detected by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) achieved clinical and imaging remission after crizotinib treatment. Then, amplification of multiple genes such as erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (HER2) was detected when disease progressed, indicating novel resistance mechanisms to crizotinib. Ultimately the patient died from cancer-related factors. This was the first NSCLC case with MET exon 14 skipping which reported the HER2 gene amplification at the time of progression during crizotinib treatment, indicating that bypass mechanisms contribute to the development of acquired resistance to MET inhibitors.

TPS3141 Background: The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene amplification and mutations have emerged as oncogenic drivers and therapeutic targets not limited to breast and gastric cancers, but also in a variety of cancers. However, even if an actionable gene alteration is found, the incidence of HER2 amplification in these cancers is less than 5%. Despite its considerable therapeutic potential, the evidence is not yet mature enough for use as treatment in clinical practice. To address this unmet clinical need, we have designed an organ-agnostic basket trial, which covers a variety of solid cancers harboring HER2 amplification. Methods: JUPITER trial is a Japanese multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 basket study of combination therapy with trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Patients with solid cancers harboring HER2 amplification, who have progressed with standard treatment, or rare cancers for which there is no standard treatment, are eligible. Types of cancer include bile duct, urothelial, uterine, ovarian, and other solid cancers that HER2 amplification is detected by comprehensive genomic profiling using next-generation sequencing technology. Target sample size is 38. All enrolled patients receive combination therapy with trastuzumab and pertuzumab every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal of informed consent. Response assessment using RECIST version 1.1 is performed at weeks 9 and 17, followed by every 12 weeks. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate, and secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, overall survival, duration of response, and safety. In total, 40 patients were enrolled by June 2020. Data fix is scheduled in September 2021. Trial registration: jRCT2031180150 Clinical trial information: jRCT2031180150.

593 Background: Digital pathology has fostered the development of automated diagnostic solutions. However, current technologies in breast cancer remain unable to determine HER2 amplification status, which is established by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). These ancillary tests carry a significant cost, prolong diagnostic time and fail to capture HER2 tumor heterogeneity and tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) burden, both of which determine the effectiveness anti-HER2 targeted therapy. Methods: This study describes the real-life clinical context development and validation of a patented novel, universal, automated, white-box, scanning platform agnostic solution that determines HER2 amplification status, prognostically significant TIL levels and tumor heterogeneity index (HI) from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained malignant breast biopsy whole slide images (WSIs) alone. Unlike conventional artificial intelligence-based approaches, the underlying proprietary algorithm’s prediction criteria are explainable and are based on deterministic, hard-coded observational relationships of scale constructed from image morphological features mapped to observables representing underlying tumor-related perturbations in biological pathways/mitotic checkpoints.This includes G1/S deregulation signatures reflecting oncogenic HER2-neu. Results: Blinded validation of HER2 status prediction (n = 197 WSIs; 118 independent cases/patients) showed excellent diagnostic performance (κ = 0.85) relative to existing standard-of-care methodologies. This was independent of WSI file format, background histology, tumor subtype/grade or hormone receptor status. The device also displayed good accuracy (92%) in determining TIL profiles, and its combined HER2-TIL and HER2-HI prediction scales both exhibited a significant association with progression-free survival (CoxPH hazard ratio: 1.856; 95% CI: 1.002-3.438; p = 0.049 and CoxPH hazard ratio: 3.45; 95% CI: 0.95-12.55; p = 0.060). Conclusions: This technology opens up the future possibility of bypassing existing ancillary HER2 profiling investigations, thus potentially reducing laboratory workloads/healthcare costs while accelerating diagnostic turnaround times for patient benefit. In the interim, if used as an adjunct tool, this device could provide an objective HER2 testing reference scale while the robustness of its prediction of patient response to anti-HER2 targeted therapy is fully explored.

68 Background: HER2 amplification is an emerging biomarker in colorectal cancer (CRC) with increased copy number associated with improved clinical outcomes to HER2 targeting. RAS/RAF wildtype CRC also benefit from use of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition (EGFRi). The sequencing of EGFRi versus HER2 inhibition in low copy number HER2 amplified CRC remains uncertain. Patient-derived cancer organoids (PDCOs) allow an ex vivo method to assess treatment sensitivity. We examined treatment sensitivity of a HER2 amplified PDCO at baseline and following resistance to panitumumab and trastuzumab. Methods: Following IRB-approval, fresh CRC tissue was cultured to maturation. After expansion, subcultures were treated with stepwise (20%) increase to physiologic Cmax of panitumumab (230ug/mL) and trastuzumab (180ug/mL). Threshold for escalation was median relative growth of +20% at 96h. Sensitivity was assessed on primary culture (RC1), panitumumab resistance (RC1-P) and trastuzumab resistance (RC1-T) using 96h of physiologic Cmax panitumumab, trastuzumab, and combination trastuzumab/pertuzumab. Individual sphere response was assessed for change in mean NADH autofluorescence intensity and ratio of NADH/FAD signal. Response was assessed at 96h in comparison to control using effect size of Glass’s Delta (GΔ). Results: Molecular profiling revealed HER2 copy number of 14 with no concurrent alterations in RAS, RAF, or PIK3CA. Time to resistance was similar between panitumumab (55 days) and trastuzumab (51 days). RC1 had baseline growth (+116%) which was reduced with single agent panitumumab (+17%, GΔ=1.40) with intermediate sensitivity to trastuzumab (+48%, GΔ=0.95) and trastuzumab/pertuzumab (46%, GΔ=0.99). Normalized NADH/FAD ratio revealed significant metabolic response to panitumumab (-20%, GΔ=0.66) and trastuzumab/pertuzumab (-35%, GΔ=1.16) with insignificant effect of single agent trastuzumab (-14%, GΔ=0.46). Following resistance to panitumumab, RC1-P had persistent growth with trastuzumab (+68%) which improved in combination trastuzumab/pertuzumab (+34%, GΔ=1.16). Following resistance to trastuzumab, RC1-T was insensitive to EGFRi with panitumumab including persistent growth (+58%, GΔ=0.70) and unchanged metabolism (+2%, GΔ=-0.10). Conclusions: Therapeutic dose escalation in a single PDCO of HER2 amplified CRC suggests improved sensitivity to EGFRi and dual HER2 targeting with trastuzumab/pertuzumab. Resistance to EGFRi resulted in persistent sensitivity to dual HER2 inhibition using trastuzumab/pertuzumab, however resistance to single agent trastuzumab. Resistance to trastuzumab resulted in future insensitivity to EGFRi. Molecular profiling at resistance revealed no pathologic alterations in EGFR or ERBB2 signaling, with ongoing analysis of transcriptional changes by RNAseq.

In metastatic colorectal cancer, the optimization of upfront treatment and the continuum of care based on patients’ exposure to multiple treatment lines have reached a plateau of efficacy. Therefore, a paradigm shift is ongoing towards precision medicine and personalized treatments based on the specific molecular features of the disease. In this perspective, the improved knowledge of disease biology coming from the lab has prompted a rapid translation from bench to bedside of newer targeted strategies. Here, we focus on the most promising biomarkers already included or close to adoption in daily clinical practice. In particular, evidence about the potential roles of BRAF mutation, HER2 amplification, MGMT methylation, microsatellite instability, and ALK, ROS and NTRK1–3 rearrangements as positive predictors of benefit from biological agents is reviewed and discussed.

Introduction. Breast cancer is the most common cancer among Polish women. Overexpression of the HER2 protein or HER2 gene amplification is associated with a poor prognosis, simultaneously being an indication for the HER2-targeted therapy. In equivocal cases, the FISH assay is used for the final identification of the HER2 gene status. This evaluation should be performed according to the ASCO-CAP guidelines which have been changed in 2013. The aim of this study was to assess whether and how the changes of recommendations affected the distribution of the FISH results. Materials and methods. The results of routine diagnostic FISH analyses were compared for two independent groups of patients assessed with different evaluation criteria (ASCO-CAP 2007 for n = 680 and ASCO-CAP 2013 n = 851), and also in a group of 763 patients, where both criteria were used simultaneously. Results. A comparison of the results obtained in two independent groups showed that the change of evaluation criteria did not alter the percentage of HER2-positive tests (with HER2 amplification). However, the frequency of HER2-negative analyses (without HER2 amplification) diminished significantly from 76.2% to 61.8%, whereas the equivocal group (with an indefinite status of HER2 amplification) increased from 0.4% to 13.6%. In the group where both criteria from 2007 and 2013 were used, we also discovered statistically significant differences. The frequency of HER2-positive results were elevated from 10.6% to 16.8%. The equivocal results were also found more often, rising from 4.2% to 15.6%, while the number of negative results lowered from 85.2% to 67.6%. Conclusions. The use of ASCO/CAP recommendations for the assessment of the HER2 gene status reduces the group of negative results, and concurrently enlarges the number of positive and equivocal ones. This indicates that the new criteria extends the access to HER2-targeted therapy. Nevertheless, they also raise the frequency of analyses with an indefinite status of the HER2 gene. Our outcome suggests that there is a need for an enhanced FISH-based evaluation of this gene in the last group of patients in order to provide them with an unambiguous stratification to risk groups.

553 Background: HER2 expression or amplification qualify patients to receive targeted therapeutics against HER2; however, traditional methods of quantifying HER2 amplification using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) do not include a reliable definition for low level amplification. With the promising response rate of patients with low HER2 amplified-metastatic breast cancer to subsequent-line trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a) therapy, there is a need to improve the existing criteria to accurately identify patients with low HER2. In our study, we investigate whether HER2 amplification quantified by NGS could provide a method to stratify patients into subgroups. Methods: A total of 774 patients diagnosed with breast cancer from Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (GDPH) who underwent targeted NGS using 520 or 33 cancer-related genes and had their HER2 status evaluated with either FISH or IHC were included in this study. HER2 status were defined as per 2018 ASCO/ACP guidelines. Results: Our results demonstrate that NGS could quantify HER2 amplification with high sensitivity and specificity, with area under the curve of 0.990 [95%CI: 0.982-0.999]. The receiver operating curve indicated an optimal cut-off of 2.62 copy number (CN) for identifying IHC/FISH HER2-negative status with 97.8% specificity. Meanwhile, the cut-off of ≥ 3.62 CN identified patients with IHC/FISH HER2-positive status with 99.8% specificity. Among the 774 patients, 65.8% (n = 509) had HER2 CN of ≤ 2.62 and were classified as HER2 non-amplified, while 25.8% (n = 199) had HER2 CN of ≥ 3.62, classified as HER2-amplified. The remaining 66 patients (8.5%) had HER2 CN between 2.62 and 3.62, and were the patients with heterogeneous IHC/FISH results, classified using NGS as HER2 low-amplified. Patients with low-amplified (49.0% vs. 38.8%, P < 0.001) and amplified (50.3% vs. 38.8%, P < 0.001) HER2 had significantly more number of copy number amplifications in other gene, including CDK12, RARA, and SPOP (P < 0.001, P < 0.001) than patients with HER2 non-amplified, indicating distinct mutation profile. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that NGS could provide a more accurate stratification of patients based on their HER2 amplification levels. Patients with low levels of HER2 amplification has a distinct mutation profile, suggesting that NGS could serve as a robust tool to identify patients with HER2 amplification, whether high or low, who could benefit treatment with targeted agents designed against heterogeneous HER2 expression.

e12632 Background: Untreated HER2 (Human Epidermal Growth Factor) amplified breast cancer has poorer prognosis, compared to those with HER2 negative status with shorter time to relapse and increased incidence of metastases and higher mortality. Both Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab (humanized monoclonal antibodies against HER2) have shown to improve PCR (Pathological Complete Response) rates when used in the neoadjuvant setting. However, whether the quantitative level of HER2 amplification affects PCR rates or disease-free survival/overall survival has not been well studied. If the level of HER2 amplification correlates with PCR rates, this could be a tool for clinicians to use as a predictive marker for response to therapy. Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of community oncology clinic patients with HER2 amplified breast cancer Stage I-III to evaluate the rates of PCR after HER2 targeted neo-adjuvant therapy categorized by HER2 CISH (Chromogenic in situ hybridization) amplification and stratified based on levels of amplification of < 3, 3 to 5, or > 5. Pathology reports were reviewed for report of PCR. Inclusion criteria was women age 19 to 90, HER2 positive biopsy proven breast cancer, Stage I-III, patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adequate renal function, and left ventricular ejection fraction within normal range. Exclusion criteria was pregnancy, metastatic disease, history of other malignancies, and impaired renal or cardiac function. Results: The data consisted of 36 unique patients, 25% of whom had a HER2 below 3, 22.2% had a HER2 between 3 and 5, and 52.8% had a HER2 value > 5. There was found to be a statistically significant association between the level of HER2 amplification and PCR rates with increased amplification of HER2 relates with increased PCR rates (p value < 0.0176). Both three-year disease-free survival and three-year overall response rates were not statistically significantly associated with HER2 category (p value -0.2691 and 0.4692 respectively). Conclusions: The information from this study may introduce a future systematic approach to further risk stratify patients based upon their quantitative HER2 amplification level to help predict response to therapy. We have noted that a level of HER2 amplification > 5 led to significant association with PCR compared to < 3 and 3-5 values.

e12641 Background: HER2 targeted therapy in combination with chemotherapy have changed the aggressive natural history of HER2-positive tumors. To select patients to be treated with this type of agents, determination of HER2 status is usually carried out by immunohistochemistry, followed by in situ hybridization in equivocal cases (2+). There are contradictory data in literature regarding correlation between level of HER2 amplification determined by FISH and early and long-term treatment benefits. Objectives: The aim of this study was to correlate quantitative results of FISH (ratio HER2/CEN17 and number of HER2 signals/nucleus) with the grade of response to neoadjuvant treatment with trastuzumab and chemotherapy. Methods: We analyzed 100 consecutive cases of stage I-III breast carcinomas treated with trastuzumab and chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting at A Coruña University Hospital between 2005 and 2016. At Santiago University Hospital, 4 tissue microarrays were prepared and the IQFISH (Dako-Agilent) technique was performed using pretreatment biopsies. Results: HER2 amplification was found in 92 of 100 cases studied. Pathological Complete Response (pCR) (Miller-Payne grading system) was obtained in 58% of the patients whose tumors showed amplification. No pCR was obtained in the 8 patients whose tumors were negative by FISH (not amplified). Analysis of the quantitative results demonstrated a statistical significant direct correlation between pCR and both HER2/CEN17 ratios and HER2 gene copies/nucleus (p = 0.002 and p= 0.004, respectively). We also demonstrated an association between the HER2 amplification level (both ratios and numbers of HER2 signals) and a trend toward improved disease free survival (DFS) (p = 0.451 and p= 0.619, respectively). Conclusions: HER2 amplification level determined by FISH it is a good and available predictive factor of response and must be included in pathologic reports because it can provide valuable information to oncologists on the possibilities of achieving pCR after neoadjuvant treatment in HER2-positive breast cancer. Key words: Breast cancer, FISH, HER2 amplification, trastuzumab, neoadjuvant therapy, pathological complete response.

4086 Background: The randomized phase III CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial found no difference in overall survival (OS) in first-line mCRC pts treated with either bevacizumab (Bev) or cetuximab (Cet) combined with the same chemotherapy. We investigated the potential prognostic and predictive value of HER2 amplification and HER2 gene expression using NGS and Nanostring data. Methods: Primary tumor DNA from 559 patients (pts) was profiled for HER2 amplification by NGS (Foundation One). Tumor tissue from 925 pts was tested for Nanostring gene expression using an 800 gene panel. OS and progression free survival (PFS) were the endpoints as time-to-event variables. Cox proportional hazard models with gene expression fitted with linear spline (one internal knot at median) were used, adjusting for pts baseline characteristics, treatment assignment, and molecular features (microsatellite instability, BRAF, all RAS). Results: Of 505 tumors with both NGS and Nanostring data, 16 harbored HER2 amplification (copy number variation > 6), limited to microsatellite stable tumors and significantly associated with HER2 expression ( P < 0.001) and wild-type RAS ( P = 0.036). HER2 amplification was neither prognostic nor predictive for OS or PFS. Conversely, HER2 expression higher than median was associated with longer PFS ( P = 0.018) but not OS ( P = 0.13). Among pts with HER2 not amplified, higher HER2 expression was associated with better OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95%CI, 0.72-0.97; P = 0.016) and PFS (HR, 0.85; 95%CI, 0.74-0.98; P = 0.027) when the expression was less than median. Additionally, in pts with no HER2 amplification and HER2 expression lower than median, treatment with Cet was associated with worse PFS compared to Bev (HR, 1.46; 95%CI, 1.12-1.90; P = 0.005). This effect was not observed with expression higher than median regardless of HER2 amplification status. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest analysis of HER2 amplification and gene expression in mCRC pts treated with standard therapy. Our results provide novel insight on the predictive and prognostic value of HER2 gene expression in pts treated with Cet- and Bev-based regimens. Upon validation, these findings could inform pts selection and the design of more effective treatment options for pts with low HER2 expression. Clinical trial information: NCT00265850.

Introduction: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is defined by the absence of ER expression, PR expression and HER2 amplification. No targeted treatment is available for TNBC and chemotherapy remains the best therapeutic option. However, in the case of recurrence or chemo-resistance, therapeutic options are very limited. TNBC presents a high rate of proliferation and is highly aggressive having low survival rate. As the complexity of this disease is being simplified over time, new targets are also being discovered for the treatment of this disease. Therefore, there is still need for new biomarkers, which would serve for targeted treatment. Transgelin was proposed as a new potential cancer biomarker. Altered expression of Transgelin has been described in a wide range of cancers, often with contradictory results. The aim of the study was to compare Transgelin expression across molecular subtypes of breast cancer, to identify if it can be used as a future molecular targeted protein for TNBC. Material and Methods: Transgelin immunohistochemistry was applied on 60 retrospectively collected paraffin blocks of patients presenting with invasive breast carcinoma (NST) having different molecular subtypes. Blocks were collected between 2015 and 2016 from Pathology department, Medical Research Institute, Egypt. Her2 equivocal cases were excluded from the study. Results: Transgelin expression was positive in 23 cases and negative in 37 cases. There was a statistically significant difference between (Transgelin +) and (Transgelin -) cases being highly expressed in TNBC in comparison to other molecular subtypes. It was also highly expressed in tumors with large size, high grade, positive lymph-vascular invasion status & lymph node metastasis. There was no statistically significant difference between (Transgelin+) and (Transgelin-) as regards age and Her2 status. Conclusions: Transgelin is an aggressive biomarker differentially expressed among the molecular breast cancer subtypes with high expression in TNBC. Transgelin may provide a potential target for future treatment of TNBC.

Invasive lobular carcinoma with extracellular mucin is an uncommon pattern of invasive breast carcinoma. The 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Breast Tumors states that it is unknown whether these tumors are a subtype of mucinous carcinoma or invasive lobular carcinoma. Invasive lobular carcinoma with extracellular mucin frequently presents as a palpable mass and may be more likely to be grade 2 to 3 and HER2-positive than classic invasive lobular carcinoma. This case of pleomorphic invasive lobular carcinoma with extracellular mucin was detected by imaging only and was HER2-amplified, suggesting that a subset of these tumors may be clinically occult with an aggressive phenotype. Invasive lobular carcinoma with extracellular mucin is infrequently encountered and awareness of this entity is helpful in avoiding misdiagnosis.

In HER2 -amplified breast cancers, HER2 inhibitors have been very successful as adjuvant therapy but not as monotherapy. Here, we demonstrate that coamplification of a HER2 intronic miRNA causes intrinsic resistance to HER2 inhibitors by indirectly down-regulating the pro-apoptotic NOXA. Importantly, coinhibition with MCL-1 inhibitors overcomes this resistance. HER2 (ERBB2) amplification is a driving oncogenic event in breast cancer. Clinical trials have consistently shown the benefit of HER2 inhibitors (HER2i) in treating patients with both local and advanced HER2+ breast cancer. Despite this benefit, their efficacy as single agents is limited, unlike the robust responses to other receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors like EGFR inhibitors in EGFR -mutant lung cancer. Interestingly, the lack of HER2i efficacy occurs despite sufficient intracellular signaling shutdown following HER2i treatment. Exploring possible intrinsic causes for this lack of response, we uncovered remarkably depressed levels of NOXA, an endogenous inhibitor of the antiapoptotic MCL-1, in HER2 -amplified breast cancer. Upon investigation of the mechanism leading to low NOXA, we identified a micro-RNA encoded in an intron of HER2, termed miR-4728, that targets the mRNA of the Estrogen Receptor α (ESR1). Reduced ESR1 expression in turn prevents ERα-mediated transcription of NOXA, mitigating apoptosis following treatment with the HER2i lapatinib. Importantly, resistance can be overcome with pharmacological inhibition of MCL-1. More generally, while many cancers like EGFR -mutant lung cancer are driven by activated kinases that when drugged lead to robust monotherapeutic responses, we demonstrate that the efficacy of targeted therapies directed against oncogenes active through focal amplification may be mitigated by coamplified genes.

Targeting HER2 is effective in 24% of ERBB2 amplified metastatic colorectal cancer; however, secondary resistance occurs in most of the cases. We studied the evolution of individual metastases during treatment to discover spatially resolved determinants of resistance. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis identified alterations associated with resistance in the majority of refractory patients. ctDNA profiles and lesion-specific radiographic reports revealed organ- or metastasis-private evolutionary patterns. When radiologic assessments documented progressive disease in target lesions, response to HER2 blockade was retained in other metastases. Genomic and functional analyses on samples and cell models from eight metastases of a patient co-recruited to a postmortem study unveiled lesion-specific evolutionary trees and pharmacologic vulnerabilities. Lesion size and contribution of distinct metastases to plasma ctDNA were correlated.

Overcoming tumor heterogeneity is a major challenge for personalized treatment of gastric cancer, especially for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 targeted therapy. Analysis of circulating tumor DNA allows a more comprehensive analysis of tumor heterogeneity than traditional biopsies in lung cancer and breast cancer, but little is known in gastric cancer. We assessed mutation profiles of ctDNA and primary tumors from 30 patients with advanced gastric cancer, then performed a comprehensive analysis of tumor mutations by multiple biopsies from five patients, and finally analyzed the concordance of HER2 amplification in ctDNA and paired tumor tissues in 70 patients. By comparing with a single tumor sample, ctDNA displayed a low concordance of mutation profile, only approximately 50% (138/275) somatic mutations were found in paired tissue samples, however, when compared with multiple biopsies, most DNA mutations in ctDNA were also shown in paired tumor tissues. ctDNA had a high concordance (91.4%, Kappa index = 0.784, P < 0.001) of HER2 amplification with tumor tissues, suggesting it might be an alternative for tissue. It implied that ctDNA-based assessment could partially overcome the tumor heterogeneity, and might serve as a potential surrogate for HER2 analysis in gastric cancer.

To assess the need for adjustment in the likelihood of germline BRCA1/2 mutations in women with HER2+ breast cancers. We analysed primary mutation screens on women with breast cancer with unequivocal HER2 overexpression and assessed the likelihood of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations by age, oestrogen receptor status and Manchester score. Of 1111 primary BRCA screens with confirmed HER2 status only 4/161 (2.5%) of women with HER2 amplification had a BRCA1 mutation identified and 5/161 (3.1%) a BRCA2 mutation. The pathology adjusted Manchester score between 10 and 19% and 20%+ thresholds resulted in a detection rate of only 6.5 and 15% respectively. BOADICEA examples appeared to make even less downward adjustment. There is a very low detection rate of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women with HER2 amplified breast cancers. The Manchester score and BOADICEA do not make sufficient downward adjustment for HER2 amplification. For unaffected women, assessment of breast cancer risk and BRCA1/2 probability should take into account the pathology of the most relevant close relative. Unaffected women undergoing mutation testing for BRCA1/2 should be advised that there is limited reassurance from a negative test result if their close relative had a HER2+ breast cancer.

Background. The primary objectives of this study on carcinomas with equivocal HER2 expression were to assess the impact of distinct recommendations with regard to identifying patients eligible for anti-HER2 agents by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and to elucidate whether multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) may be of support in assessing HER2 gene status. Methods. A cohort of 957 immunohistochemistry-evaluated HER2-equivocal cases was analyzed by dual-color FISH. The results were assessed according to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and College of American Pathologists (CAP) 2007 and 2013 guidelines for dual- and single-signal in situ hybridization (ISH) assays. A subgroup of 112 cases was subjected to MLPA. Results. HER2 amplification varied from 15% (ASCO/CAP 2007 HER2/CEP17 ratio) to 29.5% (FDA/EMA HER2 copy number). According to the ASCO/CAP 2013 interpretation of the dual-signal HER2 assay, ISH-positive carcinomas accounted for 19.7%. In contrast with the ASCO/CAP 2007 ratio, this approach labeled as positive all 32 cases (3.34%) with a HER2/CEP17 ratio Conclusion. The ASCO/CAP 2013 guidelines seem to improve the identification of HER2-positive carcinomas. Polymerase chain reaction-based methods such as MLPA can be of help, provided that heterogeneous amplification has been ruled out by ISH.

6001 Background: SGCs are rare tumors with no approved therapy for metastatic disease. HER2 amplification occurs in 8% among all SGC histologies, and 25-33% of the aggressive salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) histologic subtype. We hypothesized that ado-trastuzumab emtansine, a HER2 targeted antibody drug conjugate, may be clinically active in these patients. Methods: A cohort of patients with HER2 amplified SGCs were enrolled into a multi-histology basket trial of ado-trastuzumab emtansine, treated at 3.6mg/kg IV every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1 or PERCIST. A Simon two-stage optimal design was applied with type I error rate under 2.7%, power of 89%, H0 10%, H1 40%; H0 will be rejected if 6 or more responses are observed in 24 patients. Other endpoints include duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. HER2 amplification was identified by next generation sequencing (NGS), and tumors were subsequently tested by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy - Förster resonance energy transfer (FLIM-FRET) assessed the propensity for HER2-HER3 heterodimerization, which leads to receptor internalization. Results: 10 patients with HER2 amplified SGCs were treated. The median age was 65 (range 36-90 years), 90% were male. The median lines of prior systemic therapy was 2 (range 0-3). ORR was 90% (9/10, 95% CI 56-100%) including 5 complete responses after prior trastuzumab, pertuzumab and anti-androgen therapy. After a median follow up period of 12 months (range 4-20 months), median DOR (range 2-19+) and median PFS (95% CI 4–22+ months) were not reached. Toxicities included grade 1 or 2 infusion reaction, thrombocytopenia and transaminitis; there were no treatment related deaths. HER2 amplification by NGS (fold change 2.8 to 22.8) correlated with HER2/CEP17≥2 by FISH (8/8 tested) or IHC3+ (10/10 tested). FLIM-FRET tested positive in 3/3. Conclusions: Ado-trastuzumab emtansine is highly efficacious in patients with HER2 amplified SGCs as identified by NGS. This study has met its primary endpoint, and cohort expansion is warranted to confirm these results. Clinical trial information: NCT02675829.

e12560 Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive form of breast cancer (BC) which lacks estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 amplification. Due to the fact that up to 50% of TNBC express AR and that AR expression has been associated with poor prognosis, targeting AR in TNBC is attracting increasing interest. However, although targeting AR in prostate cancer results in initial response, resistance eventually develops, resulting in treatment failure. We previously identified Serum Response Factor (SRF) as an important transcription factor in a cellular model of castrate-resistant prostate cancer. We showed a relationship between SRF and AR which potentially plays a role in the resistance to AR-targeted therapy. Therefore, we hypothesise that AR resistance mechanisms could be bypassed by targeting SRF, singly or in combination with AR-inhibitors. Methods: In this study three TNBC cell lines with different SRF/ AR levels were selected to investigate the effect of SRF inhibition on cell viability, cell migration and cell invasion. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess SRF expression in 3 BC TMAs: TMA1 (n = 144) and TMA2 (n = 512) with different subtypes of BC and TMA3 with 138 TNBC patients. Results: MTT assays showed response to CCG1423 in the two cell lines positive for SRF (MDA-MB-231 and HS578t) with IC50 values of 20 uM, while MDA-MB-453 (SRF negative) did not respond (IC50 > 80uM). In addition, a synergistic effect on cell viability was demonstrated when CCG1423 was used in combination with MDV3100. Scratch assays to assess cell migration showed a slower gap-closure post- CCG1423 treatment compared to controls. In addition, CCG1423 treatment significantly reduced both cell lines’ ability to invade by approximately 50% at 48 hours post-treatment (p < 0.05). Analysis of SRF expression in clinical samples showed higher SRF protein expression in TNBC vs. non-TNBC patients. In addition, one TMA (n = 144) showed that higher SRF expression was associated with shorter overall survival (HR 1.99 [CI (1.02, 3.87)], P value 0.039) and shorter disease specific survival (HR 2.93 [CI (1.19, 7.21)], P value 0.014). Conclusions: Our data support the rationale for using SRF as an alternative target to AR, alone or in combination with AR-antagonists.

Targeting HER2 for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancers is now a validated treatment paradigm. However, evidence suggests that this family of receptors may have important roles outside of the realm of HER2 amplification. There is considerable interest in the development of biomarkers to identify such breast cancers. Clin Cancer Res; 21(13); 2886–8. ©2015 AACR. See related article by Leary et al., p. 2932

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the commonest cause of gynaecological cancer-associated death. The disease typically presents in postmenopausal women, with a few months of abdominal pain and distension. Most women have advanced disease (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] stage III), for which the standard of care remains surgery and platinum-based cytotoxic chemotherapy. Although this treatment can be curative for most patients with early stage disease, most women with advanced disease will develop many episodes of recurrent disease with progressively shorter disease-free intervals. These episodes culminate in chemoresistance and ultimately bowel obstruction, the most frequent cause of death. For women whose disease continues to respond to platinum-based drugs, the disease can often be controlled for 5 years or more. Targeted treatments such as antiangiogenic drugs or poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors offer potential for improved survival. The efficacy of screening, designed to detect the disease at an earlier and curable stage remains unproven, with key results expected in 2015.

Aim: We examined an economical method for evaluating the amplification of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene in breast cancer specimens. Materials and Methods: We compared HER2 amplification determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on whole-tissue (WT) blocks used for diagnostic and on tissue microarray (TMA) sections for a cohort of 521 consecutive patients with breast cancer. In a subset of 116 patients, we examined HER2 concordance from the WT section and a TMA section from a randomly chosen additional block (a proxy of the core biopsy). Results: Overall concordance for HER2 amplification between WT and TMA sections was 98.2%, and between sections from WT and from the additional block was 99.0%. Conclusion: The high concordance rates support the use of TMA for the evaluation of HER2 amplification in breast cancer and suggest that FISH can be used to assess HER2 using core biopsies.