Search

Introduction The effect of neoadjuvant systemic therapies (NST) on technical aspects of operation for resectable stage III melanoma is unknown. Prospective capture of the estimated and actual degree of difficulty of therapeutic lymphadenectomy at presentation and after NST may inform the relative merits of NST versus surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. Methods We designed surgeon survey tools to capture key impressions at baseline prior to NST and postoperatively. We conducted a sub-study within a multi-institutional clinical trial for high-risk operable stage III melanoma (NeoACTIVATE, NCT03554083) which enrolls clinically node-positive patients to 12 weeks of combinatorial NST determined by BRAF status. Survey data were analyzed. Results Surveys were completed for 24 of 25 patients (96%). Affected nodal basins were cervical (3, 13%) axillary (9, 38%), inguinal ± pelvic (14, 58%); 2 (8%) involved ≥ 2 basins. Baseline estimates included largest affected node size (median/range 4/1.4-11 cm), number of involved nodes (median/range 3/1-10) and tumor fixation (present in 12, 50%). At operation, actual degree of difficulty increased from the baseline estimate in 4 (17%) and decreased in 6 (25%). Surgery was less difficult, average, or more difficult versus usual operation in 4, 9, and 11 cases (17%, 38%, 46%), respectively. Conclusions Although many operations were judged to be more difficult than the usual therapeutic lymphadenectomy, operation following NST was more often perceived as easier than more difficult versus baseline impression. Engaging surgical oncologists to perform similar structured assessments across clinical trials will permit cross-study analysis of the effect of NSTs on the technical conduct of lymphadenectomy.

For patients with stage III melanoma with occult lymph node metastasis, the use of adjuvant therapy is increasing, and completion lymph node dissection (CLND) is decreasing. We sought to evaluate the use of modern adjuvant therapy and outcomes for patients with stage III melanoma who did not undergo CLND. Patients with a positive SLNB from 2015 to 2020 who did not undergo CLND were evaluated retrospectively. Nodal recurrence, recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and melanoma-specific survival were evaluated. Among 90 patients, 56 (62%) received adjuvant therapy and 34 (38%) underwent observation alone. Patients who received adjuvant therapy were younger (mean age: 53 vs. 65, p

S-100B is used in melanoma follow-up. This serum biomarker is also present in adipocytes; therefore, subcutaneous adipocytes trapped in the needle before performing a venipuncture could contaminate the serum. The aim was to study the influence of adipocyte contamination on blood samples used for S-100B analysis, possibly resulting in falsely elevated S-100B values. A total of 294 serum samples were collected from 147 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging stage III melanoma patients. The mean difference between the first (dummy) and second tubes was 0.003 μg/l (p = 0.077), with a decrease in the second tube. Compared with the second tube, the S-100B level was higher in the first tube in 33.3% of the samples, equal in 36.8% of the samples and lower in 29.9% of the samples. No significant difference between the two consecutively drawn tubes was found. There seems to be no necessity of implementing a dummy tube system for accurate S-100B determination in melanoma patients.

Patients with resected stage III melanoma have a heterogeneous prognosis with an especially high risk of relapse for patients with stage IIIB, IIIC and IIID according to the 2018 classification inThe aim of this article is to review the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics and safety data of pembrolizumab in resected stage III melanoma and to compare its safety profile to other immune checkpoint inhibitors for the same indication.Pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy of resected stage III melanoma showed an acceptable safety profile, which is comparable to that in advanced melanoma. However, it caused one death. There is uncertainty about its benefits in AJCC-8 stage IIIA melanoma patients. Additionally, caution is required since OS and long-term safety data are not available yet.

Background The role of surveillance imaging in high-risk stage III melanoma patients after complete surgical resection remains controversial, and with the advent of adjuvant therapy, it may also be expanded. Therefore, we evaluated two fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) protocols in two cohorts. Methods Cohort 1 (n = 35) focused on surveillance in asymptomatic patients (before approval and reimbursement of adjuvant therapy) and was assigned to 5x FDG-PET/CT's after surgery: one every 6 months for 2 years, with one final scan after 3 years. Cohort 2 (n = 42) was assigned to one screening FDG-PET/CT, which took place in between surgery and the start of adjuvant treatment. Results In cohort 1 (median follow-up: 33 months), 12 patients (34.3%) developed recurrence detected by FDG-PET/CT, of which 7 (20.0%) were detected with the first scan. Sensitivity and specificity were 92.3% and 100%, respectively. In cohort 2, recurrence was suspected on nine scans (21.4%) and four (9.5%) were true positive. The number of scans needed to find one asymptomatic recurrence were 8.8 and 10.5 in cohort 1 and 2, respectively. Conclusions FDG-PET/CT is a valuable imaging tool to detect recurrence in stage III melanoma, even shortly after surgery. A surveillance FDG-PET/CT protocol after surgery or a screening PET/CT before adjuvant therapy should be considered.

PURPOSE Three new therapies have been approved recently for the adjuvant treatment of stage III melanoma, substantially reducing the risk of tumor recurrences. This study evaluates 3 independent data sets to clarify the survival probabilities of patients with stage III melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS The Central Malignant Melanoma Registry (CMMR) evaluated 1,553 patients with a primary diagnosis of stage III melanoma from 2000 to 2012. Studies from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), of 573 patients in the observation arm of the 18991 study and 445 patients in the placebo arm of the 18071 study, were evaluated as reference cohorts. The survival outcomes were compared with the published American Joint Committee on Cancer version 8 (AJCCv8) stage III survival data. RESULTS For the CMMR stage III cohort versus the AJCCv8 cohort, the melanoma-specific survival (MSS) rates at 5 years were 67% versus 77%, and at 10 years were 56% versus 69%, respectively. For stage IIIA, the MSS rates at 5 years were 80% versus 93%, and at 10 years were 71% versus 88%; for stage IIIB, the MSS rates at 5 years were 75% versus 83%, and at 10 years were 61% versus 77%. The MSS rates of the EORTC studies either overlapped with or were lower than, the CMMR data. CONCLUSION The MSS rates in the CMMR and EORTC cohorts over the entire stage III are less favorable than those published in AJCCv8. This is particularly true for substages IIIA and IIIB.

PURPOSE Improved understanding of the incidence, risk factors, and timing of CNS metastasis is needed to inform surveillance strategies for patients with melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Clinical data were extracted from the databases of 2 major melanoma centers in the United States and Australia for 1,918 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition stage III melanoma, diagnosed from 1998-2014, who had (negative) baseline CNS imaging within 4 months of diagnosis. The cumulative incidence of CNS metastasis was calculated in the presence of the competing risk of death, from stage III presentation and at benchmark time points 1, 2, and 5 years postdiagnosis. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 70.2 months, distant recurrence occurred in 711 patients (37.1%). The first site of distant metastasis was CNS only for 3.9% of patients, CNS and extracranial (EC) for 1.8%, and EC only for 31.4%. Overall, 16.7% of patients were diagnosed with CNS metastasis during follow-up. The cumulative incidence of CNS metastasis was 3.6% (95% CI, 2.9% to 4.6%) at 1 year, 9.6% (95% CI, 8.3% to 11.0%) at 2 years, and 15.8% (95% CI, 14.1% to 17.6%) at 5 years. The risk of CNS metastasis was significantly influenced by patient sex, age, AJCC stage, primary tumor site, and primary tumor mitotic rate in multivariable and conditional analyses. High primary tumor mitotic rate was significantly associated with increased risk of CNS metastasis at diagnosis and all subsequent time points examined. CONCLUSION Similar rates of CNS metastasis were observed in 2 large, geographically distinct cohorts of patients with stage III melanoma. The results highlight the importance of primary tumor mitotic rate. Furthermore, they provide a framework for developing evidence-based surveillance strategies and evaluating the impact of contemporary adjuvant therapies on the risk of CNS metastasis development.

PURPOSE We conducted the phase III double-blind European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 1325/KEYNOTE-054 trial to evaluate pembrolizumab versus placebo in patients with resected high-risk stage III melanoma. On the basis of 351 recurrence-free survival (RFS) events at a 1.25-year median follow-up, pembrolizumab prolonged RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; P < .0001) compared with placebo. This led to the approval of pembrolizumab adjuvant treatment by the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration. Here, we report an updated RFS analysis at the 3.05-year median follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 1,019 patients with complete lymph node dissection of American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual (seventh edition; AJCC-7), stage IIIA (at least one lymph node metastasis > 1 mm), IIIB, or IIIC (without in-transit metastasis) cutaneous melanoma were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab at a flat dose of 200 mg (n = 514) or placebo (n = 505) every 3 weeks for 1 year or until disease recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. The two coprimary end points were RFS in the overall population and in those with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)–positive tumors. RESULTS Pembrolizumab (190 RFS events) compared with placebo (283 RFS events) resulted in prolonged RFS in the overall population (3-year RFS rate, 63.7% v 44.1% for pembrolizumab v placebo, respectively; HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.68) and in the PD-L1–positive tumor subgroup (HR, 0.57; 99% CI, 0.43 to 0.74). The impact of pembrolizumab on RFS was similar in subgroups, in particular according to AJCC-7 and AJCC-8 staging, and BRAF mutation status (HR, 0.51 [99% CI, 0.36 to 0.73] v 0.66 [99% CI, 0.46 to 0.95] for V600E/K v wild type). CONCLUSION In resected high-risk stage III melanoma, pembrolizumab adjuvant therapy provided a sustained and clinically meaningful improvement in RFS at 3-year median follow-up. This improvement was consistent across subgroups.

Resume Introduction La publication recente d’essais randomises testant l’interet des traitements adjuvants et du curage ganglionnaire au stade III microscopique amene a reconsiderer la prise en charge du melanome sur plusieurs aspects : l’indication de recherche du ganglion sentinelle, l’indication de curage ganglionnaire au stade microscopique et les traitements adjuvants. L’objectif de notre etude etait d’evaluer les pratiques actuelles et d’interroger les onco-dermatologues sur les changements envisages dans leur pratique a la lumiere des publications recentes. Materiel et methodes Nous avons effectue un sondage aupres des medecins membres du Groupe de cancerologie cutanee de la Societe francaise de dermatologie en octobre 2017. Resultats Quarante centres francais etaient representes et 53 reponses individuelles ont ete enregistrees. La technique du ganglion sentinelle etait pratiquee par 75 % des centres. Avant l’ete 2017 et la publication de l’essai MSLT-II, (demontrant l’absence de benefice therapeutique a la realisation d’un curage ganglionnaire lors de la decouverte d’un ganglion sentinelle positif), 90 % des centres effectuaient un curage ganglionnaire en cas de positivite du ganglion sentinelle. A la lumiere des resultats de l’etude MSLT-II, 45 % des repondeurs envisageaient de ne plus le realiser. Le rapport benefice/risque incitait a la prescription, a visee adjuvante, du nivolumab pour 96 % et de l’association dabrafenib + trametinib pour 79 % des medecins repondeurs, alors que l’interferon et l’ipilimumab n’etaient plebiscites que par respectivement 21 % et 15 % des repondeurs. Conclusion La prise en charge du melanome au stade precoce va connaitre d’importants changements grâce a l’arrivee de traitements adjuvants au rapport benefice/risque favorable ; on peut egalement s’attendre a une diminution des indications de curage ganglionnaire pour les patients au stade III microscopique.

This pilot study explored the value of localized index node removal after neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with stage III melanoma, for use as a response indicator to guide the extent of completion lymph node dissection. Promising technology.

Aim: To estimate incidence of stage III melanoma using the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging, 7th and 8th edition. Patients & methods: The SEER US cancer registry was analyzed (2010–2014). AJCC7 stages were recorded in the data; AJCC8 stages were inferred. Results: Of 106,195 melanoma patients, 7669 and 7342 had stage III melanoma by AJCC7 and AJCC8, respectively (95% overlap). Nearly 30% of patients with AJCC7 stage III melanoma were reclassified in a higher stage III group by AJCC8 versus 7% in lower stage group. Regardless of the AJCC edition, incidence of stage III melanoma has increased from 2010 to 2014 both overall and within each stage III group. Conclusion: Providing appropriate management to this growing population of high-risk patients is a priority.

Background In the precheckpoint inhibitor era, high-dose interferon was the only approved adjuvant therapy for high-risk melanoma. In this manuscript, we analyze the recurrence-free survival, overall survival and toxicity profile of adjuvant treatment with interleukin-2 (IL-2) and 5-(3,3-dimethyle-1-triazeno) imidazole-4-carboxamide (DTIC) for resected high-risk melanoma patients. Methods All patients with stage IIB, IIC or stage III melanoma who were treated with DTIC/IL-2 combination therapy at a single institution from 2000 to 2010 were identified from the University of Louisville Hospital medical record. Patients received 6 months of subcutaneous IL-2 (12 × 106 units days 1-4) and intravenous DTIC (750 mg/m2 day 1 of each cycle) every 28 days for 6 cycles. Individual medical records were accessed to collect the data. Results Of the 112 patients treated, all underwent surgical resection and then received adjuvant treatment. A total of 58.7% of the patients were male, 42.2% female; 99% were Caucasian. A total of 79 (72.5%) of the patients were alive at the time of analysis and 57 (47.7%) patients were currently event free. A total of 69 (63.3%) patients completed all 6 months of adjuvant combination treatment with 13.8% of the patients requiring IL-2 and 21.1% of the patients requiring DTIC dose reduction. Five year overall survival was 75.57% with recurrence-free survival of 53.05%. Conclusions For several decades, there has not been an ideal adjuvant treatment for patients with resected high risk melanoma. Our retrospective analysis suggests that combination therapy with DTIC/IL-2 is beneficial and relatively well tolerated as an alternative adjuvant treatment for patients with high-risk melanoma.

Last decade brought new achievements in the melanoma research, which resulted in an important changes in the clinical management of stage III melanoma. The article summarizes recent updates with particular focus on practical aspects. Results from surgical studies, Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II (MSLT-II) and German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group (DeCOG-SLT) proved that surgical dogmatic approach that all sentinel node melanoma metastasis warrants completion lymphadenectomy is no longer valid; omission of completion lymphadenectomy in large proportion of sentinel node positive melanoma patients has no negative impact on survival rates. Moreover oncological trials (COMBI-AD, EORTC 1325/KEYNOTE-054 and CheckMate 238) showed that in stage III melanoma patients' chances of recurrence-free survival can be improved by 10-20% by modern immunotherapy and/or molecular targeted therapy. These findings led to fall of another dogma in oncology: lack of effective adjuvant therapy for stage III melanoma at acceptable toxicity. At the end of the day in 2021 modern multidisciplinary approach incorporating newest findings offer stage III melanoma patients less surgical complications of better tailored surgery and longer survival in result of efficient adjuvant therapy.

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibition has dramatically changed the treatment of melanoma. Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 and programmed cell death protein 1 are approved for the treatment of advanced melanoma alone and in combination. In addition, these agents are approved for use in high-risk resected stage III melanoma in the adjuvant setting. Clinical trials testing the combination of immune checkpoint inhibition with other therapies and novel immunotherapies continue. This article reviews the current literature on approved uses of immune checkpoint inhibition in melanoma and discusses ongoing trials and future directions.

This is a video presentation describing the technical aspect of a robotic external iliac, deep inguinal and obturator lymph node dissection in a 45 years old male with stage III melanoma. He initially presented with a three month's history of tenesmus and increasing perianal pain with no previous past medical history. He was seen by his primary care physician who referred him to MD Anderson Cancer Centre once a large (involving 50% of the lumen) anorectal pigmented lesion was identified. A complete colonoscopy and biopsy confirmed an anorectal melanoma that extends proximally up to 7 cm from the anal verge into the rectal mucosa.

Background The previous OpACIN and OpACIN-neo studies investigating neoadjuvant IPI plus NIVO have demonstrated high pathologic response rates (74–78%) and favorable long-term outcomes for patients (pts) with a pathological response; at 36 and 18 months follow up only 1/71 (1.4%) responders has relapsed. In contrast, pathological non-responders have a poor prognosis; 15/23 (65.2%) have relapsed so far. This emphasizes the need for baseline biomarkers predictive of non-response and new neoadjuvant treatment combinations for these pts. In our previous studies, baseline IFN-γ signature high pts were more likely to respond to IPI plus NIVO. The DONIMI study tests the combination of NIVO ± IPI combined with a class 1 histone deacetylase inhibitor, domatinostat (DOM), according to the pts IFN-γ signature. We have developed a neoadjuvant IFN-γ signature, based on the signature previously described by Ayers et al., that will be used for the first time to classify pts in this prospective trial. Trial design This two-center investigator-initiated phase 1b study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of neoadjuvant NIVO ± DOM ± IPI in 45 stage III melanoma pts with macroscopic de-novo or recurrent disease. IFN-γ signature high pts (n=20) will be randomized (stratified by center) to Arm A (2 cycles NIVO 240 mg q3wk) or Arm B (2 cycles NIVO 240 mg q3wk + DOM 200 mg twice daily (BID), d1-14, q3wk). IFN-γ signature low pts (n=25) will be randomized to Arm C (2 cycles NIVO 240 mg q3wk + DOM 200 mg BID, d1-14, q3wk) or Arm D (2 cycles NIVO 240 mg q3wk + IPI 80 mg q3wk + DOM 200 mg once daily (OD), d1-14, q3wk). Based on safety data of the first 5 pts in arm D, the remaining pts will be treated with either a higher dosing scheme (200 mg BID, d1-14, q3wks), a lower dosing scheme (100 mg OD, d1-14, q3wks) or the same dosing scheme (200 mg OD, d1-14, q3wks). The primary endpoint is safety and feasibility. A treatment arm will be declared as not feasible if 2/5 or 3/10 patients cannot adhere to the planned time of surgery (week 6 ± 1week) due to treatment-related adverse events. Biopsies (week 0, 3), blood samples (week 0, 3, 6, 12) and feces (week 0, 3, 6) will be collected for translational research. To date, 7 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information NCT04133948 Disclosure Information I.L.M. Reijers: None. E.A. Rozeman: None. P. Dimitriadis: None. O. Krijgsman: C. Other Research Support (supplies, equipment, receipt of drugs or other in-kind support); Modest; BMS. L.J.W. Bosch: None. S. Cornelissen: None. J. Bouwman: None. J.M. Versluis: None. D. Rao: None. B. van de Wiel: None. A.J. Spillane: None. R.A. Scolyer: F. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; MSD, Neracare, Myriad, Novartis. A.M. Menzies: F. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; BMS, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche. A.C.J. van Akkooi: B. Research Grant (principal investigator, collaborator or consultant and pending grants as well as grants already received); Modest; Amgen, BMS, Novartis. F. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; Amgen, BMS, Novartis, MSD, Merck, Merck-Pfizer, 4SC. G.V. Long: F. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; Aduro, Amgen, BMS, Mass-Array, Pierre-Fabre, Novartis, Merck MSD, Roche. C.U. Blank: B. Research Grant (principal investigator, collaborator or consultant and pending grants as well as grants already received); Modest; BMS, Novartis, Nanostring. F. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, GSK, AZ, Pfizer, Lilly, Genmab, Pierre Fabre.

Background Before adjuvant checkpoint inhibition the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was poor ( Materials and Methods The phase 1b OpACIN trial included 20 stage IIIB/IIIC melanoma patients, which were randomized to receive IPI 3 mg/kg plus NIVO 1 mg/kg either adjuvant 4 cycles or split 2 cycles neoadjuvant and 2 adjuvant. In the phase 2 OpACIN-neo trial, 86 patients were randomized to 2 cycles neoadjuvant treatment, either in arm A: 2x IPI 3 mg/kg plus NIVO 1 mg/kg q3w (n=30), arm B: 2x IPI 1 mg/kg plus NIVO 3 mg/kg q3w (n=30), or arm C: 2x IPI 3 mg/kg q3w followed immediately by 2x NIVO 3 mg/kg q3w (n=26). Pathologic response was defined as Results Only 1 of 71 (1.4%) patients with a pathologic response on neoadjuvant therapy had relapsed, versus 16 of 23 patients (69.6%) without a pathologic response, after a median follow-up of 36 months for the OpACIN and 24 months for the OpACIN-neo trial. In the OpACIN trial, the estimated 3-year RFS rate for the neoadjuvant arm was 80% (95% CI: 59%-100%) versus 60% (95% CI: 36%-100%) for the adjuvant arm. Median RFS was not reached for any of the arms within the OpACIN-neo trial. Estimated 24-months RFS rate was 84% for all patients (95% CI: 76%-92%); 90% for arm A (95% CI: 80%-100%), 78% for arm B (95% CI: 63%-96%) and 83% for arm C (95% CI: 70%-100%). Baseline interferon-γ gene expression score and tumor mutational burden predict response. Conclusions OpACIN for the first time showed a potential benefit of neoadjuvant IPI plus NIVO versus adjuvant immunotherapy, whereas the OpACIN-neo trial confirmed the high pathologic response rates that can be achieved by neoadjuvant IPI plus NIVO. Both trials show that pathologic response can function as a surrogate markers for RFS. Clinical trial information NCT02437279, NCT02977052 Disclosure Information J.M. Versluis: None. E.A. Rozeman: None. A.M. Menzies: F. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; BMS, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Pierre-Fabre. I.L.M. Reijers: None. O. Krijgsman: B. Research Grant (principal investigator, collaborator or consultant and pending grants as well as grants already received); Modest; BMS. E.P. Hoefsmit: None. B.A. van de Wiel: None. K. Sikorska: None. C. Bierman: None. P. Dimitriadis: None. M. Gonzalez: None. A. Broeks: None. R.M. Kerkhoven: None. A.J. Spillane: None. J.B.A.G. Haanen: B. Research Grant (principal investigator, collaborator or consultant and pending grants as well as grants already received); Modest; BMS, MSD, Neon Therapeutics, Novartis. F. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, AZ/MedImmune, Rocher/Genentech, Ipsen, Bayer, Immunocore, SeattleGenetics, Neon Therapeutics, Celsius Therapeutics, Gadet, GSK. W.J. van Houdt: None. R.P.M. Saw: None. H. Eriksson: None. A.C.J. van Akkooi: B. Research Grant (principal investigator, collaborator or consultant and pending grants as well as grants already received); Modest; Amgen, BMS, Novartis. F. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; Amgen, BMS, Novartis, MSD Merck, Merck-Pfizer, 4SC. R.A. Scolyer: F. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; MSD, Neracare, Myriad, Novartis. T.N. Schumacher: B. Research Grant (principal investigator, collaborator or consultant and pending grants as well as grants already received); Modest; MSD, BMS, Merck. E. Ownership Interest (stock, stock options, patent or other intellectual property); Modest; AIMM Therapeutics, Allogene Therapeutics, Amgen, Merus, Neogene Therapeutics, Neon Therapeutics. F. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; Adaptive Biotechnologies, AIMM Therapeutics, Allogene Therapeutics, Amgen, Merus, Neon Therapeutics, Scenic Biotech. Other; Modest; Third Rock Ventures. G.V. Long: F. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; Aduro, Amgen, BMS, Mass-Array, Pierre-Fabre, Novartis, Merck MSD, Roche. C.U. Blank: B. Research Grant (principal investigator, collaborator or consultant and pending grants as well as grants already received); Modest; BMS, Novartis, NanoString. E. Ownership Interest (stock, stock options, patent or other intellectual property); Modest; Uniti Cars, Neon Therapeutics, Forty Seven. F. Consultant/Advisory Board; Modest; BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, GSK, AZ, Pfizer, Lilly, GenMab, Pierre-Fabre.

Tremendous progress has been made in treating patients with metastatic melanoma over the past decade. In that timeframe, the FDA has approved 12 novel treatments for patients with advanced unresectable melanoma, comprising both kinase-targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), and five treatments for adjuvant (postoperative) use in patients with high-risk resectable stage III melanoma. It is not known whether outcomes can be further improved by administering kinase inhibitors or ICI in the neoadjuvant (presurgical) setting in patients with high-risk resectable melanomas. Noting research community interest in exploring the neoadjuvant approach for treating melanoma and recognizing that early harmonization of methodologies may expedite the development of therapeutics in this space, the FDA and Melanoma Research Alliance convened a public workshop on November 6, 2019, in National Harbor, Maryland, to discuss key issues. The workshop consisted of 23 faculty and included more than 250 live participants. Topics discussed included opportunities for advancing novel endpoints for regulatory purposes as well as translational research, clinical trial design considerations, and strategies for optimizing patient selection while mitigating risk.

Background With the approval of adjuvant therapy for stage III melanoma, accurate staging is more important than ever. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is an accurate staging tool, yet the presence of capsular nevi (CN) can lead to a false-positive diagnosis. Patients and methods Retrospective analysis of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition stage IIIA melanoma patients who were treated at our institute between 2000 and 2015. SNB slides were reviewed for this study by an expert melanoma pathologist. Results Of 159 eligible patients, 14 originally diagnosed with metastatic melanoma merely had CN (8.8%). Another two merely had melanophages (1.3%). Thus, 10.1% of SNs were considered false positive after revision. In 12 patients, the SN tumor burden was originally reported as larger than 1 mm but turned out to be less than 1 mm. Four patients originally reported as SN tumor burden less than 1 mm before revision turned out to have larger than 1 mm. These patients might have been over- or undertreated in the current era of adjuvant therapy for stage III melanoma. Conclusions Distinguishing metastatic melanoma from benign CN and melanophages can be a diagnostic challenge. We plead for an expert pathologists' review, especially when using the SNB + results to determine treatment consequences.

BACKGROUND In the previously reported primary analysis of this phase 3 trial, 12 months of adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib resulted in significantly longer relapse-free survival than placebo in patients with resected stage III melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations. To confirm the stability of the relapse-free survival benefit, longer-term data were needed. METHODS We randomly assigned 870 patients who had resected stage III melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations to receive 12 months of oral dabrafenib (at a dose of 150 mg twice daily) plus trametinib (2 mg once daily) or two matched placebos. The primary end point was relapse-free survival. Here, we report 5-year results for relapse-free survival and survival without distant metastasis as the site of the first relapse. Overall survival was not analyzed, since the required number of events to trigger the final overall survival analysis had not been reached. RESULTS The minimum duration of follow-up was 59 months (median patient follow-up, 60 months for dabrafenib plus trametinib and 58 months for placebo). At 5 years, the percentage of patients who were alive without relapse was 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48 to 58) with dabrafenib plus trametinib and 36% (95% CI, 32 to 41) with placebo (hazard ratio for relapse or death, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.61). The percentage of patients who were alive without distant metastasis was 65% (95% CI, 61 to 71) with dabrafenib plus trametinib and 54% (95% CI, 49 to 60) with placebo (hazard ratio for distant metastasis or death, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.70). No clinically meaningful between-group difference in the incidence or severity of serious adverse events was reported during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS In the 5-year follow-up of a phase 3 trial involving patients who had resected stage III melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations, 12 months of adjuvant therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib resulted in a longer duration of survival without relapse or distant metastasis than placebo with no apparent long-term toxic effects. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis; COMBI-AD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01682083; EudraCT number, 2012-001266-15.).

International audience; Background: Adoptive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) therapy and interleukin-2 (IL-2) have been investigated in melanoma.Aim: To confirm previously observed preventive effects of TIL + IL2 in a subgroup of patients with relapsing metastatic stage III melanoma.Methodology: Open-label, randomized two-group, multicenter five-year trial in adult stage III melanoma patients with only one invaded lymph node after complete resection. Patients received TIL + IL2 or abstention. TIL + IL2 was administered within 8 weeks after lymph node resection and 4 weeks after. Disease-free survival was assessed every 2 months up to month 18, every 3 months up to month 36 and every 4 months up to 5 years. A once-a-year follow-up was scheduled beyond the five-year follow-up. Safety was assessed throughout the trial.Results: Overall, 49 patients accounted for the modified intent-to-treat and 47 for the PP. Slightly more male than female patients participated; mean age was 57.7 ± 11.4 years in the TIL + IL2 group and 53.5 ± 13.0 years in the abstention group. After 5 years of follow-up, 11/26 patients in the TIL + IL2 group and 13/23 in the abstention group had relapsed. There was no statistical difference between the groups (HR: 0.63 CI 95% [0.28-1.41], p = 0.258), nine patients in the TIL + IL2 and 11 in the abstention group died with no significant difference between the two groups (HR: 0.65 CI95% [0.27 - 1.59], p = 0.34). Safety was good.Conclusion: We did not confirm results of a previous trial. However, ulceration of the primary melanoma may be considered predictive of the efficacy of TIL in melanoma in adjuvant setting, in a manner similar to interferon α.

The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic importance of lymph node ratio (LNR) in stage III melanoma after complete lymph nodal dissections. From European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized trials 18871, 18952, and 18991, 2358 patients had full information on positive and examined lymph nodes (LNs) and were included. Cox proportional hazards models stratified by trial were used to assess the prognostic impact of LNR adjusted for confounders on melanoma-specific survival. Optimal cutoff values for LNR were calculated for each LN dissection site (axillary, inguinal, and neck). LNR (≥ vs.35%: hazard ratio=1.44, 95% confidence interval: 1.23-1.69) and number of positive LNs appeared to be of independent strong prognostic importance. Dissection sites impacted the optimal LNR cutoff: 35% for axillary, 40% for inguinal, and 50% for neck dissections. Combining these into one 'high versus low LNR' resulted in a highly significant multivariately adjusted hazard ratio of 1.48 (95% confidence interval: 1.26-1.74). In subgroup analyses, LNR was only significant in advanced disease (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage N2b, N3; IIIC). LNR was most significant for inguinal dissections, followed by axillary dissections, but seemed less useful in neck dissections. LNR is an independent significant prognostic factor in stage III melanoma patients. Our study showed higher than previously reported cutoffs that differed per dissection site. However, because of conflicting results compared with other studies and apparent limited prognostic impact confined to subgroups, the practical use of LNR seems limited.

Melanoma is a form of skin cancer that is frequently diagnosed at early stages. In most cases, surgical resection is curative. In case of thicker melanomas (> pT1b) without clinical or instrumental evidence of metastasis, a sentinel lymph node biopsy is recommended for staging purposes. If the lymph nodes are the only site of disease (macroscopic or microscopic> 1mm), configuring stage III, the international guidelines recommend the use of adjuvant therapy with checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) or targeted therapies (dabrafenib plus trametinib). These drugs have shown a significant increase in recurrence-free survival, although some doubts and open questions remain. Specifically, none of the available treatments has shown a clear benefit in the overall survival rates, the advantages they give in stage IIIA are not well known, and finally there are still no prospective clinical studies identifying the best approach to continue the therapeutic process in case of relapse. Furthermore, there are new opportunities opening up with the upcoming results of the neoadjuvant trials that could revolutionize the treatment of clinically evident stage III melanoma.

A 51-year old woman with stage III melanoma participated in a phase II clinical trial in which she received subcutaneous rhGM-CSF injections for 3 years. She was in remission by the end of the trial. Seven months after discontinuing GM-CSF she had her first MS event. The unique timeline of rh-GM-CSF injections in a melanoma trial, during which yearly MRI scans showed subtle stable demyelination followed by RRMS onset shortly after discontinuation of treatment, may provide some insight on the role of GM-CSF in MS.

Purpose: There is a need for sensitive, reproducible biomarkers for patients with stage III melanoma to guide clinical decision making. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can be detected in patients with melanoma; however, there are limited data regarding their significance in stage III disease. The aim of this study was to determine whether CTCs are associated with early relapse in stage III melanoma. Experimental Design: We prospectively assessed CTCs at first presentation in clinic (baseline) for 243 patients with stage III melanoma. CTCs were measured using the CellSearch System. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was compared between patients with one or more baseline CTC versus those with no CTCs. Log-rank test and Cox regression analysis were applied to establish associations of CTCs with RFS. Results: At least one baseline CTC was identified in 90 of 243 (37%) patients. Forty-five (19%), 67 (28%), 118 (49%), and 13 (5%) patients were stage IIIA, IIIB, IIIC, or IIID, respectively. CTC detection was not associated with substage, or primary tumor characteristics. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the detection of ≥1 baseline CTC was significantly associated with decreased 6-month RFS [log-rank, P < 0.0001; HR, 3.62, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.78–7.36; P < 0.0001] and 54-month RFS (log-rank, P = 0.01; HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.13–2.54; P = 0.01). Conclusions: ≥1 CTC was independently associated with melanoma relapse, suggesting that CTC assessment may be useful to identify patients at risk for relapse who could derive benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported that one of the authors, Corrado Caracò, has been accidentally omitted from the author list. In this Correction the author has been added to the author list.

Even though both the involvement of regional lymph nodes and the number of metastatic lymph nodes are regarded as major determinants of survival in cutaneous melanoma, the extent of node dissection has been analyzed as an independent prognostic indicator in only a few studies. This study aims to determine how the extent of lymph node excision (EN) might predict the disease relapse and survival in melanoma.A total of 317 patients with stage III melanoma were included in the study and reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the number of the excised lymph nodes: EN1 for fewer than 10 and EN2 for 10 or more lymph nodes removed.The median number of positive nodes was 1 (range, 1-32). The largest group was N1 (52.4%), which was followed by N2 (29.6%) and N3 (18%). The median number of EN was 13 (range, 1-73). The patients were allocated to EN1 and EN2 as follows: 31.9% and 68.1%, respectively. The rates of EN2 patients were 62.2%, 72.2%, and 78.2% in N1, N2, and N3, respectively. For all patients, the estimated 5- and 10-year relapse-free survival rates were 41% and 39%, respectively; and the estimated 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 51% and 42%, respectively. Extension of lymph node excision was found to be not prognostic for relapse and survival (P = 0.55 and P = 0.88, respectively).Extension of lymph node excision has no impact on relapse and survival of stage III cutaneous melanomas.

BACKGROUND Comorbidity burden is associated with development of cancer, stage at diagnosis, and treatment outcomes. We evaluated the association between comorbidity burden, receipt of adjuvant immunotherapy, and survival in patients with stage III melanoma. METHODS Using the National Cancer Database, we identified 16,906 patients with stage III melanoma who underwent surgery of the primary site. Outcomes included receipt of adjuvant immunotherapy and overall survival; independent variables included Charlson/Deyo comorbidity index (CDI) and receipt of adjuvant immunotherapy. RESULTS Patients with CDI scores of two or more averaged 30.0% and 30.9% lower adjusted odds of receiving adjuvant immunotherapy relative to patients with a CDI score of zero or one, respectively (P = 0.001 and 0.002, respectively). Longer survival was associated with lower CDI scores (all P

Objectives: Pathological stage III melanoma patients have variable clinical presentation and outcome when divided by substages, and the number of metastatic lymph nodes is the most significant inde...

Aims: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant pembrolizumab relative to observation alone following complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma with lymph node involvement, from a US ...

International audience; Improved knowledge of sentinel node procedures coupled with the results of adjuvant clinical trials in stage III melanoma have prompted the French Cutaneous Oncology Group to propose new guidelines for the management of stage III melanoma. These guidelines comply with the principles of the evidence-based medicine.

9582 Background: In the COMBI-AD trial (NCT01682083), 12 mo of adjuvant D+T led to significant improvement of RFS vs PBO (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; P < .001) in pts with resected BRAF V600–mutant stage III melanoma; 3- and 4-year RFS rates were 59% and 54%, respectively. Previous results demonstrated consistent treatment benefit across baseline disease stage according to AJCC edition 7 or 8. Here, we further explored the association between baseline disease characteristics and RFS to identify pt subgroups likely to benefit from adjuvant treatment. Methods: Randomized pts with completely resected BRAF V600E/K–mutant stage III melanoma received 12 mo of adjuvant D (150 mg BID) + T (2 mg QD) or PBO. Within each subgroup, predictive value was explored using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and HRs were calculated using a Pike estimator. Results: Minimum follow-up was 40 mo for 870 enrolled pts (D+T, 438; PBO, 432). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated treatment benefit across all subgroups analyzed. Assessment of RFS by extent of primary tumor (T stage) showed consistent benefit favoring D+T vs PBO (HR [95% CI]; T1, 0.42 [0.25-0.70]; T2, 0.51 [0.34-0.76]; T3, 0.55 [0.39-0.77]; T4, 0.42 [0.29-0.60]). HRs by nodal burden (N stage) also showed consistent treatment benefit (N1, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.37-0.72]; N2, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.28-0.53]; N3, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.41-0.83]). Substantial treatment benefit was observed in pts with baseline in-transit metastases (HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.24-0.82]) and those with no in-transit metastases detected at baseline (HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.40-0.60]). When RFS was assessed according to melanoma presentation, treatment benefit favoring D+T vs PBO was observed in pts with superficial spreading melanoma (HR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.35-0.66]) and those with nodular melanoma (HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.37-0.75]). Conclusions: These results confirm earlier findings showing that treatment benefit with adjuvant D+T vs PBO is independent of baseline factors. Clinical trial information: NCT01682083.

Objective: To determine the efficacy of pembrolizumab relative to other treatments used in stage III melanoma by conducting a systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods: A SLR was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating approved adjuvant treatments including interferon-containing regimens, BRAF-inhibitors, and PD-L1 inhibitors in stage III melanoma patients. Relative treatment effects for recurrence-free survival (RFS) were synthesized with Bayesian NMA models that allowed for hazard ratios (HRs) to vary over time. Results: Included studies formed a connected network of evidence composed of eight trials. In high-risk stage III patients, the HR for pembrolizumab vs observation decreased significantly over time with the superiority of pembrolizumab over observation becoming statistically meaningful before 3 months. By 9 months, the HR for pembrolizumab vs observation was statistically significantly lower than the HR for most other treatments vs observation, with the exception of ipilimumab and biochemotherapy due to overlapping 95% credible intervals. In BRAF + patients, pembrolizumab was statistically significantly better than observation after 3 months. The HR for both BRAF-inhibitors vs observation increased significantly over time and pembrolizumab was statistically superior to both BRAF-inhibitors after 15 months. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab results in statistically significantly improved RFS compared to all competing regimens after 9 months, except ipilimumab and biochemotherapy, for the adjuvant treatment of stage III melanoma. However, point estimate HRs vs observation for pembrolizumab are much lower than those for ipilimumab. In BRAF + patients, the advantage of pembrolizumab versus competing interventions increases over time with respect to RFS.