Search

Copyright of Namık Kemal Tıp Dergisi is the property of Galenos Yayinevi Tic. LTD. STI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the relation of the pre-treatment hemoglobin-albumin-lymphocyte-platelet (HALP) score with survival and prognosis of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients receiving chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods: We retrospectively included 45 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with chemoradiotherapy. The HALP score was calculated as hemoglobin level (g/L)*albumin level (g/L)*lymphocyte count (/L)/platelet count(/L). Results: According to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the median of the HALP score was 42.36. According to this value, the patients were divided into two groups; Group 1 included 28 patients who had a HALP score <42.36 and Group 2 included 17 patients who had a HALP score >42.36. Median OS was 20.5 months in Group 1 and the median OS was not reached in Group 2 (p=0.033). Median PFS in all patient groups was 15.2 months. The median PFS was 12.2 months in Group 1 and 30.9 months in Group 2 (p=0.127). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that pre-treatment low levels of HALP were associated with a short median time of OS (p=0.042). Conclusion: Our study suggested that pretreatment low HALP score was associated with poor OS in patients with locally advanced ESCC who were treated with CRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: We compared the survival outcomes of surgery within multimodality treatment regimens with the outcomes of definitive chemoradiation treatments in patients diagnosed with clinical (c) IIIB/N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated whether surgery within multimodality treatment provides a survival advantage at this stage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from 79 patients with cIIIB/N2 between 2009 and 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. While the surgery was performed after neoadjuvant therapy in 51 cases (IIIB/Surgery Group), definitive chemotherapy ± radiotherapy was applied in 28 cases (IIIB/Definitive Group). RESULTS: In cIIIB/N2 cases, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 27.4%, with a median OS of 24.6 months. The 5-year OS of the IIIB/ Surgery Group was 27.3% (median survival 22.5 months), while it was 28.6% (median survival 29.1 months) in the IIIB/Definitive Group (P = .387, HR = 0.798, 95% CI, 0.485-1.313). Although there was a survival advantage in the group with a pathological complete response (PCR) after surgery (n = 14) compared to the group that did not (n = 37), the observed difference was not statistically significant. (5-year OS; 42.9% vs. 18.5%, P = .104). Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference between the survival of PCR patients and the IIIB/Definitive Group in terms of OS (P = .488). CONCLUSION: Surgery performed within multimodality treatment regimens in selected cIIIB/N2 cases did not provide a survival advantage over definitive chemoradiation treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: More than half of gastric cancer patients have no chance of resection at the time of diagnosis. In gastric cancer, which has increased frequency with age, chemotherapy efficacy and tolerability in metastatic gastric cancer aged 75 and over have been investigated due to the fact that the elderly patient population is not sufficiently involved in the studies. Methods: In our study, the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients, treatment regimens and responses, prognostic factors, grad 3-4 toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined. Results: In the study involving 118 patients, PFS was 5.8 months and OS was 8.4 months. A disease control rate of 38.1% was achieved with chemotherapy. Conclusion: Since the OS in this study was 10.5 months in patients with ECOG PS 0-1, 13.8 months in patients who received two lines or more, and the frequency of side effects was acceptable, we believe that this patient population should not be left untreated. Since there are acceptable survival values even with single-agent therapies, monotherapy can be recommended for patients with poor ECOG PS and combination therapies can be recommended for patients with good PS without comorbidities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cancer is a significant health problem for refugees and host countries. Breast cancer is the most common cancer among refugees. The subject of our study is to examine the clinical and pathological features of Syrian refugees with breast cancer and compare them with Turkish patients with breast cancer. Methods: Data of patients with breast cancer between January 2018 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical and histological features, treatment modalities and overall survival were collected and analyzed. Results: A total number of 338 women with breast cancer were included in this study. Ninety-nine of the 338 (29.3%) patients were Syrian refugees and 239 patients (70.7%) were Turkish. The median follow-up time was significantly lower in Syrian patients (P < 0.001). Median OS was 146 months in Turkish and 116 months in Syrian group (P = 0.022). Independent risk factors associated with long survival were receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.465; 95% CI 0.234-0.926; P = 0.029), adjuvant radiotherapy (HR 0.372 95% CI 0.182-0.758; P = 0.007), and adjuvant hormonotherapy (HR 0.367; 95% CI 0.201-0.669; P = 0.001). The rates of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy, and adjuvant hormonal therapy were significantly lower in the Syrian group (P = 0.023, P = 0.005, P = 0.002, respectively). Conclusion: Syrian refugees with breast cancer are more likely to receive suboptimal treatments. They have inferior survival compared to local patients. Our findings highlight the need for the provision of cancer therapy in such vulnerable populations. We suggest that more attention should be paid to breast cancer, as it is the most common cancer among refugees. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Cytokines have been the mainstay of treatment in metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) for decades before the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which dramatically changed the therapeutic landscape in these patients. This observational study was designed to evaluate use of TKIs in the treatment of cytokine-intolerant mRCC patients. Methods: A total of 151 cytokine-intolerant mRCC patients who were treated with TKIs (sunitinib, pazopanib and sorafenib) were enrolled in this prospective, non-interventional, multi-center observational study at 16 oncology centers across Turkey. Mean (SD) age was 61.3 (11.1) years and 74.8% were males. Data on duration of TKI treatment was the primary outcome measure. Additionally, overall response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety data were recorded. Results: Median duration of treatment was 8.2 months at a median follow up of 17.9 months. ORR and disease control rate were 12.5% and 70.8%, respectively. Median PFS and OS were 7.5 months (95%CI: 6.4–10.4) and 27.3 months (95%CI: 17.6–27.3) with no significant difference among three TKI agents in terms of treatment duration, ORR, PFS and OS. The most common adverse events excluding progression-which was the protocol requirement were diarrhea (13.6%), asthenia (13.6%) and hand-foot syndrome (12.6%). Dose modifications were required in 30.5% of the patients and 15% discontinued TKIs because of toxicity. Conclusions: Our findings confirm the efficacy and safety profile of TKIs in the first-line treatment of mRCC patients intolerant to cytokine treatment. There was no significant difference among three TKI agents in terms of treatment duration, ORR, PFS and OS. Trial registration: TURCOS ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01585974. Registered April 25, 2012. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: Neuroendocrine tumors of the lungs are a clearly different group of tumors with definite ultrastructural, immunohistochemical, and molecular features. We reported and analyzed the incidence, clinicopathological features, surgery rates, responses to first-line therapy, and survival outcomes of this rare condition according to our lung cancer patient database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected the data of 62 patients who were histopathologically diagnosed with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of lung (LCNEC) between January 2010 and January 2016. RESULTS: The patients were predominantly (95%) men (male:female=59:3) with their average age being 60.3±8.6 years. Diagnosis was made by the fine-needle aspiration biopsy (NAB) in 7 patients, bronchoscopic transbronchial biopsy in 13, and surgery in 42. Nearly 43.5% of the patients presented with the tumor in the right upper lobe. Additionally, tumors of 46.8% patients could be observed in peripheral locations. Sixteen patients presented with stage 1, 17 with stage 2, 15 with stage 3, and 14 with stage 4. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 29 months (SE: 12.2) (95% CI, 5.2-52.8 months). Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly better in patients with low N, M0, early stage, p63 positive, and TTF-1 positive across the entire cohort. Overall survival (OS) was significantly better in patients with comparatively lower N, M0, low stage, and peripheral location. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a single-center experience with clinicopathologic factors and survival outcomes of LCNEC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]