1. Supine versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Complex Stones: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
- Author
-
Fabio C. Vicentini, Fabio Cesar Miranda Torricelli, William C. Nahas, Rodrigo Perrella, David Cohen, Joaquim F.A. Claro, Manoj Monga, Alexandre Danilovic, Guido Giusti, Miguel Srougi, Eliane D. Paro, Daniel B. Ferreira, Claudio Bovolenta Murta, Giovani S. Marchini, Carlos Batagello, Eduardo Mazzucchi, and Priscila Kuriki Vieira Mota
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Supine position ,business.industry ,Urology ,medicine.medical_treatment ,medicine.disease ,law.invention ,Surgery ,Prone position ,Primary outcome ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Statistical significance ,medicine ,Operative time ,Kidney stones ,business ,Percutaneous nephrolithotomy - Abstract
PURPOSE High-quality evidence comparing supine to prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of complex stones is lacking. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of supine position (SUP) and prone position (PRO) PCNL. MATERIALS AND METHODS A noninferior randomized controlled trial was performed according to the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials) criteria. The inclusion criteria were patients over 18 years of age with complex stones. SUP was performed in the Barts flank-free modified position. Except for positioning, all the surgical parameters were identical. The primary outcome was the difference in the success rate on the first postoperative day (POD1) between groups. The secondary outcome was the difference in the stone-free rate (SFR) on the 90th postoperative day (final SFR). A noninferiority margin of 15% was used. Demographic, operative, and safety variables were compared between the groups. Statistical significance was set at p
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF