Search

The aim of this study was to explore predictive factors for portal or splenic vein thrombosis (VT) that might cause serious problems after distal pancreatectomy (DP). A total of 230 patients who underwent DP between 2008 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed to identify predictive factors for portal or splenic VT. Ultimately, 164 patients were analyzed. Portal or splenic VT was significantly correlated with age

Background Pancreatic cancer is one of the lethal cancers among solid malignancies. Pathological diagnosis of surgical margins is sometimes unreliable due to tissue shrinkage, invisible field cancerization and skipped lesions like tumor budding. As a result, tumor recurrences sometimes occur even from the pathologically negative surgical margins. Methods We applied molecular surgical margin (MSM) analysis by tissue imprinting procedure to improve the detection sensitivity of tiny cancerous cells on the surgical specimen surface after pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgical specimens were collected from 45 pancreatic cancer cases who received subtotal stomach preserving pancreatoduodenectomy at Nagoya University Hospital during 2017–2019. Quantitative methylation-specific PCR (QMSP) of the original methylation marker panel (CD1D, KCNK12, PAX5) were performed and analyzed with postoperative survival outcomes. Results Among 45 tumors, 26 cases (58%) were QMSP-positive for CD1D, 25 (56%) for KCNK12 and 27 (60%) for PAX5. Among the 38 tumors in which at least one of the three markers was positive, CD1D-positive cancer cells, KCNK12-positive cancer cells, and PAX5-positive cancer cells were detected at the surgical margin in 8 cases, 7 cases and 10 cases, respectively. Consequently, a total of 17 patients had at least one marker detected at the surgical margin by QMSP, and these patients were defined as MSM-positive. They were associated with significantly poor recurrence-free survival (p = 0.002) and overall survival (p = 0.005) than MSM-negative patients. Multivariable analysis showed that MSM-positive was the only significant independent factor for worse recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio: 3.522, 95% confidence interval: 1.352–9.179, p = 0.010). On the other hand, a significant proportion of MSM-negative cases were found to have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.019). Conclusion Pancreatic cancer-specific methylation marker panel was established to perform MSM analysis. MSM-positive status might represent microscopically undetectable cancer cells on the surgical margin and might influence the postoperative long-term outcomes.

Background/Aim: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) mainly develops in the damaged liver from hepatitis C virus (HCV) or hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in Japan. On the other hand, the occurrence of HCCs derived from the liver without viral infection has recently been increasing. Our aim was to identify characteristics specific to HCCs with virus-infected liver (HCC-BC) or those with non-B- and non-C-infected liver (HCC-NBNC), Patients and Methods: We collected preoperative serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) and Des-Gamma-Carboxy Prothrombin (DCP), also known as PIVKA-II values from surgically resected HCC cases during 1994-2017 in our department. Results: Preoperative serum AFP values of HCC-BC cases (n=284) were higher compared to HCC-NBNC cases (n=88) (p=0.016), whereas serum DCP values of HCC-NBNC cases were higher compared to HCC-BC cases (p

We herein report two cases of Masaoka stage IVa thymoma treated by radical resection via thymothymectomy followed by pleurectomy/decortication (PD). Case 1: a 52-year-old man was diagnosed with a type B1 thymoma. Resection of the right lobe of thymus, dissection of left upper mediastinum, and pleurectomy from anterior chest wall to descending aorta were performed via median sternotomy approach. Pericardial resection followed by decortication of the total visceral pleura was then successfully performed via a posterolateral thoracotomy approach. Case 2: a 48-year-old man was diagnosed with type B2 thymoma. Thymothymectomy and extra-pleural dissection except for the right-side diaphragmatic area were achieved via median sternotomy approach. Resection of the visible disseminated lesions of visceral pleura was performed after pleurectomy of the diaphragmatic area via posterolateral thoracotomy approach. Both patients are disease free at 3 years and 2 years and half, respectively. Extended thymothymectomy followed by PD is a candidate approach for surgical management.

Lysyl oxidase (LOX) family genes, particularly lysyl oxidase-like protein 2 (LOXL2), have been implicated in carcinogenesis, metastasis, and the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in various cancers. This study aimed to explore the clinical implications of LOXL2 expression in pancreatic cancer (PC) in the context of EMT status. LOX family mRNA expression was measured in PC cell lines, and LOXL2 protein levels were examined in surgical specimens resected from 170 patients with PC. Higher LOXL2 expression was observed in cell lines from mesenchymal type PC than in those from epithelial type PC. A significant correlation between LOXL2 expression and the EMT status defined based on the expression of E-cadherin and vimentin was observed in surgical specimens (P P P = 0.03) was a significant independent prognostic factor for patients with PC. Additionally, LOX inhibition significantly decreased PC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro. In conclusion, LOXL2 expression is potentially associated with PC progression, and LOXL2 expression represents a biomarker for predicting the prognosis of patients with PC who have undergone complete resection.

Aim This study aimed to assess the clinical utility of preoperative evaluation of liver fibrosis using platelet-albumin-bilirubin (PALBI) grade, Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), and aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and explore the clinical impact of these models with regard to perioperative risks and HCC prognosis. Methods Between January 2003 and December 2018, 305 consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC were enrolled. Results The APRI showed the most robust diagnostic performance through each fibrosis stage among three models (PALBI, FIB-4, and APRI): fibrosis stage 3 (f3), area under the curve [AUC] = 0.55, 0.72, and 0.76; and f4, AUC = 0.51, 0.71, and 0.76, respectively). In addition, survival analysis revealed that all three models were significantly associated with HCC prognosis. PALBI (grade 1 vs. 2, 3): recurrence-free survival (RFS): median survival time (MST), 34 vs. 17 months, 0.007; overall survival (OS): MST, 115 vs. 68, 0.02. FIB-4 (grade 1, 2 vs. 3): RFS: MST, 34 vs. 22, 0.004, OS: MST, 120 vs. 63, 0.0001. APRI (grade 1, 2 vs. 3), RFS: MST, 30 vs. 20, 0.0005; OS: MST, 107 vs. 55, 0.0003. Among three scoring systems, only PALBI grade was significantly associated with both operative time (median, 303 vs. 340 min, 0.01) and intraoperative blood loss (median, 581 vs. 859 mL, 0.03). Conclusions This study showed robust performances of selected liver reserve and fibrosis models to predict HCC prognosis. Of them, PALBI might be used for assessing perioperative risks for hepatectomy for HCC.

A survival benefit of extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage (EIPL) has been reported in patients with gastric cancer with positive peritoneal cytology. The hypothesis of this study was that EIPL may reduce peritoneal recurrence in patients with advanced gastric cancer who undergo surgery with curative intent.This was an open-label, multi-institutional, randomized, phase 3 trial to assess the effects of EIPL versus standard treatment after curative gastrectomy for resectable gastric cancer of T3 status or above. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival, peritoneal recurrence-free survival and incidence of adverse events.Between July 2011 and January 2014, 314 patients were enrolled from 15 institutions and 295 patients were analysed (145 and 150 in the EIPL and no-EIPL groups respectively). The 3-year DFS rate was 63·9 (95 per cent c.i. 55·5 to 71·2) per cent in the EIPL group and 59·7 (51·3 to 67·1) per cent in the control group (hazard ratio (HR) 0·81, 95 per cent c.i. 0·57 to 1·16; P = 0·249). The 3-year overall survival rate was 75·0 (67·1 to 81·3) per cent in the EIPL group and 73·7 (65·9 to 80·1) per cent in the control group (HR 0·91, 0·60 to 1·37; P = 0·634). Peritoneal recurrence-free survival was not significantly different between the two groups (HR 0·92, 0·62 to 1·36; P = 0·676). No intraoperative complications related to EIPL were observed.EIPL did not improve survival or peritoneal recurrence in patients who underwent gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Registration number: 000005907 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm).Se ha descrito que un lavado peritoneal extenso intraoperatorio (extensive intraoperative peritoneal lavage, EIPL) proporciona un beneficio en la supervivencia en pacientes con cáncer gástrico con citología peritoneal positiva. La hipótesis de este estudio era que el EIPL podría disminuir la recidiva peritoneal en pacientes con cáncer gástrico avanzado sometidos a cirugía con intención curativa. MÉTODOS: Ensayo clínico fase 3, abierto, multicéntrico y aleatorizado para evaluar los efectos de un lavado peritoneal extenso intraoperatorio (EIPL) frente a tratamiento estándar tras gastrectomía curativa por cáncer gástrico ≥T3 resecable. La variable de resultado primaria fue la supervivencia libre de enfermedad (disease-free survival, DFS), y las variables de resultado secundarias fueron la supervivencia global (overall survival, OS), la supervivencia libre de recidiva peritoneal y la incidencia de efectos adversos.Entre julio de 2011 y enero de 2014, se reclutaron 314 pacientes de 15 instituciones y se analizaron los datos de 295 pacientes (145 en el grupo con EIPL y 150 en el grupo sin EIPL). La DFS a los 3 años fue 63,9% (i.c. del 95% 55,5-71,2) en el grupo con EIPL y 59,7% (i.c. del 95% 51,3-67,1) en el grupo control (cociente de riesgos instantáneos, hazard ratio, HR 0,81 (i.c. del 95% 0,57-1,16), P = 0,249). La OS a los 3 años fue 75,0% (i.c. del 95% 67,1-81,3) en el grupo con EIPL y 73,7% (i.c. del 95% 65,9-80,1) en el grupo control (HR 0,91 i.c. del 95% 0,60-1,37), P = 0,634). No se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los dos grupos en la supervivencia libre de recidiva peritoneal (P = 0,676, HR 0,92 (i.c. del 95% 0,62-1,36). No se observaron complicaciones intraoperatorias relacionadas con EIPL. CONCLUSIÓN: El EIPL no mejoró la supervivencia o la recidiva peritoneal en pacientes sometidos a gastrectomía por cáncer gástrico avanzado.

Background and Aim A reliable classification for predicting postoperative prognosis and perioperative risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients is required to make a precise decision for HCC treatment. In the present study, we assessed the perioperative and prognostic importance of indocyanine green (ICG) testing, tumor‐node‐metastasis (TNM) stage, albumin‐bilirubin (ALBI) grade, and ALBI‐TNM (ALBI‐T) score using consecutive resected HCC cases. Methods Between 1998 and 2011, 273 consecutive patients who underwent primary and curative hepatectomy for HCC were identified. Among these 273 cases, 235 Child‐Pugh class A patients were enrolled in the present study. Results Correlation analysis showed that the value of linear predictor for ALBI grade was significantly correlated with ICG 15‐minute retention rates (r = 0.51, P

390 Background: Systemic inflammation and nutrition status are considered to influence survival in cancer patients. A variety of systemic inflammation-based prognostic scores have been explored; however, there has been no study to clarify which score could best reflect survival in resected pancreatic cancer patients. Methods: Between 2002 and 2016, 422 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection of pancreatic cancer were enrolled. The Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), modified GPS (mGPS), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), prognostic index (PI), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) scores for each patients were calculated. Survival of each score was evaluated, and correlations between the score selected on the basis of the prognostic significance and various clinicopathological factors were analyzed. On the other hand, the nutrition markers (pre-albumin, transferrin, and retinol-binding protein) of 30 patients who received the enteral nutrition during the perioperative period were also evaluated. Results: In the analysis of the GPS, the median survival time (MST) was 29.4 months for score 0, 25.5 for score 1, and 17.7 for score 2 ( p< 0.001), and mGPS was also found to be significant ( p= 0.003). On the contrary, there were no significance in MST between other scores (NLR, PLR, PI, or PNI). Multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis, positive peritoneal washing cytology, and a GPS score of 2 were significant prognostic factors. There was also statistically significant correlation between the GPS score and tumor location (head), tumor size ( > 2.0cm), bile duct invasion, and duodenal invasion. In terms of nutrition status, the postoperative nutrition markers of 30 patients managed by enteral nutrition tended to recover earlier than 79 patients managed by intravenous nutrition. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that the GPS could be an independent predictive marker and was superior to other inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. The results also suggested that perioperative nutrition support and infection control would improve survival of pancreatic cancer patients.

The standard of care for stage II/III gastric cancer in Japan is D2 dissection followed by adjuvant S-1 monotherapy. Outcome of patients with stage III disease remains unsatisfactory, calling for a more intensive adjuvant chemotherapy regimen, for which evidence in advanced/metastatic cancer research suggests S-1/cisplatin (CDDP) as a candidate. Although S-1/CDDP was poorly tolerated postoperatively in the previous trial, compliance was dramatically improved by insertion of one cycle of S-1 monotherapy, which delayed administration of CDDP by 6 weeks.A feasibility study of post-gastrectomy S-1/CDDP was performed. Patients with stage III/IV gastric cancer were eligible. The first cycle of chemotherapy consisted of S-1 monotherapy, and intensive antiemetic drugs were prescribed when patients were administered CDDP. The primary endpoint was the completion rate of four cycles of S-1/CDDP. The secondary endpoints were the relative dose intensity, safety, progression-free survival time and overall survival time. Several criteria to skip, postpone or reduce the dose had been predetermined.Between 2010 and 2011, 33 patients were enrolled. Four patients had stage IIIA disease, 7 patients had stage IIIB disease, 11 patients had stage IIIC disease, and 11 patients had stage IV disease. The completion rate of the protocol treatment was 60.6%. The relative dose intensity of S-1 was 77.3% and that of CDDP was 72.3%.The protocol-specified delay in the administration of CDDP dramatically improved the relative drug intensity in the postoperative adjuvant setting, although the completion rate did not reach the expected level.

e15039 Background: Gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy is one of standards for treatment of gastric cancer (GC). Postoperative malnutrition is deemed inevitable, however, and...

636 Background: KRAS status is the therapeutic marker of anti-EGFR drug, and may be the prognostic marker of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, there is no consensus whether bevacizumab (anti-VEGF drug) benefits patients with mutated KRAS in mCRC. We investigated the clinical benefits of bevacizumab treatment in mCRC depending on KRAS status, retrospectively. Methods: We investigated 49 patients who received chemotherapies with bevacizumab as first-line treatment for mCRC from May 2008 through June 2013. We evaluated response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), tumor reduction rate and the adverse events (CTCAE v4.0 - JCOG) depending on KRAS status. Results: The median age of the patients was 66 years (range; 36 - 80). Forty-five patients received oxaliplatin-based chemotherapies with bevacizumab and four patients received irinotecan-based chemotherapies with bevacizumab. KRAS status of 30 patients was wild type and that of 19 patients was mutation type. There was no difference in patient characteristics between KRAS wild type (WT) and mutation type (MT). In all 49 patients, RR was 62.5%. DCR was 91.7%. The median PFS was 10.9 months. In RR, patients with KRAS wild type tumors had better outcome than patients with mutant type tumors (WT : MT, 69.0% : 52.6%, no statistically difference). A similar tendency was seen in DCR (WT : MT, 96.6% : 84.2%, no statistically difference). The average reduction rate in KRAS WT was 42.7% and in KRAS MT was 32.3% (p = 0.309). In the KRAS wild patients, the median PFS was longer than that in the KRAS mutant patients (WT : MT, 11.8 : 8.9 months, Log Rank p = 0.583), but there is no statistically difference between two groups. In median OS, there was no difference between two groups (WT : MT, 21.0 : 20.8 months, Log Rank p = 0.393). The incidence of severe adverse events was not statistically different between KRAS WT group and MT group. Conclusions: Regardless of KRAS status, bevacizumab provides clinical benefits for patients with mCRC.