Back to Search
Start Over
A comprehensive literature-based equation to compare cost-effectiveness of a flexible ureteroscopy program with single-use versus reusable devices
- Source :
- International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology, vol 45, iss 4, International braz j urol v.45 n.4 2019, International Braz J Urol, Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU), instacron:SBU, International braz j urol, Volume: 45, Issue: 4, Pages: 658-670, Published: 02 SEP 2019, International Brazilian Journal of Urology, Vol 45, Iss 4, Pp 658-670
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO), 2019.
-
Abstract
- Author(s): Marchini, Giovanni S; Torricelli, Fabio C; Batagello, Carlos A; Monga, Manoj; Vicentini, Fabio C; Danilovic, Alexandre; Srougi, Miguel; Nahas, William C; Mazzucchi, Eduardo | Abstract: PurposeTo critically review all literature concerning the cost-effectiveness of flexible ureteroscopy comparing single-use with reusable scopes.Materials and methodsA systematic online literature review was performed in PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar databases. All factors potentially affecting surgical costs or clinical outcomes were considered. Prospective assessments, case control and case series studies were included.Results741 studies were found. Of those, 18 were duplicated and 77 were not related to urology procedures. Of the remaining 646 studies, 59 were considered of relevance and selected for further analysis. Stone free and complication rates were similar between single-use and reusable scopes. Operative time was in average 20% shorter with digital scopes, single-use or not. Reusable digital scopes seem to last longer than optic ones, though scope longevity is very variable worldwide. New scopes usually last four times more than refurbished ones and single-use ureterorenoscopes have good resilience throughout long cases. Longer scope longevity is achieved with Cidex and if a dedicated nurse takes care of the sterilization process. The main surgical factors that negatively impact device longevity are lower pole pathologies, large stone burden and non-use of a ureteral access sheath. We have built a comprehensive fi nancial costeffective decision model to fl exible ureteroscope acquisition.ConclusionsThe cost-effectiveness of a fl exible ureteroscopy program is dependent of several aspects. We have developed a equation to allow a literature-based and adaptable decision model to every interested stakeholder. Disposable devices are already a reality and will progressively become the standard as manufacturing price falls.
- Subjects :
- Cost effectiveness
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Urology
Operative Time
030232 urology & nephrology
Review Article
lcsh:RC870-923
Kidney Calculi
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Ureteroscopy
Equipment Reuse
Humans
Medicine
Operations management
Relevance (information retrieval)
URETEROSCOPE
medicine.diagnostic_test
Scope (project management)
Cost–benefit analysis
business.industry
Equipment Design
Urology & Nephrology
lcsh:Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology
Variable (computer science)
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Ureteroscopes
business
Decision model
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 16776119 and 16775538
- Volume :
- 45
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- International braz j urol
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....90da4f042709ea4ddc448ccfc0e47241
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0880