Back to Search Start Over

A comprehensive literature-based equation to compare cost-effectiveness of a flexible ureteroscopy program with single-use versus reusable devices

Authors :
Carlos Batagello
Miguel Srougi
Manoj Monga
Fabio C. Vicentini
William C. Nahas
Alexandre Danilovic
Fabio Cesar Miranda Torricelli
Eduardo Mazzucchi
Giovanni Scala Marchini
Source :
International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology, vol 45, iss 4, International braz j urol v.45 n.4 2019, International Braz J Urol, Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU), instacron:SBU, International braz j urol, Volume: 45, Issue: 4, Pages: 658-670, Published: 02 SEP 2019, International Brazilian Journal of Urology, Vol 45, Iss 4, Pp 658-670
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
FapUNIFESP (SciELO), 2019.

Abstract

Author(s): Marchini, Giovanni S; Torricelli, Fabio C; Batagello, Carlos A; Monga, Manoj; Vicentini, Fabio C; Danilovic, Alexandre; Srougi, Miguel; Nahas, William C; Mazzucchi, Eduardo | Abstract: PurposeTo critically review all literature concerning the cost-effectiveness of flexible ureteroscopy comparing single-use with reusable scopes.Materials and methodsA systematic online literature review was performed in PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar databases. All factors potentially affecting surgical costs or clinical outcomes were considered. Prospective assessments, case control and case series studies were included.Results741 studies were found. Of those, 18 were duplicated and 77 were not related to urology procedures. Of the remaining 646 studies, 59 were considered of relevance and selected for further analysis. Stone free and complication rates were similar between single-use and reusable scopes. Operative time was in average 20% shorter with digital scopes, single-use or not. Reusable digital scopes seem to last longer than optic ones, though scope longevity is very variable worldwide. New scopes usually last four times more than refurbished ones and single-use ureterorenoscopes have good resilience throughout long cases. Longer scope longevity is achieved with Cidex and if a dedicated nurse takes care of the sterilization process. The main surgical factors that negatively impact device longevity are lower pole pathologies, large stone burden and non-use of a ureteral access sheath. We have built a comprehensive fi nancial costeffective decision model to fl exible ureteroscope acquisition.ConclusionsThe cost-effectiveness of a fl exible ureteroscopy program is dependent of several aspects. We have developed a equation to allow a literature-based and adaptable decision model to every interested stakeholder. Disposable devices are already a reality and will progressively become the standard as manufacturing price falls.

Details

ISSN :
16776119 and 16775538
Volume :
45
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
International braz j urol
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....90da4f042709ea4ddc448ccfc0e47241
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0880