1. Atenolol vs enalapril in young hypertensive patients after successful repair of aortic coarctation.
- Author
-
Di Salvo G, Castaldi B, Gala S, Baldini L, Del Gaizo F, D'Aiello FA, Mormile A, Rea A, Scognamiglio G, Pacileo G, Keating S, Fadel BM, Berrino L, Perna A, Russo MG, and Calabrò R
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists adverse effects, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors adverse effects, Antihypertensive Agents adverse effects, Aortic Coarctation complications, Aortic Coarctation diagnosis, Aortic Coarctation physiopathology, Atenolol adverse effects, Child, Enalapril adverse effects, Female, Humans, Hypertension diagnosis, Hypertension etiology, Hypertension physiopathology, Italy, Male, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists therapeutic use, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors therapeutic use, Antihypertensive Agents therapeutic use, Aortic Coarctation surgery, Atenolol therapeutic use, Blood Pressure drug effects, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Enalapril therapeutic use, Hypertension drug therapy
- Abstract
Late arterial hypertension has been identified as a major predictor for morbidity and mortality in aortic coarctation (AoC) patients. Few data are available about efficacy and tolerability of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors vs beta-blockers in young AoC patients. This study aimed to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy on 24-h blood pressure (BP) and left ventricular mass/height(2.7) (LVMI), of atenolol vs enalapril. We enrolled consecutive AoC hypertensive patients with (a) no history of BP treatment or after >48 h of withdrawn, (b) aged 6-20 years, (c) body mass index (BMI) <90th percentile for age and sex, (d) >12 months from a successful AoC repair and (e) no major associated cardiovascular abnormalities. All patient were evaluated with 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring, standard echocardiography, strain-strain rate imaging, at enrolment, 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment. We studied 51 AoC patients (13±3.9 years, BMI: 21.4±4.3 kg m(-2)). Patients were randomly assigned at atenolol treatment (n=26), or enalapril treatment (n=25). The mean follow-up duration was 11±2 months. Both drugs were able to significantly reduce 24-systolic BP (SBP; atenolol: 133±11 mm Hg vs 124±16 mm Hg, P=0.016; enalapril: 135±6 mm Hg vs 127±7 mm Hg, P=0.001). Only enalapril was able to significantly reduce LVMI (47±12 vs 39.6±10 g m(-)(2.7), P=0.016). Only in atenolol group in two cases (7.7%) drug withdrawal was needed because of adverse events. Enalapril and atenolol are similarly effective in reducing SBP. However, only enalapril demonstrated a significant reduction of LVMI. In no case, enalapril was stopped because of adverse events.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF