Search

Consensus guidelines exist for genotype‐guided fluoropyrimidine dosing based on variation in the gene dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD). However, these guidelines have not been widely implemented in North America and most studies of pretreatment DPYD screening have been conducted in Europe. Given regional differences in treatment practices and rates of adverse events (AEs), we investigated the impact of pretreatment DPYD genotyping on AEs in a Canadian context. Patients referred for DPYD genotyping prior to fluoropyrimidine treatment were enrolled from December 2013 through November 2019 and followed until completion of fluoropyrimidine treatment. Patients were genotyped for DPYD c.1905+1G>A, c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G, and c.1236G>A. Genotype‐guided dosing recommendations were informed by Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who experienced a severe fluoropyrimidine‐related AE (grade ≥3, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0). Secondary outcomes included early severe AEs, severe AEs by toxicity category, discontinuation of fluoropyrimidine treatment due to AEs, and fluoropyrimidine‐related death. Among 1394 patients, mean (SD) age was 64 (12) years, 764 (54.8%) were men, and 47 (3.4%) were DPYD variant carriers treated with dose reduction. Eleven variant carriers (23%) and 418 (31.0%) noncarriers experienced a severe fluoropyrimidine‐related AE (p = 0.265). Six carriers (15%) and 284 noncarriers (21.1%) experienced early severe fluoropyrimidine‐related AEs (p = 0.167). DPYD variant carriers treated with genotype‐guided dosing did not experience an increased risk for severe AEs. Our data support a role for DPYD genotyping in the use of fluoropyrimidines in North America.

Female patients with breast cancer frequently develop arthralgia when treated with aromatase inhibitors (AI). Although the mechanism of AI-induced arthralgia is unknown, potential biomarkers have been identified. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and genetic predictors of AI-induced arthralgia in a prospective cohort of patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. One hundred and ninety-six patients were enrolled at initiation of AI therapy with either letrozole or anastrozole. Patients completed two validated self-report questionnaires assessing pain, stiffness, and physical function at baseline, and repeated the questionnaires at two and at six months after the initiation of treatment with an AI. Germline DNA of all patients was genotyped for seven single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) previously identified by genetic screens and genome-wide association studies as associated with AI-induced arthralgia. More than 50% of the study group experienced arthralgia symptoms. Genetic analysis revealed that four SNPs, in CYP19A1 (rs4775936) and ESR1 (rs9322336, rs2234693, rs9340799), were associated with the development of arthralgia (adjusted P = 0.016, 0.018, 0.017, 0.047). High body mass index (BMI) was also associated with the development of arthralgia symptoms (adjusted P = 0.001). Patients prescribed letrozole were significantly more likely to develop arthralgia than patients on anastrozole (P = 0.018), and also more likely to discontinue AI therapy due to arthralgia. The CYP19A1 (rs4775936) SNP was significantly associated with discontinuation of therapy due to intolerable arthralgia. Our results suggested that BMI and AI drug (letrozole versus anastrozole) were clinical predictors of arthralgia, while genetic variants rs4775936, rs9322336, rs2234693, and rs9340799 were genetic predictors of AI-induced arthralgia. Significantly, rs4775936 was also a predictor of discontinuation of therapy.

Background: Tamoxifen is widely used in patients with hormone sensitive breast cancer in the adjuvant setting to decrease risk of recurrence and metastasis. 5-10 years of tamoxifen has demonstrated a near 50% reduction in recurrence risk. Despite marked interpatient variation in the metabolism of tamoxifen to its active metabolite endoxifen, all patients are prescribed 20 mg daily dose of tamoxifen. Current evidence suggests that patients are at risk for suboptimal benefit if measured endoxifen concentration is below 5.9 ng/ml (~15nM). However, there have been conflicting data on the clinical utility of CYP2D6 genotype testing, and measuring endoxifen plasma concentration as a predictor of breast cancer recurrence. The goal of this prospective study was to determine the impact of endoxifen levels and CYP2D6 genetic variations to clinical outcome among patients with early breast cancer. Methods: Since 2010, as part of Personalized Medicine Program in Oncology, our team has been prospectively enrolling patients on tamoxifen therapy. To date 950 patients have been enrolled and preliminary analysis has been completed in 429. After initial CYP2D6 genotype testing, plasma concentration of tamoxifen and its metabolites were quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry during each clinic visit. Baseline characteristic are outlined in table 1. Primary outcome assessed was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) defined as time since start of tamoxifen therapy till an event of interest such as loco-regional recurrence, distant metastasis, new contralateral primary breast cancer, death due to breast cancer and other causes. Patients were censored at their last encounter at our institution (London Health Sciences Centre). Results: IDFS data for 426 patients were obtained. Outcome was stratified by CYP2D6 phenotypes (ultra-rapid, extensive, intermediate and poor metabolizers) and endoxifen levels (>5.9ng/ml or vs< 5.9 ng/ml showed a clear trend towards lower IDFS (hazard ratio = 2.4, (95%CI,1.26-4.77) P=0.0002) among those with endoxifen < 5.9 ng/ml. We note this preliminary data analysis was unadjusted and will undergo further in-depth statistical analysis. Conclusion: Preliminary finding suggests endoxifen concentration, but not CYP2D6 phenotype, may be a predictor of risk for suboptimal benefit during tamoxifen therapy. Detailed statistical analysis is planned for the full cohort, including adjustment for covariates including tumor stage, menopausal status, drug interactions, and use of aromatase inhibitors. To our knowledge, this is the first study of its type to prospectively collect multiple plasma samples for tamoxifen and endoxifen level in real-world patients during tamoxifen therapy, with sufficient sample size and follow-up period for primary clinical outcome. Table 1: Baseline Characteristics of PatientsCharacteristicsCYP2D6-Phenotypes, n=429 (%)Endoxifen concentration, n=429 (%)UM/EMIMPM>5.9ng/ml(~15nm) Citation Format: Veera Durga Sravanthi Panuganty, Denise Keller, Wendy A Teft, John Gordon Lenehan, Kylea Raijann Potvin, Jawaid Younus, Theodorus Anthony Vandenberg, Diane Mary Logan, Karin Hahn, Muriel Brackstone, Phillip Stanley Blanchette, Francisco Perera, Yun-Hee Choi, Richard Brian Kim. Clinical outcomes in early breast cancer patients on adjuvant tamoxifen: Impact of CYP2D6 genotype and observed endoxifen concentrations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-12-05.

Rosuvastatin is commonly prescribed for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and hepatic transporter-mediated accumulation in the liver enhances its efficacy. Current guidelines indicate no preference for fed or fasted rosuvastatin administration. We investigated the association between food intake and rosuvastatin disposition in healthy subjects and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering effects among patients taking rosuvastatin. We demonstrate that administration with food resulted in a near 40% reduction of rosuvastatin exposure in healthy Asian (n = 12) and Caucasian (n = 11) subjects. Higher rosuvastatin concentrations in Asian subjects also correlated with higher allele frequency of ABCG2 c.421C>A. In mice, a greater rosuvastatin liver:plasma ratio was noted when administered with food. Among rosuvastatin patients (n = 156), there was no difference in dose needed to reach target LDL-C, measured LDL-C, or lathosterol concentrations, when administered in a fed or fasting state. Therefore, taking rosuvastatin with food could reduce systemic concentrations, and subsequent myopathy risk, without compromising LDL-C-lowering benefit.

The aromatase inhibitor (AI) letrozole is a first-line drug in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Adherence to AI therapy, including letrozole, remains problematic due to the development of debilitating AI-induced arthralgia. Letrozole is metabolized in the liver by CYP2A6. It remains unknown if plasma letrozole levels or CYP2A6 genetic variation is associated with the development of arthralgia. We enrolled 126 female breast cancer patients initiated on letrozole therapy and prospectively collected blood samples at baseline and two follow-up time points to determine letrozole plasma concentrations and CYP2A6 genotype. At each visit, participants completed two validated questionnaires to assess the severity of arthralgia symptoms. More than half (55%) of patients experienced a significant increase in their arthralgia symptoms after initiation of treatment. The clinical variables of body mass index (P = 0.0003) and age (P = 0.0430) were negatively and positively associated with plasma letrozole concentrations, respectively. CYP2A6 genotype was significantly associated with letrozole levels (P

Tamoxifen is frequently prescribed to prevent breast cancer recurrence. Tamoxifen is a prodrug and requires bioactivation by CYP2D6. Tamoxifen use is often limited by adverse effects including severe hot flashes. There is paucity of prospectively collected data in terms of CYP2D6 genotype and measured tamoxifen, 4-hydroxytamoxifen and endoxifen concentrations in relation to hot flash severity during tamoxifen therapy. We conducted a longitudinal prospective study of breast cancer patients on tamoxifen (n = 410). At each visit, blood samples were collected, and patients completed a standardized hot flash survey (n = 1144) that reflected hot flash severity during the 7 days prior to the visit. Plasma concentrations of tamoxifen, 4-hydroxytamoxifen, and endoxifen were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and genotyping was carried out for CYP2D6. A linear mixed-effects regression analysis assessed the association of covariates in relation to the hot flash severity score (HFSS). Median age at first assessment was 50 years with 61.9% of patients considered peri-menopausal. Most patients (92.2%) experienced hot flash symptoms with 51.0% having low HFSS (0–4) and 7.32% experiencing HFSS > 25. Age was significantly associated with hot flash severity, with patients aged 45–59 more likely to have higher HFSS. Neither duration of tamoxifen therapy nor observed tamoxifen, endoxifen and 4-hydroxy tamoxifen plasma concentration predicted hot flash severity. Genetic variation in CYP2D6 or CYP3A4 was not predictive of hot flash severity. Hot flash severity during tamoxifen therapy can not be accounted for by CYP2D6 genotype or observed plasma concentration of tamoxifen, 4-hydroxytamoxifen, or endoxifen.

Background Azathioprine (AZA)-induced pancreatitis is an unpredictable and dose-independent adverse event affecting 2%-7% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients treated with AZA. There are no tools in clinical practice to identify at-risk individuals; however, a genome wide association study (GWAS) identified a strong association between the Class II HLA gene region polymorphism (rs2647087) and thiopurine-induced pancreatitis. Aim To independently confirm the findings of the GWAS in an IBD cohort, to evaluate its utility in clinical practice and to offer a novel AZA treatment algorithm for IBD based on pharmacogenomic principles. Methods A retrospective cohort study evaluated 373 AZA-exposed IBD patients from a tertiary care academic centre in London, Canada. Due to the limited number of patients taking mercaptopurine (MP), such patients were not included this cohort. All subjects underwent screening for the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs2647087 mapped to the HLA-DQA1*02:01-HLA-DRB1*07:01 haplotype and were sub-divided based on the presence (n = 13) or absence (n = 360) of an AZA-induced pancreatitis diagnosis. The risk of AZA-induced pancreatitis was assessed based on rs2647087 genotype. Results The risk of pancreatitis during AZA-therapy was highly predictable and genotype dependent: 0.53% for wild type (A/A), 4.25% (OR = 4.19, 95% CI 1.02-36.45, P = 0.044) for heterozygous (A/C), and 14.63% (OR = 15.83, 95% CI 3.80-145.26, P = 0.0001) for homozygous variant (C/C) patients. Conclusions The class II HLA region (at rs2647087) is an important marker of AZA-induced pancreatitis risk. We propose a simple and clinically implementable algorithm based on rs2647087 and TPMT genotypes for AZA selection and dosing for patients with IBD.

BACKGROUND: Azathioprine (AZA)-induced pancreatitis is an unpredictable and dose-independent adverse event affecting 2–7% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients treated with AZA. There are no tools in clinical practice to identify at-risk individuals; however, a genome wide association study (GWAS) identified a strong association between the Class II HLA gene region polymorphism (rs2647087) and AZA-induced pancreatitis. AIMS: To independently confirm the findings of the GWAS in an IBD cohort, to evaluate its utility in clinical practice and to offer a novel AZA treatment algorithm for IBD based on pharmacogenomic principles. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study evaluated 373 AZA-exposed IBD patients from a tertiary care academic centre in London, Canada. All subjects underwent screening for the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs2647087 mapped to the HLA-DQA1*02:01-HLA-DRB1*07:01 haplotype and were sub-divided based on the presence (n = 13) or absence (n = 360) of an AZA-induced pancreatitis diagnosis. The risk of AZA-induced pancreatitis was assessed based on rs2647087 genotype. RESULTS: The risk of pancreatitis during AZA-therapy was highly predictable and genotype dependent: 0.53% for wild-type (A/A), 4.25% (OR=4.19, 95%CI 1.02–36.45, p=0.044) for heterozygous (A/C), and 14.63% (OR=15.83, 95%CI 3.80–145.26, p=0.0001) for homozygous variant (C/C) patients. CONCLUSIONS: The class II HLA region (at rs2647087) is an important marker of AZA-induced pancreatitis risk. We propose a simple and clinically implementable algorithm based on rs2647087 and TPMT genotypes for AZA selection and dosing for patients with IBD. FUNDING AGENCIES: CAG, CCC, CIHRCancer Care Ontario

The gastrointestinal (GI) microbiome is recognized for potential clinical relevance in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Data suggest that there is a disease-dependent loss of microbial diversity in IBD. Trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) is generated by GI anaerobes through the digestion of dietary phosphatidylcholine and carnitine in a microbial-mammalian co-metabolic pathway. IBD-related changes in the gut microbiome may result in disease-specific changes in TMAO plasma concentrations. To determine whether TMAO plasma levels in IBD are altered compared to controls and whether they correlate with disease presence or activity. Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure TMAO, choline, and carnitine plasma levels in 479 subjects (373 non-IBD controls, 106 IBD). Subjects were also genotyped for the flavin monooxygenase (FMO)3 variants, E158K and E308G. Plasma TMAO levels were 2.27 µM lower in the IBD population compared to the control population (p = 0.0001). Lower TMAO levels were similarly seen in active ulcerative colitis (UC) (1.56 µM) versus inactive disease (3.40 µM) (p = 0.002). No difference was seen in active Crohn’s disease (CD) versus inactive CD. No intergroup variation existed in plasma TMAO levels based on FMO3 genotype. Choline levels were higher in IBD, while carnitine levels were similar between the two groups, suggesting that lower TMAO levels in IBD were not due to dietary differences. Decreased TMAO levels are seen in IBD compared to a non-IBD population. These data suggest that TMAO may have potential as a biomarker to support IBD diagnosis as well as to assess disease activity in UC.

The use of pharmacogenomics to personalize drug therapy has been a long-sought goal for warfarin and tamoxifen. However, conflicting evidence has created reason for hesitation in recommending pharmacogenomics-guided care for both drugs. This review will provide a summary of the evidence to date on the association between cytochrome P450 enzymes and the clinical end points of warfarin and tamoxifen therapy. Further, highlighting the clinical experiences that we have gained over the past ten years of running a personalized medicine program, we will offer our perspectives on the utility and the limitations of pharmacogenomics-guided care for warfarin and tamoxifen therapy.

Tamoxifen use is often limited in some patients due to adverse effects including severe hot flash symptoms. Tamoxifen undergoes hepatic bioactivation by CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 to form the active metabolite endoxifen. It remains unclear whether the extent of attained endoxifen level or genetic polymorphisms in drug metabolizing enzymes is associated with the frequency and severity of hot flashes. We conducted a prospective study using self-reported surveys to assess tamoxifen side effects experienced during the week prior to clinic visits of 132 female breast cancer patients on tamoxifen therapy, and hot flash severity scores were tabulated. At the time of clinic visit, blood samples were obtained to determine tamoxifen and its metabolite levels and to determine CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 genotypes. The majority of participants (77 %) experienced hot flashes, with 11 % experiencing severe or very severe symptoms. We observed an inverse correlation between endoxifen concentration and hot flash severity score following adjustment for age, BMI, and menopausal status in patients with non-zero scores (p

3028 Background: Fluoropyrimidines remain integral components of modern chemotherapy for solid tumors, and their toxicities can be reduced by pretreatment DPYD genotyping. Our main objective was to demonstrate the feasibility of implementing a hospital-wide pretreatment DPYD testing service based on the CPIC 2013 guideline on fluoropyrimidines and DPYD. Methods: We enrolled participants prior to planned fluoropyrimidine treatment as well as those who had experienced adverse events (AEs) after initiation of therapy, from December 1, 2013 to November 30, 2018. The patients tested pretreatment were analyzed as a prospective cohort to assess AEs within 90 days of fluoropyrimidine initiation and associated hospital cost. The primary outcome was the rate of severe global fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity in the pretreatment cohort (grade≥3, CTCAE v.4.0.3). Results: Of 1362 patients genotyped for DPYD within the study period 1041 were enrolled pretreatment and included in the primary analysis. The median age was 65 years (19-90), 57% male, 51% 5-FU, and 49% capecitabine. Dose reductions were recommended for 21 DPYD variant carriers who were detected pretreatment. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between DPYD variant (29%) and wild type (18%) patients (Fisher’s exact test p = 0.25). Costs associated with ER visits and hospitalizations at our tertiary care centre were $1,268 (89-8,562) (Median (IQR)) and $2,961 (341-13,567) for DPYD variant (n = 4) and wild-type (n = 99) patients respectively. Post-AE genotyping (n = 70) found five DPYD variant patients; all experienced grade≥3 toxicity, costs were $15,825 (10,962-25,310), and one poor metabolizer died due to complications. Targeted next generation exome sequencing of DPYD wild-type patients who experienced severe AEs identified five potentially deleterious genetic variants in ABC efflux transporters. Conclusions: Pretreatment DPYD genotype guided dosing of fluorouracil and capecitabine is feasible and benefits patients, health care providers, and hospitals. Our data supports adoption of pretreatment DPYD genotyping as a standard of care.

Adverse drug reactions, including an unexpected lack of efficacy and toxicity, are common and costly, being the fourth leading cause of death among hospitalized patients [1]. For most drugs in clinical use, there exists marked interpatient variability in drug responsiveness, often related to pharmacogenetic (PGx) differences. This holds true for breast cancer patients taking tamoxifen, the most commonly used adjuvant antiestrogen therapy. These patients are prescribed a single 20 mg/day dose of tamoxifen, for at least 5 years, with the hope that this ‘one-size-fits-all’ strategy will be effective at preventing recurrence. However, we recently observed that endoxifen levels in patients on the same dose can vary by tenfold, and nearly 25% of these patients are not achieving optimal benefit [2]. Tamoxifen is a prodrug that undergoes hepatic metabolism, predominantly by the CYP450 enzyme CYP2D6, to form its active metabolite known as endoxifen [3]. Endoxifen is 50–100-times more effective at blocking the estrogen receptor compared with tamoxifen; therefore, attaining and maintaining sufficient levels of endoxifen is likely to be key to therapeutic success. Recently, Murdter et al. demonstrated that endoxifen concentrations higher than 14 nM are required for 90% estrogen receptor occupancy in vitro [4]. Additionally, Madlensky et al. observed that patients in the lowest quintile of endoxifen levels (

Tamoxifen is a widely utilized adjuvant anti-estrogen agent for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, known to undergo CYP2D6-mediated bioactivation to endoxifen. However, little is known regarding additional genetic and non-genetic determinants of optimal endoxifen plasma concentration. Therefore, 196 breast cancer patients on tamoxifen were enrolled in this prospective study over a 24-month period. Blood samples were collected for pharmacogenetic and drug-level analysis of tamoxifen and metabolites. Regression analysis indicated that besides CYP2D6, the recently described CYP3A4*22 genotype, seasonal variation, and concomitant use of CYP2D6-inhibiting antidepressants were significant predictors of endoxifen concentration. Of note, genetic variation explained 33 % of the variability while non-genetic variables accounted for 13 %. Given the proposed notion of a sub-therapeutic endoxifen concentration for predicting breast cancer recurrence, we set the therapeutic threshold at 18 nM, the 20th percentile for endoxifen level among enrolled patients in this cohort. Nearly 70 % of CYP2D6 poor metabolizers as well as extensive metabolizers on potent CYP2D6-inhibiting antidepressants exhibited endoxifen levels below 18 nM, while carriers of CYP3A4*22 were twofold less likely to be in sub-therapeutic range. Unexpectedly, endoxifen levels were 20 % lower during winter months than mean levels across seasons, which was also associated with lower vitamin D levels. CYP3A4*22 genotype along with sunshine exposure and vitamin D status may be unappreciated contributors of tamoxifen efficacy. The identified covariates along with demographic variables were integrated to create an endoxifen concentration prediction algorithm to pre-emptively evaluate the likelihood of individual patients falling below the optimal endoxifen concentration.

Background Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely prescribed for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). An important advantage of DOACs is that routine monitoring of an anticoagulation response is not necessary. Nevertheless, because of their mechanism of action, a DOAC anticoagulation effect can be inferred based on the observed plasma concentration. However, there is a paucity of data relating to observed interpatient variation in DOAC plasma concentrations in the postmarket clinical setting. Methods We determined rivaroxaban and apixaban plasma concentrations in patients with AF during routine clinic visits. Results Among 243 patients (rivaroxaban, n = 94; apixaban, n = 149) enrolled in this study, a 60- and 50-fold interpatient variation in plasma concentration was observed for rivaroxaban and apixaban, respectively. Approximately 12% of patients receiving rivaroxaban and 13% of patients receiving apixaban exceeded the 95th percentile for predicted maximum plasma concentration observed in clinical trials. Conclusions In this routine-care setting, rivaroxaban and apixaban plasma concentrations tended to be more variable than those observed in clinical trials. Identification of additional clinical and molecular determinants that more fully predict patients at risk for excessively high or low DOAC concentrations may enable a more precise DOAC dosing regimen for the individual patient.

Tamoxifen is a prodrug, requiring cytochrome P450 enzyme-mediated metabolism to form the active metabolite endoxifen. We identified a case of drug-drug interaction involving tamoxifen and phenytoin, associated with a markedly lower endoxifen level than predicted. The patient is a 49-year-old woman, genotyped as a cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) extensive metabolizer, chronically taking phenytoin for a seizure disorder. The plasma endoxifen level 2 months after starting tamoxifen was 4.72 nmol/l, the lowest level we have seen in our clinic among patients with CYP2D6 extensive metabolizer genotypes (n=195). To our knowledge, this is the first report documenting the extent of induction in terms of both tamoxifen and endoxifen levels during concomitant phenytoin therapy, and this effect would likely result in loss of therapeutic benefit from tamoxifen. Phenytoin should therefore not be used concurrently with tamoxifen for extended periods of time unless a therapeutic drug (endoxifen) monitoring strategy is utilized.

e18069Background: MATE1 (multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1) has an important role in excretion and transport of organic cations including a number of therapeutic drugs. We recently reported t...

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is chronic, often relapsing, remitting inflammation affecting the rectum to proximal colon. UC activity is linked to reduced gut microbial diversity. Trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) is a quantifiable plasma metabolite produced from dietary choline and carnitine through a microbial-mammalian pathway. A previous study by our group demonstrated decreased plasma TMAO was associated with UC. It was hypothesized that changes in the gut microbial profile accounted for differences in plasma TMAO concentrations. AIMS: To evaluate the gut microbial profile of subjects with UC and healthy controls to determine if it is predictive of plasma TMAO concentrations. METHODS: Thirty-three subjects (13 control (C), 20 UC) were recruited and informed consent was obtained. Demographic and disease activity data were collected. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure TMAO and dietary choline plasma concentrations. A combined 132 sigmoid colon pinch biopsies were taken during colonoscopy to quantify the mucosal-adherent microbial profile. The abundance of five bacterial genera (Bacteroides prevotella (Bp), Clostridium XIV (CXIV), Bifidobacterium longum (Bl), Lactobacillus (L), Enterobacteriaceae (E)), representative of the 4 main bacterial phyla present in the gastrointestinal tract, were quantified from biopsies using real-time PCR. RESULTS: TMAO plasma concentrations were reduced in UC compared to healthy controls (UC: 1.027 ± 0.896, C: 5.478 ± 3.655, p

Background Tamoxifen, a common anti-estrogen breast cancer medication, is a prodrug that undergoes bioactivation via cytochrome P450 enzymes, CYP2D6 and to a lesser degree, CYP3A4 to form the active metabolite endoxifen. With an increasing use of oral anti-cancer drugs, the risk for drug-drug interactions mediated by enzyme inhibitors and inducers may also be expected to increase. Here we report the first case demonstrating a potent drug-drug interaction in a real-world clinical setting between tamoxifen and rifampin in a breast cancer patient being treated concurrently for ulcerative colitis. Case presentation We describe a patient on adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer that was prescribed rifampin for TB prophylaxis prior to initiation of an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agent due to worsening ulcerative colitis. This 39 year old Caucasian woman had been followed by our personalized medicine clinic where CYP2D6 genotyping and therapeutic monitoring of tamoxifen and endoxifen levels had been carried out. The patient, known to be a CYP2D6 intermediate metabolizer, had a previous history of therapeutic endoxifen levels. Upon admission to hospital for a major flare of her ulcerative colitis a clinical decision was made to initiate an anti-TNFα biological agent. Due to concerns regarding latent TB, rifampin as an anti-mycobacterial agent was initiated which the patient was only able tolerate for 10 days. Interestingly, her plasma endoxifen concentration measured 2 weeks after cessation of rifampin was sub-therapeutic at 15.8 nM and well below her previous endoxifen levels which exceeded 40 nM. Conclusion Rifampin should be avoided in patients on tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer unless continued tamoxifen efficacy can be assured through endoxifen monitoring. Drug-drug interactions can pose a significant risk of sub-therapeutic benefit in tamoxifen patients. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2342-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background: Capecitabine is an oral chemotherapy pro-drug used to treat advanced colorectal cancer. Patients may experience hand-foot syndrome and diarrhea, among other side effects, that affect quality of life and may necessitate dose modification or discontinuation. There is significant regional variation in capecitabine tolerability, related to a myriad of factors including pharmacogenomics, dietary and cultural differences. Capecitabine dose modification, when necessary, is empirical based on toxicity suggesting a personalized dosing approach might better optimize therapy. Objective: In phase I of a personalized dosing approach, our objective was to define an optimal time point for blood sampling that best represented overall exposure of capecitabine and its metabolites. Methods: A single-arm prospective pharmacokinetic cohort study of patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer prescribed capecitabine monotherapy was done. Blood samples were collected pre-dose and at timed intervals between 0 and 8 hours post-dose. Plasma concentration of capecitabine and its major metabolites, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine (5'-DFCR) and 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouracil (5'-DFUR), were measured by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Results: 26 patients were enrolled; 65% were male and 42.3% had metastatic disease. Mean capecitabine dose was 2854 ± 944 mg. Hand-foot symptoms (60%), fatigue (53%) and diarrhea (30%) were the most common adverse drug reactions. Dose normalized mean (SD) AUC0-8h for capecitabine, 5’-DFCR and 5’-DFUR were 6.74 (3.0), 4.19 (1.5) and 6.33 (2.8) ng/ml*h, respectively. Spearman correlation between dose normalized concentrations and AUC at each blood draw was performed. The best estimated time points for capecitabine, 5’-DFCR and 5’-DFUR were 1.5, 2 and 2 hours with r2 values of 0.6 (p Conclusions: Blood samples obtained between 1.5 and 2 hours post-dose provide the best estimate of capecitabine exposure. Further pharmacokinetic analysis in this cohort is ongoing. This blood draw strategy will be used in a larger trial intended to develop a personalized capecitabine dosing algorithm. Citation Format: Stephen Welch, Wendy Teft, John Lenehan, Rommel Tirona, Karen Lumsden, Eric Winquist, Richard B. Kim. Defining an optimal single time point sampling strategy representative of overall capecitabine pharmacokinetics [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5042. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-5042

Background: Treatment of advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer with irinotecan is hampered by severe toxicities. The active metabolite of irinotecan, SN-38, is a known substrate of drug-metabolising enzymes, including UGT1A1, as well as OATP and ABC drug transporters. Methods: Blood samples (n=127) and tumour tissue (n=30) were obtained from advanced cancer patients treated with irinotecan-based regimens for pharmacogenetic and drug level analysis and transporter expression. Clinical variables, toxicity, and outcomes data were collected. Results: SLCO1B1 521C was significantly associated with increased SN-38 exposure (P

Tamoxifen is a widely prescribed adjuvant anti-estrogen agent for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Tamoxifen is known to undergo CYP2D6-mediated bioactivation to the active metabolite endoxifen. Endoxifen concentrations exhibit high interindividual variability, contributing to either sub-optimal tamoxifen efficacy or side effects in subsets of patients. However, the relationship between endoxifen exposure and tumor growth inhibition has not been well-characterized and little is known regarding the optimal in vivo endoxifen plasma level required for tumor inhibition. Pharmacokinetics–Pharmacodynamics (PK–PD) modeling was carried out to characterize the relationship between endoxifen concentration and tumor growth inhibition (TGI) in dose-ranging experiments in the human MCF7 xenograft bearing mouse model. Subsequently, simulations using human PK were used to determine the efficacious clinically relevant endoxifen concentration required to produce optimal tumor suppression. Based on the PK–PD model and simulations using clinical PK/concentration data of endoxifen, C stasis (100 % TGI) is observed at 53 nM, a concentration attained by many tamoxifen-treated patients. Importantly, PK–PD simulations indicate that mean steady-state levels observed in CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers are expected to result in optimal tumor suppression while mean concentrations observed in poor metabolizers are predicted to result in suboptimal TGI. Our study is the first to characterize the in vivo PK–PD relationship for endoxifen where clinically observed endoxifen concentrations are associated, in an exposure-dependent manner, with % TGI measured in a xenograft model. It is anticipated that endoxifen concentration achieved in individual patients is the limiting factor for achieving optimal tumor growth suppression.

578Background: Male breast cancer is rare and accounts for less than 1% of breast cancer diagnoses. The majority of male breast cancers are hormone-receptor positive and tamoxifen is the standard a...

The antimicrotubular agent docetaxel is a widely used chemotherapeutic drug that has been approved for the treatment of multiple malignant diseases, including cancers of the breast, lung, prostate, stomach, and head and neck. Docetaxel is predominantly dependent on hepatic disposition as ∼75% is excreted in bile. While it is known that docetaxel is a substrate of the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein (MDR1; P-gp), less is known regarding transporters that could mediate its cellular uptake and hepatic clearance. Accordingly, screening an array of drug uptake transporters and kinetic analysis for radiolabeled docetaxel transport using a recombinant vaccinia-based method demonstrated that organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs), including OATP1A2, OATP1B1 and OATP1B3, were capable of transporting docetaxel in vitro. In addition, an assessment of a panel of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in SLCO1B1 revealed that a number of OATP1B1 variants were associated with impaired docetaxel transport. To further evaluate docetaxel transport by OATP1B1 and OATP1B3, we generated MDCKII cells stably expressing MDR1, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OATP1B1-MDR1, and OATP1B3-MDR1 proteins. Using a transwell system, we then studied intracellular concentrations and transcellular transport after administration of radiolabeled docetaxel to the basal compartment. The transport assay revealed that docetaxel was transported significantly into the apical compartment of double transfected MDCKII-OATP1B1-MDR1/OATP1B3-MDR1 cells compared to the single transfected cells without MDR1 expression up to 3 hours (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, intracellular accumulation of docetaxel was not different between control cells and MDCKII-OATP1B1 or MDCKII-OATP1B3 cells, but was significantly lower in cell lines expressing MDR1 than in cell lines without MDR1 expression (p < 0.05). Consequently, in line with lower intracellular values, higher amounts of docetaxel were found in the apical compartment of cell lines expressing MDR1. Subsequently, we performed in vivo docetaxel transport studies in wild-type and Slco1b2-/- mice (ortholog to hepatic OATP1B1/OATP1B3). There was ∼>5-fold higher plasma concentrations of docetaxel in Slco1b2-/- versus wild-type mice (p < 0.01). The liver-to-plasma ratio of docetaxel was ∼3-fold decreased in Slco1b2-/- mice compared to wild-type mice (p < 0.05). The plasma clearance of docetaxel in Slco1b2-/- mice was 83% lower than wild-type mice (p < 0.05). In conclusion, we demonstrate functional interplay between transporter-mediated uptake and export in docetaxel disposition, suggesting hepatic OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 are important to docetaxel disposition. Moreover, OATP1B1 variants may contribute to the interindividual variability in docetaxel disposition and response. Accordingly, these findings reveal important new insights into the relevance of hepatic OATPs to the clinical pharmacology of docetaxel. Citation Format: Hye Jeong Lee, Brenda F. Leake, Wendy Teft, Richard B. Kim, Richard H. Ho. Contribution of hepatic uptake transporters OATP1B1/OATP1B3 to the disposition of docetaxel. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 3682. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-3682

e20657 Background: Tamoxifen is the most widely used anti-estrogen therapy for the treatment and prevention of hormone receptor positive breast cancers. However, its use is limited in some patients...