Search

BACKGROUND: Insulin is a key regulator of metabolic function. The effects of excess adiposity, insulin resistance, and hepatic steatosis on the complex integration of insulin secretion and hepatic and extrahepatic tissue extraction are not clear. METHODS: A hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp and a 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test were performed to evaluate insulin sensitivity and insulin kinetics after glucose ingestion in 3 groups: (a) lean subjects with normal intrahepatic triglyceride (IHTG) and glucose tolerance (lean-NL; n = 14), (b) obese subjects with normal IHTG and glucose tolerance (obese-NL; n = 24), and (c) obese subjects with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and prediabetes (obese-NAFLD; n = 22). RESULTS: Insulin sensitivity progressively decreased and insulin secretion progressively increased from the lean-NL to the obese-NL to the obese-NAFLD groups. Fractional hepatic insulin extraction progressively decreased from the lean-NL to the obese-NL to the obese-NAFLD groups, whereas total hepatic insulin extraction (molar amount removed) was greater in the obese-NL and obese-NAFLD subjects than in the lean-NL subjects. Insulin appearance in the systemic circulation and extrahepatic insulin extraction progressively increased from the lean-NL to the obese-NL to the obese-NAFLD groups. Total hepatic insulin extraction plateaued at high rates of insulin delivery, whereas the relationship between systemic insulin appearance and total extrahepatic extraction was linear. CONCLUSION: Hyperinsulinemia after glucose ingestion in obese-NL and obese-NAFLD is due to an increase in insulin secretion, without a decrease in total hepatic or extrahepatic insulin extraction. However, the liver’s maximum capacity to remove insulin is limited because of a saturable extraction process. The increase in insulin delivery to the liver and extrahepatic tissues in obese-NAFLD is unable to compensate for the increase in insulin resistance, resulting in impaired glucose homeostasis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02706262. FUNDING: NIH grants DK56341 (Nutrition Obesity Research Center), DK052574 (Digestive Disease Research Center), RR024992 (Clinical and Translational Science Award), and T32 DK007120 (a T32 Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award); the American Diabetes Foundation (1-18-ICTS-119); Janssen Research & Development; and the Pershing Square Foundation.

AIM To evaluate the impact of the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor canagliflozin on intrahepatic triglyceride (IHTG) accumulation and its relationship to changes in body weight and glucose metabolism. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, 24-week trial subjects with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; HbA1c = 7.7% ± 0.7%) from two centres were randomly assigned (1:1) to canagliflozin 300 mg or placebo. We measured IHTG by proton-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (primary outcome), hepatic/muscle/adipose tissue insulin sensitivity during a 2-step euglycaemic insulin clamp, and beta-cell function during a mixed meal tolerance test. Analyses were per protocol. RESULTS Between 8 September 2014-13 June 2016, 56 patients were enrolled. Canagliflozin reduced HbA1c (placebo-subtracted change: -0.71% [-1.08; -0.33]) and body weight (-3.4% [-5.4; -1.4]; both P ≤ 0.001). A numerically larger absolute decrease in IHTG occurred with canagliflozin (-4.6% [-6.4; -2.7]) versus placebo (-2.4% [-4.2; -0.6]; P = 0.09). In patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (n = 37), the decrease in IHTG was -6.9% (-9.5; -4.2) versus -3.8% (-6.3; -1.3; P = 0.05), and strongly correlated with the magnitude of weight loss (r = 0.69, P < 0.001). Body weight loss ≥5% with a ≥30% relative reduction in IHTG occurred more often with canagliflozin (38% vs. 7%, P = 0.009). Hepatic insulin sensitivity improved with canagliflozin (P < 0.01), but not muscle or adipose tissue insulin sensitivity. Beta-cell glucose sensitivity, insulin clearance, and disposition index improved more with canagliflozin (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Canagliflozin improves hepatic insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion and clearance in patients with T2DM. IHTG decreases in proportion to the magnitude of body weight loss, which tended to be greater and occur more often with canagliflozin.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) ranges in severity from steatosis to NASH. NASH, which is characterized by steatosis, ballooning, inflammation (NAFLD Activity Score [NAS]), and frequently fibrosis, can progress to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Despite the unmet medical needs of NASH leading to end stage liver disease and increased risk for cardiovascular death, there are no approved treatments to date. In clinical trials, pioglitazone treatment (6-24 months) has led to NASH resolution and/or reduction in fibrosis. We developed a cynomolgus monkey (cyno) model of NASH by feeding a high fat/cholesterol diet for 2+ years and demonstrated accelerated disease progression by adding fructose to this diet. A total of 31 obese (mean±SD, 10.4±1.8 kg), insulin resistant (HOMA-IR: 29±32) cynos with NASH were used. Histological assessments of liver biopsies were used to characterize disease progression and response to therapy and compared to human studies. Baseline NAS of 5.6±0.9 was similar to those in NASH patients, whereas baseline fibrosis scores of 1.2±0.5 were slightly lower than values of ∼2 typically enrolled in Phase 2 trials. Cynos were treated daily with vehicle (n=10) or pioglitazone (3 mg/kg; n=21) for 6 months. Drug exposures 24 hours post-dose averaged 233±145 ng/mL, similar to that seen in humans (∼200 ng/mL) dosed with 45 mg. Adiponectin, a biomarker for PPARγ activation, increased ∼2-fold in treated cynos. NAS improvement (a decrease in NAS of ≥2 with changes in 2 or more components of NAS) was seen in 30% of treated cynos (p=0.08). No vehicle animals showed NAS improvement. Treated cynos showed significant decreases in ballooning, trends in decreases (p=0.07) in steatosis and inflammation, but no change in fibrosis whereas vehicle animals showed no changes or worsening. We have validated and benchmarked a novel cyno model for NASH that has characteristics similar to human pathology and responds to a treatment known to improve NASH in clinical trials. Disclosure R. Camacho: Employee; Self; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. D. Polidori: Employee; Self; Janssen Research and Development. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Janssen Research and Development. T. Chen: Employee; Self; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. B. Gao: Employee; Self; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. P. Wong: Employee; Self; Johnson & Johnson. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Merck & Co., Inc. J.A. Gabriel: Employee; Self; Kunming Biomed International (KBI). E. Zhu: None. T. Wang: None. A.R. Nawrocki: Employee; Self; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Occasional bursts of discovery and innovation have appeared during the otherwise stagnant past several decades of drug development in nephrology. Among other recent drug discoveries, the unexpected kidney benefits observed with sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors may herald a renaissance of drug development in kidney disease. This recent progress highlights the need to further promote and stimulate research and development of promising therapies that may ameliorate the morbidity and mortality associated with kidney disease. To help identify and address barriers to drug development in nephrology, the Duke Clinical Research Institute convened a conference in April 2019 that included stakeholders from academia, industry, government agencies, and patient advocacy. From these discussions, several opportunities were identified to improve every stage of drug development for kidney disease from early discovery to implementation into practice. Key topics reviewed in this article are the utility of interconnected data and site research networks, surrogate end points, pragmatic and adaptive trial designs, the promising uses of real-world data, and methods to improve the generalizability of trial results and uptake of approved drugs for kidney-related diseases.

AIMS. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) has been associated with reduced endogenous insulin clearance (EIC) and hepatic insulin resistance (HIRI). These relationships, however, might be differentially affected by the ethnic background, as populations of African ancestry are typically featured with reduced intrahepatic fat content (HFF%) but impaired EIC. Therefore, we evaluated the influence of the ethnicity on the relationships between HFF%, EIC and HIRI. METHODS. The HFF% was quantified by magnetic resonance imaging in a multi-ethnic cohort of 632 obese youths from 7 to 18 years of age at baseline and after a 2-year follow-up. Insulin secretion rate (ISR), EIC and HIRI were estimated by modeling glucose, insulin, and C-peptide data during 9-point oral glucose tolerance tests. RESULTS. African American youths exhibited the lowest HFF% and a prevalence of NAFLD less than half of Caucasians and one-third of Hispanics. Furthermore, African Americans had lower EIC and glucose-stimulated ISR, despite similar HIRI and plasma insulin levels, compared with Caucasians and Hispanics. EIC and HIRI were markedly reduced in individuals with NAFLD and declined across group-specific HFF% tertiles in all ethnic groups. Consistently, the HFF% correlated with EIC and HIRI, irrespective of the ethnic background, after adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, adiposity, waist-hip ratio, pubertal status, and plasma glucose levels. An increased HFF% at follow-up was associated with decreased EIC and increased HIRI across all groups. CONCLUSIONS. Intrahepatic lipid accumulation is associated with reduced insulin clearance and hepatic insulin sensitivity in obese youths, irrespective of their ethnic background.

The aims of this study were to 1. define the responses of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), glucagon, and peptide YY (PYY) to an oral meal and to intravenous L-arginine; and 2. examine correlation of enteroendocrine hormones with insulin secretion. We hypothesized a relationship between circulating incretin concentrations and insulin secretion.Subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT, n = 23), prediabetes (PDM, n = 17), or with type 2 diabetes (T2DM, n = 22) were studied twice, following a mixed test meal (470 kCal) (mixed meal tolerance test [MMTT]) or intravenous L-arginine (arginine maximal stimulation test [AST], 5 g). GLP-1 (total and active), PYY, GIP, glucagon, and β cell function were measured before and following each stimulus.Baseline enteroendocrine hormones differed across the glucose tolerance (GT) spectrum, T2DM generallyNGT and PDM. In response to MMTT, total and active GLP-1, GIP, glucagon, and PYY increased in all populations. The incremental area-under-the-curve (0-120 min) of analytes like total GLP-1 were often higher in T2DM compared with NGT and PDM (35-51%; P 0.05). At baseline glucose, L-arginine increased total and active GLP-1 and glucagon concentrations in all GT populations (all P 0.05). As expected, the MMTT and AST provoked differential glucose, insulin, and C-peptide responses across GT populations. Baseline or stimulated enteroendocrine hormone concentrations did not consistently correlate with either measure of β cell function.Both MMTT and AST resulted in insulin and enteroendocrine hormone responses across GT populations without consistent correlation between release of incretins and insulin, which is in line with other published research. If a defect is in the enteroendocrine/β cell axis, it is probably reduced response to rather than diminished secretion of enteroendocrine hormones.

AIMS: Adult African American (AA) women have one third of the hepatic insulin clearance of European American (EA) women. This lower hepatic (but not extra-hepatic) insulin clearance in AA individuals is associated with higher plasma insulin concentrations. This study aims to understand whether impairment of hepatic insulin clearance is seen in AA individuals since childhood, possibly suggesting that genetic/epigenetic factors, rather than lifestyle only, contribute to this. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 203 children (105 male and 98 female (55 AA, 88 EA and 60 Hispanic American [HA]; ages, 7–13 years; mean BMI, 19 kg/m(2))) underwent the frequently-sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT) at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, General Clinical Research Center and Department of Nutrition Sciences. Glucose, insulin and C-peptide levels were measured and hepatic and extra-hepatic insulin clearances were calculated using mathematical modelling. RESULTS: Fractional hepatic insulin extraction (FE(L)) was lower in AA than in EA children (mean (SD), 19% (20%) vs 33% (20%); P = 0.0007). Adjusting for age, Tanner stage and body fat, FE(L) was lower in AA than in EA children (P = 0.0012), and there was a slight sex-related difference (FE(L), 24% (10%) vs 29% (10%) in boys vs girls; P = 0.04). Extra-hepatic insulin clearance did not differ with ethnicity (27 (12), 21 (12) and 24 (28) mL/kg/min for AA, HA and EA children, respectively; P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: At a young age, FE(L) is lower in AAs than in EAs, which does not rule out genetic/epigenetic factors. These differences are related to hyperinsulinaemia and, over time, could possibly contribute to metabolic disorders in AA individuals.

Diabetes is often thought of as one of two diseases: Type 1 diabetes (T1D), which is caused by immunological destruction of the beta-cells, and Type 2 diabetes (T2D), which is due to a combination of insulin resistance and relative failure of the beta-cells to compensate for the resistance. It is becoming clear, however, that even within these two definitions there may be considerable heterogeneity (1). There are several approaches to examine heterogeneity of T2D. Among these approaches are the use of biomarkers to categorize the disease, or the examination of variants in the genome. A third approach – the one we have been using in our laboratory – is to identify specific phenotypes which may contribute to failure to regulate the glucose level. We have identified a small group of such phenotypes which can be distinguished and measured using clinical protocols and/or mathematical modeling.

Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been associated with increased serum ketone body levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In the present analysis we evaluated serum ketone body levels and variability in 1278 Japanese patients with T2DM treated with canagliflozin 100 or 200 mg. Similar mean increases in ketone body concentrations of ~2-fold were seen with both canagliflozin doses. The median (interquartile range) percent change from baseline was 62% (0;180) for acetoacetate and 78% (2;236) for β-hydroxybutyrate. Approximately two-thirds of the variability in each ketone measure was attributed to intra-subject variability. Intra-subject variability was higher for serum ketones than other metabolites. Patients in the lowest response tertile exhibited no increase in ketones. Those in the highest response tertile tended to be male and have higher fasting plasma glucose levels, lower insulin levels, and longer T2DM duration at baseline. Moreover, changes in serum ketones were not fully explained by changes in plasma fatty acids, suggesting downstream effects of SGLT2 inhibition on hepatic metabolism that favour ketogenesis. In summary, increases in serum ketone bodies with canagliflozin were greater and more variable than changes in other metabolic measures in Japanese patients with T2DM.

Objective Canagliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D), increases urinary glucose excretion (UGE) and lowers plasma glucose (PG) levels by reducing the renal threshold for glucose (RTG ). This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of canagliflozin in pediatric T2D patients. Methods Patients, aged 10 to 17 years with mean weight 107.2 kg and body mass index 38.2 kg/m2 , underwent PK and PD assessments after receiving a single daily dose of canagliflozin 100 mg (n = 8) or 300 mg (n = 9) for 14 days. Data are presented as mean (SD). Results There were dose-dependent increases in the PK of canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg, with maximum plasma concentrations and areas under plasma concentration curves that were similar to the corresponding values in adults. Mean 24-hour RTG fell to 84.6 (13.8) mg/dL with canagliflozin 100 mg and to 69.1 (9.6) mg/dL with canagliflozin 300 mg; also consistent with reductions in RTG in adults. Mean 24-hour UGE increased from 5.3 (10.5) g at baseline to 74.1 (37.4) g with canagliflozin 100 mg and from 0.1 (0.04) g to 68.6 (26.5) g with canagliflozin 300 mg. Both doses were well tolerated and the tablets had acceptable taste, smell, and swallowability. Conclusions In pediatric T2D patients, canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg had PK and PD characteristics similar to those in adults with T2D, which is likely due to the relative maturity and increased body weight of youth affected with this disorder.

African Americans (AAs) tend to have higher plasma insulin concentrations than European Americans (EAs); the increased insulin concentrations have been attributed to increased secretion and/or decreased insulin clearance by liver or other tissues. This work characterizes the contributions of hepatic versus extrahepatic insulin degradation related to ethnic differences between AAs and EAs. By using a recently developed mathematical model that uses insulin and C-peptide measurements from the insulin-modified, frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT), we estimated hepatic versus extrahepatic insulin clearance in 29 EA and 18 AA healthy women. During the first 20 min of the FSIGT, plasma insulin was approximately twice as high in AAs as in EAs. In contrast, insulin was similar in AAs and EAs after the 20–25 min intravenous insulin infusion. Hepatic insulin first-pass extraction was two-thirds lower in AAs versus EAs in the overnight-fasted state. In contrast, extrahepatic insulin clearance was not lower in AAs than in EAs. The difference in insulin degradation between AAs and EAs can be attributed totally to liver clearance. The mechanism underlying reduced insulin degradation in AAs remains to be clarified, as does the relative importance of reduced liver clearance to increased risk for type 2 diabetes.

Aim Canagliflozin is an SGLT2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of type-2 diabetes. A dynamic population pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model relating 24-h canagliflozin exposure profiles to effects on glycosylated haemoglobin was developed to compare the efficacy of once-daily and twice-daily dosing. Methods Data from two clinical studies, one with once-daily, and the other with twice-daily dosing of canagliflozin as add-on to metformin were used (n = 1347). An established population PK model was used to predict full 24-h profiles from measured trough concentrations and/or baseline covariates. The dynamic PK/PD model incorporated an Emax relationship between 24-h canagliflozin exposure and HbA1c-lowering with baseline HbA1c affecting the efficacy. Results Internal and external model validation demonstrated that the model adequately predicted HbA1c-lowering for canagliflozin once-daily and twice-daily dosing regimens. The differences in HbA1c reduction between the twice-daily and daily mean profiles were minimal (at most 0.023% for 100 mg total daily dose [TDD] and 0.011% for 300 mg TDD, up to week 26, increasing with time and decreasing with TDD) and not considered clinically meaningful. Conclusions Simulations using this model demonstrated the absence of clinically meaningful between-regimen differences in efficacy, supported the regulatory approval of a canagliflozin-metformin immediate release fixed-dose combination tablet and alleviated the need for an additional clinical study.

Objective To quantify the feedback control of energy intake in response to long-term covert manipulation of energy balance in free-living humans. Methods A validated mathematical method was used to calculate energy intake changes during a 52-week placebo-controlled trial in 153 patients treated with canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter inhibitor that increases urinary glucose excretion, thereby resulting in weight loss without patients being directly aware of the energy deficit. The relationship between the body weight time course and the calculated energy intake changes was analyzed using principles from engineering control theory. Results It was discovered that weight loss leads to a proportional increase in appetite resulting in eating above baseline by ∼100 kcal/day per kilogram of lost weight—an amount more than threefold larger than the corresponding energy expenditure adaptations. Conclusions While energy expenditure adaptations have often been considered the main reason for slowing of weight loss and subsequent regain, feedback control of energy intake plays an even larger role and helps explain why long-term maintenance of a reduced body weight is so difficult.

We examined the relationship between insulin clearance, insulin sensitivity, and β-cell function and the longitudinal effect of insulin clearance on β-cell function in lean and obese insulin-sensitive and insulin-resistant adolescents. A hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic and a hyperglycemic clamp were performed in 110 youths to quantify hepatic and peripheral clearance, insulin sensitivity, and β-cell function (disposition index, DIh-clamp). Participants underwent an oral glucose tolerance test at baseline and after 2 years to assess glucose tolerance and oral β-cell function (oDIcpep) and were sorted into four groups (lean and obese normal glucose tolerance, insulin sensitive, insulin resistant, and impaired glucose tolerance). Insulin sensitivity was defined based on the median of insulin stimulated glucose disposal (M) measured during the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. Lean and obese insulin-sensitive participants did not differ with respect to hepatic and peripheral clearance or for insulin sensitivity. Insulin sensitivity was linearly correlated with whole-body insulin clearance. Hepatic insulin extraction at baseline acted as an independent determinant of β-cell function at follow-up. The decline in insulin sensitivity, even in the absence of an impairment of glucose tolerance, is associated with lowering of hepatic insulin clearance in obese youth, which in turn may contribute to the decline in β-cell function over time.

OBJECTIVE Standardized, reproducible, and feasible quantification of β-cell function (BCF) is necessary for the evaluation of interventions to improve insulin secretion and important for comparison across studies. We therefore characterized the responses to, and reproducibility of, standardized methods of in vivo BCF across different glucose tolerance states. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Participants classified as having normal glucose tolerance (NGT; n = 23), prediabetes (PDM; n = 17), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; n = 22) underwent two standardized mixed-meal tolerance tests (MMTT) and two standardized arginine stimulation tests (AST) in a test-retest paradigm and one frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT). RESULTS From the MMTT, insulin secretion in T2DM was >86% lower compared with NGT or PDM (P < 0.001). Insulin sensitivity (Si) decreased from NGT to PDM (∼50%) to T2DM (93% lower [P < 0.001]). In the AST, insulin secretory response to arginine at basal glucose and during hyperglycemia was lower in T2DM compared with NGT and PDM (>58%; all P < 0.001). FSIGT showed decreases in both insulin secretion and Si across populations (P < 0.001), although Si did not differ significantly between PDM and T2DM populations. Reproducibility was generally good for the MMTT, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranging from ∼0.3 to ∼0.8 depending on population and variable. Reproducibility for the AST was very good, with ICC values >0.8 across all variables and populations. CONCLUSIONS Standardized MMTT and AST provide reproducible and complementary measures of BCF with characteristics favorable for longitudinal interventional trials use.

Insulin clearance is a highly variable and important factor that affects circulating insulin concentrations. We developed a novel model-based method to estimate both hepatic and extrahepatic insulin clearance using plasma insulin and C-peptide profiles obtained from the insulin-modified frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. Data from 100 African immigrants without diabetes (mean age 38 years, body weight 81.7 kg, fasting plasma glucose concentration 83 mg/dL, and fasting insulin concentration 37 pmol/L) were used. Endogenous insulin secretion (calculated by C-peptide deconvolution) and insulin infusion rates were used as inputs to a new two-compartment model of insulin kinetics and hepatic and extrahepatic clearance parameters were estimated. Good agreement between modeled and measured plasma insulin profiles was observed (mean normalized root mean square error 6.8%), and considerable intersubject variability in parameters of insulin clearance among individuals was identified (the mean [interquartile range] for hepatic extraction was 25.8% [32.7%], and for extrahepatic insulin clearance was 20.7 mL/kg/min [11.7 mL/kg/min]). Parameters of insulin clearance were correlated with measures of insulin sensitivity and acute insulin response to glucose. The method described appears promising for future research aimed at characterizing variability in insulin clearance and the mechanisms involved in the regulation of insulin clearance.

To report changes in liver function tests observed with canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, across phase 3 studies in patients with type 2 diabetes, and to examine the relationship between changes in liver function tests and the weight loss and glycaemic improvements observed with canagliflozin.Data were pooled from four 26-week, placebo-controlled studies of canagliflozin 100 and 300mg (n=2313) and two 52-week, active-controlled studies of canagliflozin 300mg versus sitagliptin 100mg (n=1488). Analysis of covariance was performed to determine the contribution of changes in body weight and HbA1c to the changes in liver function tests.Reductions in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase and gamma-glutamyl transferase, and increases in bilirubin were seen with canagliflozin 100 and 300mg versus placebo (nominal P0.001 for alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transferase [both doses]; P0.001 for alkaline phosphatase and P=0.015 for bilirubin [canagliflozin 300mg only]) at week 26 and with canagliflozin 300mg versus sitagliptin 100mg (nominal P0.001 for alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase and bilirubin, and P0.01 for alkaline phosphatase) at week 52. Few patients met predefined limits of change criteria for liver function tests, and none met Hy's law criteria. In both populations, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transferase reductions were fully explained by HbA1c and body weight reductions.Canagliflozin provided improvements in liver function tests versus either placebo or sitagliptin treatments that were fully explained by the combined effects of HbA1c and body weight reductions with canagliflozin.

Type 2 diabetes is a chronic disease with disabling micro- and macrovascular complications that lead to excessive morbidity and premature mortality. It affects hundreds of millions of people and imposes an undue economic burden on populations across the world. Although insulin resistance and insulin secretory defects play a major role in the pathogenesis of hyperglycemia, several other metabolic defects contribute to the initiation/worsening of the diabetic state. Prominent among these is increased renal glucose reabsorption, which is maladaptive in patients with diabetes. Instead of an increase in renal glucose excretion, which could ameliorate hyperglycemia, there is an increase in renal glucose reabsorption, which helps sustain hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes. The sodium–glucose cotransporter (SGLT) 2 inhibitors are novel antidiabetes agents that inhibit renal glucose reabsorption and promote glucosuria, thereby leading to reductions in plasma glucose concentrations. In this article, we review the long journey from the discovery of the glucosuric agent phlorizin in the bark of the apple tree through the animal and human studies that led to the development of the current generation of SGLT2 inhibitors.

African American (AA) adult women (AAw) have 1/3 the hepatic insulin extraction as European American adult women (EAw). Lower hepatic (but not extrahepatic) insulin clearance in AAw contributes to hyperinsulinemia. Our aim was to examine whether hepatic insulin clearance impairment exists in AA since childhood. If so, genetic factors might explain ethnic differences in insulin clearance. The FSIGT was performed on 203 children [55 AAc, 88 EAc, 60 HAc (Hispanic American), ages 7-13 years, mean BMI = 19 kg/m2, basal plasma glucose = 99 mg/dL, insulin = 78 pM, C-peptide = 511 pM]. Data were analyzed with a recent mathematical model providing individual estimates of both hepatic fractional insulin extraction (FEL) and extrahepatic insulin clearance (CLP). Results are presented as mean (SD). Two-way ANOVA and ANCOVA were done: sex and ethnicity were used as groups for both the analysis, while age, Tanner stage and body fat from DXA were the covariates. FEL is lower in AAc (19% (20%)) than EAc (33% (20%)), p = 0.0007). Adjusting for the covariates, ethnicity was still associated with lower FEL in AAc vs. EAc (p = 0.0012); sex had a slight but significant effect (FEL=24% (10%) in boys vs. 29% (10%) in girls, p = 0.04). FEL in HAc (28% (21%)) was not significantly different than either AAc or EAc (p>0.05), with or without covariates correction. No correlation between FEL and age was found in these children. Unlike FEL, CLP was not impacted by ethnicity or sex; similar values were observed among the three groups [27 (12), 21 (12), and 24 (28) mL/kg/min for AAc, HAc, and EAc, respectively; p > 0.05]. As the between-group differences in FEL are seen early in childhood, this suggests genetic factors likely contribute to those, rather than lifestyle, that might have a less evident effect at that age, instead. Playing a more important role than previously realized, the reduced insulin degradation would lead to hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, and possibly greater risk for type 2 diabetes in AA, compared to other ethnic groups. Disclosure F. Piccinini: None. D. Polidori: Employee; Self; Janssen Research & Development. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Janssen Research & Development. B. Gower: None. J.R. Fernandez: None. R.N. Bergman: Advisory Panel; Self; Ingredion, Inc.. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca. Consultant; Self; GI Dynamics Inc.. Research Support; Self; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Consultant; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S.

OBJECTIVE This study assessed the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin, a sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, as add-on to insulin in adults with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This 18-week, double-blind, phase 2 study randomized 351 patients (HbA1c 7.0–9.0% [53–75 mmol/mol]) on multiple daily insulin injections or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion to canagliflozin 100 or 300 mg or placebo. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving at week 18 both HbA1c reduction from baseline of ≥0.4% (≥4.4 mmol/mol) and no increase in body weight. Other end points included changes in HbA1c, body weight, and insulin dose, as well as hypoglycemia incidence. Safety was assessed by adverse event (AE) reports. RESULTS More patients had both HbA1c reduction ≥0.4% and no increase in body weight with canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg versus placebo at week 18 (36.9%, 41.4%, 14.5%, respectively; P < 0.001). Both canagliflozin doses provided reductions in HbA1c, body weight, and insulin dose versus placebo over 18 weeks. The incidence of hypoglycemia was similar across groups; severe hypoglycemia rates were low (1.7–6.8%). Overall incidence of AEs was 55.6%, 67.5%, and 54.7% with canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg and placebo; discontinuation rates were low (0.9–1.3%). Increased incidence of ketone-related AEs (5.1%, 9.4%, 0%), including the specific AE of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) (4.3%, 6.0%, 0%), was seen with canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg versus placebo. CONCLUSIONS Canagliflozin provided reductions in HbA1c, body weight, and insulin dose with no increase in hypoglycemia, but increased rates of ketone-related AEs, including DKA, in adults with type 1 diabetes inadequately controlled with insulin.

Aims Assess the steady-state pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of once-daily (q.d.) versus twice-daily (b.i.d.) dosing with canagliflozin at the same total daily doses of 100 and 300 mg in healthy participants. Methods 34 participants (17 in each cohort) were enrolled in this single-center, open-label, multiple-dose, 2-cohort, 2-way crossover study. Participants in each cohort received a total daily dose of either 100 or 300 mg canagliflozin for 5 days with q.d. then b.i.d. dosing or vice versa. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were assessed on day 5 of each period. Results The canagliflozin Cmax,ss of 100 and 300 mg q.d. dosing were higher by 66% and 72% than corresponding morning Cmax,ss of the 50 mg and 150 mg b.i.d. regimen, respectively. The geometric mean ratios (90% CI) of b.i.d./q.d. for AUC0-24h,ss at total doses of 100 and 300 mg were 97.08 (94.08; 99.62) and 99.32 (94.71; 104.16) respectively. Median tmax and mean t1/2 were independent of dose and regimen. Mean (SE) 24-h mean renal glucose threshold values for b.i.d. and q.d. regimens were 59.2 (1.03) and 60.2 (1.03) mg/dL for the 100 mg daily doses and 51.0 (1.04) and 52.5 (1.04) mg/dL for the 300 mg daily doses. Mean (SE) values of 24-h urinary glucose excretion for b.i.d. and q.d. regimens were 52.8 (1.94) and 48.6 (1.94) g for the 100 mg daily doses and 58.6 (3.81) and 57.8 (3.81) g for the 300 mg daily doses. Both doses were safe and well tolerated. Conclusion Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of canagliflozin administered q.d. relative to b.i.d. at the same 100 and 300 mg total daily doses were comparable. Overall, canagliflozin was well tolerated.

SUMMARY Canagliflozin is an SGLT2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of adults with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A comprehensive Phase III program evaluated canagliflozin in a broad range of patients with T2DM on various background therapies; studies were also conducted in special populations, including older patients and those with moderate renal impairment. Canagliflozin provided clinically meaningful reductions in HbA1c, bodyweight and blood pressure versus placebo and active comparators in studies up to 104 weeks. Canagliflozin was generally well tolerated, with increased incidences of adverse events related to the mechanism of action, including genital mycotic infections and osmotic diuresis-related adverse events. Overall, canagliflozin appears to be a useful treatment option for patients with inadequately controlled T2DM.

Canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, reduces HbA1c, body weight and systolic BP (SBP) in patients with type 2 diabetes. As weight loss is known to reduce both HbA1c and SBP, these analyses were performed to evaluate the contribution of weight loss resulting from treatment with canagliflozin to HbA1c and SBP reductions in patients with type 2 diabetes.Pooled data from four placebo-controlled Phase 3 studies (N = 2,250) in patients with type 2 diabetes were used in the analyses. In each study, patients were treated with placebo, canagliflozin 100 mg or canagliflozin 300 mg, once daily for 26 weeks. Changes from baseline in body weight, HbA1c and SBP were measured at week 26, and the contribution of weight loss to the lowering of HbA1c and SBP was obtained using ANCOVA.Canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg reduced mean body weight, HbA1c and SBP compared with placebo (p 0.001 for each), and more patients had body-weight reductions0%, ≥5% and ≥10% with canagliflozin treatment than with placebo. Weight-loss-independent and weight-loss-associated mechanisms contributed to HbA1c and SBP lowering with canagliflozin: ~85% of HbA1c lowering and ~60% of SBP lowering was independent of weight loss.In patients with type 2 diabetes, canagliflozin provided clinically meaningful body-weight reductions, and the weight loss contributed to reductions in HbA1c and SBP.

Objective Canagliflozin is a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor approved for treating patients with type 2 diabetes. This study evaluated renal and non-renal effects of canagliflozin on postprandial plasma glucose (PG) excursion in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin. Materials/Methods Patients (N=37) were randomized to a four-period crossover study with 3-day inpatient stays in each period and 2-week wash-outs between periods. Patients received Treatments (A) placebo/placebo, (B) canagliflozin 300mg/placebo, (C) canagliflozin 300mg/canagliflozin 300mg, or (D) canagliflozin 300mg/canagliflozin 150mg on Day 2/Day 3 in one of four treatment sequences (similar urinary glucose excretion [UGE] expected for Treatments B–D). A mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) was given 20minutes post-dose on Day 3 of each period. Results A single dose of canagliflozin 300mg reduced both fasting and postprandial PG compared with placebo, with generally similar effects on fasting PG and UGE observed for Treatments B–D. An additional dose of canagliflozin 300mg (Treatment C), but not 150mg (Treatment D), prior to the MMTT on Day 3 provided greater postprandial PG reduction versus placebo (difference in incremental glucose AUC 0–2h , −7.5% for B vs A; −18.5% for C vs A; −12.0% [ P =0.012] for C vs B), leading to modestly greater reductions in total glucose AUC 0–2h with Treatment C versus Treatment B or D. Canagliflozin was generally well tolerated. Conclusions These findings suggest that a non-renal mechanism (ie, beyond UGE) contributes to glucose lowering for canagliflozin 300mg, but not 150mg.

Changes in gastrointestinal peptide release may play an important role in improving glucose control and reducing body weight following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), but the impact of low caloric intake on gut peptide release post-surgery has not been well characterized. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationships between low caloric intake and gut peptide release and how they were altered by RYGB. Obese females including ten normoglycemic (ON) and ten with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (OD) were studied before, 1 week, and 3 months after RYGB. Nine lean, normoglycemic women were studied for comparison. Subjects were given three separate mixed meal challenges (MMCs; 75, 150, and 300 kcal). Plasma glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and peptide YY (PYY) were analyzed. Prior to surgery, only minimal increases in GLP-1 and PYY were observed in response to the MMCs. After surgery, the peak GLP-1 concentration was progressively elevated in response to increasing meal sizes. The meal sizes had a statistically significant impact on elevation of GLP-1 incremental areas under the curve (ΔAUC) in both ON and OD at 1 week and 3 months post-surgery visits (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). The PYY ∆AUC was also significantly increased in a meal size-dependent manner in both ON and OD at both post-surgery visits (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Meal sizes as small as 75-300 kcal, which cause minimal stimulation in GLP-1 or PYY release in the subjects before RYGB, are sufficient to provide statistically significant, meal size-dependent increases in the peptides post-RYGB both acutely and after meaningful weight loss occurred.

Background Many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) also have hypertension, which is commonly treated with thiazide diuretics, including hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). Canagliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor developed for the treatment of T2DM, lowers plasma glucose by inhibiting renal glucose reabsorption, thereby increasing urinary glucose excretion and mild osmotic diuresis. Because patients with T2DM are likely to receive concurrent canagliflozin and HCTZ, potential interactions were evaluated. Objective This study evaluated the effects of HCTZ on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and tolerability of canagliflozin in healthy participants. Methods This Phase I, single-center, open-label, fixed-sequence, 2-period study was conducted in healthy participants. During period 1, participants received canagliflozin 300 mg once daily for 7 days, followed by a 14-day washout period. During period 2, participants received HCTZ 25 mg once daily for 28 days, followed by canagliflozin 300 mg + HCTZ 25 mg once daily for 7 days. Blood samples were taken before and several times after administration on day 7 of period 1 and on days 28 and 35 of period 2 for canagliflozin and HCTZ pharmacokinetic analyses using LC-MS/MS. Blood and urine samples were collected for up to 24 hours after canagliflozin administration on day 1 of period 1 and day 35 of period 2 for pharmacodynamic glucose assessment. Tolerability was also evaluated. Results Thirty participants were enrolled (16 men, 14 women; all white; mean age, 43.7 years). Canagliflozin AUC during a dosing interval (T) at steady state (AUC τ,ss ) and C max at steady state (C max,ss ) were increased when canagliflozin was coadministered with HCTZ, with geometric mean ratios (90% CI) of 1.12 (1.08–1.17) and 1.15 (1.06–1.25), respectively. AUC τ,ss and C max,ss for HCTZ were similar with and without canagliflozin coadministration. The 24-hour mean renal threshold for glucose and mean plasma glucose were comparable for canagliflozin alone and coadministered with HCTZ. The change in 24-hour urine volume from baseline was −0.1 L with canagliflozin alone and 0.4 L with HCTZ alone and with canagliflozin + HCTZ. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was higher with canagliflozin + HCTZ (69%) than with canagliflozin (47%) or HCTZ (50%) alone; most AEs were of mild severity. Overall, minimal changes in serum electrolytes (eg, sodium, potassium) were observed after coadministration of canagliflozin + HCTZ compared with individual treatments. Conclusions Adding canagliflozin treatment to healthy participants on HCTZ treatment had no notable pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic effects; canagliflozin coadministered with HCTZ was generally well tolerated, with no unexpected tolerability concerns. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01294631.

Background The renal threshold for glucose (RTG) is determined by the nephron's reabsorptive capacity. Glucose is reabsorbed through sodium-coupled glucose cotransporters in the proximal tubules. During pregnancy, renal glucose reabsorptive capacity decreases, possibly, due to reduced glucose transporter expression. Our hypothesis is that inadequate decrease in RTG during pregnancy will make women more prone to develop gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods Pregnant women (n = 40) who were referred to our center for oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were included in the analysis. Plasma glucose levels and urinary glucose excretion were measured for 4 h after 100 g oral glucose load. These data were used to calculate RTG. The subjects were divided into two cohorts, GDM and non-GDM, according to the OGTT results. Mean RTG was compared between the two groups. Results Fifteen (37.5%) of the women were diagnosed with GDM. Seventeen participants had only trace amounts of urinary glucose excretion, and no value of RTG could be determined; RTG was determined in the other 23 subjects. Among these 23 women, 13 were diagnosed as GDM, and 10 had normal OGTT. RTG was lower in the non-GDM women (146 ± 14 mg/dL) than in the GDM women (182 ± 18 mg/dL), p

OBJECTIVE Canagliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter (SGLT) 2 inhibitor, is also a low-potency SGLT1 inhibitor. This study tested the hypothesis that intestinal canagliflozin levels postdose are sufficiently high to transiently inhibit intestinal SGLT1, thereby delaying intestinal glucose absorption. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This two-period, crossover study evaluated effects of canagliflozin on intestinal glucose absorption in 20 healthy subjects using a dual-tracer method. Placebo or canagliflozin 300 mg was given 20 min before a 600-kcal mixed-meal tolerance test. Plasma glucose, 3H-glucose, 14C-glucose, and insulin were measured frequently for 6 h to calculate rates of appearance of oral glucose (RaO) in plasma, endogenous glucose production, and glucose disposal. RESULTS Compared with placebo, canagliflozin treatment reduced postprandial plasma glucose and insulin excursions (incremental 0- to 2-h area under the curve [AUC0–2h] reductions of 35% and 43%, respectively; P < 0.001 for both), increased 0- to 6-h urinary glucose excretion (UGE0–6h, 18.2 ± 5.6 vs. CONCLUSIONS Canagliflozin reduces postprandial plasma glucose and insulin by increasing UGE (via renal SGLT2 inhibition) and delaying RaO, likely due to intestinal SGLT1 inhibition.

Context: The stepwise hyperglycemic clamp procedure (SHCP) is the gold standard for measuring the renal threshold for glucose excretion (RTG), but its use is limited to small studies in specialized laboratories. Objective: The objective of the study was to validate a new method for determining RTG using data obtained during a mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) in untreated and canagliflozin-treated subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Design: This was an open-label study with 2 sequential parts. Setting: The study was performed at a single center in Germany. Patients: Twenty-eight subjects with T2DM were studied. Interventions: No treatment intervention was given in part 1. In part 2, subjects were treated with canagliflozin 100 mg/d for 8 days. In each part, subjects underwent an MMTT and a 5-step SHCP on consecutive days. Main Outcome Measures: For both methods, RTG was estimated using measured blood glucose (BG) and urinary glucose excretion (UGE); estimated glomerular filtration rates were also used to determine RTG during the MMTT. The methods were compared using the concordance correlation coefficient and geometric mean ratios. Results: In untreated and canagliflozin-treated subjects, the relationship between UGE rate and BG was well described by a threshold relationship. Good agreement was obtained between the MMTT-based and SHCP-derived RTG values. The concordance correlation coefficient (for all subjects) was 0.94; geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for RTG values (MMTT/SHCP) were 0.93 (0.89–0.96) in untreated subjects and 1.03 (0.78–1.37) in canagliflozin-treated subjects. Study procedures and treatments were generally well tolerated in untreated and canagliflozin-treated subjects. Conclusions: In both untreated and canagliflozin-treated subjects with T2DM, RTG can be accurately estimated from measured BG, UGE, and estimated glomerular filtration rates using an MMTT-based method.

ObjectiveTo quantify the homeostatic feedback control of energy intake in response to long-term covert manipulation of energy balance in free-living humans.MethodsWe used a validated mathematical method to calculate energy intake changes during a 52 week placebo-controlled trial in 153 patients treated with canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter inhibitor that increases urinary glucose excretion thereby resulting in weight loss without patients being directly aware of the energy deficit. We analyzed the relationship between the body weight time course and the calculated energy intake changes using principles from engineering control theory.ResultsWe discovered that weight loss leads to a proportional homeostatic drive to increase energy intake above baseline by ~100 kcal/day per kg of lost weight – an amount more than 3-fold larger than the corresponding energy expenditure adaptations.ConclusionsWhile energy expenditure adaptations are often thought to be the main reason for slowing of weight loss and subsequent regain, feedback control of energy intake plays an even larger role and helps explain why long-term maintenance of a reduced body weight is so difficult.FundingThis research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Diabetes & Digestive & Kidney Diseases, using data from a study sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC.DisclosureD.P. is a full-time employee of Janssen Research & Development, LLC. K.D.H. reports patent pending on a method of personalized dynamic feedback control of body weight (US Patent Application No. 13/754,058; assigned to the NIH) and has received funding from the Nutrition Science Initiative to investigate the effects of ketogenic diets on human energy expenditure. R.S. is a paid consultant for Janssen, Novo Nordisk, Takeda, Daichii Sankyo, Novartis, Pfizer, Nestle, Circuit Therapeutics and Ethicon. R.S., also has received research support from Novo Nordisk, Ethicon, Sanofiand Boehringer Ingelheim. A.S. reports no conflicts of interest.What is already known about this subject?Human body weight is believed to be regulated by homeostatic feedback control of both energy intake and energy expenditure.Adaptations of energy expenditure to weight loss have been well-established, but the homeostatic control of energy intake has yet to be quantified.What this study addsWe provide the first quantification of the homeostatic control of energy intake in free-living humans.The increase in energy intake per kg of weight lost is several-fold larger than the known energy expenditure adaptations.Homeostatic control of energy intake is likely the primary reason why it is difficult to achieve and sustain large weight losses.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of canagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, in type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, dose-ranging study in 451 subjects randomized to canagliflozin 50, 100, 200, or 300 mg once daily (QD) or 300 mg twice daily (BID), sitagliptin 100 mg QD, or placebo. Primary end point was change in A1C from baseline through week 12. Secondary end points included change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body weight, and overnight urinary glucose-to-creatinine ratio. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS Canagliflozin was associated with significant reductions in A1C from baseline (7.6–8.0%) to week 12: −0.79, −0.76, −0.70, −0.92, and −0.95% for canagliflozin 50, 100, 200, 300 mg QD and 300 mg BID, respectively, versus −0.22% for placebo (all P < 0.001) and −0.74% for sitagliptin. FPG was reduced by −16 to −27 mg/dL, and body weight was reduced by −2.3 to −3.4%, with significant increases in urinary glucose-to-creatinine ratio. Adverse events were transient, mild to moderate, and balanced across arms except for a non–dose-dependent increase in symptomatic genital infections with canagliflozin (3–8%) versus placebo and sitagliptin (2%). Urinary tract infections were reported without dose dependency in 3–9% of canagliflozin, 6% of placebo, and 2% of sitagliptin arms. Overall incidence of hypoglycemia was low. CONCLUSIONS Canagliflozin added onto metformin significantly improved glycemic control in type 2 diabetes and was associated with low incidence of hypoglycemia and significant weight loss. The safety/tolerability profile of canagliflozin was favorable except for increased frequency of genital infections in females.

Canagliflozin is a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of adults with Type 2 diabetes. In phase III studies, canagliflozin reduced HbA1c, body weight and blood pressure, and was generally well tolerated [1–6]. Canagliflozin lowers plasma glucose by lowering the renal threshold for glucose and increasing urinary glucose excretion [7,8]. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Canagliflozin is a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor developed to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Our objective is to describe the effects of canagliflozin on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone biomarkers in patients with T2DM.This was a randomized study, consisting of a 26-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled period and a 78-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled extension.This study was undertaken in 90 centers in 17 countries.Patients were aged 55-80 years (N = 716) and whose T2DM was inadequately controlled on a stable antihyperglycemic regimen.Canagliflozin 100 or 300 mg or placebo were administered once daily.BMD was assessed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at weeks 26, 52, and 104. Bone strength was assessed using quantitative computed tomography and finite element analysis at week 52. Serum collagen type 1 β-carboxy-telopeptide, osteocalcin, and estradiol were assessed at weeks 26 and 52.Canagliflozin doses of 100 and 300 mg were associated with a decrease in total hip BMD over 104 weeks, (placebo-subtracted changes: -0.9% and -1.2%, respectively), but not at other sites measured (femoral neck, lumbar spine, or distal forearm). No meaningful changes in bone strength were observed. At week 52, canagliflozin was associated with an increase in collagen type 1 β-carboxy-telopeptide that was significantly correlated with a reduction in body weight, an increase in osteocalcin, and, in women, a decrease in estradiol.In older patients with T2DM, canagliflozin showed small but significant reductions in total hip BMD and increases in bone formation and resorption biomarkers, due at least in part to weight loss.

The incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus is increasing worldwide. Several G–protein–coupled receptor agonists are being studied for their efficacy as antidiabetes agents. JNJ–38431055 is a novel, potent, and orally available selective agonist of the glucose–dependent insulinotropic (GPR119) receptor. Double–blind, randomized, placebo–controlled studies were conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single oral doses of JNJ–38431055 (2.5–800 mg) in healthy male volunteers. The systemic exposure of JNJ–38431055 in plasma increased in proportion to the dose and was not influenced by coadministration of food. The terminal elimination half–life was ~13 h when administered as an oral suspension formulation. JNJ–38431055 was well tolerated and was not associated with hypoglycemia. As compared with placebo, single–dose oral JNJ–38431055 increased postmeal plasma glucagon–like peptide 1 (GLP–1), glucose–dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), and peptide YY (PYY) concentrations but did not significantly decrease glucose excursion or increase insulin secretion. However, in a graded glucose infusion study, JNJ–38431055 was shown to induce a higher insulin secretion rate (ISR) relative to placebo at elevated plasma glucose levels. These studies provide evidence for the potential efficacy of JNJ–38431055 as an antidiabetes agent in humans. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2011); 90 5, 685–692. doi:10.1038/clpt.2011.169

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has been shown to induce rapid and durable reversal of type 2 diabetes.The aim of the study was to investigate a possible mechanism for the remission of type 2 diabetes after RYGB.A cross-sectional, nonrandomized, controlled study was conducted. Surgery patients were studied before RYGB and 1 wk and 3 months after surgery.This study was conducted at East Carolina University.Subjects were recruited into three groups: 1) lean controls with no surgery [body mass index (BMI)25 kg/m²; n = 9], 2) severely obese type 2 diabetic patients (BMI35 kg/m²; n = 9), and 3) severely obese nondiabetic patients (BMI35 kg/m²; n = 9).Intervention was RYGB.One week after RYGB, diabetes was resolved despite continued insulin resistance (insulin sensitivity index was approximately 50% of lean controls) and reduced insulin secretion during an iv glucose tolerance test (acute insulin response to glucose was approximately 50% of lean controls). Fasting insulin decreased and was no different from lean control despite continued elevated glucose in the type 2 diabetic patients compared with lean.After RYGB, fasting insulin decreases to levels like those of lean control subjects and diabetes is reversed (fasting blood glucose125 mg/dl). This leads us to propose that 1) exclusion of food from the foregut corrects hyperinsulinemia and 2) fasting insulin is dissociated from the influence of fasting glucose, insulin resistance, and BMI. The mechanisms for reversal of diabetes in the face of reduced insulin remain a paradox.

Canagliflozin, a potent, selective sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor in development for treatment of type 2 diabetes, lowers plasma glucose (PG) by lowering the renal threshold for glucose (RT(G) ) and increasing urinary glucose excretion (UGE). An ascending single oral-dose phase 1 study investigated safety, tolerability and pharmacodynamics of canagliflozin in healthy men (N = 63) randomized to receive canagliflozin (n = 48) or placebo (n = 15). Canagliflozin (10, 30, 100, 200, 400, 600 or 800 mg q.d. or 400 mg b.i.d.) was administered to eight cohorts (six subjects/cohort: canagliflozin; two subjects/cohort: placebo). Dose dependently, canagliflozin decreased calculated 24-h mean RT(G) with maximal reduction to approximately 60 mg/dl, and increased mean 24-h UGE. At doses >200 mg administered before breakfast, canagliflozin reduced postprandial PG and serum insulin excursions at that meal. Canagliflozin was generally well tolerated; most adverse events were mild and no hypoglycaemia was reported. These results support further study of canagliflozin.

Aim To explain the subadditive efficacy typically observed with initial combination treatments for type 2 diabetes. Methods Individual subject data from 1186 patients with type 2 diabetes [mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) = 8.8%] treated with metformin, canagliflozin or canagliflozin + metformin were used. The baseline HbA1c versus ΔHbA1c relationships for monotherapy arms were determined using analysis of covariance and then used to predict efficacy in the combination arms by modelling how applying one treatment lowers the ‘effective baseline HbA1c’ for a second treatment. The model was further tested using data from several published combination studies. Results The mean ΔHbA1c levels were −1.25, −1.33, −1.37, −1.77 and −1.81% with metformin, canagliflozin 100 mg, canagliflozin 300 mg, canagliflozin 100 mg/metformin and canagliflozin 300 mg/metformin, respectively. Using the monotherapy results, the predicted efficacy for the canagliflozin/metformin arms was within 10% of the observed values using the new model, whereas assuming simple additivity overpredicted efficacy in the combination arms by nearly 50%. For 10 other published initial combination studies, predictions from the new model [mean (standard error) predicted ΔHbA1c = 1.67% (0.14)] were much more consistent with observed values [ΔHbA1c = 1.72% (0.12)] than predictions based on assuming additivity [predicted ΔHbA1c = 2.19% (0.21)]. Conclusions The less-than-additive efficacy commonly seen with initial combination treatments for type 2 diabetes can be largely explained by the impact of baseline HbA1c on the efficacy of individual treatments. Novel formulas have been developed for predicting the efficacy of combination treatments based on the efficacy of individual treatments and the baseline HbA1c of the target patients.

Purpose Canagliflozin, an orally active selective inhibitor of sodium glucose cotransporter 2, has been approved in several countries for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study assessed the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties and tolerability of single-dose canagliflozin 200 or 300 mg in healthy Indian participants. Methods In this Phase 1, single-center, open-label, 2-period crossover study, healthy adult participants were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of canagliflozin 200 mg in period 1, followed by canagliflozin 300 mg in period 2, or vice versa. The 2 periods were separated by a washout interval of 14 days. The PK and PD properties and tolerability of canagliflozin were assessed at prespecified time points. Findings Of 15 randomized participants, 14 completed the study. After the administration of single doses of 200 and 300 mg, the mean (SD) C max values were 1792 (430) ng/mL and 2789 (941) ng/mL, respectively; AUC 0–∞ , values were 18,706 (3818) ng·h/mL and 28,207 (5901) ng·h/mL, respectively. The T max and t ½ of canagliflozin were independent of dose (T max , 1.5 hours at both doses; t ½ , 13.0 and 12.6 hours with 200 and 300 mg). Over the first 4 hours, mean (SD) renal threshold for glucose (RT G ) values were 60.8 (8.90) and 61.2 (7.04) mg/dL with the 200- and 300-mg doses, respectively. No effect on plasma glucose concentrations over 0 to 4 hours relative to baseline was observed with either dose. The only treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) reported in >1 participant was dizziness (2 participants with the 200-mg dose). None of the participants in the 300-mg group reported any TEAEs. No deaths, discontinuations due to TEAEs, or hypoglycemic episodes were reported. Implications The mean plasma exposure (C max and AUC) to canagliflozin increased in a dose-dependent manner after the administration of single-dose oral canagliflozin 200 and 300 mg in these healthy Indian participants. The T max and t ½ of canagliflozin appeared to be independent of dose. Overall, PK characteristics were consistent with previous findings in other ethnic populations. The reductions in RT G with canagliflozin were similar to those reported in Western participants, whereas the amount of urinary glucose excretion was somewhat less than those previously observed in studies in Western participants. Canagliflozin was generally well tolerated in these healthy Indian participants. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01748526.

The sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor canagliflozin is a novel treatment option for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In patients with hyperglycemia, SGLT2 inhibition lowers plasma glucose levels by reducing the renal threshold for glucose (RTG ) and increasing urinary glucose excretion (UGE). Increased UGE is also associated with a mild osmotic diuresis and net caloric loss, which can lead to reductions in body weight and blood pressure (BP). After promising results from preclinical and phase I/II studies, the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin was evaluated in a comprehensive phase III development program in over 10,000 patients with T2DM on various background therapies. Canagliflozin improved glycemic control and provided reductions in body weight and BP versus placebo and active comparators in studies of up to 2 years' duration. Canagliflozin was generally well tolerated, with higher incidences of adverse events (AEs) related to the mechanism of action, including genital mycotic infections and AEs related to osmotic diuresis. Results from the preclinical and clinical studies led canagliflozin to be the first-in-class SGLT2 inhibitor approved in the United States, and support canagliflozin as a safe and effective therapeutic option across a broad range of patients with T2DM.

Background/Aims: Familial Renal Glucosuria (FRG) is characterized by the presence of persistent isolated glucosuria in the absence of hyperglycemia. Mutations in SLC5A2, the gene coding for the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2), are responsible for FRG. Phenotype/genotype correlations in FRG have mostly relied on the quantification of Urinary Glucose Excretion (UGE), which is dependent on both the filtered glucose load and the renal glucose reabsorptive capacity. In the current work, the renal threshold for glucose excretion (RTG) was determined in an FRG cohort, with the purpose of characterizing the impact of SGLT2 mutations on renal glucose transport. Methods: From January to December of 2013, eight FRG individuals with identified SLC5A2 mutations were enrolled. Patients were given a Mixed-Meal Tolerance Test during which blood glucose and UGE were measured over a 4 h period and the data was used to calculate RTG, according to a recently validated protocol. Results: In patients with homozygous mutations, RTG values were very low, with a mean (SD) of 0.95 (1.17) mmol/l, compared to commonly reported values of approximately 10-11.1 mmol/l in healthy subjects. In subjects with heterozygous mutations, mean (SD) RTG values were 4.91 (1.23) mmol/l, which are approximately one-half of the values in subjects without mutations. Conclusions: In FRG, mutations in SLC5A2 lead to reductions in RTG and increases in UGE. Because determination of RTG is not influenced by the filtered glucose load, the calculated RTG values provide a more refined measure of the impact of mutations on renal glucose transport than can be obtained from UGE alone.

Aims To compare the pharmacodynamic effects of the highest approved doses of the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors canagliflozin and dapagliflozin on urinary glucose excretion (UGE), renal threshold for glucose excretion (RTG) and postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) excursion in healthy participants in a randomized, double-blind, two-period crossover study. Methods In each treatment period, participants (n = 54) received canagliflozin 300 mg or dapagliflozin 10 mg for 4 days (20 min before breakfast). A mixed-meal tolerance test (600 kcal; 75 g glucose) was performed at baseline and on day 4 of each treatment period to assess changes in incremental PPG (PPGΔAUC0–2 h). We measured 24-h UGE and plasma glucose on day 4 to determine 24-h mean RTG. Results Canagliflozin 300 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg had similar effects on UGE and RTG for 4 h after dosing, but canagliflozin was associated with higher UGE and greater RTG reductions for the remainder of the day. Mean 24-h UGE was ∼25% higher with canagliflozin than with dapagliflozin (51.4 vs. 40.8 g), and 24-h mean RTG was ∼0.4 mmol/l (7 mg/dl) lower with canagliflozin than with dapagliflozin (3.79 vs. 4.17 mmol/l; p

Aim To evaluate the effects of canagliflozin on plasma volume, urinary glucose excretion (UGE), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and additional measures of fluid/electrolyte balance in patients with type 2 diabetes on background therapy with metformin and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. Methods Patients (N = 36) were randomized (1 : 1) to receive canagliflozin 300 mg or placebo for 12 weeks. Pharmacodynamic parameters were assessed at baseline and at weeks 1 and 12. Results Increased 24-h UGE was seen in the canagliflozin group compared with a reduction in the placebo group at both week 1 (91.8 vs. −2.4 g) and week 12 (82.6 vs. −0.4 g). Canagliflozin also reduced both FPG and HbA1c. Reductions in body weight and blood pressure were observed at weeks 1 and 12. Canagliflozin decreased plasma volume compared with an increase with placebo at week 1 (−5.4 vs. 4.3%; p = 0.02), but this was largely attenuated at week 12 (4.6 vs. 5.8%; p = 0.76). A modest numerical increase in urine volume was observed with canagliflozin at week 1 that was attenuated at week 12; other measures of volume status (i.e. blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine and haematocrit) remained modestly increased with canagliflozin at week 12. Conclusion Canagliflozin provided sustained effects on UGE and FPG over 12 weeks and a transient reduction in plasma volume that was largely attenuated by week 12.

Aims/hypothesis In rodent models of diabetes, treatment with sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improves beta cell function. This analysis assessed the effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor, canagliflozin, on model-based measures of beta cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods Data from three Phase 3 studies were analysed, in which: (Study 1) canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg were compared with placebo as monotherapy for 26 weeks; (Study 2) canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg were compared with placebo as add-on to metformin + sulfonylurea for 26 weeks; or (Study 3) canagliflozin 300 mg was compared with sitagliptin 100 mg as add-on to metformin + sulfonylurea for 52 weeks. In each study, a subset of patients was given mixed-meal tolerance tests at baseline and study endpoint, and model-based beta cell function parameters were calculated from plasma glucose and C-peptide. Results In Studies 1 and 2, both canagliflozin doses increased beta cell glucose sensitivity compared with placebo. Placebo-subtracted least squares mean (LSM) (SEM) changes were 23 (9) and 18 (9) pmol min−1 m−2 (mmol/l)−1 with canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg, respectively (p

This study characterized single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of canagliflozin and its O-glucuronide metabolites (M5 and M7) and pharmacodynamics (renal threshold for glucose [RTG ], urinary glucose excretion [UGE0-24h ], and 24-hour mean plasma glucose [MPG0-24h ]) of canagliflozin in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Thirty-six randomized subjects received canagliflozin 50, 100, or 300 mg/day or placebo for 7 days. On Days 1 and 7, area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax ) for canagliflozin and its metabolites increased dose-dependently. Half-life and time at which Cmax was observed were dose-independent. Systemic molar M5 exposure was half that of canagliflozin; M7 exposure was similar to canagliflozin. Steady-state plasma canagliflozin concentrations were reached by Day 4 in all active treatment groups. Pharmacodynamic effects were dose- and exposure-dependent. All canagliflozin doses decreased RTG , increased UGE0-24h , and reduced MPG0-24h versus placebo on Days 1 and 7. On Day 7, placebo-subtracted least-squares mean decreases in MPG0-24h ranged from 42-57 mg/dL with canagliflozin treatment. Adverse events (AEs) were balanced between treatments; no treatment-related serious AEs, AE-related discontinuations, or clinically meaningful adverse changes in routine safety evaluations occurred. The observed pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of canagliflozin in subjects with type 2 diabetes supports a once-daily dosing regimen.

Introduction This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single and multiple ascending-dose study evaluated the pharmacodynamic effects and safety/tolerability of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods Patients (N = 116) discontinued their antihyperglycemic medications 2 weeks before randomization. Patients received canagliflozin 30, 100, 200, or 400 mg once daily or 300 mg twice daily, or placebo at 2 study centers in the United States and Germany, or canagliflozin 30 mg once daily or placebo at 1 study center in Korea, while maintaining an isocaloric diet for 2 weeks. On Days –1, 1, and 16, urinary glucose excretion (UGE), plasma glucose (PG), fasting PG (FPG), and insulin were measured. The renal threshold for glucose (RTG) was calculated from UGE, PG, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Safety was evaluated based on adverse event (AE) reports, vital signs, electrocardiograms, clinical laboratory tests, and physical examinations. Results Canagliflozin increased UGE dose-dependently (∼80–120 g/day with canagliflozin ≥100 mg), with increases maintained over the 14-day dosing period with each dose. Canagliflozin dose-dependently decreased RTG, with maximal reductions to ∼4–5 mM (72–90 mg/dL). Canagliflozin also reduced FPG and 24-hour mean PG; glucose reductions were seen on Day 1 and maintained over 2 weeks. Plasma insulin reductions with canagliflozin were consistent with observed PG reductions. Canagliflozin also reduced body weight. AEs were transient, mild to moderate in intensity, and balanced across groups; 1 canagliflozin-treated female reported an episode of vaginal candidiasis. Canagliflozin did not cause hypoglycemia, consistent with the RTG values remaining above the hypoglycemia threshold. At Day 16, there were no clinically meaningful changes in urine volume, urine electrolyte excretion, renal function, or routine laboratory test values. Conclusions Canagliflozin increased UGE and decreased RTG, leading to reductions in PG, insulin, and body weight, and was generally well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00963768