1. Applying organizational routines in analyzing the behavior of organizations
- Author
-
Becker, Markus C. and Zirpoli, Francesco
- Subjects
Associations, institutions, etc. ,Business ,Economics - Abstract
To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2007.04.002 Byline: Markus C. Becker (a), Francesco Zirpoli (b) Keywords: Organizational routines; Organization behavior; Innovation process; New product development Abstract: The concept of organizational routine can foster our understanding of the behavior of organizations and of organizational change [Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G., 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press/Harvard University Press, Cambridge; March, J.G., Simon, H.A., 1958. Organizations. Blackwell, Oxford (1993); Cyert, R.M., March, J.G., 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Blackwell, Oxford (1992)], but since empirical studies employing organizational routines as analytical perspective are still relatively rare, how to conduct such an analysis and what are its benefits is not yet fully evident. We wish to shed light on how employing routines contributes to understanding the behavior of organizations and to demonstrate the potential of such analysis. The empirical analysis of the product development process at an engineering centre shows that using organizational routines presents advantages over alternative analytical approaches. The paper also contributes to shed light on how to fruitfully employ an organizational routines perspective in analyzing the behavior of organizations, providing the foundation for further empirical work. Author Affiliation: (a) Strategic Organization Design Unit, Department of Marketing & Management, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark (b) Universita di Salerno, Facolta di Ingegneria, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Meccanica, I-84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy Article History: Received 1 December 2004; Revised 1 December 2005; Accepted 1 April 2007 Article Note: (footnote) [star] Authors' names are in alphabetical order because they have contributed to the paper equally. For purposes of formal assignment, Markus Becker wrote Section 2. Francesco Zirpoli wrote Section 3. Sections 1, 4, 5 and 6 were written jointly.
- Published
- 2008