1. Optimal Duration of MRI Follow-up to Safely Identify Middle Ear Residual Cholesteatoma
- Author
-
Mohamed Akkari, Pierre-Henri Lefevre, Frédéric Venail, A. Kaderbay, A.-L. Fourez, Michel Mondain, Gregory Gascou, C. Duflos, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier), Université de Montpellier (UM), Physiologie & médecine expérimentale du Cœur et des Muscles [U 1046] (PhyMedExp), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut des Neurosciences de Montpellier (INM), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Montpellier (UM), and Retiveau, Nolwenn
- Subjects
Male ,[SDV.IB.IMA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Bioengineering/Imaging ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Youden's J statistic ,Residual ,MESH: Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,0302 clinical medicine ,MESH: Child ,Medicine ,Child ,MESH: Aged ,MESH: Middle Aged ,Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear ,Cholesteatoma ,MESH: Follow-Up Studies ,Middle Aged ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,MESH: Young Adult ,[SDV.MHEP.OS] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Sensory Organs ,Middle ear ,[SDV.NEU]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC] ,Female ,Adult ,Adolescent ,Ear, Middle ,MESH: Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,MESH: Ear, Middle ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,MESH: Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear ,03 medical and health sciences ,Young Adult ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,[SDV.NEU] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC] ,[SDV.MHEP.OS]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Sensory Organs ,Head & Neck ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,MESH: Adolescent ,MESH: Humans ,Receiver operating characteristic ,business.industry ,Canal wall up ,MESH: Adult ,MESH: Retrospective Studies ,Tympanoplasty ,medicine.disease ,Mr imaging ,MESH: Sensitivity and Specificity ,MESH: Male ,[SDV.IB.IMA] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Bioengineering/Imaging ,Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Neurology (clinical) ,business ,Nuclear medicine ,MESH: Female ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
International audience; Background and purpose: Previous studies have demonstrated the usefulness of non-EPI DWI for detection of residual cholesteatoma. However, limited data are available to determine the suitable duration of imaging follow-up after a first MR imaging with normal findings has been obtained. The present study aimed to determine the optimal duration of non-EPI DWI follow-up for residual cholesteatoma.Materials and methods: A retrospective, monocentric study was performed between 2013 and 2019 and included all participants followed up after canal wall up tympanoplasty with at least 2 non-EPI DWI examinations performed on the same 1.5T MR imaging scanner. MR images were reviewed independently by 2 radiologists. Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated as a function of time after the operation. Receiver operating characteristic curves were analyzed to determine the optimal follow-up duration.Results: We analyzed 47 MRIs from 17 participants. At the end of the individual follow-up period, a residual cholesteatoma had been found in 41.1% of cases. The follow-up duration ranged from 20 to 198 months (mean, 65.9 [SD, 43.9] months). Participants underwent between 2 and 5 non-EPI DWI examinations. Analyses of the receiver operating characteristic curves revealed that the optimal diagnostic value of non-EPI DWI occurred 56 months after the operation when the first MR imaging performed a mean of 17.3 (SD, 6.8) months after the operation had normal findings (sensitivity = 0.71; specificity = 0.7, Youden index = 0.43).Conclusions: Repeat non-EPI DWI is required to detect slow-growing middle ear residual cholesteatomas. We, therefore, recommend performing non-EPI DWI for at least the first 5 years after the initial operation.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF