Search

Introduction: Patients (pts) with CLL may be at particular risk of severe COVID-19 given advanced age and immune dysregulation. Two large series with limited follow-up have reported outcomes for pts with CLL and COVID-19 (Scarfò, et al. Leukemia 2020; Mato, et al. Blood 2020). To provide maximal clarity on outcomes for pts with CLL and COVID-19, we partnered in a worldwide effort to describe the clinical experience and validate predictors of survival, including potential treatment effects. Methods: This international collaboration represents a partnership between investigators at 141 centers. Data are presented in two cohorts. Cohort 1 (Co1) includes pts captured through efforts by European Research Initiative on CLL (ERIC), Italian CAMPUS CLL Program, and Grupo Español de Leucemia Linfática Crónica. The validation cohort, Cohort 2 (Co2), includes pts from US (66%), UK (23%), EU (7%), and other countries (4%). There is no overlap in cases between cohorts. CLL pts were included if COVID-19 was diagnosed by PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 and they required inpatient hospitalization. Data were collected retrospectively 2/2020 - 5/2020 using standardized case report forms. Baseline characteristics, preexisting comorbidities (including cumulative illness rating scale (CIRS) score ≥6 vs. The primary endpoint of this study was to estimate the case fatality rate (CFR), defined as the proportion of pts who died among all pts hospitalized with COVID-19. Chi-squared test was used to compare frequencies; univariable and multivariable analyses utilized Cox regression. Predictors of inferior OS in both Co1 and Co2 were included in multivariable analyses. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) from time of COVID-19 diagnosis (dx). Results: 411 hospitalized, COVID-19 positive CLL pts were analyzed (Co1 n=281, Co2 n=130). Table 1 describes baseline characteristics. At COVID-19 dx, median age was 72 in Co1 (range 37-94) and 68 in Co2 (range 41-98); 31% (Co1) and 45% (Co2) had CIRS ≥6. In Co1, 48% were treatment-naïve and 26% were receiving CLL-directed therapy at COVID-19 dx (66% BTKi ± anti-CD20, 19% Venetoclax ± anti-CD20, 9.6% chemo/chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), 1.4% PI3Ki, 4% other). In Co2, 36% were never treated and 49% were receiving CLL-directed therapy (65% BTKi ± anti-CD20, 19% Venetoclax ± anti-CD20, 9.4% multi-novel agent combinations, 1.6% CIT, 1.6% PI3Ki, 1.6% anti-CD20 monotherapy, 1.6% other). Most pts receiving CLL-directed therapy had it held at COVID-19 diagnosis (93% in Co1 and 81% in Co2). Frequency of most COVID-19 symptoms/laboratory abnormalities were similar in the two cohorts including fever (88% in both), lymphocytosis (ALC ≥30 x 109/L; 27% vs. 21%), and lymphocytopenia (ALC < 1.0 x 109/L; 18% vs. 28%), while others varied between Co1 and Co2 (p Median follow-up was 24 days (range 2-86) in Co1 and 17 days (1-43) in Co2. CFRs were similar in Co1 and Co2, 30% and 34% (p=0.45). 54% and 43% were discharged while 16% and 23% remained admitted at last follow-up in Co1 and Co2, respectively. The proportion of pts requiring supplemental oxygen was similar (89% vs. 92%) while rate of ICU admission was higher in Co2 (20% vs. 48%, p Conclusions : In the largest cancer dx-specific cohort reported, pts with CLL hospitalized for COVID-19 had a CFR of 30-34%. Advanced patient age at COVID-19 diagnosis was an independent predictor of OS in two large cohorts. This CFR will serve as a benchmark for mortality for future outcomes studies, including therapeutic interventions for COVID-19 in this population. The effect of CLL treatment on OS was inconsistent across cohorts; COVID-19 may be severe regardless of treatment status. While there were no significant differences in distribution of current lines of therapy between cohorts, prior chemo exposure was more common in Co1 vs. Co2, which may account for difference in OS. Extended follow-up will be presented. Disclosures Roeker: American Society of Hematology: Research Funding; Abbott Laboratories: Other: spouse with minority ownership interest ; AbbVie: Other: spouse with minority ownership interest . Scarfo:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Abrisqueta:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Eyre:AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support; KITE, AZ, Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Muntañola Prat:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants; participated in advisory boards; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants; participated in advisory boards; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants; participated in advisory boards. Villacampa:AstraZeneca: Other: advisory role; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Honoraria. Leslie:AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BeiGene: Speakers Bureau; KitePharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Epizyme: Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Allan:Acerta, Genentech, Abbvie, Sunesis, Ascentage, Pharmacyclics, Janssen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene: Consultancy; Celgene, Genentech, Janssen, TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Abbvie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Pharmacyclics: Honoraria. Furman:Incyte: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy; Oncotarget: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy. Pagel:BeiGene, Astrazeneca, Loxo Oncology, Gilead: Consultancy. Hernandez-Rivas:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rovi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Patel:Genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BeiGene: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Motta:Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Lamanna:AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; Verastem: Research Funding; Bei-Gene: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche-Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vitale:Janssen: Honoraria. Kamdar:Roche: Research Funding. Österborg:BeiGene: Research Funding; Kancera: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Karolinska Univeristy Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden: Current Employment. Hanson:Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria. Eichhorst:ArQule: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Oxford Biomedica: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding. Reda:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Varettoni:Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; AbbVie: Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Marchetti:Gilead: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Other: Sponsored meetings; Takeda: Other: Sponsored meetings; Pfeizer: Other: Sponsored meetings. Munir:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Other: Medical writing support, furnished by Scott Battle, PhD, of Health Interactions, was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland; Alexion: Honoraria. Zabalza:Janssen: Honoraria, Other: travel grants; Roche: Other: travel grants; Novartis: Other: travel grants. Janssens:Amgen: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; speaker fees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; speaker fees; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; speaker fees; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; speaker fees; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; speaker fees; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; speaker fees; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; speaker fees; Roche: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; speaker fees. Niemann:AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sunesis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Danish Cancer Society: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk Foundation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Perini:Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Speakers Bureau. Patten:AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria. Marasca:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Honoraria. Iyengar:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Ferrari:Abbvie: Honoraria. El-Sharkawi:Roche: Other: Conference fees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Itchaki:Abbvie Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ma:Novartis: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bioverativ: Consultancy, Honoraria; BeiGene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Van Der Spek:AMGEN: Other: Teaching activities. Seymour:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen/Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Rigolin:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Mauro:Roche: Other; Octopharma: Other; Takeda-Shire: Other; Gilead: Other; Janssen: Other; Abbvie: Other. Laurenti:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Levin:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel compensation; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel compensation; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel compensation. Špaček:Gilead: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Walewska:AbbVie: Other: sponsored for educational meetings, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Other: sponsored for educational meetings, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wiestner:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company; Acerta, Merck, Nurix, Verastem, and Genmab: Research Funding; National Institutes of Health: Patents & Royalties: and other intellectual property. Broom:Gilead: Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau. Kater:Abbvie: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Ujjani:AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Verastem Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Atara: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; MorphoSys: Consultancy. Vandenberghe:Celgene: Other: sponsorship to attend Lugano lymphoma meeting in 2019; Gilead: Other: travel grants, Research Funding; Abbvie: Other: travel grants, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: travel grants; Roche: Other: travel grants, Research Funding. Chong:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tessa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KITE Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pu:Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Brown:Janssen, Teva: Speakers Bureau; Gilead, Loxo, Sun, Verastem: Research Funding; Abbvie, Acerta, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Invectys, Juno/Celgene, Kite, Morphosys, Novartis, Octapharma, Pharmacyclics, Sunesis, TG Therapeutics, Verastem: Consultancy. Trentin:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Honoraria. Farina:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sanchez:Abbvie: Other: travel grants; Amgem: Other: travel grants; Janssen: Other: travel grants; Celgene: Other: travel grants; Roche: Other: travel grants. Shadman:Abbvie, Genentech, Astra Zeneca, Sound Biologics , Pharmacyclics, Verastem, ADC therapeutics, Beigene, Cellectar, BMS, Morphosys and Atara Biotherapeutics: Consultancy; Mustang Bio, Celgene, Pharmacyclics, Gilead, Genentech, Abbvie, TG therapeutics, Beigene, Astra Zeneca, Sunesis, Beigene: Research Funding. Foglietta:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Jaksic:Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Sportoletti:AbbVie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Barr:Morphosys: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; TG therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie/Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Ruchlemer:Abbvie Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kersting:Celgene: Other: travel grant; Janssen: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Huntington:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; DTRM: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astrazeneca: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Herishanu:Roche: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Medison: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria. Jacobs:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi Genzyme: Speakers Bureau. Portell:BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Rambaldi:Sanofi: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Astellas: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); University of Milan: Current Employment; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support. Received travel support., Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support from Gilead.; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company). Research grant from Amgen Inc.; Omeros: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company). Advisory board and speaker fees from Pfizer.. Brander:Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; NCCN: Other; Novartis: Consultancy, Other; Teva: Consultancy, Honoraria; Tolero: Research Funding; NCCN: Other; Novartis: Consultancy, Other; Teva: Consultancy, Honoraria; Tolero: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding; ArQule: Consultancy, Other, Research Funding; Ascentage: Other, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; BeiGene: Other, Research Funding; DTRM: Other, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Juno/Celgene/BMS: Other, Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Other, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding. Rossi:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Coscia:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Coombs:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; MEI Pharma: Honoraria; LOXO Oncology: Honoraria; Octapharma: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Schuster:Novartis, Genentech, Inc./ F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; AlloGene, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Genentech, Inc./ F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Juno/Celgene, Loxo Oncology, Nordic Nanovector, Novartis, Tessa Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria. Foà:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Cuneo:Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Bosch:Jansen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Stamatopoulos:AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Janssen, Gilead, Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ghia:Adaptive, Dynamo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; Celgene/Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lilly: Consultancy, Honoraria; MEI: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; ArQule: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mato:Adaptive: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy; LOXO: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: DSMB, Research Funding.

Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) may be more susceptible to Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to age, disease, and treatment-related immunosuppression. We aimed to assess risk factors of outcome and elucidate the impact of CLL-directed treatments on the course of COVID-19. We conducted a retrospective, international study, collectively including 941 patients with CLL and confirmed COVID-19. Data from the beginning of the pandemic until March 16, 2021, were collected from 91 centers. The risk factors of case fatality rate (CFR), disease severity, and overall survival (OS) were investigated. OS analysis was restricted to patients with severe COVID-19 (definition: hospitalization with need of oxygen or admission into an intensive care unit). CFR in patients with severe COVID-19 was 38.4%. OS was inferior for patients in all treatment categories compared to untreated (p

Background: Patients with cancer are considered highly vulnerable to the recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, there are still few data on COVID-19 occurring in hematologic patients. Methods: One hundred two patients with COVID-19 symptoms and a nasopharyngeal swab positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 seen at 2 hematologic departments located in Lombardy, Italy, during March 2020 were studied. Risk factors for acquiring COVID-19 were analyzed by comparisons of patients with COVID-19 and the standard hematologic population managed at the same institutions in 2019. Thirty-day survival was compared with the survival of matched uninfected control patients with similar hematologic disorders and nonhematologic patients affected by COVID-19. Results: Male sex was significantly more prevalent in patients with COVID-19. The infection occurred across all different types of hematologic disease; however, the risk of acquiring a COVID-19 infection was lower for patients with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms, including chronic myeloid leukemia, and higher for patients with immune-mediated anemia on immunosuppressive-related treatments. The 30-day mortality rate was 39.2%, which was higher than the rates for nonhematologic patients with COVID-19 (23.5%; P =.02) and uninfected hematologic controls (3%; P

Patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) lacking activating mutations in the MYD88 gene (MYD88WT) have demonstrated relatively poor outcomes to ibrutinib monotherapy, with no major responses reported in a phase 2 pivotal study. Zanubrutinib is a novel, selective Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor designed to maximize BTK occupancy and minimize off-target activity. The ASPEN study consisted of a randomized comparison of zanubrutinib and ibrutinib efficacy and safety in patients with WM who have the MYD88 mutation, as well as a separate cohort of patients without MYD88 mutation (MYD88WT) or with unknown mutational status who received zanubrutinib. Results from the latter single-arm cohort are reported herein. Efficacy endpoints included overall, major and complete (CR) or very good partial response (VGPR) rates, progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS). Twenty-eight patients (23 relapsed/refractory; 5 treatment-naïve) were enrolled, including 26 with centrally confirmed MYD88WT disease and 2 with unknown MYD88 mutational status. At a median follow-up of 17.9 months, 7 of 26 MYD88WT patients (27%) had achieved a VGPR and 50% a major response (partial response or better); there were no CRs. At 18 months, the estimated PFS and OS rates were 68% and 88%, respectively, while the median DOR had not been reached. Two patients discontinued zanubrutinib due to adverse events. Treatment-emergent hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and major hemorrhages were reported in 3, 1 and 2 patients (including 1 concurrent with enoxaparin therapy), respectively. Results of this substudy demonstrate that zanubrutinib monotherapy can induce high quality responses in patients with MYD88WT WM. This trial is registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT #03053440.

Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibition is an effective treatment approach for patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). The phase 3 ASPEN study compared the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib, a first-generation BTK inhibitor, with zanubrutinib, a novel highly selective BTK inhibitor, in patients with WM. Patients with MYD88L265P disease were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment with ibrutinib or zanubrutinib. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving a complete response (CR) or a very good partial response (VGPR) by independent review. Key secondary end points included major response rate (MRR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), disease burden, and safety. A total of 201 patients were randomized, and 199 received ≥1 dose of study treatment. No patient achieved a CR. Twenty-nine (28%) zanubrutinib patients and 19 (19%) ibrutinib patients achieved a VGPR, a nonstatistically significant difference (P = .09). MRRs were 77% and 78%, respectively. Median DOR and PFS were not reached; 84% and 85% of ibrutinib and zanubrutinib patients were progression free at 18 months. Atrial fibrillation, contusion, diarrhea, peripheral edema, hemorrhage, muscle spasms, and pneumonia, as well as adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation, were less common among zanubrutinib recipients. Incidence of neutropenia was higher with zanubrutinib, although grade ≥3 infection rates were similar in both arms (1.2 and 1.1 events per 100 person-months). These results demonstrate that zanubrutinib and ibrutinib are highly effective in the treatment of WM, but zanubrutinib treatment was associated with a trend toward better response quality and less toxicity, particularly cardiovascular toxicity.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a disease of the elderly, characterized by immunodeficiency. Hence, patients with CLL might be considered more susceptible to severe complications from COVID-19. We undertook this retrospective international multicenter study to characterize the course of COVID-19 in patients with CLL and identify potential predictors of outcome. Of 190 patients with CLL and confirmed COVID-19 diagnosed between 28/03/2020 and 22/05/2020, 151 (79%) presented with severe COVID-19 (need of oxygen and/or intensive care admission). Severe COVID-19 was associated with more advanced age (≥65 years) (odds ratio 3.72 [95% CI 1.79–7.71]). Only 60 patients (39.7%) with severe COVID-19 were receiving or had recent (≤12 months) treatment for CLL at the time of COVID-19 versus 30/39 (76.9%) patients with mild disease. Hospitalization rate for severe COVID-19 was lower (p < 0.05) for patients on ibrutinib versus those on other regimens or off treatment. Of 151 patients with severe disease, 55 (36.4%) succumbed versus only 1/38 (2.6%) with mild disease; age and comorbidities did not impact on mortality. In CLL, (1) COVID-19 severity increases with age; (2) antileukemic treatment (particularly BTK inhibitors) appears to exert a protective effect; (3) age and comorbidities did not impact on mortality, alluding to a relevant role of CLL and immunodeficiency.

We analyzed 160 young Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM) patients with a median age of 49 years (range 23-55 years), diagnosed between January 2000 and January 2019 in 14 Italian centers. At diagnosis, 70% of patients were asymptomatic. With a median follow-up of 5.6 years, 57% have been treated. As initial therapy 79% of patients received chemo-immunotherapy, 13% a chemo-free induction and 8% chemotherapy only. At relapse or progression, 6% underwent an autologous stem cell transplantation. Overall, 19% of patients received ibrutinib during the course of the disease. According to IPSSWM, 63% were classified as low risk, 27% as intermediate risk and 10% as high risk. Five-year OS was shorter in high-risk as compared with low or intermediate risk patients (92.9% vs 100% P = .002). According to revised IPSSWM, 92% were classified as very low or low risk and 8% as intermediate risk, with a shorter 5-year OS in the latter group (87.5% vs 100%, P = .028). The OS of young WM patients was not significantly reduced as compared with age-matched, sex-matched and calendar year-matched general population. Early diagnosis, absence of high-risk features in symptomatic patients and high efficacy of modern treatments are the main determinants of the excellent outcome of young WM patients.

// Antonio Sacco 1 , Adriano Fenotti 2 , Loredana Affo 2 , Stefano Bazzana 3 , Domenico Russo 4 , Marco Presta 5 , Michele Malagola 4 , Antonella Anastasia 6 , Marina Motta 6 , Christopher J. Patterson 7 , Giuseppe Rossi 6 , Luisa Imberti 1 , Steven P. Treon 7 , Irene M. Ghobrial 7 and Aldo M. Roccaro 1 1 ASST Spedali Civili, Coordinamento e Progettazione Ricerca Clinica, CREA Laboratory, Brescia, BS, Italy 2 ASST Spedali Civili, SITRA, Brescia, BS, Italy 3 ASST Spedali Civili, Collegio IPASVI, Brescia, BS, Italy 4 University of Brescia Medical School, Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Brescia, BS, Italy 5 University of Brescia Medical School, Dept. of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Brescia, BS, Italy 6 ASST Spedali Civili, Dept. of Hematology, Brescia, BS, Italy 7 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dept. Medical Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Correspondence to: Aldo M. Roccaro, email: // Keywords : Waldenstrom’s Macrolobulinemia, genomics Received : November 17, 2016 Accepted : February 20, 2017 Published : March 11, 2017 Abstract The Literature has recently reported on the importance of genomics in the field of hematologic malignancies, including B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders such as Waldenstrom’s Macrolgobulinemia (WM). Particularly, whole exome sequencing has led to the identification of the MYD88 L265P and CXCR4 C1013G somatic variants in WM, occurring in about 90% and 30% of the patients, respectively. Subsequently, functional studies have demonstrated their functional role in supporting WM pathogenesis and disease progression, both in vitro and in vivo , thus providing the pre-clinical evidences for extremely attractive targets for novel therapeutic interventions in WM. Of note, recent evidences have also approached and defined the transcriptome profiling of WM cells, revealing a signature that mirrors the somatic aberrations demonstrated within the tumor clone. A parallel research field has also reported on microRNAs (miRNAs), highlighting the oncogenic role of miRNA-155 in WM. In the present review, we focus on the latest reports on genomics and miRNAs in WM, providing an overview of the clinical relevance of the latest acquired knowledge about genomics and miRNA aberrations in WM.

The treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been radically changed in the last years thanks to the targeted therapies, including kinase (i.e. ibrutinib) and BCL2 (i.e. venetoclax) inhibitors. Venetoclax (VEN) in particular is able to obtain undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD), though only in a proportion of patients (pts) when given as single agent, thus warranting the need of different strategies in those not achieving uMRD. We designed a phase 2 multicenter Italian study where ibrutinib (IBR) is added to VEN based on a MRD-driven strategy aiming at obtaining uMRD and discontinuing both treatments in pts who did not achieve uMRD with VEN mono. Study treatment started with VEN (ramp up to 400 mg/day as per current label) for 12 months. MRD status in peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) was evaluated using the 6-color flow cytometry assay recommended by ERIC (CD5/CD81/CD79b/CD19/CD43/CD20). Pts with uMRD in both PB and BM at C12D1 discontinued VEN at C12D28 and entered the follow-up phase. Pts with detectable MRD in PB and/or BM added IBR 420 mg/day starting from C13D1 and continued both drugs up to maximum C24D28, uMRD, progression or unacceptable toxicity (whichever occurs first). After C24D28, pts with detectable MRD and still in response continued IBR alone. The primary endpoint was uMRD4 ( Thirty-eight pts (recruited from Nov 2017 to Jul 2018) fulfilled eligibility and started VEN. Baseline characteristics included: median number of prior therapies 1 (range 1-4) (60.6% previously treated with FCR or FC); del(17p) in 8/33 (24%); TP53 mutations in 10/30 (33%), and unmutated IGHV in 24/30 (80%). At the data cut-off, 35/38 evaluable pts still in the study have reached C24D1, 1 pt discontinued treatment due to myelodisplasia (considered unrelated to study treatment) before C12D1 and 1 pt progressed on VEN monotherapy shortly before that timepoint, 1 evaluation is still missing due to COVID-19 restrictions. At C12D1, uMRD4 in PB was achieved in 19/38 (50%) pts (Figure 1), 17/19 (89.5%) had uMRD4 confirmed in BM. Overall response rate with VEN single-agent was 36/38 (94.7%), 9 CR and 27 PR. As per protocol, the 17 pts (45%) with uMRD4 in PB and BM at C12D1 discontinued VEN at C12D28. Nineteen responsive cases with detectable MRD at C12D1 added IBR to VEN starting from C13D1. The combination of IBR and VEN led to an improved reduction of the depth of MRD in all but 3 pts with 16/19 (84%) achieving uMRD4 in both PB and BM between C16D1 (first MRD assessment after starting IBR) and C24D1, thus stopping both therapies as per protocol. After a median follow-up of 25.4 months (range 6.1-33.5) from treatment initiation, no clinical progression was observed among those discontinuing treatment in uMRD, while MRD4 relapse occurred in 21/33. Median time to MRD4 relapse in those who achieved uMRD at any timepoint and discontinued treatment was 4 months (range 2-13). Twelve pts (6 treated with VEN only) remain uMRD after stopping treatment, with a median observation of 13 months (range 3+-18+) since confirmed uMRD4. Safety data were analyzed in the intention-to-treat cohort (39 pts). No cases of clinical tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) and/or biochemical TLS were reported in the 39 pts exposed to VEN. Adverse events (AEs) were mild, with no treatment discontinuations or dose reductions. Five Serious AEs (Table 1) and 130 AEs (Table 2) occurred in 28 patients, without any SUSARs. All 5 SAEs were deemed unrelated to study drug(s) and 4/5 have resolved without sequelae. In conclusion, we here present the updated results of our study including the combination phase of VEN with IBR. This sequential MRD-guided approach was feasible and led to deeper responses in about 85% of pts not achieving uMRD4 after VEN alone. With this tailored and time-limited strategy 33 out of 38 pts (87%) obtained uMRD4 in PB and BM either after VEN monotherapy or the IBR-VEN combination, indicating we may reach identical depth of response with a personalized intensification and avoid unnecessary drug exposure. Time to clinical progression and response to VEN retreatment in this cohort remain to be established as well as the biological characteristics of those pts with persistent MRD despite the combined treatment. Updated results with further sequential MRD and clinical monitoring after treatment discontinuation will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Scarfo: Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Farina:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gaidano:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astrazeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Reda:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Coscia:Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding. Laurenti:Roche: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria. Varettoni:Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses. Ghia:Lilly: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Adaptive, Dynamo: Consultancy, Honoraria; MEI: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene/Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; ArQule: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is a rare lymphoproliferative disease with specific morphologic and molecular features and excellent prognosis. Although high rate of complete response (CR) has been reported after treatment with purine analogs, expecially cladribine (2CDA), relapse may occur during follow-up. The aim of the study is to review the efficacy, safety, long term remission rate and overall survival (OS) in those patients (pts) that received 2CDA as first line treatment. We retrospectively reviewed data of all HCL pts treated with 2CDA between March 1991 and May 2019 at 18 Italian Hematological centers. Among 553 pts reported, only 513 were evaluable because treated with 2CDA alone. Considering the clinical carachteristics, M/F ratio was 4.5 with a median age of 54 years (range 24-88) and ECOG 0 in 85% of cases. Splenomegaly and presence of circulating hairy cells recorded by morphology were reported in 241 (47%) and 138 (27%) pts, respectively. Thirty-seven (7%) pts presented with an infection. Other comorbidities were cardiovascular in 29 (6%) pts, a previous cancer or diabetes in 27 (5%) each, chronic hepatic disorders in 18 (3%), obstructive pulmonary disease in 16 (3%), chronic kidney disease in 3 (1%). Three hundred-thirty (64%) pts received 2CDA intravenously (253 as daily continuous infusion for 5-7 consecutive days and 77 as weekly infusion for 5-7 consecutive weeks) and 183 (36%) subcutaneously. Response criteria were defined as per recent consensus guidelines (Grever MR et al. Blood 2017). The overall response rate (ORR) was 83%: CR in 335 pts (65%) and partial response (PR) in 96 (19%); 40 (8%) pts obtained hematological improvement (HI) and in 42 (8%) no response was observed. Nine of 11 (82%) pts with HI and 18/25 (72%) non responders who received salvage therapy obtained a major response (fig. 1). A slightly higher hemoglobin value (12.4 vs 11.4 g/dl, p=0.044), a reduced frequency of circulating hairy cells (28.7% vs 31.8%, p=0.039), absence of palpable splenomegaly (p= 2CDA is greatly effective in treating HCL, with an ORR of 83%. Early and long term adverse events were rare and easily managed: although HCL-related mortality is still possible, OS at 15 years is higher than 80% Disclosures Motta: Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Offidani:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria. Tedeschi:Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sunesis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Beigene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Trentin:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Honoraria. Varettoni:Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses. Visentin:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Falini:Roche: Research Funding. Pulsoni:Sandoz: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merk: Consultancy. Tiacci:Roche: Research Funding; Abbvie: Other: Travel and meeting expenses. Zinzani:Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kirin Kyowa: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Eusapharma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Immune Design: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

The human fibroblast growth factor/fibroblast growth factor-receptor (FGF/FGFR) axis deregulation is largely involved in supporting the pathogenesis of hematologic malignancies, including Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (WM). Therefore, novel therapeutics designed to specifically target deregulated signaling pathways in WM are required. We investigated the role of FGF/FGFR system blockade in WM by using a pan-FGF trap molecule, NSC12, a small molecule identified using pharmacophore modeling of the interaction of a minimal PTX3-derived FGF-binding pentapeptide with FGF2. By interrogating the transcriptome signature of patients' BM-derived CD19-positive cells (GEO9656, GEO6691), we found a significant enrichment of FGF/FGFR-driven signaling cascades, including PI3K-AKT, MAPK and STAT3 pathways (FDR In addition, the NSC12-dependent inhibition of MYD88 resulted in silencing of the MAPK-ERK signaling cascade, thus leading to NSC12-induced Myc-silencing in WM cells. We next confirmed the efficacy of NSC12 in silencing bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC)-induced FGFR3 phosphorylation; paralleled by inhibition of of pro-survival pathways, including pAKT, the AKT-downstream pGSK3β; p-ERK; and p-STAT3. Functional sequelae of the FGF/FGFR blockade in WM cells were studied, demonstrating inhibition of WM cell growth, induction of apoptosis, enhanced ER stress and initiation of UPR. Of note, anti-WM activity of NSC12 was also documented using primary bone marrow-derived CD19+ cells isolated from patients with WM. In contrast, NSC12 did not show cytotoxicity on PBMC-derived CD19+ cells isolated from healthy donors. The anti-WM activity exerted by NSC12 was confirmed also within the context of the supportive bone marrow milieu, as shown both in vitro and in vivo. BCWM.1, MWCL1 cells were cultured with NSC12 in the presence or absence of primary WM BMSCs: adherence of WM cells to BMSCs triggered a significant increase in the proliferation, which was inhibited by NSC12in a dose-dependent manner (P Overall, our studies are reporting on the use of NSC12, as a novel potential therapeutic strategy to specifically halt the FGF/FGFR axis in WM; and demonstrate how the observed anti-WM activity exerted by NSC12 may be driven, at least in part, by inhibition of MYD88. Disclosures Motta: Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Rossi:Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roccaro:Amgen: Other; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Other; Janssen: Other; Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC): Research Funding; Transcan2-ERANET: Research Funding; European Hematology Association: Research Funding.

BIRC3 is a recurrently mutated gene in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) but the functional implications of BIRC3 mutations are largely unexplored. Furthermore, little is known about the prognostic impact of BIRC3 mutations in CLL cohorts homogeneously treated with first-line fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR). By immunoblotting analysis, we showed that the non-canonical nuclear factor-κB pathway is active in BIRC3-mutated cell lines and in primary CLL samples, as documented by the stabilization of MAP3K14 and by the nuclear localization of p52. In addition, BIRC3-mutated primary CLL cells are less sensitive to flu-darabine. In order to confirm in patients that BIRC3 mutations confer resistance to fludarabine-based chemoimmunotherapy, a retrospective multicenter cohort of 287 untreated patients receiving first-line FCR was analyzed by targeted next-generation sequencing of 24 recurrently mutated genes in CLL. By univariate analysis adjusted for multiple comparisons BIRC3 mutations identify a poor prognostic subgroup of patients in whom FCR treatment fails (median progression-free survival: 2.2 years, P

Introduction. Observational, real-life studies are relevant to understand whether data derived from prospective controlled trials (CTs) are reproducible in the day-to-day clinical practice. Within a named patient program (NPP), free and early access to ibrutinib was made available for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) until this agent was approved in Italy. To define the efficacy and toxicity profile of patients treated with ibrutinib in this real-life setting, the GIMEMA (Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto) group carried out a retrospective analysis on the outcome of R/R patients with CLL who received ibrutinib in the NPP. Methods. Between April 2014 and January 2015, 216 R/R patients with CLL managed at 20 centers in Italy were included in the NPP. Patients were required to have R/R disease with disease progression within 24 months after prior chemo-immunotherapy. All patients received ibrutinib at the standard dose of 420 mg daily, continuously until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The period of observation included the duration of the NPP and was extended up to January 2016 for patients still on treatment with the commercial drug. Clinical data were reported retrospectively by the treating physicians using the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) system. Results. The median age of patients was 58.3 years (range 27.5-81); 89% of patients were in Binet stage B-C. The median number of prior treatments was 3 (range 1-14). Thirty-seven % of patients was refractory to prior treatment. Deletion 17p and/or TP53 mutations were found in 54% of patients and deletion 11q in 11.6%. Seventy-eight % of patients had an unmutated IGHV gene profile. Prior atrial fibrillation (AF) was reported in 13 cases (6%), while 7 patients with AF (3.3%) were on anti-arrythmic treatment. Hypertension was recorded in 76 cases (35.2%). The median follow-up of patients was 24 months (range, 1-24 months. A response to ibrutinib was observed in 172 patients (79.6%) with a clinical CR/CRi in 34 (15.7%) and a PR/PR-L in 138 (63.9%). Similar response rates were observed in patients with an unmutated IGHV gene status (82.1%) and in those with deletion 17p/TP53 mutations (79.6%). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 24 months were 64.6% (95%CI: 58.0-71.9) and 72.7% (95%CI: 66.5-79.4), respectively. No differences in PFS and OS were observed according to the IGHV mutational status (IGHV unmutated vs mutated: PFS, 65.2% vs 61.0%; p=0.7; OS, 65.2% vs 72.0%, p=0.6) and the presence of TP53 aberrations (TP53 aberrations, present vs absent: PFS, 64.8% vs 64.1%; p=0.6; OS, 69.8% vs 72.7%; p=0.8). Forty-eight patients (22.2%) discontinued ibrutinib within 12 months and 22 (10.2%) within 12-24 months from the start of ibrutinib. Progressive disease and Richter syndrome were the most common reasons for discontinuation that accounted for 16.2% (35 patients) and 1.8% (4 patients) of cases, respectively, and occurred after a median of 17 months from the start of ibrutinib. Treatment discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs) were recorded in 25 patients (11.6%) after a median time of 6 months from the start of treatment and included infections/febrile events in 7 cases, bleeding events in 3 (intracranial hemorrhage 1), sudden death in 3, acute myocardial infarction in 1, ischemic stroke in 2, second malignancy in 3, diarrhea in 1. AF occurred during treatment in 14 (6.5%) patients and was the reason of ibrutinib discontinuation in 2. AEs leading to discontinuation was not specified in 3 cases. Other reasons for ibrutinib discontinuation in 6 (2.8%) patients were ASCT in 4, unplanned surgery in 1, unknown in 1. Survival probability at 12 months from treatment discontinuation due to AEs or DP/RS was 38.2 and 37.2 months respectively (p= 0.6). Conclusions. The results of this real-life study show that in unselected patients with R/R CLL the clinical activity of ibrutinib was comparable to that reported in CTs. However, a third of patients discontinued ibrutinib within 24 months from the start of treatment. An earlier introduction of ibrutinib in the treatment approach of R/R patients, a careful surveillance and management of toxicities will optimise the clinical benefits of ibrutinib in CLL patients treated in the clinical practice. Disclosures Mauro: Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Zinzani:TG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Speakers Bureau; MSD: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; SERVIER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; TG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cortelezzi:novartis: Consultancy; roche: Consultancy; abbvie: Consultancy; janssen: Consultancy. Carlo-Stella:AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Boehringher Ingelheim Italia: Consultancy; Genenta Science: Speakers Bureau; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; MSD Italia: Speakers Bureau. Molica:Roche: Other: Advisory board; Gilead: Other: Advisory board; Jansen: Other: Advisory board; AbbVie: Other: Advisory board. Coscia:Janssen, Karyopharm: Research Funding; Abbvie, Gilead, Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zaja:Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Gaidano:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gobbi:Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy; Pfister: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cuneo:janssen: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau. Foà:JANSSEN: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Speakers Bureau; ROCHE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; ABBVIE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; AMGEN: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; CELTRION: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; GILEAD: Speakers Bureau; CELGENE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; INCYTE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD.

We hereby report the clinical and biologic features of 33 of 4680 (0.7%) patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), managed at 10 Italian centers, who developed Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), a rare variant of Richter syndrome. The median age at CLL and at HL diagnosis were 61 years (range 41-80) and 70 years (range 46-82), respectively, with a median interval from CLL to the diagnosis of HL of 90 months (range 0-258). In 3 cases, CLL and HL were diagnosed simultaneously. Hl was characterized by advanced stage in 79% of cases, International Prognostic Score (IPS) ≥4 in 50%, extranodal involvement in 39%, B symptoms in 70%. Prior treatment for CLL had been received by 82% of patients and included fludarabine in 67%. Coexistence of CLL and HL was detected in the same bioptic tissue in 87% of cases. The most common administered treatment was the ABVD regimen given to 22 patients (66.6%). The complete response (CR) rate after ABVD was 68%, and was influenced by the IPS (P = .03) and interval from the last CLL treatment (P = .057). Survival from HL was also influenced by the IPS (P = .006) and time from the last CLL treatment (P = .047). The achievement of CR with ABVD was the only significant and independent factor predicting survival (P = .037). Taken together, our results show that the IPS and the interval from the prior CLL treatment influence the likelihood of achieving CR after ABVD, which is the most important factor predicting survival of patients with CLL developing HL.

Background: The transformation from a normal to a cancer cell is driven by the multistep acquisition of genetic alterations. Recently, shared mutations between clonal B cells in MBL/CLL and CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) have been identified. Similarly, a HPC origin of BRAFV600E mutations in hairy cell leukemia (HCL) has been uncovered, strengthening the notion that at least a fraction of somatic mutations may occur in CD34+ HPC before the malignant transformation of some B cell neoplasms. Since almost all WM patients have mutated MYD88L265P, it is worthy to investigate if this disease follows a similar pathogenic process than that of MBL/CLL or HCL. Aim: Define the cellular origin of WM by comparing the genetic landscape of WM cells to that of CD34+ HPC, B cell precursors and residual normal B cells. Methods: We used FACSorting to isolate 57 cell subsets from bone marrow (BM) aspirates of 10 WM patients: CD34+ HPC, B cell precursors, residual normal B cells (if detectable), WM B cells, plasma cells (PCs) and T cells (germline control). Whole-exome sequencing (WES, mean depth 79x) was performed with 10XGenomics Exome Solution for low DNA-input due to limited numbers of some cell types. Single-cell RNA and B-cell receptor sequencing (scRNA/BCRseq) was performed in total BM B cells and PCs (n=32,720) from 3 IgM MGUS and 2 WM patients. Accordingly, the clonotypic BCR detected in WM cells was unbiasedly investigated in all B cell maturation stages defined according to their molecular phenotype. In parallel, MYD88p.L252P (orthologous position of the human L265P mutation) transgenic mice were crossed with conditional Sca1Cre, Mb1Cre, and Cγ1Cre mice to selectively induce in vivo expression of MYD88 mutation in CD34+ HPC, B cell precursors and germinal center B cells, respectively. Upon immunization, mice from each cohort were necropsied at 5, 10 and 15 months. Results: All 10 WM patients showed MYD88L265P and 3 had mutated CXCR4. Notably, we found MYD88L265P in B cell precursors from 1/10 cases and in residual normal B cells from 4/10 patients, which were confirmed by ASO-PCR and ddPCR. Indeed, these more sensitive methods detected MYD88L265P in B cell precursors from 6/10 cases and in residual normal B cells from 6/10 patients. CXCR4 was simultaneously mutated in B cell precursors and WM B cells from one patient. Overall, CD34+ HPC, B-cell precursors and residual normal B cells shared a median of 2 (range, 0-45; mean VAF, 0.13), 3 (range, 1-44; mean VAF, 0.168), and 6 (range, 1-56; mean VAF, 0.29) somatic mutations with WM B cells; some being found all the way from CD34+ HPC to WM B cells and PCs. Interestingly, concordance between the mutational landscape of WM B cells and PCs was A median of 18 mutations (range, 3-26; median CCF and range, 0.72 [0.07 - 1]) were unique to WM cells. Importantly, clonal mutations in WM B cells were undetectable in normal cells. Thus, the few WM subclonal mutations observed in patients' lymphopoiesis could not result from contamination during FACSorting since in such cases, WM clonal mutations would become detectable in normal cells. Furthermore, copy number alterations (CNA) present in WM cells were undetectable in normal cells. scRNA/BCRseq unveiled that clonotypic cells were confined mostly within mature B cell and PC clusters in IgM MGUS, whereas a fraction of clonotypic cells from WM patients showed a transcriptional profile overlapping with that of B cell precursors. scRNA/BCRseq also uncovered transcriptional differences between clonal B cells from IgM MGUS vs WM patients (eg, proliferation, metabolism). In mice, induced expression of mutated MYD88 led to a moderate increase in the number of B220+CD138+ plasmablasts and B220-CD138+ PCs in lymphoid tissues and BM, but no signs of clonality or hematological disease. Interestingly, such increment was more evident in mice with activation of mutated MYD88 in CD34+ HPC and B-cell precursors vs mice with MYD88 L252P induced in germinal center B cells. Conclusions: We show for the first time that WM patients have somatic mutations, including MYD88L265P and CXCR4 at the B cell progenitor level. Taken together, this study suggests that in some patients, WM could develop from B cell clones carrying MYD88L265P rather than being the initiating event, and that other mutations or CNA are required for the expansion of B cells and PCs with the WM phenotype. Disclosures Motta: Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Rossi:Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Garcia-Sanz:Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Self: Patents & Royalties: BIOMED-2 PRIMERS FOR CLONALITY ASSESSMENT; IVS technologies: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties; Novartis: Research Funding. Roccaro:Transcan2-ERANET: Research Funding; European Hematology Association: Research Funding; Amgen: Other; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Other; Janssen: Other; Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC): Research Funding. San-Miguel:Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Takeda, Sanofi, Roche, Abbvie, GlaxoSmithKline and Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Paiva:Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; SkylineDx: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Adaptive: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy.

Background. Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare indolent lymphoma typical of the elderly population, with a median age at diagnosis of 65-70 years and median overall survival of approximately 10 years. Age is the most important prognostic factor in WM, and unrelated mortality significantly impacts survival in elderly patients. The past two decades have witnessed important treatment advances in WM, with the introduction of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in the early 2000s and of ibrutinib in more recent years. Less than 10% of WM patients are diagnosed at young age, and few studies have addressed their characteristics and outcome in the era of immunotherapy and targeted therapies. Here we report the presenting features, treatment and outcome of WM patients younger than 55 years diagnosed in 12 Hematologic Centers across Italy between 2000 and 2018. Patients and Methods. Diagnostic criteria were those established during the second International Workshop on WM (Owen et al, 2003) and were retrospectively applied to patients diagnosed before 2003. The overall survival (OS) observed in the study cohort was compared with the expected survival of the general Italian population matched by sex, age and calendar year. The expected survival estimates were derived from Italian life tables (Istituto Nazionale di Statistica, ISTAT). Results. The median age of patients included in the study was 50 years (interquartile range, IQR: 46-52). Their clinical characteristics at diagnosis are reported in Table 1. With a median follow-up of 5.6 years (IQR 3.1-9.1), 76 of 129 patients (59%) have been treated, at diagnosis (n=31, 41%) or after initial observation (n=45, 59%). The median treatment-free survival was 39 months. According to ISS-WM prognostic score, 58% were classified as low risk, 30% as intermediate risk and 12% as high risk. Frontline therapy included Rituximab in 71/76 patients (93%). Rituximab was associated with chemotherapy in 62 patients (82%), whereas 9 patients (12%) received a chemo-free induction. Five patients (7%) received chemotherapy only as first-line therapy (Table 2). The overall response rate (ORR) to induction therapy was 85%, including 39% CR+VGPR. Two patients received Rituximab maintenance for 2 years. The median progression-free survival (PFS) after first-line therapy was 76 months. Four of 76 patients (5%) received an autologous stem cell transplantation at relapse/progression. Overall, 14/76 patients (18%) received ibrutinib as first (n=2) or as subsequent line of therapy (n=12). During follow-up, 4/76 patients (5%) developed a solid cancer (bladder n=2, breast n=1, prostate n=1) and 2 a second hematologic cancer (chronic myelomonocytic leukemia n=1, secondary MDS n=1). Using a competing-risk model, accounting for death from any cause as the competing event, the cumulative incidence of second cancers was 2% at 5 years and 5.8% at 10 years. Three patients have died, 2 due to WM and 1 due to acute myeloid leukemia. The 5-and 10-year OS from diagnosis were 99% and 96% respectively. In a time-dependent survival analysis, considering therapy as a time-dependent covariate, the OS of treated and untreated WM patients was not significantly different (P = 0.162) (Figure 1). Among treated patients, the OS was significantly shorter in high-risk patients as compared with low- and intermediate-risk patients (5-year OS 85.7% versus 100%, P=0.018) (Figure 2). The OS of young WM patients was not significantly reduced as compared with age-, sex- and calendar year- matched general population (P > 0.05) (Figure 3). Conclusions. The presenting features of young WM patients resemble those typically described in the elderly WM population. Among treated patients, more than half are low-risk according to ISS-WM, confirming age as the most important prognostic factor. More than 90% of patients received Rituximab as part of the upfront treatment, mainly in combination with chemotherapy. Ibrutinib seems to be preferred over autologous stem cell transplantation in the relapsed/refractory setting. The outcome of young WM patients treated in Italy in the contemporary era was excellent in terms of both PFS and OS, with a life expectancy not significantly reduced as compared with the general population. Figure 1 Disclosures Varettoni: Gilead: Other: travel expenses; Janssen: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Other: travel expenses. Tedeschi:AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen spa: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Honoraria; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; SUNESIS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy. Benevolo:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Del Fabro:Janssen: Consultancy. Luminari:ROCHE: Other: Role as Advisor ; CELGENE: Other: Role as Advisor & Travel Grant; TAKEDA: Other: Travel Grant; GILEAD: Other: Lecturer . Arcaini:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Celgene, Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Gilead: Other: Travel expenses; Bayer, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Roche, Sandoz, Janssen-Cilag, VERASTEM: Consultancy.

Introduction: Patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who failed treatment with the Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) ibrutinib have a poor outcome and are difficult to treat. This ongoing, two-cohort, Phase II trial evaluates the safety and preliminary efficacy of tafasitamab (MOR208), an Fc-enhanced anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody in combination with idelalisib (IDE) (Cohort A) or venetoclax (VEN) (Cohort B) in R/R CLL pts previously treated with a BTKi. Preliminary results were published at EHA 2018 for Cohort A and at ASH 2018 for Cohort B. Here, we report the results of the primary analysis for both cohorts. Methods and Patients: Pts who either progressed or were intolerant to BTKi were enrolled at 12 sites in six countries in Europe and the US from Nov 2016 to Apr 2018. The primary endpoint is the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs); secondary endpoints include overall response rate (ORR) as per investigator assessment according to International Workshop on CLL (IWCLL) 2008 guidelines. Complete response (CR) was confirmed by computed tomography assessment and by bone marrow (BM) biopsy. The exploratory endpoint minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed centrally by quantitative allele-specific oligonucleotide-polymerase chain reaction (ASO-PCR) in peripheral blood (PB) and BM. Each treatment cycle (C) lasts 28 days (D). Dose and administration: tafasitamab intravenous infusion, 12 mg/kg weekly in C1-C3, every other week in C4-C6 and monthly from C7D1; IDE orally, 150 mg twice daily; VEN orally, weekly ramp up starting on C1D8 at 20 mg to full daily dose of 400 mg. Patients: mean time since first CLL diagnosis was 135 months (mos) for pts in Cohort A and 105 mos in Cohort B. Median number of prior therapy lines was five (2-9) and three (1-5), respectively. All pts had received ibrutinib; one pt had subsequent acalabrutinib treatment as last prior therapy line. Mutations of BTK and PLCγ2 were assessed in nine pts in Cohort A and 13 pts in Cohort B. BTK/PLCγ2 mutations were centrally detected in 4/3 pts in Cohort A and in 2/3 pts in Cohort B, respectively. Complex karyotype was observed in six (54.5%) pts in Cohort A and 12 (92.3%) pts in Cohort B. Results with a data cut-off date of 9 Nov 2018 are presented. Results: Cohort A: Median time on study was 9.9 mos (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.7-not reached). Eleven pts were enrolled and received tafasitamab and IDE. Two pts discontinued treatment due to AEs (aspartate-aminotransferase increased; acute pancreatitis), two due to progressive disease (PD) and one pt by physician's decision. One pt died due to PD and one pt due to cardiac failure. At the cut-off date, treatment was ongoing in four pts. Table 1 summarizes treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with neutropenia Grade ≥3 being most common (5 [46%]). Fourteen treatment-emergent serious AEs (SAEs) were reported in eight (72.7%) pts. ORR was 90.9% (CR=9.1%, partial response [PR]=81.8%), disease control was achieved in all 11 pts. One of eight pts (12.5%) assessed for MRD status reached MRD-negativity in PB at C14. Cohort B: Median time on study was 12 mos (95% CI: 2.8-not reached). Eleven of 13 enrolled pts received tafasitamab and VEN while two pts received tafasitamab only. Three pts discontinued treatment due to AEs (infusion-related reactions [two pts], diarrhea [one pt], one due to PD and one withdrew consent. At the cut-off date, treatment was ongoing in eight patients. Table 2 summarizes TEAEs, neutropenia Grade ≥3 was most commonly observed (six [46%] pts). Fourteen SAEs were reported in nine (69.2%) pts. The ORR in all 13 pts was 76.9% (CR=23.1%, PR=53.8%, not evaluable=23.1%). Six of seven pts assessed for MRD in PB (46.2% of 13 [100%] pts) reached negative status in PB by C7 at the latest. One of three pts assessed for MRD in BM (7.7% of 13 [100%] pts) reached MRD negative status in BM at C15. Conclusions: This trial demonstrates that in heavily pretreated pts with R/R CLL who failed prior BTKi, tafasitamab in combination with IDE or VEN is a potential therapeutic option. The safety profiles of the combinations are influenced by the combination partner, but both combinations are manageable. The response rates and MRD-negativity rates indicate that combinations of targeted agents with anti-CD19 tafasitamab have valuable antitumor activity and warrant further investigation of tafasitamab-based combinations in CLL. Disclosures Staber: AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda-Millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Jurczak:Celtrion: Research Funding; Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Loxo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Brugger:AstraZeneca: Equity Ownership; MorphoSys: Employment. Chanan-Khan:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Jansen: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic: Employment; Ascentage: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Greil:Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accomodation expenses, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accomodation expenses, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accomodation expenses, Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Cephalon: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accomodation expenses, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accomodation expenses, Research Funding; Ratiopharm: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accomodation expenses, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accomodation expenses, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accomodation expenses, Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Dirnberger-Hertweck:MorphoSys: Employment. Kelemen:MorphoSys: Employment. Middeke:Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Montillo:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Versatem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Munir:Acerta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Other: TBC; AbbVie: Honoraria; Alexion: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Morphosys: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Consultancy. Parikh:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Stilgenbauer:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Hoffmann La-Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Weirather:MorphoSys: Employment. Woyach:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Loxo: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Verastem: Research Funding. Wendtner:AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Hoffman-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

There is a significant need to develop an efficient treatment, without sacrificing efficacy, for older fit patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) as fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR) have very often led to treatment-related toxicities, causing delay or therapy

Introduction: Advanced stage follicular lymphoma (FL) is generally considered incurable. Although multiple remissions after treatment are possible, relapse is considered the rule, and the time to progression tends to become shorter after each relapse (Johnson, JCO 1995). Over the last decades, after the introduction of monoclonal anti-CD20 antibodies and of better treatment programs, the prognosis of FL has markedly improved from a median OS of 7 years to a 10-year OS rate >80%. Moreover, clinical observations of patients (pts) experiencing very long progression-free periods despite more than one previous treatment failure, have become not rare, suggesting that some pts could achieve operational FL cure. To assess the frequency of those prolonged long-term remissions and search for potential predictive factors, we have retrospectively analyzed the consecutive series of pts with FL seen at our institution. Methods: FL pts, aged >18 years, in maintained remission for more than 5 years after at least two lines of treatment were selected as "potentially cured" FL (PC-FL) and analyzed in detail. Their main characteristics at diagnosis and at last relapse, the different lines of treatment received and the time intervals (time to next treatment: TTNT) between them, were recorded and compared with those of FL pts seen in the same period (control group). Treatment strategies used were grouped and defined as follows: radiotherapy or surgery, for stage I-II (local), anthracycline and/or alkylating agents regimens (Alk/Ant), purine analogues regimens (Pur), monoclonal antibodies/radioimmunoconjugates as single agent (MoAb), autologous transplantation (ASCT). Results and discussion: Among 385 consecutive FL pts seen from January 1987 to December 2011, 56 (14,5%) met criteria for PC-FL. Their clinicopathological features at diagnosis, compared to controls, are shown in Table I. There were no significant differences except for a younger age (51 vs 58 years, p Conclusions: Approximately 15% of FL pts could currently achieve a very prolonged remission of about 10 years, even after multiple relapses. Its duration was 5x that of the last treatment line and more than twice that of active lymphoma, strongly suggesting the possibility of having achieved lymphoma cure. Younger age and grade 1-2 FL histology at diagnosis, and FLIPI low risk at relapse favored the achievement of PC-FL status. No specific treatment was associated with PC-FL and even an early relapse after first line treatment did not preclude to reach PC-FL, although early ASCT may be more effective for POD24 patients. Whether the achievement of PC-FL status may be related to biological factors will be interesting to be investigated in the next future. Disclosures Rossi: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria.

Patients with purine analogue-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have short survival and limited treatment options. Defining the best salvage strategies for this population is challenging, because limited data are available from clinical trials, and because studies have enrolled mixed populations (patients with recurrent and refractory disease or patients with refractory disease and Richter transformation). Moreover, patients with refractory CLL have a high incidence of unfavorable molecular and clinical features, such as high-risk genomic profiles, unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain genes, expression of zeta-chain-associated protein kinase 70, and bulky lymphadenopathies. These patients are also severely immunosuppressed because of the underlying disease and the treatments received, and experience a high rate of infectious complications that pose an additional difficulty in selecting treatment. Despite these challenges, in parallel with better characterizations of the biologic features of refractory CLL, the number of available treatment modalities for this population has increased. Several chemoimmunotherapy combinations have been developed, and novel agents with a different mechanism of action are being investigated in clinical trials. Furthermore, allogeneic stem cell transplantation with nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens is a therapeutic strategy that is increasingly offered to patients with refractory CLL.

Incorporation of novel agents into auto-SCT for patients with multiple myeloma has led to improvement in their outcomes. However, the effects of new drugs, either single or combined, on PBSC mobilization have not been fully evaluated, particularly in phase 3 clinical studies. We analyzed the impact of two novel agent-based induction treatments in patients enrolled in the GIMEMA MMY-3006 study comparing bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (VTD) versus thalidomide and dexamethasone (TD) in preparation for double auto-SCT. Results showed that a short-term induction therapy with VTD did not adversely affect CD34(+) cell yields as compared with TD (9.75 vs 10.76 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg, P=0.220). For poor mobilizers (

Introduction Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR) and bendmaustine rituximab (BR) combinations have both been evaluated as salvage regimens in Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia. FCR exerts good quality of responses but there are some concerns regarding its use mainly for tardive myelosuppression and long term toxicity. BR showed to be effective with an excellent short term toxic profile but in literature there are no data on long term follow-up and toxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate long term outcome and long term toxicity of patients treated with FCR and BR. Patients and Methods We analyzed 87 relapsed and refractory Waldenstrom's Macroglobuklinemia patients enrolled in two retrospective Italian multicenter studies in which FCR or BR were administered as salvage regimens. Patients treated with both bendamustine and fludarabine were excluded from the study. For each treatment group we compared: clinical and disease characteristics, Progression free survival (PFS) defined as progression or death for any cause from the beginning of salvage treatment; Event free survival (EFS) defined as progression or development of major infection, solid tumor, secondary MDS/AML, DLBCL, or death due to any cause. Results Of the 87 patients, 37 had received FCR and 50 BR. The two groups of patients did not differ in sex, median age, median number of prior treatments, previous therapy with alkylating agents, disease status, median IgM level, presence of adenopathies and/or splenomegaly at CT performed before salvage treatment. The significant differences between the two groups were: higher number of patients >70 years in the BR group (P=0.01) and lower number of patients previously treated with monoclonal antibody in the FCR population (P Conclusions FCR and BR as salvage regimens led to similar outcome in terms of PFS and EFS. Considering that FCR in respect to BR exerts long lasting responses the main issue remains its long term toxicity profile. The future challenge will be to assess the long term effect of the new targeted agents. Disclosures Ferrero: Mundipharma: Other: Speakers Honoraria; Celgene: Other: Speakers Honoraria.

Alemtuzumab has been extensively used in the salvage setting of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) resulting less effective on bulky lymphadenopathy.[1][1] Higher response rates have been achieved when combined with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC), but this regimen has led to some safety

Introduction. Observational studies from patients treated outside controlled clinical trials offer real life information and are relevant to understand whether data derived from prospective trials are reproducible in the clinical practice. A retrospective observational study was carried out by the GIMEMA (Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto) group in order to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treated with ibrutinib in Italy within a Named Patient Program (NPP). The NPP was intended to offer free and early drug access to CLL patients until ibrutinib became available on the Italian market. Methods. Patients included in the NPP program had refractory or relapsed (R/R) disease with progression within 24 months after prior chemo-immunotherapy, and/or 17p deletion/TP53 mutations. Patients were also required to have an ECOG performance status ≤2; serum creatinine ≤2 times, liver enzymes ≤3 times and total bilirubin ≤1.5 times the upper limit of normal. Key exclusion criteria were: the need of a concomitant treatment with a strong CYP3A inhibitor or warfarin, an allogeneic stem cell transplantation within the past 6 months or an ongoing active infection. All patients included in the program received ibrutinib orally as a single agent at the standard dose of 420 mg daily. Clinical data of 110 patients included in the NPP program between January 2014 and November 2014 have so far been collected and analyzed using the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) system. Patients were managed at 20 Italian centers and received at least one dose of ibrutinib. Clinical data were reported by the treating physicians. Results. The median age of patients was 69.9 years (range 49.8-83.3); 53% were in Rai stage III-IV, 32% in stage II and 15% in stage 0-I. Sixty-two percent of patients had relapsed disease, 38% were refractory to prior treatment. The presence of a 17p deletion and/or TP53 mutations was recorded in 51 R/R patients. Eighty-six percent of patients had an unmutated IGHV gene profile. The median number of prior treatments was 3 and included allogeneic stem cell transplantation in 4 cases. Two or more comorbidities were reported in 57 patients (52%) and included atrial fibrillation (AF) in 10 (9.1%) and hypertension in 40 (36.4%). After a median follow-up of 12.1 months (range, 1.6-24.6), 87 patients (79%) were still on ibrutinib. A response to ibrutinib was reported in 98/110 patients (89.1%). The best recorded response was a CR/CRi in 19 patients (17.3%), while a PR was reported in 79 patients (72%; PR-L 21.1%). Similar response rates were observed in patients with unmutated IGHV genes (91.9%) and in those with 17p deletion/TP53 mutations (90.3%). At 12 months, the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 92.9% (95%CI: 87.9-98.2) and 95.2% (95%CI: 91.1-99.4), respectively. PFS at 12 months of patients who achieved a response was 96.3%, 98.9% in unmutated IGHV patients, 90.7% in those with 17p deletion/TP53 mutations. Five patients (4.5%) died during the NPP program (1 patient each for sepsis, heart failure, ileus perforation, cancer, unknown cause). Adverse events (AE) were recorded in 75 patients (68.2%); in 47 (42.7%) they were grade ≥3. Any grade AEs recorded in ≥5% of patients were: infections (35%; grade ≥3, 22%), granulocytopenia (18.8%; grade ≥3, 17.2%), bleeding (15.5%; grade ≥3, 2.7%), fever of unknown origin or febrile neutropenia (12%; grade ≥3, 5.4%), AF (10.9%; grade ≥3, 4.5%), diarrhoea (8.3; grade ≥3, 2%), hypertension (7.2%; grade ≥3, 5.4%). A new event of AF occurred in 1/10 patients with a prior history of AF. Warfarin was required in 1 patient with AF and this was the reason for ibrutinib discontinuation. Conclusions. The results of the first interim analysis of this retrospective, real life study confirms that ibrutinib, as a single agent, is an effective treatment for patients with poor-prognosis CLL. Our data also suggest that ibrutinib given to unselected patients, in a compassionate-use program, shows a clinical activity and a safety profile comparable to those reported in prospective trials. Data collection is ongoing in order to complete the analysis of this large NPP cohort in Italy. Disclosures Marasca: Roche: Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria. Coscia:Karyopharm: Research Funding; ROCHE: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria. Zinzani:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MorphoSys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celegene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Molica:Jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche Italy: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead Sciences: Speakers Bureau. Orlandi:Ariad: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Ghia:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnology: Consultancy; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Foà:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Speakers Bureau.

The combination FCR (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab) proved to be active in Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia in a mixed population of untreated and previously treated patients. Prolonged myelosuppression and concerns about purine analogue treatment led to the conclusion that this regimen should be avoided in younger patients in first-line treatment. In this retrospective study on 40 patients we observed a response rate of 80% (32) after FCR salvage treatment with 32.5% (13) of patients reaching at least a very good partial remission. None of the prognostic variables had a significant effect on response or good quality of response achievement. Median event-free survival was reached at 77 months; median progression-free survival was not reached after a median follow-up of 51 months with any difference when categorizing patients according to quality of response. The results of this study suggest that the FCR regimen might overcome poor prognostic features and should be taken into account as salvage treatment. Tardive immunosuppression and myelosuppression warrant accurate patient follow-up.

Abstract 2898 Background: Notwithstanding the improved results with first-line therapy, CLL remains incurable, and patients are destined to relapse after primary treatment. The management of relapsed CLL pts is then dependent on several factors, including age, performance status, previous therapy, response and duration of response to therapy, and time from last therapy. Currently, the optimal treatment for pts with relapsed disease is not known. Bendamustine (BEN) demonstrated clinical activity in pre-treated hematological malignancies due to its unique mechanism of action distinct from standard alkylating agents. Alemtuzumab (CAM) is active in previously treated pts with CLL refractory to alkylating agents and purine nucleoside analogs. We designed a multicentric, single arm, dose escalation study to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ben Cam combination in refractory/relapsed CLL pts. Methods: Previously treated CLL pts requiring therapy were enrolled. In the first part of the study, the tolerability of a stepwise dose-escalation schedule of BEN along with an increasing dose of CAM has been determined. BEN was given at a starting dose of 50 mg/sqm for 2 consecutive days along with CAM 20 mg sc on days 1 to 3; if MTD was not reached within the 1st cohort, the 2nd cohort received an increased dose of CAM 30 mg with a subsequent further increase of BEN 70 mg/sqm if MTD was not reached. Treatment was repeated every 28 d up to 4 course. If one of 3 pts at each dose level experienced DLT three additional pts were added (max 6). If 5 of the 6 subjects were able to complete the first 2 courses without experiencing DLT, this level was considered tolerable and dose-escalation continued initiating the following cohort. Results: Between July 2008 and March 2012, 50 pts with previously treated CLL requiring therapy according to IWCLL criteria were enrolled in 9 Italian centres. The median age of our population was 67 years (range 46–82), 64% were male and all pts presented with Binet stage B or C. Pts' population was characterized by high risk biological and clinical disease profile: 44% were in Binet stage C, bulky lymph nodes were present in 24% of pts, refractory pts represented 26% of our population. According to hierarchical model, del17p was present in 28% and del11q in 24%; 66% were IGVH unmutated, 40% ZAP70+ and 36% CD38+. Median number of prior regimens was 2 (range, 1–4): 84% had previously received fludarabine-based treatment and 70% monoclonal antibodies in monotherapy or in combination. Twelve pts have been enrolled in the Phase I of this trial: 3 pts in each of the first 2 cohorts, 6 in the third cohort. BEN 70 mg/sqm and CAM 30 mg sc resulted as the MTD. Median number of courses administered was 4 (range, 1–4), 72% of pts completed treatment program being progression the major cause of discontinuation. At the time of writing 43 pts (86%) are evaluable for response, evaluation is pending in 7 pts who completed in all cases treatment program. Overall response rate resulted of 70% including 26% of CRs and 44% of PRs; 18% of pts maintained a stable disease; 12% showed a progression. Significant difference in response rate (P=0.009) was observed among pts with relapsed versus refractory disease. Previous treatment and unfavourable biological features did not affect response achievement. None of the variables considered showed to be significant in reaching a CR. In the whole series of treated pts grade III-IV hematological toxicity was: neutropenia in the 33% of courses, thrombocytopenia and anemia in 7 and 4% respectively. Febrile neutropenia developed in the 15% of courses. CMV reactivation occurred in 10% of courses without any organ involvement. We recorded 8 major infections: 3 sepsis, 4 pneumonias and 1 enteritis. Extra-hematological toxicity was mild. Median time to progression in responders was reached after a median follow-up of 15,5 months. Conclusions: Analysis of results data collected on 43/50 pts treated with 4-weekly dosing BENCAM regimen suggests that this combination is effective in relapsed and refractory CLL pts, most of them carrying adverse prognostic factors. Hematologic toxicity was the only serious adverse event observed with a manageable myelosuppression. Major infections recorded were not superior in quantity and quality to those observed using other immuno-chemotherapeutic regimens in the same setting. No toxic deaths were recorded while on treatment. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Impact of B-cell count and imaging screening in cMBL: any need to revise the current guidelines?

Summary. Campath-1H, an anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, is therapeutically active in lymphoproliferative and autoimmune diseases. After Campath-1H therapy, lymphocytes with a paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) phenotype have been reported to emerge. We characterized a PNH-like lymphocyte population emerging after Campath1H therapy, in a patient with fludarabine refractory B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (B-CLL). We demonstrated a reduction in PIG-A mRNA levels compared with controls, and of all cytokines tested [interleukin (IL)-4, IL-13, IL-2, interferon(IFN)-g, IL-6, IL-10, and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-a], except transforming growth factor (TGF)-b .G iven the inhibitory activity of TGF-b, its elevated levels may contribute to the selective pressure of Campath-1H, leading to the emergence of PNH-like lymphocytes.

Introduction: XPO1 (CRM1, Exportin 1) is the sole transporter of many tumor suppressor proteins (including MYC, BCL2, BCL6, BTK, IkB) and is elevated in non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Selinexor (Sel, KPT-330) is an oral covalent inhibitor of XPO1, the first clinical molecule of the Selective Inhibitors of Nuclear Export drug class. The phase I clinical trial of Sel in hematologic malignancies showed promising early single-agent efficacy with modest toxicity in relapsed Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL, Gutierrez et al, ASCO 2014). DLBCL, the most common lymphoid malignancy, is currently cured in only 10% of relapsed patients, and consists of 2 subtypes based on putative cell of origin (COO): activated B-cell (ABC) and germinal center B-cell (GCB). We performed preclinical studies of Sel, modeling its single-agent efficacy in frontline and relapsed DLBCL and its potential synergy with other clinically relevant therapeutics. Long-term follow-up data on patients(pts) treated with Radiolabeled antibody 90-yttrium-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan (RIT) are necessary to define the role of RIT-therapy (RIT-t) in current clinical practice. There are few reports about the use of RIT outside clinical trials. Outcome and toxicity of radioimmunotherapy remain a matter of concern. Incidence of MDS/AML reported after RIT-t as consolidation in front line varies from 3 to 4.3% (Czuczman et al, JCO 2007; Morschhauser et al, JCO 2012). A recent study with RIT and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as front line therapy in mantle cell lymphoma reported 20% incidence of secondary malignancies, (Arranz et al, Haemat 2013). So the aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of pts treated with RIT-t in clinical practice and to assess the incidence of secondary neoplasia particularly MDS/AML. We included in this retrospective analysis all pts with Diffuse B Large Cell Lymphoma (DBLCL), Follicular Lymphoma (FL) and Marginal Zone lymphoma (MZL), treated with RIT-t over the last decade at our Institution. We adopted the standard RIT therapeutic regimen: infusion of 250 mg/m2 rituximab on day 1, a second 250 mg/m2 dose on day 7, followed by dose of RIT (0.4 mCi/kg), administered 4 h following rituximab infusion. Response assessment was made as recommended by International Workshop criteria. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier method and univariate analysis with Log-Rank test with a significance at 0.05. Between March 2006 and January 2014 61 pts underwent RIT-t, of these 57 had complete data and were considered for analysis. There were 16 DBLCL, 29 Follicular Lymphoma and 12 MZL. Twentythree were male, 34 female. Median age at diagnosis was 62 years(yrs) (range 36; 79), 66yrs (range 39;79) at RIT-t. Thirteen pts (all DBLCL) received RIT-t as front line consolidation. Forty-four pts (3 DBLCL, 12 MZL, 29 FL) underwent RIT-t after ≥1 therapy line: one prior line was received by 15pts, 2 by 19, 3 by 8 and 4 by 2. Before RIT-t 24pts were in relapse (2DBLCL, 2MZL, 20FL), 9 were refractory (2 MZL, 7 FL), 7 in partial response (1 DBLCL, 5 MZL, 1FL) while 4 were in complete remission (2 MZL, 2FL). Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have defects in both cellular and humoral immunity. Since CD152 (CTLA-4) plays a critical role in downregulating T-cell responses, we studied the expression of surface and cytoplasmic CD152 (sCD152 and cCD152, respectively) in freshly isolated T cells from treatment-naïve patients with CLL. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from these patients demonstrated significantly increased sCD152 and cCD152 compared to normal donors. Furthermore, these patients had an increased proportion of the regulatory CD4(+)/CD25(+)/CD152+ subset that correlated with advanced Rai stage, unfavorable cytogenetics and low serum IgG and IgA levels. The expression of sCD152 by T cells also correlated with ZAP-70 expression by CLL B cells. The proportion of CD4(+)/CD25+ cells was also correlated with unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable gene status. Blockade of CD152 with monoclonal antibody (mAb) in proliferation assays was associated with potent T-cell proliferation in response to autologous and allogeneic CD40-activated CLL B cells. In summary, T cells from patients with CLL may be primed for anergy by expressing increased amounts of CD152; anti-CD152 mAb may represent a therapeutic opportunity to enhance an immune response against autologous leukemia cells.

Introduction The seminal phase 3 trial conducted by the German CLL Study Group demonstrated that the addition of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody [mAb] rituximab to the FC platform (FCR) improved response rates, progression free survival and also overall survival. However, FCR showed considerable hematologic toxicity, particularly among patients over age 70. Pentostatin demonstrated similar response frequency to other purine analogues in CLL. Furthermore, its relative lack of myelotoxicity has allowed to use it with improved tolerability particularly when administered in combination with myelotoxic agents such as cyclophosphamide. Ofatumumab is a fully human anti-CD20 mAb with clinical activity as a single agent in patients with fludarabine-refractory CLL. Ofatumumab appears to have greater single agent clinical activity than rituximab in patients with previously treated CLL and also has activity in rituximab-refractory patients. Given the reported efficacy of chemo immunotherapy [CIT] in CLL and the activity and toxicity profile of pentostatin combinations, we designed a trial of pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and Ofatumumab for previously untreated older patients with CLL. Methods Patients with CLL who required therapy (2008 NCI-WG guidelines) aged ≥ 65 years and ECOG PS of 0-2 were enrolled to receive Pentostatin 2 mg/sqm and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/sqm both as intravenous infusions at day 1 of each 21 day cycle and Ofatumumab administered as intravenous infusions (Cycle 1: 300 mg day 1 and 1000 mg day 2, subsequent cycles: 1000 mg at day 1). Ofatumumab premedication included acetaminophen, antihistamine and glucocorticoid. Treatment duration was of 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) including detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) and secondary endpoints included, progression-free survival (PFS) overall survival (OS) and safety. Patients 49 patients from 12 centres from the italians regions of Lombardy and Piedmont were included. Baseline demographics were: Median age 72.8 years with 64% aged over 70, among them 32 were males (65%). Disease characteristics in 32 patients evaluable at this point were: 76% Binet stage B and 24% C; 45% of patients had unmutated IGVH, 7 % showed 17p deletions. Results ORR was 93.7% with 41% CR(11)/CR(2) with incomplete marrow recovery [CRi]. All six intended courses of treatment were administered to 30 (94%), and 90% of these patients received full-dose treatment. The reason for discontinuing treatment before completing six courses was myelosuppression occurring in 2 patients. The primary reason for dose reduction was again myelosuppression. Grade ≥3 AEs that occurred from start of treatment until 60 days after the last dose were experienced by 62% of patients receiving PCO with the most common being neutropenia [Total number of patients with at least one Grade 3 or 4 event: 19 patients] while anemia and thrombocytopenia were detected only as grade 1 to 2 in 41% and 25% of cases respectively. Of the grade 1 to 2 toxicities, fever occurred in 2 patients (6%), hypotension occurred in 2 patients (6%), nausea and vomiting occurred in 3 patients (9%), skin rash of grade 1 occurred in 2 patients. Grade 3 infusion-related AEs were reported in 12% of patients. There were no grade 4 toxicities associated with any Ofatumumab infusion. Grade 3 infection was reported in 1 patient (3%) being a pneumonia. No deaths during treatment occurred in these 32 subjects. Conclusion Ofatumumab added to Pentostatin and Cyclophosphamide demonstrated clinically important results and is well tolerated in patients with previously untreated CLL. In this preliminary report the efficacy of this ofatumumab-based CIT compares favorably to the historical rituximab-based CIT using the same chemotherapeutic agents with a more manageable side effect profile in this older population. Further data in a higher number of enrolled patients and including MRD detection will be presented at the Meeting. Disclosures: Montillo: Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Rambaldi:Novartis: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Italfarmaco: Honoraria.

A case of acute promyelocytic leukaemia following mitoxantrone treatment of multiple sclerosis

Abstract 3228 Objective: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a rare, but often fatal demyelinating brain disease caused by the JC virus, which usually occurs in immunosuppressed patients, including those with hematological malignancies or receiving monoclonal antibodies-based immunotherapies. PML is likely the result of a complex combination of several pathogenic mechanisms, such as alterations of peripheral cell-mediated immunity and mobilization of JC virus-carrying CD34+-hematopoetic stem cells and pre-B-cells. Taking advantage of the availability of samples from a multiple sclerosis (MS) patient treated with the anti-α4β1 monoclonal antibody natalizumab who developed PML, which was monitored for 35 months since before therapy initiation, we investigated the role of B and T lymphocytes in PML onset. Methods: Real-Time PCR was used to measure the release of T and B cells from the production sites by means of T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) and K-deleting excision circles (KRECs) analysis and to quantify transcripts for immature hematopoietic cells such as terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase, CD34, and pre-B lymphocyte gene 1. Naïve and mature T- and B-cell subsets were identified by flow cytometry, T-cell heterogeneity was quantified by spectratyping and IgA, IgG and IgM by turbidimetric assay. Data were compared to those of untreated and natalizumab-treated MS patients and healthy donors. Results: After 34 months of natalizumab therapy, a 42 years old female developed PML, diagnosed on the basis of magnetic resonance imaging and JC virus positivity in cerebrospinal fluid. Before therapy, her thymus and bone marrow produced a significant low number of TRECs+ and KRECs+ cells. While TRECs remained low during all therapy period, KRECs and transcripts for pre-B lymphocyte gene 1, which is selectively expressed in pre-B cells, peaked after 6 months of therapy, remained high at 12 and 15 months of treatment, and then decreased at the moment of PML onset. Flow cytometry confirmed a deficient production of CD4+CD45RA+CCR7+CD31+ recent T emigrants, counterbalanced by an increased number of CD8+CCR7–CD45RA+ TEMRA cells for all observation period, but showed a modification of peripheral CD4 and CD8 cell number only at the moment of PML. While the percentage of naïve B cells increased by about 70% after 6 months of therapy, the number of B lymphocytes within each B-cell subpopulations remained low for the entire treatment period. T-cell repertoire and immunoglobulin production were altered. Interpretation: Although performed in a single patient, data all agree in demonstrating that a deficient production of new TRECs+ T lymphocytes, together with an increase of newly produced KRECs+ B cells just few months after therapy beginning may predispose to PML. These findings encourage further researches on the utility of the TRECs/KRECs assay as a potential tool for the identification of patients at risk of developing PML after monoclonal antibodies-based therapies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Background Hemophagocytic Lymphohystiocytosis (HLH) is a rare disorder, characterized by uncontrolled hyperinflammation, fever, cytopenias, hepatosplenomegaly and hemophagocytosis caused by genetic defects, e.g. perforin 1, causing impaired natural killer (NK) and cytotoxic T-cell function. A disease characterized by hyperactive phagocytosis similar to familial HLH can occasionally develop in adult patients (pts) and is called acquired hemophagocytic syndrome (AHS). The diagnosis of AHS is often overlooked because of its rarity and heterogeneous clinical presentation. It is usually associated with virus infection (VAHS), autoimmune disorders or malignancies. AHS has been described in Asian pts with lymphoma particularly of T-cell or intravascular large B cell phenotype but has been only occasionally reported in pts of Western origin. Aims To evaluate the occurrence of AHS in adult lymphoma pts of Western origin, focusing on its biological and clinical features. Methods From 2/03 through 02/08 the revised diagnostic criteria of the Histiocyte Society were applied to lymphoma pts presenting with persistent FUO, unexplained cytopenia or clinical signs of AHS. Work-up included detection of HHV-8, EBV, CMV, Parvovirus viral DNA, evaluation of NK activity of PBMCs by 4-hour51Cr-release assay with K562 cells, perforin expression on NK cells by flow cytometry, and by immunohystochemistry on bone marrow biopsy and analysis of perforin gene mutations by PCR and sequencing. Results Fifteen pts fulfilling the criteria for HLH were identified. Their M/F ratio was 1,5 and median age was 66 (31–79). Lymphoma diagnoses clustered in three groups: 5 cases of indolent B cell lymphoma (4 SLL/CLL, 1 SMZL), 5 cases of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), two of which associated with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL),1 case of HL, and 4 cases of T cell lymphoma (1 anaplastic, 1 peripheral unspecified and 2 enteropathic). Among HLH diagnostic criteria, fever, cytopenia and high ferritin occurred in 100%, hypertriglyceridemia in 86%; hypofibrinogenemia and splenomegaly in 66%, and prominent bone marrow hemophagocytosis in 46% of cases. Median Hgb level was 9,1 g/L, ANC 0,7 × 109/L and platelets 23 × 109/L. Median trygliceride levels was 305 mg/dL, fibrinogen 122 mg/dL ferritin 6800 ng/mL. Moreover LDH was elevated in 13/15 cases (median 711 U/L). No significant differences were recorded between the different types of lymphoma except for a lower platelet count in pts with indolent B cell lymphoma (P=.008). No recurrent immunological abnormalities were identified except for direct antiglobulin test positivity in 5/8 pts with B cell lymphoma, without signs of overt hemolysis. Viral DNA was detected only in 3 pts (1 EBV, 1 CMV and 1 CMV+EBV). Biological investigations showed defective NK activity in 83% of pts. Among 9 evaluable pts, analysis of PRF1 gene identified G1070A mutation in 1 pt. and A91V heterozygous polymorphism in 2 pts showing defective PRF1 expression of NK cells by flow cytometry. Perforin expression on bone marrow biopsies was increased in 6 of 11 evaluable pts. Twelve pts died 1–120 days after diagnosis in spite of therapy with steroid, rituximab, high-dose IgG, antivirals and etoposide. Three are alive 22–34+ months after diagnosis. They had not distinctive clinicopathological features at presentation. Conclusions AHS is not unusual in Western adults with lymphoma of T-cell but also of B cell phenotype, being overrepresented in SLL/CLL and in DLBCL, particularly when associated with HL. Genetic abnormalities of PRF1 are predisposing factors in some cases. However further mechanisms of defective NK function likely account for the development of this very severe condition and should be actively explored in order to ameliorate its dismal prognosis.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a clonal B cell malignancy characterized by defects in both cellular and humoral immunity. Each immune defect can be linked to common infectious complications affecting these patients. Predisposition to infections can be compounded by immunosuppression from cytotoxic chemotherapy. The purine analog fludarabine has been associated with a spectrum of infections caused by prolonged T lymphocyte depletion. The combination of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) was developed based on complementary activity of the combination. FCR has significant activity in both chemotherapy-naïve (ChN) and previously treated (PrT) patients with CLL. We analyzed risk factors for infection and describe the infections experienced by both ChN and PrT patients during FCR treatment. We performed a retrospective review of medical records of 224 ChN and 177 PrT patients with CLL treated with the FCR regimen at MD Anderson Cancer Center from 7/99-8/02. Review was until relapse, death, or end of treatment. We focused on infectious events that occurred during and within 30 days of the last cycle of FCR treatment. Prophylaxis for herpes virus (valacyclovir) was recommended for all patients. Prophylaxis for P carinii (trimethoprim-sulfa) was recommended for all PrT patients and was done at the discretion of the treating physician for ChN patients. Infectious events were experienced by 96/224 (43.2%) ChN and 99/177 (56.2%) PrT patients. Causative agents were identified in 23% of events for ChN and 17% of events for the PrT patients (Table 1). There was a higher incidence of any event (p=0.012) and major infectious (MI) events (p Among ChN patients, univariate analysis identified low serum IgG (2 chemotherapy courses (p=0.044) as risk factors for MI. Multivariate analysis identified low serum IgG (p=0.03) as the only predictor for MI. Among PrT patients, univariate analysis identified female gender (p=0.015) and baseline hemoglobin level (p=0.031) as risk factors for MI. Multivariate analysis identified increased WBC count (p=0.026) and high (>4.0 mg/dL) beta-2 microglobulin (ß2M) (p=0.027) as risk factors for MI in PrT patients. Among ChN and PrT patients none of the variables were found to be risk factor for minor infections (mI) in univariate analysis; multivariate analysis identified high ß2M (p=0.034) and splenomegaly (p=0.033) as significant predictors for occurrence of mI among PrT patients. For ChN patients, the nadir neutrophil count was not significantly associated with occurrence of mI or MI over the 6 courses of treatment. On the contrary, it was associated with occurrence of minor, major and any infection in the PrT patients. FCR is a higly effective and well-tolerated regimen. IgG 4.0 mg/L were the main predictive variables for MI in PrT patients. Table 1 Confirmed Infectious agent ChN Events/224 Pts PrT Events/177/Pts Gram+ bacteria 1 4 Gram- bacteria 4 1 Candida species 1 0 Aspergillus species 2 1 Pneumocystis carinii 2 0 VZV 3 6 HSV 6 4 CMV 3 1

Hyperhomocysteinemia (HH) has been associated with cardiovascular and autoimmune diseases and oxidative cell damage. Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are associated with autoimmunity (AI) and increased oxidative stress. We tested the association of HH and oxidative stress in 33 MDS patients, by measuring plasma homocysteine and malondialdehyde (MDA). HH was found in 42% of cases, (4/5) cases with associated cardiovascular events (CVE)(80%), and 9/15 cases with associated AI (60%). Thus in MDS, HH was significantly associated with AI/CVE (chi(2) : p=0.0011), and this association seems to be specific, as demonstrated by the comparison of MDS presenting AI/CVE with the ischemic cardiopathy/rheumatoid arthritis control group (13/20, 65% vs 19/69, 27%; chi(2) : p=0.0021). The levels of MDA indicated increased oxidative stress. Our data may suggest that in a subset of MDS, HH may simultaneously contribute to bone marrow myelodysplasia, CVE and AI pathogenesis, possibly through oxidative cell damage.