Rosy Pandey,1,2 Shyam Kumar Mishra,3,4 Angela Shrestha1 1St. Xavier’s College (Tribhuvan University), Department of Microbiology, Kathmandu, Nepal; 2National Public Health Laboratory, Kathmandu, Nepal; 3UNSW Sydney, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Sydney, Australia; 4Tribhuvan University, Institute of Medicine, Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Department of Microbiology, Kathmandu, NepalCorrespondence: Rosy PandeySt. Xavier’s College, Post Box: 7437, Maitighar, Kathmandu, 44601, NepalTel +977-9803005426Email roseypandey@gmail.comBackground: “ESKAPE” is an acronym for a group of life-threatening nosocomial pathogens, viz, Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter spp. Global efforts on controlling multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms have been hampered by their ability to escape antibacterial drugs. This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of ESKAPE pathogens with prime focus on biofilm production and antibiotic resistance.Methods: A total of 8756 clinical samples were processed for the isolation and identification of ESKAPE pathogens following standard microbiological procedures. These isolates were subjected to antimicrobial sensitivity test as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Test for MDR, extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL), metallo-β-lactamase (MBL), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) was done by the disk diffusion and E-test methods. In the case of VRE molecular detection was done for vanA and vanB genes. All the isolates were processed for biofilm detection by the tube adherence method.Results: The percentage distribution of Enterococcus faecium was 5.5%, S. aureus 33.4%, K. pneumoniae 33.0%, A. baumannii 8.6%, P. aeruginosa 18.6%, and Enterobacter aerogenes 0.9%. MRSA was 57.6%, and vancomycin resistance among Enterococcus faecium was 20%. ESBL- and MBL-producing K. pneumoniae were 16.1%, and 8.1%, A. baumannii 10.3% each and P. aeruginosa 10.7% and 8.3%, respectively. A total of 42.3% of isolates were biofilm producers. Linezolid was the drug of choice for VRE. Ampicillin-sulbactam was most useful against A. baumannii apart from polymyxins, whereas piperacillin-tazobactam was effective against other Gram-negative bacteria. VanA gene was detected in all the VRE isolates.Conclusion: This study estimates the burden of the ESKAPE organisms and their antimicrobial resistance pattern in a hospital setting. A high percentage of drug resistance and biofilm production was noted; hence antimicrobial resistance surveillance targeting ESKAPE pathogens should be incorporated in the infection control policy in Nepal.Keywords: extended-spectrum β-lactamase; ESBL, ESKAPE pathogens, metallo-β-lactamase; MBL, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MRSA, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus; VRE