Search

An interdisciplinary group of clinical and non-clinical academics in Sweden created a research centre for the study of person-centred care (PCC) in long-term illness: the University of Gothenburg Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC). The GPCC steering committee formulated a position paper with three ‘simple routines’ to initiate, implement, and safeguard PCC in daily clinical practice. The EJCN accepted this position paper for publication in 2011. This brief review seeks to present how PCC, as defined in the position paper, has been used in research and published in EJCN during the past 5 years (2016–20). Clinical implications and future research in PCC are also suggested.

The purpose of this study was to explore the content and essential components of implemented person-centered care in the out-of-hospital context for older people (65+). Method A systematic review was conducted, searching for published research in electronic databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Embase between 2017 and 2019. Original studies with both qualitative and quantitative methods were included and assessed according to the quality assessment tools EPHPP and CASP. The review was limited to studies published in English, Swedish, Danish, Norwegian and Spanish. Results In total, 63 original articles were included from 1772 hits. The results of the final synthesis revealed the following four interrelated themes, which are crucial for implementing person-centered care: (1) Knowing and confirming the patient as a whole person; (2) Co-creating a tailored personal health plan; (3) Inter-professional teamwork and collaboration with and for the older person and his/her relatives; and (4) Building a person-centered foundation. Conclusion Approaching an interpersonal and inter-professional teamwork and consultation with focus on preventive and health promoting actions is a crucial prerequisite to co-create optimal health care practice with and for older people and their relatives in their unique context.

Aims: To study the prevalence of somatic and mental health comorbidity and the use of opioid medication among patients on long-term sick-leave due to chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP); to compare an orthopaedic-based assessment of ability to work with a team assessment; to investigate the relationship between intensity of pain and psychosocial characteristics in this group. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out with 174 consecutive patients on sick-leave for a mean of 21 months. All were referred from the Social Insurance Office for orthopaedic evaluation and assessment of the ability to work. Of them, only 83/174 patients were referred by the Office for psychiatric evaluation. Results: Neck pain was the main cause of disability. Patients with neck pain often suffered pain in more than two sites, and greater intensity of pain. Thirty-four percent of all participants had been prescribed opioid medication before consultation. Degrees of disability, unemployment, low degree of education and to be an immigrant were related to intensity of pain. Unrecognized psychiatric disorders changed the main cause of inability to work in 69% of patients who underwent both orthopaedic and psychiatric evaluation. Conclusions: An evaluation based on biopsychosocial function is valuable in reaching an accurate assessment of the patient’s diagnosis, and ability to work in CMP. Ability to work and degree of sick-leave in patients on long-term sick-leave is determined to a large extent by undiagnosed mental health comorbidities, and not solely somatic complaints.

INTRODUCCIÓN: El cáncer de mama desde 1992 ha sido la segunda causa de muerte femenina en Colombia (tasa promedio anual de 4,5*100.000 hab.) y se reporta una tendencia ascendente por este tipo de neoplasia, y la información sobre los potenciales factores de riesgo del cáncer de la mama en los países Latinoamericanos es escasa. Los objetivos del trabajo fueron probar la protección ofrecida por la lactancia materna, y establecer los factores reproductivos asociados al cáncer de mama en Colombia. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio de casos y controles hospitalarios pareados por edad (+ 2 años) de Julio 1995 a Marzo 1996 en Bogotá. La población de estudio quedó constituída por 171 casos histopatológicamente definidos y 171 controles. La historia reproductiva y sociodemográfica fué recolectada a través de un cuestionario y se utilizó la técnica de regresión logística condicionada para el análisis estadístico de la información. RESULTADOS: Se encontraron como factores de riesgo: la nuliparidad , al contrario de las mujeres con paridades mayores de 3 hijos (OR=3,35 IC 1,4 - 8,0), la edad al primer nacimiento (>20 años vs. menores de 20. OR= 1,83 IC 0,7 - 4,8), el antecedente familiar de cáncer de mama y la lactancia al primer hijo (OR=0,09 IC 0,01-0,64 de 1-11 meses y OR= 0,01 IC 0,00-0,14 para los 12 meses) y la lactancia acumulada por encima de los 24 meses (p=0,001 prueba de tendencia) como principales factores protectores de la enfermedad. CONCLUSIONES: El estudio confirma la importancia de enfocarse en la promoción de la lactancia prolongada y ratifica que el nivel socioeconómico puede determinar los estilos de vida y los eventos reproductivos de las mujeres, explicando el aumento en la mortalidad por cáncer de mama en los países Latinoamericanos, con perfiles de fecundidad y factores de riesgo para el cáncer de mama, similares a los de los países desarrollados. INTRODUCTION: As of 1992, breast cancer has been the second cause of death in Columbian women, with a rising trend in mortality due to this type of neoplasm (average annual rate 4.5*/100.000 inhabitants). Information about potential risk factors for breast cancer in Latin American countries is scarce. The objectives of the project were to test the breastfeeding protection against breast cancer and to establish the reproductive factors associated with breast cancer in Columbia. METHODS: A hospital case-control study was carried out from July 1995 to March 1996 in Bogotá, Columbia, using paring by age groups. The study population consisted of 171 histopathologically confirmed cases and 171 controls. Reproductive history and sociodemographic data were collected through a questionnaire, and logistic regression models were used for statistical analysis of the data. RESULTS: The following associated factors were found as principal results: nuli-parousness as compared with women with over 3 children (OR=3.35 CI 1.40-8.0), age at first birth (OR=1.83 CI 0.70- 4.80), breast cancer history, breastfeeding the first child (OR=0.09 CI 0.01-0.64 for 1-11 months) and with a highly significant trend for accumulated breastfeeding above 24 months (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates the importance of focusing on the promotion of prolonged breastfeeding by women identified as being at higher risk, and confirms that socio-economic level can determine life styles and reproductive events among women (such as breastfeeding time); this could explain the increase in breast cancer mortality in Latin American countries, similar to that in developed countries in terms of fertility and risk factors for breast cancer. The epidemiological information produced by this study will be useful for planning and carrying out early diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer in women identified as being at high risk of this disease. INTRODUÇÃO: O câncer de mama, desde 1992, tem sido a segunda causa de morte feminina na Colômbia (taxa média anual de 4,5*/100.000 hab.) mostrando tendência ascendente por este tipo de neoplasia, sendo poucas as informações sobre fatores de risco potenciais de câncer de mama nos países da América Latina. O estudo realizado objetivou testar a proteção da amamentação materna contra essa doença, e estabelecer fatores reprodutivos a ela associados. MÉTODOS: Realizou-se estudo de casos-controle hospitalares pareados por idade, de julho 1995 a março 1996. A população de estudo foi constituída por 171 casos histologicamente confirmados e 171 controles. A história reprodutiva e sociodemográfica foi coletada através de um questionário e adotada a técnica de regressão logística para efetuar a análise estatística dos dados. RESULTADOS: Como fatores de risco foram encontrados: nuliparidade, quando comparada com mulheres com mais de três filhos (OR=3,35 IC 1,4 - 8,0); idade do primeiro nascimento (>20 anos vs. menores de 20. OR= 1,83 IC 0,7 - 4,8); antecedente familiar de câncer mamário e amamentação do primeiro filho (OR=0,09 IC 0,01-0,64 de 1-11 meses e OR= 0,01 IC 0,00-0,14 para os 12 meses), e amamentação acumulada por mais de 24 meses (p=0,001 prova de tendência) como um dos principais fatores protetores da doença. CONCLUSÕES: O estudo confirma a importância de promover a amamentação prolongada e ratifica que o nível socioeconômico pode determinar o estilo de vida e os eventos reprodutivos das mulheres, explicando o aumento na mortalidade por câncer mamário nos países Latino-americanos, com perfil de fecundidade e fatores de risco para o câncer mamário, similares a dos países desenvolvidos.

Patricia Olaya-Contreras1, Torgny Persson2, Jorma Styf11Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy at The University of Gothenburg, Sweden; 2The Lundby Hospital, Gothenburg, SwedenBackground: Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is associated with psychological distress and long-term disability. Underlying diagnoses causing long-term sickness absence due to CMP have not been explored enough. In a somatic health care setting, it is important to identify mental health comorbidity to facilitate the selection of appropriate treatment. The objectives of this study were to compare the scores of depressed mood obtained on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) with the diagnosis of depression made by a psychiatrist, and to study the prevalence of undiagnosed mental health comorbidity in these patients.Methods and patients: 83 consecutive patients on sick leave (mean duration 21 months) due to CMP who had been referred by the Social Insurance Office to an orthopedist and a psychiatrist for assessment of the patient’s diagnoses and capacity to work. The mean age was 45 (23–61) years, 58% were women and 52% were immigrants. The accuracy of measurements was calculated using the Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV as the Gold standard.Results: Psychiatric illness was diagnosed in 87% of the patients. The diagnosis was depression in 56%, other psychiatric illnesses in 31%, whereas 13% were mentally healthy. Of all the patients, only 10% had a previous psychiatric diagnosis. The median value of the BDI score was 26 points in depressed patients, whereas it was 23 in patients with other psychiatric diagnoses. The sensitivity of the BDI to detect depression was 87.5%. We found good agreement between the BDI score and a diagnosis of depression.Conclusion: Undiagnosed psychiatric disorders were commonly seen in patients with CMP. The high sensitivity of the BDI scores enables the screening of mental health comorbidity in patients with a somatic dysfunction. The test is a useful tool for detecting distress in patients who are on long-term sick leave due to CMP and who need additional treatment.Keywords: agreement, disability, underlying diagnoses

Background and purpose Methods for identification of patients with illness behavior in orthopedic settings are still being debated. The purpose of this study was to test the association between illness behavior, depressed mood, pain intensity, self-rated disability, and clinical status in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP). Methods We examined 174 consecutive sick-listed patients (90 women). Musculoskeletal function was estimated by range of motion, muscle strength, and motor and sensory function. The degree of illness behavior was measured by Waddell signs (WS). Results WS were observed in 47/174 (27%) of the patients, 16% of whom manifested excessive illness behaviour. In general, more patients with WS were depressed (OR = 4.4; 95% CI: 1.8–11) and experienced greater pain (OR = 2.9; CI: 1.1–7.7). No abnormal physical function could be observed in two-thirds of the patients. Other predictive factors for manifesting WS at the clinical examinations were longer sick leave and previous full sick leave (p < 0.05). Interpretation Excessive illness behavior is related to psychological distress in patients with CMP and long-term disability. Thus, some patients may also require psychological assessment. Looking for WS during consultation is useful for targeting other factors that may be important in the diagnostic process.

Low back pain (LBP) is described as highly recurrent and frequently persistent public health worldwide. The “stay active” concept has been regarded as the most appropriate treatment recommendation for patients with acute LBP. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of distress on disability, physical activity and pain intensity in subjects with severe acute LBP. Methods A Randomised Control Trial (RCT) was conducted, 99 employed subjects (mean age 45 years, 20–63), 61% white- and 39% blue-collar workers with acute LBP were examined within 48 h after the onset of pain. All patients were initially assessed using the Depression Anxiety and Positive Outlook Scale (DAPOS) and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) questionnaires. Thereafter, the patients documented the following in a diary over a 7-day period: pain intensity, disability rating index (DRI) and step count (pedometer). Linear Mixed Models (LMM) for repeated measures were employed for the statistical analyses. All results were adjusted for age, gender, treatment, number of days and for the interaction term (treatment *DAPOS-D). Results Prospectively, DRI and pain intensity responses were differentially mediated by the treatment, in interaction with the scores of DAPOS (p 38) had a lower step count over time (p Conclusion Depressed mood and fear of movement affect the outcomes of disability, the level of physical activity and the pain intensity in patients with acute LBP.