1. Cervical cancer screening using HPV tests on self-samples: attitudes and preferences of women participating in the VALHUDES study
- Author
-
E. Peeters, Marc Arbyn, Gilbert G.G. Donders, Steven Weyers, Philippe De Sutter, Severien Van Keer, Alex Vorsters, Davy Vanden Broeck, Jean Doyen, Wiebren A.A. Tjalma, Hélène De Pauw, Clinical sciences, and Centre for Reproductive Medicine - Gynaecology
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Human papillomavirus ,HPV ,Psychological intervention ,Urine ,Cervical cancer screening ,papillomavirus ,KITS ,Preferences ,Obstetrics and Gynaecology ,Medicine and Health Sciences ,medicine ,Sampling (medicine) ,Public, Environmental & Occupational Health ,Cervical cancer ,Science & Technology ,BARRIERS ,Self-sampling ,Obstetrics ,business.industry ,Research ,Public health ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,EFFICACY ,medicine.disease ,PREVENTION ,urine ,Specimen collection ,VALHUDES ,Attitudes ,oncology ,Screening ,VACCINATION ,Human medicine ,Public aspects of medicine ,RA1-1270 ,business ,Life Sciences & Biomedicine ,Human - Abstract
Background Interventions to reach women who do not participate regularly in screening may reduce the risk of cervical cancer. Self-collection of a vaginal specimen has been shown to increase participation. The relative clinical accuracy of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on first-void urine (with Colli-Pee) and on vaginal self-samples versus on cervical clinician-collected samples is being investigated in the VALHUDES trial. The current study assesses attitudes and experiences regarding self-sampling among women enrolled in VALHUDES. Methods Questionnaires from 515 women (age 25–64 years [N = 498]; N = 10], age ≥ 65 [N = 3], enrolled between December 2017 - January 2020) referred to colposcopy because of previous cervical abnormalities and enrolled in VALHUDES (NCT03064087) were analysed. Results Of the 515 participants, nearly all women confirmed that self-sampling may help in reaching under-screened women (93%). Nevertheless, 44% of the participants stated before starting collection that a clinician-collected sample is more effective than a self-collected sample. After self-sampling, the large majority of women (> 95%) declared that instructions for self-collection were clear, that collection was easy, and that they were confident about having performed the procedure correctly, for both urine and vaginal collection. However, a proportion of women found self-sampling unpleasant (9.5% [49/515] for urine collection; 18.6% [96/515] and 15.5% [80/515] for vaginal sampling with cotton swabs or plastic brushes, respectively). For their next screening round, 57% would prefer self-sampling whereas 41% opted for collection by a clinician. Among women preferring self-sampling, 53% would choose for urine collection, 38% for vaginal self-collection and 9% had no preference. Age did not modify preferences. Conclusion We conclude that both urine and vaginal self-sampling are well accepted by women, with a preference for urine sampling. Although the large majority of women are confident in their ability to perform self-sampling, four to five over ten women preferred specimen collection by a clinician. Trial registration The study VALHUDES was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03064087).
- Published
- 2021